Only Jesus Christ and his brother, George Washington Christ, are the true Lords. Jesus and George Christ will be reborn in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania of the virgin Betsy Ross. When they come back, America will finally rid itself of Moslems, queers, liberals, illegal immigrants and Satanic Darwinists.
Jesus didn't exist neither... you're arguments are invaled... and what about misspellign by european first invaders? in english they call "Chinchou" to "Jingzhou"... so di a bit more researching before emitting an opinion
Eastern writers agree in placing the birth of Beddou 1027 BC. The doctrines of this god prevailed over Japan&China. According to belief: 'God's greatest incarnation was three 3,000 years ago, in the province of Cashmere, under the name of Beddou. He was thought to have sprung from a virgin of royal blood, who, when she became a mother, continued to be a virgin; that the king, uneasy at his birth, was desirous he be put to death & caused all the males born at the same period be put to death!
Guys, guys, guys, calm down! Just because other mythologies testify of Jesus Christ (though in admittedly distorted ways) doesn't mean they're evil or refutable. Look at the Egyptian god Horus (mostly from Memphite theology), the writings on him are practically verbatim with the verses on Jesus, and that seems more like a prophecy to me. Then there's Quetzalcoatl of the Aztec mythology. There's MUCH more, but I'm running out of my allowed characters for this post. Just look it all up.
"The name of the founder of Budhism has been spelled by European authors in the following modes, and probably in many others that have not come under my notice: Fo, Fod, Foe, Fohe, Fohi, Fho, Fuh, Futh, Pot, Pott, Poot, Poota, Pootah, Poth, Poti, Pout, Phuta, Wud, Bod, Bot, Bud, But, Buth, Budh, Buddh, Bood, Boodh, Boudh, Bhood, Baoth, Bauth, Budo, Buto, Budud, Booda, Bodda, Budda, Butta, Budha, Buddha, Budhu, Buddhu, Budho, Buddho, Buddow, Bodhow, Budhoo, Budso, Budha, Boudha, Boudhu,..."
"his conclusion that "Beddru" is a typo - which I am quite sure is true - is based on the fact that the word "Beddru" only appears once in the book, on page 30, while the word "Beddou," which I am equally certain was Graves's original intention, appears three times, in Chapter 38, on pp. 372-373."
@haggardpeople Actually Yeshua ben Yousef (Jesus son of Joseph) is a historically recognized figure in history, anyone who refutes that exhibits a terribly ignorant view on ancient and classical history. The debate isn't over his existence, it's over where or not he was of divine influence or origin.
Yeah, there's only several historical records of Jesus from several countries, and the most bibliographically proven collection of documents in history by a landslide. No proof whatsoever.
Actually, there are NO historical accounts of a real Jesus, the Christ. Yes, there are mentions of a Nazarene, but the Nazarenes were a Jewish sect,as well as a people from Nazareth. Just like Lesbians can be either gay women or ANY person from Lesbos. There are also other arguments for this POV. If you want them, message me, but it's to late forme to feel like doing it now.
You said, "there is no 'DD' and 'DRU' in Japanese language. What about the Buddha? There is two D-s. If I write beddru as Bedru. So in Japanese language 'BED and Ru are there. This logic is null and void.
I'll give you an e for effort, but you're getting pedantic with your critiscism. The dispelling of a spelling of a word (I just made a funny) is not debunking or arguing the core idea.
Graves goes on to list these 20 or so beings, including "Beddru of Japan." In reality, the reason detractors have been unable to find the term "Beddru" is because they've been looking for the wrong word. With the help of a friend who made a simple but brilliant observation, I determined that "Beddru" is a TYPO of the kind not uncommon in the 19th century, when manuscripts were handwritten, such that the typesetters could easily make such a mistake.
I have noticed many such typos in numerous books from that era. Even in the computer era, typos make their way into the best proofread texts, and there is an unfortunate amount in those I have written as well.
This conclusion that "Beddru" is a typo - which I am quite sure is true - is based on the fact that the word "Beddru" only appears once in the book, on page 30, while the word "Beddou," which I am equally certain was Graves's original intention, appears three times.
Acharya S doesn't use Beddru as a parallel, but rather makes a pathetic attempt to prove that "Beddru" is merely a typo for "buddah" which is interesting because Kersey Graves discusses buddah many times throughout his "The World's 16 crucified saviors"
but if anyone actually takes Graves seriously (as Acharya S HAS done), then they should simply be dismissed as irrational and unworthy of an actual debate
What evidence do you have that a virgin ever had a baby, anywhere? What evidence do you have that anybody ever got up out of their grave, anywhere?
saucersauce 4 months ago
They've got a lot in common, they're both myths XD' and they share: resurection, performing miracles, 12 disciples, etc....
PurpleMilkcup 4 months ago
Only Jesus Christ and his brother, George Washington Christ, are the true Lords. Jesus and George Christ will be reborn in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania of the virgin Betsy Ross. When they come back, America will finally rid itself of Moslems, queers, liberals, illegal immigrants and Satanic Darwinists.
HomleandSecurity 4 months ago
Jesus didn't exist neither... you're arguments are invaled... and what about misspellign by european first invaders? in english they call "Chinchou" to "Jingzhou"... so di a bit more researching before emitting an opinion
PurpleMilkcup 5 months ago
@PurpleMilkcup Umm...moron...Jesus is in the Bible. Thus, He existed. Derp derp.
HomleandSecurity 4 months ago
@HomleandSecurity Bible must never be literally interpreted ¬¬'
PurpleMilkcup 4 months ago
Eastern writers agree in placing the birth of Beddou 1027 BC. The doctrines of this god prevailed over Japan&China. According to belief: 'God's greatest incarnation was three 3,000 years ago, in the province of Cashmere, under the name of Beddou. He was thought to have sprung from a virgin of royal blood, who, when she became a mother, continued to be a virgin; that the king, uneasy at his birth, was desirous he be put to death & caused all the males born at the same period be put to death!
EyeofHorus33 6 months ago
@EyeofHorus33 Only Jesus Christ and George Washington Christ were born of virgins. These other false gods must be killed!
HomleandSecurity 4 months ago
Guys, guys, guys, calm down! Just because other mythologies testify of Jesus Christ (though in admittedly distorted ways) doesn't mean they're evil or refutable. Look at the Egyptian god Horus (mostly from Memphite theology), the writings on him are practically verbatim with the verses on Jesus, and that seems more like a prophecy to me. Then there's Quetzalcoatl of the Aztec mythology. There's MUCH more, but I'm running out of my allowed characters for this post. Just look it all up.
sterance2 10 months ago
Comment removed
SuperAnimalDrummer 1 year ago
"The name of the founder of Budhism has been spelled by European authors in the following modes, and probably in many others that have not come under my notice: Fo, Fod, Foe, Fohe, Fohi, Fho, Fuh, Futh, Pot, Pott, Poot, Poota, Pootah, Poth, Poti, Pout, Phuta, Wud, Bod, Bot, Bud, But, Buth, Budh, Buddh, Bood, Boodh, Boudh, Bhood, Baoth, Bauth, Budo, Buto, Budud, Booda, Bodda, Budda, Butta, Budha, Buddha, Budhu, Buddhu, Budho, Buddho, Buddow, Bodhow, Budhoo, Budso, Budha, Boudha, Boudhu,..."
SuperAnimalDrummer 1 year ago
Beddru is "Buddha." It's a mis-spelling.
"his conclusion that "Beddru" is a typo - which I am quite sure is true - is based on the fact that the word "Beddru" only appears once in the book, on page 30, while the word "Beddou," which I am equally certain was Graves's original intention, appears three times, in Chapter 38, on pp. 372-373."
From "Beddru is Beddou is Buddha" by DM Murdock
SuperAnimalDrummer 1 year ago
Where is the historical evidence Jesus ever existed? The Bible isnt a History book, its a Story book...
haggardpeople 1 year ago
@haggardpeople Actually Yeshua ben Yousef (Jesus son of Joseph) is a historically recognized figure in history, anyone who refutes that exhibits a terribly ignorant view on ancient and classical history. The debate isn't over his existence, it's over where or not he was of divine influence or origin.
sterance2 10 months ago
Also, in the Quran 19:36 Jesus said that Allah (God) is his lord,so worship him this is the straight path.
GTpanik 1 year ago
If Jesus is God, then tell me about Matthew 21:11 and Luke 24:19 which states that he was a Prophet.
GTpanik 1 year ago
gay...
franky1902 1 year ago
"Jesus Christ was a myth, and we have no proof that he existed." - See how that works?
DomesticatedDanger 1 year ago
there is just as little proof of jesus. yes this is a myth but thats the point. jesus is also a myth.
zellen420 2 years ago
Just see my response to Angelsdawn's post. I don't feel like retyping my sarcasm.
TheTravisPierson 2 years ago
No proof that Jesus or God existed.
HAH, CHECKMATE.
Btw, its sad how brainwashed you are.
Angelsdawn 2 years ago
Yeah, there's only several historical records of Jesus from several countries, and the most bibliographically proven collection of documents in history by a landslide. No proof whatsoever.
TheTravisPierson 2 years ago
@TheTravisPierson
link plz mah guru
Angelsdawn 2 years ago
@TheTravisPierson
Actually, there are NO historical accounts of a real Jesus, the Christ. Yes, there are mentions of a Nazarene, but the Nazarenes were a Jewish sect,as well as a people from Nazareth. Just like Lesbians can be either gay women or ANY person from Lesbos. There are also other arguments for this POV. If you want them, message me, but it's to late forme to feel like doing it now.
GnosticSage 1 year ago
Comment removed
imamca 2 years ago
You said, "there is no 'DD' and 'DRU' in Japanese language. What about the Buddha? There is two D-s. If I write beddru as Bedru. So in Japanese language 'BED and Ru are there. This logic is null and void.
imamca 2 years ago
Buddha was Indian. His philosophy caught on in China. There's no Japan in this equation.
TheTravisPierson 2 years ago
@TheTravisPierson
There is a LARGE Buddhist following in Japan. If it made it to China from India, it found it's way 750 more miles to Japan.
GnosticSage 1 year ago
Technically, there's little evidence for Jesus' existance either....
kingbadmovie 2 years ago
I'll give you an e for effort, but you're getting pedantic with your critiscism. The dispelling of a spelling of a word (I just made a funny) is not debunking or arguing the core idea.
siddacious 2 years ago
Graves goes on to list these 20 or so beings, including "Beddru of Japan." In reality, the reason detractors have been unable to find the term "Beddru" is because they've been looking for the wrong word. With the help of a friend who made a simple but brilliant observation, I determined that "Beddru" is a TYPO of the kind not uncommon in the 19th century, when manuscripts were handwritten, such that the typesetters could easily make such a mistake.
Gameboygenius 3 years ago
I have noticed many such typos in numerous books from that era. Even in the computer era, typos make their way into the best proofread texts, and there is an unfortunate amount in those I have written as well.
This conclusion that "Beddru" is a typo - which I am quite sure is true - is based on the fact that the word "Beddru" only appears once in the book, on page 30, while the word "Beddou," which I am equally certain was Graves's original intention, appears three times.
Gameboygenius 3 years ago
Google for Beddru is Beddou is Buddha to find the rest of the text.
Gameboygenius 3 years ago
Beddru is Beddou is Buddha
kelekous 3 years ago
Graves discusses Buddha separately. Beddru is not Buddha.
KabaneTheChristian 2 years ago
you are a sad,sad individual
airsofter143 3 years ago
Acharya S doesn't use Beddru as a parallel, but rather makes a pathetic attempt to prove that "Beddru" is merely a typo for "buddah" which is interesting because Kersey Graves discusses buddah many times throughout his "The World's 16 crucified saviors"
but if anyone actually takes Graves seriously (as Acharya S HAS done), then they should simply be dismissed as irrational and unworthy of an actual debate
migkillertwo 3 years ago
Your video is accurate.
The letter-combination of Beddru would necessitate a loan-word in Japanese. But of course, the name Beddru is not a loan-word.
The fact that Kearsey Graves would obnoxiously make this up alone debunks him as a reliable source.
DiMagRocks 3 years ago
SirTheist made a new video
FranzDuckVideos 3 years ago
Thanks for the notice, dude.
truthforrealtruth 3 years ago
Didn't know of a figure by the name of Beddru till this video :P
Terrencje 3 years ago