@Sfoilgirl03 My only point is that pretty much all animators do it, that I know of, and even movies use the same stock footage. Making a video takes time, a lot of time, taking shortcuts that don't effect the quality is great, especially when you're a little kid waiting for such films.
Also, this was during the dark time of animation. Feature films had a terrible time trying to make a profit, and Disney was the only animation company that made it through. Reusing animation to keep the costs down was one of the ways they managed to survive.
I make animations Using paint (not good ones) and i hate making frames, so, and so does disney probally as PinkOnBlace, it's just saving time and money, there not lazy, you try making an hour and a half movie, drawing over 1000 frames, i dont blame them for re-using..so, yep
I remember noticing the similarities in the Jungle Book/Sword of The Stone movements (the trip scene, and the swinging the weapons), and the dance that both Duchess from Aristocrats and Marian from Robin Hood did, but I wasn't aware of the others. O_O Whoa!
Disney was not lazy. The redo-ing of scenes was because of budget constraints, even though it barely saved any time or money and in the long run takes more effort. The major pass for reusing a scene I'll give is for Kaa when he slithers away with his coils all tangled. Many people do not realize how complicated that whole slither is to animate. It probably took weeks to plan that out correctly.
still they rerelease the lion king (which is a good movie) gets releleased WITH NO CHANGES TO IT is pretty darn lazy. i dont have any probs with the movie but disney is clearly willing to whore out anything for money.
how is that lazy? it's smart and a time saver. even if they use the same outline or whatever for the people, they still have to draw the background and everything else. that is FAR from lazy.
back when most of these were created animation costs were exspensive and involved so studios often reused animations and scenery. Thats how we got the scrolling backgrounds of the flintstones. We take big box office animated things for granted now a days.
I don't see anything wrong with reusing animation, the movies are for children not for people to pick apart. They help build character and morals in children, didn't you watch any as a child? Leave Disney alone already!
i wish people would shut up a) about Disney being lazy and b) Disney is stupid and all that other mean stuff about Disney. I still watch Disney films, so? They are not lazy, just saving money - God!
Like so many people have said, it isn't lazy, Walt Disney went through a financial difficulty and had to reinvernt old footage, plus the fact that Robin Hood was the last movie that was made with him alive, he died b4 it was finished, so yh
@NinjaStarfish94 Walt was long dead by that time. The Jungle Book was finished after his death, and The Aristocats was the first film to be made without him overseeing it (hence the beginning of the 22-year Disney slump.)
Animation takes a lot of time to do right and it is expensive. You say they are lazy, well screw you. The Disney animators put their hearts and souls into their creations and they deserve more respect than that.
Lots of these movies were in the period right before the Disney renissance, when they had a tight budget. Of course the best option was to cut costs and reuse things! And besides, they did such a good job that it's not noticable to those who aren't TRYING to find something to bash.
All who are quick to bash Disney for reusing animation are ignorant. A few seconds of animation are the product of days of work. The old process (before computers came into play in The Great Mouse Detective) was much more time-consuming than modern animation. Yet the convenience of computer animation has replaced the painstaking process of hand-drawn animation, giving testament to the true talent and exquisiteness of classic animation, which, because of its difficulty, has yet to be emulated.
Do you realize how much time and money Disney had to use to draw every single frame in their movies? I'm sure everyone on the team looked for opportunities to reuse things, which even then had to be reworked.
tell you what, considering the the time frame between some of these movies if you was alive when the first animated Disney film was made or released until now. I watched every single one and if you never realized that some of the scenes where reused in the different features then I'd say that Disney did a pretty good job.
i completly agree with mc1186, i think considering the work that went into these animations and the fact that 95% of people dont know that some scenes have been reused, its not lazy at all... disney is for kids not for fussy people ready to call them uncreative and lazy.. and i dont hear the kids complaining... i actually find it interesting to learn that they did this, and i think it was a good idea...
they are not lazy ... animation is one of the hardest thing to make in the world...btw even he used to same sequence ...he had to redraw all the frames again anyway.... how the fuck is that lazy?!!
wow your so wrong, theyve only had one original idea that theyve applied to 3+ movies and havent changed it a bit how isnt that lazy or uncreative think before you say shit like that again
no, im not, they had more then one.......the adventures of Ichabod Crane Mr Toad and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs are two different movies......I happen to know alot on this subject matter......its not lazy.......the movies that have reused sequences are from the late 60's and 70's when the animated features were losing money and after Walt Disney passed away....
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is from 1937 and The Adventures of Ichabod Crane Mr Toad is from 1949.....big gap between using footage.......I do think before I say this....I happen to know alot about this subject matter...only thing I really take pride in
Actually, no, I'm just talking about Historical facts. Wolfgang Reitherman, one of the 9 Old Men, DID worked these into the films. Time CGI can be crapped out ( not saying Pixar movies are not awesome, THEY ARE, the story is what makes those movie amazing.) the animation is awesome because of the ability to make it very realistic....
BUT it is missing the art form that is 2D animation, the personality put into each and every character, and the artistic talent of the layout is something you just don't get within CGI. .......to say that These American Artists are Lazy is an Insult to their amazing legacy....beloved animated classics...whether it be CGI or traditional 2D animation would not exist with out the great advancements that these Artistic genius' Pioneered
As others have said, I don't blame Disney for reusing animation owing to low budget and all, but I still love comparing these things :P Amazing that there can be so many repeats
that animation was very expensive and time consuming. giving animated bits to clean up artists to change the character models of previously animated scenes kept them from going bankrupt. It wasn't lazy, just smart.
So does this mean there's a sequel called Anime: Lazy Japanese?
Sfoilgirl03 2 weeks ago
@Sfoilgirl03 My only point is that pretty much all animators do it, that I know of, and even movies use the same stock footage. Making a video takes time, a lot of time, taking shortcuts that don't effect the quality is great, especially when you're a little kid waiting for such films.
Sfoilgirl03 2 weeks ago
i dont knoe why but that chipmunks song is fucking catchy! haha ima bump it my car like thug lmao
Strivenigga 1 month ago
Also, this was during the dark time of animation. Feature films had a terrible time trying to make a profit, and Disney was the only animation company that made it through. Reusing animation to keep the costs down was one of the ways they managed to survive.
Defenstrator 1 month ago
I make animations Using paint (not good ones) and i hate making frames, so, and so does disney probally as PinkOnBlace, it's just saving time and money, there not lazy, you try making an hour and a half movie, drawing over 1000 frames, i dont blame them for re-using..so, yep
123PurpleCorn 1 month ago
I remember noticing the similarities in the Jungle Book/Sword of The Stone movements (the trip scene, and the swinging the weapons), and the dance that both Duchess from Aristocrats and Marian from Robin Hood did, but I wasn't aware of the others. O_O Whoa!
EllenRebecca3 2 months ago
Have you ever made an animation? If not, you might not know how time consuming it it. It also saves lots of money to reuse animations.
LittleBulleteye 2 months ago
@supersmashbros596 thats the whole point. They didnt mean to CHANGE the movie! Just made it in 3D experience! -.- drink some milk.
LetsStopThisSong 4 months ago
You're the lazy ones! With your computers, GSM, telephones, wireless internet, Ipods, E-mail,....
That's lazy! We're all lazy!
waterproofXmascara 5 months ago
Disney was not lazy. The redo-ing of scenes was because of budget constraints, even though it barely saved any time or money and in the long run takes more effort. The major pass for reusing a scene I'll give is for Kaa when he slithers away with his coils all tangled. Many people do not realize how complicated that whole slither is to animate. It probably took weeks to plan that out correctly.
1947Desoto 6 months ago
still they rerelease the lion king (which is a good movie) gets releleased WITH NO CHANGES TO IT is pretty darn lazy. i dont have any probs with the movie but disney is clearly willing to whore out anything for money.
supersmashbro596 6 months ago
HA! thumbs up if you agree the end is the BEST part!
amore004 6 months ago
its for kids, would you have noticed as a kid??
matthewjamal 7 months ago
how is that lazy? it's smart and a time saver. even if they use the same outline or whatever for the people, they still have to draw the background and everything else. that is FAR from lazy.
crushcrushfaint90 8 months ago
If this was just called "Disney Frames Re-Used", it would have been totally cool.
GnarlyPoundage 8 months ago
Lazy??? No, it's more like you're stupid.
RapIsDeadly 8 months ago
and nothing of value was lost. no seriously no one noticed! my favorite movie is robin hood and even i admit it was all cut and paste.
Montork 10 months ago
back when most of these were created animation costs were exspensive and involved so studios often reused animations and scenery. Thats how we got the scrolling backgrounds of the flintstones. We take big box office animated things for granted now a days.
ViralFate 10 months ago
I don't see anything wrong with reusing animation, the movies are for children not for people to pick apart. They help build character and morals in children, didn't you watch any as a child? Leave Disney alone already!
No1snobunni 10 months ago
i wish people would shut up a) about Disney being lazy and b) Disney is stupid and all that other mean stuff about Disney. I still watch Disney films, so? They are not lazy, just saving money - God!
toffeepops9 11 months ago
I don't think Disney is being lazy but people should shut up claiming Japanese animators are bad when they have to work with a tight budget
Kellox17 11 months ago
i see the hand of the illuminati here. Bwahahahaha!
weequay35 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Make a note that when Robin Hood was in production Disney was having some big financial problems .
classicstarr 1 year ago
Like so many people have said, it isn't lazy, Walt Disney went through a financial difficulty and had to reinvernt old footage, plus the fact that Robin Hood was the last movie that was made with him alive, he died b4 it was finished, so yh
NinjaStarfish94 1 year ago
@NinjaStarfish94 Walt was long dead by that time. The Jungle Book was finished after his death, and The Aristocats was the first film to be made without him overseeing it (hence the beginning of the 22-year Disney slump.)
CaptainRaccoonWhitly 1 year ago
What a SHITTY song...
CarolineSkov 1 year ago
theres even more
SunnyAnimeGirl 1 year ago
Whoever realized this has WAY too much time on their hands.
BTuhTuhTizzle 1 year ago
You have too much time on your hands.
fancyfeetmoves 1 year ago
Animation takes a lot of time to do right and it is expensive. You say they are lazy, well screw you. The Disney animators put their hearts and souls into their creations and they deserve more respect than that.
bigjonnymac43 1 year ago 4
DEE DEE DEE YOU CAN'T SAY THAT CARLOS
FourthDerivative 1 year ago
THEY DID THAT ON PURPOSE, you idiots.
livingfree15 1 year ago 2
Fuck Disney
Fmaack 1 year ago
that is too funny
musicJ3SS 1 year ago
this is awesome. Ive been noticing this myself, but it doesnt mean i hate dinsney.
vargmo 1 year ago
if you think disney is lazy, then YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW LAZY other cartoon making companies are lazy. the re use like a motherfucker
phattown213 1 year ago 2
Lots of these movies were in the period right before the Disney renissance, when they had a tight budget. Of course the best option was to cut costs and reuse things! And besides, they did such a good job that it's not noticable to those who aren't TRYING to find something to bash.
simzproductionz 1 year ago 5
You know hand-drawn animations is harder than any animation to make so Disney isn't lazy, just genius...
CreativeBox1994 1 year ago
All who are quick to bash Disney for reusing animation are ignorant. A few seconds of animation are the product of days of work. The old process (before computers came into play in The Great Mouse Detective) was much more time-consuming than modern animation. Yet the convenience of computer animation has replaced the painstaking process of hand-drawn animation, giving testament to the true talent and exquisiteness of classic animation, which, because of its difficulty, has yet to be emulated.
jedi4Iife 1 year ago 3
hahahahaha
NarutoAholic 1 year ago
Do you realize how much time and money Disney had to use to draw every single frame in their movies? I'm sure everyone on the team looked for opportunities to reuse things, which even then had to be reworked.
TheGrimSmile 1 year ago
XD thats disney for ya
12gonzales 1 year ago
tell you what, considering the the time frame between some of these movies if you was alive when the first animated Disney film was made or released until now. I watched every single one and if you never realized that some of the scenes where reused in the different features then I'd say that Disney did a pretty good job.
Trekkie982 1 year ago 4
same as avater... it is just pocohontas etc remade
who cares
TezzaPKS 1 year ago
i completly agree with mc1186, i think considering the work that went into these animations and the fact that 95% of people dont know that some scenes have been reused, its not lazy at all... disney is for kids not for fussy people ready to call them uncreative and lazy.. and i dont hear the kids complaining... i actually find it interesting to learn that they did this, and i think it was a good idea...
XxThankForTheVenomXx 2 years ago 7
This isn't lazy. It's genius, and saved loads of work and money, without causing any problems except for to those who want to see problems.
Bravo to disney!
PinkOnBlack 2 years ago 90
@PinkOnBlack The problem is that a "new" movies are coming out with half-assed animation.
yarow122 1 year ago
You only notice this kind of stuff if you're really looking for it. A testament to the artists skills.
Ultrasecond 2 years ago 6
if you knew actually how much work this takes to make u wouldnt be saying shit about it
Marianaisabelvill 2 years ago 5
haha i think its cool. clearly a sensative subject to some people :P
KerryMulgrewYaah 2 years ago 2
they are not lazy ... animation is one of the hardest thing to make in the world...btw even he used to same sequence ...he had to redraw all the frames again anyway.... how the fuck is that lazy?!!
skijophreniC 2 years ago 64
Yeah, but some hole clips (atleast 10 minutes) are the same exact animation. It's just like the same film with different charectors.
Elliottslingsby 2 years ago 2
wow your so wrong, theyve only had one original idea that theyve applied to 3+ movies and havent changed it a bit how isnt that lazy or uncreative think before you say shit like that again
bigticketub 2 years ago
no, im not, they had more then one.......the adventures of Ichabod Crane Mr Toad and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs are two different movies......I happen to know alot on this subject matter......its not lazy.......the movies that have reused sequences are from the late 60's and 70's when the animated features were losing money and after Walt Disney passed away....
mc1186 2 years ago
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is from 1937 and The Adventures of Ichabod Crane Mr Toad is from 1949.....big gap between using footage.......I do think before I say this....I happen to know alot about this subject matter...only thing I really take pride in
mc1186 2 years ago
1. Do you realize the amount of effort that went into each hand drawn film.
2. Whats wrong with readapting footage that worked so well? Idea's don't have to die and can be applied to many different things
3. films today should rightfully be called lazy;CGI, as cool as it is, does not take as much effort as traditional 2d animation
so, do your research before you go bashing works of art.
mc1186 2 years ago
So, you're the CEO who approved these animation repeats at Disney? Cost cutting was it? CGI takes as much if not more effort to create as 2D.
mortigasiii 2 years ago
Actually, no, I'm just talking about Historical facts. Wolfgang Reitherman, one of the 9 Old Men, DID worked these into the films. Time CGI can be crapped out ( not saying Pixar movies are not awesome, THEY ARE, the story is what makes those movie amazing.) the animation is awesome because of the ability to make it very realistic....
mc1186 2 years ago
Comment removed
mc1186 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BUT it is missing the art form that is 2D animation, the personality put into each and every character, and the artistic talent of the layout is something you just don't get within CGI. .......to say that These American Artists are Lazy is an Insult to their amazing legacy....beloved animated classics...whether it be CGI or traditional 2D animation would not exist with out the great advancements that these Artistic genius' Pioneered
mc1186 2 years ago
yeah, it was actually one animator who always pushed reusing animation, his name was Wolfgang Reitherman, he was one of Disney's Nine Old Men.
mc1186 2 years ago
Hee-hee!
As others have said, I don't blame Disney for reusing animation owing to low budget and all, but I still love comparing these things :P Amazing that there can be so many repeats
LilbunUWiz 3 years ago
The films that reused animation are primarily from the same era, when Disney animation had no money.
GreatestMovieEverMad 3 years ago
just HAD to throw carlos mencia in there huh? lol
doseiaisha 3 years ago
that animation was very expensive and time consuming. giving animated bits to clean up artists to change the character models of previously animated scenes kept them from going bankrupt. It wasn't lazy, just smart.
CorndogMaker 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dude!
thats crap and you know it! you can be as smart as you want but that doesn't mean your not still being a lazy asshole!
guiltybystander77 4 years ago
how many feature films have you animated?
or is that not in your job description at mcdonalds
Adam9724 4 years ago 3
Nice editing with this.
Astera 4 years ago
YES THANK GOD SOMEONE FINALLY SAW THE FREAKIN JOKE THEIF!!!! adding this to favorites!!
CocoMunky 4 years ago
lol thts awesome
alexpalmer368 4 years ago