I would not want a Multi-touch screen on an iMac. I have played with the HP before and it gets old after about 5 mins. Plus you computer screen always looks dirty.
IMO Multi-touch is a gimmick. HP does not make a system that comes close to the iMac.
I'm not sure if you even need a multi-touch screen, it can be done with peripherals like mouses or track pads.
blacksteel25 2 years ago
Apple should have an Multi-touch option regardless.
vwbond 2 years ago
Why? Besides, Apple has never been one to buy into fads.
dragonballjiujitsu 2 years ago
So the multi-touch is a fad-LOL. If that's the case why does the iphone, ipod use it? Multi-touch isn't a fad are you serious.
vwbond 2 years ago
When it comes to the desktop computer screen, yes, its very much a useless fad.
dragonballjiujitsu 2 years ago
We both know they should have it as an option, but they just don't.
vwbond 2 years ago
@vwbond
I disagree. I think Apple needs to keep doing what they have always done and be innovative and not try to have what everyone else is doing.
dragonballjiujitsu 2 years ago
I would not want a Multi-touch screen on an iMac. I have played with the HP before and it gets old after about 5 mins. Plus you computer screen always looks dirty.
IMO Multi-touch is a gimmick. HP does not make a system that comes close to the iMac.
dragonballjiujitsu 2 years ago