Added: 3 years ago
From: sdfkln124
Views: 1,384
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kyl's talking points are just Coleman's lame reasons to justify not conceding. The editorial Kyl referred to was the WSJ which has a huge right wing bias. When ballot totals are different from election night totals, they go with the ticker and totals on election night. Coleman stated before he was losing that the double counting ballot theory has no real credibility. And the only real thing that's stopping Franken from being seated is Norm's stupid lawsuit.

  • yeah but if you were coleman would you step down and be the bigger man i wouldnt

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more