How do you suppose making something illegal is going to be relevant when you've ceded the authority of law by saying that you can violate any law you feel like?
How do you suppose you are going to regulate violent behavior by making a nonviolent action that has no victim a crime? Do you suppose the criminals will hand in their guns when they realize that guns are illegal? Do you suppose the drug cartels will stop shooting cops and trafficking narcotics if we tell them they can't own guns?
It literally would not be an exaggeration to say you have absolutely no idea how the Constitution of the United States works, would it? I'm guessing you're either not an American citizen or the American educational system has so thoroughly broken down that it is either not teaching students how the amendment process works or you are too retarded to be able to use Google.
The founding fathers included the right to bear arms so that tyrannical governments could be overthrown. There is a reason for gun control. Also a reason for FEMA camps and the executive order allowing the president under any catastrophe to declare martial law and suspend the other two branches of government & congress making him a dictator.
combine dark matter and uranium or some other chemical plutonium maybe it will make a worm hole just maybe if we focus it so that the exit is at the new planet
@alaskafido no its lower because there are less women drivers on the road and people believe women are more responsible so they are less likely to drive fast, race others and spend alot of time in the car cruising for girls which alot of guys do this raises the rates on men especially new drivers and men under 25.
@5H4K490 You're just plain wrong. The actual statistics, based on accident rate (not total numbers) shows men crashing at a higher rate across the board, but especially high in the youngest age category. Ergo, women are better drivers. Sorry.
PS stop saying anti-semitic. Semites are people of a particular language group of which Syrians are also a part. Your anti-jew, anti-israel or anti-zionist. No one can be anti english or semitic or any other language group either. It is programming which the US are suckers for.
sigh. i wasnt really expecting a gun control discussion. read the last four words of the 2nd amendment and thats all that needs to be said in this video.
@alphacause , you go right ahead and think we wouldnt stand a chance in urban warfare, you probably couldnt hang....remember this, there are now 100,000 recently (10yrs) discharged military who will fight and train our willing combatants! Buy guns people, lots of them! Better to be safe than sorry!
Gun nuts are stupid to think this was anything but a ploy by gun manufactures to get people to buy more guns. They are imbecilic for believing that even with all the weapons they could buy, that somehow they could combat the U.S. gov./military. We are not living during 1776 where the average citizenry could match weaponry with the army. We are living in the age of the predator drone! Republicans actual think that an armed citizen uprising, like in the the movie Red Dawn, is plausible. Idiots!
@alphacause This argument - that a private citizen can't buy weaponry comparable to military - is correct to a point. However:
The difference between a shotgun, rifle, or pistol and whatever you can lay hands on - kitchen knife, club, whatever - is far greater than the difference between the shotgun and the predator drone. Especially if the guy with the shotgun gets the drop on the drone operator.
It's the difference between 100% helpless and having a chance.
I was hoping you would talk about the new planet that was found. Unfortunately it's 600 light years away. And Of course since getting there in anything less than 600 years would break all the laws of current physics. The only way we could get there in my opinion would require negative energy or negative matter if it exists to open a worm hole/warp drive.
@CyborgClown we could send a radio message and hope that there are tech advanced beings there to respond. We could get a response as early as 3200 AD.
It depends on what, your fucking fancy? I quoted the Constitution you fucking idiot. It depends on the Constitution, seeing as the Constitution is, and I quote, the "Supreme law of the land." Any law, according to John Marshall, Supreme Court Justice, that violates the Constitution is by definition null and void.
@Redfingers Well, for one thing it DEPENDS on the general public having common sense among other things like gun safety training and proper gun and ammo. storage as well as government tracking and registering of legally purchased guns for the sake of knowing the location of where lethal weapons are kept. But, seeing that you are a frothing at the mouth nutcase I doubt any of what I've said would register in that puny brain of yours.
It depends on nothing, you idiot, the text of the Constitution is sacrosanct. The only leeway you have is in the margins and in what is not explicitly stated. Anything that violates the text of the second amendment is, based on the most fundamental Supreme Court precedent, by definition null and void.
@Redfingers "It depends on nothing, you idiot, the text of the Constitution is sacrosanct."
I see. In other words it's a religious text that is "sacred". It depends on NOTHING because it can't be rationally justified with anything more basic than itself. I see now that I'm talking to an idiot.
@Redfingers Unreasonable laws cannot be followed or respected. There comes a point in time where a law is viewed as unreasonable because it's basic premise falls apart on closer inspection and when that time comes people will not respect it. You expect people to do otherwise?
Regardless of what you think, within this legal regime there are consequences for violating the law, and the Constitution, as the foundational document, when it establishes itself to be the Supreme law of the land, it is functionally the supreme law of the land. You cannot write a law that contradicts the Constitution without a Constitutional amendment that changes the Constitution. Good luck with that Jr.
@Redfingers Oh, there's plenty of times when laws have been enacted that doesn't follow the constitution. The constitution after all is just a piece of paper. Japanese Americans were interned in what could accurately be described as concentration camps during world war 2. Where's the right to peacefully assemble? What were their crimes? Then there's the prohibition period of the 1920's where certain substances was made illegal. Constitutionally speaking what "right" was violated?
Yeah, and then you can challenge those laws in court, and the Supreme Court can strike those laws as null and void based on the precedent of judicial review established in the first Supreme Court of the US under John Marshall.
Regarding prohibition, there was an actual Constitutional amendment making alcohol illegal, meaning prohibition became part of the Constitution and thus the Supreme law of the land. The repeal of prohibition was done with an amendment repealing that amendment.
@Redfingers Not the point. You missed the whole train of thought I'm trying to express. Do you usually do that when people discuss things with you?
The constitution is a piece of paper. Like you said before whoever in power can change it (or "amend" it) on a whim, a hunch or an opinion.
So the right to bear arms should be absolute and sacrosanct? Who said? Would you allow that "right" to repeat felons with a proven history of violence?
The Constitution is indeed a piece of paper but upon that piece of paper is the foundational and Supreme law of the United States, which cannot legally be violated by any law drafted by any state or by the federal legislature short of a Constitutional amendment.
Further, those amendments do not occur "on a whim," they require the legislature to propose an amendment which must be ratified by 75% of all state legislatures before it becomes law. The executive isn't involved.
@Redfingers (cont.) If you give me a gun without keeping track of it and then also allow me unlimited access to an untrackable, anonymous source of ammunition how do you or anybody else knows what I'm going to do with it? I could use it to keep a group of slaves chained up in a factory under the threat of death and continuously working to supply me with cheap products to sell for profit for all you know.
If I was unable to track your gun and your ammunition, that would imply that you could have purchased it illegally.
If you were keeping a group of slaves, that would be illegal. If you were planning on doing something illegal with the gun anyway, how would making guns illegal stop the problem?
That's funny, 'cause Riggs makes me want to throw-up..."...east of the river..."...nigga, please...what a fat-stupid-fuck...and Lulz...ain't no way these stupid fucks at RT was catchin' that Whitaker slip-up...that Ammo ad was as wackly low-budget as ALL of RTДмзя1кд's lamely produced BULLshit-ass "ads"...right down to the shitty metal soundtrack.
The American people should fear the corrupted government,When Politicians pass a Law/Bill like S-1867 that will put the Military on the street,Highways and Roads of America. It's best to be armed then unarmed. Many will think before doing this unconstitutional act of shooting a Armed American Citizen. When the prey can shoot back and they can be killed,it makes a big different.There are 150 Million Gun Owners in American.This is why they want to get rid of the 2nd Amend in The Constitution!.
Most countries in Europe have gun control and we don't see genocides. You know what we also don't see as often? Random killing sprees. Something we see in the US way too often.
riggs,blake,hansen.the happy hour shmuck of the day.alyona,i really need an explanation.why dude?they are not smart.they are not cool.they are terrible dressers (a purple striped shirt with a purple polka-dot tie?really,man?that's the best you can do?)at least jimbo made an effort with the grey jacket last week.are these churchill's boyfriends?just give us more tanya and kristine.please.
Sigh....guns to defend themselves against govt. How cheesy is that? the goddamn police show up with enough firearms and gear to knock down an army just to a goddamn police protest. If they show up and your house and try to take you, they can do it, and if you fight back they merely apply more force and charge you more heavily. Living in a dangerous neighborhood sure, but against improsonment and so forth? Bullshit.
You even missed the most ridiculous part about the ammo-ad: Left to Obama, that's FOREST WHITAKER (!) who played Idi Amin (a real dictator from Uganda) in "The Last King of Scottland"!
I came here for Kepler, not a debate about retarded republicans trying to find reason to bash Obama.
5:00 <- click that to skip to Kepler-22b.
Actually, just go find another video. This is just sad.
SadisticReviews 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Primate7776 1 month ago
Oops! Just more American bashing...
fillyfresh 2 months ago
Ok!!
What has this video, anything to do with Kepler-22b!
Almost nothing :(
TheExploradores 2 months ago
Hhahahaha dude at end uhhh that makes me what to throw up
9212mario 2 months ago
How do you suppose making something illegal is going to be relevant when you've ceded the authority of law by saying that you can violate any law you feel like?
How do you suppose you are going to regulate violent behavior by making a nonviolent action that has no victim a crime? Do you suppose the criminals will hand in their guns when they realize that guns are illegal? Do you suppose the drug cartels will stop shooting cops and trafficking narcotics if we tell them they can't own guns?
Redfingers 2 months ago
It literally would not be an exaggeration to say you have absolutely no idea how the Constitution of the United States works, would it? I'm guessing you're either not an American citizen or the American educational system has so thoroughly broken down that it is either not teaching students how the amendment process works or you are too retarded to be able to use Google.
Redfingers 2 months ago
The anti-Obama'ists put Breaking Benjamin as their back ground music? How ironic.
GenerationBright 2 months ago
The founding fathers included the right to bear arms so that tyrannical governments could be overthrown. There is a reason for gun control. Also a reason for FEMA camps and the executive order allowing the president under any catastrophe to declare martial law and suspend the other two branches of government & congress making him a dictator.
enjoiwrx 2 months ago
So...what what happened to Gliese 581 C,D & G?
Retrox90s 2 months ago
0:15 god bless you, ;)
FlashyLifeTV 2 months ago
Comment removed
FlashyLifeTV 2 months ago
combine dark matter and uranium or some other chemical plutonium maybe it will make a worm hole just maybe if we focus it so that the exit is at the new planet
Biship97 2 months ago
22degrees Celsius is approximately 71-1/2 degrees Fahrenheit. (9/5C+32)
barba3gr 2 months ago
This bitch really needs to stop drinking at work.
mrgraybutler 2 months ago
Step 3, high fives and chest bumps!
aaronpolitical 2 months ago
Comment removed
otomwaho 2 months ago
what a babe
MichaelKhanTV 2 months ago
These people are so dumb
claton95 2 months ago
Earth's twin? Uh, no. We don't even know if the planet has an atmosphere.
gatorhighlights4 2 months ago
Note for Mike Riggs: there's a reason women's insurance rates are lower than men's...women are better drivers.
alaskafido 2 months ago
@alaskafido no its lower because there are less women drivers on the road and people believe women are more responsible so they are less likely to drive fast, race others and spend alot of time in the car cruising for girls which alot of guys do this raises the rates on men especially new drivers and men under 25.
5H4K490 2 months ago
@5H4K490 You're just plain wrong. The actual statistics, based on accident rate (not total numbers) shows men crashing at a higher rate across the board, but especially high in the youngest age category. Ergo, women are better drivers. Sorry.
alaskafido 2 months ago
Jenny is correct. wow.
PS stop saying anti-semitic. Semites are people of a particular language group of which Syrians are also a part. Your anti-jew, anti-israel or anti-zionist. No one can be anti english or semitic or any other language group either. It is programming which the US are suckers for.
baalisgod666 2 months ago
are you guys on Youtube or also Tv
karimspiano 2 months ago
sigh. i wasnt really expecting a gun control discussion. read the last four words of the 2nd amendment and thats all that needs to be said in this video.
Grunt922 2 months ago
@alphacause , you go right ahead and think we wouldnt stand a chance in urban warfare, you probably couldnt hang....remember this, there are now 100,000 recently (10yrs) discharged military who will fight and train our willing combatants! Buy guns people, lots of them! Better to be safe than sorry!
freshkryp69 2 months ago
I love her reaction at the last 2 seconds! Funny!
freshkryp69 2 months ago
dammit your fucking fat racists and dumb ingnorant fucking horrible people, fund nasa
spaik007 2 months ago in playlist Fler videoklipp från TheAlyonaShow
Maybe I can move there to escape this corrupt-as-shit-on-batteries government.
IFUCKINGLOVEYOUTOO 2 months ago
Gun nuts are stupid to think this was anything but a ploy by gun manufactures to get people to buy more guns. They are imbecilic for believing that even with all the weapons they could buy, that somehow they could combat the U.S. gov./military. We are not living during 1776 where the average citizenry could match weaponry with the army. We are living in the age of the predator drone! Republicans actual think that an armed citizen uprising, like in the the movie Red Dawn, is plausible. Idiots!
alphacause 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAlyonaShow
@alphacause This argument - that a private citizen can't buy weaponry comparable to military - is correct to a point. However:
The difference between a shotgun, rifle, or pistol and whatever you can lay hands on - kitchen knife, club, whatever - is far greater than the difference between the shotgun and the predator drone. Especially if the guy with the shotgun gets the drop on the drone operator.
It's the difference between 100% helpless and having a chance.
Ansonidak 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAlyonaShow
Alyona Minkovski you are HOT!
FallenRaccoon 2 months ago 10
Mike Rigs was dead on at the end. Those were clearly women drivers.
notdonebefore 2 months ago
she's drinking martinis on the job. no wonder. wtf.
maalaea 2 months ago
i love alyona, but i think she meant to down play obama vs. guns but looked like she was laughing at genocide. pretty bad.
maalaea 2 months ago
Gun control and the elimination of the right to possess weaponry are not synonymous.
bunkmasterflex 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAlyonaShow
Drunk idiots....
DaveReality 2 months ago
kill all the youtube trolls.
thrashblackdeath666 2 months ago
I was hoping you would talk about the new planet that was found. Unfortunately it's 600 light years away. And Of course since getting there in anything less than 600 years would break all the laws of current physics. The only way we could get there in my opinion would require negative energy or negative matter if it exists to open a worm hole/warp drive.
CyborgClown 2 months ago 13
@CyborgClown we could send a radio message and hope that there are tech advanced beings there to respond. We could get a response as early as 3200 AD.
Zurround100 2 months ago
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Redfingers 2 months ago
@Redfingers Right so we should all own rocket launchers and that should be perfectly legal.
bunkmasterflex 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAlyonaShow
@Redfingers It depends.
technatezin 2 months ago
@technatezin
It depends on what, your fucking fancy? I quoted the Constitution you fucking idiot. It depends on the Constitution, seeing as the Constitution is, and I quote, the "Supreme law of the land." Any law, according to John Marshall, Supreme Court Justice, that violates the Constitution is by definition null and void.
Redfingers 2 months ago
@Redfingers Well, for one thing it DEPENDS on the general public having common sense among other things like gun safety training and proper gun and ammo. storage as well as government tracking and registering of legally purchased guns for the sake of knowing the location of where lethal weapons are kept. But, seeing that you are a frothing at the mouth nutcase I doubt any of what I've said would register in that puny brain of yours.
technatezin 2 months ago
@technatezin
It depends on nothing, you idiot, the text of the Constitution is sacrosanct. The only leeway you have is in the margins and in what is not explicitly stated. Anything that violates the text of the second amendment is, based on the most fundamental Supreme Court precedent, by definition null and void.
Redfingers 2 months ago
@Redfingers "It depends on nothing, you idiot, the text of the Constitution is sacrosanct."
I see. In other words it's a religious text that is "sacred". It depends on NOTHING because it can't be rationally justified with anything more basic than itself. I see now that I'm talking to an idiot.
technatezin 2 months ago
@technatezin
Are you unfamiliar with the way law works?
Redfingers 2 months ago
@Redfingers Unreasonable laws cannot be followed or respected. There comes a point in time where a law is viewed as unreasonable because it's basic premise falls apart on closer inspection and when that time comes people will not respect it. You expect people to do otherwise?
technatezin 2 months ago
@technatezin
Regardless of what you think, within this legal regime there are consequences for violating the law, and the Constitution, as the foundational document, when it establishes itself to be the Supreme law of the land, it is functionally the supreme law of the land. You cannot write a law that contradicts the Constitution without a Constitutional amendment that changes the Constitution. Good luck with that Jr.
Redfingers 2 months ago
@Redfingers Oh, there's plenty of times when laws have been enacted that doesn't follow the constitution. The constitution after all is just a piece of paper. Japanese Americans were interned in what could accurately be described as concentration camps during world war 2. Where's the right to peacefully assemble? What were their crimes? Then there's the prohibition period of the 1920's where certain substances was made illegal. Constitutionally speaking what "right" was violated?
technatezin 2 months ago
Yeah, and then you can challenge those laws in court, and the Supreme Court can strike those laws as null and void based on the precedent of judicial review established in the first Supreme Court of the US under John Marshall.
Regarding prohibition, there was an actual Constitutional amendment making alcohol illegal, meaning prohibition became part of the Constitution and thus the Supreme law of the land. The repeal of prohibition was done with an amendment repealing that amendment.
Redfingers 2 months ago
@Redfingers Not the point. You missed the whole train of thought I'm trying to express. Do you usually do that when people discuss things with you?
The constitution is a piece of paper. Like you said before whoever in power can change it (or "amend" it) on a whim, a hunch or an opinion.
So the right to bear arms should be absolute and sacrosanct? Who said? Would you allow that "right" to repeat felons with a proven history of violence?
technatezin 2 months ago
@technate
The Constitution is indeed a piece of paper but upon that piece of paper is the foundational and Supreme law of the United States, which cannot legally be violated by any law drafted by any state or by the federal legislature short of a Constitutional amendment.
Further, those amendments do not occur "on a whim," they require the legislature to propose an amendment which must be ratified by 75% of all state legislatures before it becomes law. The executive isn't involved.
Redfingers 2 months ago
@Redfingers (cont.) If you give me a gun without keeping track of it and then also allow me unlimited access to an untrackable, anonymous source of ammunition how do you or anybody else knows what I'm going to do with it? I could use it to keep a group of slaves chained up in a factory under the threat of death and continuously working to supply me with cheap products to sell for profit for all you know.
technatezin 2 months ago
@technatezin
Here's what's wrong with what you just said.
If I was unable to track your gun and your ammunition, that would imply that you could have purchased it illegally.
If you were keeping a group of slaves, that would be illegal. If you were planning on doing something illegal with the gun anyway, how would making guns illegal stop the problem?
Redfingers 2 months ago
Allonya looks amazing today
RapedByRepublicans 2 months ago
@RapedByRepublicans your implying unintentionally i think that she didn't look amazing on the last show she did.
bunkmasterflex 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAlyonaShow
@MrViTopol ...2-Motha-Fuckin'-TRILL, my nigg...
Y0UT00B3R1 2 months ago
That's funny, 'cause Riggs makes me want to throw-up..."...east of the river..."...nigga, please...what a fat-stupid-fuck...and Lulz...ain't no way these stupid fucks at RT was catchin' that Whitaker slip-up...that Ammo ad was as wackly low-budget as ALL of RTДмзя1кд's lamely produced BULLshit-ass "ads"...right down to the shitty metal soundtrack.
Y0UT00B3R1 2 months ago
Female Ferrari owners club joke => WIN! :D
If he had included an offhand remark about making sandwiches it would have been epic win :)
gulllars 2 months ago
Fuck Israel it must be destroyed
maju786 2 months ago
The American people should fear the corrupted government,When Politicians pass a Law/Bill like S-1867 that will put the Military on the street,Highways and Roads of America. It's best to be armed then unarmed. Many will think before doing this unconstitutional act of shooting a Armed American Citizen. When the prey can shoot back and they can be killed,it makes a big different.There are 150 Million Gun Owners in American.This is why they want to get rid of the 2nd Amend in The Constitution!.
darkwitch5252 2 months ago 3
Most countries in Europe have gun control and we don't see genocides. You know what we also don't see as often? Random killing sprees. Something we see in the US way too often.
LtShock 2 months ago
Who the heck wants to live on a planet without computers, cell phones, 7-11's, and sexy russian news reporters?
007HubbaBubba 2 months ago
You got the title of the video wrong. It should indicate the content.
KatharinaF1 2 months ago
riggs,blake,hansen.the happy hour shmuck of the day.alyona,i really need an explanation.why dude?they are not smart.they are not cool.they are terrible dressers (a purple striped shirt with a purple polka-dot tie?really,man?that's the best you can do?)at least jimbo made an effort with the grey jacket last week.are these churchill's boyfriends?just give us more tanya and kristine.please.
dobbsiancant 2 months ago
Sigh....guns to defend themselves against govt. How cheesy is that? the goddamn police show up with enough firearms and gear to knock down an army just to a goddamn police protest. If they show up and your house and try to take you, they can do it, and if you fight back they merely apply more force and charge you more heavily. Living in a dangerous neighborhood sure, but against improsonment and so forth? Bullshit.
shkotay 2 months ago
Melancholia?
nitrorev386 2 months ago
Typical rich lamborgini-owning a-holes. They'd rather break their toys when they're bored with them then give them to me. And everyone else.
trajan74 2 months ago
Priceless, How quickly Alyona steers the topic from Fast and Furious Gunwalking.
So much for covering bold and daring stories no one else dares to touch.
No Mercy.
sirfith 2 months ago
Really disappointing RT!!!!
You even missed the most ridiculous part about the ammo-ad: Left to Obama, that's FOREST WHITAKER (!) who played Idi Amin (a real dictator from Uganda) in "The Last King of Scottland"!
N0ATUN 2 months ago
@N0ATUN RT is clueless
MrViTopol 2 months ago