House of Wax 3D - 1953 - Paddle Ball

[paisleystreet]

3d sucks.

[dahron65]

It is not 3d

[LRBScarecrow]

The better House of Wax...the remake was booty.

[eggertstwart]

So gimmicky lol

[shayner67681]

that guy is good at paddle ball!

[horaciosi]

How did he knew that i was eating popcorn?

[worm5776]

Is this Randy Brown and did he change his name from Reggie Rymal .Can a relative answer this for me

[mikemcgee]

where did you get the 3d version of house of wax?

[dltanner99]

Horror novel see video book trailer

[MrKilroy138]

He just broke the 4th wall.

[OmegaWeaponFFVIII]

Good clip.

[crmfghtr]

This is something lost in cinema today it was about fun!

[JoshSitar]

The guy with the paddle was annoying as shit.

[dationnation]

@JoshSitar if you don't know 'the guy with the paddles name' then you my friend are a true lagit member of the new ''Retardation Nation''. You got Generation X, baby boomers, so these kids these days need a name.. I think Generation Retardation fits. :)

[JoshSitar]

@dationnation I'm definitely not a "lagit" member of that. I know of what you're referring, and it IS a tremendous problem, but I'm not one. For one thing, if I was part of that group, I wouldn't even be watching an old 3D video or researching this stuff. I'm certain I could reference many things of which you are unaware also. And the guy with the paddle is so tremendously annoying, that he doesn't deserve to be called by his proper name.

[jesusgot8ten]

Im using green for left and purple for right and it doesn't work :L

[Carthsting]

I would like to stab him with that paddle.

[Johnlindsey289]

If you have the Blu-Ray or DVD of the new My Bloody Valentine 3D then get those glasses out and use them.

[angstmonkey1]

That was great to watch, i'll have to junt down this entire film, tho i think my brain will hate me for it :p

[cmMerlin]

CHECK OUT THE NEWER STEREOSCOPIC UPDATED VERSION! It uses the new YouTube3D controls for many 3D viewing methods.

[charel196]

red on the left/green on the right...3D works fine with proper glasses and wearing them correctly. Yes this scene is on the regular non 3D DVD

[countesspoppie]

is it because im missing a 3d compatible screen that im not seeing this in 3d even though i've got the glasses?

[Geordielassy]

I know its the House of Wax 1953 - I'm trying to find out if the standard version of House of Wax 1953 (non 3D version of same movie) has this scene in it.

Thanks  xx

[HerzogOrgrim]

@Geordielassy I´ve just seen the standard version and I can guarantee you that it has this scene in it.

[cmMerlin]

@HerzogOrgrim Yes, indeed it does.

[Geordielassy]

Can anyone help me?  I need to find out if the paddle ball scene also features in the standad House of Wax version? Any of you film Gurus know the answer?

Thanks xx

[Basie369]

This the house of wax from 1953

[kewlkat8208]

i wish that i had 3d glasses to watch that. i saw it in my Film and Literature class back in high school.

[dodge96neon]

this gets publicity due to 3d but this guy is great with the paddle balls. he has wonderful eye hand coordination

[SteeleyeSpan2]

House of Wax was not one of the first 3D films in cinema history.

And it didn't have "distorted" colours in the theatres because it used polarised glasses rather than red/blue.

Polarised 3D had problems - it needed a different screen than most standard theatres had, and, since the glasses used linear polarisation, if you tilted your head to one side or the other, you got cross-bleed of the images.

(Current 3D uses circular polarisation to avoid that problem.)

[SteeleyeSpan2]

Also, the original process used two synchronised projectors, and if they were even half a frame off synch, people got headaches.

The red-blue process can use a single strip of film for a B&W image, so it was cheaper and easier than the polarisation one.

[Rapscallion4]

It was Warner Bro's first 3D movie though

[tomkes100]

great film on its own but silly bit as us well known . im a horror film historian and i love this old film. it stands on its own merits. TOMK

[harlequinpinstripe]

This guy is my Grandpa Reg :]

Sadly, he's passed away now :[

[hemming57]

@harlequinpinstripe I've always wanted to know about him. What can you tell me?

[comedypods]

did'nt work 4 me

[TheDeadDeadsons]

my 3d glasses didnt work. mabey i need to find some of those red and blue ones.

[NabloProductions]

It got in my mouth! I should have listened when he told me to close my mouth while eating popcorn. I couldn't help it, it's extra butter!

[Redhotice54]

Extra butter FTW, i flinched when the ball first came forward lol

[HorrorMovieThemes31]

Amazing, almost like it was made for 3-D, but back in 1953, they didnt have the 3-D technology right?

[MVEProducties]

Of course they did. 3D is almost as old as photography itself.

[HorrorMovieThemes31]

Really? I figured it came out in the 80s.

[sammycut1]

Nope. It was the 50's, but it fazed out then came back briefly in the 80's. It seems to skip in and out of popularity. The 80's wasn't much different that the 50's, but we've come a LONG way since then. No more color distortion.

[JCTFilms]

House of Wax was one of the 1st 3D films in cinema history.

[latty95]

yes they did

[scotpens]

@HorrorMovieThemes31 Ever hear of the stereopticon? It was a device for looking at 3-D photgraphs that dates back to the mid-19th century. Experimental 3-D movies were made as early as 1915.

[HipHopJun]

Lol funny the way he hits the ball, looks like he's spanking someone.

[deadrising77]

LOL

[sponderman]

mega LOL

[wivel]

This is very good 3-D

[GeorgeDeadsonTV]

well.... that was, RANDOM! XD

[masterofzelda]

Bloody brilliant seen, overcleary its an movie made for the big screens =)

[JohnKoroly]

This is even funnier that the "Dr. Tounge's 3-D House of Pancakes" bit on SCTV!

[piecesofrainbow3]

Awesome

[MrDefaulto]

Haha this is cool to see in 3-D.

The thing is, this was not done in the crummy red & blue style 3-D but was full color in real 3-D, like Meet the Robinsons or Bolt. I saw it when it was re-released in the 80's. They showed it in red & blue on tv because the other version doesn't work (yet).

Cant wait 'til real 3-D comes to tv!!

[MrDefaulto]

@PoisonedV

Wow, who's the moron? You obviously don't know sh*t. It's not REAL-D , that's just a trademark for today's 3-D. They had OTHER versions of this in the 50's MORON. Ever heard of CAPTAIN E-O at disneyland? In the 80's? Also in realistic 3-D. Man you are a stupid piece of sh*t. Get informed before you put someone else down. They are working on real 3-D for television now that TVs have a specific pixel size and shape and can be controlled. You need to shut your ignorant mouth.

[PoisonedV]

umad

[sammycut1]

This was done back in the 50's when all they had was Red and Blue, even in theaters. The new 3D they use now is very technically superior and relatively new. I did not exist in the 50s.

[rmager3571]

Sammycut I hate to break it to you the House of Wax used Stereoscopic 3-D . which is much more superior of an effect than the red & cyan anaglyph 3-D!

[Jarren95]

actually, its the same thing. :P. SteroScopic and Anaglypic are the same, but the names are different now!

These days we have those REalD 3d movies, in which the color stays same. Very good. :) But I miss the old red n' blue!

[sammycut1]

Steroescopic is red and cyan (blue).

[scotpens]

@sammycut1 No, what you're describing is anaglyphic 3-D. "Stereoscopic" can refer to ANY 3-D process. It simply means three-dimensional (literally, "solid vision").

[scotpens]

@sammycut1 No, "House of Wax" didn't use the red-blue (anaglyph) system. All the 3-D movies made during the 3-D craze of the 1950s used polarized filters and polarized glasses.

[Rlotpir1972]

@MrDefaulto Sony and Panasonic had got their REAL 3-D TV's available now....if you could afford it. They average around $2,500-$4,000 depending on the size and make. You also need a 3-D blue-ray DVD player and special 3-D glasses in addition. Within the next two decades, all TV and cable networks will resort to that technology.

[xdeliriumgirlx]

i love how RIGHT after this bit, vicent comes out and outright apologized for how corny that was

"sorry, but he does draw a crowd"

[animesen4]

pura mierda, perdi 49 minutos viendo esta mierda y yo que pense que iba a ser dibertido T_T

[ItalianWesternReview]

How exactly did you waste 49 minutes of your life watching this when the video is only 39 seconds long?

[animesen4]

tambien gaste tiempo en que cargara a eso se le suma tiempo

[ItalianWesternReview]

I understand long loading times but it took 45 minutes to load?!

[animesen4]

weon que cai mal no teni vida!!

[Jotex]

pendeja de mierda ignorante, El video dura 39 segundos, porque 49 minutos?, saco de mierda.

Como que se demora en cargar 49 min, estas muy loca.

[Jotex]

ajajajja q weona mas imbecil como que 49 min? jajaja Tu internet es una mierda entonces.

[animesen4]

pero yo no me llevo lechendo los comentarios que salen en un video para griticar a la gente esta wea deveria acerla en o la que subio el video weon

[Perranporth]

Love that scene - it was so blatantly shoehorned into the plot!

[scotpens]

@Perranporth It's an obvious gimmick to exploit the 3-D process, but outside of this scene, the film is surprisingly restrained in its use of 3-D. The only other self-conscious gimmick shot I can recall is a fistfight scene with a punch thrown directly at the camera.

[mojacherox]

lol 6 seconds into it!

[bennjr]

How did you find a 3-D printo fo this gem?

[guitarfreak127]

Sweet :)

[josgamer]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH IT CAME IN MY EYE!

[wingtipvortex]

cool.

[wingtipvortex]

I have this in lcd shutterglass 3d, it looks great. No ghosting and true 3d effects. Shutterglass decoder=$60 dvd=$25 I have collected many 3d films in this format, Jaws 3d, Friday the 13th, Dial M for Murder, Metalstorm, Parasite and the list goes on. All freely available to buy from ebay.

[myPETsnailFRED]

lmfao that was awsome

[modhybrid002]

There's House of Wax 2005, and it's sooo.... =.=

[Mountcastle73]

House of Wax is my favorite old school horror movie. I saw it first on Chiller Theater when I was kid. I would love to see the whole thing in 3D.

[scotpens]

This picture was a remake of 1933's "The Mystery of the Wax Museum," the last major studio movie made in 2-strip Technicolor, directed by Michael Curtiz and starring Lionel Atwill and Fay Wray.

The 3-D "House of Wax" was directed by Andre de Toth -- who had only one eye! Seems a bit like hiring a tone-deaf piano tuner.

[sakara18235]

...i just saw the 70s movie poster for this re-release on internet.(...and the guy here is the father of david cassidy, of the partrige family)

[bennjr]

No he's not, Jack Cassidy (David's Father) didn't start acting until 1957, while this movie was made in 1953.

[sakara18235]

this was re-released in 70s, in 3-d. i saw it at typical shopping mall movie theater.

[jeanniedee]

This is the old 2 colour glasses ,(Headache for 1 week after), Later films used a clear glass polarising system .(headache for 1 day after). Actually have seen House of Wax in the polarising system . It was Fab !!

[luke1to2]

Actully the polirizing method of 3-d was the origanl method but when all the the 3d classics got re-released in the 70s-80s they swicthed to the blue and red version

[chobrocoli]

There's no guarantee for it giving you a headache, it depends on who you are and how often you use anaglyph glasses

[misconduckt]

it only really works on the big screen, i've never seen anything on a tv or smaller that works, i'd love to see this in a theater

[kingkremlingrool]

where can I find 3D glasses nowadays anyway?

[scifiradioguy]

I hear a guy in Melonville named Count Floyd has a few pallets of them in a storage place somewhere.

[NothingDoingChief]

If you buy the Friday the 13th box set, it comes with two pairs! Or you can go to pretty much any retro vintage store and pick up those big goggle ones.

[diaperbiscuits2]

The music is nice.

[Leanne60]

Fairly grisly movie for its time, as so many were back then. Vincent Price, and that awesome voice of his. Nobody can recite poetry like him. Great movie with Vincent Price at his usual diabolical best. Evidently I have the wrong kind of 3D glasses, nothing jumped off the page for me.

[djstickland]

It's about time Warner released House of Wax on 3D DVD with two sets of glasses

[superjooo]

ausome

so good, the ball comes right at u

i thought it was going to go out onto the page

[KKD1247]

STILL one of the best 3D scenes ever filmed!

[prtactor]

wish there were more 3d clips online with the red and blue glasses from the 50s

[baddog7676]

This movie is incredible. Vincent Price is a legend!

I love the older horror flicks from the 1950's and 1960's

[alecton]

dude!!!!! how did you get this?

[michaeljayklein]

I remember my dad taking us to see this when it was re-released, in wide screen and stereo sound. They used the polaroid method for this outing and I STILL can remember everyone in the audience ducking during this scene. Best 3D I've ever seen.

[chavs53]

how i get 3d glasses

[erpollo15]

i have 3d glasses! cool!

[tylerguy123]

on second thought i take that back (sorry but i wanst paying attention )

[tylerguy123]

well as a pro. 3-d critic i would say the definition (aka the effect) was a bit low

[veki55]

i haVE 3D GLASSES SO FUN 5 STRAS!

[mrspongiepants]

HHAHAHAHHAha this look´s kool i want more 3D videos

[ghoulgrl]

Thanks! I actually have a pair of 3-D glasses. FUN!!!

[migturrodrgz]

nice effect!!, i make myself glasses anaglyph 8D

[cmMerlin]

Yes, you need red/cyan(blue) glasses to see 3D.

This is a small clip from a very old movie. He is presenting the 3D House Of Wax Horror.