I loved the film! It was visually beautiful and the story was entertaining. I had hoped, however, that somebody else than George Clooney would voice Mr Fox. I thought about somebody like Johnny Depp or Robert Downey Jr, because their voices are less action-hero like. But that's just my opinion of course.
This is truly a beautiful movie. The problem with people who don't like it is that they can't see the genius in it, or the incredible artistic value and symbolism.
Lackluster animation, shoddy puppet construction, casting done purely for marquee value, weak plot, confusing dialogue, flat staging, forgetable music... How does THIS add up to a 91% rating?
My point is that you are so close-minded and stupid that anything not packed with explosions or dick jokes it is beyond you. It looks homemade because it's a small budget film that has a homemade feel to it, and it looks perfect and awesome, to boot. The music, you haven't heard it before, and that makes you feel stupid. The what the cuss was brilliant, poking fun at cussing while ironically using the word cuss for a swear word! Or did you not understand that?
I came to the conclusion that you not liking the film due to lack of stupid humor and action, because you clearly missed the point of the film... everyone is giving this amazing reviews except you. Why? You don't get it. Why don't you? It doesn't hold the IQ equal to that of a fly or at least some dirt.
The music bit does make sense... like most things I notice, you just don't understand it. Since you haven't heard the music in it, that makes you feel dumb because you don't know of it.
And why do they have to cuss? How exactly can they cuss and keep it rated PG? They can't. So now it's rated PG-13 or R. How many 13-21 years olds are going to see this film. Not many!
This is just business-wise, too!
It was brilliant how they got the point across without sacrificing anything all!
Ok, so it was original, smart, and funny, they got the point of swearing across without actually swearing, which means more money for them, and it is funnier, and you don't like it because its not real cussing. If you're looking for fucking swearing in a children's stop motion movie, look somewhere else, moron.
It wasn't smart OR funny. It was just a cop-out. I wouldn't be making this complaint if they either just had the balls to do it out-right or avoid it completely.
The staging was done for a fucking stop motion film! Not for a live action one, of course they had to use props, what do you suggest they use? And what the fuck, looks 2 inches deep? They looked professional and realistic in a cartoonish way. You just didn't like it because you didn't know the director and because it wasn't main stream. Grow some fucking culture, asshole.
What ARE you talking about? The staging looked as if it was shot out in actual houses! I'd very much like to see you make a fucking better movie set, since you are obviously so skilled, sir.
Why can't it look professional, realistic and homemade at the same time? It was homemade, done by professionals, and realistic because of the use of real costumes made by professional tailors and actual hair on the puppets.
You didn't enjoy it because it was not the norm. You're a total poser.
Weird, because the puppets in this movie were made by the same people as in Corpse Bride. Also, has it even even occurred to you that there are different styles of directing, puppeteering, and directing? Of course not. You're too close-minded.
It is also worth it to point out how you defend Tim Burton, who (while I have nothing but respect for him) designs characters with ludicrously sized proportions, yet you say that this movie isn't realistic? This movie is incredibly real looking.
You said directing twice. And yes, there are different styles of directing. Since when does that mean it's okay to make it look slapped together?
I say that the realism you're trying to prove here is betrayed by its desire to look homemade. Unrealistic though Burton's aesthetic often is, at least it's polished.
Yeah, I meant to put architecture (doing the scenery). I never said it's ok to look slapped together. But now you seem to agree with me, albeit to bitch about it looking slapped together, which it kind of does. And you know what? It looks perfect, and I wouldn't change a damn thing about it. I KNOW for a fact it was professional, it sure as hell looks realistic, and definitely homemade. It looks awesome, so fuck you.
So we're in agreement that it looks slapped together. How then do you insist on its looking professional/realistic when looking slapped together is the antithesis of those ideals? It's only one or the other.
No it is not! This movie is a perfect example of how it can be all three. It was supposed to look realistic and homemade, yet professional. You won't see a movie like this from your 7th grade classroom. It looked all 3! I don't understand how you're not getting this!
Except for their intricately constructed heads (which begs the question of why they didn't go all out with the REST of their anatomy), the puppets in this movie looked like they were made of pipecleaners with fur wrapped around them. That's NOT professional-looking.
No they didn't! And aside from which, the head is the only part of the body you can see on the characters! How the hell do you know if they're constructed shoddily or not? Now you're really just fishing for things that MIGHT be wrong with the film, but they aren't necessarily. Kind of a nagging bith, aren't you?
The puppets took very long to make and everything about them was hand crafted and done on purpose. If they wanted to make everything look more realistic, they would have. It is just the feel of the movie. Watch the featurettes about the movie on the FoxSearchlight YouTube channel. Also, I'd like to see YOU make a stop-motion film better than this. Dude, I honestly don't understand why you don't get this movie.
Sorry for intruding on the arguement but I really wanted to say something.
I don't have to make a better stop motion movie; we've already got folks like Henry Selick, Tim Burton, and Nick Park who are constantly raising the visual bar. Why is it the superior strategy to intentionally make it look as bad as this?
I don't get this movie because it's doing all the same faux paus that OTHER animated films would get all kinds of flack for, but people seem to be interpreting it as something brilliant just because it has Wes Anderson's name on it.
So you're basically saying they can't make a film that is visually different. Just because other filmmakers "raise the visual bar" doesn't mean one has to conform to the same style to be better. The movie is liked because the puppets aren't like Tim Burton's. The high texture gives this movie its unique quality and feel. They used close-ups to show you that. While the plot may not be brilliantly unique, the way it is performed makes it so. But I guess not everyone sees it that way.
I agree. There is a difference. However, in my and plenty of other people's opinions, that was not the case with this film. I'm sorry you fail to agree.
This wasn't praised because of Wes Anderson's name. It was praised because it was a brilliant film with incredible animation, has a deep message with an easy to follow story, a great classic soundtrack that fit the film perfectly, terrific voice and sound work, and has some undeniably funny humor. *That's* why this film is highly praised.
Look as bad as what? This is the best-looking stop-motion film to have ever been released. No other stop-motion comes close. Not even by a mile.
The animation was lousy, there was no message (if there was, do correct me), the music was forgettable, all the voice talent was pure marquee value, and I can't recall laughing ONCE at the 'humor' in this.
If you think THIS is the best-looking stop motion film ever released, you literally have no idea what you're talking about.
@Bobzeaux This animation was FAR better than anything Burton has ever done. His characters look like he just bought some Play-Doh and constructed a model. No message? How about understanding that we're not always who we think we are? I happened to be laughing the entire movie. Shame there were no poop and dick jokes to amuse you.
If you think Tim Burton is the god of filmmaking, you really, REALLY need to get out of your emo phase and watch some real films.
@Bobzeaux Oh, I'm sorry, I guess you're a fart joke kind of person. My bad.
Name some of these films that completely 'blow this film out of the water' because I sure as hell can't do it.
And, yes, the way you defend him, you'd swear he was the king of directors. And he's far from it, especially with the way he murdered Willy Wonka and Alice.
The puppets cost an average of $80,000 per character. Where can you buy $80,000 pipe cleaners? Nowhere.
While he's still stealing food at the end of the film, this is merely a temporary food source until a more permanent one can be found. You obviously weren't paying attention to the monologue he gives where he admits to himself that, through connecting with his animal instincts, he screwed everything up. He understands that his wild side got the best of him.
"..especially with the way he murdered Willy Wonka and Alice."
A couple of quick calculations show that the average IMDB rating of any Anderson movie is 7.4, while this "muderer" of whom you speak ranks in at 7.3. Who knew that the difference between the rank of murderer and god (if defense = worship, according to you) is only 0.1 on a scale of 1 to 10?
@Bobzeaux There is nothing out there so accurate that I will believe it.
It's called an opinion. I guess if you're favorite movie doesn't blow anything else out of the water, you're biased towards that, too. Maybe one day, something will top this movie in my opinion. But right now cinema has yet to do that.
Plus, not to mention Disaster Movie was #1 on IMDB's Bottom 100 before it was even released because all of the users rated it a 1 without even seeing it. Proof on how unbiased the site is.
That's the purpose... it's your way of interpreting what will happen next. What will happen when the farmers eventually discover the raid? It's up to you to decide.
"It's called anthropomorphism and it's a literary device that has been around for hundreds of years."
Fully aware of that. But when you're living an otherwise human lifestyle, you're not in much of a position to go around saying you're a 'wild animal'.
@Bobzeaux I won't blame it on my animal nature, but I'll certainly blame it on not understanding who I am. Maybe I think I'm destined to be wild and crazy, and I'm not.
And yes, this film just happens to be my favorite film of all time. People have different opinions, you know. Oh wait, you're head is so far up your ass that you didn't know that.
@Bobzeaux I know that by having been a regular visitor at that site for about 6 years and happened to just ponder on the boards to see what everyone was thinking about the movie. It wasn't even released and was already #1 in the bottom 100.
The statement that being homemade completely cancels out being professional. It doesn't.
I guess that all good movies have to completely wrap up the ending?
"Yeah, and you didn't just pull *that* above comment out of nowhere, I suppose."
Nope. It's not pulled out of nowhere, but based on what's been previously stated (and, of course, I need to explain this to the person who stated it in the first place). Conversely, when have I ever stated that I didn't laugh at this movie because it didn't have any poop/dick/fart jokes?
Why come and comment on this video when you didn't like the movie in the first place? Don't give me that typical 'I have a freedom of speech' garbage. I already know that you do.
"Why come and comment on this video when you didn't like the movie in the first place? Don't give me that typical 'I have a freedom of speech' garbage. I already know that you do"
'Garbage', huh? ;P
I originally commented on this video because I was seeking some sort of clarity. I couldn't understand why this movie is loved the way it is when it does everything that so many other movies would be criticized for.
@Bobzeaux Yes, considering that's what assholes like you say every time they start a fucking flame war.
This film was praised because it deserved it. Top-notch animation, all-star voice acting, clever, witty humor, a great, upbeat soundtrack, intricate detail, an easy to follow storyline, and amusing characters. That's why it was praised.
"Yes, considering that's what assholes like you say every time they start a fucking flame war."
Once again, way to disprove my theory that you don't know what you're talking about. ;P I didn't start this flame war, and I'm not the one calling people assholes.
"Top-notch animation"
They intentionally made the animation look primitive.
"all-star voice acting"
It has TOO MUCH all-star voice acting, like 'Robots'.
@Bobzeaux Are you new to the Internet? Either you are, or you lack common sense: when you post something negative to get a angered response, it's called flaming. I simply countered you're arguments and you blew it out of proportion.
Alright, then if this animation is so primitive and so unprofessional, go buy a Nikon D3, construct all of the models, props, and sets, and re-shoot the entire movie. After all, it's homemade and unprofessional! /s
@Bobzeaux Seriously? When you come on here and post a negative comment, you know you're going to get slammed for it. This is the Internet. It's an all-out flame war between people, sometimes even between people who like said topic.
"Judging by the way the 360 looks... I'd say the other ones."
You know, I didn't look at those when you first mentioned them. Now that I do, I gotta say, those all look pretty slick. So then if it's possible for something homemade to look professional, what's so wrong with making this professionally made movie look professional instead of looking simplistically homemade?
"I love how someone is flagging all of your comments as spam, certainly isn't me."
Actually I can't even tell, thanks to this new stupid youtube format. >;( And what exactly was the purpose of you pointing that out? It's not like this video is attracting hundreds of viewers/commenters a day. If I'm getting so many flags, OF COURSE it's coming from the person disagreeing with me. Are YOU new to the internet or something?
"They're all homemade and blow the 'professional' 360 out of the water."
That's not what I asked. Which one LOOKS like it has the most thought and execution put into it?
"Yeah, because every movie that has an ending that wasn't wrapped up was a cop-out."
No, saying that not all good movies have to wrap up nicely like every OTHER movie has to is a cop-out. '9' had a bit of a strange, open ending to it and got criticized for it. What's protecting THIS movie from such a criticism?
@Bobzeaux Judging by the way the 360 looks... I'd say the other ones.
This movie was protected because that was how the novel was originally intended to end. The ending for the novel was far more of a cop-out. It ended with the farmers just sitting there by the manhole, waiting for the animals - the supermarket was scrapped by Dahl. Wes knew he needed to find a new ending and stumbled upon the supermarket. It was protected by remaining faithful to the novel, yet adding a new element.
"The statement that being homemade completely cancels out being professional. It doesn't."
Which structure would you think had the most obvious thought, manpower, and resources behind it; a shack in Mexico made out of scraps of wood and whatever is available, or the Chrysler Building?
"I guess that all good movies have to completely wrap up the ending?"
@Bobzeaux The XBox 360 had a lot of thought, manpower, and resources behind it and there are tons of homemade gaming projects that outperform it in terms of reliability. Look at the Wireless Game Gun, the NES Coffee Table, the Nintoaster and Super Nintoaster, and the Super Genintari. They're all homemade and blow the 'professional' 360 out of the water.
Yeah, because every movie that has an ending that wasn't wrapped up was a cop-out. You're so smart, where do you get all of this knowledge?! /s
"I won't blame it on my animal nature, but I'll certainly blame it on not understanding who I am."
Wild animals don't think about existentiality. They're too busy focusing on how to get their next meal.
"People have different opinions, you know. Oh wait, you're head is so far up your ass that you didn't know that."
Yep. People have different opinions....... but God help ANYONE who doesn't like this greatest movie ever, because they have their heads up their asses if they don't!
@Bobzeaux I didn't say your head is up your ass because you disagree with me, now did I? Your head is up your fucking ass because you don't know how to respect others' opinions, and you proved it with your 'you thought this was the best film of all time' comment. Well, yeah, I did think that, and if you respected my opinions I would respect yours, too. But you don't, and therefore your head is crammed up your ass.
I love how someone is flagging all of your comments as spam, certainly isn't me.
"The puppets cost an average of $80,000 per character."
What a waste. <;P What's the point in spending so much only to intentionally make it look cheap?
"this is merely a temporary food source until a more permanent one can be found."
Why didn't the movie end with them FINDING a more permanent food source? Returning to the same dangerous status quo that got the whole conflict started to begin with isn't something to celebrate.
@Bobzeaux They didn't look cheap. It looks incredibly well-done, yet still has that 'homemade' feel that Wes was aiming for with the animation.
The point to not ending the film with them finding a more permanent food source is to leave it open for viewer interpretation. What will happen tomorrow when the farmers discover the raid? It's up to you to decide. They're celebrating over the fact that Felicity is pregnant, not the abundant food source.
"through connecting with his animal instincts, he screwed everything up."
What kind of wild animal wears clothes and writes a newspaper column anyway?
"Oh, I'm sorry, I guess you're a fart joke kind of person. My bad."
And where did I say that I'm a fart joke kind of person? At least TRY to prove you know what you're talking about instead of pulling things from out of nowhere.
And what does me calling you out for what you really are have to do with me having any culture? I know for a fact that I have better taste in music, movies and books than you, dude.
It is also worth it to say that you also called me a loser and such... filthy hypocrite.
"I know for a fact that I have better taste in music, movies and books than you, dude."
If that point (which is neither accurate or based on anything discussed here) were true, you'd be able to better defend this movie simply by answering my questions instead of engaging in verbal attacks.
"It is also worth it to say that you also called me a loser and such... filthy hypocrite."
Per YOUR argument, how does calling you out for what you really are make me a hypocrite? ;P
I have been able to defend this movie, simply by answering your questions. You have been able to dodge and avoid them rather well, nonetheless.
That's my point. You point out that I have called you an asshole, and yet you call me names, also. That is how you are a hypocrite.
Wait, perhaps you don't know what that means; forgive me. Anyone as feeble-minded as yourself couldn't possibly understand. A hypocrite is someone who calls someone out for something, yet does it themselves.
I have been able to defend this movie, simply by answering your questions." No, all you've been doing is insulting me. no explosions. Doesn't understand the homemade feel that Wes Anderson was aiming for No Megan Foxes or Kristen Stewarts Doesn't understand movies with no fighting or explosions, or cliche plot holes Biiiig words No big cities No Linkin Park or Muse Fucking loser. What questions are you answering (WITHOUT insulting), and what answers am I dodging here?
I have answered every single one of your rebuttals with one of my own. You, answer SOME of my rebuttals, presumably when you realize I'm right. And also, if all I've been doing is insulting, why has this argument gone on so long, and why do you still argue with me?
I answer every question with an insult. I'm proud of pointing out you're retarded. Also, nice contradiction. You say I don't answer any questions, but later in the same comment, I answer questions, albeit with an insult or two.
Only the mutual fabricators of Corpse Bride and Mr. Fox is the ONE point you've proven right. Kudos. Other than that, you've been doing nothing but insulting me based on absolutely nothing. Where have I ever expressed my disdain for this movie deriving from its lack of action scenes, Megan Fox or special effects? If you're going to insult someone, at least have it make sense.
Bullshit. You've managed to avoid the question, how exactly has the argument gone on so long and touched so many points if all I'm doing is blindly throwing swear words and names. And thanks, I did point that out, but don't you fucking forget how little you've pointed out. I think that would be a perfect 0 to my one.
Also, funny how you just fell on your own sword, there. Me insulting you with Megan Fox and special FX? I was implying you were stupid,and you are so stupid you didn't get it.
The argument has gone on for so long because I'm determined to find out why this movie is what it is and why it's so well-recieved. You're briefly touching on points and then you just turn it into more and more insults. I've pointed out A LOT of things that other less-known directors would get flamed for, and you haven't been able to answer why we're just supposed to accept it for THIS movie.
This movie is well received for it's humor, excellent plot, and wonderful animation. Simple, moron. If you don't like it, I believe that SpongeBob is on TV right now, and you're missing it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well, then by all means go fucking bitch about that! Honestly, you would be that fucking guy that is bitching about how awful this movie is, then turns around and watches SpongeBob all day. Are you seriously that needy for attention, negative or otherwise?
"I was implying you were stupid,and you are so stupid you didn't get it."
So.... I mention that you implied insulting me with that special effects/Megan Fox thing, and you think that I somehow MISS that implication? How does THAT make sense?
Wrong. You clearly didn't understand that I was calling you stupid. You bitched that you didn't understand what it meant. Don't act like you knew what it meant all along when you just got through asking what it meant.
"A hypocrite is someone who calls someone out for something, yet does it themselves."
Uh-huh. And I suppose you're going to sit there with a straight face and say that you're NOT one in spite of your very first comment calling me a "fucking loser" for nothing more than disliking this movie? ;P
I never called you out for insulting me. We're not talking about how many times I've insulted you, I'm saying that you're fucking retarded if you're going to go all defensive about me calling you shit while you do it yourself. At least I have the guts to admit it.
And no, I call you a fucking loser because you point out things wrong with the movie that aren't in fact wrong with it!
It's akin to disliking someone because they're black, when in fact they are white.
OK, what? More to work with"? What the fuck are you talking about? Oh, wait, you sound awful smart when you give me advice. Lol, making no sense yet wanting to come out on top.
"Tell me what's so right about everything I pointed out then."
What?! That's all I have been doing! It's basically like I tell you for 3 straight days my favorite color is green, then when I'm done, you ask me what my favorite color is. God, all I've been doing is proving you wrong about this movie, fucking moron!
you sure? I read it about... 5 years ago I believe and there were 3 farmers. One who lived on apple cider, one who bred chickens and this 2nd guy whom I can't remember what made him so unique.
Vuk or The Little Fox (Hungarian animated movie, amazingly lovely story) is kinda what I thought when I heard Fantastic Mr Fox was going to be animated.
Anthropomorphizing George Clooney was prolly not what I expected...
It's prolly a good movie in it's own right, but imo, it's not Fantastic Mr Fox. That story was about real foxes (granted, talking foxes on two legs) doing what real foxes do, only smarter. Not about the same animals running a cricket team.
I kinda preferred it if it wasn't anthropomorphic. You don't need them to act human to make a good movie, especially since the book was about real foxes (that talk, granted) doing what real foxes do - steal easy prey to live.
And having George Clooney's distinctive voice there, yeah, it just pulls away from the movie.
I loved the film! It was visually beautiful and the story was entertaining. I had hoped, however, that somebody else than George Clooney would voice Mr Fox. I thought about somebody like Johnny Depp or Robert Downey Jr, because their voices are less action-hero like. But that's just my opinion of course.
NinjaOutfitInTheWash 6 months ago
movie was as cool as Wachbat iscomplicated
finessewes9119 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SIMPLY'::COPY;,'&''.PASTE.`.
ＷＷＷ.ＷＡＴＣＨＦＵＬＬＭＯＶＩＥ.ＴＫ
SIMPLY::;COPY,.,&'':PASTE:`,
DannyPrattab 8 months ago
I'll let you in on a secret- Wanna know why Wes Anderson movies only do "so-so" at the box office? Only smart people appreciate the humor and nuance.
saybozert 8 months ago 4
This is truly a beautiful movie. The problem with people who don't like it is that they can't see the genius in it, or the incredible artistic value and symbolism.
stewdudetp 11 months ago 4
I remember reading this book as a little kid....this made it look bad...
kenski3000 1 year ago
there are alot of attitudes going on around here. don't let me get one.
leavethisworld1 1 year ago
there are alot of attitudes going on around here. don't let me get one.
leavethisworld1 1 year ago
Comment removed
leavethisworld1 1 year ago
Whoa, kicked Where The Wild Things Are's butt? I'm renting this immediately!
rockeryears 1 year ago 4
BEST MOVIE EVER :3
charforeverbiotch 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I loved this movie.
FleishDawg 1 year ago
What the cuss
7daytheoryful 1 year ago
why would you compare this and where the wild things are: PS the latter was terrible
httrthnhtclrthncl 1 year ago
DONT YOU BE CUSSING AT ME, lol
JooceBocksEnt 1 year ago
this movie was friggin awesome
Gold171 1 year ago 6
Did anybody who was arguing below stop to think and realize it's just a movie? Albeit a very good movie ;P
xxxSilentKillxxx 1 year ago
this movie was the cuss.
govnenk 1 year ago 58
@govnenk i cussing agree with you
CrazyMongo 1 year ago
Excellent movie. Clooney's voice is what makes it. Why try to do a "voice", as one bad reviewer commented? Very funny and offbeat film. See it!
BaronRogoff1 1 year ago 28
This movie was Kick ass 5 stars all the way. :)
ultimatelionhearttv 1 year ago
I loved this movie
RobbyPaulPerson 1 year ago
wow this movie was just....just......FAN TASTIC i love wak bat
LandonRocksAtGH 1 year ago
HeHe .. Fantastic Mr.Fox was great :D .
klenner 1 year ago
Okay, seriously, what am I missing here?
Lackluster animation, shoddy puppet construction, casting done purely for marquee value, weak plot, confusing dialogue, flat staging, forgetable music... How does THIS add up to a 91% rating?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lemme clarify stuff for you.
Lackluster animation = no explosions.
Shoddy Puppet Construction = Doesn't understand the homemade feel that Wes Anderson was aiming for (and succeeded admirably)
Casting = No Megan Foxes or Kristen Stewarts
Weak Plot = Doesn't understand movies with no fighting or explosions, or cliche plot holes
Confusing Dialogue = Biiiig words
Flat staging = No big cities
Forgettable music = No Linkin Park or Muse
Fucking loser.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
Because every Disney, Don Bluth, and Henry Selick film is good animation because of THEIR use of explosions, I suppose?
Why make it look homemade instead of decent?
Megan Fox and Kristen Stewart suck.
Fighting or explosions neither add or subtract to the strength (or lack thereof in this case) of the plot.
"What the cuss"? Are you serious? ;(
flat staging=sprawling fields that look 2 inches deep=fail
The less contmporary music like that in a whimsical children's film, the better.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
My point is that you are so close-minded and stupid that anything not packed with explosions or dick jokes it is beyond you. It looks homemade because it's a small budget film that has a homemade feel to it, and it looks perfect and awesome, to boot. The music, you haven't heard it before, and that makes you feel stupid. The what the cuss was brilliant, poking fun at cussing while ironically using the word cuss for a swear word! Or did you not understand that?
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"My point is that you are so close-minded and stupid that anything not packed with explosions or dick jokes it is beyond you."
And how, pray tell, did you come to that conclusion?
"The music, you haven't heard it before, and that makes you feel stupid."
That doesn't make ANY sense. How does hearing new music make one feel stupid?
"The what the cuss was brilliant"
No, it was stupid. If you're going to swear, swear. If you're not, don't. Simple.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
I came to the conclusion that you not liking the film due to lack of stupid humor and action, because you clearly missed the point of the film... everyone is giving this amazing reviews except you. Why? You don't get it. Why don't you? It doesn't hold the IQ equal to that of a fly or at least some dirt.
The music bit does make sense... like most things I notice, you just don't understand it. Since you haven't heard the music in it, that makes you feel dumb because you don't know of it.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"It doesn't hold the IQ equal to that of a fly or at least some dirt."
So either like it, or you're an idiot. Congratulations; you've just lowered yourself to the critical level of Michael Bay's fanbase. ;P
"Since you haven't heard the music in it"
I saw the movie. How can I NOT have heard it?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Comment removed
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
And why do they have to cuss? How exactly can they cuss and keep it rated PG? They can't. So now it's rated PG-13 or R. How many 13-21 years olds are going to see this film. Not many!
This is just business-wise, too!
It was brilliant how they got the point across without sacrificing anything all!
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"It was brilliant how they got the point across without sacrificing anything all!"
No, it was irritating. If you're gonna ring the bell, ring it. Other PG movies have been swearing for years.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Yeah, little swears like "Damn" or "Hell". Some of the cussing could clearly not be substituted for just damn or hell.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
Comment removed
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
Why couldn't that be substituted? I somehow doubt that Roald Dahl stuck much swearing in the original book.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Ok, so it was original, smart, and funny, they got the point of swearing across without actually swearing, which means more money for them, and it is funnier, and you don't like it because its not real cussing. If you're looking for fucking swearing in a children's stop motion movie, look somewhere else, moron.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
It wasn't smart OR funny. It was just a cop-out. I wouldn't be making this complaint if they either just had the balls to do it out-right or avoid it completely.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
The staging was done for a fucking stop motion film! Not for a live action one, of course they had to use props, what do you suggest they use? And what the fuck, looks 2 inches deep? They looked professional and realistic in a cartoonish way. You just didn't like it because you didn't know the director and because it wasn't main stream. Grow some fucking culture, asshole.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"The staging was done for a fucking stop motion film!"
Which is why it needs to work harder to make it look more spacious than it really is.
"They looked professional and realistic"
It can't look professional, realistic, AND homemade at the same time.
"You just didn't like it because you didn't know the director"
Why should I have to know a director first (mainstream or not) to enjoy his movies?
'Asshole', 'fucking loser'... Yes, I'M the one who needs to learn some culture. ;P *lmao*
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
What ARE you talking about? The staging looked as if it was shot out in actual houses! I'd very much like to see you make a fucking better movie set, since you are obviously so skilled, sir.
Why can't it look professional, realistic and homemade at the same time? It was homemade, done by professionals, and realistic because of the use of real costumes made by professional tailors and actual hair on the puppets.
You didn't enjoy it because it was not the norm. You're a total poser.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"I'd very much like to see you make a fucking better movie set"
I don't have to. We've already seen PLENTY of stop motion films that create the illusion of space that this one failed to make.
"Why can't it look professional, realistic and homemade at the same time?"
Because they're contradictions of terms. Something that looks homemade does NOT look profession.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Okay, well if you're going to go ahead and deny that they look realistic, then I can hardly win, can I? "The sky is blue." "No it's not, no it's not."
And no, they're not contradictions. Want to know why?
Professional- It was made by professionals. Simple.
Realistic- It was made with real hair and real tiny costumes.
Homemade- It looks quaint, as though for every dollar they spend, it looks like 5 dollars they didn't spend. Idiot!
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
The Corpse Bride looks like it was done by professionals. THIS looks like some student project made out of whatever he could find in his garage.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Weird, because the puppets in this movie were made by the same people as in Corpse Bride. Also, has it even even occurred to you that there are different styles of directing, puppeteering, and directing? Of course not. You're too close-minded.
It is also worth it to point out how you defend Tim Burton, who (while I have nothing but respect for him) designs characters with ludicrously sized proportions, yet you say that this movie isn't realistic? This movie is incredibly real looking.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
You said directing twice. And yes, there are different styles of directing. Since when does that mean it's okay to make it look slapped together?
I say that the realism you're trying to prove here is betrayed by its desire to look homemade. Unrealistic though Burton's aesthetic often is, at least it's polished.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Yeah, I meant to put architecture (doing the scenery). I never said it's ok to look slapped together. But now you seem to agree with me, albeit to bitch about it looking slapped together, which it kind of does. And you know what? It looks perfect, and I wouldn't change a damn thing about it. I KNOW for a fact it was professional, it sure as hell looks realistic, and definitely homemade. It looks awesome, so fuck you.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
So we're in agreement that it looks slapped together. How then do you insist on its looking professional/realistic when looking slapped together is the antithesis of those ideals? It's only one or the other.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
No it is not! This movie is a perfect example of how it can be all three. It was supposed to look realistic and homemade, yet professional. You won't see a movie like this from your 7th grade classroom. It looked all 3! I don't understand how you're not getting this!
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
Except for their intricately constructed heads (which begs the question of why they didn't go all out with the REST of their anatomy), the puppets in this movie looked like they were made of pipecleaners with fur wrapped around them. That's NOT professional-looking.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
No they didn't! And aside from which, the head is the only part of the body you can see on the characters! How the hell do you know if they're constructed shoddily or not? Now you're really just fishing for things that MIGHT be wrong with the film, but they aren't necessarily. Kind of a nagging bith, aren't you?
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"the head is the only part of the body you can see on the characters!"
That's not true, but it's easy to see how you'd think so with the movie's ridiculous indulgence of extreme close-ups.
"How the hell do you know if they're constructed shoddily or not?"
I don't know for sure, but their apparent lack of defined joints looks like they weren't built well at all.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The close-ups, that's Wes Anderson's style, you can easily see that if you had seen any other of his movies to judge him by.
Wrong, like I said, made by the same people as Corpse Bride, so contradict yourself if you want to, I suppose.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"that's Wes Anderson's style, you can easily see that if you had seen any other of his movies to judge him by."
Thanks for the warning. ;P
"so contradict yourself if you want to, I suppose."
How does the fabricators' involvement with Corpse Bride contradict what I'm saying?
"I like how you didn't answer my question for your first and third statements."
Which question was that now? (Like you're one to talk.)
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well, did it ever cross your mind that maybe that was done on purpose?
the heads were the most important part, they display express almost 90% of the character.
and Wes Anderson does just about everything in his movies on purpose. Just understand that it's intentional, and see the reasoning behind it.
strokesfan1107 1 year ago
The puppets took very long to make and everything about them was hand crafted and done on purpose. If they wanted to make everything look more realistic, they would have. It is just the feel of the movie. Watch the featurettes about the movie on the FoxSearchlight YouTube channel. Also, I'd like to see YOU make a stop-motion film better than this. Dude, I honestly don't understand why you don't get this movie.
Sorry for intruding on the arguement but I really wanted to say something.
Beckaaahhh 1 year ago
I don't have to make a better stop motion movie; we've already got folks like Henry Selick, Tim Burton, and Nick Park who are constantly raising the visual bar. Why is it the superior strategy to intentionally make it look as bad as this?
I don't get this movie because it's doing all the same faux paus that OTHER animated films would get all kinds of flack for, but people seem to be interpreting it as something brilliant just because it has Wes Anderson's name on it.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
So you're basically saying they can't make a film that is visually different. Just because other filmmakers "raise the visual bar" doesn't mean one has to conform to the same style to be better. The movie is liked because the puppets aren't like Tim Burton's. The high texture gives this movie its unique quality and feel. They used close-ups to show you that. While the plot may not be brilliantly unique, the way it is performed makes it so. But I guess not everyone sees it that way.
Beckaaahhh 1 year ago
There's a difference between looking visually different and de-evolving the medium.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
I agree. There is a difference. However, in my and plenty of other people's opinions, that was not the case with this film. I'm sorry you fail to agree.
Beckaaahhh 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux
This wasn't praised because of Wes Anderson's name. It was praised because it was a brilliant film with incredible animation, has a deep message with an easy to follow story, a great classic soundtrack that fit the film perfectly, terrific voice and sound work, and has some undeniably funny humor. *That's* why this film is highly praised.
Look as bad as what? This is the best-looking stop-motion film to have ever been released. No other stop-motion comes close. Not even by a mile.
skppy1225 1 year ago
The animation was lousy, there was no message (if there was, do correct me), the music was forgettable, all the voice talent was pure marquee value, and I can't recall laughing ONCE at the 'humor' in this.
If you think THIS is the best-looking stop motion film ever released, you literally have no idea what you're talking about.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux This animation was FAR better than anything Burton has ever done. His characters look like he just bought some Play-Doh and constructed a model. No message? How about understanding that we're not always who we think we are? I happened to be laughing the entire movie. Shame there were no poop and dick jokes to amuse you.
If you think Tim Burton is the god of filmmaking, you really, REALLY need to get out of your emo phase and watch some real films.
skppy1225 1 year ago
Uh-huh... Way to discourage my assertion that you don't know what you're talking about. ;P
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux 1) If there's anyone who doesn't know what they're talking about, it's you.
2) You couldn't even come up with a rebuttal for my statement, because you know I'm correct.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"This animation was FAR better than anything Burton has ever done."
No it's not.
"His characters look like he just bought some Play-Doh and constructed a model."
No they don't. They look like professionally created models as opposed to pipe-cleaners with fur wrapped around them.
"How about understanding that we're not always who we think we are?"
The movie starts and ends with Fox doing exactly what he was in the beginning. Sounds like he understands himself perfectly.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"Shame there were no poop and dick jokes to amuse you."
Where did I ever indicate that I laugh at popp/dick jokes?
"If you think Tim Burton is the god of filmmaking, you really, REALLY need to get out of your emo phase and watch some real films."
I never said Burton was the god of filmmaking, I'm not emo, and I've seen plenty of "real" films which blow THIS movie completely out of the water.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Comment removed
skppy1225 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Oh, I'm sorry, I guess you're a fart joke kind of person. My bad.
Name some of these films that completely 'blow this film out of the water' because I sure as hell can't do it.
And, yes, the way you defend him, you'd swear he was the king of directors. And he's far from it, especially with the way he murdered Willy Wonka and Alice.
skppy1225 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Yes, it is.
The puppets cost an average of $80,000 per character. Where can you buy $80,000 pipe cleaners? Nowhere.
While he's still stealing food at the end of the film, this is merely a temporary food source until a more permanent one can be found. You obviously weren't paying attention to the monologue he gives where he admits to himself that, through connecting with his animal instincts, he screwed everything up. He understands that his wild side got the best of him.
skppy1225 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Name some of these films that completely 'blow this film out of the water' because I sure as hell can't do it."
And you're telling ME to watch some real films? ;P But first, are we talking about ANY films that surpass this, or simply animation?
"And, yes, the way you defend him, you'd swear he was the king of directors."
I defend whom you attack. Had you done the same with Henry Selick and Nick Park, I'd do the same with them as well.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"..especially with the way he murdered Willy Wonka and Alice."
A couple of quick calculations show that the average IMDB rating of any Anderson movie is 7.4, while this "muderer" of whom you speak ranks in at 7.3. Who knew that the difference between the rank of murderer and god (if defense = worship, according to you) is only 0.1 on a scale of 1 to 10?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Yes, because IMDB is just *so* accurate. The users there don't favor anything at all. /s
IMDB is quite possibly the absolute worst site to visit for user reviews. It's awesome for information and trivia, but the users are extremely biased.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"Yes, because IMDB is just *so* accurate. The users there don't favor anything at all. /s"
And what IS so accurate that you'll believe it? A youtube video giving the movie a 91% rating?
"but the users are extremely biased."
And I suppose saying that NOTHING out there can top this movie is fair and unbiased?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux There is nothing out there so accurate that I will believe it.
It's called an opinion. I guess if you're favorite movie doesn't blow anything else out of the water, you're biased towards that, too. Maybe one day, something will top this movie in my opinion. But right now cinema has yet to do that.
Plus, not to mention Disaster Movie was #1 on IMDB's Bottom 100 before it was even released because all of the users rated it a 1 without even seeing it. Proof on how unbiased the site is.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"It looks incredibly well-done, yet still has that 'homemade' feel that Wes was aiming for with the animation."
You can't make something look homemade and incredibly well-done at the same time. They cancel each other out.
"The point to not ending the film with them finding a more permanent food source is to leave it open for viewer interpretation."
Only so long as the viewer interprets it as a piece of pure gold just like everyone else is expected to?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux That statement is completely false.
That's the purpose... it's your way of interpreting what will happen next. What will happen when the farmers eventually discover the raid? It's up to you to decide.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"It's called anthropomorphism and it's a literary device that has been around for hundreds of years."
Fully aware of that. But when you're living an otherwise human lifestyle, you're not in much of a position to go around saying you're a 'wild animal'.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Why? Aren't humans classified under Kingdom Animalia? Yes, we are. We're all animals.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"Why? Aren't humans classified under Kingdom Animalia? Yes, we are. We're all animals."
Tell you what; next time you make a bad decision or mess up royal, try blaming it on your wild animal nature. Tell me how that all works out for you.
"Maybe one day, something will top this movie in my opinion. But right now cinema has yet to do that."
...Wow. You're actually saying that this is the PINNACLE of not just animation, but cinema as a WHOLE? :S
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux I won't blame it on my animal nature, but I'll certainly blame it on not understanding who I am. Maybe I think I'm destined to be wild and crazy, and I'm not.
And yes, this film just happens to be my favorite film of all time. People have different opinions, you know. Oh wait, you're head is so far up your ass that you didn't know that.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"not to mention Disaster Movie was #1 on IMDB's Bottom 100 before it was even released because all of the users rated it a 1 without even seeing it."
How did you determine that stat?
"That statement is completely false."
Which statement?
"What will happen when the farmers eventually discover the raid? It's up to you to decide."
Most films that end without wrapping up the final act are viewed as being poorly conceived and/or executed.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux I know that by having been a regular visitor at that site for about 6 years and happened to just ponder on the boards to see what everyone was thinking about the movie. It wasn't even released and was already #1 in the bottom 100.
The statement that being homemade completely cancels out being professional. It doesn't.
I guess that all good movies have to completely wrap up the ending?
skppy1225 1 year ago
"Yeah, and you didn't just pull *that* above comment out of nowhere, I suppose."
Nope. It's not pulled out of nowhere, but based on what's been previously stated (and, of course, I need to explain this to the person who stated it in the first place). Conversely, when have I ever stated that I didn't laugh at this movie because it didn't have any poop/dick/fart jokes?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Yeah, it was pulled out of nowhere.
Alright, you got me here. Big fucking deal.
Why come and comment on this video when you didn't like the movie in the first place? Don't give me that typical 'I have a freedom of speech' garbage. I already know that you do.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"Why come and comment on this video when you didn't like the movie in the first place? Don't give me that typical 'I have a freedom of speech' garbage. I already know that you do"
'Garbage', huh? ;P
I originally commented on this video because I was seeking some sort of clarity. I couldn't understand why this movie is loved the way it is when it does everything that so many other movies would be criticized for.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Yes, considering that's what assholes like you say every time they start a fucking flame war.
This film was praised because it deserved it. Top-notch animation, all-star voice acting, clever, witty humor, a great, upbeat soundtrack, intricate detail, an easy to follow storyline, and amusing characters. That's why it was praised.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"Yes, considering that's what assholes like you say every time they start a fucking flame war."
Once again, way to disprove my theory that you don't know what you're talking about. ;P I didn't start this flame war, and I'm not the one calling people assholes.
"Top-notch animation"
They intentionally made the animation look primitive.
"all-star voice acting"
It has TOO MUCH all-star voice acting, like 'Robots'.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Are you new to the Internet? Either you are, or you lack common sense: when you post something negative to get a angered response, it's called flaming. I simply countered you're arguments and you blew it out of proportion.
Alright, then if this animation is so primitive and so unprofessional, go buy a Nikon D3, construct all of the models, props, and sets, and re-shoot the entire movie. After all, it's homemade and unprofessional! /s
And the voice acting was perfect.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"you lack common sense"
Says the guy insulting my sense of humor with NOTHING to base said insults on...
"when you post something negative to get a angered response, it's called flaming."
Ah, I see. And you calling me an asshole is a fine example of NOT flaming, yes? Who said my original comment was written for the sake of angering?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Seriously? When you come on here and post a negative comment, you know you're going to get slammed for it. This is the Internet. It's an all-out flame war between people, sometimes even between people who like said topic.
And yes, I've seen the latter before. =P
skppy1225 1 year ago
"Judging by the way the 360 looks... I'd say the other ones."
You know, I didn't look at those when you first mentioned them. Now that I do, I gotta say, those all look pretty slick. So then if it's possible for something homemade to look professional, what's so wrong with making this professionally made movie look professional instead of looking simplistically homemade?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"When you come on here and post a negative comment, you know you're going to get slammed for it."
Is that why everyone says nothing but good things about this movie? Because they're afraid of getting slammed by the masses?
"And yes, I've seen the latter before. =P"
What latter?
"This movie was protected because that was how the novel was originally intended to end."
If you had originally pointed that out to begin with, that would have been so much easier.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"I simply countered you're arguments and you blew it out of proportion."
Simply countering my arguments would have been fine, if you intended on STAYING on that route.
"After all, it's homemade and unprofessional!"
And that's supposed to prove... what?
"Your head is up your fucking ass because you don't know how to respect others' opinions"
Like you're one to talk?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"if you respected my opinions I would respect yours, too."
Pure bullshit. I said I didn't laugh at this movie's humor, and you immediately assumed it was because I only laugh at toilet humor.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"I love how someone is flagging all of your comments as spam, certainly isn't me."
Actually I can't even tell, thanks to this new stupid youtube format. >;( And what exactly was the purpose of you pointing that out? It's not like this video is attracting hundreds of viewers/commenters a day. If I'm getting so many flags, OF COURSE it's coming from the person disagreeing with me. Are YOU new to the internet or something?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"They're all homemade and blow the 'professional' 360 out of the water."
That's not what I asked. Which one LOOKS like it has the most thought and execution put into it?
"Yeah, because every movie that has an ending that wasn't wrapped up was a cop-out."
No, saying that not all good movies have to wrap up nicely like every OTHER movie has to is a cop-out. '9' had a bit of a strange, open ending to it and got criticized for it. What's protecting THIS movie from such a criticism?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux Judging by the way the 360 looks... I'd say the other ones.
This movie was protected because that was how the novel was originally intended to end. The ending for the novel was far more of a cop-out. It ended with the farmers just sitting there by the manhole, waiting for the animals - the supermarket was scrapped by Dahl. Wes knew he needed to find a new ending and stumbled upon the supermarket. It was protected by remaining faithful to the novel, yet adding a new element.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"You're so smart, where do you get all of this knowledge?!"
College, film companions, DVD commentaries, reviews of other movies by both critics AND viewers... You'd be amazed at what a little research can do.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
"The statement that being homemade completely cancels out being professional. It doesn't."
Which structure would you think had the most obvious thought, manpower, and resources behind it; a shack in Mexico made out of scraps of wood and whatever is available, or the Chrysler Building?
"I guess that all good movies have to completely wrap up the ending?"
Cop-out.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux The XBox 360 had a lot of thought, manpower, and resources behind it and there are tons of homemade gaming projects that outperform it in terms of reliability. Look at the Wireless Game Gun, the NES Coffee Table, the Nintoaster and Super Nintoaster, and the Super Genintari. They're all homemade and blow the 'professional' 360 out of the water.
Yeah, because every movie that has an ending that wasn't wrapped up was a cop-out. You're so smart, where do you get all of this knowledge?! /s
skppy1225 1 year ago
"I won't blame it on my animal nature, but I'll certainly blame it on not understanding who I am."
Wild animals don't think about existentiality. They're too busy focusing on how to get their next meal.
"People have different opinions, you know. Oh wait, you're head is so far up your ass that you didn't know that."
Yep. People have different opinions....... but God help ANYONE who doesn't like this greatest movie ever, because they have their heads up their asses if they don't!
Nice. ;P
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux I didn't say your head is up your ass because you disagree with me, now did I? Your head is up your fucking ass because you don't know how to respect others' opinions, and you proved it with your 'you thought this was the best film of all time' comment. Well, yeah, I did think that, and if you respected my opinions I would respect yours, too. But you don't, and therefore your head is crammed up your ass.
I love how someone is flagging all of your comments as spam, certainly isn't me.
skppy1225 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The puppets cost an average of $80,000 per character."
What a waste. <;P What's the point in spending so much only to intentionally make it look cheap?
"this is merely a temporary food source until a more permanent one can be found."
Why didn't the movie end with them FINDING a more permanent food source? Returning to the same dangerous status quo that got the whole conflict started to begin with isn't something to celebrate.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux They didn't look cheap. It looks incredibly well-done, yet still has that 'homemade' feel that Wes was aiming for with the animation.
The point to not ending the film with them finding a more permanent food source is to leave it open for viewer interpretation. What will happen tomorrow when the farmers discover the raid? It's up to you to decide. They're celebrating over the fact that Felicity is pregnant, not the abundant food source.
skppy1225 1 year ago
"through connecting with his animal instincts, he screwed everything up."
What kind of wild animal wears clothes and writes a newspaper column anyway?
"Oh, I'm sorry, I guess you're a fart joke kind of person. My bad."
And where did I say that I'm a fart joke kind of person? At least TRY to prove you know what you're talking about instead of pulling things from out of nowhere.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
@Bobzeaux It's called anthropomorphism and it's a literary device that has been around for hundreds of years.
Yeah, and you didn't just pull *that* above comment out of nowhere, I suppose.
skppy1225 1 year ago
So yes, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
You know I'd argue but I have nothing negative to say about this movie. I saw it for myself and thought it was just great. =]
ultimatelionhearttv 1 year ago
And what does me calling you out for what you really are have to do with me having any culture? I know for a fact that I have better taste in music, movies and books than you, dude.
It is also worth it to say that you also called me a loser and such... filthy hypocrite.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"I know for a fact that I have better taste in music, movies and books than you, dude."
If that point (which is neither accurate or based on anything discussed here) were true, you'd be able to better defend this movie simply by answering my questions instead of engaging in verbal attacks.
"It is also worth it to say that you also called me a loser and such... filthy hypocrite."
Per YOUR argument, how does calling you out for what you really are make me a hypocrite? ;P
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
I have been able to defend this movie, simply by answering your questions. You have been able to dodge and avoid them rather well, nonetheless.
That's my point. You point out that I have called you an asshole, and yet you call me names, also. That is how you are a hypocrite.
Wait, perhaps you don't know what that means; forgive me. Anyone as feeble-minded as yourself couldn't possibly understand. A hypocrite is someone who calls someone out for something, yet does it themselves.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
I have answered every single one of your rebuttals with one of my own. You, answer SOME of my rebuttals, presumably when you realize I'm right. And also, if all I've been doing is insulting, why has this argument gone on so long, and why do you still argue with me?
I answer every question with an insult. I'm proud of pointing out you're retarded. Also, nice contradiction. You say I don't answer any questions, but later in the same comment, I answer questions, albeit with an insult or two.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
Only the mutual fabricators of Corpse Bride and Mr. Fox is the ONE point you've proven right. Kudos. Other than that, you've been doing nothing but insulting me based on absolutely nothing. Where have I ever expressed my disdain for this movie deriving from its lack of action scenes, Megan Fox or special effects? If you're going to insult someone, at least have it make sense.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Bullshit. You've managed to avoid the question, how exactly has the argument gone on so long and touched so many points if all I'm doing is blindly throwing swear words and names. And thanks, I did point that out, but don't you fucking forget how little you've pointed out. I think that would be a perfect 0 to my one.
Also, funny how you just fell on your own sword, there. Me insulting you with Megan Fox and special FX? I was implying you were stupid,and you are so stupid you didn't get it.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
The argument has gone on for so long because I'm determined to find out why this movie is what it is and why it's so well-recieved. You're briefly touching on points and then you just turn it into more and more insults. I've pointed out A LOT of things that other less-known directors would get flamed for, and you haven't been able to answer why we're just supposed to accept it for THIS movie.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
This movie is well received for it's humor, excellent plot, and wonderful animation. Simple, moron. If you don't like it, I believe that SpongeBob is on TV right now, and you're missing it.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
At least Sponge Bob looks better than this.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, then by all means go fucking bitch about that! Honestly, you would be that fucking guy that is bitching about how awful this movie is, then turns around and watches SpongeBob all day. Are you seriously that needy for attention, negative or otherwise?
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"I was implying you were stupid,and you are so stupid you didn't get it."
So.... I mention that you implied insulting me with that special effects/Megan Fox thing, and you think that I somehow MISS that implication? How does THAT make sense?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
Wrong. You clearly didn't understand that I was calling you stupid. You bitched that you didn't understand what it meant. Don't act like you knew what it meant all along when you just got through asking what it meant.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
If I didn't know what it meant, why would I list it as one of your many insults/non-answers?
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Haha! Because you didn't and just made that up just now, perhaps?
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
...Because I didn't and I just made it up? Are you REALLY that desperate for straws to grasp on? ;(
"you would be that fucking guy that is bitching about how awful this movie is, then turns around and watches SpongeBob all day."
BOTH of them suck. Sponge Bob is just the better-looking of the two.
"Are you seriously that needy for attention, negative or otherwise?"
I could easily pose you the same question.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
I like how you didn't answer my question for your first and third statements.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"A hypocrite is someone who calls someone out for something, yet does it themselves."
Uh-huh. And I suppose you're going to sit there with a straight face and say that you're NOT one in spite of your very first comment calling me a "fucking loser" for nothing more than disliking this movie? ;P
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
I never called you out for insulting me. We're not talking about how many times I've insulted you, I'm saying that you're fucking retarded if you're going to go all defensive about me calling you shit while you do it yourself. At least I have the guts to admit it.
And no, I call you a fucking loser because you point out things wrong with the movie that aren't in fact wrong with it!
It's akin to disliking someone because they're black, when in fact they are white.
Also, you're an idiot.
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
"We're not talking about how many times I've insulted you"
No. You'd just rather insist on giving me more to work with. Of course I'm going to get defensive after that. THINK before you say.
"you point out things wrong with the movie that aren't in fact wrong with it!"
Tell me what's so right about everything I pointed out then.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
OK, what? More to work with"? What the fuck are you talking about? Oh, wait, you sound awful smart when you give me advice. Lol, making no sense yet wanting to come out on top.
"Tell me what's so right about everything I pointed out then."
What?! That's all I have been doing! It's basically like I tell you for 3 straight days my favorite color is green, then when I'm done, you ask me what my favorite color is. God, all I've been doing is proving you wrong about this movie, fucking moron!
jaredjeremyshow 1 year ago
Try again, loser.
Bobzeaux 1 year ago
I LOVE THIS MOVIE!!!
pandurang81 1 year ago 4
this movie is the greatest thing i have ever seen
Nattyboy100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch this Movie online at W W W . TV-Video . us
angwinbecknn 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Current TV is an independent media company led by former U.S. Vice President Al Gore.
Ever feel like you are being propagated???
wastedaga1n 2 years ago
was my fav book ;]
tomtommyx 2 years ago 2
saw this movie instead of 2012. i won't lie, this movie is epic
adikhan1212 2 years ago 22
@adikhan1212 I agree. The destruction of major cities and national landmarks looked magnificent.
Tigerman9001 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well I'm pretty sure they've destroyed my favourite childhood book
RyuSparkly 2 years ago
i'm mos def gonna watch this its freakin' george clooney
CUMALIOUS 2 years ago 2
i thought this movie was going to be stupid but 91%? it must be good!
JAFSvideos 2 years ago
dam im so seeing this
imninja45 2 years ago 2
you sure? I read it about... 5 years ago I believe and there were 3 farmers. One who lived on apple cider, one who bred chickens and this 2nd guy whom I can't remember what made him so unique.
SulleDodger 2 years ago
ill see this...i bet its better then the movie version of where the wild things are. seriously tht movie was so fucked up o.o
simpsongiirl1011 2 years ago
I'd see this... with my nephews.
OpCzar 2 years ago
Vuk or The Little Fox (Hungarian animated movie, amazingly lovely story) is kinda what I thought when I heard Fantastic Mr Fox was going to be animated.
Anthropomorphizing George Clooney was prolly not what I expected...
It's prolly a good movie in it's own right, but imo, it's not Fantastic Mr Fox. That story was about real foxes (granted, talking foxes on two legs) doing what real foxes do, only smarter. Not about the same animals running a cricket team.
Elementroar 2 years ago
I kinda preferred it if it wasn't anthropomorphic. You don't need them to act human to make a good movie, especially since the book was about real foxes (that talk, granted) doing what real foxes do - steal easy prey to live.
And having George Clooney's distinctive voice there, yeah, it just pulls away from the movie.
Elementroar 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
6th post
rustyrob24 2 years ago
wow. I need to see this...
ShurikenRain3 2 years ago
Seriously, I swear to God, hollywood is trying to find every single book from my childhood and turn it into some piss poor movie.
angelmarine1292 2 years ago
I can't be comfortable watching a movie like this anymore. Furries have ruined everything for me.
darkbutterfree 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
damnit man i was gonna go see it then i read your comment damn furries lol
nickrulez809765 2 years ago
furries r ossim stfu fgt
trombonefellow 2 years ago
@trombonefellow speak in English kid
fakespotter 2 years ago
i spoke 2 ur mom in englsh btch! >:D
trombonefellow 2 years ago
@trombonefellow oh my goodness a mom joke :o its soo authentic
fakespotter 2 years ago
@trombonefellow holy shit man
what kind of language is that
ViviiGoRAWR 2 years ago
taek ur @ bullsht bask to /twitter/
trombonefellow 2 years ago
@trombonefellow that took me fucking like 5 minutes to understand
wow
ViviiGoRAWR 2 years ago
lol it's cuz ur retarded
trombonefellow 2 years ago
@trombonefellow nahhh
its cuz you type like a 6th grader
ViviiGoRAWR 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
u still need to taek ur @ bullsht bask to /twitter/, dis iz utube fag
trombonefellow 2 years ago
learn to spell, dumb ass
Xelief 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i lurned ur mom asshole
trombonefellow 2 years ago
hes an obvious troll.
grimmviral 2 years ago
@trombonefellow i don't get the twitter thing
ViviiGoRAWR 2 years ago
agreed
thekornbob 2 years ago 2
shut up trombone alot of furries are on youtube
DIGITALPH33RFAN123 2 years ago 3
Damn straight.
vanman96 2 years ago 2
Looks good
ace198 2 years ago 2