Added: 6 months ago
From: WildBillforAmerica
Views: 6,165
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This guy is a fucking idiot. He is blaming the Democrats for what the RETHUGLICANS have done to fuck the Country up!! He lies in his first words alone. This WAR was started by The Right not the left. Seriously how the hell do you listen to an inbred fuck thats totally hypocritical. He speaks of God, yet he backs the side that WANTS WAR!! And doesnt give a shit for the weak and poor!!??? All you fucktards that hit "like" better re-check yourselves!!

  • @cybershark72 He's not blaming the democrats what the republicans did. he's blaming the democrats for carrying on the damages of the republicans.

  • @cybershark72 Cybershark..Might wanna do 2 things. Expand your language to where you don't have to use vulgarity,and dig DEEP into the facts of who did what. I'm not going to tell you. Just look. Find a reputeable place for information. Then come back on here and let us know what is truly happening. You'll get a LOT more responses if you can talk like an informed adult instead of a 12 year old trying to impress the little girls.

  • The liberal left and the Neocon right are both controlled by the same Zionists. Want to cure Americas problems? Then root out the Zionist demons detroying all Aryan nations. Free Palestine, Free Sullivan county, Free us all !!!!!

  • One of those two things is imaginary.

  • Get off your ass and VOTE!!!!!

  • Here in Norway Liberalism is actually considered right-side politics. We have Socialism, Marxism and Communism on the left. Makes me think of how left-wing Norway really is.

    After the terror attack we Conservatives is considered as racists and terrorists, almost Nazis. We are harassed in the media, and if we dare to express our opinions about immigration and Islam, we risk threats from Muslims and leftists.

    You are fortunate in America.

  • @mmarela yes we are and we have better stand up and remind liberals that we are, like it or not !

  • WOW AFTER READING SOME OF THESE...WOW! ONE PERSON IN PARTICULAR...YOU NEED TO GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS AND WAKE UP AND SEE WHAT IS REALLY GOIN ON IN THIS COUNTRY.

  • What is this you are saying "the liberal left had managed to do a tomendous amount of damage to this country, we are stuck in multiple wars . . ." excuse me . . seems like I remember that 16 Saudi Nationals came to America, hijacked 4 planes, crashed them in to World Trade Center Buildings and Pentagon, and the then Republican President Bush attracted Afghanistan and lated Irag all in the name of USA national security.  What was it that the liberal left had to do with these multiple wars?

  • @DougPrice3 how about libya, and those "advisors" he send into arfrica, i would belive this doubles our conflicts,

    and yes the first two WERE a war on mus-slim (thank God) the whole middle east save for Israel needs cleaned out, open your eyes once in a while- might help

  • @drumking241 Turn the entire area into a giant solar collector. Park a geosynchronous orbit to clooct the reflection and beam the power back to earth. Then the middle east would serve a valid purpose.

  • @cmblake6 sounds good! at least the sh-t hole then could be used for something, i can hear the hippies now though, no blood for sun light!! -lol-

  • @drumking241 And we could then drill through the glass because we could see exactly where the oil is!

  • /watch?v=fWW50UP-FlU&feature=r­elated

  • He used to be an accountant! Coughlan616 Made a video about him called I Come To Bury Wild Bill for America. PLEASE GO WATCH IT, HE COUGHLAN JUST MADE IT. WILD BILL IS A LIAR AND A FRAUD!.

  • This "mans" name is BILL FINLAY. LOOK HIM UP, HE IS IMPERSONATING A U.S. MARSHALL. Which is illegal and wrong to be asking for donations while lying about his past as a law enforcement officer. It's sickening! Hes a fraud!

  • @White14Man  I hope you can prove that in writing if not this is slander and defamation of character. I call BS on your statement PROVE IT OR BE SUED

  • Founded on faith in God? Someone needs a history lesson.

  • @martinjwillett Freedom of religion means you can worship your God, where ever and when ever you please, as the government cannot tell you what religion you can have or when/ where you can practice it. Freedom from religion means you don't have any religion at all. It's as simple as that.

  • and VOT, VOTE VOTE!

  • @mmarela But I'm muslim and I live here too. Why can we not co-exist?

  • obama didnt create the economic problem, that predates his presidency.

    the govt as a whole is out to screw you because they all answer to the same lobbiests & investors that pay for their election campaigns.

    and the wealthiest top 10% are making off like bandits as the govts tax everyone else into poverty to keep their rich buddies happy.

  • why the hell would god favour one country over another? The whole point of religion is to cut through this patriotic crap, they both do not coexist together

  • Very well said and true to facts. a much needed video bill thank you.. people put this into action share this video with those like minded and more.. were in the heat of the battle and we must continue to push and restore the republic. i know we will..

  • I wish I shared your optimism we may be a nation of mostly Christians but we sat quietly for too long. The chances of us going back to our former glory are astronomical. I will still vote and say my peace no matter how unpopular it is but we are screwed. I lost so much because of this prick, my chances of retirement now are slim to none.

  • I will agree with you on "Country". A truly logical thinking individual wouldn't take the bible at face value. I agree with you on everything else.

  • A nation built on faith? Clearly you were too afraid of liberal indoctrination to pay any attention to history. The United States of America is one of very few countries whose constitution is NOT built on faith or a state religion. The world is full of religious states - and most of them are complete basket cases. It is freedom FROM religion that made America great. America is a secular state full of people not afraid to believe what they believe, or don't. That is the source of your greatness.

  • @MartinJWillett Your Statement "NOT built on faith or a state religion." Shows a typical lack of understanding Words...Big difference between Faith and Religion. In fact they are not even close. Faith never had anything to do with a specific religion.

    FAITH: Faith is trust, hope and belief in the goodness, trustworthiness or reliability of a person, concept or entity. It can also refer to beliefs that are not based on proof (e.g. faith that a child will grow up to be a good person)

  • @cjbart2 Do you know the meaning of the word OR? If faith and religion meant the same think I could and would have chosen one to stand for both. I meant both and I know that they are different things, that is why I used both. Based on neither faith nor religion is what I meant, and it is also effectively what I wrote, for those with eyes to read English.

  • @MartinJWillett You need to re read the constitution, the term is Freedom of Religion, not from religion.

  • @af25985330 What's the practical difference? True freedom of religion involves total freedom from religion also. Freedom of choice of which form of religion you have to be seen to follow is not freedom at all.

  • USA,  G.. IS WITH YOU, HAVE NO FEAR

  • DAMN RIGHT, WILD BILL!

  • WildBill is a man man . He should be hired to make Old spices commercials, and that's probably the reason why pansy leftists hate him.

  • Funny how there is an ad for joining Obama on his 2012 campaign at the top right, talk about ad fail

  • Bill..you just might be the smartest man in America!!

  • Bill, these are all great videos and speaks from your heart but most importantly it directly reflects the vast majority's feelings. This one in particular hit a home-run. Thank you.

  • liberals....they are whats wrong with this country. I pray you are right! great vid!

  • @kerryhooks And about separation of church and state: watch?v=lWBG8byqqUI

  • @CollinMaessen The separation of church and state is ACTUALLY NOT FOUND in the constitution at all. Its not found in early government documents. Its found in an obscure letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote to his pastor on HIS beleif in separation, because England forced everyone to be part of the COE. The bill of rights in the constitution, however, does protect citizens from government persecution when expressing religion.

  • @alielbaryeshua Not directly, but it does make it intention clear: no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

    The first amendment was adopted 2 years after the constitution. And during the constitutional convention they slapped down a suggestion for adding a christianity reference.

    Last but not least, most of the founding fathers were deists. Which shows from their writings and in the documents drafted.

  • @CollinMaessen That is incorrect. Deism is the beleif in a supreme architect and creator, and is more philisophocal than anything. Deism also implies that this supreme being does not intervene in human affairs or suspend the natural laws of the universe. Most of the founding fathers beleived in divine providence, or supernatural INTERVENTION. Deists also do not attend organized religion, but most of the founding fathers attended organized christian worship service. wikipedia definition:deism

  • @alielbaryeshua Most books disagree with you on this. Just a few simple searches will give you a list of books and sources on the religious beliefs and positions of the founding fathers. Especially on how this influenced the constitution. So even if the founding father were christian, it doesn't make the U.S. a christian nation.

    For example art. 11 from the treaty of tripoli: As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

  • @CollinMaessen I didnt read ant book. my analysis was based purely off of the founding father's own writtings, their church attendance records, and the wikipedia definition of DEISM. Put purely and simple, my analysis was based off of solid facts, and yours is based off of other peoples interpretations of what THEY beleive the founding fathers were. Every book has an author. And every author has a bais opinion.

  • @alielbaryeshua I see you are now completely ignoring my points about the united states being founded as a secular state. Which I've been presenting to you based on the writings of the founding fathers and other documents/events from that period.

    Also church attendance can be problematic to infer religious positions from. As deists did go to church, it just depends on their deistic position if they did or didn't. bit. ly/9ifF0w

  • @CollinMaessen I didnt ignore your points about your claims that the founding fathers were deists. Its just according to wikipedias definition of deism, the founding fathers could not have possibly been deists. Deists, according to wikipedia, neither prayed to any god nor did they attend religious services. SO unless you would like to present another claim other than deism, like "closet athiests", then perhaps we can continue from there.

  • @alielbaryeshua Read again, I said that you ignored my other points, not my deism points.

    Interesting enough though the wikipedia page you are referring to says the following "The Founding Fathers of the United States were heavily influenced by Enlightenment philosophies, and it is generally believed that many of them were deists."

    And like I said, church attendance is not a good measure for someone being a deist. The wikipedia page also says that deism includes a wide variety of positions.

  • alielbaryeshua, the words "wall of separation" don't occur in the Constitution or amendments. The actual wall of separation , which Tomas Jefferson references in the letter you mention, is in the first amendment.

  • @JustAnotherMutant The point I am trying to prove here, is that the United States government is using this

    " Separation of church and state" law that didnt exist until 1952, to deliberately persecute Jews and Christians that want to publically express their religion. So in turn, we have a government that refuses to allow religion in government, but uses these same laws to RESTRICT/INFRINGE the individeal rights of citizens to religious freedom. ..

  • alielbaryeshua., The law came into effect in 1791, making your point rather invalid. As Thomas Jefferson pointed out, the idea was to stop religious persecution. The example in his letter was that Christians would be unable to use the law to persecute other Christians.

    Seeing as how the law makers are largely Christian, not sure how these laws persecuting 70% of the population got in there. Or what you're talking about.

  • @JustAnotherMutant Thats an absolute lie. Everson Vs. The Board of Education (1947) is the court case that prominent athiests like yourself have used to persecute jews and christians and destroy countless national monuments with christian origins. Like the FFRF that destroyed the 40 foot WWI memorial cross in Utah. Or that school kids are getting expelled for bringing bibles to school. People like you claim that religion is the problem, when it is devoted hatred like yours that truly is.

  • alielbaryeshua, The 1st amendment was ratified in 1791, not 1947 or 1952. However if you're talking about Everson v BoE, that would be the 14th amendment. The 1791 law applied to the federal government, and then in 1868 the 14th extended that wall of separation to the state and local governments as well.

    A memorial that represents one religion ignores the contributions of others, which violates that wall.

    Expelling a student for bringing a Bible would be inappropriate, but please cite case.

  • @JustAnotherMutant Yes. But in the governments pursuit to make all religions equal, they have become the attack dogs for everyone that has reservations about christianity. go to wwwDOTtheblazeDOTcom/stories/b­oy-suspended-for-bringing-bibl­e-to-school-files-suit/ to find the story. And so our government is forcing our kids to participate in islamic rituals, but are denied their basic religous freedoms by a government bent on destroying politically incorrect faiths.

  • alielbaryeshua, in the signonsandiego article on the event, the school claims that he was suspended for preaching in class. If they have a documented history of that, I would side with the school, although I would say they should have made it more clear that the suspension was for disrupting the class, not for his religion.

    If he wasn't preaching during class time (say for example he preached in the classroom before the start of class), the school's action was inappropriate.

    As for the teacher

  • telling him that the separation of church and state prevents a student from bringing the Bible to school, the teacher was incorrect. A teacher has to be careful about bringing a religious book to school, but students have no such restriction. The student is not an agent of the state and is welcome to bring the religious text of choice... as long as they don't disrupt the class they are good to go.

  • @kerryhooks If you want to correct me, please get your centuries right. The pledge was written in 1892, it was _adopted_ by congres in 1942. And the under god was added in 1954.

  • Amen, Wild Bill.

  • @mmarela Amen!!!

  • for God and Country..well said

  • I LOVE YOUR CUP BILL :)

    Amerian exceptionalism is what not only america, but the whole world needs to get back.

    You were once a nation to look up to and adore. These days even your own president dislikes america. :/ Boot this clown out in 2012.

  • @agamimnon423 Says the troll that does not have his channel available.Either you unblock your channel or just shut up.

  • @djmars1983 Wow nice way of dealing with his points. And he has a point with the united states being established with separation of church of state in mind.

    For example, the "under god" in the pledge of allegiance was never part of the original pledge. It was added last century.

  • @agamimnon423

    Please point out from whence you got this nonsense. Better re read the Delaration of Indepenance and the constituion a few more times until you really get the gist of it. No where is "separation of church and state" is mentioned. Only that the Fed. Gov will not endorse a particular religion.

    Wild Bill, please keep up the good work in putting out the truth and facts.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more