The guy is not presenting a accurate representation of typical controlled demolitions. Go to YouTube: Implosionworld Explosive Demolition Compilation 2003. Pay attention to the tremendous noise demolitions make. Incidentally Implosion World says no controlled demolitions took place on 9/11. They are the world's leading researchers of controlled demolitions. It is time to move over to Dr. Judy Wood's research.
@NotableJInx2 9/11 Truth has been hijacked by the 'demolitionists'; who believe somehow a team of blasters wired up all the seven buildings of the WTC with over 65 miles of det cord and silently imploded the buildings - and did this without leaving any seismic evidence (P and S waves)!
If people were asked if a controlled demolition crew could drop those building straight down without either of them falling to the side, people would have said no freakin' way. How is it that people cannot see that this beautifully organized collapse is not AT LEAST possibly a controlled demolition? I watched many demo lotions in my life and some in person in Las Vegas. I remember seeing it on the news, hearing them say the planes caused the collapse, but the second I saw it I said that's a demo
@baby5968 Had something to do with the Enron scandal, & documents held there by the FBI Or CIA 1 or the other. now hundreds are no longer in jeopardy of jail because of it, which is why no one followed Martha to prison.
Richard Gage LMAO.. "This is a controlled demolition"
Yeah, only one flaw...where is the demolition sequence with the loud blasts, nutjob? Because of the absence of actual sonic evidence of an explosive demolition, thesemorons decided to introduce the theory of magical "nano-thermite".
@NotableJInx2 you do realize there are silent bombs used in controlled demo. scientific evidence has shown fragments of chemicals used in such bombs to be found in the area of explosion. Face it. This is controlled demo. No way would a plane make the building fall down. also firefighter who had been at the sight said they kept hearing quiet explosives that were set off simultaneously, which is the way controlled demolition works
Umm..just a problem here. If it was silent bombs, then why does Richard Gage so stubbornly cite firefighters's statements of having heard loud explosions as evidence of controlled demolition?
And no, silent bombs do not exist. Bombs create detonations, which creates air pressure. Given the fact that the earth has an atmosphere, this air pressure creates sound waves.
You kinda confirm my conclusion that truthers have NO FUCKING CLUE about physics. Thank you.
look at this and then decide for yourself if it was a controlled demolition. 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked. look it up on youtube. it will be the first video. watch the whole thing.
@sk8erguy190 because your government is evil and want to invade middle east countries to take our oil? Why did you think they pin the blame on the iraqis
I guess everyone forgot about when the US was going to fake attacks on Cuba to start a war with them. signed government documents that said they were going to do so. look it up. what makes you think they didnt do the same thing here, but actually go through with it and keep it under the table. WAKE UP HUMANITY!
The most important thing about this video is how they don't play the audio from the REAL demolitions. Instead they just have the audio of the guy talking the whole time. Can anybody tell me why they did this? Because REAL controlled demolitions are LOUD AS HELL! The explosive charges used in demolition work can be heard for tens of miles. So why did the towers fall so quietly? I mean really... anyone near the base of the tower should have gone deaf from the blasting...
Firstly, i want to say that i believe this definitely was an inside job however one thing i struggle to understand is why they chose a controlled demolition. The US government almost certainly has certain technologies that the public don't know about and along with that, they have an incredible amount of money. So why choose a demolition? why didn't they use maybe 6 planes to make the collapses to appear to be more possible?? There must be something more.
@free533 No. Just because my opinion differs from yours doesn't mean I am "in denial", have my head in the sand, need to wake up, have no idea of what I am talking about or am an idiot. It simply means I have looked over the facts and I don't subscribe to the theories from you people.
This is not a hard concept to understand. Your people don't get it though. You're the epitome of hypocrisy, preaching for others to ask questions to what they're told but God forbid they should ever question you.
@StoneColdChewy clearly you haven't looked at the facts. I totally understand that people have their own opinions and i accept that. Not everyone must agree with what i think however if you have even just looked at the visual of building 7 falling, let alone the facts, then you wouldn't still think that it wasn't brought down by explosives.
@StoneColdChewy - Well how do you explain in your own mind the collapse of tower 7 at in 5 seconds? Putting aside that towers one and two both made of steel just failed from top to bottom because of a fire on their upper floors.
@christiantruther86bv Do you have any idea how full of shit you are? No I get it... you think all the towers fell at a free fall speed and that it is evidence that only a controlled demo was possible. But there are two flaws with your story... The first is that even a controlled demo cannot fall at free fall speed. There is allways some resistance to EVERY collapse. Secondly the timing you provide is how long it took to dissapear under the debris cloud... not to reach the ground.
@MrAwsome514 No free fall? Then why does NIST admit that there is? Seems that you're smarter than NIST bro, they should have hired you.
As far as the noise, yes, explosives like RDX is loud as hell. But truth seekers aren't saying RDX or other more traditional demolition explosives was used, but more than likely it was nano-thermite.. which was found in the dust samples by independent studies. But NIST didn't test for that either, nor explain why they didn't.
@bluerap04 NIST states specifically that tower 7 (And ONLY tower 7) attained NEAR freefall (not full freefall) speed for 2.2 seconds during it's collapse. It took far longer then 2.2 seconds for tower 7 to collapse and this 2.2 second period of elevated acceleration is explained. If you watch the penthouse collapsed into the building 8 seconds before the rest of tower 7 collapsed. This created a hollow cavity within the building which helped accelerate the collapse during those 2.2 seconds.
@bluerap04 By the way NIST has allready explained why they didn't test for explosives or thermite Preliminary testing showed no evidence that there was any and they had no reason to believe there could have been. Infact asfar as I can tell there are no legitimate findings which show any evidence for thermite or explosives from any source. Infact from what I have seen these findings are no more then a rumor spread by truthers.
@christiantruther86bv It was closer to 20 seconds than 5. See this YouTube video: /watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk
As for your other comment, do you understand that it was more than just "a fire on their upper floors"? When the airplanes hit both buildings it resulted in the compromising of their structural integrity. Once the steel bent inwards a collapse was inevitable due to gravity.
The day somebody shows me a video of a building collapsing symmetrically from a "fire" like Building 7, i'll shut up. Until then, without question a controlled demolition. Even if there was a fire in every room, burning at the same time, ignited at the same time this could NEVER happen, period.
Yeah! I figured that the buildings would have fallen over too! Like at the base of the crash the building would lean in that direction and fall over from the top. It doesn't make any sense for the buildings to fall straight down.
Yes they will.... the U.S. govt doesnt give a flying fuck about its people... the best example is war... the people who control the country are willing to send other people to die when their own families are NOT serving in the military
It was 99.9% controlled... Not 100% because it could well of been a terorist attack, it was very well done by the american goverment... Their president was calm when it happened "to make sure the kids didnt get scared that he was reading a book to" yeah right?.. Every presedant/primeinister of a country would scared and shocked, and the syncronised booming noise's?... It adds up!
oh wow! i cannot believ that someone will do controlled demolition with the people inside the building to make it look like an attack. OMG! Is this really true???!!!
I really hope the guilt lives in them till they break (those who were behind 911. cause.. honestly, i was fooled in the beginning but i been researching and it wasnt just an attack) Too many things, coincidenses. Bastards hopefuly will rot with their slaying.
Fires in all 3 buildings were asymmetric. Asymmetric damage cannot cause a symmetric collapse, simple physics. This is why demolition is a careful process, it's very hard to bring down a structure symmetrically.
Nanothermite was detected in ample amounts in WTC dust. Only 3 explanations are possible: volcanic activity, proximity to a hot star like the sun & explosives. The first 2 causes can be ruled out. By deductive reasoning, this leaves the 3rd, however much we may not like the conclusion.
@InfiniteGUNRR Right... Tell mesomething smart guy. Why would the towers need to be brought down in a controlled manner? I mean the goal was to kill a bunch of people right? I would imagine that would mean having the tower fall over would be better as it would cause more damage and thus, since you believe this was done to justify going to war, would have made for a much better and more believable piece of work.
@MrAwsome514You need to study up buddy. The CIA wanted a blowback. The U.S. purposly went to the middle east and invaded so they would retaliate. This is the truth now listen up. The CIA already had Intel that showed there was going to be a terrorist attack on the WTC. They put explosives on the key structural points in the WTC. They waited for the plains to hit and then they went with the contolled demolition. and building 7 fell straight down aswell (controlled). EVERY building fell perfectly
@InfiniteGUNRR The collapse began as a vertical fall. As the tower sank below it's debris cloud the falling portion tilted and then rolled into another building. If it was a controlled demolition it was one hell of a sloppy job. Also we did not invade anyone in response to 9/11... We sent troops into pakistan to search for and eliminate terrorist cells WITH THE HELP OF THE PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT. The only invasion that occured was with iraq which was in response to EUROPEAN intel involving WMDs.
@MrAwsome514 You dont understand. America used 9/11 as an excuse to invade. The Pakistani gov. believed us. They believed we needed thier help. And anyway if the Pakistani gov. said "no were not gona help you get out of our country" we would have just shot them anyway cause were america Were the worlds biggest assholes. We do what ever the fuck it is that we wana do.
@InfiniteGUNRR We never invaded pakistan... An invasion is against a nation. Our actions were purely against the terrorists. So you are litterally saying that they created a hoax to go after a fake terrorist cell that they made up during the hoax? You don't see any problem with that logic? Are you insane?
@MrAwsome514 Your misunderstanding. We first went into the middle east to provoke confilct. Before 9/11 we had already gone over there. The U.S. didnt tell the public... why? so when 9/11 happened it looked like a random attack on the U.S. The U.S. used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq for Oil (The Bush family is one of the biggest families in the oil industry) And it was also an excuse to take away our rights. Example *Patriot Act*. One of the most unconstitutional bills ever.
@InfiniteGUNRR Do the dates March 19–May 1, 2003 mean anything to you? It should... Those are the dates that we invaded iraq. Hmm nearly 2 years after 9/11... Oh but yea sure we definately whent there completely because of 9/11 huh. Maybe you are too young (or stupid) to remember but by 2003 most people were well enough over 9/11 not to want us to just leap into war.
@MrAwsome514 And also they didnt want to destroy that much because of the $Cost$. They needed something really bad to happen but not that bad. Its just an excuse to go to war. War=Profit. Debt=Profit. There is a video of cops standing outside of the WTC before it was hit telling civilians to "STAND BACK ITS GONA BLOW"... Truth is stranger then fiction
@christiantruther86bv America faked the german attack on the lusitania to get into WWII. America faked attacks on Cuba to start a war with them. America went into Vietman not to defeat them but to have a stagnent war (longlasting). America faked terrorist attacks so they would have an excuse to invade the middle east for oil. You may ask why? Well its very very simple. WAR = PROFIT
@InfiniteGUNRR - And most people don't know all this because of all the propaganda. Or they do but there to afraid to say anything. And allot of people just don't care unfortunately.
We can't take it anymore. The people of America need to stand up.
this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing
This Muslim pipe dream of "controlled demolition" is not even conjecture; It's pure stupidity to suggest that American could or would have blown up its own buildings. Simply laughable.
With the number of witnesses and footage, this can't be so. The sound generated by a controlled demolition would echo with enormous power that EVERYONE would hear.
First off, the explosions generated by controlled demolition are unmistakable. If you're anywhere near it, you know what's happening. Then take 9/11. Only a handful of people claim to hear explosions. If this were the case, then there would have to be a non-stop stream of explosions to take down buildings of that size.
@Abstruse23 People on the scenes of Legal controlled demolitions are always informed so they would be expecting the explosions, and they'd naturally listen for those explosions. When you're on site of a disaster zone such as 911, 99.9% of the people would be in panic/fears/despair/shock/sorrow/anxiety, you can't possibly be paying attention to anything. Except those on the very front lines of the disaster, the explosions would be too heart-pounding not to notice. Debunkers, try harder. ;)
That may be true for witnesses. What about all documented footage? Microphones don't experience the "panic/fears/despair/shock/sorrow/anxiety" you speak of.
If one picture is worth a thousand words, then one video is worth a hundred thousand words.
I like the repetition. It relentlessly drives home the hard facts that so many sheeple are resisting with all their might and try desperately to rationalize away.
This is stupid. Look at the bottom of the buildings when they are destroyed by controlled demolition. They have an explosion at the base of the buildings, causing the entire building to fall on itself. Now look at 9/11. these buildings do not have an explosion at the bottom. The entire building does not fall on itself. The only movement in the building is from the very top, then it collapses down onto the rest of the tower. Not a controlled demolition. easy as that.
@sch3ffs there are witnesses that say they heard explosions near the base of the tower and then there is the footage of the blasts occurring below the impact point and before the point at which the tower rapidly falls on itself in a cascading fashion. i mean i don't know if i really believe in this stuff but it's very interesting.
The tv controls everything that has to do with government on the tv in what we see when we see it and its easy to know this if you like ever news site on face book or twitter they all post the same stuff at same times about governmental stuff going on there for we are not seeing anything more then what are government wants us to see about them through the media and the media controls most of are population of what we think is going on meaning they are not showing us the serious stuff why?
But there's a big difference between the demolitions and the WTC tower collapses. The buildings being demolished collapse into their footprint, whereas the tower collapses start from the top, where the plane hit.
All the controlled demolition buildings collapse from the bottom, with the bottom floor being equally affected as the top one at the time the explosives go off. The WTC footage clearly shows it collapsing from the point of impact, with each floor hitting the next.
So, please tell me what hit WTC 7 building again? There is no fixed rule that says those delay Cutter Charges have to synchronize from Bottom to Top either in order to bring down any buildings!! >=)
Proof that Thermite can cut a vertical column....
v=jpPNRrylH00
Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7....
v=hZEvA8BCoBw
Immortal Technique - Bush Knocked Down The Towers....
v=VYAjsALTTgU
BTW, why hide evidences of 9/11 afterward? What R U Spin Doctors afraid of!? =/
@IronJackalTw Nothing hit WTC7. And you're correct, the cutter charges could have been programmed to go off exactly as you'd expect from a collapsing skyscraper, but it seems like a big leap of logic. Something matches a fire collapse 100% and I conclude it's a complicated setup made to mimic a fire collapse?
WTC 2 & WTC 1 have Pre-Rigged Explosives near Point of Impact along with many Synchronized Time-Delay Cutter Charges! That's WHY they goes down a bit different than WTC 7, but they still all fall on their own footprint into fine dust!! {roll my eyes}
Frank A. DeMartini....
v=sO1JxpVb2eU
Tomahawk Missile....
v=th9sduUBmfs
USA Government & Military have TECHNOLOGY & KNOW-HOW to carry off that 9/11 False Flag Operation easily even if Arab Hijackers can't pilot any Jumbo Jets!! =/
@lughcious Well if you watch the north tower collapse you see flashes while it collapse plus the sun wasnt on that side so it cant be reflections, when you see dust shooting out the north and south tower they say its the floors collapsing on each other, then how come out of one window? What about the one on the 30 floor that shot out when they begin to collapse? Why did wtc 7 collapse straight down?It wasnt hit by a plane ppl say it was hit by fallin debris so was wtc 3,4,5,6 they didnt collapse
First of all, I know that fire didn't cause the Unprecedented Spontaneous Demolitions of Three Skyscrapers on September 11
To pressurize water and push it up the towers, they use compressed air tanks. It is possibly these tanks responsible for the expulsions out the sides. Notice, none are accompanied by flame.
Where is the video which you allege shows charge flashes in the North Tower as it turns to dust in mid air?
@onefodderunit This video /watch?v=913Am7ZScVM and this video /watch?v=xu_qct5gp-M
Ok we all know the twin towers collapsed due to fire they claim but what about wtc 7? It was on fire burned for 7 hours but these three buildings were the first in history to collapse due to fire, there were buildings i seen look like hell the whole building was on fire it wad also a skyscraper and temps was more hot then the twin towers but some how the temps in the twin towers went up to 2600 degrees how?
Those videos are a joke. That's why they're rated down. You're a time waster. Every video shows the Twin Towers turn to dust in mid air. They came apar at a molecular level, except for the aluminum exterior panels used for aesthetics, which fluttered down.
1. What energy holds atomic particles together, i.e; The electrons orbiting around the nucleus?
2. What type of explosives do you theorize were used?
@onefodderunit They rated down by ppl who dont believe the conspiracy, those buildings were designed to not fully collapse, those lines that go around the building are there to stop the collapse if happen they were made into three sections, like NIST say its impossible to get those temperatures in those buildings, when they got proof they didnt answer back, how can those temperatures get so high? Nobody knows that said no cutter charges were used, where is the core?
@onefodderunit@onefodderunit thats a good question, idk lol They say the dust is from the floors slamming down on each other pulverizing the concrete, if these pancaked on each other that would leave the core behind still standing, im not great with science material, they say cutter charges were placed on the joints, they say how can thousands of joints snap at the blink of an eye? Idk how you can spot cutter charges, watch this video. /watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
@onefodderunit Control demolitions take place throughout the building mostly the bottom floors thats why it collapse straight down, the reason for the twin towers turning to dust in mid air is because well first the impact site was in the air lol, ppl that were there said mulitple explosions were heard before the collapse, idk what explosives they used ppl say cutter charges but idk what cutters are capable of
@onefodderunit why would i laugh at that? Im laughing at that question, once again there is no vid because the impact zone wasnt in the air, these were massive buildings, they had to make it to where this time the firefighters cant tame the fire like they did back in 1993 when it was in the basements
Now you're talking pure jibberish. There are tons of building demo videos. Can you admit that you can't find a single one in which the structure turns to dust in mid air, as both the Twin Towers did - Yes or No?
Your answer is No, because "cutter charges" weren't used.
The force which holds atoms together was disrupted by an external force. You're incapable of grasping this concept?
@onefodderunit why would a building turn to dust in a video besides 911? These are massive buildings with concrete on each floor, theres a hole in the building where it impact, no other video had buildings nvm you won idk i really dont im going off what other ppl say, can you explain why wtc 7 collapsed? And ww2 ? Aint ppl saying it was fake? It was started by our own ppl that bombed a ship and they blamed it on somebody?
@onefodderunit Cutter charges can weaken a huge building like that, then it collapse as the building collapses the cutters are going off below the falling debris so when the collapsing zone reaches that point it would keep going and wont stop, and WWII i wouldnt know back in high school i didnt pay attention, didnt they gas them to kill them ?
@onefodderunit Im not ignorant, i just have no knowledge on that stuff, the reason i saying stuff about 911 being inside job because when i believed it was terrorist everybody got on me made good points, i thought they knew what they werre talking about, why did those buildings collapse so fast
And this bit of comedy: "Im not ignorant, i just have no knowledge on that stuff"
Demo charges or thermite/mate don't turn buildings into dust in mid air. Directed Energy Weapons, about which you are completely ignorant, are already in use, and openly.
Molten means liquid. You can't pick it up with a claw. If there was hot molten steel in the rubble, workers would not have been able to enter the basements or walk on the pile. The machines wouldn't have functioned. Other forces can disrupt the force that holds atoms together. The force which you admit you're clueless about.
Fucking brainwash "THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION"
He explained clearly on WHY that WTC 7, WTC 2, & WTC 1 R Controlled Demolitions, but U R too RETARDED like Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome BABY to get it!! >=)
George Carlin - The American Dream....
v=acLW1vFO-2Q
George Carlin - We Like War....
v=sDkhzHQO7jY
George Carlin comments on 9/11 Truth and the NWO....
v=pow5_UYKaJ8
Biggest BRAINWASHING R from Mainstream MASS MEDIA owned by Zionist CHRISTIAN Dick Cheney JEWS & controlled by Whitey CHRISTIAN Ted Haggard FAGGOTS!! >=P
@BladeJones- read the comments right. Research properties of steel and jet fuel. I'm not arguing either side, just stating the facts. Oh, and since you said to "look up" the temperature at which steel loses 50% of it's strength here it is: NO WHERE FUCKING NEAR 600 DEGREES! And this isn't Muslim gibberish. I think 6 1/2 years of active duty gives me the right to "state the facts".
Melt? Why don't you look up at what temperature steel loses half it's strength? 500 - 600? LOL. Then research at what temperature jet burns. My OVEN in my kitchen gets that hot. You are a certified idiot.
Did any of you morons notice that 747's full of jet fuel hit the towers??? Also what is a 102 story building collapse SUPPOSED to look like when jet fuel weakens the steel by 50%? This is the 1st time this has ever happened? All of this conspiracy nonsense is Muslim gibberish.
@BladeJones According to the conspiracy cheerleaders, the twin towers were apparently designed to withstand a direct hit from a nuclear missle by the way they talk about it.
Oh, and you can also demolish two of the largest buildings on the planet without a single bit of sound from the explosives.
@dshiznit148 Thermal imaging don't lie. It showed that temps were over 800 degrees. Hot enough to weaken that steel -- Or for all of you conspiracy Scientologists, hot enough to ignite blast caps and explosives! If George Bush and Elvis snuck in the night before then why didn't their demolition explosives level the buildings on impact????!!!!! It took a few HOURS for the explosives to finally ignite in 800 + degree heat! LOL
what I see in the controlled demolition, as compared to the twin towers collapse, is that the charges in a CD tend to start from the bottom, not the top. I am not a demolition expert, but it seems more logical that the puffs of smoke coming out of the sides of the building are from the air pressure from the subsequent floors collapsing on each other. But I have to admit that it still seems strange that the damaged parts don't simply keel over.
Are u sayin that controlled demolition can ONLY ever start from the bottom or lowest floor? lol It can start in the middle, the side, the outside, the inside, the interrior, the upper level, even the roof top
it all depends on what u want to do. Hence why its called controlled demolition
There have been hundreds of 'puffs' of smoke documented across the twin towers durin 9/11 before and durin the towers collapse
So if i blow out a buildin startin from the top right corner, that is NOT controlled demolition? That just some fire? right... only a naive fool would say such a thing
@swu880 I'm not saying that, again, I'm not a demolition expert. I'm just reporting what I see on the video, and that are all demolitions starting from the ground, which contrasts with the twin towers collapse.
I love how the moron who made this turned off the sound to all the actual controlled demolitions so you couldn't here all the loud ass explosions that are made when actual explosives go off. The towers collapsing started with no loud explosions like that. The reporter on scene for Good Morning America even said he heard a "rumbling" and then collapse from four blocks away....not a series of loud explosions which is actually necessary.
I really like the way you used fellow architect Richard Gage's observation that "This is a controlled demolition" to drive home the point, again and again and again.
Relentless repetition is a valuable rhetorical device. There are times when it is essential. This is one of them.
Too many people refuse to admit that WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 could only have been controlled demolitions.
@technical1234567 The people who built it said the biggest plane could hit it and it would not collapse; that was in the late 60's early 70's era of "the worlds biggest plane". They didn't think that someone would intentionally ram up the engines to more power than ever and fly straight into a the WTC on purpose. Planes that hit WTC had a wingspand almost as wide as building. Once hit, destroyed alot of concrete and steel in the process thus putting more weight on smaller areas in the buildings.
@technical1234567 im not saying it did but yes why would the government go hmm.. what would really fuck up the financial situation all over the globe OH i know lets blow up the world trade center GREAT IDEA no! why what was the governments motvie then?
this is idiotic if it was a controlled demolition how do you explain the two planes smashing into the sides of the building thats really controlled ye! o.o
The thing is the WTC exploded from the top not the bottom of the building. So, there is no way that it was going to tip over becasue the bottom of the building is unharmed which makes it stable. But, not for long.
They realized the planes didn't bring it down. So it had to come down, but for added effect, bombs were placed to bring both down. Idk who's idea it was , but someone WILL find all of you responsible.
I really get annoyed about all of this 9/11 conspiracy bull shit. When you have a gaping hole all the way through a building with temperatures that reach over 1,000 degrees F, all that weight above the hole is pushing down on the melting steel beams, the building is going to go down. What your saying in video is that when the WTC collapsed, it went straight down like a controlled demolition, FALSE top part on south tower went side ways and when both buildings fell they damaged other buildings.
@cds587 why building 7 fell then ? why reporters, firefighters and eyewitnesses said there were bombs going off ? this guy was running down the stairs to exit the building , and the wall blew up in his face killing people he survived , what caused that ?
@27thlegion Did you ever hear of the term bending, because a heavy structure does not have to have the steel melted in order to fall. The massive weight of the to part of the building had extreme temperatures NOT to melt the steel but to bend it due to thousands and thousands of tons and heated steel.
This video proves the point it's trying to refute. Look at the Twin Towers.. they didn't come down in a controlled way. In a controlled demolition the building falls all at once. The Twin Towers collapsed where the planes hit, and then the rest pancaked. It didn't come down all at once.
If it was a controlled demolition why weren't all the people that worked in the buildings not told to about it? You'd think that something that big would be announced to the employees so that way no one would go to work that day and end up injured or dead; although so many lives were lost due to human ignorance.
@AoyagiKiyoka they were trying to have war with iran, so they can get more oil, so they did this to make the public have war with the middle east, but people would get angry and say why have war with them, and start protests. so they want the citizens to pour their money into the war. conclusion america is bad and greedy!!
@AoyagiKiyoka Nobody would tell the employees to not go to work at the WTC that day because then obviously everybody would know it was planned. If the government were to plan something this immense and tragic they would do it with perfect plans, ideas, and people. Don't you think it would be a LITTLE suspicious if EVERY employee was notified that these buildings were going to be demolished? just a little?
obvious controlled demolition the question is who controlled it?
SonOfTheMorning 4 days ago
The guy is not presenting a accurate representation of typical controlled demolitions. Go to YouTube: Implosionworld Explosive Demolition Compilation 2003. Pay attention to the tremendous noise demolitions make. Incidentally Implosion World says no controlled demolitions took place on 9/11. They are the world's leading researchers of controlled demolitions. It is time to move over to Dr. Judy Wood's research.
mujaku 6 days ago
Face it. The truth movement doesn't give a shit about the truth. 9/11 Truth = Lies.
NotableJInx2 1 week ago
@NotableJInx2 9/11 Truth has been hijacked by the 'demolitionists'; who believe somehow a team of blasters wired up all the seven buildings of the WTC with over 65 miles of det cord and silently imploded the buildings - and did this without leaving any seismic evidence (P and S waves)!
mujaku 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If people were asked if a controlled demolition crew could drop those building straight down without either of them falling to the side, people would have said no freakin' way. How is it that people cannot see that this beautifully organized collapse is not AT LEAST possibly a controlled demolition? I watched many demo lotions in my life and some in person in Las Vegas. I remember seeing it on the news, hearing them say the planes caused the collapse, but the second I saw it I said that's a demo
socialgangster 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why wtc 7? I wonder why they wanted to bring that one down
baby5968 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@baby5968 Had something to do with the Enron scandal, & documents held there by the FBI Or CIA 1 or the other. now hundreds are no longer in jeopardy of jail because of it, which is why no one followed Martha to prison.
Snowman374th 1 week ago
Richard Gage LMAO.. "This is a controlled demolition"
Yeah, only one flaw...where is the demolition sequence with the loud blasts, nutjob? Because of the absence of actual sonic evidence of an explosive demolition, thesemorons decided to introduce the theory of magical "nano-thermite".
NotableJInx2 2 weeks ago
@NotableJInx2 you do realize there are silent bombs used in controlled demo. scientific evidence has shown fragments of chemicals used in such bombs to be found in the area of explosion. Face it. This is controlled demo. No way would a plane make the building fall down. also firefighter who had been at the sight said they kept hearing quiet explosives that were set off simultaneously, which is the way controlled demolition works
Cruchto 1 week ago
@Cruchto
Umm..just a problem here. If it was silent bombs, then why does Richard Gage so stubbornly cite firefighters's statements of having heard loud explosions as evidence of controlled demolition?
And no, silent bombs do not exist. Bombs create detonations, which creates air pressure. Given the fact that the earth has an atmosphere, this air pressure creates sound waves.
You kinda confirm my conclusion that truthers have NO FUCKING CLUE about physics. Thank you.
NotableJInx2 1 week ago
look at this and then decide for yourself if it was a controlled demolition. 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked. look it up on youtube. it will be the first video. watch the whole thing.
semsters 2 weeks ago
I got sick and tired of that man saying this is a controlled demolition. Jesus Christ Alright already !!!
sdsvfgs9 3 weeks ago
This might be the most annoying, repetitive video on youtube.
pearlmax 3 weeks ago
I'm not saying the towers weren't control demolished but can somebody explain why somebody would do that?
sk8erguy190 4 weeks ago
@sk8erguy190 Money.
GL4dia70r 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sk8erguy190 because your government is evil and want to invade middle east countries to take our oil? Why did you think they pin the blame on the iraqis
Cruchto 1 week ago
I guess everyone forgot about when the US was going to fake attacks on Cuba to start a war with them. signed government documents that said they were going to do so. look it up. what makes you think they didnt do the same thing here, but actually go through with it and keep it under the table. WAKE UP HUMANITY!
kylerpoo 1 month ago
The most important thing about this video is how they don't play the audio from the REAL demolitions. Instead they just have the audio of the guy talking the whole time. Can anybody tell me why they did this? Because REAL controlled demolitions are LOUD AS HELL! The explosive charges used in demolition work can be heard for tens of miles. So why did the towers fall so quietly? I mean really... anyone near the base of the tower should have gone deaf from the blasting...
MrAwsome514 1 month ago 8
Firstly, i want to say that i believe this definitely was an inside job however one thing i struggle to understand is why they chose a controlled demolition. The US government almost certainly has certain technologies that the public don't know about and along with that, they have an incredible amount of money. So why choose a demolition? why didn't they use maybe 6 planes to make the collapses to appear to be more possible?? There must be something more.
is it because they think we're stupid?
free533 1 month ago
There is no doubt in my mind that WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 DID NOT fall because of controlled demolition. This video is further proof of that fact.
StoneColdChewy 1 month ago
@StoneColdChewy you sir, are in denial. that's all.
free533 1 month ago
@free533 No. Just because my opinion differs from yours doesn't mean I am "in denial", have my head in the sand, need to wake up, have no idea of what I am talking about or am an idiot. It simply means I have looked over the facts and I don't subscribe to the theories from you people.
This is not a hard concept to understand. Your people don't get it though. You're the epitome of hypocrisy, preaching for others to ask questions to what they're told but God forbid they should ever question you.
StoneColdChewy 1 month ago
@StoneColdChewy clearly you haven't looked at the facts. I totally understand that people have their own opinions and i accept that. Not everyone must agree with what i think however if you have even just looked at the visual of building 7 falling, let alone the facts, then you wouldn't still think that it wasn't brought down by explosives.
free533 1 month ago
@StoneColdChewy - Well how do you explain in your own mind the collapse of tower 7 at in 5 seconds? Putting aside that towers one and two both made of steel just failed from top to bottom because of a fire on their upper floors.
christiantruther86bv 1 month ago
@christiantruther86bv Do you have any idea how full of shit you are? No I get it... you think all the towers fell at a free fall speed and that it is evidence that only a controlled demo was possible. But there are two flaws with your story... The first is that even a controlled demo cannot fall at free fall speed. There is allways some resistance to EVERY collapse. Secondly the timing you provide is how long it took to dissapear under the debris cloud... not to reach the ground.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago 2
@MrAwsome514 No free fall? Then why does NIST admit that there is? Seems that you're smarter than NIST bro, they should have hired you.
As far as the noise, yes, explosives like RDX is loud as hell. But truth seekers aren't saying RDX or other more traditional demolition explosives was used, but more than likely it was nano-thermite.. which was found in the dust samples by independent studies. But NIST didn't test for that either, nor explain why they didn't.
You need new debunking material.
bluerap04 5 days ago
@bluerap04 NIST states specifically that tower 7 (And ONLY tower 7) attained NEAR freefall (not full freefall) speed for 2.2 seconds during it's collapse. It took far longer then 2.2 seconds for tower 7 to collapse and this 2.2 second period of elevated acceleration is explained. If you watch the penthouse collapsed into the building 8 seconds before the rest of tower 7 collapsed. This created a hollow cavity within the building which helped accelerate the collapse during those 2.2 seconds.
MrAwsome514 4 days ago
@bluerap04 By the way NIST has allready explained why they didn't test for explosives or thermite Preliminary testing showed no evidence that there was any and they had no reason to believe there could have been. Infact asfar as I can tell there are no legitimate findings which show any evidence for thermite or explosives from any source. Infact from what I have seen these findings are no more then a rumor spread by truthers.
MrAwsome514 4 days ago
@christiantruther86bv It was closer to 20 seconds than 5. See this YouTube video: /watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk
As for your other comment, do you understand that it was more than just "a fire on their upper floors"? When the airplanes hit both buildings it resulted in the compromising of their structural integrity. Once the steel bent inwards a collapse was inevitable due to gravity.
StoneColdChewy 1 month ago
The day somebody shows me a video of a building collapsing symmetrically from a "fire" like Building 7, i'll shut up. Until then, without question a controlled demolition. Even if there was a fire in every room, burning at the same time, ignited at the same time this could NEVER happen, period.
skyrimarama 1 month ago
Yeah! I figured that the buildings would have fallen over too! Like at the base of the crash the building would lean in that direction and fall over from the top. It doesn't make any sense for the buildings to fall straight down.
lasoogneypubes 2 months ago
Obviously the WTC was brought down with explosives.
KolombianNecktie 2 months ago
@goldygirl78
Yes they will.... the U.S. govt doesnt give a flying fuck about its people... the best example is war... the people who control the country are willing to send other people to die when their own families are NOT serving in the military
immortalium 2 months ago
It was 99.9% controlled... Not 100% because it could well of been a terorist attack, it was very well done by the american goverment... Their president was calm when it happened "to make sure the kids didnt get scared that he was reading a book to" yeah right?.. Every presedant/primeinister of a country would scared and shocked, and the syncronised booming noise's?... It adds up!
TheUnkownTreePerson 2 months ago
oh wow! i cannot believ that someone will do controlled demolition with the people inside the building to make it look like an attack. OMG! Is this really true???!!!
goldygirl78 2 months ago
"This is a controlled demolition" "This is a controlled demolition" STFU!!!!!!!
Instinct869 3 months ago
Makes you wonder why it was only the wtcs that went, several buildings around, as far as wtc7 was, but only those specific.
smeganrocks87 3 months ago
I really hope the guilt lives in them till they break (those who were behind 911. cause.. honestly, i was fooled in the beginning but i been researching and it wasnt just an attack) Too many things, coincidenses. Bastards hopefuly will rot with their slaying.
smeganrocks87 3 months ago
Fires in all 3 buildings were asymmetric. Asymmetric damage cannot cause a symmetric collapse, simple physics. This is why demolition is a careful process, it's very hard to bring down a structure symmetrically.
Nanothermite was detected in ample amounts in WTC dust. Only 3 explanations are possible: volcanic activity, proximity to a hot star like the sun & explosives. The first 2 causes can be ruled out. By deductive reasoning, this leaves the 3rd, however much we may not like the conclusion.
jtking2504 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was undoubtedly a controlled demolition. And a very very well controlled one. Each building came straight down.
InfiniteGUNRR 3 months ago 17
@InfiniteGUNRR Right... Tell mesomething smart guy. Why would the towers need to be brought down in a controlled manner? I mean the goal was to kill a bunch of people right? I would imagine that would mean having the tower fall over would be better as it would cause more damage and thus, since you believe this was done to justify going to war, would have made for a much better and more believable piece of work.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514You need to study up buddy. The CIA wanted a blowback. The U.S. purposly went to the middle east and invaded so they would retaliate. This is the truth now listen up. The CIA already had Intel that showed there was going to be a terrorist attack on the WTC. They put explosives on the key structural points in the WTC. They waited for the plains to hit and then they went with the contolled demolition. and building 7 fell straight down aswell (controlled). EVERY building fell perfectly
InfiniteGUNRR 1 month ago
@InfiniteGUNRR The collapse began as a vertical fall. As the tower sank below it's debris cloud the falling portion tilted and then rolled into another building. If it was a controlled demolition it was one hell of a sloppy job. Also we did not invade anyone in response to 9/11... We sent troops into pakistan to search for and eliminate terrorist cells WITH THE HELP OF THE PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT. The only invasion that occured was with iraq which was in response to EUROPEAN intel involving WMDs.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514 You dont understand. America used 9/11 as an excuse to invade. The Pakistani gov. believed us. They believed we needed thier help. And anyway if the Pakistani gov. said "no were not gona help you get out of our country" we would have just shot them anyway cause were america Were the worlds biggest assholes. We do what ever the fuck it is that we wana do.
InfiniteGUNRR 1 month ago
@InfiniteGUNRR We never invaded pakistan... An invasion is against a nation. Our actions were purely against the terrorists. So you are litterally saying that they created a hoax to go after a fake terrorist cell that they made up during the hoax? You don't see any problem with that logic? Are you insane?
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514 Your misunderstanding. We first went into the middle east to provoke confilct. Before 9/11 we had already gone over there. The U.S. didnt tell the public... why? so when 9/11 happened it looked like a random attack on the U.S. The U.S. used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq for Oil (The Bush family is one of the biggest families in the oil industry) And it was also an excuse to take away our rights. Example *Patriot Act*. One of the most unconstitutional bills ever.
InfiniteGUNRR 1 month ago
@InfiniteGUNRR Do the dates March 19–May 1, 2003 mean anything to you? It should... Those are the dates that we invaded iraq. Hmm nearly 2 years after 9/11... Oh but yea sure we definately whent there completely because of 9/11 huh. Maybe you are too young (or stupid) to remember but by 2003 most people were well enough over 9/11 not to want us to just leap into war.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514 And also they didnt want to destroy that much because of the $Cost$. They needed something really bad to happen but not that bad. Its just an excuse to go to war. War=Profit. Debt=Profit. There is a video of cops standing outside of the WTC before it was hit telling civilians to "STAND BACK ITS GONA BLOW"... Truth is stranger then fiction
InfiniteGUNRR 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514 Its was a straight down semetrical collapse.... WAKE THE FUCK UP!
InfiniteGUNRR 1 month ago
@InfiniteGUNRR Yeah the planes alone wouldn't have been enough to bring them down. This fake terror war needs to stop.
christiantruther86bv 1 month ago
@christiantruther86bv America faked the german attack on the lusitania to get into WWII. America faked attacks on Cuba to start a war with them. America went into Vietman not to defeat them but to have a stagnent war (longlasting). America faked terrorist attacks so they would have an excuse to invade the middle east for oil. You may ask why? Well its very very simple. WAR = PROFIT
InfiniteGUNRR 1 month ago
@InfiniteGUNRR - And most people don't know all this because of all the propaganda. Or they do but there to afraid to say anything. And allot of people just don't care unfortunately.
We can't take it anymore. The people of America need to stand up.
christiantruther86bv 1 month ago
This controlled demolition theory is just more government bullshit concocted to distract us from the real truth! Wake up!
Mokey117 4 months ago
@Mokey117 And the real truth is....?
lasoogneypubes 2 months ago
No no no ,Dnt tell people facts ,They will say your crazy media is god!
-.- =p (Great video love it)
xingwei12 4 months ago
are there any videos of highrises falling from other shit like fire or planes?
y0utUBeH8r 4 months ago
this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashingthis is brainwashing. this is brainwashing. this is brainwashing
lefty6584 4 months ago
@lefty6584 What makes you say that?
InfiniteGUNRR 3 months ago
@lefty6584 No what you here on tv is brainwashing, this is trying to unbrainwash you friend.
christiantruther86bv 1 month ago
This Muslim pipe dream of "controlled demolition" is not even conjecture; It's pure stupidity to suggest that American could or would have blown up its own buildings. Simply laughable.
SupportAZ 5 months ago
@SupportAZ You're naive. When billions of dollars are at stake, people only see green. Nationality, race, gender, religion comes second.
shawnpurcee73 4 months ago
@SupportAZ you have no idea, until it's to late soon. THEN you realize.
barthoedemaker 4 months ago
With the number of witnesses and footage, this can't be so. The sound generated by a controlled demolition would echo with enormous power that EVERYONE would hear.
Abstruse23 5 months ago
First off, the explosions generated by controlled demolition are unmistakable. If you're anywhere near it, you know what's happening. Then take 9/11. Only a handful of people claim to hear explosions. If this were the case, then there would have to be a non-stop stream of explosions to take down buildings of that size.
Abstruse23 5 months ago
@Abstruse23 People on the scenes of Legal controlled demolitions are always informed so they would be expecting the explosions, and they'd naturally listen for those explosions. When you're on site of a disaster zone such as 911, 99.9% of the people would be in panic/fears/despair/shock/sorrow/anxiety, you can't possibly be paying attention to anything. Except those on the very front lines of the disaster, the explosions would be too heart-pounding not to notice. Debunkers, try harder. ;)
KrazeDiamond 4 months ago
@KrazeDiamond
That may be true for witnesses. What about all documented footage? Microphones don't experience the "panic/fears/despair/shock/sorrow/anxiety" you speak of.
Abstruse23 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
+2
Controlled demolition = uncontrolled stupidity
BladeJones 5 months ago
Great video.
If one picture is worth a thousand words, then one video is worth a hundred thousand words.
I like the repetition. It relentlessly drives home the hard facts that so many sheeple are resisting with all their might and try desperately to rationalize away.
thechinadesk 5 months ago
Why do i feel like i'm being brainwashed?
BionicMonkeys 5 months ago
This is stupid. Look at the bottom of the buildings when they are destroyed by controlled demolition. They have an explosion at the base of the buildings, causing the entire building to fall on itself. Now look at 9/11. these buildings do not have an explosion at the bottom. The entire building does not fall on itself. The only movement in the building is from the very top, then it collapses down onto the rest of the tower. Not a controlled demolition. easy as that.
sch3ffs 5 months ago
@sch3ffs there are witnesses that say they heard explosions near the base of the tower and then there is the footage of the blasts occurring below the impact point and before the point at which the tower rapidly falls on itself in a cascading fashion. i mean i don't know if i really believe in this stuff but it's very interesting.
SuperMcha 5 months ago
Controlled demolition = uncontrolled stupidity
SupportAZ 5 months ago
NAME OF SONG AT 1:23 PLEASE
laylow7582 5 months ago
The tv controls everything that has to do with government on the tv in what we see when we see it and its easy to know this if you like ever news site on face book or twitter they all post the same stuff at same times about governmental stuff going on there for we are not seeing anything more then what are government wants us to see about them through the media and the media controls most of are population of what we think is going on meaning they are not showing us the serious stuff why?
skaterraiter 5 months ago
But there's a big difference between the demolitions and the WTC tower collapses. The buildings being demolished collapse into their footprint, whereas the tower collapses start from the top, where the plane hit.
controllerbrain 5 months ago
All the controlled demolition buildings collapse from the bottom, with the bottom floor being equally affected as the top one at the time the explosives go off. The WTC footage clearly shows it collapsing from the point of impact, with each floor hitting the next.
TMOvids 5 months ago
TMOvids,
So, please tell me what hit WTC 7 building again? There is no fixed rule that says those delay Cutter Charges have to synchronize from Bottom to Top either in order to bring down any buildings!! >=)
Proof that Thermite can cut a vertical column....
v=jpPNRrylH00
Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7....
v=hZEvA8BCoBw
Immortal Technique - Bush Knocked Down The Towers....
v=VYAjsALTTgU
BTW, why hide evidences of 9/11 afterward? What R U Spin Doctors afraid of!? =/
IronJackalTw 5 months ago
@IronJackalTw Nothing hit WTC7. And you're correct, the cutter charges could have been programmed to go off exactly as you'd expect from a collapsing skyscraper, but it seems like a big leap of logic. Something matches a fire collapse 100% and I conclude it's a complicated setup made to mimic a fire collapse?
TMOvids 5 months ago
TMOvids,
WTC 2 & WTC 1 have Pre-Rigged Explosives near Point of Impact along with many Synchronized Time-Delay Cutter Charges! That's WHY they goes down a bit different than WTC 7, but they still all fall on their own footprint into fine dust!! {roll my eyes}
Frank A. DeMartini....
v=sO1JxpVb2eU
Tomahawk Missile....
v=th9sduUBmfs
USA Government & Military have TECHNOLOGY & KNOW-HOW to carry off that 9/11 False Flag Operation easily even if Arab Hijackers can't pilot any Jumbo Jets!! =/
IronJackalTw 5 months ago
@IronJackalTw
Definitely a Zionist False Flag, but,
How were charges or their triggering mechanisms protected from the initial explosions and fireballs?
How did explosives turn the Twin Towers into dust in mid air without any visible flashes, or signs of debris being shot upwards?
Why were the debris piles ten stories smaller than what they were calculated they should have been? drjudywood com
lughcious 5 months ago
@lughcious Well if you watch the north tower collapse you see flashes while it collapse plus the sun wasnt on that side so it cant be reflections, when you see dust shooting out the north and south tower they say its the floors collapsing on each other, then how come out of one window? What about the one on the 30 floor that shot out when they begin to collapse? Why did wtc 7 collapse straight down?It wasnt hit by a plane ppl say it was hit by fallin debris so was wtc 3,4,5,6 they didnt collapse
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
First of all, I know that fire didn't cause the Unprecedented Spontaneous Demolitions of Three Skyscrapers on September 11
To pressurize water and push it up the towers, they use compressed air tanks. It is possibly these tanks responsible for the expulsions out the sides. Notice, none are accompanied by flame.
Where is the video which you allege shows charge flashes in the North Tower as it turns to dust in mid air?
What type of explosive do you theorize were used?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit This video /watch?v=913Am7ZScVM and this video /watch?v=xu_qct5gp-M
Ok we all know the twin towers collapsed due to fire they claim but what about wtc 7? It was on fire burned for 7 hours but these three buildings were the first in history to collapse due to fire, there were buildings i seen look like hell the whole building was on fire it wad also a skyscraper and temps was more hot then the twin towers but some how the temps in the twin towers went up to 2600 degrees how?
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
Those videos are a joke. That's why they're rated down. You're a time waster. Every video shows the Twin Towers turn to dust in mid air. They came apar at a molecular level, except for the aluminum exterior panels used for aesthetics, which fluttered down.
1. What energy holds atomic particles together, i.e; The electrons orbiting around the nucleus?
2. What type of explosives do you theorize were used?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit They rated down by ppl who dont believe the conspiracy, those buildings were designed to not fully collapse, those lines that go around the building are there to stop the collapse if happen they were made into three sections, like NIST say its impossible to get those temperatures in those buildings, when they got proof they didnt answer back, how can those temperatures get so high? Nobody knows that said no cutter charges were used, where is the core?
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
What type of explosives do you theorize turned the Twin Towers to dust in mid air?
What is the energy that holds atoms together?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit @onefodderunit thats a good question, idk lol They say the dust is from the floors slamming down on each other pulverizing the concrete, if these pancaked on each other that would leave the core behind still standing, im not great with science material, they say cutter charges were placed on the joints, they say how can thousands of joints snap at the blink of an eye? Idk how you can spot cutter charges, watch this video. /watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
For the third time: What type of explosives do you theorize were used?
Can you admit that you can't find a video of a structure turning to dust in mid air, Yes or No?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit Control demolitions take place throughout the building mostly the bottom floors thats why it collapse straight down, the reason for the twin towers turning to dust in mid air is because well first the impact site was in the air lol, ppl that were there said mulitple explosions were heard before the collapse, idk what explosives they used ppl say cutter charges but idk what cutters are capable of
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
Why do you keep posting "lol", Shill? You find the mass murder of Americans amusing?
Can you admit that you can't find one example of a structure turning to dust in mid air? Yes or No?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit why would i laugh at that? Im laughing at that question, once again there is no vid because the impact zone wasnt in the air, these were massive buildings, they had to make it to where this time the firefighters cant tame the fire like they did back in 1993 when it was in the basements
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
Now you're talking pure jibberish. There are tons of building demo videos. Can you admit that you can't find a single one in which the structure turns to dust in mid air, as both the Twin Towers did - Yes or No?
Your answer is No, because "cutter charges" weren't used.
The force which holds atoms together was disrupted by an external force. You're incapable of grasping this concept?
Directed Energy Weapons are already in use.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
Moving on. There's not one single verified gassing of anyone in WWII, let alone millions of European Jews. Do you deny this?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit why would a building turn to dust in a video besides 911? These are massive buildings with concrete on each floor, theres a hole in the building where it impact, no other video had buildings nvm you won idk i really dont im going off what other ppl say, can you explain why wtc 7 collapsed? And ww2 ? Aint ppl saying it was fake? It was started by our own ppl that bombed a ship and they blamed it on somebody?
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
Cutter charges don't turn structures to dust in mid air. Your hole theory is ridiculous. .
Do you deny there isn't a single verified gassing in WWII of anyone, out of supposed millions of European Jews, Yes or No.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit Cutter charges can weaken a huge building like that, then it collapse as the building collapses the cutters are going off below the falling debris so when the collapsing zone reaches that point it would keep going and wont stop, and WWII i wouldnt know back in high school i didnt pay attention, didnt they gas them to kill them ?
prettynessaful 5 months ago
@prettynessaful
Neither cutter charges nor thermite/mate turn buildings to dust in mid air, shill.
You are guaranteed you will not find one verified gassing of anyone in WWII. Zionist pity-myth dispelled.
If you're so damn ignorant about everything, why aren't you reading instead of parading it?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit Im not ignorant, i just have no knowledge on that stuff, the reason i saying stuff about 911 being inside job because when i believed it was terrorist everybody got on me made good points, i thought they knew what they werre talking about, why did those buildings collapse so fast
prettynessaful 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@prettynessaful posted: "idk i really dont", "idk what explosives", "Idk how", "idk lol"
And this bit of comedy: "Im not ignorant, i just have no knowledge on that stuff"
Demo charges or thermite/mate don't turn buildings into dust in mid air. Directed Energy Weapons, about which you are completely ignorant, are already in use, and openly.
lughcious 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@prettynessaful
Molten means liquid. You can't pick it up with a claw. If there was hot molten steel in the rubble, workers would not have been able to enter the basements or walk on the pile. The machines wouldn't have functioned. Other forces can disrupt the force that holds atoms together. The force which you admit you're clueless about.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
ANOTHER VIDEO-PROOF SHOWING CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
youtube.com/watch?v=aMAiBTUCOgQ
PLEASE DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO AND UPLOAD IT TO YOUR CHANNEL.
GO TO KEEPVID.COM TO DOWNLOAD. SPREAD THIS VIDEO.
ruflychux 5 months ago
Fucking brainwash "THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION"
1sniper1wolf1 5 months ago
Comment removed
IronJackalTw 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1sniper1wolf1,
He explained clearly on WHY that WTC 7, WTC 2, & WTC 1 R Controlled Demolitions, but U R too RETARDED like Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome BABY to get it!! >=)
George Carlin - The American Dream....
v=acLW1vFO-2Q
George Carlin - We Like War....
v=sDkhzHQO7jY
George Carlin comments on 9/11 Truth and the NWO....
v=pow5_UYKaJ8
Biggest BRAINWASHING R from Mainstream MASS MEDIA owned by Zionist CHRISTIAN Dick Cheney JEWS & controlled by Whitey CHRISTIAN Ted Haggard FAGGOTS!! >=P
IronJackalTw 5 months ago
Buildings that fell over weren't on fire.
Buildings that were demolished collapsed from one side to another, at ground level.
The WTC collapsed at the bottom edge of the fire, 2/3 up the building. And the building DID lean when it fell...
I have eyes.
macsdestroypcs 5 months ago
@BladeJones- read the comments right. Research properties of steel and jet fuel. I'm not arguing either side, just stating the facts. Oh, and since you said to "look up" the temperature at which steel loses 50% of it's strength here it is: NO WHERE FUCKING NEAR 600 DEGREES! And this isn't Muslim gibberish. I think 6 1/2 years of active duty gives me the right to "state the facts".
mikeonmike 5 months ago
I like how he edited out the audio lol
ElxxChupacabra07 5 months ago
Two Things: Who put explosives in the building and when? Secondly where are the ppl who were in the planes if it was a military plane?
neptunestarbaby 5 months ago
WHATS THE THEME CALLED ON 1:22???????????????
laylow7582 5 months ago
Jet Fuel in open air burns at around 500-600 ºF
The temperature needed to melt steel is about 2600-2800ºF and thermite is required. Jet fuel does not contain thermite.
Just facts.
mikeonmike 5 months ago
Melt? Why don't you look up at what temperature steel loses half it's strength? 500 - 600? LOL. Then research at what temperature jet burns. My OVEN in my kitchen gets that hot. You are a certified idiot.
BladeJones 5 months ago
Did any of you morons notice that 747's full of jet fuel hit the towers??? Also what is a 102 story building collapse SUPPOSED to look like when jet fuel weakens the steel by 50%? This is the 1st time this has ever happened? All of this conspiracy nonsense is Muslim gibberish.
BladeJones 5 months ago
@BladeJones According to the conspiracy cheerleaders, the twin towers were apparently designed to withstand a direct hit from a nuclear missle by the way they talk about it.
Oh, and you can also demolish two of the largest buildings on the planet without a single bit of sound from the explosives.
DanSVT03 5 months ago
@BladeJones the majority of the fuel carried by the 747 was evaporated on impact when it hit the tower
dshiznit148 5 months ago
@dshiznit148 Thermal imaging don't lie. It showed that temps were over 800 degrees. Hot enough to weaken that steel -- Or for all of you conspiracy Scientologists, hot enough to ignite blast caps and explosives! If George Bush and Elvis snuck in the night before then why didn't their demolition explosives level the buildings on impact????!!!!! It took a few HOURS for the explosives to finally ignite in 800 + degree heat! LOL
BladeJones 5 months ago
@dshiznit148 Fuel would ignite if you tried to vaporize it THAT fast.
macsdestroypcs 5 months ago
this is fucking bullshit grade a BULLSHIT!!!!!
fullontorpedo 5 months ago
9/11 was a ''Controlled Demolition''.My theory
MyU2ube01 5 months ago
this. is. a. controlled. demolition.
ArcticTrees 5 months ago 19
@ArcticTrees this is what a high rise looks like when its being demolished with explosives.
smeganrocks87 3 months ago
what I see in the controlled demolition, as compared to the twin towers collapse, is that the charges in a CD tend to start from the bottom, not the top. I am not a demolition expert, but it seems more logical that the puffs of smoke coming out of the sides of the building are from the air pressure from the subsequent floors collapsing on each other. But I have to admit that it still seems strange that the damaged parts don't simply keel over.
riesji 5 months ago
@riesji
Are u sayin that controlled demolition can ONLY ever start from the bottom or lowest floor? lol It can start in the middle, the side, the outside, the inside, the interrior, the upper level, even the roof top
it all depends on what u want to do. Hence why its called controlled demolition
There have been hundreds of 'puffs' of smoke documented across the twin towers durin 9/11 before and durin the towers collapse
swu880 5 months ago
@swu880
by documented i don't mean that NIST and govt officials recognize them. I mean that people there heard, reported, recorded and/or witnessed them
swu880 5 months ago
@swu880
So if i blow out a buildin startin from the top right corner, that is NOT controlled demolition? That just some fire? right... only a naive fool would say such a thing
swu880 5 months ago
@swu880 I'm not saying that, again, I'm not a demolition expert. I'm just reporting what I see on the video, and that are all demolitions starting from the ground, which contrasts with the twin towers collapse.
riesji 5 months ago
is evident
moviesilluminatis 5 months ago
I love how the moron who made this turned off the sound to all the actual controlled demolitions so you couldn't here all the loud ass explosions that are made when actual explosives go off. The towers collapsing started with no loud explosions like that. The reporter on scene for Good Morning America even said he heard a "rumbling" and then collapse from four blocks away....not a series of loud explosions which is actually necessary.
a021692 5 months ago
not many troll comments on this video, proves how powerful it is
yellow5n 5 months ago
ok guys? plane crash into middle of tower, so it collapses intothe middle of its self.
the wtc roof sank in on itself, starting from the middle....
and for a tower that size, you would need to sneek in a shit load of demo charges...
goodapplesdope 5 months ago
I really like the way you used fellow architect Richard Gage's observation that "This is a controlled demolition" to drive home the point, again and again and again.
Relentless repetition is a valuable rhetorical device. There are times when it is essential. This is one of them.
Too many people refuse to admit that WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 could only have been controlled demolitions.
thechinadesk 5 months ago
@TheNewestNobleMember and sorry for calling you an idiot by the way
technical1234567 5 months ago
@cds587 yes but even then it wouldn't collapse like that I think where the plane hit that part would fall to it's side and not collapse on itself
technical1234567 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheNewestNobleMember I think they did it for a reason to go to war
technical1234567 5 months ago
@TheNewestNobleMember your an iditot a plane crashing into it can't make it fall like that plus those planes wouldn't bring it down
technical1234567 5 months ago
@technical1234567 The people who built it said the biggest plane could hit it and it would not collapse; that was in the late 60's early 70's era of "the worlds biggest plane". They didn't think that someone would intentionally ram up the engines to more power than ever and fly straight into a the WTC on purpose. Planes that hit WTC had a wingspand almost as wide as building. Once hit, destroyed alot of concrete and steel in the process thus putting more weight on smaller areas in the buildings.
cds587 5 months ago
@technical1234567 im not saying it did but yes why would the government go hmm.. what would really fuck up the financial situation all over the globe OH i know lets blow up the world trade center GREAT IDEA no! why what was the governments motvie then?
TheNewestNobleMember 5 months ago
I wish he would say "This is a controlled demolition" again.
Themdrnage 5 months ago
this is idiotic if it was a controlled demolition how do you explain the two planes smashing into the sides of the building thats really controlled ye! o.o
TheNewestNobleMember 5 months ago
is this a controlled demolition?
dbcgalway 5 months ago
Bin Laden is a fictional character created by the US government.
P1X574 5 months ago
@P1X574 And you are an absolute idiot sir!
TheNewestNobleMember 5 months ago
@TheNewestNobleMember No, you're the idiot for being so naive and gullible. WAKE THE FUCK UP!
P1X574 5 months ago
The thing is the WTC exploded from the top not the bottom of the building. So, there is no way that it was going to tip over becasue the bottom of the building is unharmed which makes it stable. But, not for long.
FamilyGuyStuffs 5 months ago
They realized the planes didn't bring it down. So it had to come down, but for added effect, bombs were placed to bring both down. Idk who's idea it was , but someone WILL find all of you responsible.
dorifto91 6 months ago
you morons are ridiculous. you have no evidence. NOTHING. Nobody serious would ever look at your kooky nonsense
AroundSun 6 months ago
I really get annoyed about all of this 9/11 conspiracy bull shit. When you have a gaping hole all the way through a building with temperatures that reach over 1,000 degrees F, all that weight above the hole is pushing down on the melting steel beams, the building is going to go down. What your saying in video is that when the WTC collapsed, it went straight down like a controlled demolition, FALSE top part on south tower went side ways and when both buildings fell they damaged other buildings.
cds587 6 months ago
@cds587 those steel gerders are made to withstand thousands of degrees, not just 1000 not the singular thousand but thousands with an S.
Grunt922 6 months ago
@Grunt922 Yes but when there is 100,000 tons of weight above heated steel, that steel is going to bend.
cds587 6 months ago
@cds587
If it's going to bend the top would tip over.
skillsz0rs 5 months ago
@cds587 why building 7 fell then ? why reporters, firefighters and eyewitnesses said there were bombs going off ? this guy was running down the stairs to exit the building , and the wall blew up in his face killing people he survived , what caused that ?
fhab525 6 months ago
@fhab525 Those so called "explosions" going off was the steel and other things shifting under the massive weigh of the debris.
cds587 6 months ago
Comment removed
saunjuan2 6 months ago
@cds587 except the supports required temperatures of 2,500 degrees (Celsius i think) to melt... explain that
27thlegion 5 months ago
@27thlegion Did you ever hear of the term bending, because a heavy structure does not have to have the steel melted in order to fall. The massive weight of the to part of the building had extreme temperatures NOT to melt the steel but to bend it due to thousands and thousands of tons and heated steel.
cds587 5 months ago
This video proves the point it's trying to refute. Look at the Twin Towers.. they didn't come down in a controlled way. In a controlled demolition the building falls all at once. The Twin Towers collapsed where the planes hit, and then the rest pancaked. It didn't come down all at once.
8GarretttterraG8 6 months ago
Its still shocking to see those towers go down...
5lupe5fiasco5 6 months ago
If it was a controlled demolition why weren't all the people that worked in the buildings not told to about it? You'd think that something that big would be announced to the employees so that way no one would go to work that day and end up injured or dead; although so many lives were lost due to human ignorance.
AoyagiKiyoka 6 months ago
@AoyagiKiyoka ...idiot
cops12344 6 months ago
@cops12344 And you just proved my point, thank you very much. -__-
AoyagiKiyoka 6 months ago
@AoyagiKiyoka they were trying to have war with iran, so they can get more oil, so they did this to make the public have war with the middle east, but people would get angry and say why have war with them, and start protests. so they want the citizens to pour their money into the war. conclusion america is bad and greedy!!
awesomeiguy 6 months ago
@AoyagiKiyoka Nobody would tell the employees to not go to work at the WTC that day because then obviously everybody would know it was planned. If the government were to plan something this immense and tragic they would do it with perfect plans, ideas, and people. Don't you think it would be a LITTLE suspicious if EVERY employee was notified that these buildings were going to be demolished? just a little?
srthiers 6 months ago
31 people who disliked this dont believe in the LAWS OF PHYSICS.....
Little bitches....
Glenmead 6 months ago
Was this trying to brain wash me with repetitiveness!! XD
poop5045 7 months ago
No it was the terrorist did it!! NOT!!!! but actually yes our government is run by terrorist SO YEAH the terrorist did it!!!
b1ackhaz3 7 months ago 18