Omnipotent should be a word in violation of the constitution. God is within and God is LOVE, and God is as best revered in these manners.
Rejoice in lame OR lamen terms.
ID is the most premiscuous injection of thought since the beginning of time.
I would be appaulled that the Christian institutions I attended would ever commit itself to such indignity than to un-politicize OR confuse nature and nurture.
If you wish to look for support in the centre of music in the world known as EDM community, you will never have the solace you seek among us trolls. We beseech you all from the art and science world. We are the most fowl mouthed trolls of all the internets. and yes, you are speaking with a fellow Christian. Evangelists on the other hand, like those of many, should be neglected.
make sense to yourselves that you all corrupt freedom of speech and censorship.
you pandering dweebs meandering of inconsistency should do more with your your time than over-proportionating the value of "I", to include a special value in schools. sick and twisted behemoths of rankor. When something is that rank, as in value of B.$. someone is and knowing how to make money and corrupt the contingency of a constitution you fowl mouthed-positive quakaholics.
ID books are not scientific. They are nonsense. ID proponents never do lab work, research or contribute to the scientific community because they have NOTHING to offer.
This was quite possibly the lamest, softest "smack in the face" you could possibly deal to I.D. Who are you trying to appeal to, all those 7yr-olds who've studied evolution? Grow some balls and find some funny, stupid.
Thank you for the positive and encouraging comment. I suppose in making this I was appealing to the good folks that nominated this for an EMMY. Keep up the positive reinforcement and lighthearted sense of humor.
Funny video. Of Panda's and People didn't sell as well as the Templeton Institute was hoping it would. I hope they printed millions of copies of the book and when the courts said NO, they lost their ass.
Who am I kidding. They would have made their money back the following Sunday.
this is theworst B.S. i have ever heard. If the gentleman beneath would check up his theories he would find that a lot of scientists think that the evolutionTHEORY shouldn´t even get to be called a scientific THEORY, because of all the holes in it that no scientist in the world can explain. and it´s quite funny that those who speaks for Evolution don´t even dare to debate with someone who speaks for Intelligent design or creationism...people are scared of creationism, because of its consequenses
Really? Who are these "lot of scientists?" Where can we find them? And no scientist can explain it? Then why is evolution so overwhelmingly supported by the world wide scientific community. Why do academic organizations around the globe issue statements supporting evolution education and condeming creationism?
This is what I dont get you come out throw some abstract and unproven "facts" about then they say "HA! Prove me wrong!". We do and you just dont listen.
'people are scared of creationism, because of its consequenses '
actually yes i am, if it is taught you will see a very negative result in human intellegence and our civillisation, our entire civillisation is built on the scientific method, if we teach somthing that isnt reached by the scientific method our soceties will crumble, you may not see it as muc, its like poking a small hole into a large ship, it may not seem much, but given time it will sink unless plugged up (i know crap analogy)
Reading comments i noticed that creationists sound rather childish and less educated than those arguing against them. Creationists use biblical fables, simple, abstract concepts of love and very low level baseless claims (like the comment below mine) and get responses that they probably cannot comprehend, supported by logic, scientific theories and big words.
Yes, if you left it at superficial similarity. However, if you look at the deepest structures of animals and humans, into the very genetic structures, the "common creator" just doesn't cut it anymore; there are features and details abound that can only be explained by common descent. Indeed one can reconstruct the family tree of life from that detail, and make innumerable PRECISE predictions as to what one should be able to find in genomes we have yet to study,...
God can do whatever the hell he wants, he's omnipotent. You can't know that creationism is wrong, he could have created the earth exactly as it was last thursday, with everybody's memories already in their brains. It is impossible to disprove creationist ideas, and thus they aren't science, and I find them so unlikely I don't take them on faith either, I just ignore them.
One could easily say that "animals have similar traits as humans", because we all live on the same planet. This is probably a more logical statement because it doesn't call on unobservable phenomenon. Occam's razor would agree with this since calling a creator into the picture is creating a more complex situation that has facets that can't be proven. I was always told God made us separate, special and different than animals; so where would the similarities come?
i am not saying that some humans don't go and have sex with someone they don't love but what i am saying is that evolution begs the question: "where did love come in place?" not only that but why, if evolution talks about the specie with the best traits is the one that survives, we help others humans who are weak, starving to death,ect? does that not weaken our specie? what about the other species? we tend to help them too. specially the endangered ones.isn't that threatening to our specie?
to be honest evolution sounds real logical,but it does not explain where love comes in place. that affection we humans feel toward a specific person. yes one may say that it is how the specie reproduces, but other species seem to reproduce without the attachment a human tends to feel.
on the contrary, all of our emotions are well explained by evolution, think about marriage and having children, we really don't need to reproduce when we have an ample population, yet within us it's almost impossible to deny the instinct to reproduce. :)
"The THEORY of Evilution is UNPROVED and UNPROVEABLE WE BELIEVE IT ' ONLY ' BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS SPECIAL CREATION...." Quote from Sir Arthur Keith ; Author of the Foreword for the book "Origin of Species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of ' FAVORED RACES' " by Charles Darwin (100th Edition). Turn or Burn!
That is actually supposition. For macro evolution to be true, according to Darwin, there must be evidence provided by fossils showing transitional states. There are none. That we could imagine that one thing stems from another is not proof. If you believe macro evolution you believe it on FAITH alone, not proof.
Fossils are very rare, dead organisms only can become fossils under certain and rare conditions, we can expect some gaps in the fossile record, they don´t disprove the theory of evolution at all. Critics of evolution often cite this argument as being a convenient way to explain the lack of 'snapshot' fossils that show crucial steps between species. However, progressing research and discovery are managing to fill in gaps.
tzephon, it's time to crawl from beneath your rock MANY transitional form have been discovered.
And seperate from the fossilrecord, DNA and retroviral-dna certainly proof it.
Seeing it happen in front of our eyes is the only thing that's missing, but i'll take archeological evidence over theological nonsense anytime so don't take my word for it, grab a shovel and see for yourself.
Can I get a witness?
marasu66 1 year ago
How's that for a mind bender, I R stumped everyone
lokivonloka 3 years ago
Creative Destruction = Energy of Capitalism
lokivonloka 3 years ago
Define Paranoiac = Passive in the instantaneous of delirious material.
lokivonloka 3 years ago
Vote Ron Paul for the constitution. I would if I were American... Thank God I'm not American, that I trust myself having to make those decisions.
Evangelists favorite prayer is for more money, so that more money can be funneled for the purchase of hot-tubs for baptisms...
It's like nepotism tribal rituals of the third kind with those people.
Repackage, consume.
lokivonloka 3 years ago
nurture and nature is a symposium.
God gave us faith and reason, and money making music videos is some biased iconoclastic crock, like of unheard of lameness.
pun intended.
lokivonloka 3 years ago
god gave us all semen to spread it out over his land!
JakeBartlam 2 years ago
God = omnipotent, like a crusty birth canal.
Omnipotent should be a word in violation of the constitution. God is within and God is LOVE, and God is as best revered in these manners.
Rejoice in lame OR lamen terms.
ID is the most premiscuous injection of thought since the beginning of time.
I would be appaulled that the Christian institutions I attended would ever commit itself to such indignity than to un-politicize OR confuse nature and nurture.
lokivonloka 3 years ago
If you wish to look for support in the centre of music in the world known as EDM community, you will never have the solace you seek among us trolls. We beseech you all from the art and science world. We are the most fowl mouthed trolls of all the internets. and yes, you are speaking with a fellow Christian. Evangelists on the other hand, like those of many, should be neglected.
make sense to yourselves that you all corrupt freedom of speech and censorship.
lokivonloka 3 years ago
Comment removed
lokivonloka 3 years ago
clowns, nuns and choir boys
lokivonloka 3 years ago
you pandering dweebs meandering of inconsistency should do more with your your time than over-proportionating the value of "I", to include a special value in schools. sick and twisted behemoths of rankor. When something is that rank, as in value of B.$. someone is and knowing how to make money and corrupt the contingency of a constitution you fowl mouthed-positive quakaholics.
lokivonloka 3 years ago
Comment removed
lokivonloka 3 years ago
Comment removed
lokivonloka 3 years ago
Epic win!
WOMCProductions 3 years ago
Thank you!
blightproductions 3 years ago
Cute.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
Thanks.
blightproductions 3 years ago
They broke the mold.
marasu66 3 years ago
This is absurd. You obviously have not read a single book from the ID movement. If you are going to criticize something at least do it fairly.
danjoeblue 3 years ago
Good to see that you have such a healthy sense of humor and know when not to take something so seriously.
blightproductions 3 years ago 2
ID books are not scientific. They are nonsense. ID proponents never do lab work, research or contribute to the scientific community because they have NOTHING to offer.
Jeremyguru 3 years ago
You have six because you are the most awesome producer ever. My hero!
blightproductions 3 years ago
This was quite possibly the lamest, softest "smack in the face" you could possibly deal to I.D. Who are you trying to appeal to, all those 7yr-olds who've studied evolution? Grow some balls and find some funny, stupid.
perlberg 3 years ago
Thank you for the positive and encouraging comment. I suppose in making this I was appealing to the good folks that nominated this for an EMMY. Keep up the positive reinforcement and lighthearted sense of humor.
blightproductions 3 years ago
Hey no problem. Congrats on the Emmy... local Emmy, right? Yea I have like, six.
perlberg 3 years ago
And I love all the amazing videos you have posted here on Youtube.
blightproductions 3 years ago
Funny video. Of Panda's and People didn't sell as well as the Templeton Institute was hoping it would. I hope they printed millions of copies of the book and when the courts said NO, they lost their ass.
Who am I kidding. They would have made their money back the following Sunday.
USMarineSgt 3 years ago
so creationism/ID is a bullet-proof theory?
Jeebok 3 years ago
"so creationism/ID is a bullet-proof theory?"
More like bullet ridden!
rocas511 3 years ago 8
this is theworst B.S. i have ever heard. If the gentleman beneath would check up his theories he would find that a lot of scientists think that the evolutionTHEORY shouldn´t even get to be called a scientific THEORY, because of all the holes in it that no scientist in the world can explain. and it´s quite funny that those who speaks for Evolution don´t even dare to debate with someone who speaks for Intelligent design or creationism...people are scared of creationism, because of its consequenses
gustafbystrom 3 years ago
Really? Who are these "lot of scientists?" Where can we find them? And no scientist can explain it? Then why is evolution so overwhelmingly supported by the world wide scientific community. Why do academic organizations around the globe issue statements supporting evolution education and condeming creationism?
rocas511 3 years ago 2
99% of scientists accept the fact and theory of evolution. Those same scientists think that ID is garbage. Refute that.
malcolmeat 3 years ago 3
This is what I dont get you come out throw some abstract and unproven "facts" about then they say "HA! Prove me wrong!". We do and you just dont listen.
EricEisenmenger 3 years ago
No answer eh? I didn't think so.
rocas511 3 years ago
'people are scared of creationism, because of its consequenses '
actually yes i am, if it is taught you will see a very negative result in human intellegence and our civillisation, our entire civillisation is built on the scientific method, if we teach somthing that isnt reached by the scientific method our soceties will crumble, you may not see it as muc, its like poking a small hole into a large ship, it may not seem much, but given time it will sink unless plugged up (i know crap analogy)
Erech01 3 years ago 2
you obviously have no idea what you're talking about
elliottcooke 3 years ago
Reading comments i noticed that creationists sound rather childish and less educated than those arguing against them. Creationists use biblical fables, simple, abstract concepts of love and very low level baseless claims (like the comment below mine) and get responses that they probably cannot comprehend, supported by logic, scientific theories and big words.
mrmikeperson 4 years ago 3
"animals have similar traits as humans", could it be logical to say that we have SIMILAR traits because we come from the SAME creator?
vision4DaY 4 years ago
Yes, if you left it at superficial similarity. However, if you look at the deepest structures of animals and humans, into the very genetic structures, the "common creator" just doesn't cut it anymore; there are features and details abound that can only be explained by common descent. Indeed one can reconstruct the family tree of life from that detail, and make innumerable PRECISE predictions as to what one should be able to find in genomes we have yet to study,...
MightyTiny 4 years ago 4
God can do whatever the hell he wants, he's omnipotent. You can't know that creationism is wrong, he could have created the earth exactly as it was last thursday, with everybody's memories already in their brains. It is impossible to disprove creationist ideas, and thus they aren't science, and I find them so unlikely I don't take them on faith either, I just ignore them.
balderdash707 4 years ago
One could easily say that "animals have similar traits as humans", because we all live on the same planet. This is probably a more logical statement because it doesn't call on unobservable phenomenon. Occam's razor would agree with this since calling a creator into the picture is creating a more complex situation that has facets that can't be proven. I was always told God made us separate, special and different than animals; so where would the similarities come?
paleosmoker 4 years ago
i am not saying that some humans don't go and have sex with someone they don't love but what i am saying is that evolution begs the question: "where did love come in place?" not only that but why, if evolution talks about the specie with the best traits is the one that survives, we help others humans who are weak, starving to death,ect? does that not weaken our specie? what about the other species? we tend to help them too. specially the endangered ones.isn't that threatening to our specie?
vision4DaY 4 years ago
to be honest evolution sounds real logical,but it does not explain where love comes in place. that affection we humans feel toward a specific person. yes one may say that it is how the specie reproduces, but other species seem to reproduce without the attachment a human tends to feel.
vision4DaY 4 years ago
on the contrary, all of our emotions are well explained by evolution, think about marriage and having children, we really don't need to reproduce when we have an ample population, yet within us it's almost impossible to deny the instinct to reproduce. :)
OHFUFI 4 years ago 3
human emotions are rather complex as they have complex brain structure. even the animals have certain emotions...
Jeebok 3 years ago 3
"The THEORY of Evilution is UNPROVED and UNPROVEABLE WE BELIEVE IT ' ONLY ' BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS SPECIAL CREATION...." Quote from Sir Arthur Keith ; Author of the Foreword for the book "Origin of Species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of ' FAVORED RACES' " by Charles Darwin (100th Edition). Turn or Burn!
av1611truth 4 years ago
The theory of evolution actually is based on facts.
We know that fish and reptiles have similarities and that in between them the amphibians fits perfectly.
Through archiological findings of bone structure, fossils, and dna, we can accurately say that there is a trend of evolution
beliserius 4 years ago
That is actually supposition. For macro evolution to be true, according to Darwin, there must be evidence provided by fossils showing transitional states. There are none. That we could imagine that one thing stems from another is not proof. If you believe macro evolution you believe it on FAITH alone, not proof.
tzephon 4 years ago
Fossils are very rare, dead organisms only can become fossils under certain and rare conditions, we can expect some gaps in the fossile record, they don´t disprove the theory of evolution at all. Critics of evolution often cite this argument as being a convenient way to explain the lack of 'snapshot' fossils that show crucial steps between species. However, progressing research and discovery are managing to fill in gaps.
DeletedDelusion 4 years ago 2
tzephon, it's time to crawl from beneath your rock MANY transitional form have been discovered.
And seperate from the fossilrecord, DNA and retroviral-dna certainly proof it.
Seeing it happen in front of our eyes is the only thing that's missing, but i'll take archeological evidence over theological nonsense anytime so don't take my word for it, grab a shovel and see for yourself.
mindwis3 4 years ago 3
Tzephon, Belief in evolution may be 'faith based' (though it really isn't) but at least it isn't blind faith.
paleosmoker 4 years ago