Couldn't you have pluged in f(x) when you had the inverse g(X) at like 2:32 and plug in 3 after that to make it 1/(3(x^3+x+1)+1)? Instead of doing all that math and critical thinking I thought that might be easier but I don't know if you can do that and still get the answer
thank you !!! also this vid looks like it was taken in the 70's lol, hmm...when you derivated the inverse with respect to X , why did you end up with 1 divided by the answer.
Couldn't you have pluged in f(x) when you had the inverse g(X) at like 2:32 and plug in 3 after that to make it 1/(3(x^3+x+1)+1)? Instead of doing all that math and critical thinking I thought that might be easier but I don't know if you can do that and still get the answer
hadd93 9 months ago
thank you !!! also this vid looks like it was taken in the 70's lol, hmm...when you derivated the inverse with respect to X , why did you end up with 1 divided by the answer.
xSebas6089x 2 years ago
@xSebas6089x You mean around 2:10? Yeah that was REALLY unclear. I just did the algebra quickly. I took the 2nd line:
1=3y²y' + y', factored out the y' on the right, and then divided.
calctube 1 year ago