Inconsistent refereeing - you dont need the hammerhead when the Gladiator is still on the bridge (alebit defenceless) but you do when the gladiator and there hammerhead are off the bridge?
Inconsistent refereeing there! Hammer loses his hammerhead and is deemed out of the game and thus it is fine for the challenger to not lose their hammerhead. Yet Glacier falls off yet the challenger still needs her hammerhead. How is Hammer undefended on the bridge more out of the game than Glacier who is completely off the bridge?
Kaynas1988, we did as such, but it wasn't billed like that, we had the Team Sports Challenge, and the Olympic Athletes specials, those were our celebrity specials.
Inconsistent refereeing - you dont need the hammerhead when the Gladiator is still on the bridge (alebit defenceless) but you do when the gladiator and there hammerhead are off the bridge?
aquaplex2006 5 days ago
Inconsistent refereeing there! Hammer loses his hammerhead and is deemed out of the game and thus it is fine for the challenger to not lose their hammerhead. Yet Glacier falls off yet the challenger still needs her hammerhead. How is Hammer undefended on the bridge more out of the game than Glacier who is completely off the bridge?
aquaplex2006 1 week ago
@aquaplex2006 Inconsistent refereeing or inconsistent rules?
TheFaceEmperor 1 week ago
Kaynas1988, we did as such, but it wasn't billed like that, we had the Team Sports Challenge, and the Olympic Athletes specials, those were our celebrity specials.
TheFaceEmperor 1 month ago
Did they have any celebrity specials of Australian Gladiators
Kaynas1988 1 month ago