Recently I was unfortunate enough to come across a copy of David Aaronovitch's anti-'conspiracy theory' book in a charity shop, and flicked through it briefly. On one page he was criticising various researchers for making money out of 'gullible' people through doing the rounds in the alternative media to push sales of their books and products.
Of course he's not making any money out of writing and publishing his book of ad hominem attacks, is he? The hypocritical fat fuck...
@theylive23 Indeed, and I find it arrogant that he'd call them gullible, as if they are too stupid to make their own decisions. Maybe, just maybe they did the research.
@MistrBrit How bizarre was that though? I'm with you, I can't help but feel there's some kind of agenda behind it. Fox wouldn't even admit that 9/11 could have been blowback now they talk about Building 7?
I read the conspiricy paper, which is only about 50 odd pages long, the references are scant and their idea of trustworthy people to reference is questionable? But more importantly go to their website and see who is involved, it has a lot of political cronies and unknown researchers. Are these think tanks should be truly independant? Looks to me like an extension of the Tavistock Institute, in short another self elected soft kill socialist propaganda group for the elite.
Recently I was unfortunate enough to come across a copy of David Aaronovitch's anti-'conspiracy theory' book in a charity shop, and flicked through it briefly. On one page he was criticising various researchers for making money out of 'gullible' people through doing the rounds in the alternative media to push sales of their books and products.
Of course he's not making any money out of writing and publishing his book of ad hominem attacks, is he? The hypocritical fat fuck...
theylive23 1 year ago
@theylive23 Indeed, and I find it arrogant that he'd call them gullible, as if they are too stupid to make their own decisions. Maybe, just maybe they did the research.
wideshutuk 1 year ago
@theylive23 aaronovitchs book is shit.
I read it.I follow him on twitter and told him so.
he is a lying cocksucker
Glenmead 1 year ago
Great effort - keep up the good work mate.
pankettleblack 1 year ago
@MistrBrit How bizarre was that though? I'm with you, I can't help but feel there's some kind of agenda behind it. Fox wouldn't even admit that 9/11 could have been blowback now they talk about Building 7?
wideshutuk 1 year ago
I read the conspiricy paper, which is only about 50 odd pages long, the references are scant and their idea of trustworthy people to reference is questionable? But more importantly go to their website and see who is involved, it has a lot of political cronies and unknown researchers. Are these think tanks should be truly independant? Looks to me like an extension of the Tavistock Institute, in short another self elected soft kill socialist propaganda group for the elite.
robertk1968 1 year ago
@robertk1968 Indeed, they are hardly independent of the political establishment.
wideshutuk 1 year ago