Added: 3 years ago
From: blackhistorychannel
Views: 29,767
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (287)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • aahhh haa n they say racism is dead, BULLSHIT!

  • DANCING MONKEYS? i find that offensive as for the phone records if they prove him not guilty but sadly enough he is guilty he has proven this by his actions and his own words i dont think he did the actual killing but he knows who did maybe paid them to do it?as for the reference to the kind of woman he dates ITS NOT HER BIZ NOR IS IT MINE OR ANYONE ELSES what people should ask is WHY WOULD ANY WOMAN STAY WITH A MAN WHO BEATS HER AND POSSIBILITY HER CHILDREN???

  • @TheSinjingideon This is a paid commercial for this trash the morons at OMIG are selling. 99% of it is lies or gross exagerations of the situation. Phone records were given to everyone in this case but the records were transfered over to larger exhibits for use in court. They were later removed to keep the phone numbers from being leaked. Mainly to protect the Browns and others from badgering phone calls. Dont buy the lies people.

  • @TheSinjingideon You do realize that this video was designed to raise your blood pressure and make you angry enough to buy the crap they are selling right? They are praying on your hate of whites and anger to learn more about the story.

  • @mjmitch33 They're praying on your hate

    You pitiful toad!! You're still standing around begging people not to examine evidence we've posted and judge for themselves about the conspiracy behind this matter. Fingering Simpson was intended to anger poor ass racist white folk like you, to make you easier to manipulate, like hot molten iron, needed to pass a Patriots Act or Purse a Bin Laden or Al Qaeda. Now take you for instance, hot molten metal cooled into a dumb ass door knob.

  • @brotherap My ignorant nigga is back... I see you made bail early.. lol My nigga!

  • How the hell did OJ get away with two MURDERS, when he obviously did it, looking at all the evidence?! :/

    Oh yeah, the same individuals who voted for Bush to be in The White House, even though he was thick as pig shit Lol ;p.

    ONLY in America....

  • i woke up at 5am turned on the radio to hear who won the game the nite before. Instead i heard OJs ex had been killed. It took me 3 sec. to figure out he did it.

  • @PInk77W1 "i woke up at 5am turned on the radio ...i heard OJs ex had been killed. It took me 3 sec. to figure out he did it."

    They should've hired a silly MF like you to figure out who framed ROGER RABBIT!!!, maybe you'd have solved that one in 2 seconds. Meantime, we want these freaking telephone records they hid from the jury. Their lawyers' stipulation paints them into a corner, claiming the Browns made that Brentwood to Dana Point drive in approx. 45 minutes instead of 2 hr 15 min.

  • @brotherap speaking of silly MF isnt OJ in prison for life? Or was it 15yrs? In all my excitement i forgot the details

  • @PInk77W1 Yeah! They were able to allow you fools to get your jollies by hollering 33 years. A bunch of dummies run off with glee and fail to realize the silly judge still cited the word concurrent behind each sentence. On the other hand America's intellect in this feeble minded generation has been reduced to herd mentality about 6 points above official retardation & is probably too much to comprehend the meaning. squashed down we calculate about 7 years, 9 max. He's got about 3 more to do.

  • he did murder his wife and goldman

  • Cant you people see these are actors out to just get you juiced up. Great show you guys. Almost as good as OJ when he acted like he outgrew his gloves. lol

  • Black History Channel... yeah ok! What a joke!

  • Dr Henry got laughed at on the Geraldo show. They kicked him off mid show because he was spreading actual lies about a innocent dead man. IT is a shame that you guys back this guy. Even if he thinks he is innocent lying about the actual facts to make his point is as low class as Brotheraps breath.

  • Dr Henry Johnson is a total moron. This thing is a total scam as is Brotharap and all you other clowns that think this moron did not commit murder. He will die in jail hopefully with a foot up his but or a hand around his neck. Slowly@!

  • guilty as Casey only with more evidence!

  • those niggers on the jury didn't know DNA from the NBA

  • Those whiteys on the Casey Anthony jury didn't know evidence from twinkee.

  • @NkrumahTure

    Actually they did. Those jurors in the Anthony trial, not surprisingly mostly white, saw that tape around the kids' mouth didnt mean intent to murder, even if anthony did it.

    now those niggers on the jury in the OJ trial were stupid. dna AT the crime scene of a bludgeoning!!!!

    fuckin niggers

  • @duffy31311 : That's the obvious stupidity with those whiteys on the Casey Anthony trial. Those punks want their own to get off without punishment anyway. Its been that way for hundreds of years in the U.S. Rotten caucasians, that's why they're on the decline on this earth anyway...their losing, and bad. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

  • @NkrumahTure

    its about intent and motive. no intent and no motive. those blacks on the oj jury didnt know shit.

  • @duffy31311 : They knew more about evidence than that incompetent white jury in Florida did. That's why the other outraged white people want to get them almost as much as they want to get Casey Anthony. I don't blame them either. 

  • @NkrumahTure "That's why the other outraged white people want to get them almost as much as they want to get Casey Anthony. I don't blame them either."

    DON'T BE SO MEAN, BROTHER TURE!!! (lol) GO ON AND HANDLE YOUR BUSINESS!!!

  • @brotherap Thanks brother.

  • It is a disgrace upon black Americans that the majority seemed to support Simpson, just because he is black, when it was obvious to the world he was guilty. It was the bonfire of the vanities all over again and they set the cause of equality back by years.

  • A friend of mine who lives in Calafronia beleaves that Nicole was murdered over a drug deal that went wrong..But through her boyfriend who was that undercover cop..Sadly she thinks Ronald Goldman was at the wrong place and at the wrong time!..I don't personaly think it happen that way...Sorry i feel OJ Did it..To bad there's no security cameras around her place like some home owners had out there at the time

  • @Midnightryder7 Your friend has no clue and is uneducated moron. Dr Johnson should be found and beaten silly for spewing the crap he does and anyone who buys into this being a drug hit or mafia thing has no brain what so ever. OJ stabbed his own finger and bled when he left the scene. He lied, attempted suicide,apologized to police, told them he should be hurt and got away with murder. I would befriend your ignorant friend so you can seem normal at parties!

  • BUFFERING

  • It's time for so many of you who've seen this clip to acquire the guy who is holding the autopsy reports book "Pursuit of Exhibit 35 in the OJ Simpson Murder Trial and its Hidden Secrets" at amazon dot com books. His chapter on Johnnie Cochran going along with the phone record concealment to use as leverage to free a client imprisoned for 30 yrs Edgar "Geronimo" Pratt is truly fascinating. After Mandela was freed NGO organizations recognized Pratt as the longest political prisoner behind bars.

  • SPIN IT ALL YOU WANT,,,, DUDE DID IT. HEY WHEN LEATHER GETS WET IT SHRINKS. KNOW WHAT I MEAN?????

  • That is your way of not calling anyone in particular out and yet blaming the entire system. However the process you are talking about is full of individual actions. You cannot have one without the complete group going along. You avoid calling anyone wrong for doing anything and yet blame them all for the system. That is just retarded.

  • commenting on video poklease what does it matter what he dates i like girls with jet black hair .. oj liked white girls.. my friend likes asain girls and hes white... everyone has there preferance ... i think oj is innocent but ya i reallly could careless now cause hes gunna die in jail anyhow..

  • website? What website?

  • Geraldo should have been sued for miss stating the evidence. There are no records of a 11pm phone call. There was a mention of a 11pm phone call from the Browns the morning after their daughter was killed. The phone records brought into court showed the call much earlier. Even Johnny Cochran didn't argue the calls happened at 11pm. Believe me if the phone records showed a 11pm call Johnny's racist win at any cost butt would have been all over it. Let the call crap go it is a non issue.

  • @mjmitch33 "Believe me if the phone records showed a 11pm call Johnny's racist win at any cost butt would have been all over it. Let the call crap go it is a non issue."

    I bet you feel like you're spitting into the wind, huh fool! See just look at what you fools have done, you've got others excited about what's going on with the 11PM phone call. Now your sorry ass wants to haul Geraldo onto the carpet. Why not just tell these rats to replace these records from the unbiased GTE data bank???

  • omg white lady white world white power fail JASON SIMPSON MURGERED THEM THE EVIL FUCK

  • @DigiBullet23 If you believe Jason killed Nicole you are as dumb as the jury was. Did he borrow dads blood to sprinkle on the way out? Have you no clue what DNA markers are and how hard it would be to find the same DNA markers in anyone else other than OJ the real killer. You do know Jason would have 50% of his dads DNA and the rest would be totally different? You need to educate yourself on DNA, because you are obviously clueless.

  • @mjmitch33 ok mark fuhrer the DA took i believe 8 grams or mg of ojs blood at his house 6 hours he got to the lab with 6.5 ...they questioned him immediatly cause the record said 8.. he was later convicted of purgery and after the oj trial was convicted of tampering evidence in a different case years later... that explains the dna blood.. now to further more explain watch "The Overlooked Suspect" on google made by 7/ 30 year veterans of detection and are from diff parts of nation...

  • @DigiBullet23 No moron it does not, Blood that was planted from the sample that OJ gave would have had High levels of EDTA in it. None did. The blood found was from OJ's left hand next to his bloody shoe prints (size 12) and his hair and fiber from his truck matched as well. So many pieces of evidence that it would be impossible to plant it all. As for the 8ml of blood that was taken. Thano the person who took the blood estimated and again if it was treated blood the edta levels would have shown

  • @mjmitch33 what would u do if your son said he murdered your ex who u dislike anyhow...bet u ask a million fathers about 950k+ would say well ide help my son get outa trouble not call the police and say my son murdered my ex get him... a families love ties go deeper then some things did u ever think oj may have immediatly went to see what his son had done,... u clearly are single and childless

  • @DigiBullet23 If you think OJ was smart enough to plant all that evidence to convince the police to pursue him instead of his son you are a silly as the idiots that made this book,movie crap. OJ was for the first time in his life an outcast. He was forgotten by his exwife and kids that night, his girlfriend was banging Michael Bolton. He showed up and seen his kids asleep and a young white man coming to do his exwife and he lost it. There is NO evidence at all that Jason had anything involved.

  • @DigiBullet23 The fact that Jason left early was brought up in the civil trial was him trying to save his inheritance. It did not work. All this other crap is the black community trying to do two things. Make money off the ignorant and try to rebuild the murderers reputation by throwing out stupid rumors. The real evidence was OJ's blood not Jasons. The real evidence was the cut OJ to this day cannot explain and his Bronco leaving the scene. He was alone,he killed them both.

  • @DigiBullet23 as for what would I have done... if that was the case (and there is no evidence to say it was) I would have never made it look like I did it. the respect of my children would be of most importance to me. So no I would not have covered for him. I would have told what I knew and left it in Gods hands. I would have wanted Jason to take responsibility for it had he done it and I wish you morons would ask the same of OJ who did do it.

  • @DigiBullet23 You need to read the case more, you have many facts incorrect. The overlooked suspect is a marketing ploy to try and save OJ's marketability. Not going to work. He killed,lied,ran and did not even ask if his kids were ok. He is a murderer and if you let go of your anger toward the white race you will be able to admit it.

    The gloves fit,the blood matched, the shoes were his, the hair was a match,the fibers from his truck were there. He had no idea how he cut his finger? Seriously?

  • @mjmitch33 what u mean hatred for the white race im white and love all races u are a racist hence why u make nosense... The overlooked suspect is a documentary made for free and had no financial gain u are very dumb i feel sorry for you and i cant argue about this with you anymore cause your just making up your own facts with no hard copy send me links to this proof..yes 50% u need to educate yourself on dna cause in 1994 dna was nowere near as recordable as it is now...

  • @mjmitch33 family member dna results type that into google and tell me what u read about the 90's go fuck yourself seriously trhere was no hard evidence linking oj...... the haty had hair foilocules belongiung to his son who was never questioned or tested... because they showed matching parts with oj ..was enough for them to persue without really looking for the real suspect hence the overlooked suspect ... 3 of the detectives in the movie both state they changed minds enlight of new evidence..

  • @mjmitch33 and please when u say i have many facts wrong state whats wrong cause not one thing i said was wrong and u clearly didnt say one thing i said incorrect besides your dna rant which is bullshit ..your clearly a fat 33 year old queer who is also racist seeing as u brought race into this argument.. fat 33 year old loser..please give me A. what i said incorrect B. links proving your statements are true C.your knowledge of dna which is scued

    D.your proffesion backing this E.your race

  • LOL! The reason why the black lady doesn't have problems with OJ dating and marrying white women is because OJ is known to be abusive to his women and he even killed his ex-wife.

  • Learn how to spell Barack.

  • Slap that white bitch...... Someone please

  • @burlbark Racist fuck.

  • @GayUOPXBoy10 Hey fagg#t I had t call her a white bitch to differentiate her from the colored lady that was making sense. I am a Native American stupid.

  • @burlbark Try using her name, dumbass.

  • @burlbark All of these people are paid actors. They are paid to play on your anger and opinions on both sides. Make you emotional so you will want to buy this trash. Save your money, educate yourself with something that will be of some use to society. This is garbage.

  • I do not give a shit about mixed race couples or race at all. I am Daffy Fucking Duck though if you expect me to believe that OJ didn't kill Nicole and Ron. Good Grief People. Trying to rewrite history. OJ is a murderer and the world knows it. Let it go. He ain't worth it. He will rot in jail. There is justice after all.

  • Whenever the question is raised as to why a person dates someone of another race than their own, it is obvious there is a racist overtone to the question. Why should there be a specific problem? OJ and Nicole married out of mutual consent for that union, not because she is white. If there was objection to the union, then it would have been raised at their wedding, and the marriage wouldn't have happened. (Unless, of course, it took place in the South during segregation).

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK who is Joey Ippoleto? My mom is a lawyer and she is always talking about this case.. i tried looking it up nothing came up

  • This comment is not related to any video here. Someone purchased some dvd's from you many months ago. Please send her order. She has a youtube channel. Her name on youtube is 'Suzieferr'

  • this white women is obviously racists.

  • @emoviebuff87 i think she is a product of her times.

  • Go figure, a black woman talking to a white tree-ape?

  • Absolutely "Everybodys' got something to hide....cept for me and my monkey." Save yourself a lot of time with this case and purchase "OJ is Guilty But NOT of Murder" by William C. Dear to find the REAL killer and WHY OJ has risked everything to protect him.

  • why is this on the black history channel im sure there are some other great milestones in the black history I guess i didnt see OJ being one of them

  • oh yeah, it was just a big conspiracy, somehow the killer brutally murdered them and left no evidence of his own, but miraculously got OJ's blood mixed with both the victims in his car, home, and crime scene. It really is disgusting how people use race in cases like this. HE DID IT! t

  • That just shows the intelligence of Los Angeles lol

  • what an asshole.

  • For all those who believe OJ did it, then maybe you need to Type in Joey Ippoleto, in google. OJ to this day will never tell anyone in the media who did these killings. He knows his children will be next if he did. Thats all im gonna say.

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK Come on Robert. OJ is a murdering dog. You would believe a murderer that dropped his blood,shoe prints,hair,fiber,gloves,apolo­gized,confessed and ran? You do not believe someone like that you convict them. Wake the F up!

  • @mjmitch33 Go to the amazon dotcom book site; & purchase the book, mitch "Pursuit of Exhibit 35 in the OJ Simpson Murder Trial and its Hidden Secrets". Then examine the exhibits the author had the guts to publish in the book; then come back & tell us you don't believe they concealed records to frame OJ Simpson. Your problem is everything you have to offer is from the dirty well of LA Court Officers. Try some refreshing water from this book's well of knowledge, mitch, 'Pursuit of Exhibit 35".

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK For all of you that spend money trying to solve a crime that a man is in jail for you should google yourselves. If you do that the chances of you bringing in more illiterate children with racist views will be diminished. I think we should castrate Robertsinnewyork just to end the duh Gene before it is passed on.

    We need to put an end to the racist factions that continue to judge things by the color they are. Lets see this as it is. A abusive man that finished the process.

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK OJ was the killer, he acted alone. His kids have come to terms with it now so should you. No murder could have been sloppier. He left so many facts behind only the racism interjected into the case in a city where race was an issue kept him from conviction. Any jury with a brain could have realized that the blood and physical evidence was far too complete to be anything else. Sad that you cannot see that.

  • Did that Los Angeles bitch call her a monkey at 1:18!!???

  • yes i would like to see those phone records myself its almost laughable that the white woman complains and her observations on o js white world or bring up who he dates thats not the issue its the truth to 2 deaths that need to be answered and justice sought i have always believed the oj simpson didnt murder the two but i also believe he knows who did . what is there in those records something to hide like what? the truth maybe

  • @dragonguardians The credibility of the United States of America is at stake here. This case was promulgated all over the world, and used to enrage white folk which, IMO, became useful six years later when the Bush administration needed an enraged white America to give it a blind endorsement for the ultimate invasion of Iraq. The animosity abruptly shifted from hostility towards N-words to anger and hostility towards Sand N-words in the desert.

  • @dragonguardians The phone records were part of the trial, the jury seen an exhibit that both Johnny Cochran and the judge agreed to. There was a stipulation that the exhibit that was nothing more than the report without the phone numbers on it. They replaced the numbers with names to protect the families from the numbers getting out. That is all this is. If Johnny agreed to it in the exhibit it was because he could not argue the 11pm call because the actual phone records show it. Wake up yall!

  • Phone records don't exist.

  • The white bat is a classic case of arrogance & ignorance colliding

  • I think the white lady brought that up to demean the black lady. and make her feel bad. jmo

  • im white and i found that lady embarrassing. the second you bring race up like that, you've lost credibility and no one cares what you have to say

  • @dkatl She also made me cringe, the black lady is right, people have the right to choose who they share their life with without anyone else making it their buisness. And yes, I immediately had more interest in the black ladies point of veiw, as soon as the white lady opened her mouth and spoke she preffered to argue about race rather than the issue at hand. I think she does have a problem with it, and the black lady was very intelligent for not taking the bait and sticking to her issues.

  • @dkatl You do realize that the white lady in this clip is an actor that was put on to infuriate the same people that the marketing group thinks would buy this crap. It is a commercial to convince african americans into spending money to hear their hero OJ was innocent. All of it is crap, if you paid for it you show how illiterate you want to remain. Educate yourself with a book that will raise your level not lower you into even more anger and resentment.

  • see, this is exactly the reason the prosecution lost with idiots like this lady (yes, i know, she has nothing to do with the case but) the minute she brings up him dating white women (which has NOTHING to do with anything), I really stopped taking wat she said seriously b/c bringing that up shows you have a bigoted biased towards the guy.

    to tell ya the truth I think all 3 ladies in that frame were nutty but the one on the right was dumb as rocks

  • Why the fuck is this fail video called "Barack Obama speaks on new O.J. evidence?" I don't see him featured once in this video.

  • Kevs442 sick cunt

  • and notice how that annoying white chick switched the subject real quick when the phone records were mentioned....hahahaha.....

  • if the brown's are so adamant that OJ is the killer...why not let the phone records out????........oh i forgot, if they do allow that then, no money for them.....

  • @ShyeesTongue actually nothing they do now could over turn the verdict in either case. Besides OJ is avoiding paying them a dime. He is in jail only collecting his pension and that is not something they can attack anyway. So this is not about money. The phone records were used in court. The exhibit they built off the phone records was agreed to by Cochran and Ito because all it was was the chart of calls with names instead of the phone records. Nothing more.. this is a scam!

  • That white lady seems very bitter that OJ dates white women. Interracial dating obviously bothers her alot. LOL at the black lady outing her as the one all hot and bothered about it and not the other way round. It's true. Even when she brought it up she has to go and deny that and say she never brought it up even tho we heard her bring it up 10 times in the like less than 30 seconds before. She really makes for the LOLs. Unreasonable and ridiculous. Just hilarious really. Does herself no favors.

  • OJ is an asshole and definately was a domestic abuser but he was not proven to have murdered them. I do not believe he did it. And it is scary that the person who did is still running around out there free. I do believe he knows who did do it and is protecting them. And the police went so far with their show trial they will not backtrack and pursue the murderer. They are too invested in OJ having done it. Hence them planting evidence even back then. OJ was the neat conclusion. It was Jason.

  • I don't believe any such record exist. Johnny would of been sure to reveal them in court. It's bullshit I say.

  • @starsfound Phone records were in the trial but they prosecution used an exhibit instead of the actual records to protect the phone numbers of those involved. Cochran did not protest the exhibit, he had no basis as it was not changed. This is a farce! Wake up people read your transcripts. Records were in the case and removed to protect the numbers not the times.. wake up!

  • OJ simpson was legendary...infact he still is...

  • i really dont understand why people try to defend a serial murderer.

    because that is what o.j. simpson is.

    and yes , ive seen the naked gun.

    o.j. simpson was the most funniest man in the movie.

    buit that doesnt make it right.

    he is still a psycho.

  • They would frame him as they have done thousands of others in LA County in the Rampart Police Precinct scandal, because they could....No more, No less!

  • why would someone at the police .

    kill a few persons and blame o.j. Simpson.

    tell me

    if you know so much better

  • @ImmortalUniverse

    Where did you get the idea that someone at the police station killed a few persons?

    As stated previously, the LAPD has admitted to framing many people before, thousands of them as a matter of fact, according to the actual public record, so why not Simpson too!

  • never mind

    i had enough of o.j.simpson.

    he needs to stay in jail.

    and i dont believe in new evidence

  • and i dont believe in new evidence

    Is that just in the Simpson case or in any other circumstance regarding new evidence, because the above statement you made is quite broad. I take it that when investigators find that the DNA of an alleged rapist does not match the DNA of the actual offender, the long imprisoned accused individual should remain in prison according to you since "you don't believe in new evidence"?

  • no because in a real fair trial a person only goes to jail if the evidence was enough and clear to all.

    if there is something as new evidence and he would be set free.

    then your justice system failed the first time they found him guilty.

    how can they lock him up if they didnt had good evidence.

    i think thats stupid .

    besides the phonecall was enough to link o.j. simpson with the scene of the crime ,and the witnesses next door that heard them borh yell.

  • @ImmortalUniverse

    The phone call that I can only assume you are referring was the 911 call by Nicole made in 1993, on it was nothing more than Simpson shouting. The release & misrepresentation of the 911 call was enough for a judge to dismiss the grand jury deciding on a Simpson indictment due to its prejudicial impact upon the jury.

  • The 911 call was in 1993 a yr before the murders in 1994. Re: "a real fair trial"; in L.A. in 2000 the LAPD & LADA's office came under the scrutiny of the USDOJ because they admitted to framing over 3 thousand innocent men in "real fair trials" using planted evidence. These men were offered a "fair" choice, plead guilty and do 8 yrs in prison or go to trial and face 32 yrs in prison against a precinct with a 100% conviction rate. What would you do Immortal in this "real fair trial" situation?

  • @ImmortalUniverse

    Get back to the evidence in this clip Immortal, these investigators are showing you that the lawyers hid the telephone records from the jury that indicated OJ Simpson was on his flight to Chicago while his wife was alive talking to her mother on the telephone. If such evidence were to be revealed it would be superior to DNA or any other type of evidence but it would also present an embarrassment to local and federal government officials who covered this malfeasance up.

  • I have to agree. based upon the evidence presented I could not have found OJ guilty.

  • @brotherap Liar! No records were hidden. They were placed on an exhibit so the numbers could be protected and the names were put in place so the jury could understand it. No one hid anything. They did not show the jury the actuals they gave them something better. Cochran agreed on it,Ito agreed on it and if they had issues with the exhibits they could have argued that in court. They did not because they knew the phone records mirrored the exhibit in time and substance. Period! Brotha

  • @mjmitch33 "Liar! No records were hidden. They were placed on an exhibit so the numbers could be protected and the names were put in place so the jury could understand it. No one hid anything."

    Mitch, I guided you to a website in order to see the ridiculous document we posted alleging to be the Exhibit 35 phone records taken from Simpson's case file and sent by a pressured DDA Bill Hodgeman to our (OMIG) office but bull headed you refused to go there and examine them, just so to keep this up.

  • @brotherap The report of the 11pm phone call was not on the records. The 11pm came as a estimate from two very old people that had just been told their daughter was murdered. The records showed the call much earlier. The phone records were in court and viewed by the attorneys on both sides. It really is that simple.

  • @mjmitch33 "The report of an 11pm phone call was not on the records. 11pm came as a estimate from two very old people that had just been told their daughter was murdered."

    Juditha Brown appears to be much younger than husband Lou, however, she made her remark of being on the phone at 11PM three days after Lou to Shapiro after he'd been informed by defense investigators Juditha told them 11PM. When Shapiro asked "How do you know if was 11PM?" She said "I looked at the clock when I got home".

  • @brotherap OJ Appears to be much more guilty that Ron and Nicole as well. You stick with your theory that Johnny Cochran was a uncle tom and signed away OJ's freedom by agreeing that the phone records said 11 and he agreed to times much earlier. Stick to that... Dumb comments like that are what really show your true character.

  • @mjmitch33 You stick with your theory that Johnny Cochran was a uncle tom

    If you find anywhere that I stated a theory of Johnnie Cochran being an Uncle Tom I'll accept your description of being dumb & ignorant. Truth is you've again lied & misconstrued something in a manner so wildly out of order it indicates how mentally vulnerable a fool like you truly is. Now I see how easy it was for them to feed you some real BS. They knew how gullible & feeble minded fools like you really are.

  • @brotherap do not feel bad MJMITCH33 is a trolling loser seems he has a passionate hate for oj and i may be incorrect but race issues...he seems to have messaged on this for miles back on diff comments making up theories with falsified evidence... do not give him time of day

  • @DigiBullet23 "do not feel bad MJMITCH33 is a trolling loser seems he has a passionate hate for oj"

    It's too bad he's much like you say, though he attempts to hide it, the same way the lawyers concealed the crucial Juditha Brown telephone records. Mitch's attempt to poison peoples' minds from reading the book "Pursuit of Exhibit 35 in the OJ Simpson Murder Trial" is the act of a mentally retarded, very feeble minded individual. He doesn't realize that people are going to do what they choose.

  • @brotherap No the lawyers brought the phone records into court and agreed on the times of the phone calls. The only reason the actual phone records were not shown to the jury is because the numbers would not have made sense to the jury. The exhibit was created with the same times but they added names and removed the phone numbers. That was done to respect the privacy of the people on the records. That is it nothing more. This money making scam is twisting the evidence to make a buck.

  • @mjmitch33The only reason the actual phone records were not shown to the jury is because the numbers would not have made sense to the jury.

    There were approximately 6 other phone record exhibits, each one identified whose numbers they were & gives you their 10 digit exchange. Only Exhibit 35, the most crucial piece of evidence on whether OJ could've committed the murders or not was entered by stipulation & entitled "POSTERBOARD ALLEGED TO BE JUDITHA BROWN PHONE RECORD". Call for the records!

  • @brotherap No the lawyers brought the phone records into court and agreed on the times of the phone calls. The only reason the actual phone records were not shown to the jury is because the numbers would not have made sense to the jury. The exhibit was created with the same times but they added names and removed the phone numbers. That was done to respect the privacy of the people on the records. That is it nothing more. This money making scam is twisting the evidence to make a buck.

  • @mjmitch33" No the lawyers brought the phone records into court and agreed on the times of the phone calls."

    Screw all of your sorry ass excuses, we don't allow the privilege of presumption, no matter how long you beg for it. You need to ask, why aren't the records in the public case file? Why did the DDA Hodgeman apply for a one-party court order to secretly remove them? Why did he refuse to sign them out of the LA Sup.Court Exhibit Dept.? You nor the jury was allowed to examine the records.

  • @brotherap Ask Johnny or OJ.. wait they are dead or in jail. We Win! lol The records were there at the trial. You all know that. There was no secrets in the criminal trial. They were removed after the trial not before.

  • @mjmitch33 " The records were there at the trial. You all know that. There was no secrets in the criminal trial. They were removed after the trial not before."

    The records were allegedly in the trial, but the jury didn't see them. You & these clowns claim that they were so accurate the jury didn't need to see them. So they escaped jury examination & now they are no longer in the public case file courtesy of one of the slick attys in this trial. Now, no one outside can verify their veracity.

  • @brotherap the judge did.. the attorneys did.. all agreed and I am not retarded enough to think Johnny would concede anything in this case. Unless he knew he had no argument. Period and you know that as well. You will go to no length to make OJ look innocent. Arguing that his own lawyer was part of it.. get real donkey

  • @mjmitch33 the judge did.. the attorneys did.. all agreed and I am not retarded enough to think Johnny would concede anything in this case. Unless he knew he had no argument.

    Then the damn records should be in his case file & since we know they're not, you should be the main one demanding their replacement to bring calm to this whole affair. You should also demand to know why DDA Hodgeman would think he had a right to secretly remove all Simpson exhibits & place them in his personal storage.

  • @mjmitch33 I am not retarded enough to think Johnny would concede anything...Arguing that his own lawyer was part of it.. get real donkey"

    This is always the white man's Achilles' heel, the presumption that Machiavellian malfeasance wouldn't occur because one black man is going to protect another black man. You're a gullible fool, full of benign racial stereotypes; a dumb ass. It's your only hope that these white people didn't F***over you, by placing a bet on what you think Cochran would do.

  • @brotherap The white mans achilles heal? What kind of stereotype is that, lol You are such a freakin joke you are not even worth arguing with. I look at Cochran as I do all attorneys, There is no search for truth anymore it is about winning. If he had any evidence that would have helped OJ in the actual phone records he would have fought for them. However it is a fact that the times and the names in place of the phone records was all that was done. Anything else is you telling lies.

  • @mjmitch33 However it is a fact that the times and the names in place of the phone records was all that was done. Anything else is you telling lies."

    Then prove it, MF! Demand that these rotten people bring those phone records back into the Simpson case file from the GTE/Verizon Archive data bank. Then you can stop this BS whistling past the cemetery with your frightened ass. Don't bother me with your racial stereotype of what you presume Cochran would have done. Just bring the records!

  • @brotherap Answer the question. Is johnny a Uncle Tom working for the white man. I want to hear you say it...

  • @mjmitch33 Answer the question. Is johnny a Uncle Tom working for the white man. I want to hear you say it..."

    No, I don't think Johnnie Cochran was an UnlceTom working for the white man. I do think that Cochran after working in the DA's office was as Machiavellian as the white man and used this case for his own important interests. Interests which were more important than this white man's racial media creation, this anomaly entitled "The Trial of the Century" and it appeared to have worked.

  • @brotherap Call it what it is. You are saying Johnny Cochran worked with the white man while calling out Furhman and helping conceal evidence. lol You are hilarious. You know what... Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden were Wiggers too. They wanted OJ to get off. That is why they didn't enter in the the chase,the suicide note,the statement to the police. Man everyone in this case was on opposite sides of the law... crazy stuff. Get serious.

  • @brotherap Call it what it is. You are saying Johnny Cochran worked with the white man while calling out Furhman and helping conceal evidence. lol You are hilarious. You know what... Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden were wiggers too. They wanted OJ to get off. That is why they didn't enter in the the chase,the suicide note,the statement to the police. Man everyone in this case was on opposite sides of the law... crazy stuff. Get serious.

  • @mjmitch33 Man everyone in this case was on opposite sides of the law... crazy stuff. Get serious"

    You have to remember something! To these people you're nothing more than a member of a herd of cattle. They have no respect for you, & only feed you on a need to know basis, and what they fed you under the light of examination turns out to be contradictory BS that we have been challenging since 1997. They don't want, nor expect you to wake up, if you do they no longer get away with corruption.

  • @brotherap You have to remember something. Your only way of making sense is that everyone in the world was plotting against OJ. That is it. They all worked together (even Johnny). You I am sure grew up with parents that told you that everyone is against you. I am sure you were taught that if you could not accomplish something it was their fault. That is not life as we know it. They entire world was not plotting against OJ one of the most loved athletes of modern times until he killed two people.

  • @mjmitch33 Your only way of making sense is that everyone in the world was plotting against OJ. That is it"

    I only have to show that the precedent has been established & promulgated before in Los Angeles County. involving all of the same agencies. There's no question that it has, this is simply a revisiting of past precedents; in other words, "Same taxi, different driver". Once you have prior involvement in malfeasance there's no basis to consider extending the Privilege of Presumption.

  • @brotherap That is bull. You cannot assume the whole group is guilty of things just based on one or actions of some. The testimony of each person on the stand is that of an individual. What you say is racism of another kind. Saying that it has happened before and thus is happening again is not how the system works. If that was the case we could assume every person that has ever committed a crime is guilty from that point on of any other or similar item. Not how it works.

  • @mjmitch33 " If that was the case we could assume every person that has ever committed a crime is guilty from that point on of any other or similar item."

    California is certainly the exception, given the thousands of innocent men they were caught having framed in the Rampart scandal. I'm certainly not inclined to state as you have, "That's not how it works". It certainly appears to be "how it worked" for years as they framed innocent men & sent them to prison with ambivalence & impunity. CFTR!

  • @brotherap You also are leaning on the idea that these detectives were the ones that have done so before. There is no evidence that Vannatter,Lang or many others involved had been guilty of anything. Guilty by assumption is not quite fair. There are so many police officers and so many independent witnesses to say they all have reason to be untrusted is just your way of dismissing the evidence to free your boy. Call a Spade a spade!

  • @mjmitch33 You are placing the cart before the horse as usual once again, & this is how they continue to trick quick thinking feeble minded MFs like you. I never said to you that I was leaning on Vannatter, Lang or anyone else in particular having done this before. I don't know what malfeasance they were involved in before. In fact I made the analogy based upon the old euphemism "Same Taxi, Different Driver". In other words the same corrupt system after 30 years just has new players.

  • @brotherap lol

  • @brotherap Is it just a coincidence that the clips are from the Black history channel? Have you ever advertised on network TV? I would love to see these commercials on network tv so I could call the cable company and give them hell. I doubt that will ever happen though.

  • @mjmitch33 "I would love to see these commercials on network tv so I could call the cable company and give them hell. "

    You wouldn't have anything objective to talk about anyway but cable networks receive calls and letters from mentally challenged people like you all the time; they're used to it. They even send them free tickets to sit up front when they need the right kind of people to boo and hiss when they televise professional wrestling matches; and mj you certainly qualify for that.

  • @mjmitch33 "Is it just a coincidence that the clips are from the Black history channel?"

    Still looking for someone to gut? LOL You moron, these clips have been freely provided to any and all on-line networks that want them, start with Blip.TV, SPIKE TV, Google/Youtube, networks in the US, 2 in Japan, 1 in Belarus, Iran, India, Paraguay, Nigeria, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, Canada, Great Britain, and Jamaica just to name a few sightings.

  • @mjmitch33 They were removed after the trial not before.

    So what, what does that tell your dumb ass? The point is the 9:37 PM phone call as presented by stipulation is in conflict with the traffic data for the I-405 freeway & there is no way other than to demand the replacement of the records from the GTE archive to verify the allegation. Just like you this is a request that they have fought tooth and nail. Unfortunately for you clowns it's not going away & it nullifies everything else.

  • @brotherap BLAH BLAH BLAH.... the estimate of traffic is a estimate and the time they left the Messaluna was never exact. This Black History channel crap is just that crap. Money grubbing pos people that want to cash in. He was guilty he got away with it but he will always be known as the murderer. No one with a brain or the need to get back at Whitey would believe anything else. You do not want the phone records.. that is your only fact that we cant shoot down. Your all losers!

  • @mjmitch33 the time they left the Messaluna was never exact.

    Well, tell us what time they left the Mezzaluna since all of the witnesses from the restaurant said they left between 8:30&9:00. Neither end, nor the 8:45ish in between would've got them to Dana Point from Brentwood by 9:37 PM.  This is all we need to unravel that cheap suit with the gloves and EDTA. If Simpson was in the back of a limo at 11PM while his wife was alive you know where you can stick that EDTA along with the gloves.

  • @brotherap estimates... clock was not moved forward.. time estimates... phone records were shown... we cannot keep going over the same stuff.. you get me a show size measurements? You ever come up with a reason why the EDTA was sooo low? You ever figure out why the gloves fit.. why he had no explanation of the cut? Figure out why his Bronco was seen by Nicoles? any of that ever force you to investigate?

  • @mjmitch33 estimates... clock was not moved forward.. time estimates... phone records were shown... we cannot keep going over the same stuff.

    We'll continue going over this same stuff, over & over again, until your ignorant ass gets it & calls on these people to return these records to the Simpson case file. We want a vociferous national yell letting them know they can't hide these records. We're not presuming anything that allows anyone to participate in a grotesque & shameful frame up.

  • i just heard the 911 call of o.j. entering the house while nicole is scared at the phone telling hes going nuts .

    if that aint phone record enough for you ,then i dunno.

    i dont need the times of the call .

    its pretty obvious he was in the house when she called 911

  • @ImmortalUniverse it's pretty obvious he was in the house when she called 911

    So what! What did he do while in the house during the 911 call? And if the telephone records could exonerate him from committing these murders why wouldn't you want to know what they said?

    Or do you believe that this police department or DA's office wouldn't tell a lie and/or get themselves involved in manipulating evidence?

  • Comment removed

  • o.j. Simpson is a killer , he confessed .

    they probably checked his clothes after the arrest

    and believe me .

    if you hit a victum with an object /

    blood splatters will hit your skin and clothes with such a way .

    that you cant clean them 1.2.3.

    you cant even wash it out.

    so ill bet they caught him on that.

  • First, Simpson has not confessed to anything. Second, there were never any clothes that were cited for blood splatter, except some socks that Dr. Henry Lee clearly debunked because the same blood pattern appeared to go through one side of Simpson's ankle and come out the other side and appear exactly in the same pattern on the opposite side of his sock.

  • dude, he killed them, there is actually no other explanation, no one else to blame, he was even gonna kill himself because "he was the one who deserved to be hurt" its not about race, its not about people, its about a guy who murdered two people

  • @Jankunas

    No, Jankunas! There is plenty of other explanations most of them beginning with corruption within the police department. Second, no one is talking about race here, the investigator is telling you that they hid the telephone records that would have been in conflict with the impossible time that the Brown family claimed to have traveled home to make a 9:37PM phone call back to Brentwood. If you don't know the reality of the I-405 freeway you should not make a statement as if you do.

  • Well, if a man kills one of your family member, and he is a millionaire and he pays all the money hes got to the 3 best lawyers in the world, the family might have thought there was the possibility that he actually walked away freely, so the did whatever they could to proof that he actually did it, witch involves not releasing evidence that might set doubts to the jury. Its just common sense. Probably it set less timeframe to the crime, but still, it is not impossible that OJ killed two people.

  • Jankunas, the issue is whether OJ's in-laws arrived home by 9:37pm or as both initially stated, 11PM. The 9:37 PM call was entered by stipulation to avoid the jury. The journey is normally 90 minutes, the waiteresses said they left the diner for home, at @8:45PM, this would have given them only 45 minutes. If it was 11PM then OJ was in the backseat of a limo being driven to LAX airport for a 11:45 flight while his wife was alive talking on the phone to her mother.

  • Well, if a man kills ..and he is a millionaire and he pays all the money to get the 3 best lawyers in the world!

    Forget that madness, Jankunas, and examine the evidence only. Stop watching so much TV because they told you these were the best attorneys in the world. Truth is that they were not, and the so called best attorneys come out on a list relative to who makes the most money annually. They weren't even the 3,333rd best attorneys.