Added: 3 years ago
From: calctube
Views: 5,539
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Couldn't you have pluged in f(x) when you had the inverse g(X) at like 2:32 and plug in 3 after that to make it 1/(3(x^3+x+1)+1)? Instead of doing all that math and critical thinking I thought that might be easier but I don't know if you can do that and still get the answer

  • thank you !!! also this vid looks like it was taken in the 70's lol, hmm...when you derivated the inverse with respect to X , why did you end up with 1 divided by the answer.

  • @xSebas6089x You mean around 2:10? Yeah that was REALLY unclear. I just did the algebra quickly. I took the 2nd line:

    1=3y²y' + y', factored out the y' on the right, and then divided.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more