Added: 6 months ago
From: FreeMason34
Views: 132,457
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,435)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It baffles me the sheer ignorance surrounding evolution. There's a mountain of evidence from several different fields that came to the same conclusion, and most of it isn't even the fossil evidence (of which there's still a lot). Jeez people cure your ignorance, read a book or take a biology class.

  • evolution is a big joke, just like maher who is really bozo the clown.

  • Okay for those playing the game at home, evolution is a fact, not fiction. The earliest lines of homo sapiens who split off from the Great Apes and led to the emergence of human beings are documented everywhere on the net for you to see with your own eyes. Fossil evidence is real, and it is documented for your viewing pleasure. If you say you don't believe in evolution when it has been proven for this long right in front of you then you're not just religious, you're straight up fucking stupid.

  • ah don't dern beleeeiiive in no dern monkey trans-for-mashun

  • Lol a white Conservative Christian's only ally on a panel full of white people is the one black guy.. who woulda thought?

  • I am such a big fan on Kim Campbell. Great opinions and always to the point.

  • Punctuated equilibrium, baby!

  • @Enterrapture20 - sorry, Bub, but the KJB says that Jesus isn't coming: Matthew 16:28

  • Anyone who says evolution means humans came from monkeys is so totally ignorant that it is a waste of time talking to him/her. It is like debating the history of the US with someone who insists the Founding Mothers were Jane Seymour, Betty White and Madonna. Oh, and that the War of Interdependence was won in 1875 when the American Colonials crushed the Turks at Tripoli.

  • @subtlemonk I don't know why you're arguing, it is a testable occurrence. Just like the lady in the video said 'bacteria becoming resistant or even immune to anti biotics IS evolution'. However the more complex the organism the time it takes for evolution to occur is increased dramatically, for obvious reasons.

  • @fluffythedestroyer69 I did not say cats evolve into dogs I said monkeys evolving into humans monkeys dont evolve they adapt just like humans we adapt not evolve

  • I know there are people who understand that evolution and athiesm are different things but I think that a lot of religious people are confused because as soon as they hear evolution they think athiesm and completely ignore it, when in fact, evolution and athiesm are two seperate things and evolution is a proven and observable fact and to disregard it is complete ignorance.

  • creationists use things like t.v., gps, and radios everyday ,yet when evolutionists try to use scientific evidence to support a claim, they say science is untrustworthy, oh the hypocrisy.

  • so why havent monkeys evolved

  • @subtlemonk Alright, people like you are starting to piss me off, we didn't come from monkeys, we share a common ancestor, monkeys are evolving, and so are humans, we are two different species of animals, cats don't evolve into dogs, do you get it know?

  • Is it just me or does anybody else's blood pressure go up when they listen to people like Jack Kingston? Just want to slap the fool

  • That evolution happens is fact (HOW exactly it happens is another thing). That this should be debated in the 21st century is both tragic and comical. The USA seems to somehow foster stupidity and I am continually shocked anyone can tolerate such a willfully ignorant society.

  • @BaboonLoveMonkey Thats what happens when you give a moron a loudspeaker. People will listen. They prey on the common person who does not understand evolution even when leading biologist do (for the most part)

  • I don't understand how people who believe in god with no evidence whatsoever can refuse to believe in evolution with all of the evidence there is out there.

  • I'll bet monkeys are embarrassed to share a common ancestor with us. The stupid runs so deep it hurts. We are going away as a nation if this refusal to see the world for what it really is continues much longer.

  • @MarkRosengarten That is a genuine concern...Other nations are putting education as a priority, and we have half our population fighting to go back to the dark ages! China take over the world economy of the 21st Century unless we change fast.

  • This guy believes woman was made from a rib but has trouble with actual scientific evidence. He is eminently unqualified to hold a post of authority of any kind.

  • Didn't the debate on evolution end at least a hundred years ago?

    This is just science deniers being delusional.

    What a joke.

  • @Ryakki Those who understand evolution, believe in it. Those who don't understand it, just make up shit about giants in the sky.

  • @Ryakki Well the debate happens but on the cretionist side still repeats the same things stated up until 100 years ago whilost the evelutionary side finds more and more evidence for evolution...

  • @Ryakki its kinda sad that almost 50% of americans dont believe the real fact of evolution.

  • Anyone who isn't worried about climate change should read "last days of ancient sunlight" the scary thing isn't the warming it's the UNDENIABLE fact that we are running out of fossil fuels at an alarming rate and our entire global system and soceity is run on this energy, no more oil no more tractors, smaller harvest, we fucking STARVE

  • come on, there's gotta be at least one of you guys out there that doesnlt like their job or wishes they were doing something they want to do, and not because they have to do it...??

  • like do any of you evols. ever think about time and space and how much more there could be to life. dont any of you feel that youre living as a slave in this closed matrix we call earth?

  • @rockyraccoon086

    A closed matrix we call earth is a perfect analogy for god and the mindless belief in such a thing.

  • Creation is a myth.

  • LOL How can ANYONE in the 21st Century not believe in science? Send this guy back to the middle ages where his stupidity can be considered normal.

  • we aren't living 100 years ago. you people are watching too many ET shit with movies, tv shows, books. youre all mind controlled, at this point if you disbelieve this youre living in a dream world

  • you evolutionists still don;t believe in some other life force that has visited this planet and helped build our societies. its the 21st century, if you don't believe in ET's something wrong wit u

  • @rockyraccoon086 You really need to stop listening to Richard Hoagland. While it is nearly a mathmatical certainty that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, the vast distances involved make the chances of any visitation here at any time nearly ZERO.

  • @Mozart1220 what makes you say that? what evidence supports your claim? I have provided evidence, not evidence like a photograph of an ET but there is enough evidence to support this...

  • @Mozart1220 its not just hoagland that ive listened too. he is vbery credible though working at the UN and for NASA.... there is enough evidence here on this planet alone that supports...

  • @Mozart1220 this theory. If you look at all ancient civilizations, they all are inter related somehow. starting with the bible, all have a creation story. I do not believe in "God" but...

  • @rockyraccoon086 Just stop it now. You looked like an idiot before, andyou are just digging in deeper.

  • @Mozart1220 but i believe in "god(s)". there are too many pyramids on this planet, not just in egypt, but found all over the world. they are classified as technologies

  • @Mozart1220 all you have to do is connect the dots, and cannot be focused just on one thing such as evolution. if you dont look at every angle you wont understand this trust me.

  • @rockyraccoon086 The problem with you is that you add in "dots" that don't exist. Evolution is about connecting dots that are actually there.

  • @Mozart1220 sure there is, just look for them, i didnt make this stuff up, this was researched and analyzed nu credible scientists. im sorry if this upsets you as an evolutionist

  • "An Atheist debating a creationist is comparable to an astronaut debating a flat earther."

  • @swiftyJ88 Except no-one has shown that the universe is godless and astronauts have seen a round Earth. Sad analogy. Plus evolution does not disprove God's existence. All it would prove is that Genesis 1 is not to be read as literal history.

  • Global warming, Darwinism, and 30 Rock....completely ridiculous concepts.

  • Whar's in your head? Zombie.

  • Comment removed

  • Amazing, people actually go on TV willingly and show the whole world how retarded they are.

  • creationism and evolutionism are both silly. the truth is, we are more powerful and cannot be mind controlled...but apparently........

    remember, science and religion are more closely related than we have been taught....

    you dont' believe this statement, do the research and find out for yourself.

  • @rockyraccoon086 Obviously you don't know anything about either. Science is based on EVIDENCE. Religion is based on MYTH.

  • @Mozart1220 no, you see youre mis informed. NASA is science, which released the images of the pyramids on mars. religion are the oldest history books we have, who are they myths?

  • @rockyraccoon086 NASA didn't realease any photos of pyramids on Mars. Some people THOUGHT they saw them, but it was just low res images of normal mountains. And the Bible is full of myths. Talking snakes, worldwide floods, you name it.

  • @Mozart1220 huh, so where did the photos come from then if NASA didnt release them? who else has a satelite that can take pictures? i thought NASA released them? i

  • @rockyraccoon086 The photos existed, the pyramids didn't. Get it? 

  • @Mozart1220 man, quit kidding yourself. like just think of what is being presented here. pyramids on mars, pyramids on earth, Cairo means "Mars" translated. they found a face up there, that has a high albedo, and none of the other structures around the face is like it. there are too man coincidences. don't have a closed mind and actually think that we are the only ones here, trust me, evolution can be explained not by us evolving from bacteria, but something much more...

  • @rockyraccoon086 - Trolling again, or just sleep-deprived from listening to too much "Coast to Coast" AM radio? Does the crappy, lo-res image from 1976 look like a face? Yup. Google "Jesus dog's butt" to find out how much that means. The 2001 Mars Global Surveyor imaging shows that it's only an eroded Martian mesa. P.S. - there's also no "Man on the Moon" - just craters. If you keep putting crap into your brain from Richard Hoagland, eventually crap will spill out of your mouth.

  • @rockyraccoon086 They didn't find a face, they found a mountain that, in angled lighting and low resolution APPEARED to look like a face. Several higher res photos have shown it to be what it is. A mountain. The alleged "pyramids" are the same. If you see a cloud that looks like a dragon or a sailing ship, is that what it IS? NO. Evolution has been proven for 100 years. There is nothing spiritual about it. And stop bringing up Darwin, apes and missing links. We are 100 years past that.

  • @Mozart1220 man don't be suckered into Darwin, he was a eugenecist, and his theory is broken. if you exclude the pyramids on mars, and lets focus on the ones here on earth, they are ...

  • @rockyraccoon086 I have no idea what you are going on about in your other posts, but then, it's clear you don't either. The Earth is over 4 BILLION years old. That's plenty of time for evolution and plate tectonics, both of which are scientifically proven. There is NO evidence for ANY "god" and NO evidence that ANY person, was ever ressurected from the DEAD.

  • @Mozart1220 lol, calm down buddy. like i said, i deny the "God" in the bible, to think that over one hundred thousand years we evolved and in the last 4,000 years, a neanderthal has...

  • @Mozart1220 more in common with "human" than what we are today. you are caught up in the moment and are only believing one thing, thats not what a scientist does. we look at all angles

  • @Mozart1220 your wrong dude. you don;t even know where you come from or how u came to be? dont be a mis informed evolutionist and side with dawkins just because he has a phd lol

  • @rockyraccoon086 I'm not wrong "dude" and I don't take my facts from a guy that gets his info from the Nat'l Enquirer (Hoagland)

  • @Mozart1220 too bad youre such a closed minded person with no capability to see things the way they shud be intended to see. you are a god yourself. today we can create life...

  • @rockyraccoon086 I am not closed minded, I just rely on actual evidence. I'm done with you now. Go back to the sci-fi channel. I hear they are doing an expose on crop circles.

  • @Mozart1220 you probably watch the sci-fi channel, thats the funny thing ;)

  • @rockyraccoon086 Not for 20 years.

  • @Mozart1220who's to say that some beings didn;t create us 6,000years ago? if youre wondering why i say 6,000 years ago bc that is the first known recorded civilization.have a nice day dude

  • @rockyraccoon086 We already go back millions of years with human ancestry. The Bible is not a science book, it is a fantasy book, so please don't use it as a reference.

  • @kuzumisama why not it tells us how were created? It's very simple actually, think of god as you or me. ok? follow along please...and we make a cell (like we can today), or clone or make a baby just like jesus was made (in vitro insemination), and so whats not to say that we couldnt create humans? if you want evidence of this go look up named Zacharia Sitchen, he has for over 50 years studied the Sumerian culture, they are the ones who have the original genesis story, not christianit

  • @kuzumisama and they describe how their "gods" biologically engineered them. Further evidence ill provide is a professor at harvard did a study, and found that people 4,000 years ago were more identical to a neanderthal than to us. so what does that tell us? That we are evolving too fast, something happened to us all of a sudden, no way could evolution be that fast at producing us, impossible. And dont be a little bitch and bash me for not providing the name of the prof, ill get it..

  • @kuzumisama and dude, there's nothing you can say about bc even you know this is true, that is if you're educated with history that is...the evidence in irrefutable. just face the fact that we don't originate from this planet, its not scary dude, its called science. you watch too many too programs and movies on this stuff, it brain washes you while you watch it. dont keep thinking this is as good as life gets, just like you bought into dawkins, exactly what they want u to do.

  • @rockyraccoon086 ROCKY.... I do not have conversations with stoners. Please wait until you are clean to post.

  • @rockyraccoon086 just by your grammar alone it's not hard to tell your somewhat unbalanced or at the very least uneducated .What kind of a sentence is "that is if you're educated with history that is."why do you say "that is" twice?what does educated with history mean?here's a hint is you see a red line under the word you just typed it's spelled wrong.It won't help with your grade 2 grammar, but its a start.And who the fuck is "they"do you mean aliens? tell your doctor the meds aren't working

  • @kuzumisama The bible is a history book not a science book.

  • @midnight2u2 Sure it is a history book, albeit a very poor one, and about 2% factual. There was no exodus. There was no resurrection. The whole thing was cobbled together out of several writings by preacher charlatans, in order to control the peasants in the middle ages. The fact that ANY 7 year old knows the difference between a fable and fact, yet adults still think the Bible is anything other than mythology is testament to the poor education some people have received.

  • @midnight2u2 The Bible is not a history book. History requires facts. Is "Gone With the Wind" a history book?

  • @Mozart1220 found everywhere, just in the last decade, we found them off the coast of cuba, and the only way they culd of been above land was pre-glacial ice age (so no earlier than...

  • @Mozart1220 10,000 years ago), so this in itself already disproves evolution. trust me, the info is out there, just think that all these old old history books (the bibles of the world)...

  • @Mozart1220 all tell of something great that happen, don;t be folled either of the "god" that created everything and anything, i dont buy that for a second either. this can be explained..

  • @Mozart1220 scientifically, lots of technologies are identified in the bibles, espcially the hindu bible..sorry for typing small messages but only allows me 188 words each message

  • @rockyraccoon086 Yesm there are technolgies, like hammers and other hand tools. The Egyptians even had primitive surgery and maybe even batteries. But they did NOT have computers or other advanced electronics.

  • @rockyraccoon086 We knkw that we did not evolve FROM apes, we have a common anscetor with them. And there are about 100 "missing links" since Darwin. It's like hanging on to the idea that bleed ing is a good medical practice since "doctors" practiced it 200 years ago. Yes, this is the 21st century. The Bible is a book of MYTHS. Science is based on EVIDENCE. There is no EVIDENCE for any God. Is there other life in the universe? Alomst certainly. Does that even suggest a "Supreme being"? NO.

  • @Mozart1220 Yes, it's the 21st century after the birth of God Incarnate. His Resurrection proves all secularism wrong. Secularists are spiritually blind, it's like trying to explain Mozart to a deaf person

  • @Mozart1220 ...spiritual and intelligent than we know of. God, what is God? today, we can play god, this is the 21st century, not darwinian times. don;t be foled and manipuated by the media, actually connect the dots and see the evidence thats right in front of us. its so elemntary when you think about it, yet we are so caught up in this moment we can "LIFE" that we don;t have to figure out who we are where we came from. there is no missing link between us and apes, there no evidence

  • @rockyraccoon086 - If by "no evidence" you mean piles of DNA and fossil evidence, then, I guess so. But, you're right - there is no missing link. "Missing Link" is a creationist fiction that no evolutionist accepts. Just as there is no "missing link" between you at age 6 and you at age 16. So where's your missing link? Age 10? But what about the missing links between age 10 and 6 or age 10 and 16? That game goes on forever.

  • @47f0 i really wish i could debate with you, but when your evidence is "piles of DNA and fossil evidence", what does that tell me? NOTHING, of now, let me expand your viewpoints there on DNA since you probably don;t know shit about it, which I'm sure im right. the thing about DNA, how is it if we came from monkeys, they have 48 chroms and we have only 46...so if we came from monkeys, where did those 2 other chroms go?? they just fuse and that was it? and fossil records....lol

  • @47f0 see, all you evolutionists are good at doing is bashing everyone else that supports and has evidence. unlike you where your ignorant and cant accept the fact that youre wrong. I know it hurts to be wrong since all u evolutionists are  dickheads. but dont lecture me on fossils. wtf do they tell us? that every 26,000 years something changes in the fossil record, did you even know this? look it up if u don;t believe me, you evolutionist piece of shit

  • @47f0 keep thinking you evolved from bacteria, you really are retarded aren't you? just like your pal dawkinds there. not only are you uneducated on this subject but your really good at...

  • @47f0 following someone without even knowing what bullshit your listening too. your one of those people  who can easily be lured somewhere with piece of candy aren't you ;)

  • @Mozart1220 There are thousands of "pyramid photos" both on Mars and the Earth. It is a common geological phenomenon whereby a block fractures and tilts. Sorry, no aliens needed. It is kinda cool though.

  • @kuzumisama That's kinda what I was trying to say. To me it's like seeing shapes in the clouds or hearing "messages" when playing music backwards. Your mind wants to bring order to chaos.

  • @Mozart1220 "NASA didn't realease any photos of pyramids on Mars. Some people THOUGHT they saw them". its funny to how u just contradicted yourself ....

  • @rockyraccoon086 I didn't contradict myself. NASA released photos of Mars taken in 1976. People thought they saw pyramids, but they REALLY were just normal rock formations. They claimed to have seen a face as well, but it doesn't mean it was actually there. Just a mountain in angled light and a low res photo.

  • If this was entitled "Bill Maher...Round Earth vs Flat Earth", we would immediately see how ridiculous the debate is. Giving "Intelligent" Design a voice in the debate is like asking a blind man to describe the Mona Lisa

  • OK WHICH ONE SOUNDS MORE CRAZY? BE HONEST, A SINGULARITY CAN HEAT UP AND EXPAND RAPIDLY, FORMING ATOMS,MOLECULES,STARS,GALAXIES­,SOLAR SYSTEMS,PLANETS AND YES LIFE. THE THE LIFE OVER BILLIONS OF YEARS EVOLVES TO ADAPT TO AN EVER CHANGING AND GROWING UNIVERSE...OR THERE IS A BIG INVISIBLE SPACE GOD THAT HAS BEEN THERE FOREVER BUT ONE DAY ABOUT 6000 YEARS AGO GOT BORED AND DECIDED TO TAKE 6 DAYS TO MAKE A PLANET AND CRAFT UP SOME PEOPLE. OH AND HE MADE A TALKING SNAKE..NOW WHICH ONE SOUNDS CRAZY?

  • He makes me want to shoot myself in the head

  • I admire the conservatives that go on this show knowing they'll be surrounded by people with opposing views . I don't admire their repugnant opinions though .

  • @LifeLovin1 et. al. I think that's actually a fair point, but there are viable theories. Check out the book "Life Ascending" by Nick Lane--he has some great ideas on how the first cells came about (metallic bubbles near deep sea vents.) From the perspective of plausability, you have to keep in mind the huge time scales evolution operates on. Even if the creation of the first reproducing "cell" has a one in a trillion chance of occurring, it becomes likely over billions of possible "events."

  • @JLP4444 I'm glad I actually received a level-headed response. Too much hate on here.

    And I do understand your point in regards to how the time frame greatly increases the chances. The premise is similar to the theory that if you hit random keys on a key board long enough you'll eventually get a nice sentence. To test this theory, 5 chimps were put in a small cage with a working keyboard and monitor for a year. Around 50,000 characters were entered. "a" was the only valid word typed.

  • And people wonder why this country is being laughed at throughout the world, It's idiots like Kingston that are making the decisions that effect our daily lives and laws we have to live by when he can't even get his belief in "Magical Religious Dogma" out of his life. We have to "Clean House" and vote for people that can see "Reality".

    Man Made god, Not, god Made Man - Zeus went the way of Myths, so will the current gods and Non-Realistic beliefs see the same fate...

  • Most people who don't "believe in evolution" really doesn't understand it. Do not have an opinion if you're not informed, shut up, read a book and come back with an intelligent argument.

  • Humans didnt come from monkeys for fuck sakes... I wish maher would of corrected him on this.

    Humans, chimps, apes and orangutans evolved from a common ancestor. Monkeys are a whole other branch.

  • if you knew anything about evolution you ewould know you did not indeed come from a monkey biut we have a common ancestor..why do people comment when they have no idea? also the climate guy...agnostic? how can you be when if we are wrong the consequence is THE END OF THE WORLD? surely thats not a real good wager to take even if the odds of climate change were only low..we only have ONE PLANET boofheaad.

  • I like how the old lady strawmaned the creationist's point of view with the fossils were put here garbage because she couldn't refute him if he actually spoke.

  • Well DL Hughley is officially a moron...

  • lmfao could bill maher have found a dumber republican? Or did bush decline the invitation?

  • Evolution is a process that's been occurring for billions of years, and will continue to do so for as long as earth is capable of supporting life. Evolution doesn't give two shits if you believe it or not. Same with gravity, it happens regardless of what we say or do. For anyone denying the mountains and mountains of evidence supporting evolution, well, tough shit. Evolution doesn't care. It doesn't care about you, your god, me, or any of humanities moronic beliefs. Just like gravity.

  • @Defiant47 And if it's not happening, it won't start to happen just because lots of people believe in it.

  • @ReciprocalZeugma Well that's the thing, people don't "believe" in evolution any more than we "believe" in gravity. We have the science to back these things up, so it's accepted as fact. Quite simple really. That's what's cool about science, it's the best process we have to discover how things work. Besides, without it, we'd not have computers, cars, cell phones, internet, TV, weather forecasts, buildings, planes, trains... you name it, the list goes on and on.

  • Anyone who believes in evolution, please explain how the cells that we supposedly came from, came to existence. How were they created and what caused them to be created. All arguments for evolution start after the cells are already created. Please explain how the CELLS were created.

  • @LifeLovin1 Isaac Newton's theory of gravity explained the motions of the planets around the sun precisely, amongst other things. Never did he even attempt to conjecture how the planets and sun were formed initially. Why would he, as his theory dealt with existing objects, not their origin. Ditto, with evolution, in the exact same manner. Do you know anything of the subject of evolution? I can help you, if you REALLY wish ti improve your knowledge.knowledge.Perhaps you are not interested.

  • @derek24hudson You're analogy is worthless. Isaac Newton did not need to know what the origin of the planets is it was irrelevant to him. Evolution, on the other hand directly deals

  • @LifeLovin1 Thank you. I withdraw the generous offer, but fear that we could not have a fruitful dialogue, if your last comment is indicative of your current level of education. Good luck.

  • @derek24hudson Refine the analogy and you're argument might be more effective.

  • @derek24hudson with the origin of life. And I have no need for your tutelage.

  • @LifeLovin1 " All arguments for evolution start after the cells are already created" That's because the T. of Evolution tries to explain what happened to those cells, not how they came to be. It is like asking why the ToE doesn't explain why the Patriots lost the superbowl... it simply does not try to address that. It deals with the diversity of life, not it's origins. The Newton analogy is spot on. Evolution does not need to know where life came from, as long as it is here.

  • @LifeLovin1 Go take a biology course at any community college. It's explained fully there.

  • @LifeLovin1 Explain how cells were created? How about we cut to the chase and start at the "beginning"... how was god created? If one actually exists, that is a FAR more interesting question. Oh, and to answer yours, go check out the website talkorigins, it'll answer anything you want where evolution is concerned.

  • No one asks if you *believe in* gravity, Relativity, or the chair you may be sitting on. Mainly because these are obviously not things sane people have doubts about. To be honest 'Science' does question everything all the time, but the process of biological evolution has more evidence for it than ANY OTHER SCIENCE DISCOVERY!

    And that includes the chair. If evolution is wrong then all other aspects of our science usage is in error, including the science behind this computer and the Internet.

  • People that do not believe in evolution are stupid.

  • Really, DL..you kinda look liek a monkey...

  • Even if climate change is 80% hoax/lie.....a green earth would be an amazing thing for everyone other than big oil fat cats.

  • Comment removed

  • @HoboShotgun1 You are no scientist. 

  • @Mozart1220

    What does it has anything to do with me being a scientist or not? I was talking about the bible. The creationist guy is obviously implying that it's degrading to say humans share an ancestor with apes but, in the bible, It is say that Eve came from Adam's rib. And that's a lot more degrading and absurd than saying humans came from apes.

    (oh and fyi, I am a scientist.)

  • "I believe in adaptation but I don't believe in evolution"

    ...I don't even. Just... what?

  • If you are religious watch the point again that the woman makes about the overuse of antibiotics and how the bloke who doesnt believe in evolution just states "I dont believe creatures crawled out of the sea and became a human being." I am not saying this proves anything. But for Gods sake this is why everyone finds you so fucking annoying. If you are going to argue the exsistence of God dont be so fucking childish accept the facts or come up with a counter argument.

  • The guy with the glasses is getting mind fucked

  • why dont someone take this ass hole out???

  • Comment removed

  • Plus, this lady's explanation of evolution is extremely loose. According to her, the behavior, the physical adaptation, psychological change etc can all be characterized as evolution. Evolution was a term coined BEFORE DARWINISM. They are debating darwinism, not evolution. Evolution is constantly happening, Darwinism is the idea of survival of the fittest. They are mixing the two too broadly and its lame as hell. Lets hear what the expert DL HULEY has to say about it.

  • EVERYONE EVERYONE... LETS HEAR WHAT DL HULEY HAS TO SAY ON THE MATTER, PLEASE, LET THE EXPERT SPEAK!

  • @WoopyGoldbergsHair Fuck DL Hughley. The only comedian I want to hear on this matter is John "Pops" Witherspoon. YEAH BOY!

    P.S. you should have gone with WhoopieGoldbergsEyebrows.

  • @smithcas86 Haha, it reminds me of that Dave Chapelle stand up where he was like, "OMG someone please get Ja Rule on the line so I can make sense of all this!"

    Ill have to check them brows out, i never looked at her for that long

  • there realy is no hope for this planet when scientists find evidence based facts and poeple STILL dont beleive them.i was arguing about this with my father the other day,he doesn't believe in evo,he said to me "would u spit on a altar in a church" i said "NO of course not" he then ses "that must mean you believe in god" i said "no,its out of respect for the poeple that go in there and cry their eyes out and worship it" he assumes that because i have morrals i believe in god which is bullshit

  • @TheBigBoss851 Climate changes, earthquakes, meteorites, etc... It used to be all "God's Work". But nobody (oh well, I take that back, many idiots still believe that) believes this today. The dangerous thing is, that you see the Idiocracy concept become reality in the US. People who are dumb and ignorant are PROUD of being dumb and ignorant and STILL think they know better than scientists. It's like not speaking a word of French and trying to correct their posts. It's insane.

  • @HuntingGoodWill the root of all ignorance is fear.all these people who deny what scientists say are scared to death of what will happen to them when they die.i dont want to be one of those poeple who gets on the internet and insults religous folks BUT u have to stand in awe of these cretins.i know it sounds extreme but the only way this world will change is if a meteor hit us again and put us back to square 1.i have no fear of death,its gonna be the way it was before i was born,thats fine by me

  • The guy with the Southern drawl and red tie gives both monkeys and people a bad name.

  • its like watching rape in progress

  • I always love religious people just simplifying things like "oh sometimes scientists say that, sometimes they say this" while actual scientists work their ass off with incredible experiments and theories upon theories to help make humanity understand its environment, while the religious people do NOTHING for society but institutional social destruction.

  • @nickorization scientists actually do research, run tests, gather information, and draw conclusions based on thorough analysis. religion on the other hand, tells you that a virgin had a baby and if you don't believe it you will be burned in fire for billions of years...??? i would laugh but i'm 35 yrs old.

  • @nickorization typical secularist nonsense. religion and science work together to do good. when both are done properly.

  • @ReciprocalZeugma religion is as necessary to society as rain dancing.

    excuse me that's incorrect.

    Rain dancing never slaughtered millions of people.

  • @nickorization Religion never slaughtered milions of people. People did. They always find a reason to justify doing unmoral things and big ideas (good or bad) are easiest to manipulate with. If there wasnt religion, people would find another reason. Patriotism. Racial and national superiority. Revenge.

    Just blame those who should be blamed, not ideas they hide behind.

  • that's not adaptation that's evolution. its evolution if their dna changes. adaptation if the bacteria just moves somewhere else where the drug cant reach.

  • Why we humans have to believe in Bible or anything else without prove and error in moral consistency. All religious doctrines have abnormal deviations in its core. Atheist Experience is the most watched show on internet regarding religious fallacy. They gave me very good ground to be reasonable with any dogmatic humans.

  • I'll get my science from people with masters degrees in science, not politicians or entertainment personalities.

  • ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

  • SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

  • @Mogley52 Atheism has no book, its just a belief. not a true religion we have no spiritual leaders. There are many forums of atheism. some just believe out right that the concept of god is silly, others would want proof. Yes there is a beginning but God is a theory and so is Zeus, Norse mythology and String theory. Only thing is we can get to manipulate String theory so we can understand it better unlike god. That is the power of science it empowers mankind, the average person.

  • @attackmike what do you mean by "yes there is a beginning", that 'something' came from 'nothing'?

  • NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

  • @Mogley52 Worms don't evolve into human. This isn't Spore or some silly game. The theory is that we all share a common ancestor. From seaborne animals to land base animal the links are there. Amphibians are a good proof. One can ask how does a fish breathe normal air if their vitals are still evolving. The vitals are already in the fish by natural selection

  • APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.