This video is a fail on so many levels, I'm not even going to go into it. Just realize if you want to scoop on evolution read a book on DNA, so will soon realize that evolution never happened.
ya but that is an evolution fantasy. What evolved to create our flying animals that we have today. When you find out what animal did what to evolve into what then you have something. Until then good luck trying to figure out how gigantic dinosaur wings evolved lol.
yep, to trick us into going to hell, in fact they should have a sims game like this, you're god, and your objective is to trick people into not believing in you so that they'll go to hell.
As Michael Behe pointed out, just because you can visualize a change in your mind doesn't mean that it is actually possible. For all we know, each of those "micro evolutionary" changes might require changes to several dozen different proteins simultaneously. It is easy to oversimplify living things and say things like "the skin flap could then extend out to the fingers," but I would propose that such a change would itself require dozens of mutations all coincidentally with a common goal.
Oh gosh, not actually possible? Some extra skin doesn't require dozens of new proteins to be functional, it is just a slight change in appearance. If you do not believe evolution can change appearance, you should have a good explanation of where dog breeds come from.
You can be absolutely sure that if you capture 100 flying squirrels and measure the size of their skin between their legs, some will have more, some less. It is undeniable.
I'm not sure your background in Biology, but in my experience things tend to be more complex than they appear. There may well be a dozen genes in flying squirrels that affect the skin between their legs by affecting protein concentrations or hormone levels. But I feel that no one of them would make the skin advantageous without the others.
When I was a kid I used to try to strap things to my arms to make me fly, but it takes more than wings to make something fly, an animal must be built for it.
Inevitably some squirrels will have more skin, some less. If the ones with more can glide for longer and increase their chances for reproduction, they will be selected for. Some will be stronger as well, whether you like it or not. This is what evolution is about, natural selection acting on variance. Over time the increments accumulate.
But that is the same logic that says that a fly with 4 wings is better than one with two. But 4 winged flies cannot fly because the wings are not functional. They lack the necessary components to use the wings.
Variations are limited based upon the available genetic information. Mutations can extend that variability but have never been shown to create new useful information.
Plus if that were true, then we should see lots of almost-flying squirrels. But we don't see any half-formed skin flaps.
So squirrels having more skin between their arms and legs giving them the ability to glide for longer distances isn't advantageous?
Come on, no new useful mutations? How about nylonase? How about the fact that some humans have four different cone cells in the eye? How else do scientists evolve new enzymes in the lab?
We see lots of almost-flying squirrels. Some can even glide for 75 meters.
There is people who actualy believe this crazy stuff , LMAO !
MrCobra811 2 months ago
This video is a fail on so many levels, I'm not even going to go into it. Just realize if you want to scoop on evolution read a book on DNA, so will soon realize that evolution never happened.
RespectMyHate 8 months ago
ya but that is an evolution fantasy. What evolved to create our flying animals that we have today. When you find out what animal did what to evolve into what then you have something. Until then good luck trying to figure out how gigantic dinosaur wings evolved lol.
Chase9803 1 year ago
this is wrong, squirrels are mammals bats are birds, the bible said so
scottbaioisdead 2 years ago
No rats became bats, the story says so
Gimli4theWest 2 years ago
what story is this? rats are rodents, bats are related to to anteaters, pangolins, whales and ungulates no rodents
scottbaioisdead 2 years ago
laurasiatheria actually, now is the story true?
Gimli4theWest 2 years ago
You guys have become the greatest story tellers of our age. You put to shame religious story tellers of old.
Gimli4theWest 2 years ago
this shit is SOOOOO FUCKING BORING.......ALL I SAW WAS A FUCKING RETARD SQURILL GETTING FAT AND SOME HOW BECAME A BAT
darkkristian22 2 years ago
I agree with smitty. God probably just made seals, gliding squirrels, and mudd skippers to mislead us into believing such transitions actually occur.
adkinsjr 2 years ago
yep, to trick us into going to hell, in fact they should have a sims game like this, you're god, and your objective is to trick people into not believing in you so that they'll go to hell.
luke666808g 2 years ago
As Michael Behe pointed out, just because you can visualize a change in your mind doesn't mean that it is actually possible. For all we know, each of those "micro evolutionary" changes might require changes to several dozen different proteins simultaneously. It is easy to oversimplify living things and say things like "the skin flap could then extend out to the fingers," but I would propose that such a change would itself require dozens of mutations all coincidentally with a common goal.
smitty0521 2 years ago
Oh gosh, not actually possible? Some extra skin doesn't require dozens of new proteins to be functional, it is just a slight change in appearance. If you do not believe evolution can change appearance, you should have a good explanation of where dog breeds come from.
You can be absolutely sure that if you capture 100 flying squirrels and measure the size of their skin between their legs, some will have more, some less. It is undeniable.
antipul446 2 years ago 4
I'm not sure your background in Biology, but in my experience things tend to be more complex than they appear. There may well be a dozen genes in flying squirrels that affect the skin between their legs by affecting protein concentrations or hormone levels. But I feel that no one of them would make the skin advantageous without the others.
When I was a kid I used to try to strap things to my arms to make me fly, but it takes more than wings to make something fly, an animal must be built for it.
smitty0521 2 years ago
Inevitably some squirrels will have more skin, some less. If the ones with more can glide for longer and increase their chances for reproduction, they will be selected for. Some will be stronger as well, whether you like it or not. This is what evolution is about, natural selection acting on variance. Over time the increments accumulate.
antipul446 2 years ago 4
But that is the same logic that says that a fly with 4 wings is better than one with two. But 4 winged flies cannot fly because the wings are not functional. They lack the necessary components to use the wings.
Variations are limited based upon the available genetic information. Mutations can extend that variability but have never been shown to create new useful information.
Plus if that were true, then we should see lots of almost-flying squirrels. But we don't see any half-formed skin flaps.
smitty0521 2 years ago
So squirrels having more skin between their arms and legs giving them the ability to glide for longer distances isn't advantageous?
Come on, no new useful mutations? How about nylonase? How about the fact that some humans have four different cone cells in the eye? How else do scientists evolve new enzymes in the lab?
We see lots of almost-flying squirrels. Some can even glide for 75 meters.
antipul446 2 years ago
your welcome
Prontest 2 years ago
very good
Prontest 2 years ago
thanks
deadman1144 2 years ago