Chad Larose Canes goal disallowed with 2 secs left in 2nd period of Game 2!

[x30xSabresFan]

What people arent putting into their thought is this, The camera is at an angle, however slight, it makes a difference. the ref on the ice didnt see it go in, so he said no goal. But that angle puts the puck accualy in the net, when its not.

Its an illusion and the guys in Toronto know it

[AngryRussian47]

BULL SHITT CALL

[denelson83]

You know what should ultimately be used to decide close calls like that?

3-D Radar.

[breakoutrulz]

what if... the war room wasnt run by a bunch of high school dropouts... what if

[chuckels34]

This is not a goal because the puck was on its side but it was on the eage of the puck. Look at the high angle shot again. It looks like it is but the puck in still on the line. The puck is on the eage of the red line if you look at it there is no ice between the puck and the line. They say it is in but all the see is the net. Also it is inconclusive because the net is in the way and you can't get a closer zoom in on the puck like video games.

[avsfan331940]

There has to be a better way of being sure that the puck is all the way in.

We thought video replay was the answer, but most replays end up being declared "inconclusive" and therefore useless.

[Bulldogs119]

Beauty goal!! Bar down all day.

[caniac85]

ur right it was in my parents were mad when they called it no goal. sub me pls.

[POPNDOUGH]

This is annoying as hell. Is there any way to post a link to a pic in these comments?

[x30xSabresFan]

@POPNDOUGH heres the link to this vid /watch?v=0ljCJuHPRaU&feature=r­elated

just dont put in Youtube.com and copy/paste the rest

people know what to do if they see it

[Bulldogs119]

That was a sick snipe.

Clearly over the line.

It's almost as though they WANT Boston to win it this year.

[Canez919]

Thats a goal. the puck was across the line and u could c some of the white on the other side.

[yankeessuck4546]

r u kiddin me tim thomas is over rated r u kiddin me dude how old r u 13. eric stall cant do shit against the bruins all hes done is score on an empty net goal which he was goal hangin chara fuckin sticks 2 him like glue in the 6 games they played all year he had 1 cheap goal and a plus minues of -6 that means he cant do shit against good D and the bruins win in 5 and 2 all the haters dont blame the refs blame the ppl in toranto cause they make all the calls

[mcf256]

No he is not kidding dude. I think game 3 answered all your questions.

[yankeessuck4546]

no i did not anwser anyhtin cause game 3 was a cheap game for both teams all the goals that were scored were all cheap goals lucic goal wasnt great the puck was in his skates and then banged it in eric stall's goal was a gift the puck was fanned on by a bruins defensman and stall was there to capitalize sammys goal thomas should of saved it recci's goal was a joke and jokien was another bruins collapse he was there and he got enough on it 2 bang it in. but we will c game 4 if the bruins show up

[WonkotheSane42042]

who's going to win... a hurricane or a fucking bear?... what's the bear gonna do... growl at the storm? hahaha BIG Z fucking blows... Staal and Whitney FTW... tim thomas is overrated... Tuuka Rask 0.00 GAA on the season... playing goal in boston is easy

[seanpwns04]

I beilive Boston might lose to the Canes, But then again there only down 2-1, It's not over till its over. Also Chara is so better than Staal, Whitney sucks, And Thomas is amazing how can a Goalie be overrated, He eitheir sucks or he's good, and hes good

[Snapscape]

I don't see why they don't design the nets so that the crossbar can act as the goal line for shots like this? Instead they have netting obscuring the goal line. NHL morons. Don't these people learn anything? How long did it take them to remove the protruding bottom point? After Mark Howe was impaled with the damn thing! So much for HD replays.

[go4a24]

That puck was very close, all of the angles I was shown on TV couldn't prove it was over. I know it was in now but that is only after some extra work was done on the pic, zoomed and cleaned

[Bluelectron]

You would think in this age of modern technology they could come up with a better way of confirming goals, wonder how many "pops" the boys in the HQ booth consumed that night!!

[nevmiles]

The refs don't make the call - people reviewing it in Toronto do . . . so get mad at them, not the refs

[mcf256]

The real reason that goal was not allowed is that if they did allow it, more than half the veiwers would have changed the channel and the ratings would have gone down the toilet. The NHL is big business. Keeping the game close satisfies the sponsers who ultimately pay the bills. It was clearly a goal. Thankfully for the NHL front office it did not play into the outcome. Otherwise, the NHL joins the WWF.

[go4a24]

LOL oh no a conspiracy theorist.

[rockdCasbah]

He shoots! He scores!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[habsstuff]

That was a goal, Thomas sucks so im not surprised.

[seanpwns04]

Is that why he only allowed 4 goals in the playoffs against your gay little habs.

[giffer44]

Wow must be a bunch of morons here in the comment section. Yes, it should have been a goal. I agree that it looked across and that they missed a tough call. However, it was the replay booth in Toronto. The refs on the ice DO NOT make that call. All goals, especially in the playoffs, are reviewed by NHL HQ.

[NCspecV]

what can you expect? it was the home town booth. Regardless, it was got back.

[lauralongcollins]

Yeah look at 1:25. 100% of the puck is over the line. Thanks for posting this video clip.

[POPNDOUGH]

No it's not. The white you see is the net mesh.

Good call.

Even if it actually was in, there is no conclusive proof that it it was 100% in.

On the closeup, you can see at least 1/8th of an inch is still on the goal line.

[go4a24]

They showed a blown up pic of the puck clearly over the line, however very close and refs made the best call they could.

[POPNDOUGH]

I'd like to see that pic because I've seen blown up picks that show the puck is STILL on the goal line.

I've tried posting a link to the close up with a line drawn in to show where the goal line is, but it never works.

[go4a24]

I don't care one way or the other but there is a pic out there that shows it clearly was over, I wish I had it so I could send it to you but I don't. Like I said though, I'm not a Canes fan I'm a Leaf fan andn I don't care one way or the other

[KATIEx6677]

last time i checked the net wasnt on the ice.

[helbertnc]

The NHL's official stance is: the call on the ice was no goal, the video evidence was not conclusive.... I don't know how much more conclusive this evidence needs to be, from both angles it was clearly a goal. Missing this one on the ice in real time is understandable but if the TV announcers can get it right then you'd think the NHL could too. Fortunately, it didn't affect the outcome of the game.

[GoACanes87]

that was definitely a goal

[LarrySpolander]

I can't understand how can they disallow that one?? Amazing! Must be bunch of morons up there in the vid room!