Antigravity Mechanism - http://www.tsiriggakis.gr

[TheSuperComments]

It doesn't make any sense! Anti-gravity wont work on space.

but the animation and concept is out outstanding!

[christos200]

@TheSuperComments the idea behind this concept is to be able to change the vector and magnitude of the G force thus hovering the plane by creating a 9.81m/s^2 acceleration on the Y axis. Now in space is even more efficient because it will infinitely accelerate due to the fact that no frictions occur (empty space, no air). well that's my opinion...

[ufokeny]

wont work cant work

[mangudiaforce]

look there are always new breakthroughs. we ahev found taht electric charges can in effect cause electromagnetic fields that in effect can cause some lift. fact is we are working on just that. our latest breakthrough the electric ion drive. launched in 2009. it been speeding up and wil in all effect go faster than any drive we have used yet. we also are working on electromagnetic gravity drives for use in space

[wstrohm]

The center of mass of a system cannot move unless acted on by a force external to the system. That means no matter how complex movement of masses within a system is, it ain't goin' anywhere, although it might (& probably will) vibrate back & forth. But the center of mass will always stay in the same place.

[AnnotationMultimedia]

I'm not sure- it looks like some kind of giant gyroscope.

[orphanmonkey1]

In the voice of Butthead..." ..and from this, Jiffy Pop was born."

[quosmo1]

looks like a kitchen appliance or a sex toy... undecided on that one.

[21Kamil12]

its "anti-gravity" so how does it work in space when there is no gravity O.o

[matthewakian2]

@21Kamil12 If it gets you away from Earth's gravity, that's all you need, the rest can be done with current technology. But according to other comments here. It doesn't work.

[kayucomanv2]

y nos niveles de radioactividad???

no seran muy elevados???

que proteccion tiene la tripulacion?

[looncraz]

Anti-gravity has been achieved, problem is the ground disagrees...

[psyquizlabor64]

no chance to take a space flying without spinning endless with that shape of wings

[TheKaos90]

Moves the aircraft through the inertia of the engine's parts? i'd been thinking about that for a while now , the optimal thruster for space travel

[7guard8]

Is this even real?!

[frizstyler]

τελικα ειναι αντι-βαρυτητα ή προωθητικο συστημα βασισμενο σε η/μ φαινομενο?

[matturbanowski]

all I can say is... WTF?!!

[doceigen]

No anti-gravity of ANY kind exists... sorry about that boys.

[Goldendragon7377]

The Klingons already invented this shit!

[eastcoaster54]

dude dont give

your awards away

[Hamburgan]

we need power power power power power power power power.......

[kennyd722]

cool vid, I wonder if there will be any breakthroughs in this area. I wonder what we will be doing in 50 years. It sure is awesome to dream about this kind of stuff..

[kren2012]

Weight and balance is all wrong

[anonymouz79]

1 rule u can not under any circumstances break:: to move in any direction, no matter the medium of wich u want to travel trough (water, air, space, whatever) you will need to create a "push" wich is larger then the "pull" of the object you are moving from / trough.

just lifting a weight up and down realy fast wount get u anywhere. and mr. EqualAndFree : ur absolutely right bout ur post there, but specially the 3rd law of motion wich is the most important one.

[anonymouz79]

look at the arms in the beginning of the animation, they do not move in a smoth motion, instead they simply lift and lower the arms, every time the arms go up, they create a downwards force, and when the arms go down they create a upwards force... starting such a mechanism inside any kind of vehicle would shake it to bits... kinda like a normal petrol engine where u remove the counterweights on the crankshaft. immagine the imbalance it creates.

[BlatendCrude]

aaaahh..............That's how it works!

[OriginalJami]

pffffffffffff



[xX1ATS1Xx]

but will? it Blend ??

[matthias2986]

When the arms come back up would they not incur a downward force? I'm trying to see how this eliminates a balance of up and downwards force...

[420Woltar]

@matthias2986 He left half drive shown, spin is in plasma but try reactor get a dam tomohawk cruiser anal wen attempted & patrol of all earth quadrants means when you reach Aquamarine vibratrion frequency and gravitons resonate to weightless flight, you become detected by the patrols-of the elite defense/secuity super advanced plasmasheild fighters thats sensitive drive compensates from the reflections, and when say..theres 100 kraft with permission, then restircted bogie 101 gets vaporized..

[TheSpaceWheel]

Well Antigravity is a popular name. I think that the author, the Professor is showing us that physical Laws can be broken or at least cracked. We have to find a way to conquer the Universe, not each other.

[jmvideo7]

Doesn't work, I already tried this ...

[ramimahdi2]

this machine is not an anti-gravity ... it was stupid from the inventor to call it so. It mainly create a thrust by converting some of the angular momentum into a thrust in one direction. This of it this way, when something is spinning there is a thrust in all directions that cancels each other ... the trick here is that he tricked nature and redirected the angular momentum into a thrust in one direction ... it is ingenious idea .... but they should stop calling it anti-gravity

[heloizyjhenifer]

Why not test it in a physics engine, many 3D animation software provide one.

[TheSaltysack]

fail now ufo dont workk by any moving parts they use tesla waves and sound waves look up john hutchinson

[TheSpaceWheel]

@ xGuest10101; You are right. "One" dimension is just isn't enough.

[xGuest10101]

dont ask stupid question about the plane shape or if with that thing turning inside the spheres could create antigravity conditions! just ask how will it move after the efect of antigravity :) thats the real problem!

[TheSpaceWheel]

BTW Spyros in your animation I would use the Star Wars Destroyer. :)

[TheSpaceWheel]

What do U think about the patent published by PLEWS DENNIS J (Patent US 2008121071). Review his patent and go to very last page.

I believe it definitely works. 

[koolaidman63]

how does it thrust?

[rayluv77]

The germans made this work ,already in 2nd worldwar called Haunebu or vril or the bell. we have this teknology since a long time already but the elite is hidding it from us to keep earning their scary big money from petrol.

[solunasunrise]

@rayluv77 yo but waht you talk about does not look this here ..

[1953Poppa]

Its only an animation you guys.Its got no practical use.I think the future is with tessler coils, and magnetism. Just my opinion.

[smokeordieganja]

I understand the general concept of anti-gravity but, how would you achieve forword propulsion from a circular propulsion device? Wouldn't the energy be incredibly hard to pinpoint in any general direction? let alone with the accuracy needed to safely achieve flight? Also how could you turn at all? From what I saw it could only go up and forword.

[eggman1600]

why would this be anti gravity.. i dont get it.. please help my puny mind figure this out

[jurotech]

Great video and best of luck. I am curious as to why you would still need wings to provide lift for an aircraft that is equipped with an anti-gravity system. Thanks again.

[AchilleasWTH]

So many armchair scientists here.

[mikeoug]

@AchilleasWTH Better than discussing about Olympiakos

[worldspacenews]

Ad-Astra! To The Stars!

In Peace For All Mankind!

International Space Agency, I.S.A.

International Space Administration

[Jagdeepkaler]

type in gift before youtube to enter a contest!!

[novata01]

This will work. No doubt.

[AlexandruBogdan81]

the arms are pointed down, so the force of propulsion is downwards to push on the "ground"... for a real working model ud need short arms as possible and high rpm. im curious about the mechanism, transmission, how will u make those arms spin like that... i have a very similar mechanism in my mind too. the animation is gorgeous btw!

[GAGAN383]

who the power to make a high speed like ufos. the antigravity mechnaism is a god idea, but you most see us all details of it. who you will became the energie for this.

you must see, its a very complicated system to make a antigravity, before you work on planes you must work at home, its a prinicip. you know. my english is very bad sry.

[Time4TruthDOTorg]

Aaaaaand... then you woke up.

[toocoolforu]

Lov the animation, though this gyro won't make a craft fly...

[dewwest]

come  scientist make it a reality....

[TheTrueJBV3737]

@dewwest if they invented it, why would they release it into your little reality?

[pywakett350]

@dewwest even if they did make it a reality it would only be for the elite. You will never see it.

[hackie77]

@dewwest

as a Professional scientist i can tell u that manipulating Gravity is possible. But i think it will take at least a houndred more years. Material science is often the key/problem...

Please Wait ! :D

[Brnolan88]

@hackie77 ur a professional scientist and u cant spell hundred? im callin bull

[Amarx00]

@Brnolan88

I think the ":D" gives the age away as well.. although i dont care about typos, mine are terrible!

[therichardking4242]

@hackie77 If Newton, Eistein, and Stephen Hawking say it can't be done why should we believe yuo?

[Oliver8472]

and to do a warp effect? these mechanism is good only to leave earth...

[caturn88]

Why build it like a plane we have today? It takes of (and presumably lands) vertically, so why the aerodynamic design?

[Shift4chizzle]

@caturn88 exactly lol, if u use antigravity u can go the speed of light even if your craft is the shape of a giraffe or brick even lol, cos using anti gravity is not technically flying cos you dont need the air or wind or anyting for it to work

[QuantumCarl]

Won't work, but this is one bad ass animation!

[oztronix]

@QuantumCarl

If there are 3 gyros (as you see there) it WILL work.

[TheTrueJBV3737]

@QuantumCarl how do you know it wont, have you tried it?

[2129261184]

@TheTrueJBV3737 Its impossible according to Ralativity Theory, happy now?

[EuroSon99]

Lol. Even a Dutch student in his first year of secondary education knows this will never work. It contradicts basic laws of physics. Nice animation though.

[XZQVenus2]

Yes! I had that idea too.

[giorgos10000]

go to the website

[giorgos10000]

Its real ..

[frankensteinmoneymac]

@giorgos10000 Go on....."Its real .."........Stupid?........Poin­tless?......Silly?

So many possiblities on how to end that sentence!

[Julyard]

Its a beautiful animation, and a wonderful looking craft. It reminded me of the the spaceships in the tv series Babylon 5, only sleeker. Its like a hybrid between those, and an romulan warbird.

[2canines]

ehh.. yeah,  that will work... in fact, you can do that with your arms and fly

[RealWheel1]

The assert thatit does not work is completely false. Due to symetry of rotating masses, you recover a force in a single direction and in a single sense whent the masses circulate on a half sphere.

For people which are not expert, I will add that it is O.U engine.

Best Wishes

RealWheel

[2canines]

@RealWheel1 built a working demonstrator and i will believe you. im no engineer but the centrifugal force will try to prevent the arms from going back to the center. also when the arms have that momentum from center swinging up what will prevent them from wanting to continue that trajectory? to me it seems like the material would snap if it tries to change the trajectory that radically 180°. it would be like having that weight bouncing off a wall = energy loss am sure.

Best Wishes you too =)

[RealWheel1]

@2canines

You can review several videos on YouTube. Not only with 2, but 4, 6, 8 rotating masses.

There is no vibration in horizontal plane.

In this demonstration, it is envisaged to change the pointing direction of the resulting force.

This giroscopic motor can drive any terrestrial or spatial vehicle.

I work personnaly on 3 O.U engines. One of them will be built in march 2011 with the help of a British engineer.

Best Wishes

RealWheel

[RealWheel1]

@RealWheel1

I would mean: it is not envisaged to change the pointing direction.

The technical article of Theodoros Tsiriggakis is now edited on my website. I will add some comments in a soon future/

[TheSpaceWheel]

@RealWheel1 It is May now. What luck?