Added: 2 years ago
From: vincidolphin
Views: 14,213
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 當年邊條膠脂會人形豬知道正苦會為的士牌數目封頂叫個老豆大手掃­牌而致富o架....

  • 有無人記得點解譚惠珠做做下點四料議員無得做.我記得當年譚惠珠­比壹仔報道她身為交通諮詢委員會主席

    ,擁有先達的士公司股份。譚惠珠打比邵逸夫要求無記新聞

    部,抽起報導。邵逸夫向港督投訴,港督大怒,好快四料議

    員都無得做。  其實該事件只是導火線,真正的原因是她在中英聯合聲明簽署後逐步­轉軚,因親英變為舔共,故在英方失寵,1991年後不再委任她擔­任重要公職。

  • 譚慧珠你做立法局議員時通過的士牌照立法事件.........­給人揭發了你和的士公司有重大利益衝突.....你还有什麼公信­力可言....揾鬼信你講野..........

  • 功能組別仆街

  • 識背書就食我地市民幾廿萬一個月嫁啦

  • 譚惠珠,我今日要重新認牠了。

  • 阿爷吹鸡,全部跪地!

  • 公投當然是違反基本法啦,因為香港根本沒有公投法.與共產黨講法­,你永遠講不贏它,因為法律是專制政權的統治公具吧了.

  • 公投-冇-違反基本法, 因為香港司法係以普通法原則, 即係法律內冇記載係違法的, 就唔係違法, 而基本法係小憲法, 小憲法冇改變司法原則, 而本港法律根本冇公投法, 亦冇反對公投的法律, 所以係冇違法.

    而小憲法唔係直接管制人民的, 而係作為政府施政同制法的, 所以人民本身係唔可能"違反基本法".

  • @vincidolphin 您好:因為共產黨不可能給人民權利,所以不可能會有公投法給你.­

  • Tse Chi Fung You Are Great

  • just bring those law breaker to justice. how does it sound to you??

  • 總之亞爺就驚人民(以不記名方式)表達其意志

  • 我想問譚小姐.....香港有咩可以做??依樣違憲,果樣違法.­.....

  • 佢嘅意思中国係唔需要人權,因為違反基本法. 而基本法係違反国際人權法.

    明白未!

    中華人民共和係要除去(人民)兩個字,改国號

  • @DT5236

  • @liverpoolreina 拆解"中華人民共和國"謊言--思想非中華(馬克思主義源自德國­),國家沒人民(在共產黨下只有奴棣,沒人民),政體不共和(依­然其一黨專政,卻向外謊稱"民主集中制")

  • 基本法並非中央政府對香港統治模式的指示, 而是中央政府和香港市民的契約

  • 謝志豐越戰越勇~ 讚~

  • There is no such thing as a 香港公民, but only 香港市民 and 中國公民!! If there is no 香港公民, how can 公投(公民投票) be legitimate constitutionally !?

    The use of the word referendum (公投) in this campaign was a dangerous choice of word ... 毓民 was clever, his original slogan 五區總辭,變相公投 was good, the word 變相(de-facto) was a clever choice. I ask, Who was that idiot that removed the word from the slogan !!

  • you ar erigth, as i think that the "de-facto" is important and clear to describe the way this movement goes. but civil party did ask that the 5 district resign isn't good and complicated, then lsd negotiate to change slogan.

  • 香港公民, 香港市民, 五區總辭,變相公投 or 公投 whatever you want to call is not the question. freedom of expression is guaranteed by the law (under the constitution) and that is given and nobody can take it away.

    people's council, the governing body can interpret laws in whatever way they want and that is not unprecedented. relax, in a democratic free world, law breakers will be charged and prosecuted so it appears that no law (and basic laws) has been violated.

  • @lostpebble admirable english...

  • 基本法都無講譚惠珠可以做中共走狗,妳又走去做!典型港奸!

  • 其实中央如此的跳出来大声呼喊违宪,已经令其本身失分不小,但是­中央有着更大的顾虑就是真的让泛民选赢,他那时更难说话,失分更­多,所以他要走这部棋。公投是中共的一个死穴,所以他强烈反对台­湾公投。

  • 而家係辭職做成公投事實,並唔係真正政府或議會憲制權入面o既公­投,點會違反基本法?

    唔通辭職做成公投事實係違法? 咁分別5區有議員辭職就已經違法

    或是講「公投」係違法?

    d理由簡直荒謬

  • good point, POWER TO THE PEOPLE

  • 100% with what you said, look back 25 or 30 yrs ago, she was not looked the same as she was with British HK Government at that time.

  • 譚女士的面目十足共產黨的精神面貌 !

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more