Added: 3 years ago
From: LuvJetFuel
Views: 30,659
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why is there an apostrophe in the video title? *eyeroll*

  • F3 is a fighter gr4 is a bomber

  • What's the difference between the F3 and GR4 ?

  • F-22 Raptor owns this

  • @monez14 no shit, this is an aircraft from 40 years ago

  • @monez14 And typhoon owns f-22. Oh wait no, f-22 owns nothing, its grounded indefinitely!

  • @MrStig691 sorry but the raptors are back in the skies ;)

  • @MrStig691

    Lol try again, F22s are back in the air!

  • @monez14 And EF-Typhoon owns F22 Raptor... But anyway: Are F-22 Pilots trained in supersonic cruise in 90ft height like Tornado piolts are? Otherwise it would be pretty hard to catch them up

  • Sadly, no more airshows at Biggin Hill as the owners have withdrawn the licence form Air Displays International who organised the shows......... Bummer!!

  • Its not uselless its a strategical bomber not an air to air fighter

  • @NJN2k708 No it's a tactical bomber and yes, it is very useless.

  • Tornadoes: possibly the most useless fighter aircraft in history. Oh no wait, they've just built the Eurofighter...

  • @matthew220891 just built? lol

  • @EurofighterVsRaptor OK fair point, still the Eurofighter's even more useless lol

  • @matthew220891 are you retarded?

  • @cjhklio Explain to me how the fuck this aircraft managed to stay in use when we had a far more deployable ground attack aircraft in the Harrier. The Tornado is useless, then they though, oh I know let's turn it into an interceptor, it doesn't have the necessary fuel consumption at high altitude but that doesn't matter... Just means it can't shoot anything down is all...

  • @matthew220891 i agree the harrier was very good but how can the eurofighter be useless? it is a multi role.

  • @cjhklio A) It costs too much. B) It can only use land bases so will almost always if not always require friendly nations to let us use their bases/airspace. C) Look at the link I'll message you... Hardly multi-role without training... D) The air defence of the UK requires at most 50 of them, no more, and that includes overseas territories. It's useless.

  • @matthew220891 you win. i totally agree with you now. why they scrapped the harrier i dont know. what fast jets have we got now to use for carriers?

  • @cjhklio Cheers mate!

  • @matthew220891 We need more than 50. However the aircraft are amongst the best in the world for their given roles. 136 Tornado GR4 and 232 Typhoon is agreeable given we are on the security council, forever. The flight of 4 Typhoons on the Falklands, for instance, could not be bested by an aircraft in any latin american nation's arsenal, perhaps not even all of them at once. You have to admit, good deterrence

  • lol.. i would love to see that

  • @LuvJetFuel

    well isnt that what this video is for???

  • high speed???? i can run faster

  • @xF22Raptorx LOL - in your dreams! (wet ones!)

  • @xF22Raptorx You must be black ;D

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more