9/11: WTC-1 antenna tilting

[HedgieDiva]

The antennae= the core, no core no building understand???

[ryeb00]

If you really believe 9/11 was an inside job, you are void of critical thinking skills. You've been fooled by the people who knowingly create conspiracy propaganda to pollute weak minds with revisionist filth. The facts about 9/11 are there for the world to see. It was a catastrophic event for the whole world. Trust me, people have looked into it!

"I am the one in charge of the 19 brothers … I was responsible for entrusting the 19 brothers … with the raids." - Osama bin Laden

[Standonarock]

The empire state building had a plane fly into it in 1945 and it didn't collapse. When will Americans question/research the bull that they are fed by their slave masters. Why do they just take everything these crooks say and believe it. If I told you a guy held up a plane with a box cutter, people would laugh at me, but when the government says it and media repeats it, they worship it. Can't find the indestructible black boxes but find two perfect passports the first day. LOLLLLL biggest joke

[JadedRoy]

debunking911(dot)com

[sanluisskywatch]

This video conflicts with a number of other videos, which show a vertical drop, not a tumbling over like this video.

Of course, there was a lot of TV digital animation going on on 9/11, so this doesn't surprise me as much of what we were shown was pure Hollywood.

Watch September Clues.

[RHNL77]

@sanluisskywatch You won't be able to see the angle of the spire change if the video was shot from the north, as most were. I just checked some other videos that were shot from the sides and they all show the antenna bank to the south as the tower collapses. WTC 7 used to be north of WTC 1 (as it is today), so it is impossible that the former WTC 7 building was damaged badly by the antenna, as Larry Silverstein proclaimed.

[Sh0ckandAWE101]

The Jews did this

[thebluetarp]

dont know who is responsible but i can guaruntee terrorists were not able to plant bombs inside these buildings. it is quite clear these buildings were blown apart from the inside out. you can see pieces of steel being flung 100's of feet in the air. a simple collapse would NOT do that. and building 7....come on!! if that is not a demolition i will eat my sweaty gym socks for breakfast.

[fjh1616]

@Hotters70602 Ouch. Chill out, man.

[thelisreal]

it's actually called the antenna topple

[ruzziduzzi]

@Hotters70602 Do you want to tell us how this 16 seconds of collapsing wtc tower is only 9 seconds, like your dumb fuck inbred brother? If not dont forget to tell him HE DUMBER THAN A BOX OF ROCKS

[ruzziduzzi]

@Hotters70602 Hey just cuz u and ur DUMBFUCK BROTHERS parents are Aunt mom and Uncle dad, dont come crying to me.

[ruzziduzzi]

@SuperZero67341 I think im talking to a braindead dipshit who cant think. Please explain this 16 second video of collapse, its NOT 9.2. PERIOD Watch some more TWOOFER VIDS, then go sit in the corner, AND DONT PLAY WITH SHARP OBJECTS. NEXT!

[ruzziduzzi]

you wld think this zuperzero guy wld just DROP THIS TALK ABOUT A 9.2 SEC COLLAPSE when this video here is 16 seconds long, NOTHING BUT COLLAPSE FOR 16 seconds, and even missing the initial and final parts of the fall. Oh i know why he cant drop 9.2, cuz if its not 9.2 IT WASNT A FREE FALL, AND WASNT DEMOLISHED IN SOME KOOKY PLOT, and its thats the case THEN IT MEANS HES UTTERLY WRONG, so i understand the denial, but u shld get over superZ, and move on with ur life and take up a REAL CAUSE

[ruzziduzzi]

@Superhero67341 You are MEGA RETARD. hopefully u learn ur lesson for POSTING LIES THAT PPL CAN PROVE WITH THE PUSH OF A BUTTON. @EVERYONE reading, this asstard here (just read below) keeps insisting the towers fell at free fall speed, which mathematically is 9.2 seconds for the known height of said towers. WELL JUST PRESS STOP ON THE VID RIGHT HERE AT 10 SECONDS. Notice theres still 40-50 stories of WTC tower left? Well theres still 6 mores secs of collapse after that, 9 seconds MY ASS! Debunked

[ruzziduzzi]

@SuperZero67341 THIS VIDEO IS 16 SECONDS OF COLLAPSE AND DOESNT HAVE THE FIRST 1-2 SECONDS. SHOW ME WHERE ITS DOWN IN 9 secs? Anyone watching this vid just press stop at 10 seconds. its about as tall as surrounding 50 story buildings, but theres still 6 more seconds left AND WE NEVER SEE THE FINAL END BECAUSE THE BUILDINGS IN THE WAY, so theres even more collapse occuring after this clip stops at 16 secs. I swear, u put the FACTS in front of the TWOOFERS and they still dont get it

[ruzziduzzi]

@SuperZero67341 i just watched a CNN clip of the north tower collapse EASILY 20 SECONDS. You are not even close. i can see if it was between 11-9 seconds but its 20 seconds+. @ALLREADERS, if u wonder how stupid these TIN FOIL HAT 9-11 TWOOFERS ARE, just read below after pointing out for 2 days the above video is 16 seconds of collapse, he STILL INSISTS we are wrong, its 9.2 cuz he says so. WTF?!?!?! Just look up any vid here of the collapses, i found the CNN live view of the N. tower. 20 secs+

[ruzziduzzi]

@SuperZero Look u can YELL 9.2 seconds all u want, BUT I PRESS STOP ON THIS VIDEO AT 10 SECONDS, ITS STILL SOME 40-50 stories high. Watch any batch of collapse footage, they all show large portions falling outward, and i agree those fall at free fall speed as they hit ground before the building core does. You are just blind as a bat, and BEEN SNOWJOBBED by lying twoofers from 6 years ago. If u want credibility EXPLAIN THE 16 SEC COLLAPSE VIDEO ABOVE, explain how its NOT 16 seconds of collapse.

[Justin9Noble]

THE UPLOADERS  comments in the video description provide clarification

[ruzziduzzi]

@SuperZero Look you brain dead TWOOFER, were not addressing any other LIES FROM YOU EXCEPT UR CLAIM OF 9 seconds for the towers to fall. Now the vid above shows 16 SECONDS OF COLLAPSE. And with the beginning and ending chopped off, SO HOW DO U EXPLAIN THAT? Until u own up TO THAT AND ADMIT UR WRONG, everyone can keep looking at the vid above and say, WOW, THAT TWOOFER IS BLIND, HOW DOES HE THINK 16 seconds of collapse IS ACTUALLY 9 seconds. Whoever told u the 9 sec LIE is not to be trusted

[Oz1976]

@Superhero67341 No they did not dipshit. Get it through your thick fucking skull. None of the 3 buildings gell at freefall speed. You're regurgitating shit from 8 years ago that the majority of the "Truther" leaders even don't recognize anymore. Not to mention, I'll say it again, FREEFALL SPEED is NOT a CHARACTERISTIC of Controlled Demolition. Get it. You don't know how CD works. You can't fucking count or even clearly observe what's in your face. 13 seconds into WTC1 and 60 stories of core up

[ruzziduzzi]

@Superhero67341 Better yet, do this u TWOOFTARDIAN WARRIOR PRINCESS. The video begins 1-2 seconds into the collapse, but nevermind that, JUST PRESS PAUSE somewhere between 9-10 seconds on this video, THAT MY LOSER TWOOFER ADVERSARY, SHOWS HOW WRONG U ARE. im paused here right now at 10 seconds in, and the tower is still as tall or taller than the surrounding buildings. Oooooops for you! Test it ur self, u shld be ashamed for PARROTING THINGS PPL CAN PROVE ARE LIES WITH THE PUSH OF A BUTTON.

[ruzziduzzi]

@Superhero67341 If this was a 9 second video, well then u wld be right, and i wld be wrong, but somehow u ingore the 7 ADDITIONAL SECONDS! You are one of the DUMBEST TWOOFERS EVER. Look its a 16 second video clip here. With the start/end clipped off, ITS STILL 16 SECONDS OF TOTAL COLLAPSE, and even with it right in front of u, ur gonna deny THE FACTS? Please protest 10 more times SO PPL CAN SEE HOW BRAIN DEAD TWOOFERS ARE. Then explain TWOOFER MATH AND PHYSICS and how u make 16 secs = 9 secs.

[Oz1976]

@Superhero67341 No they didn't. No matter how many times you call me dumb, it's clear you're the one that's mentally difficient. You did not watch the videos I posted. You did not read the SCIENTIFIC PAPERS I've posted. (probably because you can't comprehend them in the slightest). Superhero? More like village idiot.

youtube.com/watch?v=nIZp6aOibi­M <==North Tower collapse. The collapse has long since started when this video begins. At :13 seconds, what's that? THE CORE STILL STANDING ABOVE 7!!

[ruzziduzzi]

@SuperZero67341 EVERYONE TAKE NOTE TO HOW FUCKING STUPID A TWOOFER IS: we are on a video page comment board, and the above video starts perhaps 1-2 seconds INTO THE COLLAPSE, AND THE VIDEO ENDS IN 16 SECONDS AND ITS STILL NOT FINISHED. SO WHERE THE FUCK DOES THIS TWOOFER GET 9.2 SECONDS FROM? EVEN IN THIS VIDEO MISSING THE FIRST 1-2 SECONDS, AT 9 SECONDS THERES SOME 40-50 STORIES STILL STANDING. EXPLAIN THAT!!!!!!!!!! Just watch this 16 sec vid again, PROVES UR WRONG!!!!!!!

[ruzziduzzi]

@Superhero67341 more TWOOFER psychobabble. both oz and i cited credible collapse times NO WHERE NEAR THE 9 secs and 5 secs respectively for it to have been free fall. And u dont even concede that FACT. WATCH AGAIN THE VIDS I LINKED TO OR HERE ABOVE, the debris falling outwards (SOME THAT EVEN HITS WTC 7 BTW!) falls at freefall speed as theres no building to support it, and falls WAY faster and hits the ground before the center portions of the towers did, just look. u been hoodwinked by TWOOFERS!

[ruzziduzzi]

@Superhero67341 Gosh i just watched : ( World Trade Center - No Free-Fall Speed ). Shows with fairly good accuracy fall times of 14.75 seconds and 15.28 (two recordings) for the south tower, and 22.02 secs for the north tower, either one cld be off 1-2 seconds, but still nowhere near the 9 seconds you claim. And if u watch ( Towers did NOT fall at free fall speed! ) u see how the debris that falls outward in the collapse FALLS MUCH FASTER THAN THE COLLAPSING BUILDING, watch for urself! Cheers

[Oz1976]

@Superhero67341 Seriously are you fucking retarded? No they didn't. You are 7 years behind the times my friend. Even Dylan Avery, Steven Jones and Richard Gage have given up on the FREE FALL FALLACY.

heiwaco.tripod . com/blgb.pdf <-- you did NOT read this, GO READ IT MORON..EDUCATE YOURSELF.

/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk <---wtc 7 complete collapse video

/watch?v=Hy0hm4FhB3g <---- another wtc 7 complete collapse video

debunking911 . com/freefall.htm <---go read why FREEFALL is a FALLACY

[ruzziduzzi]

And @superhero, ur more like SUPERBOOB. U are excusing MASS MURDERING ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRRORISTS. Now just think about that for a second or two. U are apologizing for them and giving them support IN A TIME OF WAR, AND BASED ON NO FACTS OR PROOF. Thats the part that makes it most disgusting. If TWOOFERS has some facts or a compelling case after 10 years, i cld understand and if it were fact based, i prolly wld join ur JOKE CAUSE, but the FACTS ARE CLEAR ON 911, TWOOFERS DONT HAVE ANY

[Oz1976]

@Superhero67341 No, it's quite obvious it's YOU who will not learn and YOU who is ignorant. WTC7 DID NOT fall at freefall speed, NOR does "free fall speed" mean CONTROLLED DEMOLITION dumbass. Freefall speed IS NOT a characteristic of CD, that is what's known as a "logical FALLACY". None of those buildings came down at freefall speed. WTC 7 came down in 14-18 seconds total collapse, freefall for a 47 story building is @ 5sec. WTC 1 and 2, came down in 12 and 14 seconds, freefall for them? 9.2sec

[ruzziduzzi]

@Oz1976 Hey oz keep up the good work, fighting ignorance isnt glamorous, the TWOOFERS are utter (udder) boobs arent they. 10 years and they still got NOTHING TO SUPPORT THEIR CASE. Not one person from the infamous "INSIDE JOB" has come forward. U wld think just ONE of the many thousands it wld have required to cover up 9-11 wld have felt slightly guilty for being the accomplice to the murders of nearly 3000. Facts are WTC 7 was expected to collapse, which is why the pulled the firefighters.

[Oz1976]

@ruzziduzzi Indeed. The sad thing is some of these twoofers mean well but they're terribly misinformed and seduced by the likes of Richard Gage (makes $75,000 a year from ae911truth), Steven Jones ($150 bucks a ticket to his symposiums, $25 for his DVD packages, $200 to see him at "CONSPIRACY CON"), Luke Rudkowski (embezzeled over 20 grand from WeAreChange), Dylan Avery (started Loose Change as a work of fiction, his own words, after being denied entry to Purchase Film School). etc etc etc

[Oz1976]

@Superhero67341 ROFL. You TWOOFERS are so duped by the TWOOF PROFITEER SCAM. Don't believe I've said I believed the "big bad gubment"...I do believe in EVIDENCE and SCIENCE. WTC 7 did not fall at "free fall speed". 1) free fall being a characteristic of controlled demolition is a fallacy. 2) WTC 7's total collapse from initiation took 16+ seconds. It was a progressive collapse. When will YOU learn, do something, read.

(heiwaco.tripod . com/blgb.pdf) Journal of Engineering Mech ASCE Vol 134 2008

[Oz1976]

I love these controlled demolition nuts...every single demolitions expert has come out against a controlled demolition theory. They have shot back at these "truthers" who have continuously used clips out of context to "back" these conspiracies.

Fact: Tallest building EVER imploded by controlled demolition - JL Hudson building, 25 stories

WTC 7 - 47 stories

WTC 1 and 2 - 110 stories.

debunked911 . com

get over this bullshit and get to the real truth

[H0MERSlMPS0N]

@Oz1976 "every single demolitions expert has come out against a controlled demolition theory." You're wrong. Danny Joenko (Dutch Controlled Demolition Company) Tom Sullivan (CDI) "Fact: Tallest building EVER imploded by controlled demolition - JL Hudson building, 25 stories" Wrong again. watch?v=nJ6_WBwgNuM&feature=fv­st watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY Your entire comment is wrong. You fail.

[Oz1976]

@H0MERSlMPS0N At the time of the WTC collapses, it was the JL Hudson building...the others happened since. And none as tall as WTC 7 much less 1 and 2....

Tom Sullivan has not now, nor ever, provided a shred of evidence to support his claims only that "it looked" like a controlled demolition (from the north side view video). And I wonder why he no longer works for CDI?

Joenko also said that WTC 1 and 2 COULD NOT have been demo'd...but you forget that part eh? Yeah he recanted bud.

[H0MERSlMPS0N]

@Oz1976

lol You said "Fact: Tallest building EVER imploded by controlled demolition - JL Hudson building, 25 stories". You never said "at the time". Back peddle much??

Also, SHOW us Joenko's recant. I'd like to see this.

[Oz1976]

@H0MERSlMPS0N He recanted that WTC 1 and 2 could not have been demo'd. He said that WTC 7 could not have come down from fire alone. I guess you truthers, and especially the ones that don't show the south side video's of the building (ya know the 20 story hole in it) keep pushing this "fire it couldn't have just been fire"...no shit, structural integrity was already diminished from the collapse of the Towers and debris smashing into WTC 7. It's been 10 years, not one shred of proof to your theory

[Oz1976]

@H0MERSlMPS0N not to mention Danny Jowenko was shown the hazy video of the north side collapse which did not have a clear view of the penthouse collapsing first. Was given leading questions by the initial interviewer ( a truther ), and even said it would require many many hours of painstaking work by more than 30 men to quickly demo WTC7. So unless the "chrarges" were pre-planted (no evidence of) then it couldn't have happened that way. Wonder why he hasn't said anything in 4+ years....

[Oz1976]

@H0MERSlMPS0N go here...and read..

ae911truth . info/wordpress/ae911truths-cas­e/other-issues/danny-jowenko/

[H0MERSlMPS0N]

@Oz1976

"Jowenko Says “I Don’t Know, It’s Guessing For Me”"

That's NOT a recant, as you said. No no.. I want to see a video of him truely recanting his story.

[anewlow23]

@Oz1976 If there is no evidence of controlled demolition how do you explain four floors of wtc 1 steel and concrete fused together from temperatures as hot as the inner earth one of the wtc museums in NYC? or the molten guns found at wtc 6 that weren't even part of the debris pile? Jet fuel cannot melt steel.

[Oz1976]

@anewlow23 It's called compression my friend. Do you not understand how the WTC was built and how it collapsed 10 years later? Controlled demolition wouldn't fuse the floors together it would obliterate them. As hot as the inner earth? No my friend, your hyperbole is ridiculous. The max temperatures seen were around 1000 to 1100 degrees Celsius. Jet fuel didn't melt steel, nice strawman, jet fuel was simply the fire initiator...there were tons of flammables in those towers that fueled the fires

[usarmy68j]

@Oz1976 So how could office fire have melted steel and concrete? In an MSNBC Brian Williams piece called "Remains of the day" Brian visits hangar 17 where they showed him four floors of the WTC that were fused together, that is melted, together and I quote "exposed to temperatures as hot as the inner earth" so I am just going by what the people at hangar 17 said. It seems like I have had this conversation about molten steel b4. Why don't you explain to me how the wtc collapsed in your own words?

[Oz1976]

@usarmy68j the "exposed to temperatures as hot as the inner earth" is hyprbole / sensationalism to make the report more dramatic. The fact is we have NASA thermographic data as well as tests done on the steel and other debris that prove the temperatures were never more than 1100 degrees celsius. You really want to be using shock value reporting a week or so after the event as evidence? There was no molten steel, there was molten METAL. Big difference. (continued)

[Oz1976]

@usarmy68j

(continue)

I already replied how the four floors were fused. Compression from the gravity collapse. Read:

(cee.northwestern .edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers­/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20Wha­t%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20)

WTC 1 and 2 fell victim to a gravity collapse after being severely damaged from the plane impacts, having their fireproofing sheered, and their fire retardant systems failing. WTC 7 fell victim to a progressive collapse started by WTC 1's debris impacting the south face

[Oz1976]

@usarmy68j continued...

and starting fires on several floors that went un fought for over 6 hours.

There was no CD. There was no inside job.

[robbytjuuh]

I don't know the truth but maybe the antenna was bombed too?

[MoltoEpicness]

Get out of your mom's basement conspiracy theorists.

[kevfal]

@MoltoEpicness It's a Conspiracy and not a theory!

[MoltoEpicness]

@kevfal no, just no

[00Eregos00]

so why DID barack obama decide to do 9/11 anyways?

[adrewk]

no way in hell did that antenna reach all the way over to building 7, and rip through it like larry claimed.

now they want us to believe a 47 story building was taking down by an antenna?

you know what time is it? revolution time! lets round them up! whos with me?

[fjh1616]

@adrewk no one said that's what brought it down He said it hit the building. They were expecting wtc7 to collapse 2 ours earlier than it did because of the fires. Fires that brought structural failure to the main truss system. And how do you think it reached? IT WAS 109M long, dammit!

[adrewk]

@fjh1616 ive seen video where it looks like the antenna grazed b7, but if you believe that it started a fire strong enough to bring down a STEEL build of that size, youre one gullible sheep. remember, jet fuel was what supposedly weakened the structure of the towers. so you think the antenna had the same effect?

i bet you also believe the bin laden/sea story too?

people like you make me sick....and theirs just way to many of you.

[fjh1616]

@adrewk Yeah dude, steel buildings often do fall. It's not as strong as everyone makes it out to be, It was not just the antenna, it was a hell of alot more.

And the bin laden sea story? As in the standard muslim tradition story? Lol.

It's you peeps that make me sick. YOu need to get out abit, play with physics. Not everyone's out to get you man. There are too many of you wacko conspiracists out there it's just as unbelievable as the insane theories presented by these conspiracists!

[adrewk]

@fjh1616 if you were given the choice to receive 1million $, but in exchange, 1 million strangers from all around the world would drop dead the second you took the money. would you take it?

now ask yourself, on average, who and how many would say yes to that question.

its a dog eat dog world, people do not care about one another like you may believe/hope. and these same scum bags that are involved in all the "made up conspiracies" would answer yes to that question in a heart beat.

OPEN YO EYES

[fjh1616]

@adrewk And what relevance is that to this?

[adrewk]

@fjh1616 of course you dont see or understand the relevance....youre a fucking idiot.

the relevance is....most people ARE out to get you, and its not a conspiracy. money is what matters.

and sense i dont plan on answering any more of your comments, i want you to know that i hope you are one of the next victims of the american govn / world elite. whether it be contracting aids, or losing a few limbs in another fake terrorist attack. what ever....you deserve it for being a dumb ass lemming

[fjh1616]

@adrewk So let me get this straight: You can't create an argument without slagging people off, and you think this is a fake terrorist attack? Any deliberate attack on groups of people is terrorism. And this quite obviously happens, and killed a lot of people. What matters to the terrorists in the official story isn't hard to comprehend. These are Islamic extremists who have a vendetta against the west, and the US. They had even declared open war on America. Is it so hard to link the two?

[fjh1616]

@adrewk And were the 7/7 London bombings a government coverup too? Dude, the US government may be a bunch of plonkers, but this is taking it to the extreme. Why would they put their own country into financial hardship? Why ruin the economy of one of their biggest cities and kill their own citizens in the process? The logic in that does not work.

[thebluetarp]

@fjh1616 dont be a fool dude! do some research about the london bombings. they were a TOTAL government set up. the facts DO NOT ADD UP AT ALL! way more obvious than 9/11. and might i suggest doing research not on fox news or any of the mainstream media outlets.

[jdburtonsnowboarder]

@fjh1616 plausible it is; Reason is, to control Afghanistan (oil and heroin) If you look at the chart of poppy seed production (for heroin) in 2001 it was almost zero, b/c Al-Qaeda was killing the crops, so we invaded in October, planting of poppy starts in November... the next year poppy production was up 1000%, and 2006 something like 3000%, CIA is well known for smuggling drugs into the U.S (Wiki: CIA drug trafficking) the oil / natural gas is another story...(wiki: Afghanistan pipeline)

[endimion17]

@adrewk Nobody ever blamed the antenna. It were the north wall sections that gouged it.

Funny, you take a lie/myth, attack it, and use the obvious conslusion to back up your fantasies. That's called a strawman, and the only reason your comment has so many thumbs up is because this video is visited by weird people like you.

I'll never understand why do you people have an urge to use pseudoscience to back you up when criticizing your obviously corrupt government. You're just loosing your creds.

[adrewk]

@endimion17 nobody ever blamed the antenna/fire? try again dip shit.

yes, i guess you are right...it is a bit weird for people to care these days.

we should just believe all the lies and myths, and go about our day like you?

pseudoscience? its more like common sense we are using to back up our suspicions.

i will go ahead and give your comment a thumbs up, since nobody else will.

you really should visit my channel, watch all my favs...try to SEE the big picture. its not just about 9/11

[endimion17]

@adrewk No, nobody ever blamed the antenna. Assholes made it up.

Yes, it's pseudoscience. You use pseudoscience and you think it's common sense because you have no idea what you're talking about.

I'll never be able to understand why do you people think that this bullshit helps you. Cause it doesn't. It melts your credit away like wax.

I'm well aware that US government is a bunch of criminals, but there's no need to lie about the physics of 9/11. It's irrelevant and unconnected to the politics.

[adrewk]

@endimion17 "'ll never be able to understand" thats because you live in croatia, you people are not really involved with the rest of the world. you sit on the sidelines ignoring.

you may be aware of the u.s. governments dirty deeds, but what will you or your country do about it? nothing, because your a bunch of pussies like most other countries in the world. what would you do if america decided to invade croatia next, besides die from lies?

lucky for you, your country has no valuable resources

[endimion17]

@adrewk So let me get this straight. I'll never understand why do American assholes use pseudoscience to account for their government's criminal deeds?

Dumbass, do you have any idea what are you talking about? You're exactly showing to me what is wrong with you people. It's not about the physics which you lack understanding of, but it's about your EGO.

Bunch of hippie morons.No wonder your country is sinking. Instead of doing something about it, you're ranting about crackpot ideas.Case closed.

[adrewk]

@endimion17 youll never understand in general. using the word pseudoscience to describe truthers reasoning does not make you sound intelligent, so stop repeating that word over and over.

i have a pretty good idea, and i dont think its got shit to do with ego or lack of understanding of physics, etc.

hippy morons? lol no wonder my country is sinking instead of doing something about it. btw, whats "it"

croatia was invaded? or just trampled through as if it was a bridge?

cased closed...now stfu

[endimion17]

@adrewk Magical thermite, nuclear bombs, death rays, lasers, holographic planes, towers stuffed with explosives on every of the 110 floors, that's pseudoscience.

BTW, yes, invaded and trampled over. FYI, Adriatic sea penetrates the continent the most and offers a path for marine traffic. I don't expect that a typical American would know much about the world history. Your culture is younger than the Vienna's sewer system, as Europeans like to point out.

[adrewk]

@endimion17 had to say it again huh? you mean the magical thermite that was sent to china? and stuffing the towers full of explosives does sound a bit impossible. that other stuff is used by shills to discredit the intelligent compassionate truth seeker.

europeans are still shitting on a shelf, wtf do they know about evolving cultures.

your shit country is much like the french city of carcassonne...its just a gateway. i bet your streets are rich with whores, possibly your mother and sisters.

[endimion17]

@adrewk What you desperately fail to understand is that in order for the notion of your government as bunch of criminals, all these conspiracy ideas about the towers and the physics of 9/11 don't have to be true. They're unrelated and exist only because general American public is too stupid and uneducated in science.

This shit is stripping away your credit. You guys are ridiculed and because of you, ANYONE going against the politics is deemed a crackpot. YOU will eventually destroy yourself.

[endimion17]

@adrewk BTW your remark about European culture just shows how ignorant you are. It's no wonder, with American education system... You guys are doomed. Real life "Idiocracy".

[adrewk]

@endimion17 ive been to europe recently, every toilet i used had a shelf (a very nasty system). you people refuse to evolve like the west. another example, some your doors still use skeleton keys. if you cant beat them, ignore them. is that the european motto going around?

[adrewk]

@endimion17 so, what would you do if you wernt a big puss? what act or notion would suffice the situation? how does one bring down a dirty government?

i would say showing its true colors would be a hell of a start. and hey, wtf do you think all us "conspiracy theorists" have been doing over the years? and guess what, many good people are listening and realizing the truth now, thanks to us.

assholes like you just give us titles like "twoofers" making us appear to be "weird"

who's side r u on?

[endimion17]

@adrewk I don't have to do anything,it's not my country.I see no American civilians helping my country in the same manner.

If I was a citizen of USA, I'd be active just as I'm active in my country, but I wouldn't be near crackpots as it would destroy my credibility. Plus I despise pseudoscience.

No, you people do not "appear" weird, and certainly not cause of us. You ARE weird because you're a bunch of crackpots. Well-minded,but decreasing group of crackpots delusional about their significance.

[adrewk]

@endimion17 most americans never heard of croatia, your country isnt involved like it should be. ive never seen a product made in croatia. you people are on the sidelines, ignoring the game.

weird=the minority, so yes i guess we are weird. most people in my country/world, only care about them selves/friends or family. nothing else matters. and thats the problem with the world today. not enough "weird" people.

im done talking to you, fuck off and have a fucked up day/life

ps YOU LOST THE DEBATE

[endimion17]

@adrewk The most important thing is that you established your domination over the fact that you're an American. That's rrrreeeeealy important. You don't get it, do you? Hah, I don't think you can.

We weren't debating. I was stating some facts and you showed your ignorance. Toodle doo!

[endimion17]

@adrewk Oh yeah, the fact that most of your fellow citizens never heard of Croatia is not something to be bragging about. But as I've said, your education system is a complete failure, producing ignorants. That's also a well known fact, commonly used to mock Americans throughout the world, which is sad.

One day when you pull your head from your asshole, you'll see that USA is not the most important place on the planet. In fact, it's becoming more and more marginalized in some aspects.

[adrewk]

@endimion17 youll never understand in general. using the word pseudoscience to describe truthers reasoning does not make you sound intelligent, so stop repeating that word over and over.

i have a pretty good idea, and i dont think its got shit to do with ego or lack of understanding of physics, etc.

hippy morons? lol no wonder my country is sinking instead of doing something about it. btw, whats "it"

croatia was invaded? or just trampled through as if it was a bridge?

cased closed, now stfu

[endimion17]

@adrewk Regarding my country, I guess it was one of the most invaded places on the planet because it has nothing to offer. Dumbass ignorant.

[whtzfab]

That is NOT the antenna .... it's a section of WTC 1 perimeter wall.

[VannakaZeke]

Larry Silverstein's gains after 9/11 ?

roughly around 400 million $. He also filed a suit or something like that and lost the affair. Yet he won another 3.5 Billion $. Funny, how he and his family weren't there during the attacks and how he has won such a high sum of money ...

[flatsofficial]

it amazes me that our government was able to sucker us into another war, didn't we learn anything from pearl harbor.

[jomariofan]

pause at 0:03 any one see a dragon face in the collapse and a hamster like face in the floating smoke

[DanielCampbell4]

@jomariofan Cut out the weed man :)

[kingofiron257]

wheres the antenna?

[fakeham]

You can only see it for about 2 seconds at the beginning, it pokes through the top of the smoke just barely.

[thenormog]

''thegrady24'' this from the man who cusses? Wow way to stand up for what ya believe in. Instead of agreeing or not ya just had to insult. Sure my grammar might not be the best but never said I was and english major did I ? So sftu ya close minded retarded window licker.

[thenormog]

but its simple. We as americans stick our nose in other peoples buss. When it don't belong.then we act supprised when we get attacked. You know if this was still during WWII these people would say that the government caused pearl harbor or some bs. We got attacked get over it. No conspiracy to it.

[TheGrady24]

Nice grammar, dumbass.

[thenormog]

like most major cities and believe in ny major building are linked underground. So when the wtcs fell the took out underground support for building 7.its lucky any other building connected to them didn't give away too.

[Skeptic121]

@thenormog So why didn't WTC6 collapse?

It was much closer to the towers. Why not the Verizon Building or the Post Office, both of which were right next to WTC7?

[intheknow7]

For those unaware WTC7 was Hq for CIA-FBI-Secret Service on 9/11. This is the heart of the intelligence community in NYC-they had total vision of Operational Theatre. This US Army Vet wants to believe the official version of events, however knowledge, scientific fact, eyewitness testimony and common sense prevail-We were lied to yet again. The Op was staged in their front yard w/media as ring announcers.

[intheknow7]

For the younger generation: Truth is such a rare quality that it is NEVER freely received, but must fight its way into the world. Your generation has AWESOME TOOLS for exposing these megalomaniacs w/psychopathic personalities funded by Rothschilds/Rockefellers and their ilk. DO NOT ALLOW THEM DECEIVE YOU as they have my generation which should be ashamed of our cowardice.

[intheknow7]

This US Army Veteran, who lost friends in those steel death towers, knows Covert Ops when he sees them-Rules of Covert Warfare being applied to civilian population-in this case the American public (sheeple, useless eaters) The notion there were gaping holes in U.S. Air Defense System allowing an asymmetrical attack of this nature is preposterous. What the hell is NORAD for? Mr. VP Cheney where were U on 9-11 BEFORE the impacts?

[kevfal]

@intheknow7 Cheney head was up his ass heading to the bunker!

[ifudontlikemefuckoff]

god is dead.

[DrakrSlyr]

did the antenae survive, cause if it did they could use the antenae for the memorial.

[Skeptic121]

Roll the video to about 0:1

Watch the antenna tilt behind a smoke cloud.

Pause the video. Look at the picture. The plane impact area has collapsed. The lower, undamaged part of WTC1 is still solid; nothing really wrong with it. Debris sitting on top, but nothing the building wasn't already supporting. Note the dust cloud. Now roll the video to 0:03

Now we see a huge and rapidly expanding dust cloud with debris flying upward and outward. Not a collapse; an explosion.

[bajesus666]

the top part lost support, at the impact zone. The top fell downwards causing great stress on the otehr floors. The stress built up released rapidly, making it look like an explosion. And if it was a bomb, you would have heard it in the videos from the ground, watch a few...your hear anything?!?!?!!! its people like you who destroy this country, how dare anyone blame their homeland for mass murder....go die

[Skeptic121]

bajesus: Did you watch the video and pause it at one second? Good! Now look at the falling dust and debris that used to be the upper floors. That debris (that used to be the upper floors) HAS ALREADY HIT the remainder of the tower, and the bottom part of the tower is FINE. It has survived the impact of the upper floors! Now roll the video...see how the lower part just blows up?  It blows up just a second or so TOO LATE to be the result of falling debris.

[Skeptic121]

@bajesus666

Not to nit-pick, but most of us have never used the word "homeland" before 9/11 for a very good reason. Our ancestors came here from other countries. THOSE countries are our ancestral "homelands" that our ancestors voluntarily abandoned so that they, and we, might be Americans. In my own case, I no longer feel the slightest loyalty to England or Germany.

[DarkwingScooter]

@Skeptic121 I believe the word he was looking for was "Fatherland".

The word homeland didn't have such crass nationalist connotations before, but it has come to take that meaning because of people like him.

[cojoilustrado]

Guys, I was there, three blocks away from ground zero when the towers fell. WTC7, as far as the visible structure was concerned, was intact. From my angle I couldn't see where the antenna fell because of the smoke, but it didn't fall on top of WTC7

[Darkstick27]

You can see a little sliver left of the tower. it looks like a pin in the center at the end of the video

[HardyBoyFan101]

I saw part of the antenna falling.

[VanDerLubbe]

It might be a good idea to click on "About This Video" for an update on my comments:

I've found the location of the two buildings we see in front of the Tower in this video, which also determines the direction of the camera view.

[hgfbob]

Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250 ºC: . Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC

NIST-1-3 p.xli,101,132

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?

If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?

How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?

[hgfbob]

no core column examined showed temp. above 250C NIST 1-3 p.95,101,132

no evidence the type of joining methods, materials, or welding procedures used was improper NIST 1-3 p.99

recovered bolts were stronger than typical. NIST 1-2 p.133

[hgfbob]

"what was this vid supposed to prove, did I miss it"-

it proves that the core was taken out...and it has been proven that it wasn't from impact, heat or fire

[Xenomorph911]

Mr. Larry Silverstein claimed recently the North Tower antenna fell towards and sliced into WTC building 7, yet all the video evidence shows it actually fell entirely the opposite direction. See the info this guy provided above.

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?

If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact?

How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

[Xenomorph911]

Yep you called that one, there's no visual evidence that supports Silverstein's claim. It tips south then vanishes in the dustcloud.