SHIAISM IS SUCH A SATANIC FIRQA THAT THERE IS NO EXAMPLE ON EARTH. IN THIS SATANIC FIRQA, ALI IS IMAM AND HORSE IS ALSO IMAM. THESE MUNAFIQEENS DO SIJDA TO GRAVE OF ALI AND ALSO DO SIJDA TO HORSE. THESE MUNAFIQEENS TREAT ALI AND HORSE EQUAL. THESE MUNAFIQEENS CLAIM TO LOVE ALI BUT NEVER ACCEPT ANY SON OF HASAN AS IMAM. THESE MUNAFIQEENS CREATE FUSS ON DEATH OF HUSSAIN BUT NEVER CURSE AND INSULT ABBASID CALIPHS WHO KILLED THEIR SIX IMAMS. EVEN THESE MUNAFIQEENS NEVER DO MATAM FOR HAMZA.
ALI HAS NO LINK WITH SHIAS AS ESSA HAS NO LINK WITH CHRISTIANS AND MUSA HAS NO LINK WITH JEWS.
SYEDNA ALI HAS RELATIONSHIP OF MARRIAGE WITH THREE KHULFAS AND SHIAS CURSE THREE KHULFAS AND THUS SHIAS INSULT ALI. SHIAS REJECTQURANIC AYATS. TO HIDE THEIR SATANIC BELIEVEE, SHIAS USE NAME OF ALI.
NO SHIA ON EARTH CAN BRING PROOF OF BASE OF SHIAISM I.E. INFALLIBLE IMAMS FROM QURAN MAJEED. NO SHIA ON EARTH CAN REPLY THAT WHY SHIAS DONT ACCEPT ANY SON OF HASSAN AS INFALLIBLE IMAM? WERE SONS OF HASAN NOT PIOUS? WERE THEY NOT FROM AHLE BAIT? HOW IT IS POSSIBLE THAT HUSSAIN'S SON ZAINUL ABDEEN (WHOSE MOTHER SHAHAR BANO WAS A PERSIAN PRINCESS AND SHE HAS NO LINK WITH PROPHET,SAW) IS IMAM. SHIAS CLAIM THAT THEIR IMAMS ARE FROM AHLE BAIT BECOMES WRONG. HUSSAIN HAS PROVED SHIAS ARE LIARS.
“O Prophet! Say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.” (Quran, 33:59)
Here, Allah uses the plural word for daughters, not the singular form. Allah uses the term “banaatuka” which means “your daughters.” If it was one daughter only, it would be “bintuka.”
at least Quran tells the most pious and pure souls were ahlebait, who are also leaders of heaven too. hehehheheh.
you should prove ur kalifs as they were better than ahelabit, if u could, can u ? you can never but still will run behind ur fake 3 kalifs, who had ruined the face to true islam by their negligence.
This is an open challenge for the Shia to give Quranic verses which outline and justify the Shia concept of Imamah. Can the Shia produce even a single verse outlining Imamah, without any additions to the translation, without parenthetical insertions to the translation, without Hadith to “support” their interpretation, without Tafseer, and without their own personal commentaries leading us from verse to verse?
Once there was an altercation between the Prophet and Ayesha when they found Abu Bakr as judge. Hazrat Ayesha said to the Prophet: ‘You speak but don't speak except truth. At once Abu Bakr gave her such a slap that blood began to ooze out from her mouth’.
Ihya Ulum-id-din by Imam Ghazzali, Volume 2 page 36,
ALI THREE SONS NAMES WERE ABU BAKR, UMAR AND USMAN AND HASAN SON NAME WAS ABU BAKR. ALL SHIA IMAMS DAUGHTERS NAMES ARE AYESHA, WHY ALI AND AALE ALI KEPT THEIR CHILDREN NAMES ON THREE KHULFAS AND UMUL MOMNIN AYESHA? THEY WANT TO SHOW TO THE WORLD THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP WITH SHIANE IBLEES WHO POSE AS "LOVERS" OF AHLE BAIT BUT ARE IN FACT DECEIVERS AND KILLERS OF AHLE BAIT AND TO HIDE THEIR SATANIC ACTS, THESE RIYKARS POSE AS AZADARS.
AISHA HERSELF UM-E-SALAMA HER SELF ARE WITNESS WE ARE NOT AHLEBAIT
IS THERE ANY COMPARISON BETWEEN ONE SIDE ABUBAKR, TO WHOME GOD EVEN DID NOT LET PREACH ABOUT ONE SURRAH (BARAAT) AND OTHER SIDE GOD ASKED MUHAMMAD SAW TO TAKE UR SONS, WOMEN, NAFS AGAINST CHRISTIAN. GOD CHOSED THEM FOR HIS DEEN ISLAM.
IS IT STILL HARD TO KNOW WHOME TO FOLLOW?????
BUT MUNAFIQ WILL STILL GO AGAINST GOD. AND WILL SAY I CAN CHOSE BETTER THAN GOD.
ALLAH SAYS ALL WIVES OF PROPHET,SAW, ARE AHLE BAIT AND MOTHERS OF BELIEVERS, THEY REJECT IT. ALLAH SAYS LAST PROPHET,SAW, HAD DAUGHTERS (PLURAL) THEY REJECT IT , ALLAH SAYS IN SURAH NOOR AYESHA IS INNOCENT, THEY REJECT IT. ALLAH SAYS IN SURAH FATH THAT HE WAS PLEASED WITH BELIEVERS (FOUR KHULFAS AND SAHABAS) WHEN THEY WERE TAKING BAYT UNDER TREE, THEY REJECT IT. ALLAH SAYS BELIEVERS WILL SEE ALLAH ON DOOMSDAY, THEY REJECT IT.
WHO CAN BELIEVE THAT SHIAS BELIEVE IN QURAN MAJEED?
MUHAMMAD SAW NY HAKIM OUR US K BETY MARWAN KO SHEHR BADAR KAR DIYA THA JAB K USMAN US KO APNI HAKOMAT MAIN WAPIS LY AYE OUR MARWAN SY APNI BETI KI SHADI BHI KAR DI, PHIR WO BAG-E-FIDAK JU ABUBKAR NY BIBI FATIMA A.S KO JU UN KA HAQ THA NAHI DIYA THA, WO USMAN NY MARWAN KO GIFT KAR DIYA, US MUNAFIQ KO JISY NABI SAW NY SHEHRBADAR KIYA THA.
@hobabdabiel ........ Whatever happened in history, it is just history and we still dont know wat had happened in real. We all have to respect Sahaba. Prophet Muhammad said" if you hate my sahaba, it means you hate me (Muhammad), & if you hate me then it means you hate Allah as well. .... So please think and change the mind set.
This is an open challenge for the Shia to give Quranic verses which outline and justify the Shia concept of Imamah. Can the Shia produce even a single verse outlining Imamah, without any additions to the translation, without parenthetical insertions to the translation, without Hadith to “support” their interpretation, without Tafseer, and without their own personal commentaries leading us from verse to verse?
SHIAISM IS BASED ON TWO FALSE CONCEPTS, FIRST INFALLIBLE IMAMAT (WHICH IS TOTALLY ABSENT IN QURAN MAJEED), SECOND ALI WAS ENEMY OF THREE KHULFAS AND THREE KHULFAS WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. WHEREAS IN FACT, ALI'S THREE SONS NAMES WERE ON THREE KHULFAS, HASSAN'S SON NAME WAS ABU BAKR. NEITHER ALI WAS THEIR ENEMY NOR THEY WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. ALI MARRIED WIDOW OF HIS REAL BROTHER TO ABU BAKR, ALI MARRIED HIS REAL DAUGHTER TO UMAR, ALI SENT HASSAN AND HUSSAIN TO GUARD HOUSE OF USMAN.
Khuda ny 123999 prophets sy kaha Agar tum Muhammad saw ko apana sardar or akhri nabi ju sab sy buland hai nahi manty tu tum sab nabioun ki nabowat bekar hai. now read the ayat came on yum-e-gadeer " aye Rasool saw tumhary parwardigar ki taraf sy ju hukam tumhayain dia gia hai isy pohancha do, agar tum ny aisa nahi kiya tu goiya tum ny koi pegham pohanchaiya hi nahi, our Allah har haal main tum ko logon k shar sy mehfooz rakhy ga (Sorah maida, ayat 67)
Umer & abubakr congrats Ali a.s after this and umer said "aye fazand-e-abutalib aaj sy aap har momin our har momina k Mola ho gaye.. jab log mubarik dy rahy thy mola Ali a.s ko tabhi jabrail aye or kaha "aaj main ny tumhray deen ko har lehaz sy kamil kar diya or tum par apni tmama naymatayin tumam kar di or tumhary liyea deen islam ko chuna (Sahi Muslim j2,P279, swaiq-e-muharqa P41, astiyab J2 P 460, Masnand ahmed bin hanbal J4, P281)
Phir Muhammad saw ny yum-e-gadeer, pehly gawahi li tamama sahaba sy k kiya wo sb mujhy apna mola manty hain, manty hain k main un k nafsoon ka un sy ziada malik hon, sb ney kaha haan Ya Rasool Allah, phir kaha jis jis ka main mola hon us us ka Ali a.s Mola hain. aye Allah ju inhayain dost rakhy unhayin tu dost rakh, ju inhayain dushman rakhy tu un ko dushman rakh.
Umer & abubakr congrats Ali a.s after this and umer said "aye fazand-e-abutalib aaj sy aap har momin our har momina k Mola ho gaye.. jab log mubarik dy rahy thy mola Ali a.s ko tabhi jabrail aye or kaha "aaj main ny tumhray deen ko har lehaz sy kamil kar diya or tum par apni tmama naymatayin tumam kar di or tumhary liyea deen islam ko chuna (Sahi Muslim j2,P279, swaiq-e-muharqa P41, astiyab J2 P 460, Masnand ahmed bin hanbal J4, P281)
SHIAISM IS BASED ON TWO FALSE CONCEPTS, FIRST INFALLIBLE IMAMAT (WHICH IS TOTALLY ABSENT IN QURAN MAJEED), SECOND ALI WAS ENEMY OF THREE KHULFAS AND THREE KHULFAS WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. WHEREAS IN FACT, ALI'S THREE SONS NAMES WERE ON THREE KHULFAS, HASSAN'S SON NAME WAS ABU BAKR. NEITHER ALI WAS THEIR ENEMY NOR THEY WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. ALI MARRIED WIDOW OF HIS REAL BROTHER TO ABU BAKR, ALI MARRIED HIS REAL DAUGHTER TO UMAR, ALI SENT HASSAN AND HUSSAIN TO GUARD HOUSE OF USMAN.
Hasan did not trust these Shia either as they were very disloyal. In his book al-Ihtijâj, the prominent Shia author Abu Mansur at-Tabarsi has preserved the following remark of Hasan:
“By Allah, I think Muawiyyah would be better for me than these people who claim that they are my Shia.” [Abû Mansûr at-Tabarsî, al-Ihtijâj vol. 2 p. 290-291 , Mu’assasat al-A‘lamî, Beirut 1989]
This has been flagged as spam show
SHIAISM IS SUCH A SATANIC FIRQA THAT THERE IS NO EXAMPLE ON EARTH. IN THIS SATANIC FIRQA, ALI IS IMAM AND HORSE IS ALSO IMAM. THESE MUNAFIQEENS DO SIJDA TO GRAVE OF ALI AND ALSO DO SIJDA TO HORSE. THESE MUNAFIQEENS TREAT ALI AND HORSE EQUAL. THESE MUNAFIQEENS CLAIM TO LOVE ALI BUT NEVER ACCEPT ANY SON OF HASAN AS IMAM. THESE MUNAFIQEENS CREATE FUSS ON DEATH OF HUSSAIN BUT NEVER CURSE AND INSULT ABBASID CALIPHS WHO KILLED THEIR SIX IMAMS. EVEN THESE MUNAFIQEENS NEVER DO MATAM FOR HAMZA.
ShiaMunafiq 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALI HAS NO LINK WITH SHIAS AS ESSA HAS NO LINK WITH CHRISTIANS AND MUSA HAS NO LINK WITH JEWS.
SYEDNA ALI HAS RELATIONSHIP OF MARRIAGE WITH THREE KHULFAS AND SHIAS CURSE THREE KHULFAS AND THUS SHIAS INSULT ALI. SHIAS REJECTQURANIC AYATS. TO HIDE THEIR SATANIC BELIEVEE, SHIAS USE NAME OF ALI.
Islam1491 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO SHIA ON EARTH CAN BRING PROOF OF BASE OF SHIAISM I.E. INFALLIBLE IMAMS FROM QURAN MAJEED. NO SHIA ON EARTH CAN REPLY THAT WHY SHIAS DONT ACCEPT ANY SON OF HASSAN AS INFALLIBLE IMAM? WERE SONS OF HASAN NOT PIOUS? WERE THEY NOT FROM AHLE BAIT? HOW IT IS POSSIBLE THAT HUSSAIN'S SON ZAINUL ABDEEN (WHOSE MOTHER SHAHAR BANO WAS A PERSIAN PRINCESS AND SHE HAS NO LINK WITH PROPHET,SAW) IS IMAM. SHIAS CLAIM THAT THEIR IMAMS ARE FROM AHLE BAIT BECOMES WRONG. HUSSAIN HAS PROVED SHIAS ARE LIARS.
Islam1491 5 months ago
i sincerely tried to find the Rwayat he is quoting but i didnt find any thing even near to what he is saying
not even in shia books
so he is absolutely lying and he must be answerable to Allah , Prophet Muhammad sew and Hazrat Ali ra
awaismalik80 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
“O Prophet! Say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.” (Quran, 33:59)
Here, Allah uses the plural word for daughters, not the singular form. Allah uses the term “banaatuka” which means “your daughters.” If it was one daughter only, it would be “bintuka.”
SHIAS REJECT THIS QURANIC AYAT.
MuhammadAhmad1 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
at least Quran tells the most pious and pure souls were ahlebait, who are also leaders of heaven too. hehehheheh.
you should prove ur kalifs as they were better than ahelabit, if u could, can u ? you can never but still will run behind ur fake 3 kalifs, who had ruined the face to true islam by their negligence.
umeru123 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is an open challenge for the Shia to give Quranic verses which outline and justify the Shia concept of Imamah. Can the Shia produce even a single verse outlining Imamah, without any additions to the translation, without parenthetical insertions to the translation, without Hadith to “support” their interpretation, without Tafseer, and without their own personal commentaries leading us from verse to verse?
MuhammadAhmad1 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Aisha's faith in Muhammad savav
Once there was an altercation between the Prophet and Ayesha when they found Abu Bakr as judge. Hazrat Ayesha said to the Prophet: ‘You speak but don't speak except truth. At once Abu Bakr gave her such a slap that blood began to ooze out from her mouth’.
Ihya Ulum-id-din by Imam Ghazzali, Volume 2 page 36,
umeru123 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALI THREE SONS NAMES WERE ABU BAKR, UMAR AND USMAN AND HASAN SON NAME WAS ABU BAKR. ALL SHIA IMAMS DAUGHTERS NAMES ARE AYESHA, WHY ALI AND AALE ALI KEPT THEIR CHILDREN NAMES ON THREE KHULFAS AND UMUL MOMNIN AYESHA? THEY WANT TO SHOW TO THE WORLD THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP WITH SHIANE IBLEES WHO POSE AS "LOVERS" OF AHLE BAIT BUT ARE IN FACT DECEIVERS AND KILLERS OF AHLE BAIT AND TO HIDE THEIR SATANIC ACTS, THESE RIYKARS POSE AS AZADARS.
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
AISHA HERSELF UM-E-SALAMA HER SELF ARE WITNESS WE ARE NOT AHLEBAIT
IS THERE ANY COMPARISON BETWEEN ONE SIDE ABUBAKR, TO WHOME GOD EVEN DID NOT LET PREACH ABOUT ONE SURRAH (BARAAT) AND OTHER SIDE GOD ASKED MUHAMMAD SAW TO TAKE UR SONS, WOMEN, NAFS AGAINST CHRISTIAN. GOD CHOSED THEM FOR HIS DEEN ISLAM.
IS IT STILL HARD TO KNOW WHOME TO FOLLOW?????
BUT MUNAFIQ WILL STILL GO AGAINST GOD. AND WILL SAY I CAN CHOSE BETTER THAN GOD.
umeru123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALLAH SAYS ALL WIVES OF PROPHET,SAW, ARE AHLE BAIT AND MOTHERS OF BELIEVERS, THEY REJECT IT. ALLAH SAYS LAST PROPHET,SAW, HAD DAUGHTERS (PLURAL) THEY REJECT IT , ALLAH SAYS IN SURAH NOOR AYESHA IS INNOCENT, THEY REJECT IT. ALLAH SAYS IN SURAH FATH THAT HE WAS PLEASED WITH BELIEVERS (FOUR KHULFAS AND SAHABAS) WHEN THEY WERE TAKING BAYT UNDER TREE, THEY REJECT IT. ALLAH SAYS BELIEVERS WILL SEE ALLAH ON DOOMSDAY, THEY REJECT IT.
WHO CAN BELIEVE THAT SHIAS BELIEVE IN QURAN MAJEED?
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
USMAN KA TOHEEN-E-RISALAT
MUHAMMAD SAW NY HAKIM OUR US K BETY MARWAN KO SHEHR BADAR KAR DIYA THA JAB K USMAN US KO APNI HAKOMAT MAIN WAPIS LY AYE OUR MARWAN SY APNI BETI KI SHADI BHI KAR DI, PHIR WO BAG-E-FIDAK JU ABUBKAR NY BIBI FATIMA A.S KO JU UN KA HAQ THA NAHI DIYA THA, WO USMAN NY MARWAN KO GIFT KAR DIYA, US MUNAFIQ KO JISY NABI SAW NY SHEHRBADAR KIYA THA.
hobabdabiel 1 year ago
@hobabdabiel ........ Whatever happened in history, it is just history and we still dont know wat had happened in real. We all have to respect Sahaba. Prophet Muhammad said" if you hate my sahaba, it means you hate me (Muhammad), & if you hate me then it means you hate Allah as well. .... So please think and change the mind set.
imdusaf 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is an open challenge for the Shia to give Quranic verses which outline and justify the Shia concept of Imamah. Can the Shia produce even a single verse outlining Imamah, without any additions to the translation, without parenthetical insertions to the translation, without Hadith to “support” their interpretation, without Tafseer, and without their own personal commentaries leading us from verse to verse?
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SHIAISM IS BASED ON TWO FALSE CONCEPTS, FIRST INFALLIBLE IMAMAT (WHICH IS TOTALLY ABSENT IN QURAN MAJEED), SECOND ALI WAS ENEMY OF THREE KHULFAS AND THREE KHULFAS WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. WHEREAS IN FACT, ALI'S THREE SONS NAMES WERE ON THREE KHULFAS, HASSAN'S SON NAME WAS ABU BAKR. NEITHER ALI WAS THEIR ENEMY NOR THEY WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. ALI MARRIED WIDOW OF HIS REAL BROTHER TO ABU BAKR, ALI MARRIED HIS REAL DAUGHTER TO UMAR, ALI SENT HASSAN AND HUSSAIN TO GUARD HOUSE OF USMAN.
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
Khuda ny 123999 prophets sy kaha Agar tum Muhammad saw ko apana sardar or akhri nabi ju sab sy buland hai nahi manty tu tum sab nabioun ki nabowat bekar hai. now read the ayat came on yum-e-gadeer " aye Rasool saw tumhary parwardigar ki taraf sy ju hukam tumhayain dia gia hai isy pohancha do, agar tum ny aisa nahi kiya tu goiya tum ny koi pegham pohanchaiya hi nahi, our Allah har haal main tum ko logon k shar sy mehfooz rakhy ga (Sorah maida, ayat 67)
hobabdabiel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Umer & abubakr congrats Ali a.s after this and umer said "aye fazand-e-abutalib aaj sy aap har momin our har momina k Mola ho gaye.. jab log mubarik dy rahy thy mola Ali a.s ko tabhi jabrail aye or kaha "aaj main ny tumhray deen ko har lehaz sy kamil kar diya or tum par apni tmama naymatayin tumam kar di or tumhary liyea deen islam ko chuna (Sahi Muslim j2,P279, swaiq-e-muharqa P41, astiyab J2 P 460, Masnand ahmed bin hanbal J4, P281)
hobabdabiel 1 year ago
Phir Muhammad saw ny yum-e-gadeer, pehly gawahi li tamama sahaba sy k kiya wo sb mujhy apna mola manty hain, manty hain k main un k nafsoon ka un sy ziada malik hon, sb ney kaha haan Ya Rasool Allah, phir kaha jis jis ka main mola hon us us ka Ali a.s Mola hain. aye Allah ju inhayain dost rakhy unhayin tu dost rakh, ju inhayain dushman rakhy tu un ko dushman rakh.
hobabdabiel 1 year ago
Umer & abubakr congrats Ali a.s after this and umer said "aye fazand-e-abutalib aaj sy aap har momin our har momina k Mola ho gaye.. jab log mubarik dy rahy thy mola Ali a.s ko tabhi jabrail aye or kaha "aaj main ny tumhray deen ko har lehaz sy kamil kar diya or tum par apni tmama naymatayin tumam kar di or tumhary liyea deen islam ko chuna (Sahi Muslim j2,P279, swaiq-e-muharqa P41, astiyab J2 P 460, Masnand ahmed bin hanbal J4, P281)
hobabdabiel 1 year ago
Ali(a.s) haramy imam hain.
muawiya tumhara imam.
20-25 saal k hogy abhi aur 20-30 saal sabur karo, fesila hogae ga kon jannat main ha aur kon JAHANUM main.!!!!!!!!!!!!
razakazmi14 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SHIAISM IS BASED ON TWO FALSE CONCEPTS, FIRST INFALLIBLE IMAMAT (WHICH IS TOTALLY ABSENT IN QURAN MAJEED), SECOND ALI WAS ENEMY OF THREE KHULFAS AND THREE KHULFAS WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. WHEREAS IN FACT, ALI'S THREE SONS NAMES WERE ON THREE KHULFAS, HASSAN'S SON NAME WAS ABU BAKR. NEITHER ALI WAS THEIR ENEMY NOR THEY WERE ENEMIES OF ALI. ALI MARRIED WIDOW OF HIS REAL BROTHER TO ABU BAKR, ALI MARRIED HIS REAL DAUGHTER TO UMAR, ALI SENT HASSAN AND HUSSAIN TO GUARD HOUSE OF USMAN.
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
ZINDABAD FAZIL ALVI
mutasab 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hasan did not trust these Shia either as they were very disloyal. In his book al-Ihtijâj, the prominent Shia author Abu Mansur at-Tabarsi has preserved the following remark of Hasan:
“By Allah, I think Muawiyyah would be better for me than these people who claim that they are my Shia.” [Abû Mansûr at-Tabarsî, al-Ihtijâj vol. 2 p. 290-291 , Mu’assasat al-A‘lamî, Beirut 1989]
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago