I did a PowerPoint presentation on Why They (Terrorists) Hate Us that caused some jaws to drop in my class (it's not because of "radical Islam," which is what I used to think). Check it out here and pass it on:
I don't want them in America. I don't want them in american prisons, or the streets. I want them in Gitmo on death row, to die for all the innocent people they murdered.
It never surprises me how radical you liberals are. You say it's wrong to kill criminals that have murdererd people yet when a little baby is murdered in the womb you have no problem with it.
AHEM. First off the death penalty is never an easy issue to work with. Abortions are a different matter since fetuses AREN'T EVEN ALIVE YET at the time. the heart doesn't begin to beat until after the fetus developes further. As a fetus it not considered a living thing as of that point in time.
I live in an apartment building where Nazi POWs lived during World War II. They were given jobs and places to live, and were paid for their work. You're upset because we want to put terrorists in jail? Please ...
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."
...it doesn't say anything about 'american rights'.
Ha Ha Ha. The Rethugs can't help but wet themselves that they are out of power. Hence, they create nonsensical demons.
Can you just see one of those Gitmo guys escaping prison? They probably can't speak any English, but the rethugs think they will immediately end up with WMDs; the same WMDs that were never found in Iraq. "Oh, there they are!!!"
Yes if they manage to escape somehow. Or, if any of the other prisoners that they might've recruited get released back into the society, they could do damage to our public. Bringing them to our prisons could make terrorist acts common thing occurrence here.
"Oh my god! WE HAVE TERRORISTS IN OUR PRISON!" lol Newt Gingrich is such an idiot. and to think from 1995 to 1999 if something had happened to both Clinton and Gore it would have been President Gingrich. Uhhh. Now that would have been scary.
I love Harry Reid fainting. He's such a light weight. He's afraid to take on the Congressional Republicans' BS and he can't even keep his Democratic flank in check. Speaking as a loyal Democrat, I wouldn't mind in the slightest if he lost re-election next year. I think the caucus should elect a new Majority leader now.
We call them suspects, but we act like they have been convicted. Cheney was ready willing and able to do it and now is willing to do it again. It is called Modus Operandi folks. Blow up a building pretend someone else did it, mobilize the wealth and armed forces and go steal the oil from the Mid East. Sad but true. i now that if you don't have evidence you have to let them go. Cheney probably got ample nukes and cruise missiles to deliver them. Guess what's next! New empire building.
too many liberals got too much time to make too much stupid shit like this, most likely because they don't have jobs 'n are collecting checks from the government. but hey, who's to say that if i was sucking the tit of the taxpayers i would be any different.
Then don't watch "stupid shit like this." Go back to your Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and Faux News. They're always happy to reinforce your delusion of reality.
They are so easily terrified. Americans need to have a still upper lip and be courageous. "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself," in the words of FDR. Man up and if necessary do your part for your country other than being a scardy cat.
World News Tonight : The Mexican Boarder has been WIDE OPEN for the LAST 9 Yrs ! They caught Boarder patrol agents NOT EVEN LOOKING ...for 9 yrsand some looking the other way ...
The DoD paid impoverished Iraqis and Afghans to provide names of "suspected terrorists" in exchange for cash money. Those are the people rotting in GITMO: personal or religious enemies of poor semites.
No offense but are you f***ing blind!? YouTube is just filled with Anti-Semites of all sorts. And guess what? Most of them are horribly enough American! So before you have a high and mighty speal about only some Islamic extreemists being Anti-Semitist, look around you. I personally see the word Kike thrown around at least 4 times a month!
Citizens or non-citizens, THEY ARE ALL HUMAN. They all have HUMAN RIGHTS. What does a person's country matter anyway? It's not like people can chose (at least, the vast majority of us can't), so it's on the same level as rascism or sexist to discriminate against someone for their nationality.
Yeesha, it's a convenient flaw some people have in forgetting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But you are absolutely correct. ALL humans have rights and if we think ours are so great, we'd be extending them to other people. Our Founders said if we weren't willing to do so, we wouldn't deserve ours either.
GottOngeloof - They have the right to be treated well while in our custody. We do not have the obligation to keep them in our custody. We continue to show our humanity by not handing them back to their home countries (who would kill them).
Go watch The Nick Berg Beheading and then come back here and tell me again about how "human" they are. Your idealism is suicidal. "You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls." - A Few Good Men
prairiefire52 - Raised Intellectually Militant Atheist (product of public secular school) turned Christian once I became an independent adult. "No Zealot Like a Convert" they say. A fan of Mormons and Catholics for their fervor, but still leaning to walk as a Christian for life.
lrn2wlk4life, where in the hell did you come up with my idealism? "They" are human even when "they" act like barbarians. You ever hear of ignorance and want? Read a Christmas Carol. "Son, you can't handle the truth." ~A Few Good Men
Next time try thinking instead of putting words in people's mouths or thinking movies are a reflection of reality. And here's a good clip for you to watch: RE : Wafa Sultan-Terrorism and Islam (New) Part 2 of 3 the video is here on You Tube, post in search bar.
Got your idealism here: "if we think ours are so great, we'd be extending them to other people". The reason our Rights work is because we share common tolerance of diversity. Wafa Sultan makes the same point when she criticises the way Islam oppresses and calls to arms. Provide Radical Islam access to our belly and we will not see brotherhood, we will be shanked again. CAIR is using our courts against us and idealism is why "There is no England now" only Londonistan.
"CAIR is using our courts against us and idealism is why "There is no England now" only Londonistan."
No, it's exchanging idealism for tolerance that's destroying London. And it's not like 'let's not torture people' is the same as 'let's look the other way when Muslim immigrants commit honor killings or require non-Muslim women to wear a hijab'.
Hmmm...thought you were walking with your god. Remember this little verse, "Do unto other as you would have them do unto you"? You might want to look up Christian extremism. You seem to need a little understanding of what you are.
Thanks for the chat. Good luck forcing the military to become police and collect evidence on the battle field for use in pervasive court cases. Also good luck to the terrorists who will be killed by fellow inmates if you put them in our prisons. "Do unto others" is right, but the Christian is not obligated to fall on his sword for your man's secular law.
Thanks for the bullshit. I could give a rats ass what happens to the terrorists by other prisoners in our prison system, but I do care that our court system follows the laws and I do care if American's think our laws are only good enough for us. If our laws are not good enough to try terrorists, then they aren't that good afterall are they? Give it up with the secularist crap. You prefer the alternative, sectarianism? Move to the Middle East.
Nice way to blur the lines between citizen terrorists and terrorists captured on the battle fields in foreign countries. The former have rights and are our probelm and we need to deal with them. The latter have no Constitutional right and need not be in o ur system. Why the Democratic push to equate citizens and non citizens? Are the no priviledges to being a citizen anymore? Also, why only show Republicans freaking out. The House vote against bringing them here was 90% Semocrats
"...terrorists [from] foreign countries...have no Constitutional right and need not be in o ur system. Why the Democratic push to equate citizens and non citizens? Are the no priviledges to being a citizen anymore?"
lrn, people like you are why other people hate us Americans.
Yeah, only we should be allowed access to our prisons! This is about citizen's rights, not about the need to house dangerous criminals. The Constitution doesn't guarantee them rights, therefore they have none.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hooya2 - No amount of appeasement will make those who hate us come to like us. Those who hate us will continue to hate us until they get off their Plantation of Victimhood. Plus, you've really got your focus on the wrong folks. There are tons of folks who love us and want to come to our country. They don't hate us. 80-20 rule man. You'll spent 80% energy to get that last 20% or 20% energy to get the first 80% of good folks.
"No amount of appeasement will make those who hate us come to like us."
Are you mentally ill? The vast majority of people who hate us do so because they feel that we're abusing our power; if we stopped, and started respecting human rights, and stopped assassinating people and toppling stable governments for oil interests, and stopped TORTURING people, the world's opinion of us would skyrocket.
"80-20 rule man."
You think 80% of the world has a favorable opinion of America!? ROFLMAO
That is why we call Hooya2's folks the "Blame America First" crowd. Yes, I believe that 80% of the world wants to come to the US. We're not perfect, but we're the best the world has. Name a government you like better than the US.
"Yes, I believe that 80% of the world wants to come to the US."
You really are a bullshit master, aren't you? We're talking about whether people LIKE Americans, not whether they want to live in America.
The Pew Global Attitudes Survey shows foreign approval of the US has nosedived since 2000. For example; Britain was at 80%, and is now around 60, and Britian is at the top. Most of the industrialized world has fallen to below 50%.
"That is why we call Hooya2's folks the "Blame America First" crowd."
This is why we call lrn2wlk's crowd the "Fucking morons" crowd. We had tremendous national support after 9/11--until our president invaded a country that had nothing to do with the attacks, based on faulty intelligence. How can you not call a mistake like that America's fault?
"Glad you came back to being reasonable."
Came back? I never espoused the position you were arguing against, you nitwit.
"Came back? I never espoused the position you were arguing against, you nitwit."
I feel like if I don't clarify this, you're going to try to twist my words, so:
I never espoused the position that welfare should be available to everyone, simply that humane treatment --i.e. no torture, no long-term imprisonment without trial, etc.--is illegal and should not be done, and there is no rational reason to keep from imprisoning foreign terrorists in our prisons.
Hooya2 - I understand it feels better to imprison terrorists in our prisons, but we lack jurisdiction. This would be like the US military going in to Canada and bringing someone who committed murder in Canada in to the US. We don't have the right to use our laws to prosecute foreigners. Obama wants them tried in our courts so that they can be freed. The military tribunals are the only international court with the right to pass judgment. Guantanamo is not Abu Ghraib.
"...we lack jurisdiction...The military tribunals are the only international court with the right to pass judgment."
What the fuck? It's like you said the exact opposite of reality.
We have jurisdiction to try POWs under the 3rd Geneva Convention, military tribunals aren't international, they're made up of members from a military (ours, in this case) and they're the only court we CAN'T use because they're not regularly constituted and so violate the terms in GCIII (viz Hamdan v. Rumsfeld).
They aren't POWs because they hide among civilians.
ICRC, Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977. Art. 44 paragraph 3. "combatants are obliged to distinguish themselves from the civilian population while they are engaged in an attack"
"Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities."
"They aren't POWs because they hide among civilians....Art. 44 paragraph 3."
*facepalm*
Maybe you should have read the very next paragraph:
A combatant who falls into the power of an adverse Party while failing to meet the requirements set forth in the second sentence of paragraph 3 shall forfeit his right to be a prisoner of war, but he shall, nevertheless, be given protections equivalent in all respects to those accorded to prisoners of war by the Third Convention and by this Protocol.
NYT, SHERYL STOLBERG 5/20/09 - "President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a preventive detention system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said."
Obama thinks some folk can't be tried, and he won't even wait for them to commit a crime.
"given protections equivalent in all respects to those accorded to prisoners of war" which they have been given. Even the red cross says all Geneva Convention rules are being followed at Gitmo. The next sentence says "This protection includes [POW parity] where such a person is tried and punished for any offenses he has committed". We're doing that, in a military tribunal with ACLU lawyers at their side. Why froth the domestic prison folks unless you're looking for trouble?
"Even the red cross says all Geneva Convention rules are being followed at Gitmo."
I'm starting to think you're lying on purpose.
The ICRC's 2007 report stated clearly and emphatically that Gitmo directly violated the Geneva Conventions, through undeclared detention and torture. The report is formatted to not allow copy/pasting, but you can read it for yourself by Googling "CIA Custody International Committee of the Red Cross". It's the first hit.
""This protection includes [POW parity] where such a person is tried...We're doing that, in a military tribunal with ACLU lawyers..."
No, we're not; one POW right is to be tried by a regularly constituted court, which military tribunals ARE NOT. That's why the SC ruled that military tribunals could not be used.
ACLU lawyers are good, but military officials as judges and jury, and a 2/3rd vote to convict, and lower standards of evidence, all make military tribunals irregular courts.
Yea but they are only truely terrorists if they peronally attack a civilian target or threaten civilians. Everytime we incorrectly call a suicide bomber (howerver horrible) a terrorist, we make light of the term.
obamawalker - I agree. "terrorist" is over used. Most islamic suicide bombers don't want to use terror (fear) as a weapon. They simply want to kill non-believers.
You are ignorant! I've read your replies to people. You are evangelizing your sick position to everyone and putting words in their mouths. Your fervor is great! You have joined the walk with the zealots. Your "militant" atheist background didn't disappear when you found god. Try searching deeper, this time look inside yourself.
You may disagree with me, but this is not the same as me being ignorant.
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!
-Barry Goldwater
I remember when Liberals used to be liberal. It is a shame the Progressives embrace Tyranny .
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
No, you are ignorant because you espouse a limited understanding of the topics you raise and you put words in other people's mouths to open further discourse in other things you lack an understanding of. You also assume people are Liberals if they challenge you. I'm an Independent.
Here's a quote for you, "I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent."
Good quote. Jefferson was such an Individualist that he wouldn't even sign the Constitution because "I will tell you now what I do not like. [There is no] bill of rights, providing... what the people are entitled to against every government on earth." You may see religion as oppression, but I believe Jefferson is best understood and was most prescient in opposition of Progressive Tyranny like FDR's "Second Bill of Rights". "God Save Us From Ourselves"
Progressive Tyranny? what about Conservative Tyranny? You know, the standing in the way of progress? And talk about living in a bubble....No one is more in an echo chamber right now than the extreme Right! They're letting their non-elected talking heads speak for them, i.e. Limbaugh, Cheney and Gingrich, and its not helping them with the middle at all... Oh and by the way, I would assert that Jefferson saw organized religion as oppression, that's why he was diest and not a Christian...
Where is this "progress" going? If talking science, please acknowledge volumes of junk science hijacked to push socialism. It is disingenuous to say we had less Liberty in the past, so clearly the force that pushes forward is more tyrannical. Need I name the freedom's I've lost? Land use, ownership of the product of my work and life energy, more police presence with integrated govt forced diversity, etcetc. Christ. Right have lost school prayer, they have no power compared to hedonistic mob.
You really ought to take a history course. As for my supposed belief in the oppression of religion, on the contrary, I believe most religious people are not zealots. But the few noisy rabble rousers like you make some think all religious people are intolerant fundamentalists like you. Truth is, most people don't sit in judgment of other people and actually embrace diversity. Loud and obnoxious neither makes you a majority, nor right.
Putting words in people's mouths is an effective way to draw out their true beliefs. They are forced to confirm or deny. It is silly to take anything on the web too personally. This headzup channel is hopelessly Left and so are a majority of the viewers. An argument between the Right and the Middle is a fine way to show the Left there is life outside their bubble. Having limited understanding of legal details is not a reason to be silent.
Actually everyone has rights under the US constitution. Have you read it? The bill of rights says nothing about "citizens" having these rights. They are prohibitions on government actions, regardless of the citizenship status of the person.
factusnonverbus - I hear ya man, but this idealism will make us broke in no time. Just think if we all lived in your "no borders" world and all of Africa was eligible for welfare benefits. There are people on this globe who contribute to the betterment of everyone and there are folks who, like a drowning person, will push ya down if you're dumb enough to trade your life for theirs. There are differences between citizens and non-citizens. Your point is there shouldn't be. That'll kill us man.
"Just think if we all lived in your "no borders" world and all of Africa was eligible for welfare benefits."
Again, I have to wonder if you're insane. Welfare is never promised in the constitution, and no one is proposing that Americans supply welfare to the world. We're proposing that we house criminals that we captured in real prisons, rather than special facilities. We're also proposing that we should grant human rights to everyone--as in, we won't hold anyone without trial.
Hooya2 - Glad you came back to being reasonable. I happen to think it is a bad idea to put them in our prisons, but at least you aren't one of the "no borders" crazies in the Democrat party.
For having been born in the western hemisphere? I don't think so, and ffs American means everything from the southern tip of Argentina to the northwestern tip of Alaska and northeastern tip of Greenland. So please, people north, east, south and west on this planet, we are OF America, we do not constitute it. This would be like thinking when you say European you mean only England.
It was an FBI sting. The four were not arabic so that's out of the way. They had purchased 37 pounds of thankfully inert C4 bought from a FBI agent posing as an arms dealer. Not to mention the surface to air missiles which were duds as well from the same guy. They were planing to blow up two Jewish temples in NY and shoot down aircraft with the missiles. They moved on them when they were watched putting the explosives in cars and leaving them in front of the targets.
Thanks for the info. That's refreshing if true and I sure hope it is true but until we get an independant investigation of 9/11, Oklahoma City or any of these other false flag operations it's hard to know which bullshit to believe.
Just as I suspected ... the FBI created the group and tried to give them weapons. They do this to get anti-terror funding and to legitimize the MIAC Report and DHS Report demonizing patriots in this country.
They had been watching them for a year. All three were white I belive and were anti-Semites. Getting the C4 apparently wasn't enough for them. Actually pulling off SAM launchers? Too good to be true apparently. Tried to give them weapons? All of the stuff they gave was deactivated and inert. They set them up plain and simple. It kinda like when you hire a hitman to kill someone and he turns out to be an undercover cop. You got to bait them to get convictions or else they could walk.
Nice shootin' Michelle! AK47 sound effect spot on BTW! I think she's aiming at the evil "Federal" Reserve banksters. I hope she takes out a few Rothschild zillionaires but unfortunately they're usually hidden from view doing their dastardly Zionist puppeteering behind the scenes.
This has been flagged as spam show
I did a PowerPoint presentation on Why They (Terrorists) Hate Us that caused some jaws to drop in my class (it's not because of "radical Islam," which is what I used to think). Check it out here and pass it on:
slideshare(dot)net/anarcholibertarian/why-do-they-hate-us
[ YouTube wont allow links to be posted to keep spam down, so just replace (dot) with a . ]
ErikLiberty 1 year ago
Keep your Pampers on. We already had Timothy McVeigh, Charles Manson, Sirhan Sirhan, and Jeffrey Dahmer. We can handle Middle Eastern terrorists.
keyboardplaya 2 years ago
@keyboardplaya
You forgot to mention L. Ron Hubbard.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
I don't want them in America. I don't want them in american prisons, or the streets. I want them in Gitmo on death row, to die for all the innocent people they murdered.
It never surprises me how radical you liberals are. You say it's wrong to kill criminals that have murdererd people yet when a little baby is murdered in the womb you have no problem with it.
God help you because you need it.
MemoryofTwilight789 2 years ago
@MemoryofTwilight789
AHEM. First off the death penalty is never an easy issue to work with. Abortions are a different matter since fetuses AREN'T EVEN ALIVE YET at the time. the heart doesn't begin to beat until after the fetus developes further. As a fetus it not considered a living thing as of that point in time.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
I guess terrorists in prison is worse than them being out on the streets killing people.
DeagleBeagle 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obama is stupid, he actually wants to bring terrorist to our country?
THEY ARE NOT AMERICANS SO TERRORIST DON'T GET AMERICAN RIGHTS.
MemoryofTwilight789 2 years ago
I live in an apartment building where Nazi POWs lived during World War II. They were given jobs and places to live, and were paid for their work. You're upset because we want to put terrorists in jail? Please ...
glennbecker 2 years ago
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."
...it doesn't say anything about 'american rights'.
dickravis 2 years ago
@MemoryofTwilight789
Ever hear of Timothy McVeigh? Apparenty not.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
Ha Ha Ha. The Rethugs can't help but wet themselves that they are out of power. Hence, they create nonsensical demons.
Can you just see one of those Gitmo guys escaping prison? They probably can't speak any English, but the rethugs think they will immediately end up with WMDs; the same WMDs that were never found in Iraq. "Oh, there they are!!!"
Phlipper12 2 years ago
That's exactly how Republicans react. But where were draft dodger Dick Cheney and AWOL George W. Bush?
redbirdwell 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
Poontangible 2 years ago
Cheney and Dubya were in Texas blowing each other at the time.
Poontangible 2 years ago
Should have had Joe Lieberman in there with him covering his eyes saying "No! It's too horrible to watch!"
bart11114 2 years ago
David Vitter, the Republican sh###er, was a nice touch to this video.
I can hardly wait for the Senator John Ensign (R-Nevada) video to come out. He likes to nail the wives of his staff members.
redbirdwell 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This might be the gayest PC self-loathing crap on You-Tube.
IBERJEN 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Holy Fuck is this stupid!
jeh6421 2 years ago
Oh noes! Terrorists jailed in the United States!!!! Oh lawdy lawd!
Apparently Cuba's the only country on the planet with a pair of testicles.
Sugadaddy774 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yawn.
Liberals = bigger government = dependency = conformists = dumbed down masses
Isn't it funny to watch?
theconstitution2 2 years ago
uh no
You are a retard
todoke 2 years ago
Limbaugh nomnomnomnom
todoke 2 years ago 3
Perfect characterizations :)
MissAnthropic66 2 years ago
Lame video trying to be clever.
ferrisphotography 2 years ago
Oh SHIT...if they're in our prisons does that mean they will blow up??
/s
redteamdarkspear 2 years ago
Yes if they manage to escape somehow. Or, if any of the other prisoners that they might've recruited get released back into the society, they could do damage to our public. Bringing them to our prisons could make terrorist acts common thing occurrence here.
myron73 2 years ago
hahaha LOL
kickyourass777 2 years ago
lol
slusheee 2 years ago
haha WTF
noizyme 2 years ago
That sucked!
mastinox 2 years ago
This sucks : (
JMehrman 2 years ago
how could this be in most popular videos? It has only 6000 views and was added May 22.
kinatis 2 years ago
its a conspiracy..viacom.
FoxyAsIs 2 years ago
Ron Paul for president 2012
soldatna 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1.go to another vidio
2 leave this comment
3without letiing go of ur breath than your a good kisser
loch2hot 2 years ago
I laughed so hard at Bachmann taking out her machine gun.
S0vereignty 2 years ago 2
lolrus!
radudeATL 2 years ago
We have terrorist in our prisions oh my oh my oh my!
ivankaman21 2 years ago
"Oh my god! WE HAVE TERRORISTS IN OUR PRISON!" lol Newt Gingrich is such an idiot. and to think from 1995 to 1999 if something had happened to both Clinton and Gore it would have been President Gingrich. Uhhh. Now that would have been scary.
bart11114 2 years ago 7
Oh God oh God oh God oh God oh God.......
Gravy2468 2 years ago 8
haha
jrwilson87 2 years ago
I love Harry Reid fainting. He's such a light weight. He's afraid to take on the Congressional Republicans' BS and he can't even keep his Democratic flank in check. Speaking as a loyal Democrat, I wouldn't mind in the slightest if he lost re-election next year. I think the caucus should elect a new Majority leader now.
GoodbyeToBlueberyPie 2 years ago 3
LMAO!!!
johnny718bravo 2 years ago
Funny.
wblstudios 2 years ago
why dont u all shut the fuck up and go to work
oiyabastard 2 years ago
This is a brilliant video and VERY accurate.
hackerblaster 2 years ago
We call them suspects, but we act like they have been convicted. Cheney was ready willing and able to do it and now is willing to do it again. It is called Modus Operandi folks. Blow up a building pretend someone else did it, mobilize the wealth and armed forces and go steal the oil from the Mid East. Sad but true. i now that if you don't have evidence you have to let them go. Cheney probably got ample nukes and cruise missiles to deliver them. Guess what's next! New empire building.
hypnofan35 2 years ago
too many liberals got too much time to make too much stupid shit like this, most likely because they don't have jobs 'n are collecting checks from the government. but hey, who's to say that if i was sucking the tit of the taxpayers i would be any different.
chriscunanan 2 years ago
chriscunanan lol, mindless minions like you are still living with your mommies
Yankhadenough 2 years ago
Then don't watch "stupid shit like this." Go back to your Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and Faux News. They're always happy to reinforce your delusion of reality.
undiesinabunch 2 years ago 5
headzup: Acorn is a fraud and a mess.
brettfan007 2 years ago
They are so easily terrified. Americans need to have a still upper lip and be courageous. "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself," in the words of FDR. Man up and if necessary do your part for your country other than being a scardy cat.
schultzee4748 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1.-copy and paste
2.-paste it in 2 different videos
3.. hold breath for 10 secs
4.- look at your hand
alancrowley08 2 years ago
lol, there idiots
jetbtkng 2 years ago
jetbtkng - you probably mean "they're", unless you are tarzan. there food. me eat. there Republican. me make fool of self.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
no i meant what i said, there, so idiots like you would post stupid shit like that
jetbtkng 2 years ago
World News Tonight : The Mexican Boarder has been WIDE OPEN for the LAST 9 Yrs ! They caught Boarder patrol agents NOT EVEN LOOKING ...for 9 yrsand some looking the other way ...
nohealthcare62 2 years ago
Haha,
Bunch of fear mongers and lying demagogues.
VexRiot 2 years ago
loooooooool
Reqrezentin 2 years ago
I say let them into the general prison population. They'll all be shanked within a week. Problem solved.
roberteckerson 2 years ago 3
if you pluked out gingrichs eyes you could have eye of newt like on bewitched
gymer15 2 years ago 2
OMG This is so funny! I think that this one is my all time favorite so far... 10 stars.
Smartassawhip 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I MISS BUSH :(
jokerchat 2 years ago
Dumb ass, Bush is not your daddy...
Eball06 2 years ago
You're obviously delirious and high or just extremely stupid.
SaturnEternity 2 years ago
The sixth word of this vid tells it all...
SUSPECTED....
GITMO to is full of suspects....not terrorists.
HEYBUDD 2 years ago 2
The DoD paid impoverished Iraqis and Afghans to provide names of "suspected terrorists" in exchange for cash money. Those are the people rotting in GITMO: personal or religious enemies of poor semites.
undiesinabunch 2 years ago
No offense but are you f***ing blind!? YouTube is just filled with Anti-Semites of all sorts. And guess what? Most of them are horribly enough American! So before you have a high and mighty speal about only some Islamic extreemists being Anti-Semitist, look around you. I personally see the word Kike thrown around at least 4 times a month!
obamawalker 2 years ago 2
That was good! I laughed out-loud with this!
armyveteran101st 2 years ago 2
Oh My God! That was perfect!
obamawalker 2 years ago 2
Terroism is just a motive for violence and murder.
Why should people with this motive not be thrown in jail as everyone else?
qanazir 2 years ago
Citizens or non-citizens, THEY ARE ALL HUMAN. They all have HUMAN RIGHTS. What does a person's country matter anyway? It's not like people can chose (at least, the vast majority of us can't), so it's on the same level as rascism or sexist to discriminate against someone for their nationality.
YeeshaOfMyst 2 years ago
Yeesha, it's a convenient flaw some people have in forgetting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But you are absolutely correct. ALL humans have rights and if we think ours are so great, we'd be extending them to other people. Our Founders said if we weren't willing to do so, we wouldn't deserve ours either.
GottOngeloof 2 years ago
GottOngeloof - They have the right to be treated well while in our custody. We do not have the obligation to keep them in our custody. We continue to show our humanity by not handing them back to their home countries (who would kill them).
Go watch The Nick Berg Beheading and then come back here and tell me again about how "human" they are. Your idealism is suicidal. "You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls." - A Few Good Men
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
In what religion were you brought up, lrn2wlk4life? I'm interested in the source of your values and your courage.
prairiefire52 2 years ago
prairiefire52 - Raised Intellectually Militant Atheist (product of public secular school) turned Christian once I became an independent adult. "No Zealot Like a Convert" they say. A fan of Mormons and Catholics for their fervor, but still leaning to walk as a Christian for life.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
lrn2wlk4life, where in the hell did you come up with my idealism? "They" are human even when "they" act like barbarians. You ever hear of ignorance and want? Read a Christmas Carol. "Son, you can't handle the truth." ~A Few Good Men
Next time try thinking instead of putting words in people's mouths or thinking movies are a reflection of reality. And here's a good clip for you to watch: RE : Wafa Sultan-Terrorism and Islam (New) Part 2 of 3 the video is here on You Tube, post in search bar.
GottOngeloof 2 years ago
Got your idealism here: "if we think ours are so great, we'd be extending them to other people". The reason our Rights work is because we share common tolerance of diversity. Wafa Sultan makes the same point when she criticises the way Islam oppresses and calls to arms. Provide Radical Islam access to our belly and we will not see brotherhood, we will be shanked again. CAIR is using our courts against us and idealism is why "There is no England now" only Londonistan.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"CAIR is using our courts against us and idealism is why "There is no England now" only Londonistan."
No, it's exchanging idealism for tolerance that's destroying London. And it's not like 'let's not torture people' is the same as 'let's look the other way when Muslim immigrants commit honor killings or require non-Muslim women to wear a hijab'.
Hooya2 2 years ago
Hmmm...thought you were walking with your god. Remember this little verse, "Do unto other as you would have them do unto you"? You might want to look up Christian extremism. You seem to need a little understanding of what you are.
GottOngeloof 2 years ago
Thanks for the chat. Good luck forcing the military to become police and collect evidence on the battle field for use in pervasive court cases. Also good luck to the terrorists who will be killed by fellow inmates if you put them in our prisons. "Do unto others" is right, but the Christian is not obligated to fall on his sword for your man's secular law.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
Thanks for the bullshit. I could give a rats ass what happens to the terrorists by other prisoners in our prison system, but I do care that our court system follows the laws and I do care if American's think our laws are only good enough for us. If our laws are not good enough to try terrorists, then they aren't that good afterall are they? Give it up with the secularist crap. You prefer the alternative, sectarianism? Move to the Middle East.
GottOngeloof 2 years ago 3
Nice way to blur the lines between citizen terrorists and terrorists captured on the battle fields in foreign countries. The former have rights and are our probelm and we need to deal with them. The latter have no Constitutional right and need not be in o ur system. Why the Democratic push to equate citizens and non citizens? Are the no priviledges to being a citizen anymore? Also, why only show Republicans freaking out. The House vote against bringing them here was 90% Semocrats
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"...terrorists [from] foreign countries...have no Constitutional right and need not be in o ur system. Why the Democratic push to equate citizens and non citizens? Are the no priviledges to being a citizen anymore?"
lrn, people like you are why other people hate us Americans.
Yeah, only we should be allowed access to our prisons! This is about citizen's rights, not about the need to house dangerous criminals. The Constitution doesn't guarantee them rights, therefore they have none.
Hooya2 2 years ago
Ali al-marri has been being held in Charleston SC since 2003.
Smartassawhip 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hooya2 - No amount of appeasement will make those who hate us come to like us. Those who hate us will continue to hate us until they get off their Plantation of Victimhood. Plus, you've really got your focus on the wrong folks. There are tons of folks who love us and want to come to our country. They don't hate us. 80-20 rule man. You'll spent 80% energy to get that last 20% or 20% energy to get the first 80% of good folks.
The rest of your comment wasn't very articulate.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"No amount of appeasement will make those who hate us come to like us."
Are you mentally ill? The vast majority of people who hate us do so because they feel that we're abusing our power; if we stopped, and started respecting human rights, and stopped assassinating people and toppling stable governments for oil interests, and stopped TORTURING people, the world's opinion of us would skyrocket.
"80-20 rule man."
You think 80% of the world has a favorable opinion of America!? ROFLMAO
Hooya2 2 years ago 5
That is why we call Hooya2's folks the "Blame America First" crowd. Yes, I believe that 80% of the world wants to come to the US. We're not perfect, but we're the best the world has. Name a government you like better than the US.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"Yes, I believe that 80% of the world wants to come to the US."
You really are a bullshit master, aren't you? We're talking about whether people LIKE Americans, not whether they want to live in America.
The Pew Global Attitudes Survey shows foreign approval of the US has nosedived since 2000. For example; Britain was at 80%, and is now around 60, and Britian is at the top. Most of the industrialized world has fallen to below 50%.
Hooya2 2 years ago 3
"That is why we call Hooya2's folks the "Blame America First" crowd."
This is why we call lrn2wlk's crowd the "Fucking morons" crowd. We had tremendous national support after 9/11--until our president invaded a country that had nothing to do with the attacks, based on faulty intelligence. How can you not call a mistake like that America's fault?
"Glad you came back to being reasonable."
Came back? I never espoused the position you were arguing against, you nitwit.
Hooya2 2 years ago 3
"Came back? I never espoused the position you were arguing against, you nitwit."
I feel like if I don't clarify this, you're going to try to twist my words, so:
I never espoused the position that welfare should be available to everyone, simply that humane treatment --i.e. no torture, no long-term imprisonment without trial, etc.--is illegal and should not be done, and there is no rational reason to keep from imprisoning foreign terrorists in our prisons.
Hooya2 2 years ago 3
Hooya2 - I understand it feels better to imprison terrorists in our prisons, but we lack jurisdiction. This would be like the US military going in to Canada and bringing someone who committed murder in Canada in to the US. We don't have the right to use our laws to prosecute foreigners. Obama wants them tried in our courts so that they can be freed. The military tribunals are the only international court with the right to pass judgment. Guantanamo is not Abu Ghraib.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"...we lack jurisdiction...The military tribunals are the only international court with the right to pass judgment."
What the fuck? It's like you said the exact opposite of reality.
We have jurisdiction to try POWs under the 3rd Geneva Convention, military tribunals aren't international, they're made up of members from a military (ours, in this case) and they're the only court we CAN'T use because they're not regularly constituted and so violate the terms in GCIII (viz Hamdan v. Rumsfeld).
Hooya2 2 years ago
They aren't POWs because they hide among civilians.
ICRC, Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977. Art. 44 paragraph 3. "combatants are obliged to distinguish themselves from the civilian population while they are engaged in an attack"
"Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities."
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"They aren't POWs because they hide among civilians....Art. 44 paragraph 3."
*facepalm*
Maybe you should have read the very next paragraph:
A combatant who falls into the power of an adverse Party while failing to meet the requirements set forth in the second sentence of paragraph 3 shall forfeit his right to be a prisoner of war, but he shall, nevertheless, be given protections equivalent in all respects to those accorded to prisoners of war by the Third Convention and by this Protocol.
Hooya2 2 years ago
NYT, SHERYL STOLBERG 5/20/09 - "President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a preventive detention system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said."
Obama thinks some folk can't be tried, and he won't even wait for them to commit a crime.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"given protections equivalent in all respects to those accorded to prisoners of war" which they have been given. Even the red cross says all Geneva Convention rules are being followed at Gitmo. The next sentence says "This protection includes [POW parity] where such a person is tried and punished for any offenses he has committed". We're doing that, in a military tribunal with ACLU lawyers at their side. Why froth the domestic prison folks unless you're looking for trouble?
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"Even the red cross says all Geneva Convention rules are being followed at Gitmo."
I'm starting to think you're lying on purpose.
The ICRC's 2007 report stated clearly and emphatically that Gitmo directly violated the Geneva Conventions, through undeclared detention and torture. The report is formatted to not allow copy/pasting, but you can read it for yourself by Googling "CIA Custody International Committee of the Red Cross". It's the first hit.
Hooya2 2 years ago
Hey, if Patreaus is on board, im ok.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
""This protection includes [POW parity] where such a person is tried...We're doing that, in a military tribunal with ACLU lawyers..."
No, we're not; one POW right is to be tried by a regularly constituted court, which military tribunals ARE NOT. That's why the SC ruled that military tribunals could not be used.
ACLU lawyers are good, but military officials as judges and jury, and a 2/3rd vote to convict, and lower standards of evidence, all make military tribunals irregular courts.
Hooya2 2 years ago
Yea but they are only truely terrorists if they peronally attack a civilian target or threaten civilians. Everytime we incorrectly call a suicide bomber (howerver horrible) a terrorist, we make light of the term.
obamawalker 2 years ago
obamawalker - I agree. "terrorist" is over used. Most islamic suicide bombers don't want to use terror (fear) as a weapon. They simply want to kill non-believers.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
You are ignorant! I've read your replies to people. You are evangelizing your sick position to everyone and putting words in their mouths. Your fervor is great! You have joined the walk with the zealots. Your "militant" atheist background didn't disappear when you found god. Try searching deeper, this time look inside yourself.
GottOngeloof 2 years ago
You may disagree with me, but this is not the same as me being ignorant.
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!
-Barry Goldwater
I remember when Liberals used to be liberal. It is a shame the Progressives embrace Tyranny .
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
No, you are ignorant because you espouse a limited understanding of the topics you raise and you put words in other people's mouths to open further discourse in other things you lack an understanding of. You also assume people are Liberals if they challenge you. I'm an Independent.
GottOngeloof 2 years ago
Here's a quote for you, "I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent."
~Thomas Jefferson
GottOngeloof 2 years ago
Good quote. Jefferson was such an Individualist that he wouldn't even sign the Constitution because "I will tell you now what I do not like. [There is no] bill of rights, providing... what the people are entitled to against every government on earth." You may see religion as oppression, but I believe Jefferson is best understood and was most prescient in opposition of Progressive Tyranny like FDR's "Second Bill of Rights". "God Save Us From Ourselves"
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
Progressive Tyranny? what about Conservative Tyranny? You know, the standing in the way of progress? And talk about living in a bubble....No one is more in an echo chamber right now than the extreme Right! They're letting their non-elected talking heads speak for them, i.e. Limbaugh, Cheney and Gingrich, and its not helping them with the middle at all... Oh and by the way, I would assert that Jefferson saw organized religion as oppression, that's why he was diest and not a Christian...
GoodbyeToBlueberyPie 2 years ago
Where is this "progress" going? If talking science, please acknowledge volumes of junk science hijacked to push socialism. It is disingenuous to say we had less Liberty in the past, so clearly the force that pushes forward is more tyrannical. Need I name the freedom's I've lost? Land use, ownership of the product of my work and life energy, more police presence with integrated govt forced diversity, etcetc. Christ. Right have lost school prayer, they have no power compared to hedonistic mob.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
You really ought to take a history course. As for my supposed belief in the oppression of religion, on the contrary, I believe most religious people are not zealots. But the few noisy rabble rousers like you make some think all religious people are intolerant fundamentalists like you. Truth is, most people don't sit in judgment of other people and actually embrace diversity. Loud and obnoxious neither makes you a majority, nor right.
GottOngeloof 2 years ago 2
Putting words in people's mouths is an effective way to draw out their true beliefs. They are forced to confirm or deny. It is silly to take anything on the web too personally. This headzup channel is hopelessly Left and so are a majority of the viewers. An argument between the Right and the Middle is a fine way to show the Left there is life outside their bubble. Having limited understanding of legal details is not a reason to be silent.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
Actually everyone has rights under the US constitution. Have you read it? The bill of rights says nothing about "citizens" having these rights. They are prohibitions on government actions, regardless of the citizenship status of the person.
factusnonverbus 2 years ago
factusnonverbus - I hear ya man, but this idealism will make us broke in no time. Just think if we all lived in your "no borders" world and all of Africa was eligible for welfare benefits. There are people on this globe who contribute to the betterment of everyone and there are folks who, like a drowning person, will push ya down if you're dumb enough to trade your life for theirs. There are differences between citizens and non-citizens. Your point is there shouldn't be. That'll kill us man.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
"Just think if we all lived in your "no borders" world and all of Africa was eligible for welfare benefits."
Again, I have to wonder if you're insane. Welfare is never promised in the constitution, and no one is proposing that Americans supply welfare to the world. We're proposing that we house criminals that we captured in real prisons, rather than special facilities. We're also proposing that we should grant human rights to everyone--as in, we won't hold anyone without trial.
Hooya2 2 years ago 2
Hooya2 - Glad you came back to being reasonable. I happen to think it is a bad idea to put them in our prisons, but at least you aren't one of the "no borders" crazies in the Democrat party.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
so you're a better Human being for being American... ? So much for moral values
hellboundmatt 2 years ago
For having been born in the western hemisphere? I don't think so, and ffs American means everything from the southern tip of Argentina to the northwestern tip of Alaska and northeastern tip of Greenland. So please, people north, east, south and west on this planet, we are OF America, we do not constitute it. This would be like thinking when you say European you mean only England.
tremedar 2 years ago
hellboundmatt - not better, just more entitled.
lrn2wlk4life 2 years ago
these have gotten funnier in recent times.
rj12124 2 years ago
Have the terror suspects all been released yet or haven't they been found to be on the CIA payroll as is usually the case?
undiesinabunch 2 years ago
It was an FBI sting. The four were not arabic so that's out of the way. They had purchased 37 pounds of thankfully inert C4 bought from a FBI agent posing as an arms dealer. Not to mention the surface to air missiles which were duds as well from the same guy. They were planing to blow up two Jewish temples in NY and shoot down aircraft with the missiles. They moved on them when they were watched putting the explosives in cars and leaving them in front of the targets.
JackJivewriter 2 years ago
Thanks for the info. That's refreshing if true and I sure hope it is true but until we get an independant investigation of 9/11, Oklahoma City or any of these other false flag operations it's hard to know which bullshit to believe.
undiesinabunch 2 years ago
Just as I suspected ... the FBI created the group and tried to give them weapons. They do this to get anti-terror funding and to legitimize the MIAC Report and DHS Report demonizing patriots in this country.
undiesinabunch 2 years ago
They had been watching them for a year. All three were white I belive and were anti-Semites. Getting the C4 apparently wasn't enough for them. Actually pulling off SAM launchers? Too good to be true apparently. Tried to give them weapons? All of the stuff they gave was deactivated and inert. They set them up plain and simple. It kinda like when you hire a hitman to kill someone and he turns out to be an undercover cop. You got to bait them to get convictions or else they could walk.
JackJivewriter 2 years ago
I suppose you believe the official 9/11 story too. Enjoy!
undiesinabunch 2 years ago
lol
jjaaee 2 years ago
Nice shootin' Michelle! AK47 sound effect spot on BTW! I think she's aiming at the evil "Federal" Reserve banksters. I hope she takes out a few Rothschild zillionaires but unfortunately they're usually hidden from view doing their dastardly Zionist puppeteering behind the scenes.
undiesinabunch 2 years ago
Awesome, Headzup. Great job.
earlymid90schild 2 years ago
New York Terrorist i hope gets raped in Prison
jokerchat 2 years ago
"Mommy? Mommy?"
LarryKoopaRoy 2 years ago 2
ha ha i know XD
LilCaliBoycp 2 years ago
lol
LilCaliBoycp 2 years ago