America is the biggest terrorist state in the world. Iran do not attack any county 500 years.
After Attack Iran American Army will fuck Iranian girls by making another Abu Garib.
US attack Iraq to get rid of the dictator of Sadam Hussian. What Happen later million of civilian dies , thousand of girls rape and satisfy sexual sick desire. What can you expect from them.
Otherwise second Iraq colonization comes to Iran.
Obama said there will be permanent US base Iraq (Oil Security).
No, Europe actually pays a lot (!) more to the UN than the US, but is divided and less aggressive, so you don't see the influence...
However the majority of the countries are for instance the group77, so the UN certainly is not an US tool. In contrary, the US does not really care much about the UN and prefers to decide for itself, while Russia, China, India, Brazil, Germany, France want to reform the UN and really support it
I hope Russia does not join this corrupted NATO. Not only is NATO controlled by the American government, as well as the UN, the WHO and in the end... the EU.
Russia seems to have more freedoms than America, they can resist unlawlful arrest in Russia. america has its Patriot Act. America's prisons are filling up with dissidents and political prisoners of all sorts.
In the end, I do hope the ASDE and EDA join hands soon and fill in the gap where NATO is lacking. The EU ought to redefine its interests in NATO beyond 'hard power' and in the interest of finding its own special capabilities. The CSTO and NATO will have to face slimming-down. It has already come this far that the OSCE president is bashing the EDA and claim it to be stripping away the OSCE 'working ground'... How about an opt-in for committed member states for a renewed European security pact?
Man Russians never liked to become cock suckers. Russians fucked everyone who looked towards Russia, Soviet Union collapsed because of a dumb old fuck Mikhail Gorbachev
Senior US intel says if dollar dumping occurs, the high inflation may cause a US civil war which could personally threaten the billionaires and their assets.
To counter this, as the theory says, that certain US billionaires will try to get other countries to start a World War, to shift public attention away from America's internal economic problems.
These billionaires would subvert other countries into going to war against each other, like India vs Pakistan, or Iran vs Israel.
And you know just two stages - good and bad - and nothing in between? Only black and white colors, yeah?
And you forgot to say, that Russia and USSR wasn't empire in classical meaning. There was no colonialism, but our western friends, being no more empires (such as UK), still provides colonial policy - neo-colonialism.
Seriously. Russia (and the USSR) WAS NEVER an Empire? And never inflicted pain or damage on it's neighbours, or the world! C'mon. That's enough historical revisionism.
NATO was created to defend western Europe against the Soviet Empire invading it after world war 2. For sure, NATO isn't always perfect- but you're Russian and critisising it, after your own history? Please.
>Seriously. Russia (and the USSR) WAS NEVER an Empire?
Why wasn't? Was! And still is! But it is another form, NON-colonial empire. Just compare countries and life level before english colonialism (it is closer for you, because u r from UK) and before russian one. UK - robbing resources, Russia - building culture infrustructure, UK - holding local people and even nobility as servants, Russia - local nobility have had the same status as rus. nobility, etc...
>Why is RT behaving like Fox News. Just wondering.
Speaking on broken english (so called "american" english)? It is their western branch. If you wish, you can watch arabic version. - rtarabic . com. :-D
NATO is a criminal organization, an agressive tool for attacking, robbing and opressing sovereign countries of this world.
It is under direct control of United States administration which is under the direct control of international banking cabal aka FED. European governments enjoying this obscure organization are nothing more than notorious kissers of American an Israeli arses and are equally responsible for the destruction of international relationships and good will.
Any politician would sell this countries interests to the international criminals if the offer is high enough.
Why do you think that they can be so easily talked into accepting US and NATO bullshit ? Many of them know that things aren't supposed to be like this, but they keep their mouths shut as long as they get their shares.
I'm always amazed how NATO countries send troops to die without a single blink of an eye...
What theories? And why conspiracy = crap? And why conspiracy? Just imagine - the US gov-t secretly trades new weapons to Saudi Arabia (just for example) and then sponsors terrorist in Russia (for example) on these money. Looks as conspiracy? But not more, than so called "Irangate" (or Iran-Contras affair). Answer, why it is conspiracy, it is ordinary actions for western governments. Remember french corsairs and english privateers on His/Her Majesty service and Siiir Francis Drake personally. :-)
Id rather have NATO and American military forces bogged down in Afghanistan that will have make them commit much more troops and money, I'm not against the NATO operation but I don't sympathize with them the resources they lose,
The USA should build a shield to protect its border with Mexico. Millions of Mexicans cross the border every day and destroyed the South Western cities like Los Angeles. A US soldier would not last a minute walking through a latino neighborhood in Los Angeles carrying a sign that says "Proud to be a Gringo"
If only Russia would show take an active part in making the world a better place, instead of sitting on the sidelines critizing what Nato is doing wrong. Russia doesnt help with problems concerning North Korea, Iran, or Afghanistan. So I'd say before critizing Nato, EU, USA, look at yourselfs first.
You're undoubtedly one of the most ignorant fucks on this planet. Do you have any clue of Russia's role in N Korea? Clearly not. So STFU you gutless yankee sack of SHIT, because your comments are the empty gobshite of a true know-nothing jerkoff Nazi.
Russia doesn't help in Afganistan, lucaboris? Are you kidding? Russia allows America to transport arms through it's territory, which is a major help. And Russia is helping A LOT in negociations with Iran. It helps to maintain a reasonable approach to solving the problem, instead of starting another unlawful war, like in Iraq.
Are you kidding me? Russia's attempted to veto any sanctions against the Iranian regime- even when it was murdering it's own citizens for protesting, all while the Iranian regime stated they want to 'wipe Israel of the map' and tried to hide their nuclear technology from the rest of the world. The only REASON Russia has done this is because they are supplying the nuclear technology and development to Iran- for profit. Iraq was a fucking joke, but don't be pretending Russia is ANYTHING but great.
Surely you know, that Russia has agreed to join the sanctions, but only as a last resoet, if all the reasonning fails. And that is the right approach, instead of jumping into the war with two feet and then think, like in Iraq. It's not a question of being "anything but geat", it's just a question of common sense.
I do know that- that's a fair answer. However Russia wasn't helping until it had no choice anymore- ie after the second secret plant was found recently that the Iranians had been hiding. We all know that Russia is supplying materials for and helping the Iranians with nuclear development. The reason Russia hasn't been particularly helpful is for it's own economic reasons. I do agree that just jumping into war is totally the wrong approach though. None of the EU countries want that.
MrDragon, actually you are wrong - Medvedev was saying it for quite a while (watch his interview with CNN months ago). As for "we all know Russia is supplying meterials..." Who are we? I don't know that. Certainly Russia is not helping the Iranians with a military nuclear development . Just think - what would Russia gain from arming the Islamic neighbour? It has enough of muslim militants inside Russia to deal with. I think your perception of Russia is too suspicious and cold war orientated.
It all doesn't matter really, because biblical scripture says the luciferarian agenda will come to past, no matter what ANYBODY can do. So, the question I ask everyone that wants, needs, or follows this new age utopia. "IS YOUR SOUL WORTH..........42MONTHS?
America can't even win a simple guerrilla war! Little alone against Russia. Maybe it is because it hasn't really fought a serious war in it's history as a country.
Beleive me, when USA will stop create constant "global threats" to people, economic crisises, man-made viruses, propaganda media and films, "global warming"hoaxes, local conflicts for resources, rewriting of history,... and stop supporting terrorists, I will stop. But now it's impossible. Too many troubles USA created for humanity. Too many tragedies and dead civillians... USA is a main threat to our stability.
of course NATO is under America's thumb... it was created specifically to protect the U.S. (and its interests in Europe) from the USSR. Just as the Warsaw Pact was created to do the same for mother Russia. this is perhaps the biggest "duh" video of all time
> it was created specifically to protect the U.S. (and its interests in Europe) from the USSR.
Not to protect US, but to attack USSR. There were over 10 plans of nuclear devastation of the Union ("Dropshot" "Broiler", "Frolic" etc) before the Union created its own nuclear bomb. And NATO was created before OVD (Warsaw Treaty org.), so make conclusions.
America should never gone into Iraq or Afghanistan. 9/11 should have been investigated and then Americans would have saw the battle is here in the states. Corruption is everywhere.
We need to show our allegiance to the US not to the UN, NATO or AIPAC! NATO is used so the US doesn't get blamed for dropping humanitarian bombs.
TheNova1960 1 month ago
a fact is that America is increasingly losing its grip on the Nato
Grayburn84 10 months ago
Amasing story and Very educational for Amerikanese kids!
AlexandervsSasha 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America is the biggest terrorist state in the world. Iran do not attack any county 500 years.
After Attack Iran American Army will fuck Iranian girls by making another Abu Garib.
US attack Iraq to get rid of the dictator of Sadam Hussian. What Happen later million of civilian dies , thousand of girls rape and satisfy sexual sick desire. What can you expect from them.
Otherwise second Iraq colonization comes to Iran.
Obama said there will be permanent US base Iraq (Oil Security).
MonsterIsrael 1 year ago
Is that is a surprising fact that NATO is actually an American bitch like UN?
US funds UN and UN in return sleeps and sucks US cock.
Whatever is the US policy becomes UN resolution.
NATO is an old bitch now
01captjack 2 years ago
No, Europe actually pays a lot (!) more to the UN than the US, but is divided and less aggressive, so you don't see the influence...
However the majority of the countries are for instance the group77, so the UN certainly is not an US tool. In contrary, the US does not really care much about the UN and prefers to decide for itself, while Russia, China, India, Brazil, Germany, France want to reform the UN and really support it
AustrianAtheist 1 year ago
I hope Russia does not join this corrupted NATO. Not only is NATO controlled by the American government, as well as the UN, the WHO and in the end... the EU.
Russia seems to have more freedoms than America, they can resist unlawlful arrest in Russia. america has its Patriot Act. America's prisons are filling up with dissidents and political prisoners of all sorts.
aldona99 2 years ago
In the end, I do hope the ASDE and EDA join hands soon and fill in the gap where NATO is lacking. The EU ought to redefine its interests in NATO beyond 'hard power' and in the interest of finding its own special capabilities. The CSTO and NATO will have to face slimming-down. It has already come this far that the OSCE president is bashing the EDA and claim it to be stripping away the OSCE 'working ground'... How about an opt-in for committed member states for a renewed European security pact?
CutterScene 2 years ago
@aldona99
Man Russians never liked to become cock suckers. Russians fucked everyone who looked towards Russia, Soviet Union collapsed because of a dumb old fuck Mikhail Gorbachev
01captjack 2 years ago
Senior US intel says if dollar dumping occurs, the high inflation may cause a US civil war which could personally threaten the billionaires and their assets.
To counter this, as the theory says, that certain US billionaires will try to get other countries to start a World War, to shift public attention away from America's internal economic problems.
These billionaires would subvert other countries into going to war against each other, like India vs Pakistan, or Iran vs Israel.
Rockguitarnow 2 years ago
>...the world was perfect before America existed?
And you know just two stages - good and bad - and nothing in between? Only black and white colors, yeah?
And you forgot to say, that Russia and USSR wasn't empire in classical meaning. There was no colonialism, but our western friends, being no more empires (such as UK), still provides colonial policy - neo-colonialism.
Nitrorus 2 years ago
@Nitrorus
Seriously. Russia (and the USSR) WAS NEVER an Empire? And never inflicted pain or damage on it's neighbours, or the world! C'mon. That's enough historical revisionism.
NATO was created to defend western Europe against the Soviet Empire invading it after world war 2. For sure, NATO isn't always perfect- but you're Russian and critisising it, after your own history? Please.
MrDragon1968 2 years ago
>Seriously. Russia (and the USSR) WAS NEVER an Empire?
Why wasn't? Was! And still is! But it is another form, NON-colonial empire. Just compare countries and life level before english colonialism (it is closer for you, because u r from UK) and before russian one. UK - robbing resources, Russia - building culture infrustructure, UK - holding local people and even nobility as servants, Russia - local nobility have had the same status as rus. nobility, etc...
Nitrorus 2 years ago
Up untill the election of Sarkzoy, France always maintained its Independence from NATO that was one of the main aims of Gaullist France.
ProsperityGlobal 2 years ago 2
Why is RT behaving like Fox News. Just wondering.
texas224 2 years ago
@texas224
You got it there Bro. I've often thought the same thing myself.
Of course, RT also happens to be run by the Russian Government- which makes it AMAZINGLY impartial ;-)
MrDragon1968 2 years ago
>Why is RT behaving like Fox News. Just wondering.
Speaking on broken english (so called "american" english)? It is their western branch. If you wish, you can watch arabic version. - rtarabic . com. :-D
Nitrorus 2 years ago
NATO is a criminal organization, an agressive tool for attacking, robbing and opressing sovereign countries of this world.
It is under direct control of United States administration which is under the direct control of international banking cabal aka FED. European governments enjoying this obscure organization are nothing more than notorious kissers of American an Israeli arses and are equally responsible for the destruction of international relationships and good will.
SvrchovaneCechy 2 years ago 4
and nobody is doing anything about u fail
goddifist 2 years ago
Yeah, they are kissers for only one reason: MONEY
Any politician would sell this countries interests to the international criminals if the offer is high enough.
Why do you think that they can be so easily talked into accepting US and NATO bullshit ? Many of them know that things aren't supposed to be like this, but they keep their mouths shut as long as they get their shares.
I'm always amazed how NATO countries send troops to die without a single blink of an eye...
LVader20 2 years ago
what a wondefit idea
lookforme2012 2 years ago
flop
lookforme2012 2 years ago
so what?
labartic 2 years ago
one step closer to the new world order
thrashkill666 2 years ago
I find it sad and worrying, that such silly comments advocating ridiculous conspiracy theories get the thumbs up treatment. Grow up people.
azz578 2 years ago 3
What theories? And why conspiracy = crap? And why conspiracy? Just imagine - the US gov-t secretly trades new weapons to Saudi Arabia (just for example) and then sponsors terrorist in Russia (for example) on these money. Looks as conspiracy? But not more, than so called "Irangate" (or Iran-Contras affair). Answer, why it is conspiracy, it is ordinary actions for western governments. Remember french corsairs and english privateers on His/Her Majesty service and Siiir Francis Drake personally. :-)
Nitrorus 2 years ago
Id rather have NATO and American military forces bogged down in Afghanistan that will have make them commit much more troops and money, I'm not against the NATO operation but I don't sympathize with them the resources they lose,
MikeCT17 2 years ago
The USA should build a shield to protect its border with Mexico. Millions of Mexicans cross the border every day and destroyed the South Western cities like Los Angeles. A US soldier would not last a minute walking through a latino neighborhood in Los Angeles carrying a sign that says "Proud to be a Gringo"
ComradePatriot 2 years ago
If only Russia would show take an active part in making the world a better place, instead of sitting on the sidelines critizing what Nato is doing wrong. Russia doesnt help with problems concerning North Korea, Iran, or Afghanistan. So I'd say before critizing Nato, EU, USA, look at yourselfs first.
lucaboris 2 years ago
@lucaboris
Hear hear.
I agree.
MrDragon1968 2 years ago
You're undoubtedly one of the most ignorant fucks on this planet. Do you have any clue of Russia's role in N Korea? Clearly not. So STFU you gutless yankee sack of SHIT, because your comments are the empty gobshite of a true know-nothing jerkoff Nazi.
MoscowMaestro 2 years ago
Russia doesn't help in Afganistan, lucaboris? Are you kidding? Russia allows America to transport arms through it's territory, which is a major help. And Russia is helping A LOT in negociations with Iran. It helps to maintain a reasonable approach to solving the problem, instead of starting another unlawful war, like in Iraq.
natlissits 2 years ago 3
Are you kidding me? Russia's attempted to veto any sanctions against the Iranian regime- even when it was murdering it's own citizens for protesting, all while the Iranian regime stated they want to 'wipe Israel of the map' and tried to hide their nuclear technology from the rest of the world. The only REASON Russia has done this is because they are supplying the nuclear technology and development to Iran- for profit. Iraq was a fucking joke, but don't be pretending Russia is ANYTHING but great.
MrDragon1968 2 years ago
@MrDragon1968
CORRECTION. NOT great.
MrDragon1968 2 years ago
Surely you know, that Russia has agreed to join the sanctions, but only as a last resoet, if all the reasonning fails. And that is the right approach, instead of jumping into the war with two feet and then think, like in Iraq. It's not a question of being "anything but geat", it's just a question of common sense.
natlissits 2 years ago
last resort*
natlissits 2 years ago
@natlissits
I do know that- that's a fair answer. However Russia wasn't helping until it had no choice anymore- ie after the second secret plant was found recently that the Iranians had been hiding. We all know that Russia is supplying materials for and helping the Iranians with nuclear development. The reason Russia hasn't been particularly helpful is for it's own economic reasons. I do agree that just jumping into war is totally the wrong approach though. None of the EU countries want that.
MrDragon1968 2 years ago
MrDragon, actually you are wrong - Medvedev was saying it for quite a while (watch his interview with CNN months ago). As for "we all know Russia is supplying meterials..." Who are we? I don't know that. Certainly Russia is not helping the Iranians with a military nuclear development . Just think - what would Russia gain from arming the Islamic neighbour? It has enough of muslim militants inside Russia to deal with. I think your perception of Russia is too suspicious and cold war orientated.
natlissits 2 years ago
It all doesn't matter really, because biblical scripture says the luciferarian agenda will come to past, no matter what ANYBODY can do. So, the question I ask everyone that wants, needs, or follows this new age utopia. "IS YOUR SOUL WORTH..........42MONTHS?
Frazior 2 years ago
the anti missile should be controlled by the UN, that way if a nuclear war brakes out the EU doesn't have to worry about trusting the USA
maticoff 2 years ago
Bye Bye Poland!
mokdadmm 2 years ago
Comment removed
mokdadmm 2 years ago
NATO is a threat to world stability. Just as USA.
igorvasilevsky 2 years ago 2
Hi Igor, thought you'd be here.
Go climb back into your vodka bottle before my country totally destroys yours? Kbyethx
69QuIzAcK69 2 years ago
America can't even win a simple guerrilla war! Little alone against Russia. Maybe it is because it hasn't really fought a serious war in it's history as a country.
RFXCGZZ 2 years ago 2
Yeah, I heard Russia went there first... how's that working out for you Igor? Hmm?
I'm not for the war, I think it's criminal. I just can't stand igor posting anti american crap on every video.
69QuIzAcK69 2 years ago
Beleive me, when USA will stop create constant "global threats" to people, economic crisises, man-made viruses, propaganda media and films, "global warming"hoaxes, local conflicts for resources, rewriting of history,... and stop supporting terrorists, I will stop. But now it's impossible. Too many troubles USA created for humanity. Too many tragedies and dead civillians... USA is a main threat to our stability.
igorvasilevsky 2 years ago 4
@69QuIzAcK69 I couldn't have said it better-
PERIZ99 2 years ago
Theres no need to get rude. I am American myself.
Russia never invaded Afghanistan, the USSR did, and it lost because of financial reasons.
Please educate yourself before making such remarks.
RFXCGZZ 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
shockolanu 2 years ago
of course NATO is under America's thumb... it was created specifically to protect the U.S. (and its interests in Europe) from the USSR. Just as the Warsaw Pact was created to do the same for mother Russia. this is perhaps the biggest "duh" video of all time
Craigipedia 2 years ago 7
> it was created specifically to protect the U.S. (and its interests in Europe) from the USSR.
Not to protect US, but to attack USSR. There were over 10 plans of nuclear devastation of the Union ("Dropshot" "Broiler", "Frolic" etc) before the Union created its own nuclear bomb. And NATO was created before OVD (Warsaw Treaty org.), so make conclusions.
Nitrorus 2 years ago
ya nato is a total creation of the international bankers
RunsWitGuns 2 years ago 9
NATO under America's thumb? More like they are both pawns of the global elite.
bandaidmafia 2 years ago 12
Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
America should never gone into Iraq or Afghanistan. 9/11 should have been investigated and then Americans would have saw the battle is here in the states. Corruption is everywhere.
Whorulesnow 2 years ago 15
Nobel Peace Price! ahahahaha!
fashionxue 2 years ago 8