I'm being stalked and harassed because of my support for immigration reform. Is anyone else experiencing this or know of anyone? I can't get police to take a report. I've posted a couple videos about what I'm going through. Also desperately seeking a civil rights attorney.
An Internet video painting Jon Huntsman as a Chairman Mao-style Manchurian Candidate, first believed to have been made by Ron Paul supporters, was actually created by members of the official Jon Huntsman campaign in an effort to smear the Texas congressman.
@muumikopio Not anymore, China's worse than us now in total, and if every one of their citizens used energy like us it'd be even worse. Dont forget India, or countries like Russia, Brazil, Japan, etc. As all the other countries of the world incease their energy consumption as well we'll be even more fucked energy consumption rise as well we'll be even more fu***d
@COLT45keith Actually it is fact.... it is ignorant fools like you who theorize that its just cyclical, which I say is bullshit. Even if you just observe the world you can see how its changing, record heat, cold, rain and snowfalls, etc. all over the world. Fact is that temperatures have risen in the last couple centuries (and accelerated since about the industrial revolution) far swifter than any other period in history. CO2 emissions as well as CFCs and other pollutants are primarily the cause
@sfafasfasfsa Gravity may not be completely understood but it is proven we have it...Global warming in itself is just an theory, let alone what actually causes it...
if ron paul takes out foreign trade policy than the other countries giving us help will do the same to us. Hate all the Paul-tards out there getting brainwashed by him. JON HUNSTMAN 2012
@fsusebaslegend You might as well vote for Obama then. Huntsman is just a sell-out republican version of Obama. He agrees with Obama on: signing the NDAA, starting a war with Iran, individual mandates on health care, cap and trade, SOPA, the TARP funds to use the taxpayers money to bail out the banks who failed from their own faults. Huntsman supports the stimulus packages, which just hurt the economy even worst long-term. Huntsman is Obama, typical status quo President.
@SuperHarvestMan He was appointed by Obama to China, quit the Obama position to run, and instrumental in chinese business (not to mention the huntsman corp, a 9 billion a year business. his religious life is nonexistent, claims mormon, but raised kids catholic, and celebrates the holidays of his adopted indian kids, etc.---- Bradgelina.
@fsusebaslegend LOL, well at least he wasn't Obama's appointee to China. And at least he has mental integrity in regards to his belief system, where this guy is all over the map (a usual indicator that money is only God). He claims mormon, then sends kids to catholic school, celebrates indian holidays due to his Bradangelina adoption practices, LOL, he serves Obama (who appointed him) and his own 9 billion a year business (that he didn't make but inherited)
@thenobs123 Wow, do you always LIKE ppl you know nothing about? You're the kind of person who's been so devastating to the U.S. Um...why don't you find out something before you open your mouth, LOL. That's just contemptible.
Isn't Huntsman the one that gave illegals driving privileges and has an isolationist plan to build a fence all across the southern border to keep them out? Sounds like hypocracy to me. I read that he wants to eliminate corporate taxes for profits made overseas by corporations that outsourced American jobs for cheap labor! I wonder if he starts a war for the Israel lobby that he will send his own sons to die?
First of all no he is against the wall, secondly most of American corportions get most of their profits overseas right now it won't hurt the economy to make more money, and Israel is a terrible ally that has killed US citizens before and has been cruel to palestinians, but a war wont happen between US and Israel
Reps & Senators in the 112thcongress who honored their Oath of Office by voting in a manner that supports & defends the US Constitution & your liberty 100% of the time: Sue Myrick NC, Ron Paul TX, Phil Roe TN, B Posey FL, C Mack FL, Tom McClintock CA, Raul Labrador ID, T Huelskamp KS, T Johnson IL, W Jones NC, A Harris MD, T Graves GA, John Duncan, JR TN, Jeffery Duncan SC, J Campbell CA, J Chaffetz UT, J Amash MI, Rand Paul KY! 18 of 535 on ur side-vote with care-Ron Paul 2012
Huntman's a moron who's only role is to take as many votes away from the truly anti-establishment candidate (Ron Paul) as possible in order to seal the victory for his big government obama-care authoring liberal mormon buddy Romney.
Too bad all of these attempts to smear Paul can readily be read in the daily news huh dipshit? Shows what contempt he has for the American people.
@ Jon Cuntsman's new Unelectable ad: Everyone get the word out that Huntsman is openly racist against Chinese people.
Google - "Huntsman Colbert delivery food joke"
Google - "Huntsman take China down"
Thumbs up so everyone sees it. Ron Paul can't lose over that stupid new ad. They even disabled the comments and ratings to try to block us. Now it's only gonna be worse!!!
Less government spending, less taxation to American Citizens, a budget plan that works.
This man has been fighting for your personal freedom and the separation of congress from big business for years. He stands against draconian bills like SOPA, NDAA and the Patriot Act.
He has fought against the war on drugs, the foreign wars, the federal reserve, and corporate bail outs.
We defaulted many times over according to the real world - Default= Unable to pay it does not mean print more GET HONEST the American people are not that gullible
Bachmann is real hoot :) - She has some nice ideas, albeit nearly powerless for their implementation ....she basically panders to the marginally educated cross section of the electorate that picks their leaders like they are socks that nobody will ever see.
@ 440 he makes another profoundly poor statement by speaking boldly about something he knows nothing about and then presently faulty information with regard to the the source of the consensus that he presents. (100 climate scientists.... )
He is fundamentally incorrect in that he is failing to address the source of the disease and the real peril which afflicts us. What he is proposing is the use of Band Aids on an axe wound
@unhealthycarrot What are you talking about? I've changed my rankings (Johnson > Paul > Huntsman > Everyone Else) and the only thing preventing my from leaving my reasoning is the youtube commenting 500 character limit.
@Scraxs I could make similar arguments for why some people hope there isn't a God. They don't want to be held accountable for the things they've done that they know are immoral and by convincing themselves that they don't have to answer to a higher being for the things they've done in this life after they die they can better enjoy the pleasures and vices of this life. Another reason why atheists cling to their faith is ego.
@Sistarovat I never claimed that people disbelieving in god was evidence for or against a god existing. I was responding to the question: "Why would humans of all cultures and nationalities be inherently religious if there was no God?".
My argument was: Just because we don't know why something happens in nature, doesn't mean a supernatural answer has any more validity. If there's no evidence for a god making religion inherent in people, it can be dismissed without evidence.
@Scraxs How convenient of you to claim that one of the imperfections of the human brain is a universal sentiment that YOU happen to disagree with. I guess I could say that proof that the human brain is imperfect is the fact that there is a minority of people in this world who don't believe in God. I guess they have a mental short circuit, not me (heavy sarcasm).
He wouldn't have gotten people to write his message in a book if he wanted people to believe? People do believe b/c of that Book.
@Sistarovat No. Not sure if you intentionally misunderstood. I meant it could be that some people use magic as an easy answer for how the world works. And that's one way for religion to originate everywhere naturally.
There are many other natural explanations. BUT!!! even if there wasn't, there's no need to invoke a supernatural explanation. "God did it" can be used to fill up any gap in our knowledge.
People do believe b/c of that Book. And more people would believe if it came out on kindle.
@Sistarovat There are more possible reasons they have the same idea other than people searching for answers. Fear of death, loneliness, being in times of desperation, to remove the feeling of guilt.
All are more plausible than a supernatural explanation. These are not reasons why most people believe, but are reasons why religion sprouts all around the world.
So it's not only another god of the gaps argument, it's an unconvincing god of the gaps argument.
In all honesty, if it was Huntsman vs. Obama, Huntsman would tear him to pieces in both polls and in votes. For what reason would any republican or democrat pick Obama over Huntsman? None
@Scraxs I know the Bible is a supernatural book because there are dozens of scientific facts recorded in the Bible which were written down before "science" discovered them.
Roundness of the Earth - Isaiah 40:22 (KJV) - 8th century B.C.
The Water Cycle - Ecclesiastes 1:7 - 10th century B.C.
The position of the Earth in space + gravitational field - Job 26:7 - 20th-18th B.C.
Increasing Entropy in the universe - Psalm 102:25-27 - 10th century B.C.
@Scraxs I didn't ask why do people proselytize their religions. I asked why are humans inherently religious. When "primitive man" (as you believe in) "evolved" enough to think, what caused him to start worshiping things? how is it that everybody else happened to have the same idea regardless of what part of the globe they came of age on? You think Yahweh is made up? Why?
@Sistarovat "how is it that everybody else happened to have the same idea regardless of what part of the globe they came of age on?" The answer is I don't know. It would be dishonest to give an explanation without the data to back it up. The brain i imperfect, it uses mental shortcuts, so people accept easy answers, whether there's any evidence or not.
"You think Yahweh is made up? Why?" Like I said, he wouldn't have gotten people to write his message in a book if he wanted people to believe.
Huntsman comes across as intelligent and reasonable and honest, which puts him a good bit above most Republican candidates in my book. My vote is going to Ron Paul partially because he has those credentials as well.
@Scraxs There has never been a society in the history of the world that had no religion at all. Even if you find the most backwards, backwater society in Africa or South America, its people are worshipping something. How do you explain that other than that God allows humans to be inherently religious so that they will seek after Him. Furthermore, what makes you so sure that the God of the Bible isn't God? I mean other than the fact that you hope there isn't a God?
@Sistarovat "How do you explain that other than that God allows humans to be inherently religious so that they will seek after Him." Too many reasons. Comfort, power, authority, to explain natural phenomenon. People also thought the Sun revolved around the Earth. No one knows the real reason yet, but it's an argument from ignorance to claim a god did it whenever there's a gap in our knowledge.
"what makes you so sure that the God of the Bible isn't God?" ???You mean why I think Yaweh is made up?
Read the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, the Federalist Papers, Geo Washington's Farewell Address, Bastiat's essay The Law. When you know this is a republic (rule of law) not a democracy (mob rule) you understand what we are to be. RESTORE AMERICA 2012 RON PAUL 'There are two ways to conquer a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by DEBT." John Adams 2nd Pres of US. We are under siege. We need a new kind of President one who is on the side of the PEOPLE: Ron Paul
@Scraxs The fact that men make up religions is proof that there is a Deity. Why would humans of all cultures and nationalities be inherently religious if there was no God? Why would God use a book to communicate to His creation? Well, according to the Bible, man is sinful and God is perfect and holy. A holy, sinless, perfect God cannot stand to be in the presence of sin, so He doesn't personally tell each individual why they're here and His will for their life. How else if not through a Book?
@Sistarovat "How else if not through a Book?" Drop a bunch of solar powered kindles in bronze age = many more converts. And make the book more scientific, detailing how to experimentally prove the age of the Earth and all the other claims made.
Not all cultures are religious. But it's difficult for a culture not to be because religions (especially the most successful ones) have mechanisms like to be fruitful and multiply, spread the religion, condemn the heathens etc. Generations become inclined
@Scraxs I believe in a Creator. If the universe has a Creator then it only logical that that Creator created everything for His pleasure. Human beings are the most intelligent beings created, so it would only make sense that our Creator would give mankind some form of written record telling him where he came from, what he's doing here, and what the purpose of his existence is. Btw, what is the most-read book in the history of the world?
@Sistarovat The bible and quran are the most printed books at this time.. with the help of many successful conquests, tortures, inquisitions and useful doctrines to multiply and spread the religion. Though these days its about 10 adherents through birth for every 1 conversion.
If there was an intelligent creator I don't see why it would give it's most important message in a book of all things unless it really wanted to make it look like just another man made religion.
@FinalLugiaGuardian That's not how evolution works? Well, now how do we know how evolution works? We don't have any proof that evolution works at all like Darwin presupposed. As far as the moths go, it's just like a light-skinned person breeding with a dark-skinned person. If a black person and a white person have a brown child, we don't point to that as proof of evolution. It's the same with the moths. When dark moths outnumber light moths, the entire species is eventually going to look dark.
@Scraxs I never said that I believe that rate is constant. But if you accept the evolutionist's timeline on the development and age of the sun, you practically have to believe in a metaphysical force inside the Earth that would coordinate greenhouse gases perfectly with the sun during the Earth's early years so as to allow life to exist as long as evolutionists believe life to have existed here.
@Sistarovat Then can you tell me what convinces you that the Earth is younger then several million years? If the evidence you give doesn't convince you then it probably wont convince me either.
@FinalLugiaGuardian I have no problem with the science of natural selection like the kind that happened with the moths. Those are facts and common sense. But we should keep in mind that those moths did not become birds. They did not become bats. They did not become squirrels or some other kind of new animal. They are still...moths - which certainly doesn't prove we evolved from anything other than humans.
@Sistarovat You really gonna use the croco-duck argument? Of course the moths didn't become bats or birds. Neither did ducks become crocodiles.That's not how evolution works. Moths, birds, and bats all have a separate evolutionary line. They evolved from different common ancestors which are now extinct. Evolution only makes new species, like when archaeopteryx evolved into the 1st modern birds. It doesn't cause a member of one species to evolve into a member of another already existing species.
@FinalLugiaGuardian An example would be, say the government decided to start killing off white people in Nebraska (a state with about the same percentage of blacks as the % of dark moths in England before 1848) and not let anyone in or out of that state. As time went on, blacks and other dark skin people in Nebraska would become the majority and over time, it would become a rarity to find any light-skinned people in Nebraska. The population's darkening melanin would amount to natural selection.
@FinalLugiaGuardian You're right, the peppered moth is not a chameleon. It's been a couple of years since I was in high school and studied about the peppered moth, so I had to refresh my memory with a little Wikipedia. As the trees became darker from soot, the light moths got eaten, causing a rise in the previously minority dark moths. So, naturally over time the dominant allele in those moths became the dark-bodied moth.
@Sistarovat Yes, that's what evolution does. The light peppered moths got spotted and eaten while the dark moths remained hidden from view. Over time, the population grew darker. Those darker moths had a great advantage over the lighter colored moths. This is evolution by natural selection. It's what Darwin was referring to when he wrote The Origin of Species. Darwin wasn't the 1st to say evolution happened. Darwin just gave it a mechanism in natural selection. Evolution is a fact. J.H.2012.
@Scraxs So, what's to say this rate has not been constant? There is no proof that it has been constant, but we have no proof that it has not. Another thing is the Earth's population. Evolutionists disagree with the possible population of the Earth in 10,000 B.C., but the usual estimates are 1-4 million. But they also believe it took 2,490,000 years for the human population to make it that high. That is simply mathematically impossible. It is a far stretch to say there were even a million then.
@Scraxs According to John A. Eddy (Harvard -Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and High Altitude Observatory in Boulder) and Aram A. Boornazian a mathematician with S. Ross and Co. in Boston, the sun is shrinking at about five feet per hour or 0.1% per century. Assuming this rate has been constant, 1 million years ago, the Earth would have been so hot that no life could have survived and less than 15 million years ago, the sun would have been touching the Earth.
@Sistarovat "Assuming this rate has been constant"
What reason is there to assume the rate is constant? Our Sun oscillates 9 times each century.
NASA website: /uoɔןos‾uɐɾ71/3002/ɐsɐu-ʇɐ-ǝɔuǝıɔs/sʍǝu-ǝɔuǝıɔs/ʌoƃ˙ɐsɐu˙ǝɔuǝıɔs//:dʇʇɥ
Also they never published their finding as a scientific paper. It was only an abstract. Which was then picked up by Russell Akridge who made that assumption himself for the institute of creation research.
@FinalLugiaGuardian Sure, I've read about the peppered moth. Lizards can blend into their environment, that doesn't prove we evolved out of a rock over billions of years.
@Sistarovat A Chameleon's ability to blend in is different. The moths changed color by changing their DNA by natural selection over several successive generations. The moth's color change wasn't by its choice and wasn't within a single animal. Instead, in each new generation of moths, the darker ones survived while the lighter ones got eaten. The result is the darker moths reproduced more. And saying we evolved from a rock is cutting it close to the Biblical story of Adam's creation. J.H.2012.
@FinalLugiaGuardian "These difficulties and objections may be classed under the following heads:—First, why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?" - Charles Darwin,
@FinalLugiaGuardian "For myself, also, I rejoice profoundly; for, thinking of so many cases of men pursuing an illusion for years, often and often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may not have devoted my life to a phantasy." - Charles Darwin Letter to C. Lyell Charles Darwin,
@FinalLugiaGuardian Ahem, most of these men WERE alive after Darwin's fairy tale was published. Are you aware that Darwin himself expressed doubts about his lunatic theory? Suppose you believe Darwin's theory the way I believe the Bible. What convincing evidence can you present that would prove Darwin's madness to be scientific fact. And biology textbooks aren't evidence because if you count them as evidence, I could use the Bible as evidence for my belief.
@Sistarovat I'd rather believe that things happen by chance than through the will of a maniacal autocrat. Science is fair. God punishes people for the imperfections He gave them while supporters tout how He is "all-loving".
@Sistarovat The Founding Fathers, Madison, Franklin, Adams, Hamilton, Jay, Jefferson, and Washington all died before 1859, the year the Origin of Species was published. Not sure about the other men you mentioned. As for evidence of evolution, look at the evolution of the peppered moth. The species changed color from ivory to black when pollution turned the UK's trees black with soot. This is natural selection. As for Darwin expressing doubting his theory, where was it stated and what did he say?
@acmilanboi Whoa, whoa, wait a minute now. It has just been in the past sixty or so years that evolution has become mainstream in this country and this country has gotten into the mess we're in just in the past sixty years. The vast majority of our Founding Fathers were Creationists. Louis Pasteur, Samuel Morse, Charles Babbage, John Ambrose Fleming, and countless others were prominent, accomplished scientists and inventors who didn't need Darwin's fairy tale to succeed.
@Sistarovat Of course these men were not believers in the theory of evolution. "Darwin's fairy tale," as you put it Sistarovat, had not yet been published when the USA was first founded. Call me crazy, but don't you have to have knowledge of a subject's existence before you are able to have a belief about it? You fail.
Seems like a pretty good candidate but he is wrong that we have never defaulted. We did several times before. The first was 1790 and then again in 1933. And between 1841 and 1842, 9 states defaulted and between 1873 and 1884 10 states defaulted which lead to many states adding a balanced budget amendment.
I honestly think it is too soon to any of us to say who we're gonna vote for. I mean really, primaries are still 13 months away! People are gonna drop out between now and then, issues may change slightly. Circumstances 'will' change, that is why i haven't made up and will not make up my mind until it gets within about a month of election time. It's a personal thing and should be for all Americans. This is our Freedom we're talking about, these are our Rights. We MUST be careful who we choose.
@ghicken Paul is antiquated, and so is his policy like wanting to leave the UN. Huntsman is a pragmatist and an international expert, especially in Asia.
Visit opdrop.com/list/17/Best-Candidate-for-President-of-the-United-States-of-America-in-2012 to tell people why you think Huntsman should be president for 2012
This country has to default. We can't keep on creating money out of thin air and solving debt by adding more debt if that keeps up the dollar will CRASH which is 100x worse than a default
As an obama supporter, I like Huntsman. This guy is not a nut as everyone else in the Republican party. To me, he is more like a conservative Democrat and I wouldn't mind voting for him.
i am from ISRAEL. you spent a lot of money for security of us in the middle east. thats why your economy was damaged. you are so stupid because we used your tax income just improve our weapons. long live ISRAEL.
@vas13xtq WHAT? Evolution does not drive biological sciences. Biological sciences were around before Darwin's insane, unprovable theory ever made it into all the government school textbooks. If evolutioin were true, there would be millions and millions of transitional fossils from the hundreds of millions of years that evolutionism claims transitional creatures existed. Where are they? And I'm not talking about the Neanderthal man who turned out to be a human with arthritis.
Huntsman is a political idiot. He would make a good Secretary of State, but he has no political tact whatsoever. Calling evolution a science?!? Are you freaking KIDDING me?!? Evolutionism is the stupidest and most dangerous nonsense that has ever come out of the depraved sewer of man's mind. There are roughly 50,000,000 creationists who will vote in the Republican primary and this bozo basically told them, "you're too stupid to vote for me". LOSER!!!
@Sistarovat Are you an idiot? Really, this is a serious question. Evolution is what drives biological sciences. For an example, our total understanding of the medical field revolves around this phenomenon. Every time you go to a medical doctor, you are supporting evolution. Huntsman is the most reasonable candidate. He doesn't comment logical fallacies like the other candidates. He is the only hope for the republicans to get the presidency.
Jon Huntsman is like endangered Panda, there is very little time untill they will extinct. And one day we will talk about these funny species and hardly believe they ever existed. Republican who supports science and evolution, ha - was he also an atheist? lol
@Lius525 I'm an Obama supporter, but if I had to vote for Republican, it would be Jon Huntsman. He's the only Republican running who is sane. I do disagree with your implication that christians don't believe in science and evolution. Most of us do. Not all of us who are christians, think like Rick Perry. Huntsman is like most people of faith in America. We believe in God AND Evolution. It's not an "either, or" thing.
I don't like obama but NOT vote for a Rick Perry type tea party guy. Huntsman is the type of GOP I was until Bush followed by Palin started running me out of the party.
I actually want a guy with intelligence as President
@Cuffsmaster I am a liberal - NOT a Democrat, I don't think they're liberals anymore - and I tend to like John Huntsman, but the reasons for my liking him are a bit troubling. I find myself saying, "boy it's refreshing to hear a Republican who thinks that Earth is older than 6,000 years. Boy! it's nice to find a Republican who doesn't think rape victims ought to give birth to rape babies." If the conservative candidates won't wake up, the conservative voters have to wake them.
@CitizenMusicUSA the South (in USA) if full of voters that think Perry is wonderful. Hell his first stop in South Carolina to speak was Liberty University. They think the earth is 6000 years old and teach that crap.
It's really nice to see a moderate republican this time around. The most ridiculous thing though and a bit of proof that this is a broken political system, is that in spite of his record his centrist rationality will probably kill his chance for nomination.
Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul 2012
@Crimsonphilosophy Obama is the least rational person alive. He advocates economic policy that has been disproven in Japan and Spain and even here in America. He fails to live in a reality that the economy is controlled by businesses both small and large and that the only way it will get better is to work with them. The mandates, corruption, and blatant class warfare is wasting the very small window we have left before our currency collapses under the weight of our ever growing debt.
Huntsman is definitly the best (at least the most electable) of the GOP Candidates right now. He could give Obama a good challenge. Huntsman is also not crazy like Palin, Pual, or Bachman. Here's hoping more GOP moderates vote in the GOP primaries this time.
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm being stalked and harassed because of my support for immigration reform. Is anyone else experiencing this or know of anyone? I can't get police to take a report. I've posted a couple videos about what I'm going through. Also desperately seeking a civil rights attorney.
keepingsweets 3 weeks ago
Wow a majority of these comments are crap. He makes rational sense. I am amazed.
KaiMatsu500 1 month ago
Thumbs up because he dropped out of the race!
Enfocomp 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Romney? Go fu*k yourself Jon. Now I want a refund on the contributions you fraud.
echobret 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
John Huntsman Drops Out; Welcome Huntsman Supporters to Ron Paul! thecaucus.blogs. nytimes .com/2012/01/15/huntsman-says-hes-quitting-g-o-p-race/
njiuma 1 month ago
I don't believe you Huntsman
JamieDix2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An Internet video painting Jon Huntsman as a Chairman Mao-style Manchurian Candidate, first believed to have been made by Ron Paul supporters, was actually created by members of the official Jon Huntsman campaign in an effort to smear the Texas congressman.
therightperspective . org/2012/01/10/huntsman-campaign-made-anti-huntsman-ad/
(take out the spaces in the link)
Vote4RonPaulLiberty 1 month ago
Global warming IS A THEORY...It sounds good for people in ignorance of the facts...
COLT45keith 1 month ago
@COLT45keith - It is the most propable theory around the world.
And on a second note...
'Merica...it is you.
muumikopio 1 month ago
@muumikopio Not anymore, China's worse than us now in total, and if every one of their citizens used energy like us it'd be even worse. Dont forget India, or countries like Russia, Brazil, Japan, etc. As all the other countries of the world incease their energy consumption as well we'll be even more fucked energy consumption rise as well we'll be even more fu***d
Caedo713 3 weeks ago
@COLT45keith Actually it is fact.... it is ignorant fools like you who theorize that its just cyclical, which I say is bullshit. Even if you just observe the world you can see how its changing, record heat, cold, rain and snowfalls, etc. all over the world. Fact is that temperatures have risen in the last couple centuries (and accelerated since about the industrial revolution) far swifter than any other period in history. CO2 emissions as well as CFCs and other pollutants are primarily the cause
Caedo713 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
COLT45keith 3 weeks ago
@COLT45keith so is gravity. do you understand what a scientific theory is.
sfafasfasfsa 2 days ago
@sfafasfasfsa Gravity may not be completely understood but it is proven we have it...Global warming in itself is just an theory, let alone what actually causes it...
COLT45keith 2 days ago
UNREALISTIC???? I LIVE IN THE REAL WORLD...GAS PRICES WENT UP LIKE THAT...
COLT45keith 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
donate to the revolution today at ronpaul2012dotcom
jboles633 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Both Jon Huntsman And Barack Obama Agree ......
/watch?v=CmadLQJrpTs
ichigo73186 1 month ago
John Huntsman?! Who the FUCK is John Huntsman?!?! Nuff said LOL!!!
BomaBoi 1 month ago
What the hell is with these obvious sockpuppet comments?
DustofDryBones 1 month ago
HUNTSMAN 2012!!
NH4HuntsmanJr 1 month ago
if ron paul takes out foreign trade policy than the other countries giving us help will do the same to us. Hate all the Paul-tards out there getting brainwashed by him. JON HUNSTMAN 2012
fsusebaslegend 1 month ago
@fsusebaslegend You might as well vote for Obama then. Huntsman is just a sell-out republican version of Obama. He agrees with Obama on: signing the NDAA, starting a war with Iran, individual mandates on health care, cap and trade, SOPA, the TARP funds to use the taxpayers money to bail out the banks who failed from their own faults. Huntsman supports the stimulus packages, which just hurt the economy even worst long-term. Huntsman is Obama, typical status quo President.
SuperHarvestMan 1 month ago
@SuperHarvestMan He was appointed by Obama to China, quit the Obama position to run, and instrumental in chinese business (not to mention the huntsman corp, a 9 billion a year business. his religious life is nonexistent, claims mormon, but raised kids catholic, and celebrates the holidays of his adopted indian kids, etc.---- Bradgelina.
westchesterny 1 month ago
@fsusebaslegend LOL, well at least he wasn't Obama's appointee to China. And at least he has mental integrity in regards to his belief system, where this guy is all over the map (a usual indicator that money is only God). He claims mormon, then sends kids to catholic school, celebrates indian holidays due to his Bradangelina adoption practices, LOL, he serves Obama (who appointed him) and his own 9 billion a year business (that he didn't make but inherited)
westchesterny 1 month ago
i like this guy although i dont know much about him
thenobs123 1 month ago
@thenobs123 Wow, do you always LIKE ppl you know nothing about? You're the kind of person who's been so devastating to the U.S. Um...why don't you find out something before you open your mouth, LOL. That's just contemptible.
westchesterny 1 month ago
@westchesterny Holy shit. Why did you freak out? Im guessing youre a girl right? Shut the fuck up you fucking ignorant piece of shit.
thenobs123 1 month ago
A lot of butt hurt ron paul supporters commenting here LAWL
titanaarn 1 month ago
@titanaarn You guys attack with gibberish and without reason We attack with reason and logic.
unhealthycarrot 1 month ago
Isn't Huntsman the one that gave illegals driving privileges and has an isolationist plan to build a fence all across the southern border to keep them out? Sounds like hypocracy to me. I read that he wants to eliminate corporate taxes for profits made overseas by corporations that outsourced American jobs for cheap labor! I wonder if he starts a war for the Israel lobby that he will send his own sons to die?
lioness54703 1 month ago
@lioness54703
First of all no he is against the wall, secondly most of American corportions get most of their profits overseas right now it won't hurt the economy to make more money, and Israel is a terrible ally that has killed US citizens before and has been cruel to palestinians, but a war wont happen between US and Israel
thehobowizard 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Reps & Senators in the 112thcongress who honored their Oath of Office by voting in a manner that supports & defends the US Constitution & your liberty 100% of the time: Sue Myrick NC, Ron Paul TX, Phil Roe TN, B Posey FL, C Mack FL, Tom McClintock CA, Raul Labrador ID, T Huelskamp KS, T Johnson IL, W Jones NC, A Harris MD, T Graves GA, John Duncan, JR TN, Jeffery Duncan SC, J Campbell CA, J Chaffetz UT, J Amash MI, Rand Paul KY! 18 of 535 on ur side-vote with care-Ron Paul 2012
possumpistol 1 month ago
hunt cunt
MrJosh91189 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Huntman's a moron who's only role is to take as many votes away from the truly anti-establishment candidate (Ron Paul) as possible in order to seal the victory for his big government obama-care authoring liberal mormon buddy Romney.
Too bad all of these attempts to smear Paul can readily be read in the daily news huh dipshit? Shows what contempt he has for the American people.
LIBERTYALONE 1 month ago
go huntsman!!!
Tryceattack 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ Jon Cuntsman's new Unelectable ad: Everyone get the word out that Huntsman is openly racist against Chinese people.
Google - "Huntsman Colbert delivery food joke"
Google - "Huntsman take China down"
Thumbs up so everyone sees it. Ron Paul can't lose over that stupid new ad. They even disabled the comments and ratings to try to block us. Now it's only gonna be worse!!!
quanch 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Support Ron Paul.
Less government spending, less taxation to American Citizens, a budget plan that works.
This man has been fighting for your personal freedom and the separation of congress from big business for years. He stands against draconian bills like SOPA, NDAA and the Patriot Act.
He has fought against the war on drugs, the foreign wars, the federal reserve, and corporate bail outs.
Vote for liberty this year. Vote for real change.
Thumb up and spread the message!
RapsAlive 2 months ago
Huntsman is a fraud.
goldcurrent1 2 months ago
Huntsman is definitely getting my vote!
kb0671 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Huntsman is a strong supporter of Israel and has made several visits to Israel watch?v=lOZag4Pg4Xs
Communist2012 2 months ago
We defaulted many times over according to the real world - Default= Unable to pay it does not mean print more GET HONEST the American people are not that gullible
GovernMentalFreedom 2 months ago
Ron Paul has a lot of great ideas
GovernMentalFreedom 2 months ago
What is his stance on the Federal Reserve and the global gangsters which it represents ?
particlejunkie 2 months ago
Bachmann is real hoot :) - She has some nice ideas, albeit nearly powerless for their implementation ....she basically panders to the marginally educated cross section of the electorate that picks their leaders like they are socks that nobody will ever see.
particlejunkie 2 months ago
@ 440 he makes another profoundly poor statement by speaking boldly about something he knows nothing about and then presently faulty information with regard to the the source of the consensus that he presents. (100 climate scientists.... )
particlejunkie 2 months ago
He is fundamentally incorrect in that he is failing to address the source of the disease and the real peril which afflicts us. What he is proposing is the use of Band Aids on an axe wound
particlejunkie 2 months ago
Gary Johnson > Jon Huntsman > Ron Paul > Obama > Everyone else. Gary Johnson can not win, sadly, so I'm placing all my hope and faith in Huntsman.
ifhgsfj 2 months ago
@ifhgsfj Where's your reasoning? Oh wait you have none, you're the typical american.
unhealthycarrot 1 month ago
@unhealthycarrot What are you talking about? I've changed my rankings (Johnson > Paul > Huntsman > Everyone Else) and the only thing preventing my from leaving my reasoning is the youtube commenting 500 character limit.
ifhgsfj 1 month ago
1. Brings up another video about politics.
2. Immediately sees asshats arguing over religion
3. Places blinder over comments and watches video.
infin1ty 3 months ago
@infin1ty Sorry sir, I'll stop now.
Scraxs 3 months ago
@Scraxs I could make similar arguments for why some people hope there isn't a God. They don't want to be held accountable for the things they've done that they know are immoral and by convincing themselves that they don't have to answer to a higher being for the things they've done in this life after they die they can better enjoy the pleasures and vices of this life. Another reason why atheists cling to their faith is ego.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat I never claimed that people disbelieving in god was evidence for or against a god existing. I was responding to the question: "Why would humans of all cultures and nationalities be inherently religious if there was no God?".
My argument was: Just because we don't know why something happens in nature, doesn't mean a supernatural answer has any more validity. If there's no evidence for a god making religion inherent in people, it can be dismissed without evidence.
Scraxs 3 months ago
@Scraxs How convenient of you to claim that one of the imperfections of the human brain is a universal sentiment that YOU happen to disagree with. I guess I could say that proof that the human brain is imperfect is the fact that there is a minority of people in this world who don't believe in God. I guess they have a mental short circuit, not me (heavy sarcasm).
He wouldn't have gotten people to write his message in a book if he wanted people to believe? People do believe b/c of that Book.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat No. Not sure if you intentionally misunderstood. I meant it could be that some people use magic as an easy answer for how the world works. And that's one way for religion to originate everywhere naturally.
There are many other natural explanations. BUT!!! even if there wasn't, there's no need to invoke a supernatural explanation. "God did it" can be used to fill up any gap in our knowledge.
People do believe b/c of that Book. And more people would believe if it came out on kindle.
Scraxs 3 months ago
@Sistarovat There are more possible reasons they have the same idea other than people searching for answers. Fear of death, loneliness, being in times of desperation, to remove the feeling of guilt.
All are more plausible than a supernatural explanation. These are not reasons why most people believe, but are reasons why religion sprouts all around the world.
So it's not only another god of the gaps argument, it's an unconvincing god of the gaps argument.
Scraxs 3 months ago
In all honesty, if it was Huntsman vs. Obama, Huntsman would tear him to pieces in both polls and in votes. For what reason would any republican or democrat pick Obama over Huntsman? None
TheUselessCritic 3 months ago
@Scraxs I know the Bible is a supernatural book because there are dozens of scientific facts recorded in the Bible which were written down before "science" discovered them.
Roundness of the Earth - Isaiah 40:22 (KJV) - 8th century B.C.
The Water Cycle - Ecclesiastes 1:7 - 10th century B.C.
The position of the Earth in space + gravitational field - Job 26:7 - 20th-18th B.C.
Increasing Entropy in the universe - Psalm 102:25-27 - 10th century B.C.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
Comment removed
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Scraxs I didn't ask why do people proselytize their religions. I asked why are humans inherently religious. When "primitive man" (as you believe in) "evolved" enough to think, what caused him to start worshiping things? how is it that everybody else happened to have the same idea regardless of what part of the globe they came of age on? You think Yahweh is made up? Why?
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat "how is it that everybody else happened to have the same idea regardless of what part of the globe they came of age on?" The answer is I don't know. It would be dishonest to give an explanation without the data to back it up. The brain i imperfect, it uses mental shortcuts, so people accept easy answers, whether there's any evidence or not.
"You think Yahweh is made up? Why?" Like I said, he wouldn't have gotten people to write his message in a book if he wanted people to believe.
Scraxs 3 months ago
Huntsman comes across as intelligent and reasonable and honest, which puts him a good bit above most Republican candidates in my book. My vote is going to Ron Paul partially because he has those credentials as well.
WinS392 3 months ago
@Scraxs There has never been a society in the history of the world that had no religion at all. Even if you find the most backwards, backwater society in Africa or South America, its people are worshipping something. How do you explain that other than that God allows humans to be inherently religious so that they will seek after Him. Furthermore, what makes you so sure that the God of the Bible isn't God? I mean other than the fact that you hope there isn't a God?
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat "How do you explain that other than that God allows humans to be inherently religious so that they will seek after Him." Too many reasons. Comfort, power, authority, to explain natural phenomenon. People also thought the Sun revolved around the Earth. No one knows the real reason yet, but it's an argument from ignorance to claim a god did it whenever there's a gap in our knowledge.
"what makes you so sure that the God of the Bible isn't God?" ???You mean why I think Yaweh is made up?
Scraxs 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, the Federalist Papers, Geo Washington's Farewell Address, Bastiat's essay The Law. When you know this is a republic (rule of law) not a democracy (mob rule) you understand what we are to be. RESTORE AMERICA 2012 RON PAUL 'There are two ways to conquer a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by DEBT." John Adams 2nd Pres of US. We are under siege. We need a new kind of President one who is on the side of the PEOPLE: Ron Paul
possumpistol 3 months ago
@Scraxs The fact that men make up religions is proof that there is a Deity. Why would humans of all cultures and nationalities be inherently religious if there was no God? Why would God use a book to communicate to His creation? Well, according to the Bible, man is sinful and God is perfect and holy. A holy, sinless, perfect God cannot stand to be in the presence of sin, so He doesn't personally tell each individual why they're here and His will for their life. How else if not through a Book?
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat "How else if not through a Book?" Drop a bunch of solar powered kindles in bronze age = many more converts. And make the book more scientific, detailing how to experimentally prove the age of the Earth and all the other claims made.
Not all cultures are religious. But it's difficult for a culture not to be because religions (especially the most successful ones) have mechanisms like to be fruitful and multiply, spread the religion, condemn the heathens etc. Generations become inclined
Scraxs 3 months ago
Comment removed
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Scraxs I believe in a Creator. If the universe has a Creator then it only logical that that Creator created everything for His pleasure. Human beings are the most intelligent beings created, so it would only make sense that our Creator would give mankind some form of written record telling him where he came from, what he's doing here, and what the purpose of his existence is. Btw, what is the most-read book in the history of the world?
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat The bible and quran are the most printed books at this time.. with the help of many successful conquests, tortures, inquisitions and useful doctrines to multiply and spread the religion. Though these days its about 10 adherents through birth for every 1 conversion.
If there was an intelligent creator I don't see why it would give it's most important message in a book of all things unless it really wanted to make it look like just another man made religion.
Scraxs 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian That's not how evolution works? Well, now how do we know how evolution works? We don't have any proof that evolution works at all like Darwin presupposed. As far as the moths go, it's just like a light-skinned person breeding with a dark-skinned person. If a black person and a white person have a brown child, we don't point to that as proof of evolution. It's the same with the moths. When dark moths outnumber light moths, the entire species is eventually going to look dark.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Scraxs I never said that I believe that rate is constant. But if you accept the evolutionist's timeline on the development and age of the sun, you practically have to believe in a metaphysical force inside the Earth that would coordinate greenhouse gases perfectly with the sun during the Earth's early years so as to allow life to exist as long as evolutionists believe life to have existed here.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat Then can you tell me what convinces you that the Earth is younger then several million years? If the evidence you give doesn't convince you then it probably wont convince me either.
Scraxs 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian I have no problem with the science of natural selection like the kind that happened with the moths. Those are facts and common sense. But we should keep in mind that those moths did not become birds. They did not become bats. They did not become squirrels or some other kind of new animal. They are still...moths - which certainly doesn't prove we evolved from anything other than humans.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat You really gonna use the croco-duck argument? Of course the moths didn't become bats or birds. Neither did ducks become crocodiles.That's not how evolution works. Moths, birds, and bats all have a separate evolutionary line. They evolved from different common ancestors which are now extinct. Evolution only makes new species, like when archaeopteryx evolved into the 1st modern birds. It doesn't cause a member of one species to evolve into a member of another already existing species.
FinalLugiaGuardian 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian An example would be, say the government decided to start killing off white people in Nebraska (a state with about the same percentage of blacks as the % of dark moths in England before 1848) and not let anyone in or out of that state. As time went on, blacks and other dark skin people in Nebraska would become the majority and over time, it would become a rarity to find any light-skinned people in Nebraska. The population's darkening melanin would amount to natural selection.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian You're right, the peppered moth is not a chameleon. It's been a couple of years since I was in high school and studied about the peppered moth, so I had to refresh my memory with a little Wikipedia. As the trees became darker from soot, the light moths got eaten, causing a rise in the previously minority dark moths. So, naturally over time the dominant allele in those moths became the dark-bodied moth.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat Yes, that's what evolution does. The light peppered moths got spotted and eaten while the dark moths remained hidden from view. Over time, the population grew darker. Those darker moths had a great advantage over the lighter colored moths. This is evolution by natural selection. It's what Darwin was referring to when he wrote The Origin of Species. Darwin wasn't the 1st to say evolution happened. Darwin just gave it a mechanism in natural selection. Evolution is a fact. J.H.2012.
FinalLugiaGuardian 3 months ago
@Scraxs So, what's to say this rate has not been constant? There is no proof that it has been constant, but we have no proof that it has not. Another thing is the Earth's population. Evolutionists disagree with the possible population of the Earth in 10,000 B.C., but the usual estimates are 1-4 million. But they also believe it took 2,490,000 years for the human population to make it that high. That is simply mathematically impossible. It is a far stretch to say there were even a million then.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat "what's to say this rate has not been constant?"
NASA and ASA do. But it doesn't matter because you brought this up as the reason for your belief.
If there's no reason to assume the rate was constant, then this is clearly a not the reason you believe it (the opposite isn't my reason).
So please either give a reason to believe the rate is constant, or concede that you have no reason so I can move on to your next claim.
Scraxs 3 months ago
@Scraxs According to John A. Eddy (Harvard -Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and High Altitude Observatory in Boulder) and Aram A. Boornazian a mathematician with S. Ross and Co. in Boston, the sun is shrinking at about five feet per hour or 0.1% per century. Assuming this rate has been constant, 1 million years ago, the Earth would have been so hot that no life could have survived and less than 15 million years ago, the sun would have been touching the Earth.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat "Assuming this rate has been constant"
What reason is there to assume the rate is constant? Our Sun oscillates 9 times each century.
NASA website: /uoɔןos‾uɐɾ71/3002/ɐsɐu-ʇɐ-ǝɔuǝıɔs/sʍǝu-ǝɔuǝıɔs/ʌoƃ˙ɐsɐu˙ǝɔuǝıɔs//:dʇʇɥ
Also they never published their finding as a scientific paper. It was only an abstract. Which was then picked up by Russell Akridge who made that assumption himself for the institute of creation research.
ASA: ןɯʇɥ˙ןןıʇuɐʌ68-9ɟɔsd/6891/ɟɔsd/ɐsɐ/ƃɹo˙3ɐsɐ˙ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ
Scraxs 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian Sure, I've read about the peppered moth. Lizards can blend into their environment, that doesn't prove we evolved out of a rock over billions of years.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat First, how old do you believe the Earth is? If you believe around 6000, you won't believe we evolved.
Scraxs 3 months ago
@Sistarovat A Chameleon's ability to blend in is different. The moths changed color by changing their DNA by natural selection over several successive generations. The moth's color change wasn't by its choice and wasn't within a single animal. Instead, in each new generation of moths, the darker ones survived while the lighter ones got eaten. The result is the darker moths reproduced more. And saying we evolved from a rock is cutting it close to the Biblical story of Adam's creation. J.H.2012.
FinalLugiaGuardian 3 months ago
@Motive11331 Oh brother, so you're mad that God didn't poll you before he laid the foundations of the universe?
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian "These difficulties and objections may be classed under the following heads:—First, why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?" - Charles Darwin,
Origin of Species, Ch. 6, p133
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian "For myself, also, I rejoice profoundly; for, thinking of so many cases of men pursuing an illusion for years, often and often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may not have devoted my life to a phantasy." - Charles Darwin Letter to C. Lyell Charles Darwin,
Life and Letters, 1887, Vol. 2, p. 229
Sistarovat 3 months ago
Not bad but still voting Ron Paul
boosted321 3 months ago
@FinalLugiaGuardian Ahem, most of these men WERE alive after Darwin's fairy tale was published. Are you aware that Darwin himself expressed doubts about his lunatic theory? Suppose you believe Darwin's theory the way I believe the Bible. What convincing evidence can you present that would prove Darwin's madness to be scientific fact. And biology textbooks aren't evidence because if you count them as evidence, I could use the Bible as evidence for my belief.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat I'd rather believe that things happen by chance than through the will of a maniacal autocrat. Science is fair. God punishes people for the imperfections He gave them while supporters tout how He is "all-loving".
Motive11331 3 months ago
@Sistarovat The Founding Fathers, Madison, Franklin, Adams, Hamilton, Jay, Jefferson, and Washington all died before 1859, the year the Origin of Species was published. Not sure about the other men you mentioned. As for evidence of evolution, look at the evolution of the peppered moth. The species changed color from ivory to black when pollution turned the UK's trees black with soot. This is natural selection. As for Darwin expressing doubting his theory, where was it stated and what did he say?
FinalLugiaGuardian 3 months ago
This is the guy I hope becomes president. This is the only president I will vote for...
TearsOfWar1 3 months ago
@acmilanboi Whoa, whoa, wait a minute now. It has just been in the past sixty or so years that evolution has become mainstream in this country and this country has gotten into the mess we're in just in the past sixty years. The vast majority of our Founding Fathers were Creationists. Louis Pasteur, Samuel Morse, Charles Babbage, John Ambrose Fleming, and countless others were prominent, accomplished scientists and inventors who didn't need Darwin's fairy tale to succeed.
Sistarovat 3 months ago
@Sistarovat Of course these men were not believers in the theory of evolution. "Darwin's fairy tale," as you put it Sistarovat, had not yet been published when the USA was first founded. Call me crazy, but don't you have to have knowledge of a subject's existence before you are able to have a belief about it? You fail.
FinalLugiaGuardian 3 months ago
his purple tie worries me. but otherwise, hes very intelligent.
iamkingmoonracer 3 months ago
This guy is definately not a republican! Close loop holes? Broaden the tax base? If you close your eyes it's like you're listening to Obama.
npuchlov 3 months ago
i like him because unlike ron paul, or ricky perry
he seems smart and not a drama queen
RayWilliamJohansen 3 months ago
Huntsmen/Johnson
conex96 3 months ago
@nihsc0 exactly what I've been trying to tell people for a while now.
FinalLugiaGuardian 4 months ago
of the republican presidential candidates, this guy is definitely the best
chadwick0091 4 months ago
Seems like a pretty good candidate but he is wrong that we have never defaulted. We did several times before. The first was 1790 and then again in 1933. And between 1841 and 1842, 9 states defaulted and between 1873 and 1884 10 states defaulted which lead to many states adding a balanced budget amendment.
fojoely 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is the only logical choice for President!
Ron Paul 2012!
AlienBeliever897 4 months ago
I honestly think it is too soon to any of us to say who we're gonna vote for. I mean really, primaries are still 13 months away! People are gonna drop out between now and then, issues may change slightly. Circumstances 'will' change, that is why i haven't made up and will not make up my mind until it gets within about a month of election time. It's a personal thing and should be for all Americans. This is our Freedom we're talking about, these are our Rights. We MUST be careful who we choose.
Loveschuck87 4 months ago
I like this guy. Very eloquent speaker.
UCSDEngineerDoctor 4 months ago
A man who can speak chinese and work with the chinese government? A country who basically owns us? ummm. yes!
bballer2324ify 4 months ago
Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman. Now there is a ticket.
ghicken 4 months ago
@ghicken Paul is antiquated, and so is his policy like wanting to leave the UN. Huntsman is a pragmatist and an international expert, especially in Asia.
FinalLugiaGuardian 4 months ago
@imaginethetime register republican and vote for him in the primaries in your state
cmau14 4 months ago
Huntsman 2012
cmau14 4 months ago
If every Republican had the fiscal policy of Huntsman and the foreign policy of Ron Paul. Mmmm perfect candidate.
Trimbler00 5 months ago
Visit opdrop.com/list/17/Best-Candidate-for-President-of-the-United-States-of-America-in-2012 to tell people why you think Huntsman should be president for 2012
collosalchris 5 months ago
This country has to default. We can't keep on creating money out of thin air and solving debt by adding more debt if that keeps up the dollar will CRASH which is 100x worse than a default
streetz23 5 months ago
As an obama supporter, I like Huntsman. This guy is not a nut as everyone else in the Republican party. To me, he is more like a conservative Democrat and I wouldn't mind voting for him.
BOGOTAROCKSTAR 5 months ago
@BOGOTAROCKSTAR nice point! Huntsman has a global vision of the world! He is not as close minded as he republican peers
raoulhery 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i am from ISRAEL. you spent a lot of money for security of us in the middle east. thats why your economy was damaged. you are so stupid because we used your tax income just improve our weapons. long live ISRAEL.
saylikubac 5 months ago
Jon Huntsman isn't insane enough to get the republican vote. He believes in Evolution and Science automatically disqualifies him from winning.
MrMaverickStoedter 5 months ago
I wish Mccain would run as Republican candidate...
MrHasnodong 5 months ago
lets all get together and punch HUNTSMEN through !
HarveyGrass 5 months ago
this guy doesn't know crack from beans in terms of fiscal policy; foreign or domestic
HarveyGrass 5 months ago
john huntsman CHEEKY !!
HarveyGrass 5 months ago
Vote for the real Change! Vote for Ron Paul!
Get him through the Primary!
(Register as a Republican quick.)
Choose the Mutually Assured Respect in foreign policy!
Ron Paul - the real Change!
roger7c297 5 months ago
@roger7c297 shut up and let people think for themselves TRICK
frisco95476 5 months ago
As an observer from Australia, Huntsman is the only Republican candidate that doesn't scare me if they become President.
DrCamPhD 5 months ago
I tend to be left of center, if this guy won the nomination I'd be tempted to vote for this guy
tireironman 5 months ago
@vas13xtq WHAT? Evolution does not drive biological sciences. Biological sciences were around before Darwin's insane, unprovable theory ever made it into all the government school textbooks. If evolutioin were true, there would be millions and millions of transitional fossils from the hundreds of millions of years that evolutionism claims transitional creatures existed. Where are they? And I'm not talking about the Neanderthal man who turned out to be a human with arthritis.
Sistarovat 5 months ago
@Sistarovat No.
simonburbank 5 months ago
Comment removed
vas13xtq 5 months ago
Comment removed
vas13xtq 5 months ago
Huntsman is a political idiot. He would make a good Secretary of State, but he has no political tact whatsoever. Calling evolution a science?!? Are you freaking KIDDING me?!? Evolutionism is the stupidest and most dangerous nonsense that has ever come out of the depraved sewer of man's mind. There are roughly 50,000,000 creationists who will vote in the Republican primary and this bozo basically told them, "you're too stupid to vote for me". LOSER!!!
Sistarovat 5 months ago
@Sistarovat Are you an idiot? Really, this is a serious question. Evolution is what drives biological sciences. For an example, our total understanding of the medical field revolves around this phenomenon. Every time you go to a medical doctor, you are supporting evolution. Huntsman is the most reasonable candidate. He doesn't comment logical fallacies like the other candidates. He is the only hope for the republicans to get the presidency.
vas13xtq 5 months ago
@Sistarovat 50,000,000 creationists= 50,000,000 reasons why this country is such a mess.
acmilanboi 3 months ago
Jon Huntsman is like endangered Panda, there is very little time untill they will extinct. And one day we will talk about these funny species and hardly believe they ever existed. Republican who supports science and evolution, ha - was he also an atheist? lol
Lius525 5 months ago
@Lius525 *like* ;-)
akinkhoo 5 months ago
@Lius525 I'm an Obama supporter, but if I had to vote for Republican, it would be Jon Huntsman. He's the only Republican running who is sane. I do disagree with your implication that christians don't believe in science and evolution. Most of us do. Not all of us who are christians, think like Rick Perry. Huntsman is like most people of faith in America. We believe in God AND Evolution. It's not an "either, or" thing.
Velayasha 5 months ago
I don't like obama but NOT vote for a Rick Perry type tea party guy. Huntsman is the type of GOP I was until Bush followed by Palin started running me out of the party.
I actually want a guy with intelligence as President
Cuffsmaster 5 months ago
@Cuffsmaster I am a liberal - NOT a Democrat, I don't think they're liberals anymore - and I tend to like John Huntsman, but the reasons for my liking him are a bit troubling. I find myself saying, "boy it's refreshing to hear a Republican who thinks that Earth is older than 6,000 years. Boy! it's nice to find a Republican who doesn't think rape victims ought to give birth to rape babies." If the conservative candidates won't wake up, the conservative voters have to wake them.
CitizenMusicUSA 5 months ago
@CitizenMusicUSA the South (in USA) if full of voters that think Perry is wonderful. Hell his first stop in South Carolina to speak was Liberty University. They think the earth is 6000 years old and teach that crap.
I agree with you it is refreshing
Cuffsmaster 5 months ago
It's really nice to see a moderate republican this time around. The most ridiculous thing though and a bit of proof that this is a broken political system, is that in spite of his record his centrist rationality will probably kill his chance for nomination.
NateH2121 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul 2012
RioArmare 5 months ago
most electable candidate
class act too
CearaQC 5 months ago
He's so rational that if he loses the Republican Nomination he will most likely vote for the next most rational person: Obama
Crimsonphilosophy 5 months ago
@Crimsonphilosophy Obama is the least rational person alive. He advocates economic policy that has been disproven in Japan and Spain and even here in America. He fails to live in a reality that the economy is controlled by businesses both small and large and that the only way it will get better is to work with them. The mandates, corruption, and blatant class warfare is wasting the very small window we have left before our currency collapses under the weight of our ever growing debt.
charleshoskinson 5 months ago
wooooo.... someone who knows there is a middle ground?!?!
UsnRoberts 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012
CandyLaStar 6 months ago
Huntsman is definitly the best (at least the most electable) of the GOP Candidates right now. He could give Obama a good challenge. Huntsman is also not crazy like Palin, Pual, or Bachman. Here's hoping more GOP moderates vote in the GOP primaries this time.
FinalLugiaGuardian 6 months ago