@Bantokfomoki the picture at 3:32 where you say: "when the particle is moving nearer to one pole than the other there will be a net up or down movement" together with the drawing at 3:44 looks suspiciously like the "signature" of the Norwegian light, and coincidentally it was pretty near one magnetic pole and pretty far from the other
I'll probably be wrong but i strongly feel the Norw. light had something to do with tech you're describing
a few powerful people were also there to see the "show"
I mean the worldwide increase of defective guidance systems causing rockets to malfunction and explode, which would mean rocket guidance systems aren't improving but deteriorating, which is just as worrying
These "spiraling lights in the sky" have also been found in ancient rock-paintings
I think what we're seeingshown are failed experiments but not all of 'm fail
a (more?) successful test has been filmed by civilians like N.L
I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name.
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name.
Good, I like that you share this video Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name., I wish success always
Nice Video Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
UFO and remote mind reading/manipulation technology was developed by the nazis by the end of WW2 without any alien help. : there is an extreme criminal orgonizaiton working withing high ranks of the US military waging psychological against the general population pretending to be extradimensional aliens and/or angelic and demonic forces often using holograms.
What is that talking about "it drives the system" or theoretical mentions here ? i cant stand it when people have read 30 years of babble literature and some medicre mechanics try to explain scientists what should work. why arent students commenting or engineers? it is already below their level ...
In other words: The way through the galaxies, not only to planets. Why?
Such a system would not even mean propulsion, as we understand it, whith acting an reacting forces. It is simply about tunneling spacetime, in an electromagnetic and maybe expanding or contracting bladder. The craft is not even moving within its inertial system, but propells it: Thus possibilities for infinite speed, with no effects on the crew. Time: It just takes as long as it takes. Not much, minutes or a blink of an eye.
@chickenitza34 a great friend of mine had an out-of-body exp.on a ufo,they wanted to impress upon her that they were piloting the craft with their minds what we call neural-interface
This guys is making it sound a lot more complicated than it really is, Their Main lift comes by Producing an Atomic Low Pressure Field above the saucer . That is easy to do if you know anything about _________ . Directional Control can be achieved by using The________ Effect , Power comes from an Over-Unity generator that taps into the Atmospheric Pressure of the Planet . If any Company or Entity wants to build a Flying Saucer I can show you Exactly How, BUT My secrets are NOT Cheap !
@nicktesla45 thats a bigger than big statement are you serious and whats your version of not cheap and lastly are you able to prove it if your terms are met?
@omagunna YES , I can prove my system since it is NOT a theory but a Fact since all the Working Principles are already at work in other inventions already in use on the Market . But I need to meet real Prospects and Investors not just Curiousity Seekers , Curiousity seekers do nothing for me except waste my time . My payment will be Part in Royalties and part in Down Payment upon revealing the Secrets before the Buyer and any Technicians and Scientists he may want to have present .
@nicktesla45 I disagree with this. What speeds are you talking? Interstellar speeds? OK, great, if you want to lift a craft, your theory might be correct-- but how about travel between stars?
There is strong evidence that interdimensional travel is REQUIRED for the ET's craft to get from there to here. And the right-angle turns which the craft take, take them OUT of the #d reality in which we operate, through other dimensions, to their star-- which exists in another dimension.
But this guy is wrong when he says laws are broken-- no laws of energy conservation are broken. He speaks of "something for nothing", but this is not true either. There is ALWAYS conservation of energy. The craft produce a shell of an extradimensional field around the craft.
He is operating analogously to improvements in the internal combustion engine. We must THROW out all the little sciences we are familiar with.
@saturnx311 No. The craft I am Talking about is just a Shuttle Type Disc Craft . For Interstellar travel you need to Create an Electomagnetic Vortex and and that Vortex has to be Interwoven like a Chinese Finger Trap with Saw-tooth waves that will Grab the Fields of Interstellar Hydrogen and all the Other particles and waves in free space . Then it is Spun to Pull the Ship Forward, IT works very much like an Electro-Static lens in a TV But at Hundreds of MegaVolts 2 bend the Fabric of Space.
@saturnx311 Another method to Bend Space is to use the "Law of Mutual Frequency Attraction" by using the "Frequency Fingerprint" of the sun of the solar system you wish to travel too . By Duplicating in in front of the Mothership It will Automaticaly be attracted to That Particular Sun and it will bend the Fabric of Space-time in the Process, I do NOT know Yet how to Create the Duplicator . Sorry But there are some things I have not Yet Studied cause man has to learn to walk before he can run.
@MrTiti An Atomic Low Pressure Field is an area of Space where there is a Very Low Number of Atoms and Molecules and Sub-atomic particles . The Lower the Pressure is made the faster the Flying Saucer will go in the Direction of that field . The field can be created on top of the Saucer and on any side of the Horizonal Perimeter . The Overunity Generator in the Center of the Saucer also acts as a Gyroscope to keep the Saucer level and balanced at all times .
have you ever heard of logic? im not trying to insult you. Logic is the ability to switch a hot circuit to a negative...just some food for thought....you could magnetize pin point spots with this basic technology.
Hi I was reading Joseph cater;s book.I have to agree except having a magnetic fluid rotating opposite direction would have an attraction to the other field.I have made a Rodin Coil with my own ferro fluid rotating with and ac current.Do you have suggestions on how to improve this design?..Thanks great work by the way.The Anti-gravity Research Facility.
@Antigravityreseach No suggestions. I don't know what will eventually work. I ... do ... know that there are very few permutations of experiments that can be tried. They all involve something going 'round & 'round and electric and/or magnetic fields and perhaps some superconductivity. You can't do too many very different experiments with the limited "stuff" spoken of ... and ... they will never be any more stuff to work with ;o) ... soooooo ... take a chance and hope for the best.
@Bantokfomoki I have for 4 decade and it not make you stupid like the disinfo. shows and movies make it look. I did, however, think you sounded very mono-toned. Just trying to help and not trying to be_____. :)
You should have told nicktesla straight: it is greed that has held this world back!
@CrimsnTiger I think I sound too monotone because I have to be very deliberate or else I screw up and have to re-record everything. I'm not used to talking.
@MrZaphaell Conceivably one could do that with a little bit of matter ... say ... .00000001 grams! For appreciable masses it's impossible to rotate something that fast. The centrifugal force would blow apart any conceivable containment long before relativistic velocities were achieved.
I've seen the video by AlienScientist and he's made a mistake here. Doubtless, he'd retract it if pressed on the subject. If not, he'd be totally discredited because it's just plain impossible to do that.
1) the saucers R only planet runners. The mother ships R mini blackholes - Sagen thought that they'd use Einsteins Rosen Bridges BUT these crafts R BLACKHOLES THEMSELVES! They don't fly through space - they BEND SPACE WHILE SHIP BECOMES LIGHT - this is how the laws R not broken. ENERGY = BILLIONS OF SUNS 2) The planetary runner saucers are using the Earth's magnetic core...AS THE OPPOSING FIELD, GET IT? - Inertia is canceled by opposing fields inside the craft neutralizing all motion.
1) it takes the energy of black holes (millions of stars) - to bend space. 2) They CAN covert solid mass to Light - is the most effective means of travel - the visible ones are the weakest - The stronger UV, gamma, & infared R invisible 2 human eye. This is why on the nasa ufo videos, it looks like they magical appear. WHEN THE SLOW DOWN 2 WEAKER LIGHT RAYS - THEY BECOME VISIBLE. 3) light rays during warp allows them to go around planets & asteroids.
@novanine9 It does not take "the energy of millions of stars" to bend space. A low power vector potential or scalr field will do that. Energy and mass both bend space time. Spacetime can there fore be ben with high powered electromagnetic, or electrostatic fields, as we have seen in 80-year old and modern experiments, devices, and systems.
@Nateyork89 The hypothesis isn't that they manipulate time or space but rather may cause the centrifugal vector of go out of the plane of rotation. That's all. This would constitute a reactionless drive if true. Conservation of linear and angular momentum ... and energy ... would then be statistically certain outcomes in ordinary events rather than 'a priori' rules of existence and violations could be structured into a machine. So far no one has done this - ever. UFOs seem to break these laws.
@Coobeans89 If the field of the rotating particle is tilted out of the plane of rotation ... that will be the direction of the centrifugal force. And ... there will be an up or down component in that vector ... which means that the ship will go in that direction, opposed only by the inertia of the non-rotating ship itself. It's not an ANTI force. It's just another force that can be directed against gravity ... like helicopter blades ... but without any reaction mass, i.e. it won't blow air.
@Bantokfomoki WOW actually u in FACT DO HAVE TO HAVE an anti g force mehanism... or a way to create itt..DO FUCKING REASEARCH.. I CAN GIVE U A BETTER OPINION OF HOW THEY WORK.. @ LMAO AT LIGHTER THAN AIR
@Nateyork89 This was the car in a UFO story where the witness said a bright white light sideswipe her car. She thought it must have been another vehicle but there were no scratches. It was as though a foam rubber roller were pressed against the side of the car and rolled across the side ... without any scratches. Definitely not weather. Either hoax or "unknown".
Part 2 - It could also be that the ufos aside from our USAF secret ones that all of us in the aerospace, electronics, black works projects know about are also just natural occurrences that we don't understand in terms of many different processes such as gravitation, weather etc. which cause formations of shapes that appear alien... I and countless others would say that these are unidentified flying objects not aliens.
Unless you see one how can you even suggest 'they' exist is that science?
@wingedlightning I'm not a scientist so I can say ... definitely ... that UFOs are real without having seen one. Scientists do not "move" the world ... the truth does ... in the long run. Scientists have been, since the time of Galileo, simple cowards (with notable exceptions).
Scientists run from truth till it runs them over ... then they "discover" it.
If I was a scientist ....... I'd have to kill myself ....... and that's the truth.
Aside from the science this is bullshit... to assume that advanced beings would even want to or need anything that is here including us is in itself idiotic, dogmatic... and plain dumb.
It is another thing to say that we still do not understand the 'beings' in us that we ourselves are... where our soul goes when death occurs... the natural ufo-like beings, energy that are all about the nasa tethers and shuttle but to say the 'aliens' is bullshit simply because we don't know if or what 'they' r.
@wingedlightning If the aliens are real ... then ... they must have some interest here ... or ... they wouldn't be here. So ... we assume that they want something (maybe just to observe something interesting). And ... yes ... the NASA tether thing IS pretty dumb ;o)
@Bantokfomoki lol... I just do not buy it... I will only accept facts, based upon scientific double blind... while we can theorize on why, what the other ufos are... meaning the ones that are not us humans as in U.S.A., RUSSIA, CHINA... like the ones mentioned in the nasa video clip that swarmed to the tether... again... simply an un explained phenomena which in time and experiment can be understood.
As for aliens coming from different stars... I do not buy it~!
@wingedlightning I buy it because of what a multitude of responsible people say. I haven't seen one myself :o(
In the past, people said "Rocks fall from the sky" and the scientists didn't believe them. (Meteorites)
Then sailors said for decades that huge monster waves were sinking boats in the mid-ocean and the scientists said it was impossible because their equations forbade it ... till a satellite survey of wave heights showed the little beasties all over the place.
@Bantokfomoki Listen, I understand your point yet it is in a totally different topic that does not compare or contrast to what your speaking about now. There is no scientific evidence that their are any aliens in existence.
The grouping of the ufos' that are seen in the nasa tether video footage for example can be explained as a simple "natural" occurrence that we just don't understand the total process or workings that cause them to attract towards electricity.
Part 2-Logic says that an advanced being such as what would be necessary to travel in interstellar space would not need to observe us in anyway shape or form due to the simple fact that they would already know from all sorts of advanced mediums including the communications we ourselves have beamed into the ether both directly and indirectly via television, radio, now satellites, etc.
Now do I believe that life exists elsewhere in the cosmos 'YES', of course... but aliens here... 'NO'~!
@wingedlightning Well ... if they know everything ... then ... they can just kill themselves and save themselves the trouble of breathing 'cause that's not very interesting. ;o) Whatever they're doing ... it's because they are "exercising their identity" as a sentient being. They are social beings (because they go with other aliens and not by themselves).
I'd just like to see if I could produce even the slightest upward momentum vector- that would change everything! Even if it didn't work setting it up and trying is the fun part :)
btw you can order those electromagnets, they are really strong and they're the roughly size of 10 cd's stacked
@Bungholiothe2nd If you get a really strong magnet ... it becomes somewhat dangerous. There are some magnets that you can lose you hand to (for wind power generation). One other thing I'm going to mention in my next video is that whatever is rotating might need a tangential acceleration to work optimally. The acceleration I'm using is all static, constant radial. If you've got lots of time and money on your hands you could find worse projects to play with AND no girl will get pregnant ;o)
Very nicely done, this seems similar to the idea behind the Em-drive- am I correct in saying that? Experimentally what are the limiting factors in testing these theories (besides money) ?
So it is the temporary break down of the neutron into (+ -) ellipsoid pairs rotating at high speeds in strong magnetic fields that gives rise to the upward vector out of the plane of rotation?
Could I possibly find a cheap way of increasing the net drift velocity of electrons in a conducting material?
@Bungholiothe2nd No. It has nothing to do with the Em Drive. Money is not the problem ... it's whether the underlying theory is correct. Likely, it's not. But it's all I can think of that could duplicate UFO maneuvers.
It would be the centrifugal force that causes a partial charge difference. The magnetic field could then work on the separated charges.
I don't know of any cheap way of doing that. I wouldn't expect anyone to toss his money at strange ideas till they're verified completely.
"It would be the centrifugal force that causes a partial charge difference. The magnetic field could then work on the separated charges."
- right, so why would a centrifugal force break down a neutron into nicely organized pairs with all on the negative charges on the outer radius of rotation- couldn't they break down in a random orientation?
I think the problem (if the theory is right) will be mostly with the strength of the magnetic field. I have a new experiment - that does not work - operating at much higher velocity with a 3" neodymium magnet. I think I've successfully ruled out any amateur feasibility experiment. My magnet loses out to the earth's magnetic field at about 1 meter. UFOs upset airplane electronics at 200 meters or more. If it works, it will be in a laboratory with superconductors and very high field strengths.
@Bantokfomoki hmm you need to upgrade your equipment sir, I have a 50$ electromagnet that can exert 250 pounds of lift, now If I had say 10 of these I think I would be in the range of upsetting airplane equipment at 200 feet...The part I am most concerned with is getting a large enough angular velocity on those neutrons for a slight separation to occur.
I suppose if done correctly the magnets themselves could provide some of the circular acceleration on a conducting metal disk with the neutrons
@Bungholiothe2nd There are loads of options here but I think it will take state of the art equipment just to get a proof of feasibility ... superconductors, high grade electromagnetic fields, etc. All of these doors are closed to me but might be open to someone else ... somewhere. And if anyone succeeded, they'd have to go public immediately just to stay alive ... no secret shit here ... just the truth ;o)
You are dead wrong doc !! You still have to read some of the books I have read IF your University or Superiors will Allow you to read such books . BUT as long as you don't know what creates gravity How do expect to create antigravity ?? That is very absurd ! You are turning something very simple into something very complex !!
That may well be. That's why people do experiments.
Name the best book you know of that gives a simpler explanation than I do ... I mean one that involves material functions rather than just a string of unintelligible words. I'd like to see an explanation that's simpler than "motion" in a "curved reference frame".
PS - I have no one to answer to. I'm on my own here ;o)
@robmonty248 I don't think that would work at all, I think with planets being millions of miles apart the fields would not even be detectable let alone enough to propel UFO, no I think you have to warp the fabric of space to travel vast distances instantly, at least that way a living organism be it ET or man would only have to put up with hi amounts of G force for a moment, which kinda answers alot of questions like how can ET survive such high speeds and instant turns.
also does the theory of rigidity in space and precession work in the space? Most of the people are talking about space crafts (UFO's) and how they fly based on the earth's atmosphere... ...ufo's come from somewhere in the space :) therefore there is no "airmass" or any other type of mass in the space at the volume level of what the atmosphere is. What I mean is that there is almost no skin (friction) drag. In the atmosphere you have the air and the air makes an airplane to fly...
It is a plan, it could or could not work, you can not judge an experiment based on theory, you will have to try in real life and actually see. There are many things that dont work with the 1+1=2 theory. You guys might think that this is what it is in theory but you need to take as a consideration that you might missed something. Now as far as the forces based on the magnetic fields I would say its a good theory but how about plasma? What do you guys think about plasma type of forces?
It would be imposible for a craft to move near the speed of light with a magnetic field/anti gravity propulsion system, it would need to manipulate light to be able to move vast distances or maybe what im trying to say is maybe create some kind of vortex to move quickly from one destination to another, in-orbit.
would your theory work in space ? what about when the craft has gone beyond earths gravity field?
The reactionless system I posited would necessarily work in empty interstellar space. It has nothing to do with gravity. I did touch on a possible gravitational propulsion system but that wouldn't work for interstellar travel. To me "anti-gravity" only means that a gravitational field is being pushed off of ... or utilized ... to propel an object. Reactionless means ... "in violation of conservation of linear momentum". It doesn't need a gravitational field at all.
@mistymoobones in space forces are concerved infinitively because there is no gravity or friction, therfore everything can float or move at a constant speed for ever until an opposite force acts against this speed.
What does "bending light" have to do with the movement of a craft? Are you certain you're responding to this video and not some other that you were at before? By definition, moving vast distances is exactly what this WOULD DO ... if ... it were found to work.
i dont hink this would be enough to be able to move the craft vast distances, i think the craft would need to be able to bend light to move from one destination to another, sure it could somehow use earths magnetic energy and gravity to move near earth but in orbit it must be able to bend light to move from one point to another, ive only ever seen one ufo in my life and it was a typical saucer shape, however this particular craft tilted sideways before dissapearing in the blink of an eye,
@Bantokfomoki the picture at 3:32 where you say: "when the particle is moving nearer to one pole than the other there will be a net up or down movement" together with the drawing at 3:44 looks suspiciously like the "signature" of the Norwegian light, and coincidentally it was pretty near one magnetic pole and pretty far from the other
I'll probably be wrong but i strongly feel the Norw. light had something to do with tech you're describing
a few powerful people were also there to see the "show"
paarsefrikandel 1 week ago
@paarsefrikandel i don't mean the Aurora Borealis
I mean the worldwide increase of defective guidance systems causing rockets to malfunction and explode, which would mean rocket guidance systems aren't improving but deteriorating, which is just as worrying
These "spiraling lights in the sky" have also been found in ancient rock-paintings
I think what we're seeingshown are failed experiments but not all of 'm fail
a (more?) successful test has been filmed by civilians like N.L
paarsefrikandel 1 week ago
if you ufo lost all its weight you can travel with no propulsion
TheSaltysack 3 weeks ago
@TheSaltysack If it lost all its weight ... it wouldn't be there ;o)
Bantokfomoki 3 weeks ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name.
AntoMelta 3 weeks ago
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name.
willamricard 3 weeks ago
Steady I Really Like This Video Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name.
imegatrone 3 weeks ago
Good, I like that you share this video Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name., I wish success always
Melehete 3 weeks ago
Nice Video Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
NganaJHone 3 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video From Your Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name.
Ondelendo 3 weeks ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Some additional details regarding the UFO propulsion system proposed in my first video of the same name.
bundawartini 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UFO and remote mind reading/manipulation technology was developed by the nazis by the end of WW2 without any alien help. : there is an extreme criminal orgonizaiton working withing high ranks of the US military waging psychological against the general population pretending to be extradimensional aliens and/or angelic and demonic forces often using holograms.
hope4world3000 1 month ago
teach and keep trying )))
RobotN001 1 month ago
What is that talking about "it drives the system" or theoretical mentions here ? i cant stand it when people have read 30 years of babble literature and some medicre mechanics try to explain scientists what should work. why arent students commenting or engineers? it is already below their level ...
MrTiti 1 month ago
In other words: The way through the galaxies, not only to planets. Why?
Such a system would not even mean propulsion, as we understand it, whith acting an reacting forces. It is simply about tunneling spacetime, in an electromagnetic and maybe expanding or contracting bladder. The craft is not even moving within its inertial system, but propells it: Thus possibilities for infinite speed, with no effects on the crew. Time: It just takes as long as it takes. Not much, minutes or a blink of an eye.
chickenitza34 1 month ago
@chickenitza34 infinite speed = no violation of speed of light. The craft is not moving, it drives the system. No bending of spacetime required
We would see nothing. When it slows down, the first thing we see is pulsating light, than light...BUILD IT
chickenitza34 1 month ago
@chickenitza34 a great friend of mine had an out-of-body exp.on a ufo,they wanted to impress upon her that they were piloting the craft with their minds what we call neural-interface
jimi291154 1 month ago
Comment removed
bongnbud 3 months ago
@bongnbud Lots of things go better with a good dubee.
Bantokfomoki 3 months ago
this guy should be on discovery channel or nova!
lmonto 3 months ago
This guys is making it sound a lot more complicated than it really is, Their Main lift comes by Producing an Atomic Low Pressure Field above the saucer . That is easy to do if you know anything about _________ . Directional Control can be achieved by using The________ Effect , Power comes from an Over-Unity generator that taps into the Atmospheric Pressure of the Planet . If any Company or Entity wants to build a Flying Saucer I can show you Exactly How, BUT My secrets are NOT Cheap !
nicktesla45 4 months ago
@nicktesla45 Your post speaks volumes.
Bantokfomoki 4 months ago
@nicktesla45 thats a bigger than big statement are you serious and whats your version of not cheap and lastly are you able to prove it if your terms are met?
omagunna 3 months ago
@omagunna YES , I can prove my system since it is NOT a theory but a Fact since all the Working Principles are already at work in other inventions already in use on the Market . But I need to meet real Prospects and Investors not just Curiousity Seekers , Curiousity seekers do nothing for me except waste my time . My payment will be Part in Royalties and part in Down Payment upon revealing the Secrets before the Buyer and any Technicians and Scientists he may want to have present .
nicktesla45 3 months ago
@nicktesla45 I disagree with this. What speeds are you talking? Interstellar speeds? OK, great, if you want to lift a craft, your theory might be correct-- but how about travel between stars?
There is strong evidence that interdimensional travel is REQUIRED for the ET's craft to get from there to here. And the right-angle turns which the craft take, take them OUT of the #d reality in which we operate, through other dimensions, to their star-- which exists in another dimension.
saturnx311 1 month ago
@saturnx311 I meant 3D, not #d, sorry.
But this guy is wrong when he says laws are broken-- no laws of energy conservation are broken. He speaks of "something for nothing", but this is not true either. There is ALWAYS conservation of energy. The craft produce a shell of an extradimensional field around the craft.
He is operating analogously to improvements in the internal combustion engine. We must THROW out all the little sciences we are familiar with.
He needs to openhis mind.
saturnx311 1 month ago
@saturnx311 No. The craft I am Talking about is just a Shuttle Type Disc Craft . For Interstellar travel you need to Create an Electomagnetic Vortex and and that Vortex has to be Interwoven like a Chinese Finger Trap with Saw-tooth waves that will Grab the Fields of Interstellar Hydrogen and all the Other particles and waves in free space . Then it is Spun to Pull the Ship Forward, IT works very much like an Electro-Static lens in a TV But at Hundreds of MegaVolts 2 bend the Fabric of Space.
nicktesla45 1 month ago
@saturnx311 Another method to Bend Space is to use the "Law of Mutual Frequency Attraction" by using the "Frequency Fingerprint" of the sun of the solar system you wish to travel too . By Duplicating in in front of the Mothership It will Automaticaly be attracted to That Particular Sun and it will bend the Fabric of Space-time in the Process, I do NOT know Yet how to Create the Duplicator . Sorry But there are some things I have not Yet Studied cause man has to learn to walk before he can run.
nicktesla45 1 month ago
@nicktesla45 i seldom speak English, but what is an "Atomic Low Pressure Field" ?
MrTiti 1 month ago
@MrTiti An Atomic Low Pressure Field is an area of Space where there is a Very Low Number of Atoms and Molecules and Sub-atomic particles . The Lower the Pressure is made the faster the Flying Saucer will go in the Direction of that field . The field can be created on top of the Saucer and on any side of the Horizonal Perimeter . The Overunity Generator in the Center of the Saucer also acts as a Gyroscope to keep the Saucer level and balanced at all times .
nicktesla45 1 month ago
INTERESTING.
moya138 4 months ago
ur voice is so monotone and awefull...it make me sleep...im sorry but u need a change of sound
filigrant 5 months ago
have you ever heard of logic? im not trying to insult you. Logic is the ability to switch a hot circuit to a negative...just some food for thought....you could magnetize pin point spots with this basic technology.
doctergonads 5 months ago
Hi I was reading Joseph cater;s book.I have to agree except having a magnetic fluid rotating opposite direction would have an attraction to the other field.I have made a Rodin Coil with my own ferro fluid rotating with and ac current.Do you have suggestions on how to improve this design?..Thanks great work by the way.The Anti-gravity Research Facility.
Antigravityreseach 5 months ago
@Antigravityreseach No suggestions. I don't know what will eventually work. I ... do ... know that there are very few permutations of experiments that can be tried. They all involve something going 'round & 'round and electric and/or magnetic fields and perhaps some superconductivity. You can't do too many very different experiments with the limited "stuff" spoken of ... and ... they will never be any more stuff to work with ;o) ... soooooo ... take a chance and hope for the best.
Bantokfomoki 5 months ago
@Antigravityreseach Don't they use monopoles?
saturnx311 1 month ago
Sounds completely stoned. Were you stoned when you recorded this?
LordFancourt 5 months ago
@LordFancourt No, I don't smoke no mo' blo'. Were you stoned when you watched it? ;o)
Bantokfomoki 5 months ago
@Bantokfomoki I have for 4 decade and it not make you stupid like the disinfo. shows and movies make it look. I did, however, think you sounded very mono-toned. Just trying to help and not trying to be_____. :)
You should have told nicktesla straight: it is greed that has held this world back!
If, in fact, he knows anything at all.
CrimsnTiger 2 months ago
@CrimsnTiger I think I sound too monotone because I have to be very deliberate or else I screw up and have to re-record everything. I'm not used to talking.
Bantokfomoki 2 months ago
Great mass of rotating ring can be achieved by rotating it with speeds close to light speed, so kinetic energy would build mass. See video on
youtube.com/watch?v=Hiu4W27EQ_I&NR=1
MrZaphaell 8 months ago
@MrZaphaell Conceivably one could do that with a little bit of matter ... say ... .00000001 grams! For appreciable masses it's impossible to rotate something that fast. The centrifugal force would blow apart any conceivable containment long before relativistic velocities were achieved.
I've seen the video by AlienScientist and he's made a mistake here. Doubtless, he'd retract it if pressed on the subject. If not, he'd be totally discredited because it's just plain impossible to do that.
Bantokfomoki 8 months ago
1) the saucers R only planet runners. The mother ships R mini blackholes - Sagen thought that they'd use Einsteins Rosen Bridges BUT these crafts R BLACKHOLES THEMSELVES! They don't fly through space - they BEND SPACE WHILE SHIP BECOMES LIGHT - this is how the laws R not broken. ENERGY = BILLIONS OF SUNS 2) The planetary runner saucers are using the Earth's magnetic core...AS THE OPPOSING FIELD, GET IT? - Inertia is canceled by opposing fields inside the craft neutralizing all motion.
novanine9 8 months ago
@novanine9 Gee ... your plate is really full! Are you really sure you want to eat all that?
Bantokfomoki 8 months ago
@Bantokfomoki - heh, heh...yeah i know.
novanine9 8 months ago
@Bantokfomoki - Yeah, I know...
1) it takes the energy of black holes (millions of stars) - to bend space. 2) They CAN covert solid mass to Light - is the most effective means of travel - the visible ones are the weakest - The stronger UV, gamma, & infared R invisible 2 human eye. This is why on the nasa ufo videos, it looks like they magical appear. WHEN THE SLOW DOWN 2 WEAKER LIGHT RAYS - THEY BECOME VISIBLE. 3) light rays during warp allows them to go around planets & asteroids.
novanine9 8 months ago
@novanine9 It does not take "the energy of millions of stars" to bend space. A low power vector potential or scalr field will do that. Energy and mass both bend space time. Spacetime can there fore be ben with high powered electromagnetic, or electrostatic fields, as we have seen in 80-year old and modern experiments, devices, and systems.
Beamshipcaptain 6 months ago
also... when did magnetic fields manipulate space? and time itself?
Nateyork89 9 months ago
@Nateyork89 The hypothesis isn't that they manipulate time or space but rather may cause the centrifugal vector of go out of the plane of rotation. That's all. This would constitute a reactionless drive if true. Conservation of linear and angular momentum ... and energy ... would then be statistically certain outcomes in ordinary events rather than 'a priori' rules of existence and violations could be structured into a machine. So far no one has done this - ever. UFOs seem to break these laws.
Bantokfomoki 9 months ago
@Bantokfomoki hmm well what would creat an anti g force mechanism?
Coobeans89 7 months ago
@Coobeans89 If the field of the rotating particle is tilted out of the plane of rotation ... that will be the direction of the centrifugal force. And ... there will be an up or down component in that vector ... which means that the ship will go in that direction, opposed only by the inertia of the non-rotating ship itself. It's not an ANTI force. It's just another force that can be directed against gravity ... like helicopter blades ... but without any reaction mass, i.e. it won't blow air.
Bantokfomoki 7 months ago
@Bantokfomoki WOW actually u in FACT DO HAVE TO HAVE an anti g force mehanism... or a way to create itt..DO FUCKING REASEARCH.. I CAN GIVE U A BETTER OPINION OF HOW THEY WORK.. @ LMAO AT LIGHTER THAN AIR
Coobeans89 7 months ago
@Coobeans89 Yes ... I saw the lighter than air UFO "music" video too. How can anybody buy into that ?!? But I get some hits from it.
Bantokfomoki 7 months ago
lol @ random car probly a weather damaged car
Nateyork89 9 months ago
@Nateyork89 This was the car in a UFO story where the witness said a bright white light sideswipe her car. She thought it must have been another vehicle but there were no scratches. It was as though a foam rubber roller were pressed against the side of the car and rolled across the side ... without any scratches. Definitely not weather. Either hoax or "unknown".
Bantokfomoki 9 months ago
Part 2 - It could also be that the ufos aside from our USAF secret ones that all of us in the aerospace, electronics, black works projects know about are also just natural occurrences that we don't understand in terms of many different processes such as gravitation, weather etc. which cause formations of shapes that appear alien... I and countless others would say that these are unidentified flying objects not aliens.
Unless you see one how can you even suggest 'they' exist is that science?
wingedlightning 10 months ago
@wingedlightning I'm not a scientist so I can say ... definitely ... that UFOs are real without having seen one. Scientists do not "move" the world ... the truth does ... in the long run. Scientists have been, since the time of Galileo, simple cowards (with notable exceptions).
Scientists run from truth till it runs them over ... then they "discover" it.
If I was a scientist ....... I'd have to kill myself ....... and that's the truth.
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
Aside from the science this is bullshit... to assume that advanced beings would even want to or need anything that is here including us is in itself idiotic, dogmatic... and plain dumb.
It is another thing to say that we still do not understand the 'beings' in us that we ourselves are... where our soul goes when death occurs... the natural ufo-like beings, energy that are all about the nasa tethers and shuttle but to say the 'aliens' is bullshit simply because we don't know if or what 'they' r.
wingedlightning 10 months ago
@wingedlightning If the aliens are real ... then ... they must have some interest here ... or ... they wouldn't be here. So ... we assume that they want something (maybe just to observe something interesting). And ... yes ... the NASA tether thing IS pretty dumb ;o)
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
@Bantokfomoki lol... I just do not buy it... I will only accept facts, based upon scientific double blind... while we can theorize on why, what the other ufos are... meaning the ones that are not us humans as in U.S.A., RUSSIA, CHINA... like the ones mentioned in the nasa video clip that swarmed to the tether... again... simply an un explained phenomena which in time and experiment can be understood.
As for aliens coming from different stars... I do not buy it~!
wingedlightning 10 months ago
@wingedlightning I buy it because of what a multitude of responsible people say. I haven't seen one myself :o(
In the past, people said "Rocks fall from the sky" and the scientists didn't believe them. (Meteorites)
Then sailors said for decades that huge monster waves were sinking boats in the mid-ocean and the scientists said it was impossible because their equations forbade it ... till a satellite survey of wave heights showed the little beasties all over the place.
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
@Bantokfomoki Listen, I understand your point yet it is in a totally different topic that does not compare or contrast to what your speaking about now. There is no scientific evidence that their are any aliens in existence.
The grouping of the ufos' that are seen in the nasa tether video footage for example can be explained as a simple "natural" occurrence that we just don't understand the total process or workings that cause them to attract towards electricity.
wingedlightning 10 months ago
Part 2-Logic says that an advanced being such as what would be necessary to travel in interstellar space would not need to observe us in anyway shape or form due to the simple fact that they would already know from all sorts of advanced mediums including the communications we ourselves have beamed into the ether both directly and indirectly via television, radio, now satellites, etc.
Now do I believe that life exists elsewhere in the cosmos 'YES', of course... but aliens here... 'NO'~!
wingedlightning 10 months ago
@wingedlightning Well ... if they know everything ... then ... they can just kill themselves and save themselves the trouble of breathing 'cause that's not very interesting. ;o) Whatever they're doing ... it's because they are "exercising their identity" as a sentient being. They are social beings (because they go with other aliens and not by themselves).
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
hah ok I'll be waiting
Bungholiothe2nd 10 months ago
I'd just like to see if I could produce even the slightest upward momentum vector- that would change everything! Even if it didn't work setting it up and trying is the fun part :)
btw you can order those electromagnets, they are really strong and they're the roughly size of 10 cd's stacked
Bungholiothe2nd 10 months ago
@Bungholiothe2nd If you get a really strong magnet ... it becomes somewhat dangerous. There are some magnets that you can lose you hand to (for wind power generation). One other thing I'm going to mention in my next video is that whatever is rotating might need a tangential acceleration to work optimally. The acceleration I'm using is all static, constant radial. If you've got lots of time and money on your hands you could find worse projects to play with AND no girl will get pregnant ;o)
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
Very nicely done, this seems similar to the idea behind the Em-drive- am I correct in saying that? Experimentally what are the limiting factors in testing these theories (besides money) ?
So it is the temporary break down of the neutron into (+ -) ellipsoid pairs rotating at high speeds in strong magnetic fields that gives rise to the upward vector out of the plane of rotation?
Could I possibly find a cheap way of increasing the net drift velocity of electrons in a conducting material?
Bungholiothe2nd 10 months ago
@Bungholiothe2nd No. It has nothing to do with the Em Drive. Money is not the problem ... it's whether the underlying theory is correct. Likely, it's not. But it's all I can think of that could duplicate UFO maneuvers.
It would be the centrifugal force that causes a partial charge difference. The magnetic field could then work on the separated charges.
I don't know of any cheap way of doing that. I wouldn't expect anyone to toss his money at strange ideas till they're verified completely.
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Bantokfomoki
"It would be the centrifugal force that causes a partial charge difference. The magnetic field could then work on the separated charges."
- right, so why would a centrifugal force break down a neutron into nicely organized pairs with all on the negative charges on the outer radius of rotation- couldn't they break down in a random orientation?
Bungholiothe2nd 10 months ago
so you would need a fast enough rotation speed to pull those neutrons apart?
Bungholiothe2nd 10 months ago
I think the problem (if the theory is right) will be mostly with the strength of the magnetic field. I have a new experiment - that does not work - operating at much higher velocity with a 3" neodymium magnet. I think I've successfully ruled out any amateur feasibility experiment. My magnet loses out to the earth's magnetic field at about 1 meter. UFOs upset airplane electronics at 200 meters or more. If it works, it will be in a laboratory with superconductors and very high field strengths.
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
@Bantokfomoki hmm you need to upgrade your equipment sir, I have a 50$ electromagnet that can exert 250 pounds of lift, now If I had say 10 of these I think I would be in the range of upsetting airplane equipment at 200 feet...The part I am most concerned with is getting a large enough angular velocity on those neutrons for a slight separation to occur.
I suppose if done correctly the magnets themselves could provide some of the circular acceleration on a conducting metal disk with the neutrons
Bungholiothe2nd 10 months ago
@Bungholiothe2nd There are loads of options here but I think it will take state of the art equipment just to get a proof of feasibility ... superconductors, high grade electromagnetic fields, etc. All of these doors are closed to me but might be open to someone else ... somewhere. And if anyone succeeded, they'd have to go public immediately just to stay alive ... no secret shit here ... just the truth ;o)
Bantokfomoki 10 months ago
You are dead wrong doc !! You still have to read some of the books I have read IF your University or Superiors will Allow you to read such books . BUT as long as you don't know what creates gravity How do expect to create antigravity ?? That is very absurd ! You are turning something very simple into something very complex !!
nicktesla45 1 year ago
That may well be. That's why people do experiments.
Name the best book you know of that gives a simpler explanation than I do ... I mean one that involves material functions rather than just a string of unintelligible words. I'd like to see an explanation that's simpler than "motion" in a "curved reference frame".
PS - I have no one to answer to. I'm on my own here ;o)
Bantokfomoki 1 year ago
@robmonty248 I don't think that would work at all, I think with planets being millions of miles apart the fields would not even be detectable let alone enough to propel UFO, no I think you have to warp the fabric of space to travel vast distances instantly, at least that way a living organism be it ET or man would only have to put up with hi amounts of G force for a moment, which kinda answers alot of questions like how can ET survive such high speeds and instant turns.
mistymoobones 1 year ago
also does the theory of rigidity in space and precession work in the space? Most of the people are talking about space crafts (UFO's) and how they fly based on the earth's atmosphere... ...ufo's come from somewhere in the space :) therefore there is no "airmass" or any other type of mass in the space at the volume level of what the atmosphere is. What I mean is that there is almost no skin (friction) drag. In the atmosphere you have the air and the air makes an airplane to fly...
flagkakis 1 year ago
It is a plan, it could or could not work, you can not judge an experiment based on theory, you will have to try in real life and actually see. There are many things that dont work with the 1+1=2 theory. You guys might think that this is what it is in theory but you need to take as a consideration that you might missed something. Now as far as the forces based on the magnetic fields I would say its a good theory but how about plasma? What do you guys think about plasma type of forces?
flagkakis 1 year ago
F*cK Yea dude. i'm outta here !
TheMeansardine 1 year ago
It would be imposible for a craft to move near the speed of light with a magnetic field/anti gravity propulsion system, it would need to manipulate light to be able to move vast distances or maybe what im trying to say is maybe create some kind of vortex to move quickly from one destination to another, in-orbit.
would your theory work in space ? what about when the craft has gone beyond earths gravity field?
mistymoobones 1 year ago
The reactionless system I posited would necessarily work in empty interstellar space. It has nothing to do with gravity. I did touch on a possible gravitational propulsion system but that wouldn't work for interstellar travel. To me "anti-gravity" only means that a gravitational field is being pushed off of ... or utilized ... to propel an object. Reactionless means ... "in violation of conservation of linear momentum". It doesn't need a gravitational field at all.
Bantokfomoki 1 year ago
Comment removed
RobMonty248 1 year ago
@mistymoobones Change the center of gravity, as in, hook into the next closest planet..
RobMonty248 1 year ago
@mistymoobones in space forces are concerved infinitively because there is no gravity or friction, therfore everything can float or move at a constant speed for ever until an opposite force acts against this speed.
jordypiano 1 year ago
What does "bending light" have to do with the movement of a craft? Are you certain you're responding to this video and not some other that you were at before? By definition, moving vast distances is exactly what this WOULD DO ... if ... it were found to work.
Bantokfomoki 1 year ago
i dont hink this would be enough to be able to move the craft vast distances, i think the craft would need to be able to bend light to move from one destination to another, sure it could somehow use earths magnetic energy and gravity to move near earth but in orbit it must be able to bend light to move from one point to another, ive only ever seen one ufo in my life and it was a typical saucer shape, however this particular craft tilted sideways before dissapearing in the blink of an eye,
mistymoobones 1 year ago