@blueshaddow1996 - 2 years ago you told @freein2339 that "they" would release your name, and you'd give him "an interview for being so persistent" regarding 9/11.
I want to read this interview but can't find it without more information.
What's your name?
Can you post the interview or its transcripts?
You also said we "will just have to wait" for answers until your book comes out.
What's its name and when did it come out?
Waiting with bated breath for your response to my questions.
War Industry, US Govt Drug Industry, To waste money to collapse the dollar, To control oil, to position themselves closer to china and Pakistan and Iran, all for the glory of the new world order. Us sovereignty is gone, the world elites in the banking families
You guys all misinterpreted him. He said he "went down to the scene" (that means he went to the towers). He went there because they were already struck and unstable. It was then that one of the authorities informed him that the building would collapse, then he and everyone else evacuated but it came down before they could, which means he didn't have any more forewarning that anybody else.
The NIST theory or correctly stated "Theories" has been proven by numerous scienctists...Here's one link that explain the falsehood in the bowing theory
..Somehow I cant post a response.!!???..I guess they dont want me to answer that last questions..Well with a dem admin and a conservative admin in Canada....I wonder if once the party loses that the people go to jail??..Nixon did not go to jail...In some countries they hang losing parties..Sore winners I guess..
Do you think the public will get a different view of the "official" version , thereby resulting in someone or someones from the Bush administration going to jail...??
..I think they would accept it..I dont know what to think about the Bush Admin..To some he is crude others they like the John Wayne type.Back after 911 the country neede that type..The public approved of him then..Obama now has alot of repairing to do.Tolerance is what is needed now..As for going to Jail,,anyone can go..everyone is treated equally.
Since the Bush administration has been lying to us about 911 , why would the country "need" him..To spread more lies so we could then go to Iraq...???...Somebody in his administration should be in jail..That includes Bush , Cheney , Rice , Ashcroft or whoever else was involved with the cover up of 911 and the "manufactured" reasons for going to Iraq....
@blueshadow1996 so americans "saw"Bush like a crude John Wayne type? thats interesting
the rest of the west sees him like .. a stupid .silly..non intelligent ..joke kind of person and a hypocrite with no personal value puppet(regardless the fact he is seen as heartless too)/sorry/Very far from the john wayne type
@delagrazia So different from the opinion of the American ppl.Because he was the type of leader needed back then..Now its a new chapter in American history..From slavery to manifest destiny..Democracy is not as clean as ppl think..John Wayne was known for phrases like"The only Indian is a dead Indian"..except Bush was saying the only good terrorist is a dead one..Same tune..
"I said, Chief, they're evacuating the other building; right? He said, No. . . . I said, Why not? They blew up the other one. I thought they blew it up with a bomb. I said, If they blew up the one, you know they're gonna blow up the other one. He said, No, they're not. I said, Well, you gotta tell them to evacuate it, because it's gonna fall down and you gotta get the guys out.
He said, I'm just the Battalion Chief. I can't order that. . . . I said, You got a fucking radio and you got a fucking mouth. Use the fucking things. Empty this fucking building. Again he said, I'm just a Battalion Chief. I can't do that. . . . Eventually this other chief came back and said, They are evacuating this tower. . . . And sometime after that . . . I watched the north tower fall." [William Reynolds - Firefighter]
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but theyre afraid for their jobs to admit it because the higher-ups forbid discussion of this fact. Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Departments Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. There were definitely bombs in those buildings, he told me.
"At that point, a debate began to rage because. . . many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade, and officers were gathering companies together and the officers were debating whether or not to go immediately back in or to see what was going to happen with 1 World Trade at that point. The debate ended pretty quickly because 1 World Trade came down." [Christopher Fenyo - Firefighter]
"I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions." [Craig Carlsen -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.)]
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
Firefighter Schroeder recollects in great detail how he was one of the first firefighters to rush to the complex. We first assembled on West Street, where we saw someone burnt beyond recognition. We were like What is going on here? and then went straight into the Marriot building From there, Firefighter Schroeder made his way to the lobby of the North Tower. It looked like a bomb went off, and we started making our way up the stairs to rescue as many people as we could.
Firefighter Schroeder made it all the way up to the 23rd floor before barely hearing on the failing radios that another plane was coming in. That plane would hit the South Tower though for some reason We were tossed like a rag doll by another explosion in our building. People were making there way down the stairwells burnt like you couldnt believe. We were all shocked because it seemed as if there was fire everywhere, on so many floors. It just didnt make sense.
Lou Cacchioli, Firefighter in WTC 1: At that point, Cacchioli found one of the only functioning elevators, one only going as high as the 24th floor .. "Tommy Hetzel was with me and everybody else also gets out of the elevator when it stops on the 24th floor," said Cacchioli, "There was a huge amount of smoke. Tommy and I had to go back down the elevator for tools and no sooner did the elevators close behind us, we heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb.
It was such a loud noise, it knocked off the lights and stalled the elevator.
"Luckily, we weren't caught between floors and were able to pry open the doors. People were going crazy, yelling and screaming. And all the time, I am crawling low and making my way in the dark with a flashlight to the staircase and thinking Tommy is right behind me. "I somehow got into the stairwell and there were more people there.
When I began to try and direct down, another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later, although it's hard to tell, but I'm thinking, 'Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993!'
those beaam were the ones exposed to flame..You can weaken steel with only firewood...how do you think blacksmiths did their work?..with pressure from a hammer and softend steel..they could punch holes in it,twist it.
Did you know that there were a large number of independent reports (many from firefighters who were familiar with such phenomena) indicating that people heard a collection of explosions, along with flashes, prior to the collapse of the twin towers -- reports which are consistent with what is known as a "demolition ring" -- that is a series of explosions running around a building during a controlled demolition or implosion?
Did you know that for the most part, evidence indicates that the non-metallic portions of the three WTC buildings which collapsed were pulverized into relatively small particles rather than the much larger chunks of concrete one would expect to find if the "official" story concerning the collapsed buildings were true?
Did you know that if the government's "officially-adopted pancake theory" were true, there very likely would have been massive, largely intact, steel columns -- both core and perimeter -- that still would be standing (albeit, possibly, bent and twisted a little) from the 110 storey original structures and that these steel columns would likely extend upward many, many stories into the sky rather than having collapsed into a relatively small, compact, several storey-high heap of wreckage?
and, in addition, there is absolutely zero evidence that any of the core steel columns were subjected to temperatures even as high as 482 degrees of Fahrenheit?
Did you know that there is absolutely no evidence that any of the 47 or 24 massive core columns in the three WTC buildings that collapsed were subjected to the sort of intense heat for extended periods of time which would have been necessary to weaken those columns?
Did you know that of the 16 perimeter beams from the World Trade Center that were examined, only three showed evidence of having been subjected to temperatures higher than 482 degrees Fahrenheit (far below the 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit needed to structurally weaken steel provided that the steel is heated for a a sufficiently long enough period at such an elevated temperature)
Did you know that all three of the World Trade Center buildings which collapsed did so at very close to free-fall rates of speed (i.e., free fall would occur if one were to drop an apple off the top of any of these buildings and there was nothing, but air, resisting the fall of this body)?
Did you know that besides lacking any actual evidence to substantiate the NIST theory for building collapse, the NIST theory cannot explain either the quality of near free-fall speeds of the collapse of the three WTC buildings nor can that theory explain the symmetrical footprint property of all three collapsing WTC buildings --
in fact, the NIST theory would only be consistent with a non-free-fall-like collapse which was very asymmetrical ... neither of which was observed in the collapsing WTC buildings?
Did you know that the "official" pancake theory adopted by the government would not have reduced the concrete portions of the three WTC buildings to powder but, instead, would have yielded much larger chunks of concrete because the energy generated through the force of gravity of uncontrolled collapsing buildings would not have been sufficient to be able to produce pulverized powder particles?
Did you know that the same high explosives which are used to slice up the core and peripheral steel columns of a skyscraper are powerful enough to reduce all non-metallic components of the building (such as poured concrete) into powder?
I am not tlking bout getting it whitehot to melt it,it need only get redhot,which cna be done on a kitchen stove.or a small torch....There were evacuation orders inplace issued by the OEM.
Did you know that although the south tower of the WTC was hit second, suffered less structural damage than the north tower, and exhibited fewer fires than the north tower, nonetheless, the south tower collapsed first, some 56 minutes after being struck by the airplane?
Did you know that tests were carried out in Great Britain during the 1990s in order to investigate the extent of damage which might occur if steel beam structures were enveloped in high-intensity heat (1500 - 1700 degrees Fahrenheit) for many hours (4), and no collapse of the steel beams was observed in any of these experiments?
Did you know that video and photographic evidence indicates that when the south tower started to collapse, the collapse began at a point much lower than the point where the airplane struck the building and much lower than where fires were burning?
Did you know that in order for steel to melt, the steel would have to be exposed to a sustained source of, at least, 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit ... brief or very limited exposure to such high temperatures is not enough?
Did you know that steel starts to melt around 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit, but hydrocarbon fires arising from, say, burning jet fuel would not reach more than 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit ... or 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit less than what would have been necessary to melt any one section of the 47/24 core columns of the three respective buildings,
or the 236/57 perimeter columns of the three buildings, let alone all 47/24 of the core columns or all 236/57 of the perimeter columns of the three World Trade Center buildings?
Did you know that some experts who support the government's "official story" concerning the events of 9/11 say that if steel is heated to a temperature of 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit, the steel will lose 80 percent of its strength?
But, did you know that these same experts tend to leave out the fact that one would have to subject such steel to a very, very high source of heat for a considerable period of time in order to heat even one portion of a massive column of steel to 1300 degrees Fahrenheit?
Did you know if one were to heat one section of a steel column that heat transfer would tend to radiate away some of the heat from the section being heated, thereby, making it harder to attain and sustain 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit at any given point?
Did you know that in 2004 a fire raged for 17 hours in a 54-story steel-frame building in Caracas, Venezuela and that the intensity of the fire was such that it completely gutted the top 23 stories of the building, and, yet, the building did not collapse?
Did you know that in 1991 a fire burned in a steel-structure building (One Meridian Plaza) in Philadelphia for 18 hours with such intensity that 8 out of 38 stories were gutted and even though many of the building's beams and girders sagged and twisted due to being exposed to the intense heat for such a long period of time, yet, the building did not collapse?
Did you know that less than 15 minutes after the second of the twin towers was hit, photographs of the towers, as well as the testimony of both firefighters and people temporarily trapped in those buildings, indicate that the fires in the buildings were only scattered and slight, as well as not being even sufficiently hot, in most places, to either melt or break the exterior glass of the buildings?
Did you know that although the south tower of the WTC was hit second, suffered less structural damage than the north tower, and exhibited fewer fires than the north tower, nonetheless, the south tower collapsed first, some 56 minutes after being struck by the airplane?
why is it hard to beleive the fire weakend the steel and it broke underneath the impact zone because the steel had fireproofing knocked off and flame weakned it..Consider a blacksmith only has to get the steel red hot too shape it on the anvil..That was alot of pressure on those beams..
.it never melted,,got red hot and lost its abilty to hold the floors on top,smashing each floor like a shotgun slug blasting its way down always increasing power....
Do you really believe that nonsense or do you WANT to believe it...First of all the steel didn't get 'red hot"..That could only be done in a furnace not in a building with most of the heat going out of the window..The fuel was not hot enough , check it out...
Do I have to beleive it? The steel was red hot and you could see it.Even as it fell you could see the flame..If they did not beleive me than all the press and triage would still have been at the base of the towers..Yes I was the one who called ,but many of you dont know who I was talking with..
The firemen actually reported that they encounter molten steel that can only be produced from Thermite with is used in controlled demolitions...The steel was cut by the explosives that caused the WTC towers to fall..It is not possible for jet fuel to melt steel...Not in this universe...
no one said it melted steel.Ask any blacksmith ,welder or gunsmith how easily steel breaks after it gets red hot and slowly cools..Which firemen actually said they found molten steel..There are reasons for many things and you could tell the attackers wanted the towers to fall on the people creating as much terror as they can..From experience wrking with steel I knew the towers will fall..So I called..notice an evac happening after the second tower was hit?..
The evac happened because the tower was hit not because they thought the towers were going to fall...The fireman actually said that the fire would have under control with no problem...And they heard a series of explosions in the towers right they fell..The reason the buildings fell is because they were imploded just like WTC7 was imploded...Face it man , the "official" version sounds like a fairy tale that keeps changing...Lies have a way of doing that...
there are facts about who called and when the call happened..I have spoken with NIST and the RCMP up here about why I called..I dont have to face anything because I know about the events..the problem is many people have never worked with steel yet they seem to have the same story except their own version..If there was a planned explosion then it would have made me part of it..Instead of being part of the rescue..NYPD,FDNY,CSIS,RCMP and the CIA know who I am..
It's apparent that "they' didn't need you to be part of it..Whoever or whatever you are doesn't matter since you can't explain all the holes in the "official" version...Why not deal with the truth..??? And why do you ignore what happen at WTC7 ..???
And you dont think it was me he was talking about in his interview with Jennings.What about the other buildings that were destroyed because the tower fell on them..WTC7 is where they were going to set up a triage,they had too move it and evryone from the tower.7 came down and the fiefighters were ordered to stay clear as they knew it was collapsing..because of fire..
Bullshit...WTC7 fell because it was imploded not because of a few small fires...You can keep fooling yourself all you like or you can defend the bullshit "official" version of 911 , which keeps changing by the way , all you want..The facts are very easy to see that 911 was an inside job...Anybody with a little common sense can see that...
But you cant see it? You must have some common sense..At least a little..You probably never worked with steel..If I did not go to the Commission hearing,its my choice..I did my part then.I saw your site,no sign of a person who works woth his mind or muscle.Loose change did not want to hear my story,because yhey had already released their film.
You didn't go to "my site" because I don't have one..The NIST never stated how the WTC7 building fell..It was imploded , just like the twin towers were imploded..You can see the demolition explosions as the buildings fell..I know you are trying to protect ther Bush administration but I have a little too much honesty and common sense to fall for your "version"...I have better luck with the truth....
..I should have said channel.I have no need to protect any admin,I would not be surprised if the Obama admin pays me a visit next month. I am privy to some events,I always thought the American ppl knew..They treat me so different since then,police use to always look at me like I must have done something wrong..Since 9/11/01 they wave and even help if I am stuck on the side of the road..Th Xmas cards I got plus the invitation from Condi Rice to meet the pres..
What does that have to do with all the evidence pointing to an inside job of 911...From the WTC towers to the Pentagon , the "official" is full of lies...Don't you "see" that..???
Evrything the NYPD did on that day in NYC shows they followed my instructions.They knew when both towers were going to collapse and ordered everyone out of the building.Somehow the disabled people who were left on the 12th floor were being rescued by the FDNY..No one seems to evr mention that..
Because he's speaking after the fact! Cmon man it doesnt even make sense to say after the fact that the building might come down when we know for a fact that it did.
Even before the building the fell, I THOUGHT it was coming down ALSO. Nobody told me, it was common sense! Since it did happen, my suspicion were reaffirmed, so I would be justified in saying, I knew the building was coming down because it did.
lol Confession? He thought the building might fall down, and somehow thats a confession that he believed the building was rigged by a super secret government organization in order to dupe the United States into going to war to further the Agenda of the New World Order....
Or he speculated like everyone else, that the building was on fire and it might collapse. Guess we are all going to jail for thinking the same thing.
What idiot would admit on national television or radio that he knew the World trade center was rigged to explode. It doesnt even pass the common sense test.
if you doubt the nwo then type this in. a picnic at port arthur: the port arthur massacre. it changed the gun laws of an entire nation in one foul swoop. australia's.
911 was planned so you idiots will support war becouse war is a big buiseness and money goes from your pockets into the government pockets im gonna do you creeps a favor and tell you this once
1. I guess you have no source? Please explain the intercept process of our ADIZ's. How does it work? Who is responsible? You keep avoiding as if your don't really know.
2. Why are you avoiding any attempt to answer my questions? Is it that you don't know or they didn't tell you how to answer? Are you going to avoid them for ever?
Nobody heard "bombs". They heard explosions which could be from a variety of sources. Not a single person heard explosives, just explosions, there is a difference.
Since no similar structure has ever collapsed due to fire damage, how did someone know in advance that this was going to happen, and who was it that informed Giuliani that it was about to happen?
Why is there evidence that appears to show that the Towers were intentionally demolished?
Why were Jews warned to vacate the Towers, but Christians were not?
Perhaps Rudy was saying that after the first tower collapsed, they warned him about it that the other one will probably also collapse. Remember, there was some point that the higher command decided to pull out emergency personnel from the tower that would fall, although the message didn't get through unfortunately.
I agree that he could have been talking about the second Tower after the first one collapsed. Try to use more credible evidence for the 9/11 truth movement - this kind of stuff just takes away from the real evidence. Stick to the facts, not conjecture.
To the previous fool, G-d has nothing to do with "nostradamus" some false prophet of the new age cults. Half of that stuff is doctored and fake, the rest didn't come true. Real prophecy found in the bible has come true and will come true.
It obviously was not the FDNY.. ironicaly the people who were in the building and most capable of deciding whether the tower was at risk of collapse.. after all they are trained to make those decisions anyway...I would have informed the firefighters to get out first. :) Who was this informer???
Are Hilary or Obama going to make this a presidential election issue? I would like to see the winning democratic candidate promise an independent investigation if elected.
Impossible? I guess you got your degree from a CT website? Oh wait, you became an expert by reading the internet. This is how 99% of CT experts get their info.
Remember, it must be true, it was found on the internet/youtube.
In other words, you too are a CONSPIRACY THEORIST, you ignorant sheep. It's just a matter of which conspiracy theory is easier to swallow. And in this case, it's the government's version.
I'm up for the US government challenging the American thinkers who KNOW that the American government killed its own people. But I doubt they would...
Semantics MY ASS. It is what it is. And conspiracy theorists has been given a new definition in an attempt to marginalize, and ultimately silence thinkers who refuse to accept lies from our evil government.
And there is plenty of evidence to counter the highly false 'official' story of what really happened. Too bad you're too much of a pussy to accept it for what it is. Slave.
Other than resorting to childish name-calling and equally juvenile semantics games, do you happen to have any this so-called "evidence" that would pass the Rules of Evidence in ANY court in this country?
Keep in mind, canned talking points are not considered evidence.
ALSO - how do you expect criminals to investigate themselves? The fact it, the government has yet to confront us skeptics, therefore why would you expect anything, other than the lie, in court? Wake the fck up and stop being a slave.
I can understand you're afraid to even consider the possibility of your government being evil, but it's either now or never. WAKE UP, SHEEP!
Also, when I referred to "journalistic", I was referring to professional journals, not newspapers. I should have assumed you wouldn't have known at your age.
So, why are you so offended by being called a CTist? Does it infer that you believe anything spoon fed to you by a person from the internet that wishes to make money from you?
2. I believed 9/11 was an inside job from the day it happened.
3. I'm not offended by you calling me a CT, because - like you, that is what I am. 9/11 skeptics have our own theories since we don't believe the bullshit government theory. I'm just offended by the fact that you're so clueless to believe conspiracy theorists are bad. In fact, that makes you sound very unintelligent.
1. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Fire Engineering, Civil Engineering ASCE, Journal of Acoustical Society of America, & Journal of Engineering Mechanics.
2. Typical lie from most CTists. I have heard this from so many people I laugh every time.
3. Then why bring up a childish semantics argument? Tinfoil types like yourself are what gives humor to the rest of the scientific and military world. Based on your lack of education, I find it VERY funny to hear of your opinions on intelligence.
1. Many of these journals have already been exposed for lying AND/OR withholding information to further their cause.
2. I don't expect you to cry. I mean, you have not yet come to the realization that you're a slave. And your laughing is simply a defense mechanism, which I don't fully blame you for. In order to feel protected, you must block all truth from entering your head.
3. If speaking the truth about what a ct is is childish, then what does that make you?
The fact is, PNAC predicted a catastropic event years before 9/11/2001. It was to happen in order to increase US military presense in the Middle East and secure vast resources.
Also, since 9/11:
1. They have yet to capture Osama.
2. They have yet to find the so-called wmd's in Iraq.
3. They are building a huge embassy in Iraq, with a pool and everything, as if that is what they told us they were going in there for. And the occupation of Iraq could not be done without 9/11.
And experts are saying just that: 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. It was nothing our trillion dollar defense system couldn't handle.
Have you listened to both sides of the story, or did you quickly dismiss one conspiracy theory, while accepting the other? If so, then you're a dishonest slave who obviously will believe whatever your government tells you.
Afterall, we would not be occupying Iraq right now, and building a huge embassy IF 9/11 didn't happen. Wake up!
Our "trillion dollar defense system" was not designed for domestic attacks. I'm sure since your military experience is based on XBox, you wouldn't have known that.
I have read almost every point the CTists have made about 9-11 and laugh at their ignorance.
Imagine a professor that hasn't left the classroom in 20 years telling me about incendiary devices that have NEVER been used in demolition.
Or a Professor of Folklore telling me about explosive demolition.
1. You have a source for your basis of this comment? By the case you put it in, you are guessing, it seems. Please, tell me what you know about our defense system and your sources of this claim.
2. ANY claim that the 9-11 was done by anything other than 19 hijackers. ANY claim that there were explosives in any building at GZ. ANY claim to the US being a part of the attack. Any claim that the CIA was a part of the attack. ANY claim that you give without bona fide evidence.
1. What source, 'tard? You wasn't aware of many defense entities, such as NORAD, that exist to protect our skies?
2. That about says it all. You have been programmed to reject ANY claim regarding 9/11, so long as it's not about those box cutters.
And I bet the witnesses who heard bombs in the building were all delusional? Even the ones who ran down the steps to find the lobby totally blown away? Get a grip on reality, man/woman!
Typical canned response when you have ZERO facts and ZERO brains to debate as a grown up.
What makes me think you are a paid sheep for those that are making money on the backs of the extremely gullible? Because they don't need to pay anyone. there will always be useful idiots like you to do their work for them as they cash in their ad checks.
Anytime you find some facts to debate, let's see them. Canned talking points are your downfall so far.
Luckily I live in Australia and get to watch all of this from outside your media and hype. This was the greatest tragedy I think I will ever witness in my lifetime and to just put the "blinkers" on as we say, and not question the garbage your fed, is stupidity. The FACTS are there for all to see. You obviously believe what you are told - and yes, there are fairies at the bottom of the garden !
Well, if the "facts" are there to be seen, then show us.
In the US, we have a system of laws that dictate what is real evidence and what is fake. So far, there has been ZERO items entered into ANY court case that pass the rules of evidence.
Why is that? Could it be that CT websites are not considered evidence? What about guesses? Conjecture? Non-exert opinions? Presumptions?
FACT! US citizens do not have any right to sue a sitting President, based on the "Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity" - no matter how much evidence you have !!
There will always be, as you call them "conspiracy theories". All theories must be evaluated by an external independant body. Jesus !, The Official Report on 9/11 is a theory as well remember !!
Strange how they left Building 7 out of the Official Report..Whoooops !
The "official" report did not have the task to cover WTC 7. Whooops!
Maybe you should wonder why the "official report" didn't cover WTC's 4, 5, & 6 either. Since you have ZERO facts to back up your claims, you will always be thought of as a CTists since all CT's are backed up with guesses and no facts.
So, when you gather up all your evidence, let me see your federal filing on 21 Jan 2009. There are about a million of us that need a good laugh.
3 Buildings fell that day..remember!!! Building 7 was admitedly "pulled" and thats why it was left out of the report. At least 50% of americans will agree with me. Just because you dont is your opinion and i'll let you have that, everyone should.
It just seems strange that you question "NOTHING" of the unprecedented events of that day.
"pulled"??? Really? I find it strange that you know nothing about explosive demolition, yet you somehow believe that "pull" is a demo industry term meaning to use explosives to destroy a building. Why? Because someone with just a little experience told you? Is this how conspiracies work? Some makes up a story and then tells other people so they tell the same story even though it is clearly a lie?
Also, who said it was "pulled"? Show me the quote. This will be funny!!
He was referring to pulling the fire fighting effort. This was corroborated by him and the Fire chief he was referring to.
Since you are limited to a few CT websites, for your "research", you wouldn't have known that. It's OK, this is common for those that believe these little tales of conspiracy.
Did you find your source for the "pull it" industry terms? Still waiting. Actually, I know you can't find it because it doesn't exist. I'll let you stew over it, though.
So the fire fighting effort was called "IT". Nice theory! You think he would have said "the smartest thing to do is get our firefighters out of the building".
The FACTS are blatant and if you chose to ignore them, so be it !
Anyone who reads our posts can see your thought process, so i'll leave it up to the readers. Watch the live videos and interviews with ordinary people and firefighters who were there and "make up your own mind !!!". Dont just be told what to think.
That was what he intended. Maybe he didn't feel he had the time to sparse his words correctly. I'm sure you as a Monday morning QB would like to use that as a basis. He didn't.
Your so-called facts are fake and are not "blatant". They are made up and you have proven this time and time again. Especially with your mind reading attempt at what Silverstein said and meant.
Did you find that evidence I asked for or are you going to avoid it as if it never existed?
This is common when CTists can't answer such simple questions. You dodge, avoid, change the subject, and anything you can do to not answer such a simple question.
I figured you couldn't answer. You just proved to me that you are all talking points and no specifics.
Quote: "You dodge, avoid, change the subject, and anything you can do to not answer such a simple question."
Are we talking about your president here.?
The catch phrases "weapons of mass destuction & conspiracy theory" have a lot in common - they were both made up by your goverment!
Enjoy debunking anything you can get your hands on, it seems to be your mission in life. It would be easier to have a discussion with a brick with a pocket full of one sided coins. ....next.
I see you have now changed the subject once again. Are all your posts going to be this childish?
I'm glad you cannot debate as an adult.
We in America laugh at those kind of people. Whenever we hear Elvis sightings, crop circles, chem trails, and 9-11 conspiracies, we all get a good laugh.
Since you are in another country, you won't get to enjoy the irony of you trying to convince me of my govt.
Not only do you have Rudy admitting foreknowledge but you have Larry Sliverstein confessing to having the building PULLED.Couple that with Rudy almost giving the WTC to Larry and the big insurance payoff and -Well - I smell a big fat rat.
Which Presidential Candidates are for One World Government and Open Borders?
Who is a CFR / NAU Member?
Fred Thompson / Rudy Giuliani / Mitt Romney / John McCain / Jim Gilmore / Newt Gingrich / Hilary Clinton / Barack Obama / John Edwards / Joe Biden / Chris Dodd /
Bill Richardson
Go to the CFR website - Check the membership and involvement of candidates. See For Yourself!!
Here you have foreknowledge of the events in his own words. The bunker was abandoned early and the power was shut off (although the backup systems can on). They all knew the building was going to be demolished. In fact Rudi moved in with the FEMA folks who just happened to be doing practice runs the day before. Coincidence?????
Predicted 9/11? Its amazing do you even know what he said? "I predict that the NWO will use CIA Cell operative OBL to conduct some kind of attack against the US." He had already bombed embassies. He bombed a Naval ship. He was on a roll so another attack was sure to happen. Nostradamus anyone?
@blueshaddow1996 - 2 years ago you told @freein2339 that "they" would release your name, and you'd give him "an interview for being so persistent" regarding 9/11.
I want to read this interview but can't find it without more information.
What's your name?
Can you post the interview or its transcripts?
You also said we "will just have to wait" for answers until your book comes out.
What's its name and when did it come out?
Waiting with bated breath for your response to my questions.
b017ni3 5 months ago
You will find that he knew it all and even this is part of his act.
lumeriam 8 months ago
I mean if giuliani himself couldn't get out in time, how would the firefighters have gotten out, if they found out after giuliani?
robedwards3693 9 months ago
Comment removed
ehealthy222 10 months ago
Comment removed
ehealthy222 10 months ago
WHy 911?
War Industry, US Govt Drug Industry, To waste money to collapse the dollar, To control oil, to position themselves closer to china and Pakistan and Iran, all for the glory of the new world order. Us sovereignty is gone, the world elites in the banking families
jiminiflix 2 years ago
Ghouliani knew the building was going to collapse but never warned the firefighters. They died because of him.
thequake180 2 years ago 2
What happened to the footage on here of R.G. telling FOX that building 7 was coming down?Haven't been able to find it for awhile.
obamacommie1984 2 years ago
Total dirtbag pos.
nothwind 2 years ago
Who knew the building was going to fall before it did, and warn the pig......? Only another bigger pig.
nothwind 2 years ago
You guys all misinterpreted him. He said he "went down to the scene" (that means he went to the towers). He went there because they were already struck and unstable. It was then that one of the authorities informed him that the building would collapse, then he and everyone else evacuated but it came down before they could, which means he didn't have any more forewarning that anybody else.
MicroDreamz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The NIST theory or correctly stated "Theories" has been proven by numerous scienctists...Here's one link that explain the falsehood in the bowing theory
heiwaco. tripod. com/nist7. htm
freein2339 3 years ago
..Somehow I cant post a response.!!???..I guess they dont want me to answer that last questions..Well with a dem admin and a conservative admin in Canada....I wonder if once the party loses that the people go to jail??..Nixon did not go to jail...In some countries they hang losing parties..Sore winners I guess..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
I thought it was supposed to be after the KSM trial..If they dont want the media to release it they cant..something to do with the evidence maybe..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Do you think the public will get a different view of the "official" version , thereby resulting in someone or someones from the Bush administration going to jail...??
freein2339 3 years ago
..I think they would accept it..I dont know what to think about the Bush Admin..To some he is crude others they like the John Wayne type.Back after 911 the country neede that type..The public approved of him then..Obama now has alot of repairing to do.Tolerance is what is needed now..As for going to Jail,,anyone can go..everyone is treated equally.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Since the Bush administration has been lying to us about 911 , why would the country "need" him..To spread more lies so we could then go to Iraq...???...Somebody in his administration should be in jail..That includes Bush , Cheney , Rice , Ashcroft or whoever else was involved with the cover up of 911 and the "manufactured" reasons for going to Iraq....
freein2339 3 years ago
@blueshadow1996 so americans "saw"Bush like a crude John Wayne type? thats interesting
the rest of the west sees him like .. a stupid .silly..non intelligent ..joke kind of person and a hypocrite with no personal value puppet(regardless the fact he is seen as heartless too)/sorry/Very far from the john wayne type
delagrazia 10 months ago
@delagrazia So different from the opinion of the American ppl.Because he was the type of leader needed back then..Now its a new chapter in American history..From slavery to manifest destiny..Democracy is not as clean as ppl think..John Wayne was known for phrases like"The only Indian is a dead Indian"..except Bush was saying the only good terrorist is a dead one..Same tune..
blueshadow1996 10 months ago
Well I have more work to do..good luck in your research freein2339..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
I'm just dealing with the truth my man...just dealing with the truth...
freein2339 3 years ago
tell you what..after they release my name to the public.I will give you an interview for being so persistant..later
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
And when will your name be released..???
freein2339 3 years ago
from the top floor down? I thought demos start from the bottom to the top and have a blast..Silent explosion?..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
FDNY Captain Dennis Tardio,
speaking of the south tower, said: I hear an explosion and I look
up. It is as if the building is being imploded, from the top floor
down, one after another, boom, boom, boom.
freein2339 3 years ago
They were told not to discuss the facts because an investigation was underway.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Multiple explosions were also reported by Teresa Veliz, She was on the 47th floor, she reported, when suddenly the whole building
shook. .the building shook again, this time
even more violently. Then, while Veliz was making her way downstairs
and outside: There were explosions going off everywhere. I was
convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and
someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator
buttons. . . .
freein2339 3 years ago
There were many
reports about an explosion in the basement of the north tower. For
example, janitor William Rodriguez reported that he and others felt
an explosion below the first sub-level office at 9 AM, after which co-
worker Felipe David, who had been in front of a nearby freight
elevator, came into the office with severe burns on his face and arms
yelling explosion! explosion! explosion!
freein2339 3 years ago
I saw a flash flash, flash [at] the lower level of the building. You
know like when they demolish a building? Assistant Fire
Commissioner Stephen Gregory
-----------------------------------------
It was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges
on certain floors and then you hear Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop.
Paramedic Daniel Rivera
freein2339 3 years ago
what does all of this have to do with this video of the OEM being warned?
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
"I said, Chief, they're evacuating the other building; right? He said, No. . . . I said, Why not? They blew up the other one. I thought they blew it up with a bomb. I said, If they blew up the one, you know they're gonna blow up the other one. He said, No, they're not. I said, Well, you gotta tell them to evacuate it, because it's gonna fall down and you gotta get the guys out.
freein2339 3 years ago
He said, I'm just the Battalion Chief. I can't order that. . . . I said, You got a fucking radio and you got a fucking mouth. Use the fucking things. Empty this fucking building. Again he said, I'm just a Battalion Chief. I can't do that. . . . Eventually this other chief came back and said, They are evacuating this tower. . . . And sometime after that . . . I watched the north tower fall." [William Reynolds - Firefighter]
freein2339 3 years ago
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but theyre afraid for their jobs to admit it because the higher-ups forbid discussion of this fact. Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Departments Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. There were definitely bombs in those buildings, he told me.
freein2339 3 years ago
You were talkin with him?.Try asking about a call,they will only say radio problems kept them from hearing the evacuation.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
How did you kno the buildings were going to be imploded..??
freein2339 3 years ago
"At that point, a debate began to rage because. . . many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade, and officers were gathering companies together and the officers were debating whether or not to go immediately back in or to see what was going to happen with 1 World Trade at that point. The debate ended pretty quickly because 1 World Trade came down." [Christopher Fenyo - Firefighter]
freein2339 3 years ago
I guess you will just have to wait for my book..it will include avery and his bunch..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
"I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions." [Craig Carlsen -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.)]
freein2339 3 years ago
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
freein2339 3 years ago
BUt there was no explosion..no one saw a blast and the building started bowing first..I never saw any explosions wating for it to almost fall.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Firefighter Schroeder recollects in great detail how he was one of the first firefighters to rush to the complex. We first assembled on West Street, where we saw someone burnt beyond recognition. We were like What is going on here? and then went straight into the Marriot building From there, Firefighter Schroeder made his way to the lobby of the North Tower. It looked like a bomb went off, and we started making our way up the stairs to rescue as many people as we could.
freein2339 3 years ago
Firefighter Schroeder made it all the way up to the 23rd floor before barely hearing on the failing radios that another plane was coming in. That plane would hit the South Tower though for some reason We were tossed like a rag doll by another explosion in our building. People were making there way down the stairwells burnt like you couldnt believe. We were all shocked because it seemed as if there was fire everywhere, on so many floors. It just didnt make sense.
freein2339 3 years ago
Lou Cacchioli, Firefighter in WTC 1: At that point, Cacchioli found one of the only functioning elevators, one only going as high as the 24th floor .. "Tommy Hetzel was with me and everybody else also gets out of the elevator when it stops on the 24th floor," said Cacchioli, "There was a huge amount of smoke. Tommy and I had to go back down the elevator for tools and no sooner did the elevators close behind us, we heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb.
freein2339 3 years ago
It was such a loud noise, it knocked off the lights and stalled the elevator.
"Luckily, we weren't caught between floors and were able to pry open the doors. People were going crazy, yelling and screaming. And all the time, I am crawling low and making my way in the dark with a flashlight to the staircase and thinking Tommy is right behind me. "I somehow got into the stairwell and there were more people there.
freein2339 3 years ago
When I began to try and direct down, another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later, although it's hard to tell, but I'm thinking, 'Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993!'
freein2339 3 years ago
those beaam were the ones exposed to flame..You can weaken steel with only firewood...how do you think blacksmiths did their work?..with pressure from a hammer and softend steel..they could punch holes in it,twist it.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Did you know that there were a large number of independent reports (many from firefighters who were familiar with such phenomena) indicating that people heard a collection of explosions, along with flashes, prior to the collapse of the twin towers -- reports which are consistent with what is known as a "demolition ring" -- that is a series of explosions running around a building during a controlled demolition or implosion?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that for the most part, evidence indicates that the non-metallic portions of the three WTC buildings which collapsed were pulverized into relatively small particles rather than the much larger chunks of concrete one would expect to find if the "official" story concerning the collapsed buildings were true?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that if the government's "officially-adopted pancake theory" were true, there very likely would have been massive, largely intact, steel columns -- both core and perimeter -- that still would be standing (albeit, possibly, bent and twisted a little) from the 110 storey original structures and that these steel columns would likely extend upward many, many stories into the sky rather than having collapsed into a relatively small, compact, several storey-high heap of wreckage?
freein2339 3 years ago
and, in addition, there is absolutely zero evidence that any of the core steel columns were subjected to temperatures even as high as 482 degrees of Fahrenheit?
freein2339 3 years ago
Wow how many different people typing?..Welding must be magic for you ppl..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Did you know that there is absolutely no evidence that any of the 47 or 24 massive core columns in the three WTC buildings that collapsed were subjected to the sort of intense heat for extended periods of time which would have been necessary to weaken those columns?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that of the 16 perimeter beams from the World Trade Center that were examined, only three showed evidence of having been subjected to temperatures higher than 482 degrees Fahrenheit (far below the 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit needed to structurally weaken steel provided that the steel is heated for a a sufficiently long enough period at such an elevated temperature)
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that all three of the World Trade Center buildings which collapsed did so at very close to free-fall rates of speed (i.e., free fall would occur if one were to drop an apple off the top of any of these buildings and there was nothing, but air, resisting the fall of this body)?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that besides lacking any actual evidence to substantiate the NIST theory for building collapse, the NIST theory cannot explain either the quality of near free-fall speeds of the collapse of the three WTC buildings nor can that theory explain the symmetrical footprint property of all three collapsing WTC buildings --
freein2339 3 years ago
in fact, the NIST theory would only be consistent with a non-free-fall-like collapse which was very asymmetrical ... neither of which was observed in the collapsing WTC buildings?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that the "official" pancake theory adopted by the government would not have reduced the concrete portions of the three WTC buildings to powder but, instead, would have yielded much larger chunks of concrete because the energy generated through the force of gravity of uncontrolled collapsing buildings would not have been sufficient to be able to produce pulverized powder particles?
freein2339 3 years ago
...what do you think concrete comes from??sand,water,and cement..If you take a sledge hammer you can break concrete.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Did you know that the same high explosives which are used to slice up the core and peripheral steel columns of a skyscraper are powerful enough to reduce all non-metallic components of the building (such as poured concrete) into powder?
freein2339 3 years ago
I am not tlking bout getting it whitehot to melt it,it need only get redhot,which cna be done on a kitchen stove.or a small torch....There were evacuation orders inplace issued by the OEM.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Did you know that although the south tower of the WTC was hit second, suffered less structural damage than the north tower, and exhibited fewer fires than the north tower, nonetheless, the south tower collapsed first, some 56 minutes after being struck by the airplane?
freein2339 3 years ago
How did you know the WTC towers were going to be imploded..??
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that tests were carried out in Great Britain during the 1990s in order to investigate the extent of damage which might occur if steel beam structures were enveloped in high-intensity heat (1500 - 1700 degrees Fahrenheit) for many hours (4), and no collapse of the steel beams was observed in any of these experiments?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that video and photographic evidence indicates that when the south tower started to collapse, the collapse began at a point much lower than the point where the airplane struck the building and much lower than where fires were burning?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that in order for steel to melt, the steel would have to be exposed to a sustained source of, at least, 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit ... brief or very limited exposure to such high temperatures is not enough?
freein2339 3 years ago
it went...For the benifit of everyone else.the flames annealed the steel and the weight smashed to floor underneath the crash site..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Did you know that steel starts to melt around 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit, but hydrocarbon fires arising from, say, burning jet fuel would not reach more than 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit ... or 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit less than what would have been necessary to melt any one section of the 47/24 core columns of the three respective buildings,
freein2339 3 years ago
or the 236/57 perimeter columns of the three buildings, let alone all 47/24 of the core columns or all 236/57 of the perimeter columns of the three World Trade Center buildings?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that some experts who support the government's "official story" concerning the events of 9/11 say that if steel is heated to a temperature of 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit, the steel will lose 80 percent of its strength?
freein2339 3 years ago
But, did you know that these same experts tend to leave out the fact that one would have to subject such steel to a very, very high source of heat for a considerable period of time in order to heat even one portion of a massive column of steel to 1300 degrees Fahrenheit?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know if one were to heat one section of a steel column that heat transfer would tend to radiate away some of the heat from the section being heated, thereby, making it harder to attain and sustain 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit at any given point?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that in 2004 a fire raged for 17 hours in a 54-story steel-frame building in Caracas, Venezuela and that the intensity of the fire was such that it completely gutted the top 23 stories of the building, and, yet, the building did not collapse?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that in 1991 a fire burned in a steel-structure building (One Meridian Plaza) in Philadelphia for 18 hours with such intensity that 8 out of 38 stories were gutted and even though many of the building's beams and girders sagged and twisted due to being exposed to the intense heat for such a long period of time, yet, the building did not collapse?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that less than 15 minutes after the second of the twin towers was hit, photographs of the towers, as well as the testimony of both firefighters and people temporarily trapped in those buildings, indicate that the fires in the buildings were only scattered and slight, as well as not being even sufficiently hot, in most places, to either melt or break the exterior glass of the buildings?
freein2339 3 years ago
Did you know that although the south tower of the WTC was hit second, suffered less structural damage than the north tower, and exhibited fewer fires than the north tower, nonetheless, the south tower collapsed first, some 56 minutes after being struck by the airplane?
freein2339 3 years ago
..wont be able to post much longer..is that you daniiels news deleting the posts??
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
why is it hard to beleive the fire weakend the steel and it broke underneath the impact zone because the steel had fireproofing knocked off and flame weakned it..Consider a blacksmith only has to get the steel red hot too shape it on the anvil..That was alot of pressure on those beams..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
blueshadow
Because jet fuel does not melt steel ...The WTC was imploded why can't you understand the facts..???
freein2339 3 years ago
.it never melted,,got red hot and lost its abilty to hold the floors on top,smashing each floor like a shotgun slug blasting its way down always increasing power....
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Do you really believe that nonsense or do you WANT to believe it...First of all the steel didn't get 'red hot"..That could only be done in a furnace not in a building with most of the heat going out of the window..The fuel was not hot enough , check it out...
freein2339 3 years ago
Do I have to beleive it? The steel was red hot and you could see it.Even as it fell you could see the flame..If they did not beleive me than all the press and triage would still have been at the base of the towers..Yes I was the one who called ,but many of you dont know who I was talking with..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
The firemen actually reported that they encounter molten steel that can only be produced from Thermite with is used in controlled demolitions...The steel was cut by the explosives that caused the WTC towers to fall..It is not possible for jet fuel to melt steel...Not in this universe...
freein2339 3 years ago
no one said it melted steel.Ask any blacksmith ,welder or gunsmith how easily steel breaks after it gets red hot and slowly cools..Which firemen actually said they found molten steel..There are reasons for many things and you could tell the attackers wanted the towers to fall on the people creating as much terror as they can..From experience wrking with steel I knew the towers will fall..So I called..notice an evac happening after the second tower was hit?..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
The evac happened because the tower was hit not because they thought the towers were going to fall...The fireman actually said that the fire would have under control with no problem...And they heard a series of explosions in the towers right they fell..The reason the buildings fell is because they were imploded just like WTC7 was imploded...Face it man , the "official" version sounds like a fairy tale that keeps changing...Lies have a way of doing that...
freein2339 3 years ago
there are facts about who called and when the call happened..I have spoken with NIST and the RCMP up here about why I called..I dont have to face anything because I know about the events..the problem is many people have never worked with steel yet they seem to have the same story except their own version..If there was a planned explosion then it would have made me part of it..Instead of being part of the rescue..NYPD,FDNY,CSIS,RCMP and the CIA know who I am..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
It's apparent that "they' didn't need you to be part of it..Whoever or whatever you are doesn't matter since you can't explain all the holes in the "official" version...Why not deal with the truth..??? And why do you ignore what happen at WTC7 ..???
freein2339 3 years ago
And you dont think it was me he was talking about in his interview with Jennings.What about the other buildings that were destroyed because the tower fell on them..WTC7 is where they were going to set up a triage,they had too move it and evryone from the tower.7 came down and the fiefighters were ordered to stay clear as they knew it was collapsing..because of fire..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
Bullshit...WTC7 fell because it was imploded not because of a few small fires...You can keep fooling yourself all you like or you can defend the bullshit "official" version of 911 , which keeps changing by the way , all you want..The facts are very easy to see that 911 was an inside job...Anybody with a little common sense can see that...
freein2339 3 years ago
But you cant see it? You must have some common sense..At least a little..You probably never worked with steel..If I did not go to the Commission hearing,its my choice..I did my part then.I saw your site,no sign of a person who works woth his mind or muscle.Loose change did not want to hear my story,because yhey had already released their film.
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
You didn't go to "my site" because I don't have one..The NIST never stated how the WTC7 building fell..It was imploded , just like the twin towers were imploded..You can see the demolition explosions as the buildings fell..I know you are trying to protect ther Bush administration but I have a little too much honesty and common sense to fall for your "version"...I have better luck with the truth....
freein2339 3 years ago
..I should have said channel.I have no need to protect any admin,I would not be surprised if the Obama admin pays me a visit next month. I am privy to some events,I always thought the American ppl knew..They treat me so different since then,police use to always look at me like I must have done something wrong..Since 9/11/01 they wave and even help if I am stuck on the side of the road..Th Xmas cards I got plus the invitation from Condi Rice to meet the pres..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
What does that have to do with all the evidence pointing to an inside job of 911...From the WTC towers to the Pentagon , the "official" is full of lies...Don't you "see" that..???
freein2339 3 years ago
Evrything the NYPD did on that day in NYC shows they followed my instructions.They knew when both towers were going to collapse and ordered everyone out of the building.Somehow the disabled people who were left on the 12th floor were being rescued by the FDNY..No one seems to evr mention that..
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
How did you know the buildings were going to be imploded..???
freein2339 3 years ago
60636 dec 30 2008
1madason 3 years ago
I guess youre right. Guiliani knew the building was rigged to explode and was kind enough to let the whole world know too.
It's so clear to me now. Thank God for Youtube.
Spectre11B 3 years ago
Because he's speaking after the fact! Cmon man it doesnt even make sense to say after the fact that the building might come down when we know for a fact that it did.
Even before the building the fell, I THOUGHT it was coming down ALSO. Nobody told me, it was common sense! Since it did happen, my suspicion were reaffirmed, so I would be justified in saying, I knew the building was coming down because it did.
Spectre11B 3 years ago
When was it against the law to think a building might collapse after being hit by a plane and on fire?
Spectre11B 3 years ago
lol Confession? He thought the building might fall down, and somehow thats a confession that he believed the building was rigged by a super secret government organization in order to dupe the United States into going to war to further the Agenda of the New World Order....
Or he speculated like everyone else, that the building was on fire and it might collapse. Guess we are all going to jail for thinking the same thing.
Spectre11B 3 years ago
If he was willing to say that then, why doesn't he admit it now?
Did he magically grow a conscience or is he no longer an idiot?
Spectre11B 3 years ago
What idiot would admit on national television or radio that he knew the World trade center was rigged to explode. It doesnt even pass the common sense test.
Spectre11B 3 years ago
And to think that this fruitcake actually had the gull to run for president.
And even worse, alot of nitwits even voted for him.
WTF is this country coming to?
fanbutton 3 years ago
pms
daonlyray 3 years ago
apparently he was told by Dick Cheney. How the fuck did Cheney know.......? Total inside job.
nothwind 3 years ago
This video doesnt even pass the common sense test.
Spectre11B 3 years ago
pure hollywood
Emin7 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
if you doubt the nwo then type this in. a picnic at port arthur: the port arthur massacre. it changed the gun laws of an entire nation in one foul swoop. australia's.
basho81 3 years ago
911 was planned so you idiots will support war becouse war is a big buiseness and money goes from your pockets into the government pockets im gonna do you creeps a favor and tell you this once
yhx1000000 4 years ago
1. I guess you have no source? Please explain the intercept process of our ADIZ's. How does it work? Who is responsible? You keep avoiding as if your don't really know.
2. Why are you avoiding any attempt to answer my questions? Is it that you don't know or they didn't tell you how to answer? Are you going to avoid them for ever?
Nobody heard "bombs". They heard explosions which could be from a variety of sources. Not a single person heard explosives, just explosions, there is a difference.
shooter686 4 years ago
Too bad Rudy did not get killed.
Addison5000 4 years ago 2
Since no similar structure has ever collapsed due to fire damage, how did someone know in advance that this was going to happen, and who was it that informed Giuliani that it was about to happen?
Why is there evidence that appears to show that the Towers were intentionally demolished?
Why were Jews warned to vacate the Towers, but Christians were not?
Live414 4 years ago
3 lies and a anti-Semetic statement? You must be a Sheep 1st Class for the so-called "truth movement".
Liars and bigots join forces to attack Israel and the US govt. Imagine that.
shooter686 4 years ago
I dare you to point out the 'anti-semitic' part? My god, you folks are out of control with this 'anti-semtic' accusations.
nadoop 4 years ago
Perhaps Rudy was saying that after the first tower collapsed, they warned him about it that the other one will probably also collapse. Remember, there was some point that the higher command decided to pull out emergency personnel from the tower that would fall, although the message didn't get through unfortunately.
pfpalya 4 years ago
I agree that he could have been talking about the second Tower after the first one collapsed. Try to use more credible evidence for the 9/11 truth movement - this kind of stuff just takes away from the real evidence. Stick to the facts, not conjecture.
skygal12 4 years ago
To the previous fool, G-d has nothing to do with "nostradamus" some false prophet of the new age cults. Half of that stuff is doctored and fake, the rest didn't come true. Real prophecy found in the bible has come true and will come true.
pfpalya 4 years ago
There's no such thing as real prophecy from any source, people just have a way of bringing around what they want to believe is supposed to happen.
grenadier33 4 years ago 2
Rudy- who informed you of this??? He denied that he ever said this by the way- check the video out on youtube.
NyDerekJeter2 4 years ago
Could we find out dear GULIANI who warned you?
It obviously was not the FDNY.. ironicaly the people who were in the building and most capable of deciding whether the tower was at risk of collapse.. after all they are trained to make those decisions anyway...I would have informed the firefighters to get out first. :) Who was this informer???
realistromeo 4 years ago
probably cia
stonereflex 4 years ago
Well he was not warned first,but people acted. After the election I am sure you will find out who warned them. Informer or concerned citizen.
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
Are Hilary or Obama going to make this a presidential election issue? I would like to see the winning democratic candidate promise an independent investigation if elected.
timtak1 4 years ago 2
lol sorry but you'll NEVER see that from Hilary... (nor Obama, but then, he isnt the new pres)
stonereflex 4 years ago
It now seems that Obama is going to be the new President.
timtak1 3 years ago 2
How did he know that a steel building would turn into rubble by fire? That is Impossible!
TGWMPE 4 years ago
Impossible? I guess you got your degree from a CT website? Oh wait, you became an expert by reading the internet. This is how 99% of CT experts get their info.
Remember, it must be true, it was found on the internet/youtube.
shooter686 4 years ago
A little lesson to you free of charge:
9/11 = CONSPIRACY
OBL did it = CONSPIRACY THEORY
US Government did it = CONSPIRACY THEORY
In other words, you too are a CONSPIRACY THEORIST, you ignorant sheep. It's just a matter of which conspiracy theory is easier to swallow. And in this case, it's the government's version.
I'm up for the US government challenging the American thinkers who KNOW that the American government killed its own people. But I doubt they would...
nadoop 4 years ago
Actually, if you are forced to try semantics as a basis for your argument, you have already lost.
Well, show us this proof of how you "know" it was the US govt that did it.
So far there hasn't been a single piece of evidence to pass the first round in ANY US court. Why is this? ZERO!!
shooter686 4 years ago
Semantics MY ASS. It is what it is. And conspiracy theorists has been given a new definition in an attempt to marginalize, and ultimately silence thinkers who refuse to accept lies from our evil government.
And there is plenty of evidence to counter the highly false 'official' story of what really happened. Too bad you're too much of a pussy to accept it for what it is. Slave.
nadoop 4 years ago
Other than resorting to childish name-calling and equally juvenile semantics games, do you happen to have any this so-called "evidence" that would pass the Rules of Evidence in ANY court in this country?
Keep in mind, canned talking points are not considered evidence.
shooter686 4 years ago
ALSO - how do you expect criminals to investigate themselves? The fact it, the government has yet to confront us skeptics, therefore why would you expect anything, other than the lie, in court? Wake the fck up and stop being a slave.
I can understand you're afraid to even consider the possibility of your government being evil, but it's either now or never. WAKE UP, SHEEP!
nadoop 4 years ago
Actually, I am doing very well as a citizen of this country. So, I am certainly not a slave to anyone.
I also don't need a child to tell me what stories I need to believe since he is limited to CT websites and other non journalistic sources.
In other words, none of your claims can hold up to other experts in architecture, engineering, demolition, and/or explosives.
I can see why you are being ignored. You have nothing to say that matters.
shooter686 4 years ago
The best way to enslave a population is to make them think they're free. Face it: you're a SLAVE.
And the fact that you believe the same 'journalists' that lied to the population proves that you're a SLAVE.
SAY CT one millionth time, it won't stop the movement.
CT
CT
Keep saying it. You're a slave.
nadoop 4 years ago
So, in what way are you a slave?
Also, when I referred to "journalistic", I was referring to professional journals, not newspapers. I should have assumed you wouldn't have known at your age.
So, why are you so offended by being called a CTist? Does it infer that you believe anything spoon fed to you by a person from the internet that wishes to make money from you?
So, who is your hero? Alex Jones? Griffin?
shooter686 4 years ago
1. Professional journals like?
2. I believed 9/11 was an inside job from the day it happened.
3. I'm not offended by you calling me a CT, because - like you, that is what I am. 9/11 skeptics have our own theories since we don't believe the bullshit government theory. I'm just offended by the fact that you're so clueless to believe conspiracy theorists are bad. In fact, that makes you sound very unintelligent.
nadoop 4 years ago
1. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Fire Engineering, Civil Engineering ASCE, Journal of Acoustical Society of America, & Journal of Engineering Mechanics.
2. Typical lie from most CTists. I have heard this from so many people I laugh every time.
3. Then why bring up a childish semantics argument? Tinfoil types like yourself are what gives humor to the rest of the scientific and military world. Based on your lack of education, I find it VERY funny to hear of your opinions on intelligence.
shooter686 4 years ago
1. Many of these journals have already been exposed for lying AND/OR withholding information to further their cause.
2. I don't expect you to cry. I mean, you have not yet come to the realization that you're a slave. And your laughing is simply a defense mechanism, which I don't fully blame you for. In order to feel protected, you must block all truth from entering your head.
3. If speaking the truth about what a ct is is childish, then what does that make you?
nadoop 4 years ago
The fact is, PNAC predicted a catastropic event years before 9/11/2001. It was to happen in order to increase US military presense in the Middle East and secure vast resources.
Also, since 9/11:
1. They have yet to capture Osama.
2. They have yet to find the so-called wmd's in Iraq.
3. They are building a huge embassy in Iraq, with a pool and everything, as if that is what they told us they were going in there for. And the occupation of Iraq could not be done without 9/11.
nadoop 4 years ago
And experts are saying just that: 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. It was nothing our trillion dollar defense system couldn't handle.
Have you listened to both sides of the story, or did you quickly dismiss one conspiracy theory, while accepting the other? If so, then you're a dishonest slave who obviously will believe whatever your government tells you.
Afterall, we would not be occupying Iraq right now, and building a huge embassy IF 9/11 didn't happen. Wake up!
nadoop 4 years ago
Our "trillion dollar defense system" was not designed for domestic attacks. I'm sure since your military experience is based on XBox, you wouldn't have known that.
I have read almost every point the CTists have made about 9-11 and laugh at their ignorance.
Imagine a professor that hasn't left the classroom in 20 years telling me about incendiary devices that have NEVER been used in demolition.
Or a Professor of Folklore telling me about explosive demolition.
Which is funnier???
shooter686 4 years ago
1. Our defense system i snot designed for domestic attacks? You're kidding, right? I truly hope you are.
2. I'm curious to know which theories are you disagreeing with. I'd love 'laugh at the ignorance' as well.
nadoop 4 years ago
1. You have a source for your basis of this comment? By the case you put it in, you are guessing, it seems. Please, tell me what you know about our defense system and your sources of this claim.
2. ANY claim that the 9-11 was done by anything other than 19 hijackers. ANY claim that there were explosives in any building at GZ. ANY claim to the US being a part of the attack. Any claim that the CIA was a part of the attack. ANY claim that you give without bona fide evidence.
shooter686 4 years ago
1. What source, 'tard? You wasn't aware of many defense entities, such as NORAD, that exist to protect our skies?
2. That about says it all. You have been programmed to reject ANY claim regarding 9/11, so long as it's not about those box cutters.
And I bet the witnesses who heard bombs in the building were all delusional? Even the ones who ran down the steps to find the lobby totally blown away? Get a grip on reality, man/woman!
nadoop 4 years ago
Shooter must be on the government purse !
wendandy 4 years ago
Typical canned response when you have ZERO facts and ZERO brains to debate as a grown up.
What makes me think you are a paid sheep for those that are making money on the backs of the extremely gullible? Because they don't need to pay anyone. there will always be useful idiots like you to do their work for them as they cash in their ad checks.
Anytime you find some facts to debate, let's see them. Canned talking points are your downfall so far.
shooter686 4 years ago
Luckily I live in Australia and get to watch all of this from outside your media and hype. This was the greatest tragedy I think I will ever witness in my lifetime and to just put the "blinkers" on as we say, and not question the garbage your fed, is stupidity. The FACTS are there for all to see. You obviously believe what you are told - and yes, there are fairies at the bottom of the garden !
wendandy 4 years ago
Well, if the "facts" are there to be seen, then show us.
In the US, we have a system of laws that dictate what is real evidence and what is fake. So far, there has been ZERO items entered into ANY court case that pass the rules of evidence.
Why is that? Could it be that CT websites are not considered evidence? What about guesses? Conjecture? Non-exert opinions? Presumptions?
shooter686 4 years ago
FACT! US citizens do not have any right to sue a sitting President, based on the "Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity" - no matter how much evidence you have !!
There will always be, as you call them "conspiracy theories". All theories must be evaluated by an external independant body. Jesus !, The Official Report on 9/11 is a theory as well remember !!
Strange how they left Building 7 out of the Official Report..Whoooops !
wendandy 4 years ago
The "official" report did not have the task to cover WTC 7. Whooops!
Maybe you should wonder why the "official report" didn't cover WTC's 4, 5, & 6 either. Since you have ZERO facts to back up your claims, you will always be thought of as a CTists since all CT's are backed up with guesses and no facts.
So, when you gather up all your evidence, let me see your federal filing on 21 Jan 2009. There are about a million of us that need a good laugh.
shooter686 4 years ago
3 Buildings fell that day..remember!!! Building 7 was admitedly "pulled" and thats why it was left out of the report. At least 50% of americans will agree with me. Just because you dont is your opinion and i'll let you have that, everyone should.
It just seems strange that you question "NOTHING" of the unprecedented events of that day.
wendandy 4 years ago
"pulled"??? Really? I find it strange that you know nothing about explosive demolition, yet you somehow believe that "pull" is a demo industry term meaning to use explosives to destroy a building. Why? Because someone with just a little experience told you? Is this how conspiracies work? Some makes up a story and then tells other people so they tell the same story even though it is clearly a lie?
Also, who said it was "pulled"? Show me the quote. This will be funny!!
shooter686 4 years ago
Silverstein ...simple!
This will be funny, what do you think he meant?....I can't wait.
wendandy 4 years ago
He was referring to pulling the fire fighting effort. This was corroborated by him and the Fire chief he was referring to.
Since you are limited to a few CT websites, for your "research", you wouldn't have known that. It's OK, this is common for those that believe these little tales of conspiracy.
Did you find your source for the "pull it" industry terms? Still waiting. Actually, I know you can't find it because it doesn't exist. I'll let you stew over it, though.
shooter686 4 years ago
So the fire fighting effort was called "IT". Nice theory! You think he would have said "the smartest thing to do is get our firefighters out of the building".
The FACTS are blatant and if you chose to ignore them, so be it !
Anyone who reads our posts can see your thought process, so i'll leave it up to the readers. Watch the live videos and interviews with ordinary people and firefighters who were there and "make up your own mind !!!". Dont just be told what to think.
wendandy 4 years ago
That was what he intended. Maybe he didn't feel he had the time to sparse his words correctly. I'm sure you as a Monday morning QB would like to use that as a basis. He didn't.
Your so-called facts are fake and are not "blatant". They are made up and you have proven this time and time again. Especially with your mind reading attempt at what Silverstein said and meant.
Did you find that evidence I asked for or are you going to avoid it as if it never existed?
shooter686 4 years ago
Theres no point, I cant make a blind man see if he doesn't want to. Let us keep our own opinions, we still have that right!.
Oh, I forgot to tell you, the earth really is round.... you used to be killed for saying that too.
wendandy 4 years ago
So you admit you can't and/or wont.
This is common when CTists can't answer such simple questions. You dodge, avoid, change the subject, and anything you can do to not answer such a simple question.
I figured you couldn't answer. You just proved to me that you are all talking points and no specifics.
shooter686 4 years ago
Quote: "You dodge, avoid, change the subject, and anything you can do to not answer such a simple question."
Are we talking about your president here.?
The catch phrases "weapons of mass destuction & conspiracy theory" have a lot in common - they were both made up by your goverment!
Enjoy debunking anything you can get your hands on, it seems to be your mission in life. It would be easier to have a discussion with a brick with a pocket full of one sided coins. ....next.
wendandy 4 years ago 2
"Are we talking about your president here.?"
I see you have now changed the subject once again. Are all your posts going to be this childish?
I'm glad you cannot debate as an adult.
We in America laugh at those kind of people. Whenever we hear Elvis sightings, crop circles, chem trails, and 9-11 conspiracies, we all get a good laugh.
Since you are in another country, you won't get to enjoy the irony of you trying to convince me of my govt.
shooter686 4 years ago
Not only do you have Rudy admitting foreknowledge but you have Larry Sliverstein confessing to having the building PULLED.Couple that with Rudy almost giving the WTC to Larry and the big insurance payoff and -Well - I smell a big fat rat.
clint525fuller 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The real Rudy revealed:
watch?v=5Az_qADGcL4
What a piece of shit
Romulus2009 4 years ago
Which Presidential Candidates are for One World Government and Open Borders?
Who is a CFR / NAU Member?
Fred Thompson / Rudy Giuliani / Mitt Romney / John McCain / Jim Gilmore / Newt Gingrich / Hilary Clinton / Barack Obama / John Edwards / Joe Biden / Chris Dodd /
Bill Richardson
Go to the CFR website - Check the membership and involvement of candidates. See For Yourself!!
callumonit 4 years ago 7
Word.
tspinkham 4 years ago
Here you have foreknowledge of the events in his own words. The bunker was abandoned early and the power was shut off (although the backup systems can on). They all knew the building was going to be demolished. In fact Rudi moved in with the FEMA folks who just happened to be doing practice runs the day before. Coincidence?????
guesswhotoo6 4 years ago
Activist and Journalist Alex Jones predicted this.
Do a YouTube search of "Alex Jones Predicts 9-11". Interesting.
The underground 4 hr video of the 9-11 event has so much truth, people just cannot handle it, even when it is put before them.
heidiklinden 4 years ago
Predicted 9/11? Its amazing do you even know what he said? "I predict that the NWO will use CIA Cell operative OBL to conduct some kind of attack against the US." He had already bombed embassies. He bombed a Naval ship. He was on a roll so another attack was sure to happen. Nostradamus anyone?
JackJivewriter 4 years ago