I wish someone would just blow the whole place up with everything in it destroyed in a second. The only sadness I would feel would be the deaths of the innocent animals, and the fact that the employees didn't suffer enough! Only until all these places are burned to the ground will future animals escape horrific torture...
This can only go on as long as they make money at it. When it is no longer profitable, it will stop. The only way you will ever make a change is to hit these people the only place they understand it, in the pocketbook. Giving money to activist will do little but let them put food on their table. Stop buying products that use animals. Before you get your hamburger at the drive thru, visit a slaughter house, see how hungry you are then.
These "people" are the lowest scum on the face ofthe earth. They deserve to spend eternity in the darkest corner of Hell having the same torture inflicted on them that they inflicted on these innocent animals.
Hey...ihatemonkeys666....i agree with u 100 effin percent !!!! I would LOVE a job in 1 of these facilitys, anything to get my hands on these stupid lil scumbags !!!! i look in my local newspaper everyday for adoptions or any 4-sale so i can bring it into my world an let me tell u, covance would be like a nice hotel affter i get thru with them.
First off, monkeys in the wild are subject to disease and starvation. In the wild, where the narrato would have you believe these animals live together so happy, the babies are killed when ever a new leader takes over so the females will go in to heat and mate with him.
I'm not saying that any animal should be subject to this environment, but they do not have a life that the narrator would have you believe.
The labs are bad enough, why lie to make it seem worse? Removes all creditability.
@lleo11 As awesome as that would be, they would never test on something that could potentialy fight back and actually win. They're more confortable with testing on helpless creatures that have little to no related DNA to humans.
(Wouldn't it make more sense to be testing on something like a chimp or other closely related primate if the tests are for products for humans? Snce when are spider monkeys and beagles our distant relatives?)
this is straight fucked up. i dont understand how you could do that, just to make some more fucked up drugs or cosmetics that we dont need. smash it and set them free.
Thank you medical science for all the life saving products you created. I does suck the monkeys have to go threw all this but it has to be done for the good of humanity. If we can't test on animals we would have to test on humans and monkeys aren't human so to bad for them.
@johncase7777 You're not very smart are you? Do much research on subjects that you speak of? Didn't think so. Are you inundated with old myths and propaganda? Yep, thought so. Former scientific director of Huntington Life Sciences, Dr Ralph Haywood said, "The best guess for the correlation of adverse reactions between human and animal toxicity data is somewhere between 5% and 25%" and "90% of our work is done for legal and not for scientific reasons." So what exactly were you saying again?
@heyhvadfanden Feel free to volunteer yourself for testing if you feel so strongly about it. You probably use all the products they test on the animals yourself on a daily base.
@heyhvadfanden Despite what they did testing on rapists and pedophiles and murders is also called torture. So your saying your against animal torture but you're for human torture?! You're call me heartless. Also ever heard of the word hypocrite?
this is really cruel and unnecessary. If its purpose is to save human lives,why the fuck don't they test it on humans? fuck death penalty,use the people who are sentenced to do something really useful instead of killing them. Besides, if it's your time it's your time, it's not fucking right to kill millions of innocent animals to save your sorry ass. Biggest problem of humans is that we're too much attached to our pointless stupid lives and we don't want to die when nature says so
Consider this fact if you will, how heartless these people who work in these horriffic places, become to do the testing on the animals and have no remorse. To know that you are slowly killing defenseless animals, even their babys, for a few dollars. They, themselves, should become test subjects and suffer as the animals have. It has been proven that many of the test are frutless and the results neglected. HELLO!!
@silverfox605 Do you know every medical breakthrough. Every life saved from a drug, surgical practice etc, was made possible by animal testing. I'm a vegan and consider myself an environmentalist but animal testing for non cosmetic purposes saves human lives.
Unlike eating meat this IS nessicary. It should be done as ethically as possible, but it isn't just for a few dollars. It's to save human lives.
I respect your how you feel. I truly do. Consider this, Go to a lab, see the dogs, cats, monkeys, baboons, chimpanzees, groundhogs, and other animals who have been burned to see how their skin resonds to this ointment or that new skin. See the holes in their heads, amputations, and other "TEST" done [humanly]. Then, contact me. I've been there in Pa.
@silverfox605 yes it's bad. But if you, your wife, your brother or sister, your CHILD were slowly dying of cancer, or would be horribly disfigured- or worse, fatally burned, wouldn't you think that it'd be worth it. Would you deny them the treatment because of the means?
I completely disagree with cosmetic animal testing in ALL cases, and even animal vivisection in universities unless it is to find NEW information that will benefit people. But call me speciesist, I value humans more.
@silverfox605 I value humans greater ability to feel more complex emotions. I value their stronger feelings and much higher ability to percieve than other animals. It's a beautiful thing only humans are capable of and I care for my own species more. It's a utalitarian case. The end justifies the means.
Hey, eating meat is much worse. They go through suffering aswell and it's only to pleasure taste buds. It's not saving anyones lives.
@hippydude89 hippie? pffft...don't lie..you're just another hipster toy vegan starbucks consuming trend chasing slut.
As i posted to someone else...former scientific director of Huntington Life Sciences, , Dr Ralph Haywood said, "The best guess for the correlation of adverse reactions between human and animal toxicity data is somewhere between 5% and 25%" and "90% of our work is done for legal and not for scientific reasons."
People must come to realize that there are valuable and much more relatable testing that can be done. We need to all tell these cancer, heart disease, and other organizations that they would get our money for testing if they leave the animals out of testing. It is holding back cures and harming and killing hundreds of thousands of animals in the mean time. When are they going to wake up? When people stop giving money to these orgs and hospitals. This must end~thank you for posting. xo
oh yes highly intelligent sentient beings often eat their own shit vomit it up and eat it again. ! gimmie a fuckin break . they are fuckin monkeys not living gods. primate research saved my life through cancer research on primates.
I think that this is the biggest disgrace to mankind. Poisoning and torturing totally helpless beings a fraction of their own size while they are struggling and sqealing beggars belief that anyone could even do it, let alone defend it! To learn that it is scientific fraud and that it is just to make money whilst harming people with the dangerous chemicals, pesticides & drugs that they put on the market as 'safe' makes it even worse! What a disgusting vile industry! Killing animals & people.
Andrew Baker, the CEO, is Evil. LSR stock was 39 and now below dollars. this company should go bankrupt. they kill animals for products that make us sick as splenda.
la miseria y crueldad del autoproclamado ser humano, el ser inteligente y pensante,
elsariguella 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Huntingdon Research Centre
Woolley Road
Alconbury
Huntingdon
Cambridgeshire
PE28 4HS
Tel: +44 (0) 1480 892 000 give them a call
hippygirl1975 1 month ago
FUCK HLS.
snakesareSCARY 2 months ago
Well for asthma treatment I guess it's all right
Gham505 5 months ago
Well for an asthma treatment I guess it's all right
Gham505 5 months ago
I wish someone would just blow the whole place up with everything in it destroyed in a second. The only sadness I would feel would be the deaths of the innocent animals, and the fact that the employees didn't suffer enough! Only until all these places are burned to the ground will future animals escape horrific torture...
tool2342 6 months ago
This can only go on as long as they make money at it. When it is no longer profitable, it will stop. The only way you will ever make a change is to hit these people the only place they understand it, in the pocketbook. Giving money to activist will do little but let them put food on their table. Stop buying products that use animals. Before you get your hamburger at the drive thru, visit a slaughter house, see how hungry you are then.
junkintrunk55 9 months ago
i want these people to die.. Not just HLS.. but all the people that abuse animals in any kind of way.
Rawrieatjoox3 9 months ago
oh i hought this was HLS aka HIGH LEVEL SWAG
SP00FCAKE 11 months ago
how can we stop this???
TheKika212 1 year ago
@TheKika212 by stopping to buy products tested on animals
ellulie 11 months ago
heartbreaking!!!!
life is this?? shit
killers
criminals, not scientists
tereziaildiko 1 year ago
heartbreaking!!!!
life is this?? shit
tereziaildiko 1 year ago
heartbreaking!!!!
tereziaildiko 1 year ago
essa gente é doente... doente.... sem palavras!!
moemanc 1 year ago
@orion1488 I highly agree scum bags
tamiyaboy100 1 year ago
These "people" are the lowest scum on the face ofthe earth. They deserve to spend eternity in the darkest corner of Hell having the same torture inflicted on them that they inflicted on these innocent animals.
Orion1488 1 year ago
Hey...ihatemonkeys666....i agree with u 100 effin percent !!!! I would LOVE a job in 1 of these facilitys, anything to get my hands on these stupid lil scumbags !!!! i look in my local newspaper everyday for adoptions or any 4-sale so i can bring it into my world an let me tell u, covance would be like a nice hotel affter i get thru with them.
macartney73 1 year ago 2
First off, monkeys in the wild are subject to disease and starvation. In the wild, where the narrato would have you believe these animals live together so happy, the babies are killed when ever a new leader takes over so the females will go in to heat and mate with him.
I'm not saying that any animal should be subject to this environment, but they do not have a life that the narrator would have you believe.
The labs are bad enough, why lie to make it seem worse? Removes all creditability.
junkintrunk55 1 year ago
How long will it take, how much evidence before this evil, UNNECESSARY place will be shut down?
hollybee43 1 year ago
it would be so awesome if they would have a huge gorilla their that escapes and breaks down the doors and rips all those bastards faces of
lleo11 1 year ago
@lleo11 As awesome as that would be, they would never test on something that could potentialy fight back and actually win. They're more confortable with testing on helpless creatures that have little to no related DNA to humans.
(Wouldn't it make more sense to be testing on something like a chimp or other closely related primate if the tests are for products for humans? Snce when are spider monkeys and beagles our distant relatives?)
squeefreak19 1 year ago
@squeefreak19 or maybe use all the psychopath serial killers in prison all over the world that deserve it and are human that would make more sense.
lleo11 1 year ago
this is straight fucked up. i dont understand how you could do that, just to make some more fucked up drugs or cosmetics that we dont need. smash it and set them free.
kingdaddysam 1 year ago
Thank you medical science for all the life saving products you created. I does suck the monkeys have to go threw all this but it has to be done for the good of humanity. If we can't test on animals we would have to test on humans and monkeys aren't human so to bad for them.
johncase7777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@johncase7777 You're not very smart are you? Do much research on subjects that you speak of? Didn't think so. Are you inundated with old myths and propaganda? Yep, thought so. Former scientific director of Huntington Life Sciences, Dr Ralph Haywood said, "The best guess for the correlation of adverse reactions between human and animal toxicity data is somewhere between 5% and 25%" and "90% of our work is done for legal and not for scientific reasons." So what exactly were you saying again?
sp4zzj4zz 1 year ago
@johncase7777 you bitch,
if i had to choose between testing on a monkey and you, it would defently be you
burn up in hell motherfucker
heyhvadfanden 1 year ago
@heyhvadfanden Feel free to volunteer yourself for testing if you feel so strongly about it. You probably use all the products they test on the animals yourself on a daily base.
johncase7777 1 year ago
@johncase7777 you must be really heartless if you would test on animals instead of rapists and phedofiles and murders
as for your informations i threw all animals tested things out of my house,
but that is not any of your business
motherfucker
as said before, burn up in hell bitch.
heyhvadfanden 1 year ago
@heyhvadfanden Despite what they did testing on rapists and pedophiles and murders is also called torture. So your saying your against animal torture but you're for human torture?! You're call me heartless. Also ever heard of the word hypocrite?
johncase7777 1 year ago
@johncase7777 if you canot read that i called you heartless then you must be really blind.
human toture? no, im just giving them some of their own medicine
as for the word hypocrite, the only hypocrite around here is you.
bitch
heyhvadfanden 1 year ago
this is really cruel and unnecessary. If its purpose is to save human lives,why the fuck don't they test it on humans? fuck death penalty,use the people who are sentenced to do something really useful instead of killing them. Besides, if it's your time it's your time, it's not fucking right to kill millions of innocent animals to save your sorry ass. Biggest problem of humans is that we're too much attached to our pointless stupid lives and we don't want to die when nature says so
Sommomk 2 years ago 2
@Sommomk I agree with you 100%
Juillardl 1 year ago
they're so intelliegent, you might as well do it to humans, they're probobly more intelliegent than most humans
goldenfilly 2 years ago 3
Consider this fact if you will, how heartless these people who work in these horriffic places, become to do the testing on the animals and have no remorse. To know that you are slowly killing defenseless animals, even their babys, for a few dollars. They, themselves, should become test subjects and suffer as the animals have. It has been proven that many of the test are frutless and the results neglected. HELLO!!
silverfox605 2 years ago
@silverfox605 Do you know every medical breakthrough. Every life saved from a drug, surgical practice etc, was made possible by animal testing. I'm a vegan and consider myself an environmentalist but animal testing for non cosmetic purposes saves human lives.
Unlike eating meat this IS nessicary. It should be done as ethically as possible, but it isn't just for a few dollars. It's to save human lives.
hippydude89 2 years ago
I respect your how you feel. I truly do. Consider this, Go to a lab, see the dogs, cats, monkeys, baboons, chimpanzees, groundhogs, and other animals who have been burned to see how their skin resonds to this ointment or that new skin. See the holes in their heads, amputations, and other "TEST" done [humanly]. Then, contact me. I've been there in Pa.
silverfox605 2 years ago
@silverfox605 yes it's bad. But if you, your wife, your brother or sister, your CHILD were slowly dying of cancer, or would be horribly disfigured- or worse, fatally burned, wouldn't you think that it'd be worth it. Would you deny them the treatment because of the means?
I completely disagree with cosmetic animal testing in ALL cases, and even animal vivisection in universities unless it is to find NEW information that will benefit people. But call me speciesist, I value humans more.
hippydude89 2 years ago
@silverfox605 I value humans greater ability to feel more complex emotions. I value their stronger feelings and much higher ability to percieve than other animals. It's a beautiful thing only humans are capable of and I care for my own species more. It's a utalitarian case. The end justifies the means.
Hey, eating meat is much worse. They go through suffering aswell and it's only to pleasure taste buds. It's not saving anyones lives.
hippydude89 2 years ago
@silverfox605 If you're going to be pissed at any way humans exploit other creatures, animal testing is probably the weakest one to go for.
hippydude89 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hippydude89 hippie? pffft...don't lie..you're just another hipster toy vegan starbucks consuming trend chasing slut.
As i posted to someone else...former scientific director of Huntington Life Sciences, , Dr Ralph Haywood said, "The best guess for the correlation of adverse reactions between human and animal toxicity data is somewhere between 5% and 25%" and "90% of our work is done for legal and not for scientific reasons."
sp4zzj4zz 1 year ago
People must come to realize that there are valuable and much more relatable testing that can be done. We need to all tell these cancer, heart disease, and other organizations that they would get our money for testing if they leave the animals out of testing. It is holding back cures and harming and killing hundreds of thousands of animals in the mean time. When are they going to wake up? When people stop giving money to these orgs and hospitals. This must end~thank you for posting. xo
italndiva 2 years ago
oops...reliable instead of relatable. Stop this insanity!!
italndiva 2 years ago
roflmao @ the misfortune and suffering of these monkeys.
kingcrimson234 2 years ago
ta2joe13 doesn't even sound like he was worth saving from cancer.....
julesie89 2 years ago
oh yes highly intelligent sentient beings often eat their own shit vomit it up and eat it again. ! gimmie a fuckin break . they are fuckin monkeys not living gods. primate research saved my life through cancer research on primates.
ta2joe13 2 years ago
Poor animals!
liennuh 2 years ago
Bastard!
CRISTIANCANTA 2 years ago
poi ci lamentiamo degli alieni che ci rapiscono x farci esperimenti..
ma minimo!!
guardate li ke skifooo
COME TRATTANO QUEGLI ANIMALI....
noi umani siamo una razza di me****
Yesobbell 2 years ago
Plain evil!
Soulisscool 2 years ago
HLS.....Humans Lack Sense
sammyboyman12333 2 years ago 2
I think that this is the biggest disgrace to mankind. Poisoning and torturing totally helpless beings a fraction of their own size while they are struggling and sqealing beggars belief that anyone could even do it, let alone defend it! To learn that it is scientific fraud and that it is just to make money whilst harming people with the dangerous chemicals, pesticides & drugs that they put on the market as 'safe' makes it even worse! What a disgusting vile industry! Killing animals & people.
Soulisscool 2 years ago 2
that is fuking discusting they dont deserve to suffer who ever runs and works for hls should be burt alive
yebesn 3 years ago 2
I couldn't finish this video cos thinking about what happens to the animals totally breaks my heart. Smash HLS and burn them down!
stephjuhler999 3 years ago 18
@stephjuhler999 If you haven't already buy cruelty-free products
Juillardl 1 year ago
Andrew Baker, the CEO, is Evil. LSR stock was 39 and now below dollars. this company should go bankrupt. they kill animals for products that make us sick as splenda.
horsesinnyc 3 years ago 16
Animal testing just isnt right morally
ImaScotsman 3 years ago 7