Runner interference my ass. He was in the fucking basepath, and when the locomotive comes, you get out of the way. If you don't want to be taken out, get out of the basepath.
@urgedduke Not in college. They have to avoid contact and slide. They can't even slide in a manner that may distrupt the play....this is even emphasized during force plays.
@urgedduke in college you need to slide into the base, if the second basemen is in the baseline you can take him out no problem. If he is just a step out of the line you cant make contact with him by saying you were able to reach the base with your hand, your feet must go into the bag. If this rule is not followed, the double play is assumed and 2 outs will be given.
The ruling is that the runner who was out on a force at home did not legally slide and therefore the umpire called the batter-runner out at first also because of the interference. The runner from third was not ejected. The rule is called the force play slide rule and states that unless sliding directly into the bag or plate on a force play, meaning an area the width of the bag, the runner is out and if the fielder is making a throw to another base for a second force that runner is also out.
IM A HIGHSCHOOL CATCHER AND I THINK ALL THESE RULES ARE GAY IF YOU f ING TAKLE HIM AT HOME YES THATS AN OUT BUT I MEAN IT SHOULD BE THE SAME AT HOME LIKE SECOND WHEN BREAKING A DOUBLEPLAY IF YOU CAN TAKE HIM OUT AND STILL BE ABLE TO REACH THE BAG OR PLATE ITSHOULD BE FINEJUST DONT GO AND TAKE HIM OUT SO HE ENDS UP FLYING TEN FEET MAKE IT CLEAN BUT THATS THE GAME!
this was a great play of the week for the spirit of the game that was representated by the catcher pretending a double play, while the man running to home prenteds to score, the slice is effective but the catcher is awesome even whitout knowing
@TheFootballa99 I think this guy was probably doing it because it was legal, but let's have a breakdown of what the ruling on running over a catcher is. The ruling on running outside of the baseline is that if you stray outside of the baseline so as to avoid a tag, you're out. If the catcher has the ball, and he's standing in the sideline you're out if you don't try to go through him. That leaves the option of sliding feet first which is the slide that is the easiest to get a tag on...
@TheFootballa99 ...headfirst which leaves you likely to get injured (ask Josh Hamilton if you don't believe me) or running over the guy with gear on to prevent him from getting injured in the manner that the baserunner might. Now, you claim to be a "footballa", but it sounds more like you're just a nigger (and no I'm not calling you that because I think you're black, you just sound like an ignorant piece of shit) and running backs try to run over people that may just be standing there...
@TheFootballa99 ...because it's within the confines of the rules. Taking out the catcher is within the confines of the rules of baseball. Oh btw, my original comment was supposed to be started out as him believing it was legal. In conclusion, to do anything besides taking the catcher out will most likely result in the baserunner being out, so this makes me think that if you're really trying to win a game, the "fucking pussy" would be the one that would NOT try to run over the catcher.
@LewisTheDogue I think you're a dick! He did something that he probably thought was legal, and he was called out for it. People make mistakes all the time, it doesn't mean you're a dick. (btw, I was kidding about saying you're a dick, I was just making a point that people who make mistakes aren't necessarily dicks ergo you.)
@scott9002ca It isn't like he tried to hurt the guy. He did a take-out slide just like you can do at second base probably because he thought it was legal. It was runner interference. Plain and simple... He shouldn't have been thrown out of the game, he should have been called out which he was. If the other team felt it warranted something more severe then they probably threw at him.
@Hollywoodsty0113 ? How does he look like a bitch the guy slides into him you would fall to dumb ass and i'm a catcher and have been for 3 years almost anytime you get slid into your going to fall.
Geez that's totally interference! Mainly because if you pause at 4 seconds you can tell the catcher already caught the ball and the runners out BEFORE he even starts to slide. That automatically makes his slide into the catcher intentional and an interference.
@travargev10 It's actually completely legal. Even though he clearly could have slid without hitting the catcher, he is still on the baseline. Watch any other game: runners advancing to second always charge towards 2nd base/SS to try to throw off the double play to first. It's the same exact thing, just a different plate.
umm.. this was a good call.. who ever said this isn't interference is an idiot.. if he slid into his foot or hit the back of his heal it wouldn't be interference... he slid on the front side of his leg with the intention of trying to trip him which he did.. and this isn't a rule specific to college its in most levels of baseball.. its better if u stop the clip at 15 sec not 5 and ull see how much clearer the interference is
i hate it when people do this there obviously out so dont try and ruin somebodies life. i was standing 4 feet off the plate and a kid slid AFTER home and slid right into my legs wich injured my knee. he shouldve been thrown out.
this is why baseball is for solid pussys,,,u mke any sort of body contact u fags start crying about it and an out is called...how f****** gay he should be save
@doug77082 and @danesters guy spent almost 300 comments arguing back in forth...what is there to argue about here because clearly the runner slid out of the path to take out catcher...and u spent 300 comments to figure it out? good job
doung77082 and danesters, u guys need lives, put it this way, evrybody is good at a sport, kobe is basketball, posey is baseball, i garuntee that neither one of them could play the other sport that good,(and to hit a baseball, it isnt that hard)
@nitroslayer2 and u dont play baseball faggot u probably dont know that u dont just swing and u hit it so actually its not that easy if it was everybody would be batting .1000
@07trizzle i dont paly baseball?little faggot u dont know shit, i do play baseball, and all you got to do is read the ball out of his hand, load, and swing and keeping your eyes on the ball. and u dont need to bitch about it, i just made a statement. and you probably have know idea what your talking about. i played my whole life, and i still am
@nitroslayer2 Hitting a baseball is the absolute hardest thing to do in any sport. There is a reason the best hitters in the world can only have success ~30% of the time.
@TheAmazingAnarchist1 that's true but it doesn't mean they don't get some great runs with 100% hits now and then :D I love this sport lol, just a shame it's not as convenient (with required space and number of players). I think @nitroslayer2 was mostly reacting to an offensive post by @07trizzle and doesn't mean to say it's not true but does say it's a lot about instinct and athletic ability.
I'll admit it was a good effort but that was just blatantly away from the plate the catcher's legs were completely away from the plate. If baseball has the same rules to second base they should apply to home plate. In that situation with the catcher facing away from the runner and a blatant slide, I deem that a dirty play.
It does often happen. The big deal on here is that there are those who don't think it should be an automatic out for player interference just because a runner goes after the catcher to break up a play.
@tylercrane it's not football or rugby or hockey, if you're saying that it's a lame rule, then you can practically tackle a guy and give him a concussion, and ruin his career.
What a dumb dumb rule. It should only be runner interferance if he runs out of the baseline but it's just like football.....in college the rules gotta be diffrence. I remember my 1st college game where we went into overtime. I was like Wait a minute, this is diffrent.
@screwdabrewcrew its not a dumb rule, cause you're practically saying that we should be able to tackle someone from behind, whenever we want. Baseball isn't about physical contact between two players.
@exmecan1 It's dumb because it's different. They should follow the rules just like major league baseball. For example they should use wooden bats but you're saying, "No the real rules aren't good enough so let's just make up our own rules as we go along." That's pathetic
All those comments probably have taken at least a day to type, maybe more. If you multiply that by all the other videos they probably have commented on, thats at least a week wasted of their "life".
whata a tool trying to take out a catcher. if that was pro he would have gotten fined. whoever purposely tries to take out a catcher after being out is a douche.
@CMC13C I was a college catcher first off. Many careers have been ended because someone barrels into a catcher who doesn't even have the baseball yet. So yes I am prejudice and in favor of sliding into the bag and not the catchers legs when playing at the college level.
@Crevan1986 Paused at 5 seconds and the runner's left foot is darn near 3 feet in front of the plate. You can not be 3 feet in front of the plate if sliding directly into the plate.
@ILOVEUMPS Pause it at 5 seconds, see that white line that the Runner's running down? That's called a base line. Imagine it keeps going all the way and doesn't disappear in the dirt. See how it goes right across the plate? His leg was in the baseline, his fault for getting hit.
I never thought i would read as much pointless shit, but its kinda intresting to see how much of an ass people can make out of them selfs Welcome to America =) thumbs up if u like to ski
Pretty gay rule. Can't take out people. Why take out a fun part of the game? Who cares about possible injury; it's all part of the game.
And yeah, doug77082, you are a moron. d/dx(sin(x))=cos(x) moron, it's not "undefined". Now go blow your math tutor and shut the fuck up. You seriously need a boyfriend.
@ectoplasem13 Haha, I think it is rather ironic that you are bringing into question others intelligence, and the word you used to do it you spelled incorrectly.
You raise a valid point about arguing on youtube, how ever you are still a moron. In just one sentence you managed to misspell whether, you're, and retarded.
@NairbSenoj why do people give a fuck how i spell shit on the interenet? you can still understand it right and honestly i dont even notice. you spelled however even though i'm sure you re-read that sentence like 10 times to make sure it had no errors in it.
note to ppl writing fucking paragraphs, i dont think the rest of the world other than u two care about what you to say so y dont u stop makin paragraphs, from wat i c is this is a stupid fight, just chill out and live in peace
@VoiceVampire Note to the loser who typed this useless piece of shit...nobody cares so stop fucking whining loser. We all know you need attention. There is no fight and others have added their comments. If you have nothing to say pertaining to the conversation, shut your cockholster, wipe your chin and move on.
Now that that is out of the way...No hockey is not the hardest sport. Yes, the hand to eye coordination needs to be fast and sometimes with a less reaction time, but the goalie himself takes up a majority of the space within the goalie already LIMITING the chances of a player making it in.Even if the goalie stood in a specific position and didn't move,the players chance is already very limited that it would go in.Lastly, the puck to glove size is a MASSIVE difference compared to baseball and bat
@danesters By YOUR comparison, hockey is tougher. 1. The puck has a much smaller surface area than a baseball. 2. The puck goes FASTER than a baseball. 3. To hit a moving puck on s slapshot and place the puck into a very small area to get it past the goalie into a goal not only with COMMON SENSE is tougher than simply "hitting a baseball", the percentage that it occurs is MUCH LESS than a baseball getting hit. In fact, HOME RUNS happen a higher rate than slap shot goals. So you're wrong.
@danesters Um, no retard, that is NOT out of the way. The two of us just schooled you by ACTUAL scientific proof that goals are scored on a MUCH LESS percentage than baseballs are hit for starters. But now you opened up your little cockholster, so I'll put you ont he spot and emarrass you and UCLA at the same time. WRITE ME A MATHEMATICAL PROOF that PROVES your point. I can tel lyou now that you can't because you haven't set any parameters to prove. Are you THAT FUCKING STUPID?
@doug77082 Now genius, prove to me that if a statement says ALL and I came up with an instance that disproved ALL...HOW IN THE FUCK CAN THAT STATMENT BE TRUE? Are you seriously that fucking retarded? This is SIMPLE LOGIC that you should have learned in HIGH SCHOOL. I can't believe you're still even arguing this. I never said you can't compare shit...but you can't compare wihtout KNOWN PARAMETERS. You simply CAN NOT.
@doug77082 You can NOT say IF A=B and B=C, then A=F. There is NO LOGICAL COMPARISON OF "F" to "A, B or fucking C". RETARD. Do you fucking not get this? For someone who is SUPPOSEDLY a college student, you have been presented with actual mathematical and scientific proof. Now prove to me that you can compare A, B, or C to fucking F in that statement. You can NOT because like your stupid ass statement, you do NOT KNOW THE PARAMETERS, thus NO COMPARISON CAN BE MADE IDIOT. YOU ARE STUPID.
@doug77082 The sad thing is, you still are trying to set your own parameters AS YOU GO ALONG to make your argument and even THEN you are failing. 90%? ROFLMA...Please do tell me where that scientific number comes from. That's the odds that you'll be left jerkin' off at the age of 40 efore getting some pussy unless your sister finally puts out. What is worse is when you are scientically proven WRONG...you aren't man enough to admit it...go UCLA. I'm sure they love you there. FUCKSTICK IDIOT
@danesters When you say "hitting a baseball is scientifcally proven than any other action in sport" THAT is the original argument...AN ACTION IN A SPORT IS AN ATTEMPT AT A 100 YARD FG. THEREFORE...pay attention moron...this ONE STATEMENT has DISPROVEN the original argument. If you knew ANYTHING about logic (and it is obvious that you do not), than any one statement that disproves the original argument means the argument is FALSE. THAT I can prove to you. I'll write MY proof right now.
@danesters Pay attention loser.All UCLA students are GAY. Mark attends UCA and he's a heterosexual (unlike yourself). THEREFORE, that ONE INSTANCE disproves that argument that ALL STUDENTS AT UCLA ARE GAY (though I'm sure the majority are). THE VAGUE STATEMENT THAT HITTING A BASEBALL IS TOUGHER THAN ANY OTHER EVEN IN SPORTS since I have presented at least ONE that negates that vague staement makes the statement FALSE. Hence there are some comparisons that are as stupid as you. SCHOOLED.
@danesters Your dumb ass reminds me of the army fags that used to tell us Marines how much tougher the army was than the Marine Corps and how much "more skilled" they were right before a range competition where the top 10 shooters were ALL Marines including myself and even Air Force and Navy Personnel were in the top 20 with NO army guys. Go figure. You remind me of those same losers who can't bare to say yiou were wrong even after absolute proof. Let's see YOUR proof now genius.
@danesters And now that we got THAT out of the way, your option right now is to offer MATHEMATICAL PROOF that there is NO SITUATION IN ANY OTHER SPORT THAT IS TOUGHER THAN HITTING A BASEBALL...Challenge the one I gave that negates it in fact....a 100 yard FG...that's tougher...it defeats that dumbshit statement as an argument. Prove it wrong and you can save face for UCLA...but you can't because 0% is much less than a fucking quadrapelgic can accomplish swinging the bat. So you're wrong.
@doug77082 Your own fucking brain calculates your percentage but you can't even fucking realize it!!! Why do you think people think it's harder to hit 90 MPH then it is to hit a 60 MPH..Because its all statistics, and they realize their chances are lower..With every play there is a percent...Again, if I can get a percent in a baseball play and a percent in a football play we can compare which is more difficult....Give me a play in football and a play in baseball and I will show you....
@danesters Once again, even in the realm of baseball you make a stupid argument. Not EVERYONE would say it is tougher to hit a 90 MPH fastball than a ball thrown at 60mph...especially if that 60 mph pitch is a KNUCKLE BALL. Why do you continue to make dumbshit arguments that are based on an assumption of paramaters? This is goes back to the ORIGINAL ARGUMENT which you were proven wrong and showed everyone you are simply not man enough to own up to it. You have, however, avoided it.
@danesters Again, no, if you get a percentage of one action in baseball, and another in football, you can compare the NUMBERS, but the numbers are meaningless. Again, your original argument SET NO FUCKING PARAMETERS...and you're still an idiot because you circumnavigated even attempting to show the mathetmatical proof whereas I clearly supported several arguments against the original statement. Now we're comparing a more realistic 70 yard FGA that HAS occurred and none made...0% is less again.
@danesters And yet again, you are still an idiot and you still are wrong. I didn't ask for a book that takes the point to Africa and back. I asked for your to prove to me that there are NO ACTIONS IN ANY OTHER SPORT THAT CARRY A LESS PERCENTAGE THAN THE PERCENTAGE OF A BASEBALL BEING HIT IN A MANNER IN WHICH IS LANDS IN FAIR TERRITORY. That is the original argument. Prove it. I've disproven it. 60 yard FGA's occur at a much lesser rate. In hockey, goals per shots on goal is much less.
@danesters I have given you SEVERAL occasions that disprove the original argument and instead of showing proof, you focus on the 100 yard FGA and ignore the rest? THAT is how you debate? You're also too stupid to realize that getting a percentage of two unrelated events and comparing that number is NOT the same as comparing those two events. I'll leave you with a few simple math problems and I want answers, not another book running away from the argument. One is EASY...now is yoru time..
@doug77082 Holy shit YOU'RE a nut ball...First off being in shape has nothing to do with the SKILL LEVEL in a sport. I've said that a billion times....YEAH, track is very difficult sport, it sure takes a lot of talent to RUN!! No one can run, that is soo very difficult.
Secondly, I will not be answering ANY of your questions until you have answered my questions you have avoided from the beginning...Then I'll answer your lame ass math formulation....
@danesters Dumbshit, it is obvious that you chose yet to go off on other tangents yet again and you evaded the very simple questions that were asked for you. You are no longer worthy of this debate. I never said that being in shape had anything to do with skill, so for you to state it and speak for me only demonstrates your obvious desparation to be right about SOMETHING, but you only showed further how lost you truly are. That was NEVER a point that was being debated.
@danesters YOU are the one who chose to move away from the original argument and talk about how football players were fat, remember? So YOU mention it and then bring it up later to call yourself wrong and somehow distort that to be me? Why? Is this something that works for you with your little sister when you debate with her over girlscout cookies? You made the comment that a center fielder was faster than anyone in every other sport. So you were proven wrong yet again & change topics.
@danesters If you want to mock speed not being a factor in "difficulty" then why did you state that a center field was faster than any other positional player in any other sport? Of COURSE you won't be answering any of my questions..you CAN'T! You are not intelligent enough to answer those questions, but you want to tell me you are a college student and you know mathematics? You are supposedly college educated in math on a high level, but you don't know basic math. Figures.
@danesters And do NOT play that little game where you simply SAY that I avoided anything from the beginning. I have been restating the ORIGINAL STATEMENT MADE IN THE BEGINNING and I proved it wrong. You said clearly "THERE IS SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT HITTING A BASEBALL IS THE MOST DIFFICULT ACTION OF ANY ACTION IN ANY SPORT". I proved it wrong and you said you were this great mathematician and I proved you were a liar. You know NOTHING about math or probability or sports in general. Avoid it.
@doug77082 My question to you is, "Is there a percentage I can get of a batters chance of hitting the ball in fair play? "
"Is there a percentage I can get of a kicker kicking in a field goal from a certain distance?"
If I can do that I can compare! How many times soes it take for your small brain to understand what the "NORM" means..You are the one proving to be as stupid as a wall of bricks. Is a 70 yard field fucking norm?!?! NO, no one ever attempts that either...
@danesters Yes, there IS a percentage you can get of hitting the ball into fair play and I NEVER denied that. I told you that comparing THAT PERCENTAGE to other percentages of other actions means absolutly nothing and it means just that. YOU then said if that percentate is lower than another action, that means it is MORE DIFFICULT and I proved to you there are MANY OTHER ACTIONS in MANY OTHER SPORTS that have a lower percentage, so you're wrong. What about this do you not get?
@danesters For you to continue to say that a mathematical percentage can be computated, but not understand that comparing that percentage to a percentage of another event is meaningingless only shows your lack of intelligence. For you to apply the made up "NORM' NOW AFTER THE FACT is something you also do not seem to get and the NORM is only how YOU want to manipulate the statistics. Define the NORM...something you STILL have yet to do except to NOW attempt to set the parameter AFTER the fact.
@danesters And NOW I can simply prove you completey wrong. You said "no one EVER attempts a 70 yard FG and since it HAS been attempted, than the phrase NO ONE EVER makes your statement wrong. Yes, someone HAS and nobody has MADE IT. So yes, that proves your argument wrong. 60 yard FGAs are even more common and I will tell you much less of THOSE are made than contact made with a baseball...but you can again manipulate stats and state "20 yard FGs". You are NOT getting that point.
@danesters Just because after your pathetically ridiculous argument that you can set parameters of data to make your argument true, that does NOT make the argument true at all. So no, hitting a baseball into fair play is NOT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN AS THE MOST DIFFICULT ACTION TO OCCUR IN ANY SPORT. You evading the topic and setting parametes to meet the argument AFTER the fact shows how weak and pathetic you truly are. Your lack of intelligence is much too obvious. Your desperation shows.
@danesters Here you go genius... 1. What is the derivative of SIN X? 2. What is the derivative of COS X? One and two are EASY. 3. What is greater? A. 50% of X or B. 50% of Y? Number 3 is the one that will prove you wrong. It is simple though..which is bigger? 4. If A > B and B>C then what is A in respect to D?
Now answer the questions direclty or once again, shut the fuck up and stop evading shit you know proves you are wrong. You evaded the questions last time..this will be the 2nd.
@doug77082 I said taking percentages of NORMAL plays...Plays that occur a MAJORITY of the time....Really??!?!?! 70 yard field goals are a MAJORITY of the time?!?!? Wow, you are dumb and shit. Thanks for showing everyone how smart you really are...Just the fact that I've had to tell you at least 5 times that we are talking about the average play and you still don't fucking understand that means you are STUPID AS SHIT!!
@danesters NO, you DIDN"T say anything about percentages of normal plays until AFTER l posted my statement that negated your ridiculous comment. It was NOT originally stated. You said that AFTER the fact to try to set a parameter that would make the argument true. That lack of any set parameters in the beginning was the point of this debate that you seem to ignore out of convenience. Even so, you can not DEFINE what is "normal" and so you can't possibly use that to make an argument.
@danesters The fact that you aren't man enough to show you know when you are wrong only tells me you are some little punk kid who feels the need to always be right no matter how much you are wrong because somehow your daddy made you feel bad about being such a dumbshit little punk. I'll let you have the "norm" right now...DEFINE THE NORM. You can't and even doing so is nothign more than you NOW setting parameters to manipulate data to make yourself feel like the statement is accurate.
@danesters Once again, I went back and reinstated the original argument and I addressed your pathetic reach to attempt to define the "norm" to set a parameter NOW that helps you and in all senses, you are wrong. NOW lets see if at least your honesty prevails here since I have addressed your comments directly...let's see you answer those questions I have you so maybe you can at LEAST demonstrate that expertise in mathematics that you claim to have that allows you to think you're smart.
@danesters To add to my questions, you need to define to me what you think the average play is in football...or hockey...or basketball....ohhhh. How about GOLF? I'd say that a HOLE IN ONE is much more difficult to make than hitting a baseball into fair territory and it certainly occurs at a rate MUCH LESS than baseball. You can even set the parameter by percentage because hitting a tee shot is the NORM in golf. How many times do you need to be proven wrong?
@danesters I even allow you to set these parameters AFTER the fact and still prove your dumb ass wrong with your own cheating of the semantics and logic of this debate. That's pretty fucking sad. Now be a man of your word and stop being a little avoiding punk and answer those questions and show us all you are fucking CLUELESS to mathematics and probablity. You made a stupid comment and figured if you said "scientific proof" that it made you right. You're wrong and you're a dishonest punk.
@doug77082 Going off of my first statement, which was, "The toughest thing to do in all sports is to hit a round baseball going 95 MPH with a round bat (And get it in fair play)"...That was my original statement, somehow it keeps changing a little bit more everytime you tell me what my "ORIGINAL" statement was..If you take this out of CONTEXT, yes, it could prove my argument false...Because we all know that kicking a 100 yard field goal is more difficult because it can't be done....
@danesters That's right...and that statement sets ZERO PARAMETERS FOR COMPARISON TO ANY OTHER EVENT...it also said "IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN" which was the exact point I made...it is NOT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN. It is merely YOUR DUMBSHIT OPINION. Is this really that complicated for you junior? So yes, thanks for restating...and proving me right yet again...TOUGHEST AS OPPOSED TO WHAT? ANYTHING? When yu say TOUGHEST, that means tougher than ANYTHING ELSE. HOLY SHIT.
Runner interference my ass. He was in the fucking basepath, and when the locomotive comes, you get out of the way. If you don't want to be taken out, get out of the basepath.
Coastergeekperson04 1 month ago
@Coastergeekperson04 What!? He clearly slid "sideways" as an intention to take out the catcher. A blind guy could tell that was interference...
kingollie07 2 weeks ago
leg sweep - 10 points
themooseisontheloose 2 months ago
i would have beat the shit out of that kid. his knees could have gotten destroyed
NYYstateofmind 3 months ago
That's why step towards 2nd base with your back leg..
MRiFINNEGAN 3 months ago
I hate the sound of aluminum.
RamiMtl 3 months ago
His helmet magically shot off sideways
WhAtZCrAcKiNN 3 months ago
when i was ten a kid 3 times my size plowed me at homeplate and i held on to the ball
CPTL3GO 4 months ago
if the video doesn't load just refresh the page and it should not buffer as much.
mmarano869 4 months ago
now i have 2 search what ectoplasem13 commented
sarathsgoku 4 months ago
dumbass runner he was out and not even blockin the plate the runner intended to fuck up his throw good call ump
giveitall1992 4 months ago
go sd
ghettoskater25 4 months ago
I just find it funny how one player managed to get called out twice.
tacospartan 5 months ago
Yeah, a take out. But that's baseball. A lot of baseball is trying to get away things: stealing signs, stealing bases, throwing a people, etc.
tedwilli9 5 months ago
tha catcher's leg is not in the way of the runner to the base, and thats the reason for the umpire to declare out in the plate
psyferrer 5 months ago
I seriously think all of you are 10 years old. Grow up and get a life.
macsdestroypcs 5 months ago
Thats the stupidest fucking rule i have ever heard of.
Jakestir08 5 months ago
idealists and grammar nazis congregating on sports clips. Just another day in the office.
mofukr 5 months ago
PORN: watch?v=j6vLVHUjqVI
infamousplayah 5 months ago
dont ya just hate it when the top comment is a reply?
chasmrad24 6 months ago 31
this rule makes no sense because you're allowed to take out the fielder at second base on a double play
urgedduke 6 months ago
@urgedduke Not in college. They have to avoid contact and slide. They can't even slide in a manner that may distrupt the play....this is even emphasized during force plays.
MAOfights 6 months ago
@urgedduke in college you need to slide into the base, if the second basemen is in the baseline you can take him out no problem. If he is just a step out of the line you cant make contact with him by saying you were able to reach the base with your hand, your feet must go into the bag. If this rule is not followed, the double play is assumed and 2 outs will be given.
bpife55 5 months ago
@urgedduke Not in high school or college, only in the pros
CousinItt001 5 months ago
The ruling is that the runner who was out on a force at home did not legally slide and therefore the umpire called the batter-runner out at first also because of the interference. The runner from third was not ejected. The rule is called the force play slide rule and states that unless sliding directly into the bag or plate on a force play, meaning an area the width of the bag, the runner is out and if the fielder is making a throw to another base for a second force that runner is also out.
CousinItt001 6 months ago
haha
ludwicks 6 months ago
IM A HIGHSCHOOL CATCHER AND I THINK ALL THESE RULES ARE GAY IF YOU f ING TAKLE HIM AT HOME YES THATS AN OUT BUT I MEAN IT SHOULD BE THE SAME AT HOME LIKE SECOND WHEN BREAKING A DOUBLEPLAY IF YOU CAN TAKE HIM OUT AND STILL BE ABLE TO REACH THE BAG OR PLATE ITSHOULD BE FINEJUST DONT GO AND TAKE HIM OUT SO HE ENDS UP FLYING TEN FEET MAKE IT CLEAN BUT THATS THE GAME!
schutzstaffa 6 months ago
@schutzstaffa I agree with you, but all caps is really annoying and completely unnecessary.
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
this was a great play of the week for the spirit of the game that was representated by the catcher pretending a double play, while the man running to home prenteds to score, the slice is effective but the catcher is awesome even whitout knowing
psyferrer 6 months ago
ur a fucking pussy if you run over the catcher you have a running start and the catcher just stands there
TheFootballa99 6 months ago
@TheFootballa99 I think this guy was probably doing it because it was legal, but let's have a breakdown of what the ruling on running over a catcher is. The ruling on running outside of the baseline is that if you stray outside of the baseline so as to avoid a tag, you're out. If the catcher has the ball, and he's standing in the sideline you're out if you don't try to go through him. That leaves the option of sliding feet first which is the slide that is the easiest to get a tag on...
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
@TheFootballa99 ...headfirst which leaves you likely to get injured (ask Josh Hamilton if you don't believe me) or running over the guy with gear on to prevent him from getting injured in the manner that the baserunner might. Now, you claim to be a "footballa", but it sounds more like you're just a nigger (and no I'm not calling you that because I think you're black, you just sound like an ignorant piece of shit) and running backs try to run over people that may just be standing there...
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
@TheFootballa99 ...because it's within the confines of the rules. Taking out the catcher is within the confines of the rules of baseball. Oh btw, my original comment was supposed to be started out as him believing it was legal. In conclusion, to do anything besides taking the catcher out will most likely result in the baserunner being out, so this makes me think that if you're really trying to win a game, the "fucking pussy" would be the one that would NOT try to run over the catcher.
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
@TheFootballa99 SOOOOOO... in short, you're wrong :)
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
I wish that the result of the play was a Top Comment instead of a five year old insult about mentally challenged people.
JWilliamson1987 6 months ago
The guy who tackles the catcher is a dick!
LewisTheDogue 6 months ago
@LewisTheDogue I think you're a dick! He did something that he probably thought was legal, and he was called out for it. People make mistakes all the time, it doesn't mean you're a dick. (btw, I was kidding about saying you're a dick, I was just making a point that people who make mistakes aren't necessarily dicks ergo you.)
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
@cwalk50rice Dick or no,..the guy is still a dick!
LewisTheDogue 6 months ago
shuda been thrown out of the game
scott9002ca 6 months ago
@scott9002ca It isn't like he tried to hurt the guy. He did a take-out slide just like you can do at second base probably because he thought it was legal. It was runner interference. Plain and simple... He shouldn't have been thrown out of the game, he should have been called out which he was. If the other team felt it warranted something more severe then they probably threw at him.
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
Haha i love how the catcher reacts and gets all pumped up... he's like, "Fuck yeah, that guy just made me look like a bitch, WOOHOO!"
Hollywoodsty0113 6 months ago
@Hollywoodsty0113 ? How does he look like a bitch the guy slides into him you would fall to dumb ass and i'm a catcher and have been for 3 years almost anytime you get slid into your going to fall.
bestwaffleg 6 months ago
dude my secound year catching a girl slamed staight into me knocking me out. That was nothen
GirlSinger1000 7 months ago
If you bothered listening the announcer said its a rule specific to college.
Stangil1 7 months ago
0:35 to 0:37 LOL
DeathLord897 7 months ago
thats stupid
myalovelove 7 months ago
Lol, 0:34
BradROBLOX 7 months ago
Runner interference what wusses.
clark15107 7 months ago
if hes in the runners base path no interference.. catchers fault he didnt position himself out of the base path on the throw down to first
basebll61 7 months ago
Geez that's totally interference! Mainly because if you pause at 4 seconds you can tell the catcher already caught the ball and the runners out BEFORE he even starts to slide. That automatically makes his slide into the catcher intentional and an interference.
travargev10 7 months ago
@travargev10 It's actually completely legal. Even though he clearly could have slid without hitting the catcher, he is still on the baseline. Watch any other game: runners advancing to second always charge towards 2nd base/SS to try to throw off the double play to first. It's the same exact thing, just a different plate.
soccerdude654321 7 months ago
Title "Catcher Gets Taken Out" I'm sorry i didn't see shit ... fuck u CBS
tifa1209 8 months ago
umm.. this was a good call.. who ever said this isn't interference is an idiot.. if he slid into his foot or hit the back of his heal it wouldn't be interference... he slid on the front side of his leg with the intention of trying to trip him which he did.. and this isn't a rule specific to college its in most levels of baseball.. its better if u stop the clip at 15 sec not 5 and ull see how much clearer the interference is
curveballmick 8 months ago
so if the runner interferes with the thrower, it end the inning?
LiveTheAlexLife 8 months ago
damn baseball college are full of douchebags
omguregood 8 months ago
@omguregood ya colleges are full of douchebags and sports jocks are even worse yuh dumbfuck
meestachao400 8 months ago
i hate it when people do this there obviously out so dont try and ruin somebodies life. i was standing 4 feet off the plate and a kid slid AFTER home and slid right into my legs wich injured my knee. he shouldve been thrown out.
amd3366 8 months ago
this is why baseball is for solid pussys,,,u mke any sort of body contact u fags start crying about it and an out is called...how f****** gay he should be save
bassallyear 8 months ago
@doug77082 and @danesters guy spent almost 300 comments arguing back in forth...what is there to argue about here because clearly the runner slid out of the path to take out catcher...and u spent 300 comments to figure it out? good job
Joncjmc 9 months ago 4
asssssholleeeee
ITzJpiZzlE 9 months ago
College baseball sucks...
stupieboy 9 months ago
if he didnt slide into thecatcher they wouldnt get the double play
litojonny 9 months ago
ke festeja el catcher si de todos modos tira mal y le anotan carrera
PayeManZithoek 9 months ago
Out by runner interference?! what the fuck kind of rule is that? you never about that in the MLB!!!!!
2112Metal 9 months ago
FUCK YOU CBS! can't even watch the damn video
sweetspeed21 10 months ago
none of CBS's videos load for me? Every other video on youtube works perfect, but not 1 from CBS
kushkushkushipush 10 months ago
Dudes is it just me or does this happens to somebody else ? I can't fucking watch the video.. it just doesn't load it keeps buffering ..
tatazike 10 months ago 7
why didnt he just end the inning tagging him out at home? why did he throw it ?
TheOneSensation 10 months ago
@TheOneSensation the bases were loaded, he got the guy out at home by stepping on the plate (force out) and threw to first to get the second out.
Unstopablx 10 months ago
@Unstopablx my bad, didnt realize he stepped on it
TheOneSensation 10 months ago
looks like he did a split but still a nice play
18babyaj 10 months ago
doung77082 and danesters, u guys need lives, put it this way, evrybody is good at a sport, kobe is basketball, posey is baseball, i garuntee that neither one of them could play the other sport that good,(and to hit a baseball, it isnt that hard)
nitroslayer2 10 months ago
@nitroslayer2 and u dont play baseball faggot u probably dont know that u dont just swing and u hit it so actually its not that easy if it was everybody would be batting .1000
07trizzle 10 months ago
@07trizzle i dont paly baseball?little faggot u dont know shit, i do play baseball, and all you got to do is read the ball out of his hand, load, and swing and keeping your eyes on the ball. and u dont need to bitch about it, i just made a statement. and you probably have know idea what your talking about. i played my whole life, and i still am
nitroslayer2 10 months ago
@nitroslayer2 Hitting a baseball is the absolute hardest thing to do in any sport. There is a reason the best hitters in the world can only have success ~30% of the time.
TheAmazingAnarchist1 10 months ago
@TheAmazingAnarchist1 that's true but it doesn't mean they don't get some great runs with 100% hits now and then :D I love this sport lol, just a shame it's not as convenient (with required space and number of players). I think @nitroslayer2 was mostly reacting to an offensive post by @07trizzle and doesn't mean to say it's not true but does say it's a lot about instinct and athletic ability.
uberduke 9 months ago
good call
SuperBaseball53 10 months ago
nice try though dude
.. that slide just a lil more inside might have gotten away with it.. also did you see how bad he jacked that throw to 1st ,,,,,ha ha.
ckqinva 10 months ago
More like "Catcher gets gently tipped over"
MrAmateurCovers 11 months ago 3
das a soft cll
2002Smalls 11 months ago
0:30 - But his feet went inside.
hallpriest9 11 months ago
I'll admit it was a good effort but that was just blatantly away from the plate the catcher's legs were completely away from the plate. If baseball has the same rules to second base they should apply to home plate. In that situation with the catcher facing away from the runner and a blatant slide, I deem that a dirty play.
ahtartersauce101 11 months ago
why is this a bid deal. does it not happen often?
xdudeyourcool 11 months ago
@xdudeyourcool
It does often happen. The big deal on here is that there are those who don't think it should be an automatic out for player interference just because a runner goes after the catcher to break up a play.
darthba11er 11 months ago
Thats a lame ass rule. That was an amazing play by the runner.
tylercrane 1 year ago
@tylercrane Not exactly. They have a rule like this in football. It's called a pass interference.
RedSandStudios 11 months ago
@tylercrane it's not football or rugby or hockey, if you're saying that it's a lame rule, then you can practically tackle a guy and give him a concussion, and ruin his career.
exmecan1 11 months ago
What a dumb dumb rule. It should only be runner interferance if he runs out of the baseline but it's just like football.....in college the rules gotta be diffrence. I remember my 1st college game where we went into overtime. I was like Wait a minute, this is diffrent.
screwdabrewcrew 1 year ago
@screwdabrewcrew its not a dumb rule, cause you're practically saying that we should be able to tackle someone from behind, whenever we want. Baseball isn't about physical contact between two players.
exmecan1 11 months ago
@exmecan1 It's dumb because it's different. They should follow the rules just like major league baseball. For example they should use wooden bats but you're saying, "No the real rules aren't good enough so let's just make up our own rules as we go along." That's pathetic
screwdabrewcrew 11 months ago
@screwdabrewcrew what do you mean different? this rule applies for every baseball league in the world.
exmecan1 11 months ago
I've seen 3 times "get a life" in last comments here and one of them is in highest rated section
1SFODdelta 1 year ago
Lol that happened to me a few times.
BrokenDanceFloor 1 year ago
thats a red card!!
:)
narcocholo420 1 year ago
@narcocholo420 they have plenty of red cards to go around! :)
Ekatsvids 1 year ago
Why is it a double play??? If this happened at 2nd base it'd be fine.
livefrom201 1 year ago
if the catcher doesn't move can the runner rock his world?
jdswiney 1 year ago
@jdswiney not if its a force but if he has to make the tag, then the runner has to not throw an elbow and he can try to run him over
hankdablonde 1 year ago
USD!
chargers705 1 year ago
I think that the runner was about to slide and then the second he slid the catcher put his foot in front of the plate.
TheLPlayer1 1 year ago
All those comments probably have taken at least a day to type, maybe more. If you multiply that by all the other videos they probably have commented on, thats at least a week wasted of their "life".
jakawaka1212 1 year ago
whata a tool trying to take out a catcher. if that was pro he would have gotten fined. whoever purposely tries to take out a catcher after being out is a douche.
tnissle 1 year ago
@tnissle Obviously you never played baseball mongoloid. He was trying to break up a double play.
CMC13C 11 months ago
@CMC13C I was a college catcher first off. Many careers have been ended because someone barrels into a catcher who doesn't even have the baseball yet. So yes I am prejudice and in favor of sliding into the bag and not the catchers legs when playing at the college level.
tnissle 9 months ago
@tnissle His fuckin foot's planted square on the base line. No shit he slid into his leg, it was right in front of the plate! Bullshit call.
Crevan1986 8 months ago
@Crevan1986 Paused at 5 seconds and the runner's left foot is darn near 3 feet in front of the plate. You can not be 3 feet in front of the plate if sliding directly into the plate.
ILOVEUMPS 8 months ago
@ILOVEUMPS Pause it at 5 seconds, see that white line that the Runner's running down? That's called a base line. Imagine it keeps going all the way and doesn't disappear in the dirt. See how it goes right across the plate? His leg was in the baseline, his fault for getting hit.
Crevan1986 8 months ago
I never thought i would read as much pointless shit, but its kinda intresting to see how much of an ass people can make out of them selfs Welcome to America =) thumbs up if u like to ski
CRproductions14 1 year ago
ATTACK
543oliviae 1 year ago
Everybody is a baby
nuclearthreat545 1 year ago
For those who are wondering, it's a 29 page argument. next time someone calls me a douche for one argument, i'm sending them this link.
Baseball5030 1 year ago 3
good calll very dirty slide
2222jetsfan 1 year ago
penis????
Boombot43 1 year ago
lol. Cheater caught!
zany2x 1 year ago
Pretty gay rule. Can't take out people. Why take out a fun part of the game? Who cares about possible injury; it's all part of the game.
And yeah, doug77082, you are a moron. d/dx(sin(x))=cos(x) moron, it's not "undefined". Now go blow your math tutor and shut the fuck up. You seriously need a boyfriend.
ComicallySanePolitic 1 year ago
Comment removed
ComicallySanePolitic 1 year ago
That looked pretty intentional to me, and doug what's his ass needs to get laid and shut the hell up
theRECREATABLE 1 year ago
@doug77082 chill dog, why are you being so gay?
jkwan3292 1 year ago 2
You guys are still fighting??? Man, you guys are pathetic. Go get a life, dudes.
lapd1020 1 year ago 56
This has been flagged as spam show
@lapd1020 Arguing on YouTube is like the special olympics.wether you win or lose,your still retarted.
ectoplasem13 9 months ago 30
@ectoplasem13 You got that right. People are just wasting their lives on stupid arguments.
lapd1020 9 months ago
@ectoplasem13 So is taking jokes
Defaults90 9 months ago
@ectoplasem13 You must be retarDed.You spelled retard wrong, whether wrong, and didn't make whether start with a capital. Grammar Nazi to the RESCUE!
xPerfectionlst 7 months ago
@ectoplasem13 Haha, I think it is rather ironic that you are bringing into question others intelligence, and the word you used to do it you spelled incorrectly.
taler8988 6 months ago
@ectoplasem13
You raise a valid point about arguing on youtube, how ever you are still a moron. In just one sentence you managed to misspell whether, you're, and retarded.
NairbSenoj 6 months ago 43
@NairbSenoj It's "however,"
GreenPeck2 6 months ago
@NairbSenoj why do people give a fuck how i spell shit on the interenet? you can still understand it right and honestly i dont even notice. you spelled however even though i'm sure you re-read that sentence like 10 times to make sure it had no errors in it.
tl;dr spelling errors happen who the fuck cares?
DefinitelyNotMike 5 months ago
@NairbSenoj Do you want me to argue with you, I don't think so because you will never win.
ConcepcionPR 5 months ago
@ConcepcionPR Argue with you? Where did you come from, and why are you calling me out on trying to argue with you? I never said a word to you...
NairbSenoj 2 months ago
@ectoplasem13 Ha you spelled retarded wrong you ape.
thomcat1991 6 months ago
@ectoplasem13 Yeah, but when you call other people "retarted" and you misspell retarded then you kind of look "retarted"... wouldn't you say?
cwalk50rice 6 months ago
@ectoplasem13 You might be taken seriously if you could spell "retarded" correctly...
snoozer998 5 months ago
Comment removed
IbeLangley 5 months ago
@ectoplasem13 Would you say that to a special olympics athlete?
captainkunty 5 months ago
@ectoplasem13 LOL "RETARTED"
NOW I KNOW A RETARD FOR SURE :D
Theguy7161996 5 months ago
doug77082 and danesters you are both fucking retarded..
gravew0lf 1 year ago 34
Hahaha wow fighting over basic calculus... For god sakes its a video about a play get off eachothers dicks and enjoy the video
antiracism101 1 year ago
Guys shut the fuck up. You are both pretentious dumbasses...
ZanderTheLegendary 1 year ago
note to ppl writing fucking paragraphs, i dont think the rest of the world other than u two care about what you to say so y dont u stop makin paragraphs, from wat i c is this is a stupid fight, just chill out and live in peace
VoiceVampire 1 year ago
@VoiceVampire Note to the loser who typed this useless piece of shit...nobody cares so stop fucking whining loser. We all know you need attention. There is no fight and others have added their comments. If you have nothing to say pertaining to the conversation, shut your cockholster, wipe your chin and move on.
doug77082 1 year ago
Now that that is out of the way...No hockey is not the hardest sport. Yes, the hand to eye coordination needs to be fast and sometimes with a less reaction time, but the goalie himself takes up a majority of the space within the goalie already LIMITING the chances of a player making it in.Even if the goalie stood in a specific position and didn't move,the players chance is already very limited that it would go in.Lastly, the puck to glove size is a MASSIVE difference compared to baseball and bat
danesters 1 year ago
@danesters By YOUR comparison, hockey is tougher. 1. The puck has a much smaller surface area than a baseball. 2. The puck goes FASTER than a baseball. 3. To hit a moving puck on s slapshot and place the puck into a very small area to get it past the goalie into a goal not only with COMMON SENSE is tougher than simply "hitting a baseball", the percentage that it occurs is MUCH LESS than a baseball getting hit. In fact, HOME RUNS happen a higher rate than slap shot goals. So you're wrong.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters Um, no retard, that is NOT out of the way. The two of us just schooled you by ACTUAL scientific proof that goals are scored on a MUCH LESS percentage than baseballs are hit for starters. But now you opened up your little cockholster, so I'll put you ont he spot and emarrass you and UCLA at the same time. WRITE ME A MATHEMATICAL PROOF that PROVES your point. I can tel lyou now that you can't because you haven't set any parameters to prove. Are you THAT FUCKING STUPID?
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 Now genius, prove to me that if a statement says ALL and I came up with an instance that disproved ALL...HOW IN THE FUCK CAN THAT STATMENT BE TRUE? Are you seriously that fucking retarded? This is SIMPLE LOGIC that you should have learned in HIGH SCHOOL. I can't believe you're still even arguing this. I never said you can't compare shit...but you can't compare wihtout KNOWN PARAMETERS. You simply CAN NOT.
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 You can NOT say IF A=B and B=C, then A=F. There is NO LOGICAL COMPARISON OF "F" to "A, B or fucking C". RETARD. Do you fucking not get this? For someone who is SUPPOSEDLY a college student, you have been presented with actual mathematical and scientific proof. Now prove to me that you can compare A, B, or C to fucking F in that statement. You can NOT because like your stupid ass statement, you do NOT KNOW THE PARAMETERS, thus NO COMPARISON CAN BE MADE IDIOT. YOU ARE STUPID.
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 The sad thing is, you still are trying to set your own parameters AS YOU GO ALONG to make your argument and even THEN you are failing. 90%? ROFLMA...Please do tell me where that scientific number comes from. That's the odds that you'll be left jerkin' off at the age of 40 efore getting some pussy unless your sister finally puts out. What is worse is when you are scientically proven WRONG...you aren't man enough to admit it...go UCLA. I'm sure they love you there. FUCKSTICK IDIOT
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters When you say "hitting a baseball is scientifcally proven than any other action in sport" THAT is the original argument...AN ACTION IN A SPORT IS AN ATTEMPT AT A 100 YARD FG. THEREFORE...pay attention moron...this ONE STATEMENT has DISPROVEN the original argument. If you knew ANYTHING about logic (and it is obvious that you do not), than any one statement that disproves the original argument means the argument is FALSE. THAT I can prove to you. I'll write MY proof right now.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters Pay attention loser.All UCLA students are GAY. Mark attends UCA and he's a heterosexual (unlike yourself). THEREFORE, that ONE INSTANCE disproves that argument that ALL STUDENTS AT UCLA ARE GAY (though I'm sure the majority are). THE VAGUE STATEMENT THAT HITTING A BASEBALL IS TOUGHER THAN ANY OTHER EVEN IN SPORTS since I have presented at least ONE that negates that vague staement makes the statement FALSE. Hence there are some comparisons that are as stupid as you. SCHOOLED.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters Your dumb ass reminds me of the army fags that used to tell us Marines how much tougher the army was than the Marine Corps and how much "more skilled" they were right before a range competition where the top 10 shooters were ALL Marines including myself and even Air Force and Navy Personnel were in the top 20 with NO army guys. Go figure. You remind me of those same losers who can't bare to say yiou were wrong even after absolute proof. Let's see YOUR proof now genius.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters And now that we got THAT out of the way, your option right now is to offer MATHEMATICAL PROOF that there is NO SITUATION IN ANY OTHER SPORT THAT IS TOUGHER THAN HITTING A BASEBALL...Challenge the one I gave that negates it in fact....a 100 yard FG...that's tougher...it defeats that dumbshit statement as an argument. Prove it wrong and you can save face for UCLA...but you can't because 0% is much less than a fucking quadrapelgic can accomplish swinging the bat. So you're wrong.
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 Your own fucking brain calculates your percentage but you can't even fucking realize it!!! Why do you think people think it's harder to hit 90 MPH then it is to hit a 60 MPH..Because its all statistics, and they realize their chances are lower..With every play there is a percent...Again, if I can get a percent in a baseball play and a percent in a football play we can compare which is more difficult....Give me a play in football and a play in baseball and I will show you....
danesters 1 year ago
@danesters Once again, even in the realm of baseball you make a stupid argument. Not EVERYONE would say it is tougher to hit a 90 MPH fastball than a ball thrown at 60mph...especially if that 60 mph pitch is a KNUCKLE BALL. Why do you continue to make dumbshit arguments that are based on an assumption of paramaters? This is goes back to the ORIGINAL ARGUMENT which you were proven wrong and showed everyone you are simply not man enough to own up to it. You have, however, avoided it.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters Again, no, if you get a percentage of one action in baseball, and another in football, you can compare the NUMBERS, but the numbers are meaningless. Again, your original argument SET NO FUCKING PARAMETERS...and you're still an idiot because you circumnavigated even attempting to show the mathetmatical proof whereas I clearly supported several arguments against the original statement. Now we're comparing a more realistic 70 yard FGA that HAS occurred and none made...0% is less again.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters And yet again, you are still an idiot and you still are wrong. I didn't ask for a book that takes the point to Africa and back. I asked for your to prove to me that there are NO ACTIONS IN ANY OTHER SPORT THAT CARRY A LESS PERCENTAGE THAN THE PERCENTAGE OF A BASEBALL BEING HIT IN A MANNER IN WHICH IS LANDS IN FAIR TERRITORY. That is the original argument. Prove it. I've disproven it. 60 yard FGA's occur at a much lesser rate. In hockey, goals per shots on goal is much less.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters I have given you SEVERAL occasions that disprove the original argument and instead of showing proof, you focus on the 100 yard FGA and ignore the rest? THAT is how you debate? You're also too stupid to realize that getting a percentage of two unrelated events and comparing that number is NOT the same as comparing those two events. I'll leave you with a few simple math problems and I want answers, not another book running away from the argument. One is EASY...now is yoru time..
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 Holy shit YOU'RE a nut ball...First off being in shape has nothing to do with the SKILL LEVEL in a sport. I've said that a billion times....YEAH, track is very difficult sport, it sure takes a lot of talent to RUN!! No one can run, that is soo very difficult.
Secondly, I will not be answering ANY of your questions until you have answered my questions you have avoided from the beginning...Then I'll answer your lame ass math formulation....
danesters 1 year ago
@danesters Dumbshit, it is obvious that you chose yet to go off on other tangents yet again and you evaded the very simple questions that were asked for you. You are no longer worthy of this debate. I never said that being in shape had anything to do with skill, so for you to state it and speak for me only demonstrates your obvious desparation to be right about SOMETHING, but you only showed further how lost you truly are. That was NEVER a point that was being debated.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters YOU are the one who chose to move away from the original argument and talk about how football players were fat, remember? So YOU mention it and then bring it up later to call yourself wrong and somehow distort that to be me? Why? Is this something that works for you with your little sister when you debate with her over girlscout cookies? You made the comment that a center fielder was faster than anyone in every other sport. So you were proven wrong yet again & change topics.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters If you want to mock speed not being a factor in "difficulty" then why did you state that a center field was faster than any other positional player in any other sport? Of COURSE you won't be answering any of my questions..you CAN'T! You are not intelligent enough to answer those questions, but you want to tell me you are a college student and you know mathematics? You are supposedly college educated in math on a high level, but you don't know basic math. Figures.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters And do NOT play that little game where you simply SAY that I avoided anything from the beginning. I have been restating the ORIGINAL STATEMENT MADE IN THE BEGINNING and I proved it wrong. You said clearly "THERE IS SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT HITTING A BASEBALL IS THE MOST DIFFICULT ACTION OF ANY ACTION IN ANY SPORT". I proved it wrong and you said you were this great mathematician and I proved you were a liar. You know NOTHING about math or probability or sports in general. Avoid it.
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 My question to you is, "Is there a percentage I can get of a batters chance of hitting the ball in fair play? "
"Is there a percentage I can get of a kicker kicking in a field goal from a certain distance?"
If I can do that I can compare! How many times soes it take for your small brain to understand what the "NORM" means..You are the one proving to be as stupid as a wall of bricks. Is a 70 yard field fucking norm?!?! NO, no one ever attempts that either...
danesters 1 year ago
@danesters Yes, there IS a percentage you can get of hitting the ball into fair play and I NEVER denied that. I told you that comparing THAT PERCENTAGE to other percentages of other actions means absolutly nothing and it means just that. YOU then said if that percentate is lower than another action, that means it is MORE DIFFICULT and I proved to you there are MANY OTHER ACTIONS in MANY OTHER SPORTS that have a lower percentage, so you're wrong. What about this do you not get?
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters For you to continue to say that a mathematical percentage can be computated, but not understand that comparing that percentage to a percentage of another event is meaningingless only shows your lack of intelligence. For you to apply the made up "NORM' NOW AFTER THE FACT is something you also do not seem to get and the NORM is only how YOU want to manipulate the statistics. Define the NORM...something you STILL have yet to do except to NOW attempt to set the parameter AFTER the fact.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters And NOW I can simply prove you completey wrong. You said "no one EVER attempts a 70 yard FG and since it HAS been attempted, than the phrase NO ONE EVER makes your statement wrong. Yes, someone HAS and nobody has MADE IT. So yes, that proves your argument wrong. 60 yard FGAs are even more common and I will tell you much less of THOSE are made than contact made with a baseball...but you can again manipulate stats and state "20 yard FGs". You are NOT getting that point.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters Just because after your pathetically ridiculous argument that you can set parameters of data to make your argument true, that does NOT make the argument true at all. So no, hitting a baseball into fair play is NOT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN AS THE MOST DIFFICULT ACTION TO OCCUR IN ANY SPORT. You evading the topic and setting parametes to meet the argument AFTER the fact shows how weak and pathetic you truly are. Your lack of intelligence is much too obvious. Your desperation shows.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters Here you go genius... 1. What is the derivative of SIN X? 2. What is the derivative of COS X? One and two are EASY. 3. What is greater? A. 50% of X or B. 50% of Y? Number 3 is the one that will prove you wrong. It is simple though..which is bigger? 4. If A > B and B>C then what is A in respect to D?
Now answer the questions direclty or once again, shut the fuck up and stop evading shit you know proves you are wrong. You evaded the questions last time..this will be the 2nd.
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 I said taking percentages of NORMAL plays...Plays that occur a MAJORITY of the time....Really??!?!?! 70 yard field goals are a MAJORITY of the time?!?!? Wow, you are dumb and shit. Thanks for showing everyone how smart you really are...Just the fact that I've had to tell you at least 5 times that we are talking about the average play and you still don't fucking understand that means you are STUPID AS SHIT!!
danesters 1 year ago
@danesters NO, you DIDN"T say anything about percentages of normal plays until AFTER l posted my statement that negated your ridiculous comment. It was NOT originally stated. You said that AFTER the fact to try to set a parameter that would make the argument true. That lack of any set parameters in the beginning was the point of this debate that you seem to ignore out of convenience. Even so, you can not DEFINE what is "normal" and so you can't possibly use that to make an argument.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters The fact that you aren't man enough to show you know when you are wrong only tells me you are some little punk kid who feels the need to always be right no matter how much you are wrong because somehow your daddy made you feel bad about being such a dumbshit little punk. I'll let you have the "norm" right now...DEFINE THE NORM. You can't and even doing so is nothign more than you NOW setting parameters to manipulate data to make yourself feel like the statement is accurate.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters Once again, I went back and reinstated the original argument and I addressed your pathetic reach to attempt to define the "norm" to set a parameter NOW that helps you and in all senses, you are wrong. NOW lets see if at least your honesty prevails here since I have addressed your comments directly...let's see you answer those questions I have you so maybe you can at LEAST demonstrate that expertise in mathematics that you claim to have that allows you to think you're smart.
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters To add to my questions, you need to define to me what you think the average play is in football...or hockey...or basketball....ohhhh. How about GOLF? I'd say that a HOLE IN ONE is much more difficult to make than hitting a baseball into fair territory and it certainly occurs at a rate MUCH LESS than baseball. You can even set the parameter by percentage because hitting a tee shot is the NORM in golf. How many times do you need to be proven wrong?
doug77082 1 year ago
@danesters I even allow you to set these parameters AFTER the fact and still prove your dumb ass wrong with your own cheating of the semantics and logic of this debate. That's pretty fucking sad. Now be a man of your word and stop being a little avoiding punk and answer those questions and show us all you are fucking CLUELESS to mathematics and probablity. You made a stupid comment and figured if you said "scientific proof" that it made you right. You're wrong and you're a dishonest punk.
doug77082 1 year ago
@doug77082 Going off of my first statement, which was, "The toughest thing to do in all sports is to hit a round baseball going 95 MPH with a round bat (And get it in fair play)"...That was my original statement, somehow it keeps changing a little bit more everytime you tell me what my "ORIGINAL" statement was..If you take this out of CONTEXT, yes, it could prove my argument false...Because we all know that kicking a 100 yard field goal is more difficult because it can't be done....
danesters 1 year ago
@danesters That's right...and that statement sets ZERO PARAMETERS FOR COMPARISON TO ANY OTHER EVENT...it also said "IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN" which was the exact point I made...it is NOT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN. It is merely YOUR DUMBSHIT OPINION. Is this really that complicated for you junior? So yes, thanks for restating...and proving me right yet again...TOUGHEST AS OPPOSED TO WHAT? ANYTHING? When yu say TOUGHEST, that means tougher than ANYTHING ELSE. HOLY SHIT.
doug77082 1 year ago