Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (943)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • RUSSIAN ARMY ARE THE BEST OF THE WORLD NOBODY CANT BE LIKE RUSSIAN AIR FORCE NOT EVEN UNITED STATED CONGRATULATIONS RUSSIA URAAAA

  • ha ha ha LMAO look at these noob comments here ..all fucking aviation experts and scientist XD

  • Beautiful plane. Congratz Russia!

  • Haha waiting for the first prototypes to land in India! Waiting to kick some of our neighbour's arse!!

  • Everybody copies. There isn't one country that's not guilty of copying at one point or another.

    The helicopter was conceived some time ago. Do you know by whom?

  • And cooler^)

  • HeHe

    Can we sell it to usa?

    It'll be cheeper than f35

  • this looks like a su 33 mixed with a f 22

  • Nice bird, but 20 years too late .....

  • This is not a real stealth plane but a copy of the F22, and a poor copy, it does not have special composite skin, instead is metal, does have one feature which is internal bomb bays, other than that it is just a cheap copy.....

    But good luck if you like it.

  • @yusafzai08

    This is total bullshit. It's clearly a su27 based design. If you say this is a copy of the F22 then what you really say is that the F22 is a copy of the su27.

  • @yusafzai08 inthernal bays- between engines.  it have spesial skin. and dont look like f-22

  • 3 axis thrust vectoring?

  • SLAVS TO IT BEST !!! LONG LIVE SRBIJA AND RUSSIA !!! NATO CAN SUCK OUR FAT COCKS !!!!

  • @RedBeretXXX you back again? I guess the last thrashing was not good enough for you, you want more Boris?

  • Russian made great airplanes, I can see T-50 still develop and testing, there are not yet hidden missile compartments. Will need some years to enter service.

  • Jebemti, dobar je!

    

  • Why do people try and compare F22 to PAK FA 50, USA spent more than 10 times on the F22 program than Russia did on FA 50. Secondly, FA-50 is roughly 3 to 4 times less expensive than F22 per unit, and it outperforms it in all aspects except overall stealth, software code, and some electronics components. Nevertheless, Russians are closing the gap very quickly; which is outstanding, considering they went through a near economic collapse only 10 to 15 years ago.

  • @tropickman More expensive doesn't mean better.

  • And, by the way, Sukhoi invented vectoring, so shut it.

  • I love it how Americans thrash talk here,,, Just shows how much they are scared.

  • russia/china = junk material

    thats a known fact..... all bark, but no bite.... you folks think wayyyyyyyyyy too highly of yourselves... But you know what? Maybe a war with iran wouldnt be soo bad after all, no would it? We can all put our weapons to the test and see who really is more superior than who... put up or shut up chinks...

  • @isaanStyle55 Russian material = american material... both made in taiwan.....

  • @Shazeen82 NHAHAHAHA

  • @Shazeen82 U.S.weapons = toys for the killing (genocide), the shepherds

  • @isaanStyle55 America NEVER encountered with Soviet Russia ever during the cold war... so why you enshure in your victory? I think just the USA the most agressive country in the world... Iran doing nothing just israel needs a war...... it hink they fucked up

  • @isaanStyle55 Iran is Iran. They have planes from the 70s. nice try tho bud 

  • @DJonX7

    They also have a fair amount of American weapons, which makes isaanStyle55's comment even funnier.

  • so what makes this jet stealthy? is it made of the same secret material created by lockheed? no vector engines? hmmmmm.... stealthy?

  • This thing is gonna kick the f22's ass

  • I love the soundtrack! I believe that is "Disturbed", from America (the USA).

    This plane looks very respectable. However, a long plane equals large angular momentum and slower turning. Bigger is not always better. That is why the 4th gen F-16's kicks so much ass with their new engines. For larger fighters, you need serious thrust vectoring like the F-22 (not that slow-motion stuff like on the experimental SU-37).

  • almost like F-22,am i right? but thinner than F-22

  • красава!

  • Easily the best looking plane in the sky.

  • 1:22 Thats a good boy! xD

  • 35 are F-22 Pilots.

  • looks like the FIREFOX

  • u know, the artist impression of the sukhoi t50 is much sleek looking than the real sukhoi... It looks more stronger and stealthier... The real sukhoi looks so fragile... But what the hell... The Russians always made the best and cheapest warplanes with kick ass features even though they look so fragile and simple that the American fighters... Cheers and God bless Russia... From India....

  • Ну я конечно в шоке... Все новейшие российские разработки уже американские специалисты изучают.... Разве можно военные разработки в СМИ выкладывать???

  • q yankies de mierda como la tienen con el F-22

  • It looks similar because it's hard to design a jet with stealth capabilities.

    And the F-22 has a very successful design.

    Thats why most of the stealth planes look similar.

  • russia pleaseeeeee....fuck em all!!!!!!!!!!

  • wow... similar to the F-22 but also distinctly russian

  • Damn this looks like an F-22 with SU-35 Camo

  • awsome design yeah but to much copy of other plpanes ...

  • @lap116 copy? ^^

  • @TheKiwiSniper yeah F-22 and little bit of F-15 whit some MIG-29 ......

  • i love how its so thin and wide. awesome design.

  • Тема Disturbed - Stricken здесь как нельзя кстати!!! Great!!! AWESOME VIDEO!!!

  • Haha An American band, Disturbed. And its not even ligit!!!

  • Улыбнул крузак на заднем плане =)

  • Кстати ПАК-ФА попадет на вооружение экземпляром в 10 штук к 2018 году -_- к этому времени армия США получит тысячи новейших самолетов.

  • Znów rześta zerżneli z F22

  • Anyway regardless of my previous comment, this plane is pretty wicked looking and the vid is sweet

  • Пожалуйста. Крымская (там где Нахимов), Русско-Японская (там где Цусима), Первая мировая (позорный мир с Германией с потерей территорий), Польский поход Тухачевского, Афганская (договор с Масудом,чтоб не мешал уходить), Первая Чеченская-ну тут ясно. Это только прямые неудачи. А есть еще и провалы стран, напрямую управляемые из кремля. Ангола (война с ЮАР), Корейская(там гдеМак Артур), Египет-Израиль (все войны), Родезия (победил Мугабе,а не Нкомо). Ну и Кадыров (герой России)

  • @MrCasspir Спасибо за ответ. Если внимательно посмотреть на все эти войны, при каких из них Россия напала первой, и при каких не достигла своих целей?

  • @MrCasspir Чего еще ждать, если воюют не ради победы, а для того, чтобы распилить бабла.

  • Nice American soundtrack... Disturbed anyone?

    This fighter looks impressive. I'm anxious to see if it can turn hard and fast like a Raptor (none of that slow motion bi-plane movement of the SU-37).

  • @MrGriff305

    Disturbed! THANK YOU for naming the group for me. I've been trying to put my finger on it for a few days now.

  • @MrGriff305 I could turn as fast and better than a f22, thats what Russia is all about.Historically it has brought out better planes at cheaper prices, unfortunately sold it to stupid arabs who can barely fly.The su 30, 35 maneuvers better than a f22, so I guess this one would be way ahead.

  • U.S can not operate proper numbers with the costs too high, thats why the Germans lost ww2, their tech was so advanced, too complicated and expensive for the numbers- yeah what you said just proved that the F-22 has better tech. And don't say crap about the Aurora not existing. I know ppl who worked on the dang thing. Yeah the t-50 is great and all, but look what they copied it off of- the f-22. Yet another showcase of the superiority of American engineering and ingeuity.

  • @roshambo54 Схожесть с F22 по внешнему виду, обосновано лишь аэродинамикой планера! и всё! ни о каком "подражании, и речи быть не может.

  • Nobody should come here hating on the Russian Aircraft. They're good. The new ones ( not the Soviet ones that keep getting refurbished). But be real, be informed, the United States air force is the strongest air force in the world by a huge margin. I'm Eastern European you pizdas :)

  • @sorum Сам-то, понял что сказал? Мы говорим не о все структуре ВВС России или США, мы говорим об конкретном самолете ПАК ФА. (пробуем сравнивать его с другими аналогичными).

  • @sorum no in the future, U.S aircraft costing way too much, F22 200 million a peace, T50 estimated 60 million in full production.... U.S techs, Union workers, defense company's clearly milk the government and taxpayer for money. The U.S will bankrupt itself, other nations do not have to do anything. on top of this all, the U.S can not operate proper numbers with the costs too high, thats why the Germans lost ww2, their tech was so advanced, too complicated and expensive for the numbers..

  • this is stupid. how can people win wars if everybody can't shoot each other's asses coz all of them are in stealth mode and no can see shit on each other's radar ? ;)

  • I would love it if america and russia got together at a testing area in nevada, and had a one on one fight between the PAK FA and the raptor. Then we would see which one was better.

  • @FlankerVT Зачем в Невада? лучше уж вы к нам на Алтай!)))

  • @FlankerVT Зачем в Невада? лучше уж вы к нам на Алтай!))) (хотя вы правы, Невада более подходящее место! ;-)

  • @Duke63RUS

    Любое место, это хорошо. Но она должна быть достаточно большой для надлежащего тестирования. Я думаю, это было бы отличной идеей. На самом деле, я предпочел бы F-22 бой Су-35, так как Су-35, похоже, что это все же лучше в собачьих боев, чем пак.

  • @FlankerVT Я не буду говорить что ПАК ФА безусловный убер самолет. от пилота много зависит! только вот у ПАК ФА есть АФАР, который увидит цель раньше чем это сделает F22. при этом условии не трудно предположить, что F22 сначала обнаружит ракету в него идущую, а потом (если повезет) сам ПАК ФА! - это первое. второе,- на Су35 стоят двигатели которые изначально тестировали для ПАК ФА, - следовательно о маневренности, нам еще предстоит узнать! когда Су37 и ПАК ФА проведут учебный бой. поживем увидим

  • @Duke63RUS

    It would be interesting to see what will happen if the PAK fights the su-35. THe SU-35 is my favorite russian plane, and I think that it is still very strong. I would not be surprised if the su-35 still scored highly against the PAK. Let me know what the results are when it happens.

    What do you think about China's new j-20?

  • @FlankerVT Трудно что либо сказать, кроме внешнего вида и первого полета, больше ничего не известно об J-20. Судя по его большому корпусу, он может летать далеко, и нести в себе много полезного груза. Скорее всего там реализована технология Stels, на счет сверх маневренности я не уверен. В скорости тоже вопрос, внешний вид лопаток двигателей смущает.

  • Странно видео про русский самолет, а пишут все на английском, друзья, пока войны нет, нет смысла бояться русских :)) Подумаешь в оборонную промышленность стали вкладывать в 5 раз больше чем раньше и эти расходы растут, просто Вы снова стали видеть сильную Россию, а не той, которой она была с 1991 по 2008 год.

  • Ths plane could be very good. I can see frontal optics exactly like the french rafale. This is usefull to detect and follow ennemy targets at more than 100kilometers. The plane can stay stealth without emitting any radiations. Russians are more clever than americans with F22 and F35. Somebody has informations about datalinks and radar capabilities of this plane ? And the price ?

  • I work in the Sukhoi .... And I'll tell you all ... Russian T-50 PAK FA aircraft greatly exceeds the U.S. software. Stupid Americans say the opposite .. T-50 has an excellent system attacks.

  • @TheBukr F-22 and the F-35 will fuck that flying piece of shit up! You work at Sukhoi so how do you know what the F-22 can do?

  • @jhskay556 Software from Russian aircraft better ...

  • @jhskay556 I'm not interested in your fighter ....

  • @TheBukr what? you claim you work at sukhoi and say the T-50 PAK FA has superior software how do you know if your working in Russia TRYING to keep with US technology....as a matter of fact isn't that one of the reason the Soviet Union fell? Russia going bankrupt trying to keep up with American technology

  • @jhskay556 Which american technology?Pilot in F22 cant breath...If you wan't to talk me about Auroras and other s..t,please don't,first give me proof to see that Aurora exist,and if you wan't to talk about not-finished planes,look cockpit of N/A ;) made by Serbia,plane never finished because of NATO's attack...

  • @SerB17995 I'm confused: what do you mean by "F-22 pilot can't breath"?

  • @MatteoriteX gizmodo.com/5852804/surprise-1­50-million-f+22-fighters-are-s­hut-down-again read,learn about great US technology ;)

  • @jhskay556 Russia going bankrupt?? They are not the ones who have a 13 tr. dollar dept on their necks, the States are...

  • @Jora000111 i said thats why the SOVIET UNION went bankrupt dickhole u do know the cold wars over i was talking in past tense you fucking idiot

  • @jhskay556 Ohh ..... I will not lose to you precious time ... The conclusion of your identity obvious that you do not know anything about Russia, and especially do not know anything about fighter ... Bay!!

  • @jhskay556 The actually went bankrupt surpasing alot of it... the Kirov, dominated the crusier class so much its scary... Acula, Alfa and typhoon class subs, deeper diving (by a shit load 1400ft vs 2300ft), could take direct hits from torpedo due to twin titanium hull plus faster (alfa) and quieter (acula)... yea f22 all that but can't manuver like the su37 (yea wow its not stealth but neither is the f22 since the su37 uses IR as a primery) now alot of american is better to but not all

  • @jhskay556

    How do you know the f-22 and f-35 are better than the T-50 ? There is really no way to tell but the t-50 is obviously a better fighter than the f-35(which is more of a bomber than fighter because its not maneuverable at all and is a much weaker fighter than the F-16 because of that)

  • Exactly the f-22 was canceled because it's shit T-50 is a real fighter

  • @81sci Lol no it was canceled because the program cost as much as a bank bailout.

  • @cwbane Then maintaining the program would have been a better option then a bank bailout...

  • @TheBukr looks like that thing is just one big copy of an F-22 anyways besides the engines

  • @jhskay556 This aircraft is a copy of the Russian fighters previous generation ...

  • Will the production T-50's have 3d thrust vectoring, or will they opt for 2d thrust vectoring nozzles as the F-22 Raptor has?

  • Why do russian aircraft take so long to develope by the time they come out there is either new tecnology or there almost totaly absolte

  • @USMC177597 They'd rather continue improving and building planes they feel are "good enough" like the Mig-29. Where we jump into it and slow other production to speed up development of new designs. Like when the F-22 went into production F-16 and F-18 was halted completely shortly after.

  • @USMC177597

    Well, bear in mind that this aircraft project suffered greatly owing to the fall of the USSR, whereas the American F-22 never suffered from such tremulous economic environments.

  • russians are the best in thrust vectoring

  • Поглядим на этот "суперсамолет" когда его примут и пустят в производство.. еще переделывать по 20ть раз будут чтобы хоть чтото мог. Да и кста кто знает где у него вообще ракеты крепятся? Ниразу никак ваще непонял.

  • @Namdaguda Внутри фюзеляжа

  • @Namdaguda Как читал, аж 4-е самолета уже построили, я думаю серийно он производиться не будет, слишком дорогое удовольствие, скорее всего малыми партиями, а для ракет думаю соорудят что-нибудь.

  • F22 without thrust vectoring.haha

  • @frentrup wtf ??? What do you min ???

  • @frentrup PAK FA have 3D thrust vectoring in the pitch and yaw axis, while F-22 only has 2D thrust vectoring.

  • @frentrup lol dipshit. Pak Fa has even better thrust vectoring than the F-22. Stop embarrassing Americans with your stupidity.

  • looks like the raptor only bigger,,bet the russains have just one plane ,,they cant afford anymore than that lol

  • @gnthndrw Actually, it looks like China's fifth generation fighter copied the design, because they look very similar!

  • @gnthndrw "The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 lacked funding for further F-22 production." "Only 173 aircraft were built before program cancellation"

    "Sukhoi director Mikhail Pogosyan has projected a market for 1,000 aircraft over the next four decades, which will be produced in a joint venture with India, 200 each for Russia and India and 600 for other countries."

  • @gnthndrw SU 37 is the best on the sky. Twice better than any other available fighter on maneuvers.

  • 2:22 what a beautiful nose.. looks a bit like the f111.. but a lot prettier :)

  • You were doing ok till i heard the music....

  • Kako mocno kad cujem zvuk zaplace mi se ! Rusi kad nesto naprave pa to nemoze da nebude dobro ! Russian brothers !!!

  • amazing

  • WTF!?NEW VERSION RUSSIAN SU????

  • Russian military= JOKE

  • @cshawn07

    American trolls = JOKE

  • A long plane is hard to turn... that's called moment of inertia and conservation of angular momentum.

  • @cshawn07 :facepalm: It`s very fat trolling. LOL

  • In Soviet Russia....blah, blah blah.

    China is looking more of a threat than this imbeciles.

  • @IauthenticI

    I'd say Russia's still more of a threat. They have a submarine fleet that's more than capable of giving the US navy one hell of a headache, and still supplies China with most of its weaponry. Russia could also very, very easily muck up American efforts to stabilize Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.

  • @MatteoriteX Россия очень добрая страна, населенная добрыми людьми! не нужно нас бояться, все страшные убийственные вооружения нам нужны не для того что бы нападать, а для того что бы защищаться! Посмотрите историю, никогда Россия не нападала первой! Никогда не придумывала предлогов что бы напасть, так как это делает США и Великобритания! У нас много чего есть и нам нужно это беречь. ;-)

  • @Duke63RUS

    Indeed, don't take what I said the wrong way. I was simply stating my opinion that Russia is militarily more powerful than China at the moment. I have a tremendous respect for Russia, and the majority of assholes in these situations are Americans.- just look at the comments on this video below.

  • @Duke63RUS солидарен!!!!!

    все войны от НАТО и США.....

    если кто не согласен пусть глянет в в учебник истории и посмотрит сколько раз НАТО развязывала войны,и сколько раз была атакована из вне......нам русским чужого не нужно,но и свое мы не отдадим.....у нас территории и природные запасы самые большие в мире.....в России поместятся 3 США и еще миллион квадратных километров останется...пак-фа еще одна гарантия того что на нашу землю не посягнет агрессор......МИРУ МИР!!!!!!

  • @Duke63RUS "Посмотрел" историю.Практически во всех войнах "миролюбивая" Россия терпела позорные поражения.Вне зависимости от качества оружия. Вы добрый народ, да только правят и правили вами злые вороватые карлики.

  • @MrCasspir Очень стало интересно, в каких войнах Россия проиграла. Если не трудно напишите пожалуйста.

  • @Duke63RUS Себя защитить мы не сможем 100%. наша армия уступает даже шведской (!!!) по крайней мере по количеству 9по качеству я вообще молчу). Единственное чем можно гордиться, это умом Советских конструкторов, благодаря которым Россия еще жива.

  • if we had an alien invasion attack.. would these work well?

  • @serpentphoenix No! Nothing will work.

  • @2tame4fame  well.. shit.

  • @serpentphoenix

    Consider the fact that any stellar navigations conducted in a timely manner requires mastery of an enormously powerful energy source. The aliens would be able to simply bombard us from orbit, wiping out any military targets at the flick of a switch with tremendously powerful weaponry we could only dream of.

  • It's not stealth. At least prototypes definitely are not. They have conventional metallic skin. And no radar blocker in intakes.

  • for f's sake people, it's just a beautiful hunk of metal, get over it.

  • Russians are good at building good aircraft. Too bad they don't get to try the in war. Hopefully they will never have to do it.

  • Comment removed

  • Why does everyone write such long comments? Can't you chose a few choice words to express your opinions or to mock someone else's opinions?

  • @Romagatyr Have you ever heard about "freedom of speech"? Maybe you`re just a slow reader... :)

  • i wish im born russian

  • srak fa hahaha

  • what will they think of next?? mobile suits?? sooner or later we'll be seing gundam suits in test flights or weapons demonstrations... nice background song though...

  • I like this one more than the F-22.

  • @cayetanoluis A radar cross section is basically the amount of radar waves a plane sends back once it's been hit with radar. It's how radar operators can tell what there focusing in on is a bird, a plane, or a really big fast bomber with a nuclear payload, lol. As the radar sweeps around it sends out waves, and as it does this constantly, it can tell, depending on how much of the wave comes back to them, how big an object is, how fast it's going, and in what direction its going.

  • Nice looking jet.

  • Comment removed

  • in the movie top gun there was a scene where the f-14 had an engine blow out and because of the space between each engine being so much it went into a flat spin right? Every jet since has either a single engine design or the twin design with the engines really close together. It seems off to that much space between the engines on this Russian Jet. It is amazing but having said what I have where do the U.S Jets have there rear facing radar? 

  • @shtzcreek The newer American jets don't use rear facing radar because they use something closer to an omni-directional passive radar, eliminating the need for older tech like that

  • @MajorWiz4rd Oh ok thanks

  • Comment removed

  • @cayetanoluis Open your mouth to tell you....Secreto

    

  • Think real! These things costs too much to actually fight with them,,,

  • @eginators34 LOL, so true

  • @eginators34 hahahahaha for who for Russia ? lol u must be too dumb....

    When Russia has enough money to have more than 60% of the nuclear power of all the world why wouldn't it have for 1000 Stealth Fighters

  • @FILIP789987 Oh, maybe they should use most expensive fighter jets as ammo? Only because they can afford them? Might sound as great idea for you...

  • @FILIP789987 Видимо вы очень молоды, или не знаете сути 1990-2000 годов России.

  • @eginators34 Yeah thats true, i just checked that this aircraft cost 4 times cheaper then f-35. If i had a choice i'll by 4 pak fa instead of 1 f-35 or su-35.

  • @eginators34

    the are not F-22 that kosta quart of a million :) and this guy can bite not onle on paper like f-22 =Craptor

  • @KRAJISNIK21 watch?v=qzt7uaNBrI4&feature=re­latedb  F22 - 350000000 $

    PAK FA -100000000 $

  • @ensebalis

    lets split the bill and buy 2 of them hehe ;-) peace bro

  • BRATE, SVAKA CAST ZA OVAJ KLIP. IPAK JE OVO SUHOJ!!!

  • which song is that?

    can someone tell me the song?

  • Yo I love your Videos keep em coming :) what rock song is that by the way? at 0:56

  • Comment removed

  • The experimental Su-37 already had some sick maneuvrability, wonder what this one is gonna be able to do. Looks pretty good too, although not as good as the 47.

  • american technical ingenuity always outmatched russian, now suddenly they r failing against a foe they know so well and work well against everytime!? i think this is so suspicious, something has been down to american enginneering and ingenuity, me suspects it has been co-opted from above by deliberately bad management and treasonous decision to downgrade the f-22 original capabilities. looks like the kgb have thoroughly penetrated industrial development process to undermine american defence.

  • @mikefan09 .../watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M

  • @mikefan09

    The barriers that existed during the cold war have long since vanished. Advanced electronics and the like are easily available to anybody that has the money to buy the technology. But the Russians have a lot of talent as well.

  • @MatteoriteX yes agreed, also well put. but i include in my suggestions conclusions drawn from the testimony of defectors such as anatoly golitsyn and oleg gordievsky as well as colonel stanislav lunev, of very signifcant import, that american military industry, economy will have to be degraded, as well as diplomatic standing and increasing diplomatic isolationism, as well as wearing down and distracting their military while make believing to america that they have won over communism, before..