@stonesteven90 Yup, i thought it would rev way higher. I have a truck w/a 383 w/4.10's w/35" tires and a 700r4 trans and i'm about 1700rpm at 60mph in over drive. My truck loves to run at 2500rpm and i'd think that V8 would too. Almost hard to believe that's the result of 4.10's w/little tire's.
@FixFalcon That was back in 2006 when the OP uploaded this video originally... I just bought an 02' GT Vert 5spd with only 50k miles just a few weeks ago!
I got 4.10s in my '02 and they are good for everything up to autobahn speeds... check out my drive to work video. the only way i'd change them out is if i was pushing more power and needed more top end. they are the funnest mod i've done, next to a short throw shifter.
i have a 01 GT with just the 3.55's and a AOD tranny. got it right before the weather got bad so ill get to play with it come spring time. has all the goodies, making 420rwhp and owner before gave us time slips, 11.1's. put a 4.10 in it and ill be in the 10's =)
I got 4.30's and their fine on the highway. 70mph at 2800 rpm..... you dont even need to do like 75 its pointless. you dont gain much time at all lol.
hi, i have a question for all you stang lovers. i had the 94 5.0 before i sold it and it was bad as hell. im about to get a 92 5.0 fox body with 4.10 gears and its a 5 speed. The only other mods it has is 18s staggered 9 in front and 10 in rear and MSD wires and cap/rotor, and it has shorty headers with flowmaster exhaust. what am i getting? what will be my hp and tq and what will the acceleration be like? and if you have a video closely related itd be great.
Ive got a question for ya,ive just got my mustang supercharged,and it's an auto,with stock 331,what gear ratio would you reccommened for everyday driving,3.55 or 3.73 ?? thanks.
@FordsBetter516 i have a 01 mustang gt automatic, should i go with 3.73 or 4.10 gears? i already have the diablo sport tuner and modified intake and exhaust. does make a good difference in taking off when flooring the gas pedal? thanks
@GMurphSC06GT I've heard that if you have an auto go with 4.10's. But out of those two, i would go 3.73. I would either put 3.73 or 4.10's on anything. Nothing lower or higher
the temp is fine. mine runs at this and i have a after market thermostat and it reley dosent mater you might gain 1 hp from going to a colder thermostat if that a 1/2 hp maby and you dont want a to cool engion calls you need a little heat it burns off crap in your engion
To everyone who says you need a colder thermostat this is bad if you go too cold. In your engine the pistons when COLD are not perfectly round. When at proper operating temp your pistons are nice and round your. Oil is at the correct viscosity.
wouldnt run a 160 on a NA engine, thats overcooling which will damage the engine. That heat is good for burning off the soot that accumulates in the oil.
Have used it for 3 years with royal purple oil and filter...never 1 issue and still get 20mpg.. Trust me,it makes a huge difference in the summer...your comment is incorrect
that logic is akin to saying "smoking doesnt kill you instantly, so it must be good for you" in the end its your car, but I'd seek some info if I were you.
dude, u don't even need to be social to know this song, it's in guitar hero 3. u could buy the game and sit at your house all day and still know the song.
no doubt i have a 96gt with a 04 alum block ported heads,cams u name it its got it 7lb of boost i made 481 rwh... and have the dyno on here to prove it..
Actually the 4.6 SOHC is a pretty good engine. Very responsive to mods and very reliable. Thats why fleet cars (cops and cabbies) use them. Just because you don't like Ford doesn't mean you should give out false information. And I own a Camaro.
Actually the SOHC 4.6 is crap, ive seen a full bolt-on GT lose to a stock ls1, You wanna see a engine that respnds good to mods LS1, and i have a mustang, if you have a mustang and wanna hang with the big boys you need a DOHC 4.6.
you are right 4.6 does not respond to mods that well... i have a 98 mustang gt (pi swap, CAI, throttle body, tune, exhaust, tko500 tranny, sport clutch, etc. and it makes 260 to the wheels :( But i gotta admit it is hella quick. And how much does the stock ls1 makes whp even in auto model?
I think i will buy one of those, even if i find an auto... BTW today, one guy was saying that his stock ws6 A4 put down 311rwhp bone stock... Seems too good to be true lol
lol, i just bought a 02 t/a with the 6 speed bone stock. I havent driven it that much since i bought it because it needs to be insured... it does not seem as fast as some people claim it is...
If you are talking about a 99-04 mustang gt then it is normal for cars. Its "crank" hp is 260 but at the wheels it puts out 210- although i am not sure why yours puts out 210. Most that year gt's put 230 Wheel Hp bone stock.
what the hell are u talking about...do u even own one....i have an 02gt and it responded very well to the bolt-ons...u dont know shit...with just headers you can get 10rwhp or more since the stock exhaust manifolds are so restrictive...not to mention the intake manifold ,throttle body, and plenum which are to damn small stock..the heads are really restrictive...you dont know shit...i might have a factory freak 4.6 but with full bolt ons,gears, and a tune im putting down 312rwhp..
Yes, I own a 505hp GT with none of those stupid little bolt-ons. Heads are not considered "bolt ons." You are mistaken about headers. Most aftermarket headers on an N/A PI 4.6l cause you to lose torque and in many cases, LOSE hp. Also, please do not "add" gains. I doubt your "312" number is dyno proven.
headers do add hp if done with the proper mods...i never said heads were bolt-ons..backpressure is a bitch and is needed in different ways if stock....you loose Torque not hp though...like i said i might have a factory freak...ive seen 2 other gt's do the same and when they installed a comp xe262ah cam they put down 335whp...my 72 mach is pushing 650whp and im a certified ford tech. so i know a bit about stangs since i put the mach together and the gt also..when im done it should be at 600+whp
that kids an idiot man... your absolutly right and I called his bluff on his so-called 505hp stang WITHOUT bolt-ons... it's impossible on a fuel injected to realize those kind of numbers without all the supporting hardware/equipment... those being the bolt-ons.
your an idiot dude... without all those "stupid little bolt-ons" (intakes upper/lower, Throttle body, MAF sensor, CAI, full exhaust, heads, injectors, fuel pump, etc, etc i would love to know how you managed 505hp to the wheels or at the crank. Show us a video of your car mr 19 yr old genious... not the 8sec vid you have up or the "project 2008" you have up with someone else's name at the begining.
i think he has a supercharged gt, maybe kenne bell. Even so with only a kenne bell and no suporting mods, 2V gts only put down about 370whp on avg. That guy is a dumbass, he doesnt even have that at the crank, and thats if that car is even his....lol....I forgot to clown him on that before..
Actually, I never had 505hp with the "stupid little bolt-ons." I have an intercooled Kenne Bell 2.1l setup @ 9lbs and a Nitrous Express wet system running at 30 for a chemical intercooler. On top of that, I have the Kenne Bell big tube inlet kit which includes the 90mm MAFM and 75mm TB and various other modifications. Please do more research before running your mouth and making yourself look like a dumbass. The 2008 Project video is old.
what the fuck do you think a MAF, TB, and inlet tube is you fuckin duche? there called "bolt ons". And for your lame fucking comment on my video... your an idiot. I have 3 Mustangs and I happen to like how my 95 looks and at least i have a car and a video of it. You bash my shit and other peoples shit and you have nothing. Go suck a dick ya whinny little cocksucker. No one cares about you and your stupid fucking comments. Your just another little youtube bitch that thinks he knows everything.
You, sir, are a hypocrite. I really couldn't care less what you say. At the end of the day, my "nothing" has 200hp more than yours, and it gets it at a lower rpm. Oh, and I drive my "nothing" every single day.
You can fool yourself into thinking you're proving a point, but all you're doing is making yourself out to be an ass.
As I told you in that message, you're the reason why the stereotype exists.
There are numerous dyno sheets all around that show 4.6 and 5.4 NPI and PI engines with long tubes that gain 30+hp and 35+tq, if you think headers are useless and cause loss of torque you are WRONG. And bolt on's are anything that don't require custom fabrication, the supercharger bolted on, the heads bolted on, is it a stick on car?? That shit had to bolt-on, and I want to see this 505 RWHP 2v GT with 9 lbs, the stock cobra, with 4v heads that flow as good stock as any full port and polish 2v..
Don't trust all that you read on the internet. If you'd like to really prove me wrong, invest 1000$ in some headers and dyno your car. You'll lose torque. Trust me.
Also, you're right about the whole "bolt-on" thing. By "bolt-ons" I mean those stupid little 50-200$ modifications that claim 20hp. Those are worth shit unless you're using FI.
If you believe that better cylinder scavenging, lower EGT, and reduced backpressure cause a loss of power, you are an IDIOT! I have done dyno tests, worked on race engines for Roush/Yates and Petty Enterprises, headers are ESSENTIAL. I can put $300 worth of headers on my Non-PI and gain 30+hp and 40tq, no problem. Check out the new K&N intake for the GT500, they advertise 53hp just from the intake, and it has been proven to produce 50+ hp to the tires! Bolt ons don't work, yea right! Try Again!
I should have said that you lose torque on a stock engine. Modified engines OF COURSE gain power. Sorry about that.
But then again, when my car was stock it lost ALL torque with the cutouts open. Wouldn't that have the least amount of backpressure?
I have seen numerous dyno sheets in which headers with larger diameter runners produce less torque than those with smaller diameter runners (and stock exhaust manifolds)
Still look into headers, maybe you are messing with shortys, I have never seen or heard of losing any torque with long tubes. And a engine requires some backpressure, you will loose torque with open manifolds or headers, and as for diameter. The tube diameter desired is dependant on horsepower and displacement(CID), bigger is not better EVER! Step tube headers will produce the most torque. If you lost torque with long tubes it was due to your lack of research and choice of headers!
Personally, I have never lost torque due to headers because I'm running the stock exhaust manifolds. Ford actually did a good job on mine. Also, I was generalizing the whole header argument around my 4.6l 2v engine. Most engines pick up a good amount of power with headers, but my engine (in general) loses torque if the headers are too large for the power output (like you said above).
Of course, FI applications warrant headers. I'm picking some up soon
I really don't thinks that's possible. 75mph@2600RPM = 180mph@6000 rpm, and with 3.73's close to 200mph@6000. My Z has a 4.08 and it tops at 160mph@7000. Unless it's an automatic tansmission, then this is possible.
he most likely is in his OD gear and i believe 4.10's run out at 120-130. the reason for this video i assume, was to see rpm's at highway speeds. any 4+ gears usually turn people away cause of this effecting gas mileage. i say go all the way with 4.30's
well i know my 02 redlined when it was stock at like 5800 the powerband was 3500-5500. 5th gear usually isnt used in racing unless they do put 3.90-4.30's in. damn low revving fords. thank god mine can now rev to 6700
Wow 6700rpm thats awesome, she must scream. Any videos? I think my stock redline is 6900 and its at 7200 now, but I want to build it to handle 8000+ someday :)
no videos.. im not tech savy.. but all my power is down low anyway cause i have a twin screw kenne bell... so it rarely sees redline. but since its an MMR block with forged internals.. i can spin that sucker.
sorry but wrong. 4.10s will take you to just north of 160 in 5th near redline. thats just my experience though. and for the guy asking about what the 5th gear is in a mustang, its .62
i love it when people spew nonsense... why would anyone race LONG ENOUGH to get to 5th gear... number 2.. if you need to get to 160 to see who won the race.. id say you probably lost.
i didnt do that in a race. i rarely race off the track. that was just a run to satisfy my curiosity as to how fast will it go with 4.10s, and it was done on a dead strip of insterstate.
you havent heard of a gear calculator?? and on the interstate? you havent heard of a pothole? hit a pothole at 160 and watch what happens. you should have went with 4.30's. and honestly i dont see a mustang hitting 160 without pieces flying off.
i believe you underestimate the quality of the mustang. they are actually very stable cars at high speed. just cuz you moms honda wont do it dont be jelous.
Two valves are slow!
McG33Productions 1 week ago
This is the most pointless video I have ever seen!!! 2 thumbs down
mvadinan540 3 weeks ago
@mvadinan540 its made to show where your rpm's would be if you were considering putting taller gears in a mustang. theres the point
muscletruckdude 1 week ago
im surprised you can still tach that low. How she feel when you get on it?
stonesteven90 1 month ago
@stonesteven90 Yup, i thought it would rev way higher. I have a truck w/a 383 w/4.10's w/35" tires and a 700r4 trans and i'm about 1700rpm at 60mph in over drive. My truck loves to run at 2500rpm and i'd think that V8 would too. Almost hard to believe that's the result of 4.10's w/little tire's.
hpjunky70 3 weeks ago
huh. i actually thought u would show us something impressive. not just you driving down the highway. my bad.
downrivermuscle 1 month ago
dam those rpm's are to high bro for going 75mph hows you mpg with those gears?
TeXas4Life956 2 months ago
did you get your speedo calibrated for the new gears?
askloglog 2 months ago
hence the higher rpms...... or else theyd be the same as stock
SHiFTQUiKR 1 month ago
It just looks a little low that gearing .. That's just my opinion thoe..
brandon65960 2 months ago
bro launch that beast
woodpusher9871 3 months ago
slow as fuck my sti wiill fuck eat this shit for breakfast
knobbzy11 4 months ago
@knobbzy11 i reallt dnt think he even was at half throtte
123ryancarter 3 months ago
@knobbzy11 ... says the 19 year old fag that wish he had a car.
beluga420 2 months ago
@beluga420 haha and this is coming from the pothead that cant save a pennie for his life hah fuck off dumbass
knobbzy11 2 months ago
@knobbzy11 wut do you know of my life asshole?nothing, so stfu
beluga420 2 months ago
@beluga420 exactly u dont know shit about me either, so shut ur damn mouth
knobbzy11 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@knobbzy11 Fuck off, loser.
Lowtryx 2 months ago
84 people drive hondas.
dylanmcown3d 4 months ago 6
@dylanmcown3d 84 people rape mustamgs with hondas
TomasPerez15 1 month ago
@TomasPerez15 84 mustang drivers didnt know how to drive.
dylanmcown3d 1 month ago
@dylanmcown3d lol correction...3 months later 91 now
NaguShiiaRen 1 month ago
wow those miles are adding up fast!
BHS201055 5 months ago
WAKE ME WHEN ITS OVER....gone in 60 days?
weldonzerom 6 months ago
@weldonzerom its not a speed run there buddy its showing how high the rpms are at highway speeds.
ZDoomCentral 5 months ago
Only 45K miles on an '02 very nice.
.
FixFalcon 9 months ago
@FixFalcon That was back in 2006 when the OP uploaded this video originally... I just bought an 02' GT Vert 5spd with only 50k miles just a few weeks ago!
DJSlurp1200 5 months ago
@FixFalcon My 95 gt only has 32k :b
blazingraptors01 4 months ago
Drivin' a stang and listening to metallica, is there something better?
SaleenSterlingS302 9 months ago
@SaleenSterlingS302 Yea...swap the Metallica out for some Slayer.
ownTer 8 months ago
I got 4.10s in my '02 and they are good for everything up to autobahn speeds... check out my drive to work video. the only way i'd change them out is if i was pushing more power and needed more top end. they are the funnest mod i've done, next to a short throw shifter.
tonytufnutz 10 months ago
i love/hate my 4.10s. suck at the highway as you can see haha. but love them off the line
dacribgansta 10 months ago
i have a 05 mustang gt manual with a.e.m intake complete exhaust, but i do not know what gears to put in what do u recommend is 4,10 o.k?
chakiya1001 11 months ago
i have a 05 mustang gt manual with aem intake complete exhaust, but i dont kno what gears to put in what do u recomend is 4,10 ok?
chakiya1001 11 months ago
@chakiya1001 Go with the 3:73's....I'm running 4:10's in my Cobra and they're just a little too steep, especially for the highway.
A lot of fun around town, but 1st gear is useless.
41elliott 10 months ago
justice is lost justice is raped justice is done
knuckleballer187 1 year ago
does it putting 4:10 gears on a 01 mustang gt automatic makes a big difference on torque?
ws3133 1 year ago
what a waste of money/gas! 4.10 gears are so stupid
Rudigity 1 year ago
Fuck yeah, Metallica!!!! there's something about a car in this video?
jbrown198323 1 year ago
i have a 01 GT with just the 3.55's and a AOD tranny. got it right before the weather got bad so ill get to play with it come spring time. has all the goodies, making 420rwhp and owner before gave us time slips, 11.1's. put a 4.10 in it and ill be in the 10's =)
airsoftg0d 1 year ago
@airsoftg0d and whats all the "goodies" include
00infernoGT 1 year ago
I got 4.30's and their fine on the highway. 70mph at 2800 rpm..... you dont even need to do like 75 its pointless. you dont gain much time at all lol.
p4ndiamond 1 year ago
Wow very quick acceleration
Amirnake 1 year ago 2
This car just got faster with the metallica playing
SpdDemon69 1 year ago 16
lovin the metallica!
jcthemack 1 year ago
hmmm... im running the EXACT same rpm's as you but my 99 gt supposedly has 3.73's, and i have the receipt too. interesting
speeddemon0712 1 year ago
metallica!
lilnicksonn 1 year ago
That's what i hated about my 4.10 s. Not good for highway use
deepdint 1 year ago
hey i got a supercharge 5.0 and im wondering should i do 373's or 410's? how bad are 410's on the interstate?
MrTcook93 1 year ago
@MrTcook93 373's you'll do nothing but spin on 410's and a blower, still fun.
mgrande11 1 year ago
Is the car tuned with the governor turned off ?
texasfoci 1 year ago
hi, i have a question for all you stang lovers. i had the 94 5.0 before i sold it and it was bad as hell. im about to get a 92 5.0 fox body with 4.10 gears and its a 5 speed. The only other mods it has is 18s staggered 9 in front and 10 in rear and MSD wires and cap/rotor, and it has shorty headers with flowmaster exhaust. what am i getting? what will be my hp and tq and what will the acceleration be like? and if you have a video closely related itd be great.
shadyblitz92 1 year ago
OH YEI METALLICA
RicardoAlves1990 1 year ago
what exactly is 4.10s? i know when im going 65 on the city streets im somewhere around 1800rpm
Xellos357 1 year ago
@Xellos357 its the rearend gear ratio.
FordsBetter516 1 year ago
@Xellos357 Souns like you hace 2.72, maybe even higher.
408Mustangs 1 year ago
Ive got a question for ya,ive just got my mustang supercharged,and it's an auto,with stock 331,what gear ratio would you reccommened for everyday driving,3.55 or 3.73 ?? thanks.
GMurphSC06GT 1 year ago
@GMurphSC06GT go 3.73. it will be a lot quicker because its an auto
FordsBetter516 1 year ago
@FordsBetter516 i have a 01 mustang gt automatic, should i go with 3.73 or 4.10 gears? i already have the diablo sport tuner and modified intake and exhaust. does make a good difference in taking off when flooring the gas pedal? thanks
ws3133 1 year ago
@ws3133 get 4.10s, since you have an auto. Yes it will blow your mind how much faster it takes off from 0-100.
FordsBetter516 1 year ago
@GMurphSC06GT I've heard that if you have an auto go with 4.10's. But out of those two, i would go 3.73. I would either put 3.73 or 4.10's on anything. Nothing lower or higher
oVoLaTiLex 1 year ago
I have 4.30's and 70mph I'm doing 3,000 rpms. I love the high gears.
INFERREDD 1 year ago
nice to see you can still get some decent mileage with a 4.10 =p
KtfoMustang 1 year ago
the temp is fine. mine runs at this and i have a after market thermostat and it reley dosent mater you might gain 1 hp from going to a colder thermostat if that a 1/2 hp maby and you dont want a to cool engion calls you need a little heat it burns off crap in your engion
lawnmaster111 1 year ago
One by Metallica
hell yeah!
aman2live4 1 year ago
Metallica!!!!! Yeahhh!!!!!!
tamaninja00 1 year ago
To everyone who says you need a colder thermostat this is bad if you go too cold. In your engine the pistons when COLD are not perfectly round. When at proper operating temp your pistons are nice and round your. Oil is at the correct viscosity.
Melikefire18 1 year ago
He needs a 160 thermostat..running a bit warm for my liking...
gin03gt 1 year ago
@gin03gt my car sitts at the temp all the time
coolguy23448 1 year ago
if you use a 160 it will run a little bit over cold in return giving you more fuel and better pick up..
gin03gt 1 year ago
wouldnt run a 160 on a NA engine, thats overcooling which will damage the engine. That heat is good for burning off the soot that accumulates in the oil.
jaeshuan1 1 year ago
Have used it for 3 years with royal purple oil and filter...never 1 issue and still get 20mpg.. Trust me,it makes a huge difference in the summer...your comment is incorrect
gin03gt 1 year ago
that logic is akin to saying "smoking doesnt kill you instantly, so it must be good for you" in the end its your car, but I'd seek some info if I were you.
jaeshuan1 1 year ago
at least get on it some
caleb20091 1 year ago
metallica baby!! nice ride
xmodrock 2 years ago
I was wondering what this guy was trying to show but figured he was showing cruise speed with an idle @ about 2500rpms.
mixwell1983 2 years ago 2
i love metallica but i dont want to hear them on a car video!
05mustangguy 2 years ago
What has faster acceleration a 3.73 or a 4.10
PrimitiveStrikeForce 2 years ago
4.10
srcej6 2 years ago
then 3.73 would have a higher top speed right?
PrimitiveStrikeForce 2 years ago
Exactly.
srcej6 2 years ago
slightly but you'd never reach that point in a nearly stock mustang
mustangfan00 2 years ago
4.10s
mustangfan00 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This Shit is Gay!!!!!!!!
TINY883 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thiz shit is gay! my mom honda can do that
oscarfernandezpimp 2 years ago
are you serious??? He is showing what the highway cruising rpms are with 4.10 's in a 5spd GT.
Naste2vBrandon 2 years ago
for me 64mph= 2,500RPM so Id say this is off
Naste2vBrandon 2 years ago
different year cars have dif trans 2001 had t45 had dif fifth gear than the newer cars with the tr3650
peepeeskillz 2 years ago
ohhh thats right.
just assumed it was a 2000 like mine. my bad haha
Naste2vBrandon 2 years ago
lol its cool man, i cant wait until i get my 4.10s in haha
peepeeskillz 2 years ago
Ohhh there fun! It deffinetly helped my car from just making noise and actually pull respectibly.
Naste2vBrandon 2 years ago
02 Manual's had TR3650
Jake111992 2 years ago
@Jake111992
As did 2001 and a half's.
eventer289 2 years ago
METALLICA RULES!
zackdl 2 years ago 4
HELLZ YEA!!
bbsombs 2 years ago
why the fuck is everyone hating on metallic. all u guys must be fagots blasting ur little gino beats in your car
defergerth 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
garbage music, slow car...u fail
tiawatha 2 years ago
do you even understand the point of the video?
KtfoMustang 2 years ago
to see what rpm you will be running at with highway speeds and 4:10's
NOgo54 2 years ago
yey! gas mileage in 4:10's
BadBullitt3613 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
those 4.10s are doin alot for you and Metalica sucks if your under fifty years old
jlyons18 2 years ago
if you dont know metallica you must be either be A) under the age of 11
B) a fucking idiot or
C) gay
Sforschondetta 2 years ago 3
well guess they found the computer they are over 10
they can use the computer cant be to much of a fucking idiot
so im going with they are GAY
rickg156 2 years ago
haha i love metallica n mustnags
jessiejames2012 2 years ago
Nice guitar solo for background music.
Hankola 2 years ago
METALLICA RULES
glencoe428 2 years ago
THE FUCK THEY DO GLENCOE428!!!!!
94fordf350 2 years ago
metallica "one", Best fucking song ever!!!!!!
94fordf350 2 years ago
gas must kick your butt dude
jakers247 2 years ago 2
ur video is BORING. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA AH AHA HA HA HA HA
LUISx512 2 years ago
Metallica FTW
INFERREDD 2 years ago 40
i was just rockin to this song lol
SpdDemon69 2 years ago 5
And my mustang gt is a sn-95 also 1997 to be exact!
REUSAMPS4LIFE 3 years ago
song?
StormJordan15 3 years ago
One by Metallica.
veritech102 3 years ago
+1 justice for all
Das3030 3 years ago 26
@Das3030 +2 ONE!!!
aman2live4 1 year ago
song??? r you serious???? how do you not know what song that was. GOD people need to be more social.....
tabletop45 2 years ago
dude, u don't even need to be social to know this song, it's in guitar hero 3. u could buy the game and sit at your house all day and still know the song.
jihadsquad07 2 years ago
and there's the problem with guitar hero 3.
song's been around for 20+ years and all these little shytes with no lives are goin "ooh i can do the solo from one....in guitar hero" lol
fyi, not knocking you, just those dumbasses who think guitar hero is even close to the real thing
KtfoMustang 2 years ago
fuck yeah metallica!
danetp 3 years ago 5
wat does a mustang with stock gear ratios run it rpm's at wen its doing 70
eastwind428 3 years ago
about 2700-2800.
rocky440 3 years ago
sorry i meant 17-1800
rocky440 3 years ago
It's like 1950-2000
StriderTacticaL 3 years ago
like 1800-1900 ..
Treyb0220 3 years ago
good choice in background song lol
BBoyFunky 3 years ago
I love my 4.10's!
SSone97 3 years ago
Okay, but why not run through the gears, to show people how nicely those gears can wake up a stock GT.
HypnoticSuggestion 3 years ago
mm nothing like metallica
x742617000027 3 years ago 5
im new here and i have a 4.10s running 2200 at 70 miles but it is a harley lol
oscarnenex 3 years ago
no doubt i have a 96gt with a 04 alum block ported heads,cams u name it its got it 7lb of boost i made 481 rwh... and have the dyno on here to prove it..
96vortechGT 3 years ago
low gearing alows higher torque for acceleration but less speed per gear
jayguy173 3 years ago
worthless vid.
SkAtEOrDie67 3 years ago
Haha that songs on guitar hero 3! I've got 85% on expert I can't beat it.
Shifterkartsforlyfe 3 years ago
rock on man i just beat it not too long ago took me quite a while lol
ryno89077711 3 years ago
Actually the 4.6 SOHC is a pretty good engine. Very responsive to mods and very reliable. Thats why fleet cars (cops and cabbies) use them. Just because you don't like Ford doesn't mean you should give out false information. And I own a Camaro.
FiredUpZ28 4 years ago 4
Actually the SOHC 4.6 is crap, ive seen a full bolt-on GT lose to a stock ls1, You wanna see a engine that respnds good to mods LS1, and i have a mustang, if you have a mustang and wanna hang with the big boys you need a DOHC 4.6.
cooldbz12 3 years ago
you are right 4.6 does not respond to mods that well... i have a 98 mustang gt (pi swap, CAI, throttle body, tune, exhaust, tko500 tranny, sport clutch, etc. and it makes 260 to the wheels :( But i gotta admit it is hella quick. And how much does the stock ls1 makes whp even in auto model?
napalm84 3 years ago
260-300rwhp stock, depends on the dyno and the day conditions.
cooldbz12 3 years ago
I think i will buy one of those, even if i find an auto... BTW today, one guy was saying that his stock ws6 A4 put down 311rwhp bone stock... Seems too good to be true lol
napalm84 3 years ago
There are some freak ls1s out there.
cooldbz12 3 years ago
my friend btw has a 2000 trans am with CAI and Exhaust but is a4 and wants to race me, do you think i have a chance?
napalm84 3 years ago
yea...u lose about 60 hp thu an auto and they were rated at 325 the ws6
47glavine 3 years ago
That's because Ford put low-restriction parts on the car. There cannot be a performance gain if there wasn't a restriction prior to modification.
4.6ls DO NOT respond to bolt-on CRAP because it's just a marketing ploy. However, 4.6ls LOVE boost. They respond VERY well.
dawrr 3 years ago
lol, i just bought a 02 t/a with the 6 speed bone stock. I havent driven it that much since i bought it because it needs to be insured... it does not seem as fast as some people claim it is...
napalm84 3 years ago
If it makes you feel any better, my GT came over-rated by 50hp from factory. Claimed- 260. Actual- 210.
No matter... It's double that now ;)
But gears would DEFINITELY make your car jump.
dawrr 3 years ago
If you are talking about a 99-04 mustang gt then it is normal for cars. Its "crank" hp is 260 but at the wheels it puts out 210- although i am not sure why yours puts out 210. Most that year gt's put 230 Wheel Hp bone stock.
napalm84 3 years ago
what the hell are u talking about...do u even own one....i have an 02gt and it responded very well to the bolt-ons...u dont know shit...with just headers you can get 10rwhp or more since the stock exhaust manifolds are so restrictive...not to mention the intake manifold ,throttle body, and plenum which are to damn small stock..the heads are really restrictive...you dont know shit...i might have a factory freak 4.6 but with full bolt ons,gears, and a tune im putting down 312rwhp..
Mach1isaac 3 years ago 3
Yes, I own a 505hp GT with none of those stupid little bolt-ons. Heads are not considered "bolt ons." You are mistaken about headers. Most aftermarket headers on an N/A PI 4.6l cause you to lose torque and in many cases, LOSE hp. Also, please do not "add" gains. I doubt your "312" number is dyno proven.
dawrr 3 years ago
headers do add hp if done with the proper mods...i never said heads were bolt-ons..backpressure is a bitch and is needed in different ways if stock....you loose Torque not hp though...like i said i might have a factory freak...ive seen 2 other gt's do the same and when they installed a comp xe262ah cam they put down 335whp...my 72 mach is pushing 650whp and im a certified ford tech. so i know a bit about stangs since i put the mach together and the gt also..when im done it should be at 600+whp
Mach1isaac 3 years ago
that kids an idiot man... your absolutly right and I called his bluff on his so-called 505hp stang WITHOUT bolt-ons... it's impossible on a fuel injected to realize those kind of numbers without all the supporting hardware/equipment... those being the bolt-ons.
mullikin 3 years ago
your an idiot dude... without all those "stupid little bolt-ons" (intakes upper/lower, Throttle body, MAF sensor, CAI, full exhaust, heads, injectors, fuel pump, etc, etc i would love to know how you managed 505hp to the wheels or at the crank. Show us a video of your car mr 19 yr old genious... not the 8sec vid you have up or the "project 2008" you have up with someone else's name at the begining.
mullikin 3 years ago
i think he has a supercharged gt, maybe kenne bell. Even so with only a kenne bell and no suporting mods, 2V gts only put down about 370whp on avg. That guy is a dumbass, he doesnt even have that at the crank, and thats if that car is even his....lol....I forgot to clown him on that before..
Mach1isaac 3 years ago
Actually, I never had 505hp with the "stupid little bolt-ons." I have an intercooled Kenne Bell 2.1l setup @ 9lbs and a Nitrous Express wet system running at 30 for a chemical intercooler. On top of that, I have the Kenne Bell big tube inlet kit which includes the 90mm MAFM and 75mm TB and various other modifications. Please do more research before running your mouth and making yourself look like a dumbass. The 2008 Project video is old.
This applies to you too Mach1Isaac.
dawrr 3 years ago
what the fuck do you think a MAF, TB, and inlet tube is you fuckin duche? there called "bolt ons". And for your lame fucking comment on my video... your an idiot. I have 3 Mustangs and I happen to like how my 95 looks and at least i have a car and a video of it. You bash my shit and other peoples shit and you have nothing. Go suck a dick ya whinny little cocksucker. No one cares about you and your stupid fucking comments. Your just another little youtube bitch that thinks he knows everything.
mullikin 3 years ago
You, sir, are a hypocrite. I really couldn't care less what you say. At the end of the day, my "nothing" has 200hp more than yours, and it gets it at a lower rpm. Oh, and I drive my "nothing" every single day.
You can fool yourself into thinking you're proving a point, but all you're doing is making yourself out to be an ass.
As I told you in that message, you're the reason why the stereotype exists.
dawrr 3 years ago
There are numerous dyno sheets all around that show 4.6 and 5.4 NPI and PI engines with long tubes that gain 30+hp and 35+tq, if you think headers are useless and cause loss of torque you are WRONG. And bolt on's are anything that don't require custom fabrication, the supercharger bolted on, the heads bolted on, is it a stick on car?? That shit had to bolt-on, and I want to see this 505 RWHP 2v GT with 9 lbs, the stock cobra, with 4v heads that flow as good stock as any full port and polish 2v..
joshmac46 3 years ago
Don't trust all that you read on the internet. If you'd like to really prove me wrong, invest 1000$ in some headers and dyno your car. You'll lose torque. Trust me.
Also, you're right about the whole "bolt-on" thing. By "bolt-ons" I mean those stupid little 50-200$ modifications that claim 20hp. Those are worth shit unless you're using FI.
dawrr 3 years ago
If you believe that better cylinder scavenging, lower EGT, and reduced backpressure cause a loss of power, you are an IDIOT! I have done dyno tests, worked on race engines for Roush/Yates and Petty Enterprises, headers are ESSENTIAL. I can put $300 worth of headers on my Non-PI and gain 30+hp and 40tq, no problem. Check out the new K&N intake for the GT500, they advertise 53hp just from the intake, and it has been proven to produce 50+ hp to the tires! Bolt ons don't work, yea right! Try Again!
joshmac46 3 years ago
I should have said that you lose torque on a stock engine. Modified engines OF COURSE gain power. Sorry about that.
But then again, when my car was stock it lost ALL torque with the cutouts open. Wouldn't that have the least amount of backpressure?
I have seen numerous dyno sheets in which headers with larger diameter runners produce less torque than those with smaller diameter runners (and stock exhaust manifolds)
dawrr 3 years ago
Still look into headers, maybe you are messing with shortys, I have never seen or heard of losing any torque with long tubes. And a engine requires some backpressure, you will loose torque with open manifolds or headers, and as for diameter. The tube diameter desired is dependant on horsepower and displacement(CID), bigger is not better EVER! Step tube headers will produce the most torque. If you lost torque with long tubes it was due to your lack of research and choice of headers!
joshmac46 3 years ago
I completely agree with you there. :)
Personally, I have never lost torque due to headers because I'm running the stock exhaust manifolds. Ford actually did a good job on mine. Also, I was generalizing the whole header argument around my 4.6l 2v engine. Most engines pick up a good amount of power with headers, but my engine (in general) loses torque if the headers are too large for the power output (like you said above).
Of course, FI applications warrant headers. I'm picking some up soon
dawrr 3 years ago
they dont really help torque but they do help power, that is the truth
94EglVisionTSI 3 years ago
he forgot the 500? or mabey he has a 350 chevy big block? those engines in stangs are sick
97PImustangGT 3 years ago
yes indeed...or a BUILT 5.0 lol
47glavine 3 years ago
is that an automatic? if so you're in overdrive...thats about what my cars running at 70..hmmm
gitrdonegt 4 years ago
No I think he has a 5-speed. I have 4.10s in my GT with a rebuilt 4R70W automatic. At 65mph it sits at 2400rpms.
dawrr 3 years ago
you are correct
Raschre 4 years ago
I really don't thinks that's possible. 75mph@2600RPM = 180mph@6000 rpm, and with 3.73's close to 200mph@6000. My Z has a 4.08 and it tops at 160mph@7000. Unless it's an automatic tansmission, then this is possible.
1993z32 4 years ago
he most likely is in his OD gear and i believe 4.10's run out at 120-130. the reason for this video i assume, was to see rpm's at highway speeds. any 4+ gears usually turn people away cause of this effecting gas mileage. i say go all the way with 4.30's
acbd659491 4 years ago
I guess that is feasable, 5th gear in a mustang is probably a little longer than in my Z due to a lower RPM range in the mustang.
1993z32 4 years ago
well i know my 02 redlined when it was stock at like 5800 the powerband was 3500-5500. 5th gear usually isnt used in racing unless they do put 3.90-4.30's in. damn low revving fords. thank god mine can now rev to 6700
acbd659491 4 years ago
Wow 6700rpm thats awesome, she must scream. Any videos? I think my stock redline is 6900 and its at 7200 now, but I want to build it to handle 8000+ someday :)
1993z32 4 years ago
no videos.. im not tech savy.. but all my power is down low anyway cause i have a twin screw kenne bell... so it rarely sees redline. but since its an MMR block with forged internals.. i can spin that sucker.
acbd659491 4 years ago
sorry but wrong. 4.10s will take you to just north of 160 in 5th near redline. thats just my experience though. and for the guy asking about what the 5th gear is in a mustang, its .62
metalmatt1017 4 years ago
i love it when people spew nonsense... why would anyone race LONG ENOUGH to get to 5th gear... number 2.. if you need to get to 160 to see who won the race.. id say you probably lost.
acbd659491 4 years ago
i didnt do that in a race. i rarely race off the track. that was just a run to satisfy my curiosity as to how fast will it go with 4.10s, and it was done on a dead strip of insterstate.
metalmatt1017 4 years ago
you havent heard of a gear calculator?? and on the interstate? you havent heard of a pothole? hit a pothole at 160 and watch what happens. you should have went with 4.30's. and honestly i dont see a mustang hitting 160 without pieces flying off.
acbd659491 4 years ago
wheres the fun in that?
i believe you underestimate the quality of the mustang. they are actually very stable cars at high speed. just cuz you moms honda wont do it dont be jelous.
metalmatt1017 4 years ago