How are they being pressured from the USA when Obama flew over to Copenhagen to sign a deal? With climate gate, more scandals erupting, the whole thing in Copenhagen fell completely apart. So how with Obama pushing for treaty was their pressure from USA to not sign a deal in Copenhagen? Stupidity on your part to stand here and tell me that Obama was not pushing for a signed deal in Copenhagen. Copenhagen fell apart because they could not agree on a amounts of money to give to other nations.
Um, apparently, you didn't read what I wrote. I said, the IPCC, NOT Copenhagen.
Notice that I said they convinced them to water down their REPORT? They put out their report in the Spring of 2008 when George Bush was in office.
But I'm tired of boosting your ratings by commenting on your videos. You keep calling me names even tho I'm respectful to you so you're an asswipe. Furthermore, I didn't rate any of your videos but I'm now going to go rate them all 1 & get my friends to do the same.
So since Dr. Lindzen got $10k 18 years ago you are saying the Professor of Meteorology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Contributing Expert, Cato Institute. Contributing Expert, George C. Marshall Institute. Member, National Academy of Sciences, would spend the next 18 years plus on the same side of an argument?
Lets not count the Billions of dollars Gore has gotten, I'm sure he has no monetary agenda.
ABC News has reported that Singer insists he is not on the payroll of the energy industry, but admits he once received an unsolicited $10,000 from Exxon
So are you suggesting that this person has a conflict of interest is biased? You dont think its strange that most governments around the world live by taxing business? You dont think it strange that co2 taxation is being promoted as a new source of revenue for these governments? You dont think it strange that Al gore is on the board of a company that trades carbon credits? If these guys could trade your tap water on the mercantile exchange, they would and they trying to do the same with co2.
The level of funding for global warming has reached that of cancer research. Private funding from industry for research is only in the millions, not billions. Who do you think paid for those 10,000 people to fly to Poland this week? To stand here and play the trump card on conflict of interest here, then you better talk to Al Gore and those governments that stand to gain billions from a new round of taxation and impose a whole new regime of regulation on industry that they hate so much.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Professor and Director, Atmospheric Science Department, University of Alabama at Huntsville
Alabama State Climatologist. Lead Author, 2001 IPCC TAR.
While he now acknowledges that global warming is real and the human contribution is significant, Christy has been a long-time skeptic who previously argued that satellite climate data do not show a trend toward global warming, and even show cooling in some areas. His findings have been widely disputed.
Bull crap. Ive not seen any study that is credible and thats been reviewed by the nongovernment scientists that shows Christy was wrong. This reminds me the hockey stick graph that was just absolutely destroyed by privateer scientists around the world. Its just absolutely amazing that these people continually engage in dishonest practices. This is not about science anymore, its about politics. Why would you try and support the bad science and dishonest practices these people are engaged in?
Lindzen charged "oil and coal interests $2,500 a day for his consulting services; [and] his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for by Western Fuels and a speech he wrote, entitled 'Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus,' was underwritten by OPEC."
Go ask Gore about his money and what he making out of this venture? Where did he get his 300 million from? Its absolutely remarkable that people like you can only try to throw mud at these peoples character. Watch the above video and see how dishonest and disgusting these science practices are. It is simply rubbish science. Science is not shown that co2 is driving temperature and we had no warming for 10 years. If anything were in its cooling trend right now. Why are these AGW dishonest.
The IPCC has been pressured by the US, China and Brazil (mostly) into reporting that GW won't be as bad as most scientists believe it will be.
Skydancer365 2 years ago
How are they being pressured from the USA when Obama flew over to Copenhagen to sign a deal? With climate gate, more scandals erupting, the whole thing in Copenhagen fell completely apart. So how with Obama pushing for treaty was their pressure from USA to not sign a deal in Copenhagen? Stupidity on your part to stand here and tell me that Obama was not pushing for a signed deal in Copenhagen. Copenhagen fell apart because they could not agree on a amounts of money to give to other nations.
Albertkallal 2 years ago
Um, apparently, you didn't read what I wrote. I said, the IPCC, NOT Copenhagen.
Notice that I said they convinced them to water down their REPORT? They put out their report in the Spring of 2008 when George Bush was in office.
But I'm tired of boosting your ratings by commenting on your videos. You keep calling me names even tho I'm respectful to you so you're an asswipe. Furthermore, I didn't rate any of your videos but I'm now going to go rate them all 1 & get my friends to do the same.
Skydancer365 2 years ago
shameoncanada-- to use a Greenpeace web site says alot about how true it is!!!!
camcheck 2 years ago
So since Dr. Lindzen got $10k 18 years ago you are saying the Professor of Meteorology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Contributing Expert, Cato Institute. Contributing Expert, George C. Marshall Institute. Member, National Academy of Sciences, would spend the next 18 years plus on the same side of an argument?
Lets not count the Billions of dollars Gore has gotten, I'm sure he has no monetary agenda.
Brantoc 2 years ago 4
Greenpeace had created there exxonsecret site for let people stay in there mindcontrol, so greenpeace and the WWF wouldnt loose there major income.
there is no evidance that they got money from oilcompanies.
if there is, please send me.
and even if they got the money, it is still the truth that they are saying.
google video: "global warming or global governance" and "the obama deception" for the reason why.
or youtube "the real inconvient truth"
BennoToorn 3 years ago
Professor Fredrick Singer
ABC News has reported that Singer insists he is not on the payroll of the energy industry, but admits he once received an unsolicited $10,000 from Exxon
wiki
shameoncanada 3 years ago
So are you suggesting that this person has a conflict of interest is biased? You dont think its strange that most governments around the world live by taxing business? You dont think it strange that co2 taxation is being promoted as a new source of revenue for these governments? You dont think it strange that Al gore is on the board of a company that trades carbon credits? If these guys could trade your tap water on the mercantile exchange, they would and they trying to do the same with co2.
Albertkallal 3 years ago
The level of funding for global warming has reached that of cancer research. Private funding from industry for research is only in the millions, not billions. Who do you think paid for those 10,000 people to fly to Poland this week? To stand here and play the trump card on conflict of interest here, then you better talk to Al Gore and those governments that stand to gain billions from a new round of taxation and impose a whole new regime of regulation on industry that they hate so much.
Albertkallal 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Professor and Director, Atmospheric Science Department, University of Alabama at Huntsville
Alabama State Climatologist. Lead Author, 2001 IPCC TAR.
While he now acknowledges that global warming is real and the human contribution is significant, Christy has been a long-time skeptic who previously argued that satellite climate data do not show a trend toward global warming, and even show cooling in some areas. His findings have been widely disputed.
exxonfactsheet
shameoncanada 3 years ago
Bull crap. Ive not seen any study that is credible and thats been reviewed by the nongovernment scientists that shows Christy was wrong. This reminds me the hockey stick graph that was just absolutely destroyed by privateer scientists around the world. Its just absolutely amazing that these people continually engage in dishonest practices. This is not about science anymore, its about politics. Why would you try and support the bad science and dishonest practices these people are engaged in?
Albertkallal 3 years ago
Lindzen charged "oil and coal interests $2,500 a day for his consulting services; [and] his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for by Western Fuels and a speech he wrote, entitled 'Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus,' was underwritten by OPEC."
wiki
shameoncanada 3 years ago
Go ask Gore about his money and what he making out of this venture? Where did he get his 300 million from? Its absolutely remarkable that people like you can only try to throw mud at these peoples character. Watch the above video and see how dishonest and disgusting these science practices are. It is simply rubbish science. Science is not shown that co2 is driving temperature and we had no warming for 10 years. If anything were in its cooling trend right now. Why are these AGW dishonest.
Albertkallal 3 years ago