They have destroyed the sanctity of marriage with this no fault divorce garbage. Due to the pressure of 3rd wave feminism pushing this law along and many of us men now refusing to marry and have children...the family structure in America is now dying. This country is sinking faster than the Titanic.
It is absolutely tragic that our family laws do not protect the innocents and their children. Wealthy people are not greatly affected by the No-Fault Divorce Law. However, the common people do suffer under such a law. What good has this law created other than raising the divorce rate in our country? Families are hurting even more with the family courts involvement over the years. So why are our 50 states embracing this law?? Some one has to speak up against current situation. Good Job!
I really didn't do much to put together a "persona" when I did this--no special make-up or costume or fictitious/humorous name. I wonder if anyone has any suggestions? I'm considering doing one for family court mediators (who may get fired if they try to save marriages and their job is to get the faithful to surrender everything "voluntarily" so they'll be seen "cooperative" and things will go easier for them." Then one for family court attorneys so in the end nobody escapes unscathed :-)
Most people do not like divorce, but they cite what I call One-thousands-and-one excuses and reasons for why they divorced. If the parties involved understand that it is by design Genetically first relations is permanent. I expect that families would spend more time educating children how to choose and how to make it work. Couple if they have problems would not push one another's bottons, which I believe because they desire someone else outside and want to blame on the other or excuse their own.
@danieljdick It will take sacrifices to make changes, but without it it leads to further trouble. Exactly as you outlined in your video it is based on greed. So, I noticed that having two separate families increase business for 2 separate cars, furniture, entertainments, TV sets, rents, gas use, electricity use, beauty surgeries, a market for hotels, luring cloths, expensive jewlery, perfumes etc to attract and lure others (married & single) where in a family, such are not necessary or needed
@danieljdick In fact, young children must be taught this concept early on. I did not focus in my book about scaring others by disease statistics and threat of death as I noticed that is not as important because everyone must die eventually. I also believe if something is not logically understood well, it becomes as a set of rules and opinions and my opinion or wishes can not be better or more accurate than others. There is truth or logic and that must be the point of reference not opinions.
@danieljdick I am not sure where you are leading. I have written 2 books my first is completely using logic and some science unknowing what would the outcome be trying to answer a question "What is the Ultimate Goal Of Life" not as one wish and like, but as it is designed and whatever it leads me, I followed. Then I investigated whether the result can be supported religiously mainly within the Jodeo-Christian Bible and yes when properly interpreted leads to same. So verbal & non-verbal agreed.
@danieljdick I did not write about what I like or wish or feel right, but as what is the design intension from all this. I concluded using logic alone same as religion when the religion is properly interpreted. In fact, I find that Morality can not be separated from Logic, rather both must agree. In fact logic is espicially important to agree, but not always all the knowledge is discovered to understand. So, Religion is few steps ahead, but logic is there and just behind it.
I concluded that first relation between a man and woman permanently alters part of their Genetic Code. Thus, subsequent relation outside the first creates addiction. My one advice if anyone would think they can change this disease that attacked the family is never ever date or have relation with a divorced, married or a parent. This ruins it for the children and all of us. No fault divorce is contrary to nature design. You can read my book The Ultimate Goal Of Life: Sacred Genetic Code Theory.
The divorce industry is a new low in our society, but for some reason doesn't receive the attention it deserves. No-Fault laws have been a nightmare for the institution of marriage, but most of all it is a nightmare for the kids. Nobody is against divorce in the cases of abuse or adultry, but that just isn't the what happens in most divorces. It is truly depressing to see what our legal system has let happen to families.
I agree with you totally except that these folks take it one step further. The treachery is not caused by no fault but by the conversion of no fault from a bilateral to a unilateral no fault divorce. What this means is unilateral does not require the spouses to be in agreement for a divorce to be called "no fault". It's like a murderer saying, "I'm innocent" and everyone being required to agree without question. Judges become pimps for the wayward spouses robbing the faithful to pay the bill
@danieljdick It is much more than that. It is a multi attack subtle and began indirect luring and manipulating the people to change thinking from logic to "Feel good, have fun, desires, life is shor do as you please, you are a creator of life, financial success is most important, liberty, freedom of choice, privacy etc." once that was accepted by more people, truth and logic became anything one wishes or make of it. So, a person become consumer with predictable choices yet believe personal
@bubburubb I look at problems such as divorce in medical terms and see it as "Contagious Disease". So, suggested solutions are nice, but resembles allopathic medicine for chronic disease all they do is target the symptoms for example hypertension, hyperglycemia, high cholesterol or fever has pills to lower them. However, none addressed the root cause of why such elevations and not repaired. Soon side effects even to the treatments itself causing other problems like kidney failur, liver disease..
@bubburubb "it is truly depressing to see what our legal system has let happen to families".. Wait, what? You blame the legal system for the trashy american culture. Talk about dodging responsibility. The legal system has become more liberal and sensitiv to what people want, freedom. You statement is typical coming from a religious view. You need laws to control what you can and can´t do. An independant, grown adult should not need a reason to leave a marriage other than what he/she wants.
@2011Brov You said, "An independant, grown adult should not need a reason to leave a marriage other than what he/she wants." and you say, "You statement is typical coming from a religious view. You need laws to control what you can and can´t do."
The right to marry is the right to bind oneself, to take an act of courage and sincerity, to make a promise that is to be honored. And you seem to demand everyone be deprived of this right so you can play the whore on your promises. Not good.
@danieljdick Brov, do you believe citizens should should have the right to enter into a legitimately binding marriage covenant that is as binding as it pretends to be? Or do you feel that everyone should be forced into a swindle and a lie that only pretends to be binding?
Would you tell your wife on your wedding day, "Honey, marry me, but I don't have the spine to back up my promises, so if I feel like splitting, well, hey, that's my right"? Would you tell your daughter's husband that's OK?
@danieljdick Brov, what does marriage mean to you? Is it a promise or not? What does it mean? If it's to stay together for as long as you feel like it, then what is the point in calling it a marriage? Have you read the common wedding vows? Or is it that you're concerned it's "religious" and therefore should not be allowed? Do you feel religious people should not be allowed to marry? Or that only atheists get to decide the terms of that marriage? Why are you bashing freedom and religion?
@danieljdick I do not demand anything. I believe in personal freedom, like you believe in an old, gender discriminating and contradictory fictional story ( the bibel).
You had no reasonable argument to my previous comment, therefore you analyse me and claim that I demand something.
"Not good."? You are the irrational christian who wants to forbid personal freedom, and I am "not good"?
Why don't you learn to argue your views and reply to my previous comment again, christian.
@2011Brov You're really full of all kinds of lies and bigotry, aren't you? You're demanding "personal freedom" to make "Holy" vows of faithfulness through adversity 'til death do us part, to play the whore on those vows, and make your spouse and children pay dearly for your crimes against them. You call the "Bibel (sp?)" "contradictory" because you're too lazy to understand what it's saying, and you're saying because you're not religious nobody else can "bind" themselves with legitimate vows.
@danieljdick The right to marry is the right to bind oneself. It's the right to express one's sincerity of love. It's the right to say, "I will not deprive you and our children of your right to live together in love in the family home without abuse, without robbery. I will protect you and defend you and do my best to make your life better." The right to cheat on that vow is the right to swindle. It is the right to abuse, to deprive another person of what's mos
@danieljdick Even if the Bible never existed, the sheer ethics and morality of any person with any common decency or common sense would have to say it is vile and reprehensible and cowardly to demand such a right to violate one's family this way and to be rewarded for doing so, to make a promise as solemn as one can possibly make, to appeal to the judgment of a God and society and to put one's family honor behind it to obtain a relationship that would otherwise be refused.
@danieljdick If one were to force sex upon another, that would be considered rape, a reprehensible act. But, to violate one's word to God, to family, to spouse, to society, to one's children, to shred one's family through abuse and adultery, you not only rape your victims but you rape their soul, their loved ones, their God, their family honor, and you rape them continually for a major part of their lives. To demand reward for this is inexcusable. To cave to that demand is cowardice.
@danieljdick So, what is to be said about those who profiteer pimping and pandering for the unfaithful, depriving the faithful and their children of their right to live together in love enjoying the shared family home and assets, and treating the beleaguered victims of adultery and abuse as cash cows extorting from them in court and taxing them for their losses? And if there is a loving and honest God, what must He say about it?
They have destroyed the sanctity of marriage with this no fault divorce garbage. Due to the pressure of 3rd wave feminism pushing this law along and many of us men now refusing to marry and have children...the family structure in America is now dying. This country is sinking faster than the Titanic.
DeadSleepers 9 months ago
It is absolutely tragic that our family laws do not protect the innocents and their children. Wealthy people are not greatly affected by the No-Fault Divorce Law. However, the common people do suffer under such a law. What good has this law created other than raising the divorce rate in our country? Families are hurting even more with the family courts involvement over the years. So why are our 50 states embracing this law?? Some one has to speak up against current situation. Good Job!
shine4christ01 9 months ago
I really didn't do much to put together a "persona" when I did this--no special make-up or costume or fictitious/humorous name. I wonder if anyone has any suggestions? I'm considering doing one for family court mediators (who may get fired if they try to save marriages and their job is to get the faithful to surrender everything "voluntarily" so they'll be seen "cooperative" and things will go easier for them." Then one for family court attorneys so in the end nobody escapes unscathed :-)
danieljdick 1 year ago
Sad thing is, he's right on point!!!
btlfn723 1 year ago
Most people do not like divorce, but they cite what I call One-thousands-and-one excuses and reasons for why they divorced. If the parties involved understand that it is by design Genetically first relations is permanent. I expect that families would spend more time educating children how to choose and how to make it work. Couple if they have problems would not push one another's bottons, which I believe because they desire someone else outside and want to blame on the other or excuse their own.
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
@danieljdick It will take sacrifices to make changes, but without it it leads to further trouble. Exactly as you outlined in your video it is based on greed. So, I noticed that having two separate families increase business for 2 separate cars, furniture, entertainments, TV sets, rents, gas use, electricity use, beauty surgeries, a market for hotels, luring cloths, expensive jewlery, perfumes etc to attract and lure others (married & single) where in a family, such are not necessary or needed
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
@danieljdick In fact, young children must be taught this concept early on. I did not focus in my book about scaring others by disease statistics and threat of death as I noticed that is not as important because everyone must die eventually. I also believe if something is not logically understood well, it becomes as a set of rules and opinions and my opinion or wishes can not be better or more accurate than others. There is truth or logic and that must be the point of reference not opinions.
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
@danieljdick I am not sure where you are leading. I have written 2 books my first is completely using logic and some science unknowing what would the outcome be trying to answer a question "What is the Ultimate Goal Of Life" not as one wish and like, but as it is designed and whatever it leads me, I followed. Then I investigated whether the result can be supported religiously mainly within the Jodeo-Christian Bible and yes when properly interpreted leads to same. So verbal & non-verbal agreed.
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
@danieljdick I did not write about what I like or wish or feel right, but as what is the design intension from all this. I concluded using logic alone same as religion when the religion is properly interpreted. In fact, I find that Morality can not be separated from Logic, rather both must agree. In fact logic is espicially important to agree, but not always all the knowledge is discovered to understand. So, Religion is few steps ahead, but logic is there and just behind it.
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
I concluded that first relation between a man and woman permanently alters part of their Genetic Code. Thus, subsequent relation outside the first creates addiction. My one advice if anyone would think they can change this disease that attacked the family is never ever date or have relation with a divorced, married or a parent. This ruins it for the children and all of us. No fault divorce is contrary to nature design. You can read my book The Ultimate Goal Of Life: Sacred Genetic Code Theory.
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
The divorce industry is a new low in our society, but for some reason doesn't receive the attention it deserves. No-Fault laws have been a nightmare for the institution of marriage, but most of all it is a nightmare for the kids. Nobody is against divorce in the cases of abuse or adultry, but that just isn't the what happens in most divorces. It is truly depressing to see what our legal system has let happen to families.
bubburubb 2 years ago
I agree with you totally except that these folks take it one step further. The treachery is not caused by no fault but by the conversion of no fault from a bilateral to a unilateral no fault divorce. What this means is unilateral does not require the spouses to be in agreement for a divorce to be called "no fault". It's like a murderer saying, "I'm innocent" and everyone being required to agree without question. Judges become pimps for the wayward spouses robbing the faithful to pay the bill
danieljdick 2 years ago
@danieljdick It is much more than that. It is a multi attack subtle and began indirect luring and manipulating the people to change thinking from logic to "Feel good, have fun, desires, life is shor do as you please, you are a creator of life, financial success is most important, liberty, freedom of choice, privacy etc." once that was accepted by more people, truth and logic became anything one wishes or make of it. So, a person become consumer with predictable choices yet believe personal
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
@bubburubb I look at problems such as divorce in medical terms and see it as "Contagious Disease". So, suggested solutions are nice, but resembles allopathic medicine for chronic disease all they do is target the symptoms for example hypertension, hyperglycemia, high cholesterol or fever has pills to lower them. However, none addressed the root cause of why such elevations and not repaired. Soon side effects even to the treatments itself causing other problems like kidney failur, liver disease..
UltimateGoalOfLife 1 year ago
@bubburubb "it is truly depressing to see what our legal system has let happen to families".. Wait, what? You blame the legal system for the trashy american culture. Talk about dodging responsibility. The legal system has become more liberal and sensitiv to what people want, freedom. You statement is typical coming from a religious view. You need laws to control what you can and can´t do. An independant, grown adult should not need a reason to leave a marriage other than what he/she wants.
2011Brov 11 months ago
@2011Brov You said, "An independant, grown adult should not need a reason to leave a marriage other than what he/she wants." and you say, "You statement is typical coming from a religious view. You need laws to control what you can and can´t do."
The right to marry is the right to bind oneself, to take an act of courage and sincerity, to make a promise that is to be honored. And you seem to demand everyone be deprived of this right so you can play the whore on your promises. Not good.
danieljdick 11 months ago
@danieljdick Brov, do you believe citizens should should have the right to enter into a legitimately binding marriage covenant that is as binding as it pretends to be? Or do you feel that everyone should be forced into a swindle and a lie that only pretends to be binding?
Would you tell your wife on your wedding day, "Honey, marry me, but I don't have the spine to back up my promises, so if I feel like splitting, well, hey, that's my right"? Would you tell your daughter's husband that's OK?
danieljdick 11 months ago
@danieljdick Brov, what does marriage mean to you? Is it a promise or not? What does it mean? If it's to stay together for as long as you feel like it, then what is the point in calling it a marriage? Have you read the common wedding vows? Or is it that you're concerned it's "religious" and therefore should not be allowed? Do you feel religious people should not be allowed to marry? Or that only atheists get to decide the terms of that marriage? Why are you bashing freedom and religion?
danieljdick 11 months ago
@danieljdick I do not demand anything. I believe in personal freedom, like you believe in an old, gender discriminating and contradictory fictional story ( the bibel).
You had no reasonable argument to my previous comment, therefore you analyse me and claim that I demand something.
"Not good."? You are the irrational christian who wants to forbid personal freedom, and I am "not good"?
Why don't you learn to argue your views and reply to my previous comment again, christian.
2011Brov 11 months ago
@2011Brov You're really full of all kinds of lies and bigotry, aren't you? You're demanding "personal freedom" to make "Holy" vows of faithfulness through adversity 'til death do us part, to play the whore on those vows, and make your spouse and children pay dearly for your crimes against them. You call the "Bibel (sp?)" "contradictory" because you're too lazy to understand what it's saying, and you're saying because you're not religious nobody else can "bind" themselves with legitimate vows.
danieljdick 11 months ago
@danieljdick The right to marry is the right to bind oneself. It's the right to express one's sincerity of love. It's the right to say, "I will not deprive you and our children of your right to live together in love in the family home without abuse, without robbery. I will protect you and defend you and do my best to make your life better." The right to cheat on that vow is the right to swindle. It is the right to abuse, to deprive another person of what's mos
t precious in life.
danieljdick 11 months ago
@danieljdick Even if the Bible never existed, the sheer ethics and morality of any person with any common decency or common sense would have to say it is vile and reprehensible and cowardly to demand such a right to violate one's family this way and to be rewarded for doing so, to make a promise as solemn as one can possibly make, to appeal to the judgment of a God and society and to put one's family honor behind it to obtain a relationship that would otherwise be refused.
danieljdick 11 months ago
@danieljdick If one were to force sex upon another, that would be considered rape, a reprehensible act. But, to violate one's word to God, to family, to spouse, to society, to one's children, to shred one's family through abuse and adultery, you not only rape your victims but you rape their soul, their loved ones, their God, their family honor, and you rape them continually for a major part of their lives. To demand reward for this is inexcusable. To cave to that demand is cowardice.
danieljdick 11 months ago
@danieljdick So, what is to be said about those who profiteer pimping and pandering for the unfaithful, depriving the faithful and their children of their right to live together in love enjoying the shared family home and assets, and treating the beleaguered victims of adultery and abuse as cash cows extorting from them in court and taxing them for their losses? And if there is a loving and honest God, what must He say about it?
danieljdick 11 months ago