Excellent... I was beginning to think that geerup was never going to produce coherent thoughts, I see now he only needed a little help organizing his statements...
At least he isn't deleting everything that disagrees with him. To my mind, that is the worst aspect of some of these fundamentalists. They claim no one can present counter evidence and then delete anyone who does.
Well, he hasn't ripped off any children's hospitals, so I'd say I do like him much better. He also doesn't censor comments, and he responds to arguments against him. He has his faults, but he's definitely got PCS1 beat.
You don't even need fair use. By uploading a video to YT you pass the ownership of it to YT; YT is OK with videos that belong to them being used on YT except for cyber bullying which is clearly not the case here.
So yeah, use Geerups videos as much as you like, for he doesn't even own them. =D (overlyhappyface)
GEERUP strikes me as an unstable, immature, poorly educated individual,constantly isolated and in desperate need of attention...wait ...i get the VFX2 moniker now, lolololo
gnosticism/agnosticism is to beleive / not beleive in god, theism / atheism is to know /know there is not a god. the difference is the a/gnostic is going to quantify his statement with "I could be wrong but..." before going on about whether or not god exists.
Not all Atheists, like myself, do not claim to KNOW there is no god. I simply believe there is no god. I suppose that makes me an Agnostic Atheist...right?
This is where BELIEF kicks in based on evidence AND what is mostly likely to be true. If you BELIEVE god does not exist...you are an Atheist. If you KNOW god doesn't exist, you are an Atheist. I would love to see the evidence for ANYONE who KNOWS. I think the claim of absolute knowledge, is absolutely ignorant! HA!
I think you misunderstand the meaning. I BELIEVE there is NO god. What does that make me? Any lack of belief make me an atheist. Most agnostics claim to have no position or are simply "neutral" on the subject because they believe god is unknowable.
I have dived in. I disagree. Atheism is not a claim of knowledge. Now there are LEVELS of Atheism. The matter could get confusing.
You've got your definitions backwards. Theism/Atheism is the belief or non belief in a deity. Gnosticism and Agnosticism are the ones concerning your knowledge of such events. Gnostic and Agnostic are QUALIFIERS for theism and atheism. Most atheists are "agnostic atheists". Fundamentalists are gnostic theists.
LOL! I was joking! Honestly I can't believe you fell for that... Seriously, I know Agnosticism can be several things: You have been told several things from various religions, and not sure what to believe, so you just choose to not know.
Incorrect. That is contradictory. You cannot accept evolution and at the same time attempt to reconcile it with christian beliefs (which is contradicts completely) and be called logical and rational.
"just because you believe in some supernatural being doesn't mean that you can't understand the natural world" You don't get to be a deist and ignore large portions of the bible and still call yourself a christian. That is entirely what is WRONG with most christians. You either FOLLOW THE BIBLE or YOU ARE NOT CHRISTIAN. You don't get to say "well I believe in jesus and his ideas but not most of the bible so im christian". NO. You are NOT. The very book you read from says you cannot do that.
Your definition of being a Christian differs greatly from mine, apparently. I'm sorry that you can't see that inclusion into one group does not mean exclusion from the other.
I don't recall anywhere in the Bible instructions from Jesus or God that all true Christians be intentionally ignorant of the world around them. Perhaps I just missed it - - do you have a verse # handy?
Its not "my definition of a christian". Its the bibles definition. You are ignoring your own doctrines definition. That would be like me saying "im an atheist but I believe in god". It makes no sense. The creation story is in direct contradiction to evolution. Which is correct, the bible, or evolution? You can't have both. Don't believe the creation story? So then the bible is wrong? So then why is any of it right and how do you know which parts?
"Chapter and verse?" Christian=one who accepts christ as lord. Christs words and story are written in the bible, specifically the new testament. Thereby, the NT must be true if you are a christian. The NT is a followup of the OT. One cannot exist without the other Christ even refers to it and says he is not here to change the old laws. Christians must accept the OT as true as well for the NT to be valid. Evolution disagrees with the OT. The bible itself says that it is the word of god.
I don't know - I am aware of several people who claim to be Christians and also boast a pretty descent scientific understanding of evolutionary theory. Perhaps you should get in touch with somebody like Donexodus2 or Ken Miller (Prof. Bio @ Brown) to figure out where you are mistaken.
Or more amusingly, perhaps you can tell them where they are mistaken!
I've already told donexodus where he was mistaken and I'd tell ken miller if I ever met him. I don't see how this is relevant. Just calling yourself something doesn't make you that something. Ignoring large parts of the bible because it doesn't fit the evidence *invalidates* the bible. If large parts of it are wrong, then there is no way to determine which parts are right, thereby, the entire book is invalid.
so now you are the barometer against which all people much measure their worth?
if you ran into the Pope, would you let him know that he is wrong too?
being a Christian is more than reading a book and shutting down your entire brain...after all if your god gave us a brain with such incredible capabilities, would it not be a sin to waste it?
your opinion of a black and white world is not realistic and I think you will find that very few people consider it a valid position.
"the barometer against which all people much measure their worth?" Your strawman is not boring me. I never once discussed peoples WORTH, only their belief. Your belief is in no way tied to your worth as a human being.
"your opinion of a black and white world is not realistic "
Thats just absurd. I do not believe in a black and white world. *Some things*, however, are black and white. You have the right to believe anything you want. Any one of these "gambits of belief" as you say, but unless you are specific in your beliefs, you don't get to do so while still calling yourself christian. You never address my point; instead you post nonsense. Could I say I am an atheist who believes in god?
"if you ran into the Pope, would you let him know that he is wrong too?" Without question. Yes, yes I would. "being a Christian is more than reading a book and shutting down your entire brain..." I find that ironic. In order to believe the stories in the bible weighed against the scientific evidence you would *have to shut down your brain* and ignore everything you see. So apparently yes, god wants you to do that. Anything else is a baseless rationalization.
You don't let Christians define what "atheist" means to you, and at the same time, you don't define who is a "true Christian" and who isn't.
I don't know about you, but I care a lot more with how a person conducts themselves and interacts with others than what label they embrace (or don't embrace).
"You don't let Christians define what "atheist" means to you, and at the " I'd think you of all people would know better. Being "atheist" doesn't mean anything to me other than how it is defined. If a said i was an atheist but I also believed in a higher power than a christian would have every right to call BS on my incorrect use of the term just as I call BS on there incorrect use of the term. You don't just get to take already defined words and then make up definitions for them.
"If you do that, doesn't it prove that you know that stuff in the bible is wrong and immoral? " Yes, absolutely. It proves that your morals do not come from the bible and logically invalidates the entire document as (I have said before), if one cannot determine which parts are true and which are not, then the entire document is meaningless.
You dont know what Agnostic is. Agnostic means you believe that there is a God(s) but that knowing the exact God or knowing anything about the God is impossible
"You dont know what Agnostic is. Agnostic means you believe that there is a God(s) but that knowing the exact God or knowing anything about the God is impossible"
No! Agnostics do not necessarily believe in nor disbelieve in god. Pure agnostics don't even actually exist, they just think they do. There are only 2 positions. Position A; You believe in god. Position B; You don't believe in god. Agnostics think they are in position C but this position does not exist. You can be agnostic theist - "i believe but I am not sure and may never know" or agnostic atheist "i do not believe but am not sure and may never know". Pure agnosticism doesn't really exist.
are you kidding me? i used to be agnostic, but im now atheist. i used to believe that a God existed, but not the God of the bible or any other religious text. Thats considered agnostic. Just because you choose to ignore what agnostic really is doesnt make you right
No, that is NOT considered agnostic. That's called DEISM. Maybe try a dictionary? I think it's hilarious you don't know what agnostic even means and yet are arguing the point. The beauty is, you don't have to take my word for it, you could just look it up. Deism is a form of theism so that would put you in Category A- agnostic theist. As I said, there are only 2 categories.
LOL agnostic means you admit you don't know. Gnostic means you KNOW.
So you can be agnostic and gnostic at once as you could conceivably state you know there is a god, but don't know who he is or what he wants. That would be the position of most deists.
I am an agnostic atheist myself as I don't know there is no god, but I believe there is no god.
WTF is up with these losers doing videos in their cars? Are their heads so far up their asses they can't find a better place? Did this freak's boyfriend kick him out of their love nest for the night so he took it out on 'evilutionists'?
And they wonder why any sane adult laughs at their ignorant asses?
Funny editing of geerup's words. The difference in this video and the quote mining that creationists like geerup practice daily is that we know this is a joke.
Rabid ape, I gotta say I loved this, absolutely hilarious!
And to CreationistsWON(by using big sticks and fire/fear?) and other idiots waving the Quote Mining accusations around, get a grip, read the description box - this is mockery of a fool, nothing more. Rabid ape has not used Geerup's words to suggest this is his actual opinion, that would be quote mining, this is an obvious cut and paste job for the purpose of entertainment and humour.
You don't seem to mind when creationists quotemine. How is this different? Besides RabidApe said he made it for his and our amusement (read the description).
"It still is evil, people might take it otherwise, to cut and edit things this way proves the guy has nothing better to do."
Yeah, when Kent Hovind quotemines Darwin, Newton, Bill Gates and others and is actually using it as an argument for his position - it's OK. When RabidApe makes a COMEDY video doing basically the same - it's evil.
The truth is this RabidApe, this guy is going to replace Shawn, what you people try to do is discredit him without giving him a chance to make something out of that channel.
Yes, now i see it's parody, but it is a common strategy played by Atheists to discredit a person so that others might ignore his arguments without listening to him.
Evil is another word for Atheism, sorry, Atheism is another word for evil
Perhaps you shold devote less time to analyzing us and more time on remedial spelling and grammar. Here are the things you should focus on: 1) the difference between "to" and "too;" and 2) the difference between "threw" and "through." I'm sure you'll provide us with many more colorful examples of your unique command of English as the evening wears on.
"you know what i ment by saying that you people discredit others to avoid discussions"
Oh yes. I knew what you meant. I just wanted you to elaborate.
You have clearly demonstrated your inclination to paint people in broad strokes.
I generally make an effort to not let a few "bad apples" spoil my future interactions with anyone who might fit the same label as someone I have had unpleasant experience with.
I hope geerup does more videos using his Helium voice; it lends credence to his message and immediately validates his stature as the leading creationist spokesman on Youtube.
Debunked my ass! I just went to bed. All you've done is say you don't aprove quotemining, which is cool, but my point was that RabidApe DID NOT intend this video as an argument against creationists. My point still stands.
I don't know. I think the guy has a sense of humour and might actually apreciate this for what it is. On the other hand he could be more batshit insane than pcs in which case lookout for a dmca. :)
Eh, I've never found the whole "Cut clips of people saying stuff to make them sound like they're saying the exact opposite of their position" thing funny. It's stupid and annoying when creationists do it, and it's stupid and annoying when sane people do it.
If you want to make a dishonest video taking someone completely out of context over and over again, at least try not to make it look so obvious...sheesh
... um ... I think it was obvious on purpose. This is what normal people call "a joke". It's not meant to be taken seriously, and I don't think the author intends for you to believe this is what Geerup actually believes.
WOW!!! You actually made rearup sound sane.
panterguy 11 months ago
You make him sound so reasonable. He should hire you to edit the stupid out of all of his videos.
12leenelson 1 year ago
Hehe, he should be locked up somewhere! : )
winterstellar 2 years ago
OMG...I loved this...it was sooo entertaining!
yasisbac 2 years ago
damnit I can't stop laughing when he says Evolution lol....
GreenDragonSage 2 years ago
Excellent... I was beginning to think that geerup was never going to produce coherent thoughts, I see now he only needed a little help organizing his statements...
Very well done.
Omhra 2 years ago
well done:)
Dusty341 2 years ago
He almost seems to be a rational human being when mixed in this way. :P
PersonalPariah 2 years ago
Haha this is brilliant
TheThrashAnvil 2 years ago
the bibel is tru
lamzelam 2 years ago
You spelt it wrong o.O
flurble33 2 years ago
You don't even trust the title.
yaysprinkledirt17 2 years ago
Brilliant. I loved it!
yekahs 2 years ago
VFX2 probably drives a cab and uses its camera.
fidge976 2 years ago
VFX1 is batshit crazy, VFX2 is retarded. I think we're moving up.
AgentGhost 2 years ago
no...I think VFX2 is even worse! Did you see his DNA video? What a jackass.... there is no such thing as pro-abortionists.
FreeThinkingCrusader 2 years ago
RabidApe...Super Kudos...This is paying back creationists for all their horrible quote mining.
Your quote mining of him actually makes him sound intelligent.
Making PCS2 sound intelligent must've taken you forever.
FreeThinkingCrusader 2 years ago
"this is simple stuff" agreed. next topic plz
oldhacks 2 years ago
Nicely done :D
emiliation123 2 years ago
lol you're pathetic to waste your time making this.
go get a life of your own.
scjason420 2 years ago
NO U
RabidApe 2 years ago
Is he taking someone else's life?
sarneysog 2 years ago
yes, that's clearly what I meant.
don't be an idiot.
scjason420 2 years ago
I clearly didn't mean it seriously. Just joking around lolololololololol
sarneysog 2 years ago
If I compare the time it took me to make this to the number of views it has received and comments it has inspired, I think it was time well spent.
RabidApe 2 years ago
LMAO!
scjason420 2 years ago
named venonfangx ? why
Bmeson 2 years ago
Heh, good fun. Does this guy continue the practice of deleting any comments that don't agree with him?
netmystique 2 years ago
Actually, he doesn't. I've had a pretty decent exchange with him. Too bad he's still a fundie.
PluralOfEverything 2 years ago
At least he isn't deleting everything that disagrees with him. To my mind, that is the worst aspect of some of these fundamentalists. They claim no one can present counter evidence and then delete anyone who does.
netmystique 2 years ago
Agreed. His mind may be poisoned by religion, but it is more open than PCS1's was. It's probably because he's older.
PluralOfEverything 2 years ago
What kind of things is His mind open to ? And do you like him better than the old Venom Fang X ? What happen to him anyway?
playboyoft 2 years ago
Well, he hasn't ripped off any children's hospitals, so I'd say I do like him much better. He also doesn't censor comments, and he responds to arguments against him. He has his faults, but he's definitely got PCS1 beat.
PluralOfEverything 2 years ago
Very funny, made me laugh at this goof ball.
gregrutz 2 years ago
You don't even need fair use. By uploading a video to YT you pass the ownership of it to YT; YT is OK with videos that belong to them being used on YT except for cyber bullying which is clearly not the case here.
So yeah, use Geerups videos as much as you like, for he doesn't even own them. =D (overlyhappyface)
exo0O 2 years ago
LOL, that was good. Since that fucker blocked me I don't get to see much of his videos, so this was classic. Thanks.
BadBoyFLSTC 2 years ago
GEERUP strikes me as an unstable, immature, poorly educated individual,constantly isolated and in desperate need of attention...wait ...i get the VFX2 moniker now, lolololo
Bockatadi 2 years ago
Wow, this is the only time I've ever heard anything that makes sense out of geerups mouth. Awesome
tjmcawesome 2 years ago
what a dink
thefusilier1000 2 years ago
Very well done, RabidApe!
RhunDraco 2 years ago
God, this guy seems to be even more retarded than the last venom.
gucker07 2 years ago
Geerup is such a nipple head. He'd never win a debate.
Domzdream 2 years ago
Nipple head. HAHA! Well said.
RhunDraco 2 years ago
lol great work!
Wiggam666 2 years ago
ahaahahahah
Well said VFX 2.0
Niveous23 2 years ago
RabidApe,
Did I ever tell you that I love you?
Great vid!
CrosshairJack 2 years ago
kisses
RabidApe 2 years ago
I love the modern conveniences of indoor plumbing as well.
zombiekiller2045 2 years ago
gnosticism/agnosticism is to beleive / not beleive in god, theism / atheism is to know /know there is not a god. the difference is the a/gnostic is going to quantify his statement with "I could be wrong but..." before going on about whether or not god exists.
jwfcp 2 years ago
Not all Atheists, like myself, do not claim to KNOW there is no god. I simply believe there is no god. I suppose that makes me an Agnostic Atheist...right?
evolutionist101 2 years ago
no, that just makes you agnostic, as opposed to atheist. theres loads of youtube vids on the distinction, dive in.
jwfcp 2 years ago
"agnostic"and "atheist" are not mutually exclusive
RabidApe 2 years ago
Making the claim that god inherently impossible to prove or disprove is mutually exclusive with knowing there is no god.
I suppose a/theism would be a subset of gnosticism though.
jwfcp 2 years ago
"atheism" does not necessarily entail "I know that X does not exist"
I don't "know" that Yahweh doesn't exist, but I really really really really really really doubt it.
RabidApe 2 years ago
This is where BELIEF kicks in based on evidence AND what is mostly likely to be true. If you BELIEVE god does not exist...you are an Atheist. If you KNOW god doesn't exist, you are an Atheist. I would love to see the evidence for ANYONE who KNOWS. I think the claim of absolute knowledge, is absolutely ignorant! HA!
evolutionist101 2 years ago
I think you misunderstand the meaning. I BELIEVE there is NO god. What does that make me? Any lack of belief make me an atheist. Most agnostics claim to have no position or are simply "neutral" on the subject because they believe god is unknowable.
I have dived in. I disagree. Atheism is not a claim of knowledge. Now there are LEVELS of Atheism. The matter could get confusing.
evolutionist101 2 years ago
You've got your definitions backwards. Theism/Atheism is the belief or non belief in a deity. Gnosticism and Agnosticism are the ones concerning your knowledge of such events. Gnostic and Agnostic are QUALIFIERS for theism and atheism. Most atheists are "agnostic atheists". Fundamentalists are gnostic theists.
r00tcause 2 years ago
Wonder why venomfangx and this 50 year old guy have such a close relationship
anderseb2007 2 years ago
LOL! I was joking! Honestly I can't believe you fell for that... Seriously, I know Agnosticism can be several things: You have been told several things from various religions, and not sure what to believe, so you just choose to not know.
mindgame0000000 2 years ago
That's just one example of agnosticism, and there are many more.
mindgame0000000 2 years ago
i loled
DisforDubby 2 years ago
*mirrors* Nicely done. X3
AncaThirteen 2 years ago
He's so crazy it's like an elephant has raped him repeatedly in the ears.
cherrymiss72 2 years ago
in Bizarro World, GEERUP is actually right!
325982668 2 years ago
Woah, it's like some freaky alternate reality. o_O
Repoes 2 years ago
"There are Christians who believe in Evolution"- Yeah, dumbass, they're called AGNOSTICS! Duh!!!
mindgame0000000 2 years ago
they are called Roman Catholics. The last two popes believed in evolution, and the church follows the pope.
lennyhipp 2 years ago
Umm, no. Christians who believe in evolution are not agnostics, they're just bad christians.
r00tcause 2 years ago
or they are logical and rational (well as logical and rational you can be for a theist) Christians
dhcrazy333 2 years ago
Incorrect. That is contradictory. You cannot accept evolution and at the same time attempt to reconcile it with christian beliefs (which is contradicts completely) and be called logical and rational.
r00tcause 2 years ago
how do you figure, as "Christian beliefs" run the gambit from "yeah I know where a church is" to "the bible is the literal word of god"....
just because you believe in some supernatural being doesn't mean that you can't understand the natural world.
1n354a 2 years ago
Yes but christian beliefs should be limited to the bible as gods word.
If you don't want that then be a deist and make up your own details for god. Oh wait all christians do anyway.
adolthitler 2 years ago
"just because you believe in some supernatural being doesn't mean that you can't understand the natural world" You don't get to be a deist and ignore large portions of the bible and still call yourself a christian. That is entirely what is WRONG with most christians. You either FOLLOW THE BIBLE or YOU ARE NOT CHRISTIAN. You don't get to say "well I believe in jesus and his ideas but not most of the bible so im christian". NO. You are NOT. The very book you read from says you cannot do that.
r00tcause 2 years ago
Your definition of being a Christian differs greatly from mine, apparently. I'm sorry that you can't see that inclusion into one group does not mean exclusion from the other.
I don't recall anywhere in the Bible instructions from Jesus or God that all true Christians be intentionally ignorant of the world around them. Perhaps I just missed it - - do you have a verse # handy?
1n354a 2 years ago
Its not "my definition of a christian". Its the bibles definition. You are ignoring your own doctrines definition. That would be like me saying "im an atheist but I believe in god". It makes no sense. The creation story is in direct contradiction to evolution. Which is correct, the bible, or evolution? You can't have both. Don't believe the creation story? So then the bible is wrong? So then why is any of it right and how do you know which parts?
r00tcause 2 years ago
"Its the bibles definition. You are ignoring your own doctrines definition."
Chapter and verse?
RabidApe 2 years ago
"Chapter and verse?" Christian=one who accepts christ as lord. Christs words and story are written in the bible, specifically the new testament. Thereby, the NT must be true if you are a christian. The NT is a followup of the OT. One cannot exist without the other Christ even refers to it and says he is not here to change the old laws. Christians must accept the OT as true as well for the NT to be valid. Evolution disagrees with the OT. The bible itself says that it is the word of god.
r00tcause 2 years ago
I don't know - I am aware of several people who claim to be Christians and also boast a pretty descent scientific understanding of evolutionary theory. Perhaps you should get in touch with somebody like Donexodus2 or Ken Miller (Prof. Bio @ Brown) to figure out where you are mistaken.
Or more amusingly, perhaps you can tell them where they are mistaken!
1n354a 2 years ago
I've already told donexodus where he was mistaken and I'd tell ken miller if I ever met him. I don't see how this is relevant. Just calling yourself something doesn't make you that something. Ignoring large parts of the bible because it doesn't fit the evidence *invalidates* the bible. If large parts of it are wrong, then there is no way to determine which parts are right, thereby, the entire book is invalid.
r00tcause 2 years ago
so now you are the barometer against which all people much measure their worth?
if you ran into the Pope, would you let him know that he is wrong too?
being a Christian is more than reading a book and shutting down your entire brain...after all if your god gave us a brain with such incredible capabilities, would it not be a sin to waste it?
your opinion of a black and white world is not realistic and I think you will find that very few people consider it a valid position.
1n354a 2 years ago
"the barometer against which all people much measure their worth?" Your strawman is not boring me. I never once discussed peoples WORTH, only their belief. Your belief is in no way tied to your worth as a human being.
r00tcause 2 years ago
"your opinion of a black and white world is not realistic "
Thats just absurd. I do not believe in a black and white world. *Some things*, however, are black and white. You have the right to believe anything you want. Any one of these "gambits of belief" as you say, but unless you are specific in your beliefs, you don't get to do so while still calling yourself christian. You never address my point; instead you post nonsense. Could I say I am an atheist who believes in god?
r00tcause 2 years ago
"if you ran into the Pope, would you let him know that he is wrong too?" Without question. Yes, yes I would. "being a Christian is more than reading a book and shutting down your entire brain..." I find that ironic. In order to believe the stories in the bible weighed against the scientific evidence you would *have to shut down your brain* and ignore everything you see. So apparently yes, god wants you to do that. Anything else is a baseless rationalization.
r00tcause 2 years ago
r00tcause,
I have an idea:
You don't let Christians define what "atheist" means to you, and at the same time, you don't define who is a "true Christian" and who isn't.
I don't know about you, but I care a lot more with how a person conducts themselves and interacts with others than what label they embrace (or don't embrace).
RabidApe 2 years ago
"You don't let Christians define what "atheist" means to you, and at the " I'd think you of all people would know better. Being "atheist" doesn't mean anything to me other than how it is defined. If a said i was an atheist but I also believed in a higher power than a christian would have every right to call BS on my incorrect use of the term just as I call BS on there incorrect use of the term. You don't just get to take already defined words and then make up definitions for them.
r00tcause 2 years ago
I feel your comments to 1n354a are dead on. You either believe the bible in its entirety, or not at all.
evolutionist101 2 years ago
That's what I have believed for a long time. You simply cannot pick and choose what to believe in the bible.
If you do that, doesn't it prove that you know that stuff in the bible is wrong and immoral?
CrosshairJack 2 years ago
"If you do that, doesn't it prove that you know that stuff in the bible is wrong and immoral? " Yes, absolutely. It proves that your morals do not come from the bible and logically invalidates the entire document as (I have said before), if one cannot determine which parts are true and which are not, then the entire document is meaningless.
r00tcause 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
or they are well educated.
1n354a 2 years ago
You dont know what Agnostic is. Agnostic means you believe that there is a God(s) but that knowing the exact God or knowing anything about the God is impossible
dhcrazy333 2 years ago
"You dont know what Agnostic is. Agnostic means you believe that there is a God(s) but that knowing the exact God or knowing anything about the God is impossible"
WAT?
RabidApe 2 years ago
No! Agnostics do not necessarily believe in nor disbelieve in god. Pure agnostics don't even actually exist, they just think they do. There are only 2 positions. Position A; You believe in god. Position B; You don't believe in god. Agnostics think they are in position C but this position does not exist. You can be agnostic theist - "i believe but I am not sure and may never know" or agnostic atheist "i do not believe but am not sure and may never know". Pure agnosticism doesn't really exist.
r00tcause 2 years ago
are you kidding me? i used to be agnostic, but im now atheist. i used to believe that a God existed, but not the God of the bible or any other religious text. Thats considered agnostic. Just because you choose to ignore what agnostic really is doesnt make you right
dhcrazy333 2 years ago
So you were a deist, an agnostic simply states that "We don't know whether a god exists or not".
QuasiMolko 2 years ago
No, that is NOT considered agnostic. That's called DEISM. Maybe try a dictionary? I think it's hilarious you don't know what agnostic even means and yet are arguing the point. The beauty is, you don't have to take my word for it, you could just look it up. Deism is a form of theism so that would put you in Category A- agnostic theist. As I said, there are only 2 categories.
r00tcause 2 years ago
LOL agnostic means you admit you don't know. Gnostic means you KNOW.
So you can be agnostic and gnostic at once as you could conceivably state you know there is a god, but don't know who he is or what he wants. That would be the position of most deists.
I am an agnostic atheist myself as I don't know there is no god, but I believe there is no god.
adolthitler 2 years ago
LMAO!!!!!!
thndrlion 2 years ago
Thaaat's right!!! :-D
mindgame0000000 2 years ago
Look, it's Geerup the Psychopath!!! LOL!
mindgame0000000 2 years ago
WTF is up with these losers doing videos in their cars? Are their heads so far up their asses they can't find a better place? Did this freak's boyfriend kick him out of their love nest for the night so he took it out on 'evilutionists'?
And they wonder why any sane adult laughs at their ignorant asses?
Krocotto 2 years ago
i think you are too far gone,dont go kill ur self on youtube like the other mentally unstable people.blabbering nonsense.
jkwon85 2 years ago
Love the remix version!
The original not so much...
proudfootz 2 years ago
This video = ?????
k166a 2 years ago
Insert penis joke here
insert pedophile joke here
fantastic video
BrightRaven0 2 years ago
nice one. He seems like a much more interesting person this way.
Overseer82 2 years ago
awesome remix!
Paxmax 2 years ago
Finally he gets it! Oh wait a minute...
CranesNotSkyHooks 2 years ago
I'll take it!
askegg 2 years ago
lol
good answer!
(give me some tweet love?)
RabidApe 2 years ago
Tweet love on the way :)
askegg 2 years ago
0:14-0:15
tinyurl(.)com/nh6hsp
ha!
pikechris1 2 years ago
Those were the only 2 minutes where GEERUP will ever sound smart.
ChrisGose 2 years ago
Funny editing of geerup's words. The difference in this video and the quote mining that creationists like geerup practice daily is that we know this is a joke.
clairewaldorf2 2 years ago
Rabid ape, I gotta say I loved this, absolutely hilarious!
And to CreationistsWON(by using big sticks and fire/fear?) and other idiots waving the Quote Mining accusations around, get a grip, read the description box - this is mockery of a fool, nothing more. Rabid ape has not used Geerup's words to suggest this is his actual opinion, that would be quote mining, this is an obvious cut and paste job for the purpose of entertainment and humour.
dragon83uk 2 years ago
To CreationistsWon:
no, we have better... much much better, but quote-mining works both ways too!
Now perhaps you see how intolerably annoying the practice is?
BenjaminDBrooks 2 years ago
It took quite a bit of editing to turn that recording into something that actually makes sense.
great job, RabidApe !
synth3s1s 2 years ago
I, for one, also love the modern convenience of indoor plumbing.
lesceptique 2 years ago
completely out of context, evil editing... you people really have nothing better than this.
Shame on you
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
FAIL
read the description
RabidApe 2 years ago
CreationistsWon;
*whoosh* Right over your head
FishApprentice 2 years ago
You don't seem to mind when creationists quotemine. How is this different? Besides RabidApe said he made it for his and our amusement (read the description).
JustAnAdjunct 2 years ago
He isn't saying that this is what was actually meant. It's comedy/parody and anyone with a sense of humour will see it as such.
Cowinspace 2 years ago
Yes, i do, Creationists are just as bad !!! Both sides do it, and i say this to both sides.
These things are just evil, debunk people by debate not by discrediting this way !
"Besides RabidApe said he made it for his and our amusement (read the description). "
It still is evil, people might take it otherwise, to cut and edit things this way proves the guy has nothing better to do.
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
You are a creationist, hahahahaha.
DavosLogos 2 years ago
You are a Atheist, hahahahaha.
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
hahahahah, thats so funny!
DavosLogos 2 years ago
"It still is evil, people might take it otherwise, to cut and edit things this way proves the guy has nothing better to do."
Yeah, when Kent Hovind quotemines Darwin, Newton, Bill Gates and others and is actually using it as an argument for his position - it's OK. When RabidApe makes a COMEDY video doing basically the same - it's evil.
Can you say hypocrisy.
JustAnAdjunct 2 years ago
"Darwin, Newton, Bill Gates and others and is actually using it as an argument for his position - it's OK."
You didn't read what i wrote did you ? Please, read before you comment...i said "
Creationists are just as bad !!!"
"Can you say hypocrisy. "
????? I just debunked you, now please, quote me where i support Hovind or any other Creationists who used the same methods.
I believe you can't, now don't go around it, just admit you're wrong...
And read comments before you reply to them
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
Debunked you hardcore style
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
I'm sorry that you are unable to distinguish between "comedic parody" and "quote mining"...
Is it just me, or do creationists in general (maybe you're an exception) have a disinclination to appreciate subtlety and nuance?
WTF is "evil", anyway?
RabidApe 2 years ago
The truth is this RabidApe, this guy is going to replace Shawn, what you people try to do is discredit him without giving him a chance to make something out of that channel.
Yes, now i see it's parody, but it is a common strategy played by Atheists to discredit a person so that others might ignore his arguments without listening to him.
Evil is another word for Atheism, sorry, Atheism is another word for evil
Peace
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
"what you people try to do"
What do you mean "you people"?
"Yes, now i see it's parody"
...does that mean you couldn't at first?
"Evil is another word for Atheism, sorry, Atheism is another word for evil "
You're not being very consistent. Earlier, you said: "Both sides do it, and i say this to both sides. These things are just evil"
So evil is another word for Creationism now?
RabidApe 2 years ago
"What do you mean "you people"?"
Atheists
"...does that mean you couldn't at first?"
Nope, didn't read the description, but it doesn't make it right either what you try to do in this clip ...
"Both sides do it, and i say this to both sides. These things are just evil""
I'm sorry to say this, but you're not being very consistent, people on the Creationists side who do this use evil ways, but Atheists are evil itself.
"So evil is another word for Creationism now? "
Not relevant, i'm sorry
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
"doesn't make it right either what you try to do in this clip"
That doesn't make it "wrong", either.
"Atheists are evil itself"
Riiiiiiiiiiiiight. I asked for a definition of "evil", and you provided a synonym. PLEASE - define "evil".
RabidApe 2 years ago
Like you would ever take the explination of Evil seriously, i know you people to well.
No, not directed to Devils ears, not giving you any chance to suck on that ...
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
"i know you people to well"
Perhaps you shold devote less time to analyzing us and more time on remedial spelling and grammar. Here are the things you should focus on: 1) the difference between "to" and "too;" and 2) the difference between "threw" and "through." I'm sure you'll provide us with many more colorful examples of your unique command of English as the evening wears on.
clairewaldorf2 2 years ago
"Like you would ever take the explination of Evil seriously, i know you people to well."
More irrational prejudice. It's almost cute.
Thank you for your continuing to be a bad example.
It makes my "job" here a lot easier.
RabidApe 2 years ago
Not to mention the fact that you know what i ment by saying that you people discredit others to avoid discussions, you know its the truth.
I will not convince you, neither can you convince me, so continue your crusade !
Ciao ciao
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
"you know what i ment by saying that you people discredit others to avoid discussions"
Oh yes. I knew what you meant. I just wanted you to elaborate.
You have clearly demonstrated your inclination to paint people in broad strokes.
I generally make an effort to not let a few "bad apples" spoil my future interactions with anyone who might fit the same label as someone I have had unpleasant experience with.
Mark 12:31
Thanks for at least being able to admit that you are close-minded.
RabidApe 2 years ago
Atheists quoting out of the Bible, very nice, btw , my other comment didn't came threw , i'll try it again ...
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
"Atheists quoting out of the Bible, very nice"
Few things will make you an atheist faster than reading the Bible with an open mind.
I DARE YOU to start at Genesis 1:1 and see how far you can get.
RabidApe 2 years ago
Probably about as far as plants coming before the sun lol.
MyPisceanNature 2 years ago
"I just wanted you to elaborate."
Does say a lot about you people, doesn't it ?!
"Thanks for at least being able to admit that you are close-minded. "
No , you just did by asking me what evil means, that truly is ones again a prove what you people really try to do.
Calling others names is not giving you any adventage, no my man, you're close-minded
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
>>"I just wanted you to elaborate."
>>Does say a lot about you people, doesn't it?!
Yeah, that "we" are fans of clear communication, rigorous definitions, and meaning what we say.
RabidApe 2 years ago
IIRC, "close-minded" means unwilling to change your mind, and holding on to a conclusion despite opposing evidence.
You explicitly admitted that to be the case.
"I will not convince you"
In principle, you could. Good arguments and evidence are all that is required. But you have provided neither, so that hasn't happened yet.
"neither can you convince me"
There ya go. Compare that to this:
watch?v=wBCC77EFU8E
RabidApe 2 years ago
Leave this guy CW, he's not worth it, people who make clips like this to discredit others are not even worth it.
Let him believe his own lies, you were right, placing that in the description box doesn't make it right.
It's all about discredit people, leave him, let him burn, why waste any time.
wrestlingfan110 2 years ago
I hope geerup does more videos using his Helium voice; it lends credence to his message and immediately validates his stature as the leading creationist spokesman on Youtube.
clairewaldorf2 2 years ago
lol, does he actually suck on helium to do those...?
I know helium isn't harmful in moderation, but I can't help but wonder if he's depriving himself of oxygen....
(I appreciate the modern conveniences of pitch-shifting software!)
RabidApe 2 years ago
"I can't help but wonder if he's depriving himself of oxygen...."
Indeed, it was his odd behavior and moronic comments that led me to conclude he quite literally sucked.
clairewaldorf2 2 years ago
"Is it just me, or do creationists in general (maybe you're an exception) have a disinclination to appreciate subtlety and nuance?"
"Disinclination?" Perhaps you mean INABILITY to discern subtlety and nuance, as analogy, metaphor, and oddly enough, parable.
clairewaldorf2 2 years ago
Debunked my ass! I just went to bed. All you've done is say you don't aprove quotemining, which is cool, but my point was that RabidApe DID NOT intend this video as an argument against creationists. My point still stands.
JustAnAdjunct 2 years ago
OMG brilliant. I love it.
stylovore 2 years ago
Hahahaha !!!
GEERUP is going to be so pissed !!
Very nice editing by the way....
5-stars and favoured
Traxx01 2 years ago
I don't know. I think the guy has a sense of humour and might actually apreciate this for what it is. On the other hand he could be more batshit insane than pcs in which case lookout for a dmca. :)
Cowinspace 2 years ago
As Lewis Black put it:
"They are crazy(creationists), they are stone cold fuck nuts. We are talking about people who watch the Flintstones as if it's a documentary".
JustAnAdjunct 2 years ago
Normally I don't like these sorts of remixes, but I think this was a good one.
TheBronzeDog 2 years ago
Really well made. Great vid.
ArtificialCleverenAI 2 years ago
Eh, I've never found the whole "Cut clips of people saying stuff to make them sound like they're saying the exact opposite of their position" thing funny. It's stupid and annoying when creationists do it, and it's stupid and annoying when sane people do it.
Hooya2 2 years ago
lmfao holy moly mashup batman
blad3runn69 2 years ago
nice beats man, nice ;)
th3d3wd3r 2 years ago
If you want to make a dishonest video taking someone completely out of context over and over again, at least try not to make it look so obvious...sheesh
fellowservant34 2 years ago
FAIL
read the description
RabidApe 2 years ago
... um ... I think it was obvious on purpose. This is what normal people call "a joke". It's not meant to be taken seriously, and I don't think the author intends for you to believe this is what Geerup actually believes.
somtwo 2 years ago
Preach da truth!
Zekkron 2 years ago
If christians can't see the irony in their stance against evolution after this, there really is no hope for civilization.
Sloth7d 2 years ago
brilliant!
"This is simple stuff" .... "I love indoor plumbing" :)
lmao
Tritium8 2 years ago
thats awesome!
x7urdF3rgasonx 2 years ago
Awesome editing!!!
Domzdream 2 years ago
HOLY SHIT RabidApe. BEST VID EVER!!! Absolutely hilarious. Bravo bravo!
groundrunner752 2 years ago
Everyone should favorite this :)
MrMetal616 2 years ago
No helium this time?
poorkinghaggard 2 years ago
hmm who wants to make a soundboard of this joker?
JonasC22 2 years ago
this geerup guy is on a completely different level. fascinating... lo!
pikechris1 2 years ago
Geerup is sitting in his car because ...
- his family is afraid of him and switched the lock of the house
- his neighbourhood is rife with car thieves so he protects his car 24/7
- someone told him in a car you can't get struck by lightning and he decided to trust science for once.
Kattarina98 2 years ago
Geerup actualy making sense.. hole moly batman!
Vogter2100 2 years ago
"VenomFangX 2.0" is good, but I prefer "VFX: The Next Generation." :)
lol @ "That's the chicken's job"... :)
Great job!
kirke420 2 years ago
"VenomFangX 2.0" is good, but I prefer "VFX: The Next Generation."
GEERUP is much older that VFX... it should be the other way around.
Scrapheap71 2 years ago
You mean like the old Star Wars is actually the newer Star Wars, and the new Star Wars is really the older Star Wars... :)
Really, I just wanted a platform to tell my joke, but the real point is that this video rocked! :)
kirke420 2 years ago
OK, now i confused damnit!!! X-D
Scrapheap71 2 years ago
Only wish he was actually this honest
mordinvan 2 years ago