I think that if you'd turn off some stuff in Vista which you don't really use it would boot as fast as XP. Vista has a lot of background services which you don't need.. Anyway, this computers are amazing.. Need to buy one myself :)
I'm wondering how much crap they have installed on that XP machine. Two pages worth of garbage in Start menu, probably a dozen of useless services, and who knows what else. XP is the right OS on such device with no doubts.
I wonder how much money Microsoft paid him to promote vista on the OQO Model 02. We don't even know how much memory the OQO model running XP has VS. the one running Vista. You could easily be deceived, MS wants users to move on and use Vista.
this could be true, but then again i really perfer vista, not for its speed or anything because if you think about it out of your whole life its not gona kill ya if you wait 5 secs longer just that the inter face is more friendlier with the vista and better looking and easy to use... but hey thats my view, everyone is entitled to their own opinion :)
I agree with this guy, vista was only around 5 seconds behind XP. Are you guys really that impatient? I also prefer Vista for the interface, and new features. A lot of people hate it because they configure their OS wrong, while others hate it because they follow the other people who say they hate it. When you've got Vista working, its brilliant.
lol the reason ( many ) people hate vista is because of its compatabilities, loading times, and many many bug issues. now dont get me wrong 12 gb of ram on that thing will do some damage, but 4gb on xp will still show " less is more "
Which OS you choose is up to YOU as a user. theres no BAD OS its all opinion based. I LIKE XP over vista & I prefer LINUX over both ( now if i had windows proggies on vista i'd be set lol) MACs are amazing for work like audio and video work i stick by that,
Vista i never liked sorry if you like it awsome. I don't like it sorry.
Hey, we don't tell you that you're childish by pretending to be from Japan and 30 years old and neighter do we laugh about the fact that you're still living with mommy and daddy...sigh
"You are wrong, and ignorant. Vista outpaces XP on newer hardware. That's just the way it is. The reason you see the large memory footprint on Vista is because of Superfetch and how the memory manager was updated. Memory is automatically deferred from Superfetch to programs that need extra Ram. Assholes like you are poor, with shitty computers."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yea ur right,,, windows vista is better than XP,,, if u use the right hardware,,, you can get better games(DirectX 10 Games), even FPS are low.. i don't care,, (30-35FPS is enough for me)
my rig..
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
4GB DDR2 RAM
nVidia 8800 GTX
2x32GB SSD SATA HD
Operating System:Windows vista SP1
...here in Philippines,,, most hardwares are cheap.. especially in Gilmore
Who the hell has hundreds of cash to spend on a new 9800X2 these days? cuz i don't so vista is waaaaay out of the question for me as it is for millions of people around the world, no wonder the slow rate of adoption and low sales of it.
Vista is more of a home OS, while XP remains flexible for bussines, homes, schools, etc.
And i do a 360 btw. its just that i like to play on my PC too, but claiming that Vista is better OS for gaming is ridiculous.
Fuck that fuck Vista for fucking hell! XP ruleees! All best programmers uses XP! And Vista is just parody of MAC OS X!!! Who likes Vista go and buy Mac!
That might aculy be a good idea for some people because geuss ehat in another 2 years the new operating system is coming out, and in todays sosioty, you can't have a 2 generation old operating sytem
When it comes out, delete xp and it will be ok, and by then theywill have prefectef vista
The new operating system is called windows 7
don't belive me, type "windows seven" in the youtube search box
HAHA ! The only Problem is that you dont know how to configure XP, Vista is nerver faster than XP, forget it! With the right configuration XP is even faster and need less RAM than Vista. e.g. Ultimate runs 2GB of my 4GB Desktop RAM without any big Programms, XP with the same Programs runs only 600MB ! What is this ??? FUCKING VISTA ! Never USE it, Ever hate it. And Bill knows it too, or why you can now downgrade all new German Laptops back from Vista to XP?? Its the better System!
man all u need to do is configure xp and it will be very fast all u need to do is defrag and disk clean up your computer regularly and it will be amazingly faster (and also other programs like UniBlue)
You are wrong, and ignorant. Vista outpaces XP on newer hardware. That's just the way it is. The reason you see the large memory footprint on Vista is because of Superfetch and how the memory manager was updated. Memory is automatically deferred from Superfetch to programs that need extra Ram. Assholes like you are poor, with shitty computers. Rather than work in life to get nicer things, you would rather piss and moan like a pregnant bitch. Fuck you, worthless prick.
No, its not integrated. Why do we stll have to buy then. Vista uses "SuperFetch" which optimizes RAM and uses it more often than XP. Actually Vista is faster but people only like to compare the boot. Its actually the experience of working with windows which counts not the booting speed.
I agree with this video. Vista fire application from its rams (superfetch). XP fire applications from HDD and UMPC HDD is slow (4200rpm).
Just need to uninstall all the crabware, shut down unwanted services and use tuneup utilities and u are done. THe next time u uses vista it will be much faster than XP.
this was pretty lame, this doesn't prove anything, but there have been alot of complaints of how Vista is incompatible with so many programs out there that are compatible with xp. I don't even think that many people use outlook anyway, they probably use msn or yahoo.
Its actually compatible but you only have to adjust the programs a bit because of the UAC. I have been using vista on my lenovo Computer (Preloaded with XP Home and not Vista capable) bought on 26 November 2006 and it works great. (Experience Index is 3.6-Nvidia 6100)
My Macromedia Fireworks MX 2004 Software has to run in compatibility mode in Vista making Vista loose all the Aero features. Really sucky IMHO. Went back to XP Media Center Edition and everything is great :). I wonder what the specs of these PCs were. Like how they completely didn't tell us.
That's irrelevant to my point, although as the original comment I replied to is no longer on the front page I've forgotten what that point was... lol?
Vista is Great if you know how to configure it properly otherwise the stock copy is crap but remember they said the same thing about XP when it came out and now is extremely stable every os will have growing pains
M$ did not rip of OSX, or they did the worst job at the theft. Vista looks like a rotting corpse, it's horrid ugly unusable tripe. If they did steal from OSX it would be far better looking and maybe MORE productive then XP albeit it would still be buggy shyte.
WRONG KID, VISTA IS ALMOST INCOMPATIBLE WITH EVERYTHING, IT SUCKS IT RIPS OFF MAC OS X AND ITS A LOAD OF FUCKING BUG CRAP xD. SCREW VISTA, MAC OS X AND XP FOR THE GO
What Hugo shows off here is Vista + Office preloading benefits and not the real performance of Vista on a UMPC. What Windows Vista does and the reason it takes longer to start is that it pre-loads certain aspects of particular applications.
I'm going to be a critic here. You may have problems if you try to upgrade Vista from Win XP without an f-disk and fresh install but you can install a perfectly smooth running copy of Vista at home -- you don't need to reply on a factory install.
vsta cuz it r nwr nd hz mor feetUr3z
Haukthefurry 3 months ago
5k each
redsnow737 5 months ago
2 of them? 2 OF THEM? THATS LIKE 5k. WHY DO YOU EVEN NEED 2?
smallbro978 1 year ago
sweet video, vista pwns
xXINSANELOSERXx 1 year ago
those are some bushy eyebrows.
arring00 1 year ago
just put win 7 or if you want very fast yu just put win xp but vista is dead!!!
mynameisreggiexp 1 year ago
1.86GHz Intel® Atom™ Z540 on the oqo model 2+
timonix2 2 years ago
wow yor a nurd good for you
jwatsonjordan 2 years ago
hahahahaha:P
Negativiteitperk 1 year ago
went out of bisnuss
halo2psp 2 years ago
there is a thing called prefetching... some of these tests aren't very impartial.
oldarney 2 years ago
I think that if you'd turn off some stuff in Vista which you don't really use it would boot as fast as XP. Vista has a lot of background services which you don't need.. Anyway, this computers are amazing.. Need to buy one myself :)
Umarluch 2 years ago
How much does one of these cost? They look awsome. :D
iceyfire2894 2 years ago
i tested vista and xp on a 1.6 Ghz oqo and i found that vista was annoyingly slow and XP was running smooth as usual.
drawer77 2 years ago
Whatever happened to this guy? He used to have some entertaining vids.
unzarjones 2 years ago
I'm wondering how much crap they have installed on that XP machine. Two pages worth of garbage in Start menu, probably a dozen of useless services, and who knows what else. XP is the right OS on such device with no doubts.
vIadik 3 years ago
they definatly promoted vista... look at the one with vista, then look at the one with xp, why is vista's screen bright, but xp's isnt?
hackerpro1011 3 years ago
I'm running on OS X
TheJesselMan 3 years ago
i know there's quite a few problems with vista's thats why microsoft is working on this new windows 7 but i still prefer vista over xp
lovelydiva06 3 years ago
vista rocks
SpendinFORCE 3 years ago
vista the best my friend;)
axores20 3 years ago
Your talking rubbish... read up on what dllhell actually is.
ReDim69er 3 years ago
I wonder how much money Microsoft paid him to promote vista on the OQO Model 02. We don't even know how much memory the OQO model running XP has VS. the one running Vista. You could easily be deceived, MS wants users to move on and use Vista.
marchena2010 3 years ago
this could be true, but then again i really perfer vista, not for its speed or anything because if you think about it out of your whole life its not gona kill ya if you wait 5 secs longer just that the inter face is more friendlier with the vista and better looking and easy to use... but hey thats my view, everyone is entitled to their own opinion :)
Yungahnewerakid 3 years ago
I agree with this guy, vista was only around 5 seconds behind XP. Are you guys really that impatient? I also prefer Vista for the interface, and new features. A lot of people hate it because they configure their OS wrong, while others hate it because they follow the other people who say they hate it. When you've got Vista working, its brilliant.
TokageWeasel 2 years ago
I disagree, Vista is a hog if you're going to do any sort of gaming you want all the performance you can get out of a rig
I have XP/Vista dual boot on my system in certain games I average 2x the frames in XP that I do in Vista.
As far as memory usage the version of XP I have uses about 300MB on idle where vista can use up to 1.4 gig.
I don't know about you but I want my system to perform well not look nice
Its like having a Ferrari Enzo that can only do 10 Miles an hour ;)
NickWBG 2 years ago
lawl
Linux and OSX ftw!!!!!
futur3artist8D 2 years ago
Linux is good, OSX sucks more than Linux is good! lol
TheWater911 2 years ago
no real life rullz
terlika77777 2 years ago
lol the reason ( many ) people hate vista is because of its compatabilities, loading times, and many many bug issues. now dont get me wrong 12 gb of ram on that thing will do some damage, but 4gb on xp will still show " less is more "
boniturs 2 years ago
cool
eljess13 3 years ago
its amazing how far technology has come.
tbaldwin102 3 years ago 2
you can put linux on the Iphone !!
cyberjackcyberjack 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1. We already knew XP was faster than Vista
2. Is that an iPhone I spot in the background
P3xViewer 3 years ago
cool accent!
brandondonath 3 years ago 7
Which OS you choose is up to YOU as a user. theres no BAD OS its all opinion based. I LIKE XP over vista & I prefer LINUX over both ( now if i had windows proggies on vista i'd be set lol) MACs are amazing for work like audio and video work i stick by that,
Vista i never liked sorry if you like it awsome. I don't like it sorry.
atari26003 3 years ago 2
You guys are all missing the point... Look at that guys EYEBROWS!
rickiefiske 3 years ago
Hey, we don't tell you that you're childish by pretending to be from Japan and 30 years old and neighter do we laugh about the fact that you're still living with mommy and daddy...sigh
(shakes his head and walks away(
y6w6 3 years ago
lol - what?
rickiefiske 3 years ago
BWAHAHA I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING xD
+1
super6plx 3 years ago
Oh my god!
brandondonath 3 years ago
Vista was created when Microsoft techs put there heads together and thought "How can we combine all of the problems of XP and OSX?
deityofanimee 3 years ago
"You are wrong, and ignorant. Vista outpaces XP on newer hardware. That's just the way it is. The reason you see the large memory footprint on Vista is because of Superfetch and how the memory manager was updated. Memory is automatically deferred from Superfetch to programs that need extra Ram. Assholes like you are poor, with shitty computers."
correct
csybe2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yea ur right,,, windows vista is better than XP,,, if u use the right hardware,,, you can get better games(DirectX 10 Games), even FPS are low.. i don't care,, (30-35FPS is enough for me)
my rig..
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
4GB DDR2 RAM
nVidia 8800 GTX
2x32GB SSD SATA HD
Operating System:Windows vista SP1
...here in Philippines,,, most hardwares are cheap.. especially in Gilmore
kevinscottcaja29 3 years ago
what in the streets of rage 2 music is going on?
though i want one of these, probably would go for xp tbh, dont seem to like vista as much..
nice to see a direct comparison like this though
GaryT85 3 years ago
Who the hell has hundreds of cash to spend on a new 9800X2 these days? cuz i don't so vista is waaaaay out of the question for me as it is for millions of people around the world, no wonder the slow rate of adoption and low sales of it.
Vista is more of a home OS, while XP remains flexible for bussines, homes, schools, etc.
And i do a 360 btw. its just that i like to play on my PC too, but claiming that Vista is better OS for gaming is ridiculous.
Jhedan 3 years ago
Fuck that fuck Vista for fucking hell! XP ruleees! All best programmers uses XP! And Vista is just parody of MAC OS X!!! Who likes Vista go and buy Mac!
4evil2me 3 years ago
I love Vista it's great for games
Typowned 3 years ago
WHAAAAAT? great for games?? where the hell you heard that??
games RUN SLOWER on Vista, the only reason to run Vista is DX10 and right now is not worth it.
Jhedan 3 years ago 3
jajaja, vista sucks... i think this video is stupid...
Linux Rules
Metaldownloads 3 years ago
No MAC OS X Leopard Rulez
Power2Gov6 3 years ago 2
Vista not wins! Vista sucks and XP rules anyway!!!
4evil2me 3 years ago
xp only wins for games until directx 9
schieese 3 years ago
this isnt accurate because the age difforence of both and the programs that are on them the xp one would have had more time on it it would be slower
jousout 3 years ago
Vista is really bad. I had to downgrade 2 XP...
anerisgreat 4 years ago
That might aculy be a good idea for some people because geuss ehat in another 2 years the new operating system is coming out, and in todays sosioty, you can't have a 2 generation old operating sytem
When it comes out, delete xp and it will be ok, and by then theywill have prefectef vista
The new operating system is called windows 7
don't belive me, type "windows seven" in the youtube search box
rockindoodcm 3 years ago
Thanks!
Although probably by then I will have a mac...
anerisgreat 3 years ago
ok, the macs are cool, look up mac book air on youtube and the vids will tel lyou all about it
rockindoodcm 3 years ago
vista is still cooler
rockindoodcm 4 years ago
but alot slower
Cheatedd 4 years ago
very true
anerisgreat 4 years ago
I know, that is because is because it has more coll feachers, so yuo just need a littke more memery, like 1GB, or so
rockindoodcm 4 years ago
I WANT ONE
22AMOPRO 4 years ago 2
HAHA ! The only Problem is that you dont know how to configure XP, Vista is nerver faster than XP, forget it! With the right configuration XP is even faster and need less RAM than Vista. e.g. Ultimate runs 2GB of my 4GB Desktop RAM without any big Programms, XP with the same Programs runs only 600MB ! What is this ??? FUCKING VISTA ! Never USE it, Ever hate it. And Bill knows it too, or why you can now downgrade all new German Laptops back from Vista to XP?? Its the better System!
mrkus21 4 years ago
man all u need to do is configure xp and it will be very fast all u need to do is defrag and disk clean up your computer regularly and it will be amazingly faster (and also other programs like UniBlue)
armand237 4 years ago
You are wrong, and ignorant. Vista outpaces XP on newer hardware. That's just the way it is. The reason you see the large memory footprint on Vista is because of Superfetch and how the memory manager was updated. Memory is automatically deferred from Superfetch to programs that need extra Ram. Assholes like you are poor, with shitty computers. Rather than work in life to get nicer things, you would rather piss and moan like a pregnant bitch. Fuck you, worthless prick.
jonah1976 4 years ago
those palm pilot things are sweet
willysjeepparidon 4 years ago
lol funny how people still call handhelds palm pilots.
jamerican347 4 years ago
xp all the way... vista still dont have there shit together!
america151 4 years ago
Office is nearly intergrated in vista...
killervalonz 4 years ago
No, its not integrated. Why do we stll have to buy then. Vista uses "SuperFetch" which optimizes RAM and uses it more often than XP. Actually Vista is faster but people only like to compare the boot. Its actually the experience of working with windows which counts not the booting speed.
tatoo93 4 years ago 6
pfft please buddy all xp owns vista my xp turns off in 11 sec u got some unwated shit on their or something bud
Pleomax52 4 years ago
I agree with this video. Vista fire application from its rams (superfetch). XP fire applications from HDD and UMPC HDD is slow (4200rpm).
Just need to uninstall all the crabware, shut down unwanted services and use tuneup utilities and u are done. THe next time u uses vista it will be much faster than XP.
rexinusa 4 years ago 2
I AGREE WITH THAT BSoD PART AND EVERYTHING ELSE! I never got BSoD on my laptop until I installed Vista. Now, I have a history of 4 BSoDs!!!!
GO APPLE! AND LINUX!
psphacker8 4 years ago
lol, it's the other way for me.
No BSOD on Vista, excetp RAM related but I have an Asus C90S to it's normal
warior98 4 years ago
visa runs great on my computer!!!Vista RULEZ!!
haoffice 4 years ago
this was pretty lame, this doesn't prove anything, but there have been alot of complaints of how Vista is incompatible with so many programs out there that are compatible with xp. I don't even think that many people use outlook anyway, they probably use msn or yahoo.
calotin 4 years ago
Its actually compatible but you only have to adjust the programs a bit because of the UAC. I have been using vista on my lenovo Computer (Preloaded with XP Home and not Vista capable) bought on 26 November 2006 and it works great. (Experience Index is 3.6-Nvidia 6100)
tatoo93 4 years ago
My Macromedia Fireworks MX 2004 Software has to run in compatibility mode in Vista making Vista loose all the Aero features. Really sucky IMHO. Went back to XP Media Center Edition and everything is great :). I wonder what the specs of these PCs were. Like how they completely didn't tell us.
jamerican347 4 years ago
+ if i hear 1 more cry about windows steeling from osx then im going angry German Kid (search it) on a Osx comp.
windows improved its look and kinda looks like osx, which looks like a better version of Linux... which is a clone of windows :D
en3my666 4 years ago
Actually long ago in the before time Jobs created the system of using windows and Gates stole it.
deityofanimee 3 years ago
But they are both financially stable for the next 400 lifetimes, so it doesn't matter lol
atari26003 3 years ago
That's irrelevant to my point, although as the original comment I replied to is no longer on the front page I've forgotten what that point was... lol?
deityofanimee 3 years ago
Vista is Great if you know how to configure it properly otherwise the stock copy is crap but remember they said the same thing about XP when it came out and now is extremely stable every os will have growing pains
en3my666 4 years ago 3
windows xp stinks ,the best is windows vista
doublegota 4 years ago
i cant beleive mirosoft made this shit. i mean did they really think they culd get away from copying OSX
2OthCenturyFox 4 years ago
M$ did not rip of OSX, or they did the worst job at the theft. Vista looks like a rotting corpse, it's horrid ugly unusable tripe. If they did steal from OSX it would be far better looking and maybe MORE productive then XP albeit it would still be buggy shyte.
retepvosnul 4 years ago
true
Armake21Fan 4 years ago
who cares xp or vista as long you wont wait over a minute to download right?
nwiii 4 years ago
WRONG KID, VISTA IS ALMOST INCOMPATIBLE WITH EVERYTHING, IT SUCKS IT RIPS OFF MAC OS X AND ITS A LOAD OF FUCKING BUG CRAP xD. SCREW VISTA, MAC OS X AND XP FOR THE GO
Armake21Fan 4 years ago 2
thats exactly what I'm thinking if only vista got to sp1 already
armand237 4 years ago 3
lol@launching the internet explorer part, vista won that
velvetac1d 4 years ago
Xp rocks
greenhornet123 4 years ago 4
i want you to show us task manager beforehand, i think the xp one is filled with background tasks..
peckfeckler 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lmao douchebag
cody1217 4 years ago
Have you tried running PC mark or other benchmarks on the 2 units?
John Gatt VIAArena
viaarena123 4 years ago 3
This pre-loading feature takes up system resources and makes those resources unavailable to applications that are running in the foreground.
All the preloading and sexy interface in Vista is why I would not use it on the OQO yet as they use up too much systems resources.
viaarena123 4 years ago 3
What Hugo shows off here is Vista + Office preloading benefits and not the real performance of Vista on a UMPC. What Windows Vista does and the reason it takes longer to start is that it pre-loads certain aspects of particular applications.
viaarena123 4 years ago
I'm going to be a critic here. You may have problems if you try to upgrade Vista from Win XP without an f-disk and fresh install but you can install a perfectly smooth running copy of Vista at home -- you don't need to reply on a factory install.
viaarena123 4 years ago
WOW this is what iv been wating for some one to actualy show which of the OQO s are faster
BcsDaBomb 4 years ago