CIT did an excellent job at exposing lies about the Pentagon - but fail by claiming that the only possibility is that the plane couldn't have hit the Pentagon. Even if true, it is damaging for the truth movement to promote this claim to the public in stead of sticking to these facts:
- NO proof of Hanjour's boarding and taking over
- NO proof of the parts found being matched to "Flight 77"
- NO evidence the plane hit the light poles.
Why clame "fly-over" on top of that? It's getting us nowhere.
The 2 Pentagon Police officers are very credible, saying the plane passed on the North Side of the Citgo station. CitizenInvestigationTeam has video testimonies corroborating this. Arlington police has not released the 911 Dispatch calls from 9/11. What if there were witnesses to a fly over? How would we know?
Soooooooo, noone saw the plane flyover...........There is no physical evidence that a plane didn't hit.........and you assume that they would go to all the trouble of bending lightpoles that could be seen,...flying the plane over that could be seen by many witnesses.......having witnesses see a missile hit the pentagon.......
Sorry but research Penta-con. This disinfo is explained.
@punxsutawneybarney The man is spending his own money doing the research our pathetic government should have done. He is hardly a flim-flam artist. You are so ignorant you don't even know the correct term.
@LordBalto OK, I'll use the correct term: Craig is a liar. He lied blatantly when he claimed at abovetopsecret that Terry Morin's testimony supported the north-of-Citgo flight path. His slanders against Lloyde England and Father McGraw are despicable. He's a disgrace to the 9/11 Truth movement.
CIT did an excellent job at exposing lies about the Pentagon - but fail by claiming that the only possibility is that the plane couldn't have hit the Pentagon. Even if true, it is damaging for the truth movement to promote this claim to the public in stead of sticking to these facts:
- NO proof of Hanjour's boarding and taking over
- NO proof of the parts found being matched to "Flight 77"
- NO evidence the plane hit the light poles.
Why clame "fly-over" on top of that? It's getting us nowhere.
Thetan1974 1 month ago
The 2 Pentagon Police officers are very credible, saying the plane passed on the North Side of the Citgo station. CitizenInvestigationTeam has video testimonies corroborating this. Arlington police has not released the 911 Dispatch calls from 9/11. What if there were witnesses to a fly over? How would we know?
TruthMakesPeace 11 months ago
Soooooooo, noone saw the plane flyover...........There is no physical evidence that a plane didn't hit.........and you assume that they would go to all the trouble of bending lightpoles that could be seen,...flying the plane over that could be seen by many witnesses.......having witnesses see a missile hit the pentagon.......
Sorry but research Penta-con. This disinfo is explained.
pixarian72 1 year ago
Craig is a fast-talking slim-flam man. There is absolutely no evidence for a flyover. Not one witness will say there was a flyover.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
@punxsutawneybarney The man is spending his own money doing the research our pathetic government should have done. He is hardly a flim-flam artist. You are so ignorant you don't even know the correct term.
LordBalto 1 year ago
@LordBalto OK, I'll use the correct term: Craig is a liar. He lied blatantly when he claimed at abovetopsecret that Terry Morin's testimony supported the north-of-Citgo flight path. His slanders against Lloyde England and Father McGraw are despicable. He's a disgrace to the 9/11 Truth movement.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CIT is 100% garbage.
citwatch . blogspot . com
bumblebee8banana 1 year ago
Craig Cranky from "Citizen Deception Team" tells bullsh*t.
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago
A plane most definitly hit the Pentagon.
watch?v=ft5zjNtHANg
watch?v=0DqDBPmV5qc
citizenfor911truth1 2 years ago 2
«pentacon» is a MUST see.
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago