Added: 2 years ago
From: MikeJustesenFilms
Views: 21,731
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (161)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the 1st song was you like me too much not I need you!

  • nice

  • @johnnyappleseedism

    Yes, Paul and Linda were married in '69 as were, John & Yoko!

  • The lyric from love you too, is a new one CAN'T be bought

  • this is good

  • Get your fact correct,dude. I would do it again.............

  • Amusing.

  • Wow.. u way over analyzed this. Paul sold his soul to the devil. Thats it. Probly made sum sacrifices an his times coming

  • aload of shit x

  • at the begining of the song When we was fab we hear "One, Two" and the song begin. Its like if its refering to the last real beatles member, George and Ringo

  • The whole Faul shit is just so unbelievable, even if there was an amazing look a like, he would never have Paul's voice, wake up people, HE'S ALIVE AND WELL!

  • OH bloody hell, If you want there to be a message in ANYTHING you reverse, echo,listen to until your mind bleeds you WILL find it, and convince yourself its real. The mind can play tricks, and a mind can blow those clouds away, its your choice. Tread carefully down this path, yout mind may not show you the way back.

  • Conspiracy believers can hear subterfuge in everything they hear.

    In psychology it is called transference.

  • @howne44 James Paul McCartney was replaced in late 1966. The man that replaced him was not just some look-a-like who sounded like JP McCartney. No, Billy is a product of th occult. All of Crowely's teachings were applied, a strict abidance to The Book Of The Law. But don't worry, the truth will be told... blatently that is (for it has been told in coded form since the revolver turned). It is hard to accept at first but in the end you will accept it. It is the absolute truth. I am an expert.

  • Dear Mike. you are a *sshole! #1. Pre 1667?!? I didn't know The Beatles were over 300 years old. #2. That's not 'I Need You' it is 'You Like Me Too Much' #3. 'Only a Northern Song' was written as a slap to the face of Northern Songs Ltd. who owned the copyrights to Harrisons' songs, he only was allowed a small % of it.

  • @nanakistrife Dear Nana-something, thank you very much for your kind words. As i stated 5.000.000 times, i rushed this episode, and sadly i left some MAJOR texting errors i never fixed. Yes it is lazy, but too bad. Got 17.000 views, so it kinda did something correctly. Please notice the annotations next time. Will help you a lot, before making an ass out of yourself.

  • @howne44 Again, I repeat: some in this video not related to Paul, but a few later clues do exist from Harrison: Blue Jay Way front&back contains same msg in 1 section, & John Bday = real .etc -- I looked @yr vid. So go 2 site I suggested. I swear u'll recognize the pix (so u'll know they're not distorted). U need to notice how in some head conditions is no similarity; in some there is.Thats howyr brain was tricked. htp only1rad .proboards . com /index.cgi?board=plastic&actio­n=display&thread=1399

  • @howne44 Howne, where say I clips not genuine? I said orig. Macca is a bit TV-distorted -- common from glare &format. I pointed out HOW to set up -- physically, or in yr mind -- forensic exam. U must consider limited # of proportion items in bone structure, from as undistorted photos as possible. Only a few proportions @a time (for instance, consider similar tilts of head but if jaws open, save that analysis for closed-mouth comp. set). Inner eyes (tearduct) must match & angle of head 4 sizing.

  • @howne44 Dear Howne, I hate to tell you that orig. Paul=a bit TV-distorted. & only direct comparison of relaxation/activity points in bone distances from similar poses (protrusion of cheeks relative to brow or orbital, chin distance relative to temples relative to eyes in same position ... etc. This is forensics. This video does not set that up. I endorse no forum, but clearer set of undistorted comps, see: htp only1rad . proboards com/index . cgi?board =plastic&action =display&thread =1399

  • Also, you are leaving out the fact there was a rumour already in London by 1967 Feb, if the disclaimer in Beatles Book is to be believed, and Emilio Lari has said everyone he knew at the time knew, but got on with their lives in sympathy. These suggestions indicate a possible PID real timeline. Could you argue it another way? Yes, by stretching the evidence from Lari or discrediting his memory. But it's certainly plausible for the case PID too, and anyway, undistorted photos show it. Best wishes

  • @howne44 Hi. Yr Lennon comments assume wrongly photo evidence considered in careful logic manner (timelines, anomalous expressions they DON'T share, undistorted images compared2 others in photos -- major exception being rounded & baby-look on P on inner Sgt Peppers, which attempts to belie the other longer faces he has in undistorted same-time images). And I think instead that Lennon was relieved at being able finally to make some semi-direct references to it by late 69/70 = another explanation!

  • @howne44 Well, it's not a live footage of a news event, no. But art can contain bits of news (such as the death's head) or re-imagined (metaphorical) scenes: if you died and I made a movie with car crash simulations (end of Blue Jay Way), dead bodies, children with skull makeup, and so on ... the whole movie wouldn't be all about your death but aspects would be. That is also truth. It's called fictional truth: storytelling, not UNTRUTH. Get it? Best wishes.

  • Pre 1667? lol not that long?

  • @howne44 On its own it wouldn't unless we could prove it's Mc's head for sure. But yes, I'm serious.

  • How many of you sad fuckers exist? There's more Dead McCartney theorists on Youtube that there is Christians left in the U.K. Is it true you lot of dipshits actually hold down jobs and do things like fucking vote at elections? No wonder this country is fucked up beyond repair what with Macca dead but fucking Elvis and Michael Jackson are alive. Can you world beating fucking morons not agree to meet in the middle somewhere for fuck sake?

  • @daviegarden Elvis is dead and so is M Jackson. And both had different reports by doctors or autopsy than main line story suggests. Also: Elvis' dad said he thought Elvis was murdered, he thought by "The Colonel", who may have had motive and was a criminal. NEway, E's dad: after then towing the line a while, said he wouldn't say more false info/lies. MJ's death was complicated. Doctor being blamed -- MJ family said murder again too -- but doc may have been fall guy. or lower participant.

  • Paul McCartney is not dead this ridiculous rumour should have gone years ago its a stupid joke

  • wait do u think paul is dead or george? well paul is alive. and ringo is alive. george is dead-lung cancer. john is dead-shot sevral times.

  • @beatlesgirl104 The claim is that Paul died late 66. That 2nd Paul (different bone structure, early photos clearly different guy except one stretched image in Sgt P inside cover) is a willing 5th Beatle, Epstein & Beatles in grief & confused but decided to keep it under wraps, but as time went on they exorcised grief in symbolic form. George dead of cancer, but attacked in massively private surveillance mansion -- said it wasn't any intruder of an ordinary sort. John shot by CIA/FBI connection.

  • George spilled the beans in his last testament. Paul is long dead and Faul

    is still alive. He will be cremated at his death so that no one will ever know the truth. No one will believe the truth.....lol

  • HE SAID COLD NOT PAUL HOMO

  • Think about it. The crash was said to have been bad enough for in which his female passenger died. If she died then there is a high chance he did too.

  • @XpineappleXblossomX I love this subject and the Beatles. I do believe something stranger than fiction, occured w/in the Beatles. All the signs and references to the occult. But, they are/were human! John & Yoko, even had Charlie Swan (famous psychic), on their payroll and in an apt. owned. A lot of death and heart break, occurred in the group. So sad about Stu Sutcliffe and Brian Epstein...not to mention John and Paul's mums dying, so young. Keep watching & wondering!! <3 the Beatles

  • OMG!! So i was watching your other videos and where are you from I like you accent lol lol

  • Comment removed

  • George said, "I lifetime is too short... a new one CAN'T be bought..." So will you please get it right.

  • @JayMaySayHey a new one CAN be bought... just listen... or even read the lyrics

  • @420forsberg 1:16 "A lifetime is so short. A new one can't be bought." Can't. In Scouse (Liverpool accent) can and can't sound very close. It's CAN'T, okay.... It reflects his mystic eastern thought that's spiritual, not physical.

  • I am as sceptical as I can be, but why is it always Paul in all the clues? This myth is not busted yet..

  • @DislektieseBlinde That is so true !! Nobody knows if he's really dead or not,also i'm pretty sure that Paul is alive because ha hasn't even changed that much and plus you can't really find someone that lookas exactly like you we're all unique !! Just saying...

  • Don't forget Jane Asher. Paul started to date her in 1963 and they broke up in 1968 before Paul meets Linda.. Why would have Jane waited 2 years to break up with a double of him? Not even sure if she was the one who broke up. This is absurb.. Paul is not dead.

  • @ThePurpleSheep It was scary, even if the plan did just only maKE THE BAND POPULAR ONCE MORE and that's exactly what it did. We were buying Beatle albums again. Millions of us. I did think at one time that he was gone. Then figured out that no one would put that many plain as many clues in songs and covers if they did.nt want you to know. Then deny it? Done meticously I might add

  • Comment removed

  • The "While My Guitar gently Weeps" is a new clue that I've never seen before plus the references in "When we was fab". The others are old news to me. Be sure to listen to "Blue Jay Way" and it's backing vocals part. That song was "new" to me also. later Applescruffs!

  • @TommyYYZ,

    I am reading a Lennon biography.  It's filled w/death. Especially surrounding car accidents. First, of course being John's mother being hit and killed by a car driven by an off-duty policeman. And Stu Sutcliffe, an original member of the Beatles, dying from brain hemorrhaging due to a blow to the head. John blaming himself for his death @ least self-pitying...IDK, it's tough. I've seen evidence from some ppl on here, that they are @ least involved w/something "covert". ???

  • I've been reading up on John Lennon's life. It appears that death was a center-piece in all the members of the Beatles, life. John's mother, (car death), Paul's mother, Stu Sutcliffe, and all the early Rock n Rollers that inspired "Teddy Boy" John, before he became what he was. It could be just the assoc. w/death, in their lives. Of course, I've seen posts w/George, blatantly calling Paul, Faul....

  • id he died in 1966 why would clues from 1965 even matter?

  • @beatlesfan465 Exactly, they say that they kept paul a secret to stop beatles fans being too upset then killed john when he was going to announce it... Yeah because they'd be distraught over paul but not give a shit about john.. john who?

  • dude, your an idiot. JUST SAYING.

  • @MikeJustesenFilms

    Thank you. The lyrics to Beatles songs and images on album covers that portray include death are coincidentally, eerie. But, like I said, you can get an idea in your head and run w/it. Back Masking(putting msgs on records when played bkwrds) or whatever they call it, some think was a ploy to sell more records b/c they (records) would be ruined after playing them bkwrds. So, re-releasing was a big money maker. Idk, I think everyone has an obsession w/death, even rock stars.

  • Paul McCartney is presently alive and he didn't die in a car crash back in 1966. The Beatles made their jokes and clues to go along with this hoax. A double can't take

    the place of a musical genius. Who wrote the songs after they broke up for Paul?

    Paul wrote his songs because it is really him. End of story.

  • @jpsmart59 If that's true, why did none of the Beatles ever admit to the hoax?? It would've killed the rumor mill. As for the songs, the theory goes that John had a back-log of songs (50 or more) he'd already written with Paul before November 1966. Also, this would explain why Paul's musical genius died with the Beatles. Unless you like the Frog Chorus?

  • The thing w/the whole conspiracies about Paul being dead (like Jim Morrison faking his death), is the people they left behind. Do you really believe, Linda McCartney would have married "Billy Campbell" (faux paul) ? Just like Pamela Courson, Jim Morrison's girlfriend, would have just went back to America and die of a Heroin o.d., 2 or 3 yrs later? The thing is, SO many ppl would have had to be in on the hoax.

    If you play records backwards, you hear what u want 2 hear. That's human nature.

  • @MsReffinej 100% agree. Good post.

  • @MsReffinej No, Paul in 65 was with a different woman, that is what that song is susposed to be about, Good bye. I believe he died in 66, and I will tell you why, the ONLY way the lyrics make sense for so many of the songs is if Paul died in 66 in the way he was susposed to. I am not going to fight city hall about this, there really is no way to prove it. I think the only way the lyrics can match the mastery of the music is for them to be true, not nonsense, as even they have claimed.

  • @MsReffinej That's so true I don't think Linda would marry a fake Paul McCartney !! I mean i'm not calling anyone stupid but if you really think about it he isn't dead.I feel like people force themselves into hearing what they want to hear so they could be right about it you know what I mean?

  • @MsReffinej Not all clues are silly. Original Sgt P image had FRONTAL OPD, not obscured D -- so they modified the OPP patch for SURE in original image. Etc. So: do more research on the timing of Morrison's friends' movements for 1st few days. Also: "too many people involved" is a platitude feeling: it's not hard to get a lot of people into something: some know all, some don't want to hurt others, some only know part, & others don't figure it out at first until it's too late. Learn re. JFK kill.

  • @boobah1067

    I'm not saying it's silly ....I was really questioning, the whole ordeal. I saw a vid on here that showed the OPD frontal. Is it far-fetched to say THAT was doctored? I'm just begging the question.

    I can see how a heroin addict, could OD and give it all away. So, that kind of does blow my Pamela Courson/Jim Morrison theory, away. I read the Morrison bio, although it's been awhile. I know only 2 people actually saw his body.

    All I can say is "I don' know". but ur so sure...

  • @MsReffinej Well, I've thought about it and looked. But congrats: u r clear minded in that there was a clear D. That HAD to have been doctored (from OPP, not debatable as a D), the way 2nd Sgt P image is. So they're real symbols of PID in some way. Last holdout then logically becomes that was "joking" or "metaphorical": "P had a real new personhood" but metaphorical death, after drugs. That's not what happened, but it's last ditch (ie, PID=symbol not literal) before seeing the new Paul for real.

  • @MsReffinej I'm thorough & patient & careful. In 2007 Sam Bernett mentioned the moving of JM's body. He still sticks to innocent heroin OD cover story, but points to the cover up (as if by dealers): Daily Mail UK article 466947. Best comparative timeline testimony re. JM: w3 jfkmontreal com /john_lennon /Chapter13 dot htm (Context, read ALL 17 pp about Laurel Canyon deaths -- not every pg = perfect, but wonderful compilation & some=very solid reasoning -- davesweb dot cnchost com (be patient).

  • @boobah1067 P.S. re PID: seems they showed Paul's dead head (& bodybag). Film full of mourning (& other things), go to Mag Myst Tour where Aunt dreams of "food". Sometimes food=death (we r food4universe) in art/dreams. Paul's full-size dead profile composite w/ Aunt (1 sec). Best MMT on Utube: gx5ar (part 5). Head=surreal acknowledgement of reality of ugly death. Context id=Paul shows in next scene : John=waiter & has "MC"insignia, shovels spagh'ti (brains?), Mr Buster (bust a) Bloodvessel sits.

  • @MsReffinej human nature is to fool other people to gain power over thim

  • @MsReffinej they were married in 69? no?

  • @MsReffinej Incorrect. It is in fact VERY RARE to obtain intelligible words - let alone sentences - with back masking. The only serious question is why the Beatles left so many visual and audio clues. Linda Eastman, a professional photographer, would certainly have been aware of the differences. The theory is that she blackmailed Faul into marriage. Faul's only other option would have been to have arranged for Eastman to be killed by MI5 (Maxwell).

  • You were right: There was some screw ups,like the first song you did is called "You Like Me Too Much", not "I need you". And the biggest mistake you made was saying Paul died in the first place: dude, he is still alive, people just listened to a bunch of Beatles tracks to see what kind of bull **** they can come up with.

  • Forget these stupid clues in the music...All you have to do is see from the pictures of him pre 66 & after. Paul is dead & there is a big difference. I feel like Brody did on Jaw's 2 Don't you see it? It's a shark! But they don't see anything. (sigh)

  • Problem with the Help! theory. 1st wrong song. 2nd wrong year. 1965 is not 1966. 1966 is the year of "death".

  • @JustBeingAnthony I get it. As the annotation says, i fucked up with some text...

  • @MikeJustesenFilms

    here is another clue. on tax-man if you listen to the lyrics before john and paul say "if you get to cold paul", george says "if you drive a car-car". according to the rumor, paul died in his car

  • @JustBeingAnthony he is talking about the reaction of the band as paul is "about to die" so go with his flow

  • nice vid! but i dont think anything before 66 is valid because it happened in 66, and u like me too much and i like u is in early 65 wich is pretty far away from his death. i dont believe he died by the way, im just saying. but nice vid

  • on love you to george sings "a lifetime is so short, a new one CAN'T be bought. not can. listen closer next time.

  • @WeLiveToDanceAlone I know. I fucked up.

  • @MikeJustesenFilms no problem, at least you don't believe in this conspiracy paul is dead bullshit. i respect that, you are forgiven.

  • i call bullshit.

  • In a 1987 interview George says 'you couldn't make an ex-Beatle album without Ringo, could you?" and gives a little eyebrow raise to the camera. John and George were the ones to have Ringo on most of their albums while Paul didn't use Ringo at all... Just sayin'.

  • @subg88 Um, get your facts straight. Paul DID use Ringo on some of his albums.

  • @vnisanianisback

    Really? Which McCartney album did Ringo appear on prior to 1987?

  • @subg88 Tug of War, Pipes of Peace, and Give my Regards to Broad Street

  • @vnisanianisback

    Ok, I stand corrected...still, interesting Paul didn't use Ringo until the 80s. I've always associated Ringo with Lennon and Harrison's solo stuff, but not McCartney's...

  • @FootRockProduction

    expand your mind... and realize what happened... conspiracy.. their is no wrong answer.. your right.. im right.. woho cares.. opinion matters... not just your's.. don't be so close minded...

  • @FootRockProduction lol how true!

  • ok that song from help doesnt make sense paul was supposidly dead in 1966 why would they make a song of something never heard of yet?

  • at 4:04 it says paul "1234567" could it be from the abbey road album "1234567 all good children go to heaven" maybe another clue

  • John was the walrus! well, paul was the disguise, but John was the character. See Lennon song 'GOD' lyrics for an answer. sorry bad english

  • What's the last song name? sorry bad english ;)

  • john lennon, never gaave a serious answer about this, they never did.

    they just use their music to gave a clue.

    confusing yes, but come to think of it from the band to george, clues are still there.

  • bullshit. this one doesn't even make sense

  • also- 6:19 i pooped my pants

  • at 4:55 if you dont know the lyrics- it sounds like he says- paul died. i shit my pants the first time i heard it, but as i hear it more it doesnt say that, but has a jist of it.... a lot.... mind blown

  • wow its 3 am....

  • the walrus shit mi self and a "im a walrus" is not john is paul

  • @FootRockProduction paul's voice and songwriting changed drastically when he allegedly died, that's why it's remained debatable for so long. if you look at a picture of william campbell, whether paul is dead or not, he looks more like ''paul'' in 1967 than paul ever did before. even if he is still alive, the evidence is just so vast that it's clear that most of the clues were put there on purpose, whether it was a joke or a really clever marketing trick, it's there. just open your eyes.

  • Okay listen to this. I just watched the movie called Paul McCartney Really is Dead, The Last Testament Of George Harrison. And in the movie it said John, George, Ringo and Paul's Mom and Dad went to his funeral in '66. But the mistake is Paul's parents were dead before that. Paul's mom dide when Paul was a little kid. So this proves, that the movie is a fake. The real George would know that Paul's parents were dead then, but not all fans.

  • @HardDaysNight44 That movie is disinfo. (To muddy the waters with false overdubs: "Faul" instead of "Paul" interview.) But Paul died. We have 5 great Beatles, but not as the movie suggests: mix facts & untruth. If u want 2see the surreal moment (dream of food, since in death we're food 4 universe), look at MMT: Aunt cries 1st time, Paul's death head flashes, right profile, but in composite, mouth and nose obscured. Next scene John shovels spagh. (brains) in "MC" jacket w/ Mr Buster Bloodvessel.

  • @HardDaysNight44 Paul's father Jim died in 1976. There is no mention of Paul's mother in the film. Jim McCartney remarried Angela Williams in 1964. The film mentions Paul's "parents", which would naturally include his stepmother. Only Paul's father is described reading a eulogy at the funeral.

  • By the way: THE ALBUM COVER THE GUY CARRIES IN FRONT OF THE "3" BEATLES AT THE END IS OF JOHN. If you pause it, you see him, profile with log sideburns, granny glasses. Yes, it's the 4, re-united, one in death (Walrus Paul) and one not present at all (on album cover).

  • @FootRockProduction Trilogy movie #1: vimeo. com/ 16353230 Someone's found Mal Evans' suitcase. Enjoy.

  • @FootRockProduction Trilogy movie #1: vimeo. com/ 16353230

  • The examples of "cold" and so on from pre-end of 1966 are irrelevant. The clues are interrelated and very strong post-1966. But what's really important is the interrelated nature of the proof. See "The Winged Beatle" and take the pre-end of 1966 material out of your vid, to make it stronger. For "The Winged Beatle", go to Trilogy movie #1: vimeo. com/ 16353230

  • Paul had a friend park it there too :P So there you have it, thats the true story. Paul never died. Some people said he did because his face looked different later on, but its a known fact that when your 30 your face starts to narrow, so his facial features would of course look different as he got older. Paul said this himself, and trust me, he never died because if he had the world would defiantly know by now.

  • If you look on Abbey Road, Paul is wearing no shoes, this is an Irish tradition to bury one without his shoes, and Paul loves his Irish heritage. So Paul is supposed to be dead, John is supposed to be an angel (hahhahhaha!!) Ringo is supposed to be the memorial survice guy, and George is the grave digger. Then if you look on the white bugs license plate, it says 28if, as in Paul would have been 28 if he were still alive, but they messed up because he was still 27 at the time :P

  • @Aliceisamazing1234 Blue Jay Way: vocals backward & forward about Paul's being bloody, but also scene has black car & an oncoming car. Hefty evidence not only of PID but also Crowley/Satanism agenda intelligence & avant-garde circles promoting themselves & mere indulgence in name of "freedom". If you want to actually learn the material, the Rotten Apple series = hard (pause-play-pause) as a researcher but many key testaments & images. Better start: Trilogy movie #1: vimeo. com/ 16353230

  • This is how Paul was chosen, George and Ringo were too superstious to play dead, and if it was John, well wouldn't you think it was one of John's jokes? So it had to be Paul. They put clues everywhere, on Revolver, Pauls face is supposed to look like hes lying on the morge, and a "Beatle" is crawling out of his ear like he's dead. Then on Sgt. Pepper, Pauls bass is made into flowers on the cover, and they say Billy Shears, which was supposed to be the replacement.

  • @Aliceisamazing1234 see Trilogy movie #1: vimeo. com/ 16353230

  • He isn't dead, Paul said himself that they did all of this because when he showed Paperback Writer to Brian he said no because the fans wanted love songs, and when they told him that they wanted to right stuff about everyday life, he got worried that records wouldn't sell. So here was the plan. They would say on of The Beatles would die in a car crash, and apparently hide clues in their songs about. This way, fans would buy more albums in order to be able to hear the clues.

  • @Aliceisamazing1234 if that is true why has there been nothing said about the subject through official sources? and why does mccartney always dismiss the subject as nonsence? have you watch the "winged beatle"?

  • @zephiloyd McCartney OF COURSE denies it; but other statements he makes confirm it. If you've seen "The Winged Beatle" and watched it critically, you should know that. There are even more complete clues in the Rotten Apple series, but you have to pause-play-pause and use a lot of careful logic to piece the material together.

  • @boobah1067 You misunderstand. I am replying to someone who thinks he is alive, I think he is dead. I am saying that Faul's outright dismisal of it is evidence that Paul is dead.

  • @zephiloyd Oh. Okay. Well: they've found the 8 mm films by Mal in Kenya, and the suitcase with his manuscript --- and a lot else. Compiled here: vimeo .com /16353230 but leaks are on-going (and some are leaked but not in the movie, or only partly are in there). Enjoy. 1 hour.

  • @boobah1067 yes I have played it about 5 times, there's more good stuff in the private cloud on Iamaphoneys website too

  • To save further embarressment I would take this video off Y.T. 1 is that I need you was made in 65 before the accident on 11-9-66 accident & 2 everyone born after 1970 really don't care because all they have seen throughout their lives is Paul's double. Since he died in the early years of the Beatles, Nobody cares & will go on w/their lives never knowing the truth. (Don't want the truth even if it bit them in the ass) But we older ones who remember Paul pre-66 knows that he is really dead.

  • I can clearly hear PAUL 7 TIMES.

  • man, get a life, talking about clues in harrison songs of 65, even before he "supposed" to have died (1966), get it through you're thick skull, brother: PAUL LIVES!!!!!!

  • what happend to the MC in mccartney haha that part of the vid that says george says the words seven times matching his last name doesnt make sense..i mean its McCartney

  • Personally I think You idiots have nothing better to do with your time than find stupid clues that don't even make sense. Really people find a damn hobby!!!!! Paul McCartney is alive and we all know it! Get a life! You could sure use one!

  • This further more proves the Beatles planned this as a hoax. He supposedly died in 1967, yet Help! is from 1965. Good vid tho.

  • @toasteroven427 anything pre nov 1966 is not clue a, just a coincidence

  • @zephiloyd it can be that, or maybe in 1965 paul found out he had some sort of cancer, or brain tumor,knew he was going to die so he did the look alike contest in 1965, but died of the car crash instead of his disease in 1966,

  • @FootRockProduction Get a life,

  • I noticed that a lot of people see George's songs as clues...I wanted to point out that most of his songs are spiritual, of course some one's going to think they're about Paul being "dead". Like the song Within You, Without You. It's simply saying people live and die, but life will still go on "within you, and without you." People need to understand that the world isn't going to stop spinning just for them.

    ...but, still..It scares me how clear those backward messages are....

  • The first song is "You Like Me Too Much", not I Need You.

  • @WingAscendant I know, i made a mistake. I should really remake this older videos, since they suck.

  • @MikeJustesenFilms um actually at 3:56 George say's oh not Paul but it does sound like he is saying Paul

  • @MikeJustesenFilms you havent got around to Re-making these..? Whats the hold up bro. It'd be really cool if you did, no hassleing by others correcting your mistakes you already pointed out.

  • its actually a new one "CAN'T" be bought. Telling people to appreciate the life they have now, because thats all they will ever get.

  • Hey kid, yes Paul is alive, and if you read my info, you'll see that i don't belive in this either, and he is my personal rock idol. So dont very, you should really get a life

  • @MikeJustesenFilms the beatles DID put the clues there, but, i cant say he is dead just because of that

  • @MikeJustesenFilms There is an "infowar" on now about iamaphoney material. There is hefty evidence not only of PID but also Crowley/Satanism agenda intelligence & avant-garde circles promoting themselves & mere indulgence in the name of "freedom". If you want to actually learn the material, the Rotten Apple series is hard to make through (pause-play-pause) as a researcher but many key testaments & images do get shown. Better to start here w/ Trilogy movie #1: vimeo. com/ 16353230

  • @MikeJustesenFilms yup. what he said

  • I'm not sure about the clues in "Within you and without you", but whatever. The one in "Something" reveresed is remarkably clear though, isn't it? I look forwards to seeing your analysis on that. ^^

  • At the end the damn walrus make me scary !!

    I dont know why !!!

  • Same.. When i saw the musicvideo, i was scared when the Walrus suddently appeared. It was so random and i was'nt prepared for it.

  • YEAH

    Withch song is it?

  • I like those theories, but i don´t think for a second that it might could be true.

    you may find someone that looks like Paul, that plays lefthanded bass, that sounds and sings like him and be creative and write songs like him.

    BUT you'll never find that in one person again.

    (and still i quite enjoy those videos)

  • @BiggWormdpg That's precisely the problem i have with it.

    How can the same person who wrote Eleanor Rigby actually stoop as low as

    "hope of deliverance", "spies like us" or "mary had a little lamb"

    Paul went from charismatic and affable to being voted, repeatedly, the world's most annoying celebrity.

  • @hooragood I know what you mean.

    I think this video sums it up:

    youtube.com/watch?v=_y5n1iuH2H­4

  • xboxlive12234 it might be a combination of sad and funny but the only beatle we can rely on is ringo at this time hes the only person who can tell us the secret about paul's death and i dont recall you saying that ringo told you that secret so your wrong

  • This is a combination of sad and funny

  • I laughed at this, no offense but its nonsense

  • pre 1667?

  • I usually let some friends watch my video first, to see if there are any fuck ups, and this one, neither of us noticed. Im sorry, it should have said, 1967 ;)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more