The Earth should look bigger. Take a look at this picture: space.about.com/od/pictures/ig/Earth-Pictures-Gallery/Distant-Earth-and-Moon.htm and imagine yourself on the moon's surface. Something's wrong here...
From the Moon, Earth subtends to an angular diameter of 1.8 degrees. That is about three and a half times larger than the Moon appears from Earth (half a degree). The camera used no zoom, so Earth looks about as big as what it would look like in real life. Most likely, you have seen other photos of Earth from the Moon where zoom was used, which made Earth look huge in comparison to the distant craters. This is actual footage from an actual satellite that was orbiting the Moon.
Take a photo of the Moon without zooming or cropping and you will see that it looks no more than a small circle far off in the sky. Earth is just 3.5 times larger than the Moon, so Earth from the Moon would not really look that big...just 1.8 degrees.
An interesting fact: If you were to stand on the surface of the Moon where Earth was visible in the lunar sky it would continuously be in the exact same position in the sky at all times. It would never rise or set.
Due to libration, Earth would wobble in the sky slightly. For observers on the border between the "far" and "near" side of the Moon, they would see Earth slowly rise up and set in the same area of the sky. However, for all intents and purposes, you are correct.
Why is it so hard to believe that we landed on the moon, when astronomy has brought us so many more unbelievable discoveries that people never choose to pull apart like the stunning detail of photos from the Voyager probes, or the 10 billion year-old pictures of the farthest galaxies from Hubble, or the continued operation of the Mars rovers, or the landing of Huygens on Titan which has methane lakes, or even the current ambitious Kepler scope to find habitable planets. Hoaxers have no vision.
I think it has to do with the fact that all the craft you speak of are unmanned. I don't think most have problems with machines going into space. But when you bring people into the equation it opens up a whole nother can of worms. And before you say "what about the space station?" That is not in outer space but in earth orbit 185 miles up. Outer space is a much harsher place for man to be. Van allen belts solar flares extreme temps. hot/cold. Not as a group but manned moon landings only.
"Why is it so hard to believe that we landed on the moon"
The evidence shows we didn't.
"There's a summary of hoax evidence on a science forum. To see it, Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon". The summary is on page 15. It's the seventh post from the top."
I agree with some of the comments here, it does have a certain CGI quality. Its even more apparent in the less pixelated HD version of the video. Its probably because of the bad quality footage we normally have seen of the moon, and making comparisons to it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is computer generated - No way is it real. Where is the US flag? why not show that! They will never show authentic shots of the moon because it has bases on it.
I've always hated CGI effects.For example...The werewolf in "An American Werewolf In London".It looked REAL! It was VERY SCARY! (Yes,I am aware that there's no such things as "Werewolves",but I am trying to make a point here,so bear with me).
Contrast that with "An American Werewolf In Paris".The "Werewolf" SUCKED! It was NOT scary at all,because it looked so OBVIOUSLY FAKE!
Though computer generated effects are getting better,and look more "Real" as they progress.You (Or atleast I) can STILL tell when it's REAL or when it's "Memorex".
The first thought I had when watching this video,is that I was watching "An American werewolf In Japan"! THIS IS SO DAMN FAKE!
I'am sorry people...You can laugh,mock,and trash me all you want to.I KNOW we have the technology to ACTUALLY do what THEY (NWO) say we have done,but I am telling you,this is FAKE!
I've seen so-called UFO videos on youtube that looked more real than this crap (and no,I don't believe in "Aliens" any more than I do in "Werewolves",but again,I"am trying to make a point) and they were also CGI effects! The REAL question is,why are THEY trying to pass off this crap as "Real"? Are THEY testing us to see if we can tell the difference? Click on my username if I've got your attention,and you want to learn MORE!
this is a funny video because there's no way you'd EVER see this phenomenon in real life due to tidal locking
the perspective on this shot is very weird, it makes earth look very small... is this because of the scope of the frame itself? I'd assume so because at any reasonable altitude you shouldn't be able to see that distinct a curvature on the moon
Hmmmm...video description says it was shot by the KAGUYA lunar explorer. You can't really make assumptions about what the curvature of the moon and the size of the earth relative to the moon would be without knowing what focal length lens was being used. This video is what I would expect to see from a wide angle shot. I have no idea why tidal locking would make these shots impossible. The moon's orbit and rotation are tidally locked, that has no effect on the satellite that shot this video.
oh let me clarify. I mean, this is a phenomenon that can only be captured on film by an orbiting object. If you were to observe the earth from the moon at a stationary point on its surface it wouldn't change position due to the fact that the moon's orbit is in sync with its rotation, so all you'd see is a change of light source over time
NO STARS AGAIN! In the space vacuum, with no obscuring air or dust, STARS ARE VERY BRIGHT! Show a moving star canopy in these videos (over-expose the earth if necessary) and I'll believe the video is genuine. Star canopies are impossible to fake, and enable the exact position of the observer to be calculated. This video is fake. The US controls Japan's space program. This is just another anti-hoax effort by NASA's pals in Japan.
FAKE, why is there no stars, and why doesn't the moon look real. BEcause japan has no rover on the moon. Japanese could never reach the moon. Its just a computer simulation, and a poor one at that.
Japanese could never reach the moon??? I bet you that if there was ANY economical gain on doing it they would have not only reach it, but build buildings for tourism!
The moon is inhabited with thousands of innocent people that are being eaten by Draconians as we...uh...sit here watching YouTube. Let us do something to help them.
While watching this clip of the earth -rise I can recall APOLLO 8 as the trio were orbiting the moon on XMAS 1968 AS they were filmig their trip one of them placed his finger over the lens so there was TOTAL DARKNESS as the earth vanished from view And Anders doing the filming said something like "Hey you guys the EARTH has disappeared & we will have to spend the rest of our lives orbiting the moon" As if the earth vanished" And what if the EARTH VAnished
Also, keep in mind that the Moon does not have an atmosphere that would distort the size at all. Plus, it looks like the orbiter is about 60 or so miles above the surface.. maybe more... so to say that this si some sort of conspiracy is rubbish..
This is so cool man! I remember the last few missions to the moon as a kid in Ohio. Niel Armstrong was my hero! Untill he was replaced by George Lucas.
dont you guys think at the earthrise our planet was too small? as if it was farther the the normal and you see it perfectly clear comparing to the earthset
i got ur point but i dont think that this difference of altittude between the rise and set would be far enough to make that difference on the "size" of earth
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i like the way earth doesn't move, it just sits there in a fixed position! man, the people responsible for this fake must think were all thick as S***
the Japanese spacecraft is up thee - it is equipped with a HDTV camera, and they have been putting these cips up on there site since they began recieving the images.
and you make a comment like that for the whole world to see . . . .
What is this song man?
5479900 4 months ago
Comment removed
oldblob1 4 months ago
Something else is wrong here. Pause the video at 1:21. Someone please explain that to me.
oldblob1 4 months ago
ow now that is very beautifull.
zetalore 10 months ago
wtf! I'm not a fan of conspiracy or things like that, but this clip looks like a fake! It reminds me the computer graphic (o_O) lol!?
p.s. we went to the moon in my opinion and i feel really proud of this great achievement!!
Badabeo 1 year ago
The Earth should look bigger. Take a look at this picture: space.about.com/od/pictures/ig/Earth-Pictures-Gallery/Distant-Earth-and-Moon.htm and imagine yourself on the moon's surface. Something's wrong here...
theta757 1 year ago
@theta757
From the Moon, Earth subtends to an angular diameter of 1.8 degrees. That is about three and a half times larger than the Moon appears from Earth (half a degree). The camera used no zoom, so Earth looks about as big as what it would look like in real life. Most likely, you have seen other photos of Earth from the Moon where zoom was used, which made Earth look huge in comparison to the distant craters. This is actual footage from an actual satellite that was orbiting the Moon.
dumbtreeclimber 1 year ago
@theta757
Take a photo of the Moon without zooming or cropping and you will see that it looks no more than a small circle far off in the sky. Earth is just 3.5 times larger than the Moon, so Earth from the Moon would not really look that big...just 1.8 degrees.
dumbtreeclimber 1 year ago
Comment removed
theta757 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can anybody explain why the Earth looks so small?
theta757 1 year ago
Beautiful images.
It is so unfortunate that some people simply deny mankind's greatest achievements.
majomask 1 year ago
An interesting fact: If you were to stand on the surface of the Moon where Earth was visible in the lunar sky it would continuously be in the exact same position in the sky at all times. It would never rise or set.
JasonWardStudios 2 years ago
@JasonWardStudios
Due to libration, Earth would wobble in the sky slightly. For observers on the border between the "far" and "near" side of the Moon, they would see Earth slowly rise up and set in the same area of the sky. However, for all intents and purposes, you are correct.
dumbtreeclimber 1 year ago
This is just extraordinary!
BattleShipJohn 2 years ago
The title of the song?
takeo1969 2 years ago
Comment removed
takeo1969 2 years ago
Why is it so hard to believe that we landed on the moon, when astronomy has brought us so many more unbelievable discoveries that people never choose to pull apart like the stunning detail of photos from the Voyager probes, or the 10 billion year-old pictures of the farthest galaxies from Hubble, or the continued operation of the Mars rovers, or the landing of Huygens on Titan which has methane lakes, or even the current ambitious Kepler scope to find habitable planets. Hoaxers have no vision.
swiftalb 2 years ago 3
AGAIN
I think it has to do with the fact that all the craft you speak of are unmanned. I don't think most have problems with machines going into space. But when you bring people into the equation it opens up a whole nother can of worms. And before you say "what about the space station?" That is not in outer space but in earth orbit 185 miles up. Outer space is a much harsher place for man to be. Van allen belts solar flares extreme temps. hot/cold. Not as a group but manned moon landings only.
n2theblue 2 years ago
I agree with you. landing on the moon was one of the greatest human acheivments why do so many people believe that it was a hoax?
xMASHHEADx 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
"Why is it so hard to believe that we landed on the moon"
The evidence shows we didn't.
"There's a summary of hoax evidence on a science forum. To see it, Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon". The summary is on page 15. It's the seventh post from the top."
Cosmored 2 years ago
when someone is stucked in his own mountain of problems..should see this clip.
magobarato 2 years ago
i can see my house from here
DudeWithTheBling 2 years ago
Stunning! I can see my home.
gdedi 2 years ago 3
I agree with some of the comments here, it does have a certain CGI quality. Its even more apparent in the less pixelated HD version of the video. Its probably because of the bad quality footage we normally have seen of the moon, and making comparisons to it.
itsabomberscope 3 years ago
why don't they land on the moon and have a walk about?
CopyriteInfringement 3 years ago
If you give them the money... :D
MrCalhoun 3 years ago 2
how many people have seen an actual Earthrise? anyone on here? didn't think so, if you don't think it looks real, don't watch it
bgs893 3 years ago
This is NOT a fake. Simply research it! I suppose you think that we never landed on the moon either.
slatch1 3 years ago
I think we landed, but it looks faked to me...
maybe the original one hadn't good quality and the japs released this for the press conference
LoudS1l3nc3 2 years ago
Ok, i retire what i said. I just tried to do an earthrise and earthset in celestia and they look pretty much like the vid
Its just that the earth moves so quickly... its a quite strange optical effect
Sorry, my bad =(
LoudS1l3nc3 2 years ago
Of course it is real. It was shot by the HDTV camera onboard the Japanese Kaguya probe. Google it.
GroovyG78 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is computer generated - No way is it real. Where is the US flag? why not show that! They will never show authentic shots of the moon because it has bases on it.
FugginBarstod 3 years ago
I've always hated CGI effects.For example...The werewolf in "An American Werewolf In London".It looked REAL! It was VERY SCARY! (Yes,I am aware that there's no such things as "Werewolves",but I am trying to make a point here,so bear with me).
Contrast that with "An American Werewolf In Paris".The "Werewolf" SUCKED! It was NOT scary at all,because it looked so OBVIOUSLY FAKE!
TheOwlMan 3 years ago
looked so OBVIOUSLY FAKE!
Though computer generated effects are getting better,and look more "Real" as they progress.You (Or atleast I) can STILL tell when it's REAL or when it's "Memorex".
The first thought I had when watching this video,is that I was watching "An American werewolf In Japan"! THIS IS SO DAMN FAKE!
I'am sorry people...You can laugh,mock,and trash me all you want to.I KNOW we have the technology to ACTUALLY do what THEY (NWO) say we have done,but I am telling you,this is FAKE!
TheOwlMan 3 years ago
I've seen so-called UFO videos on youtube that looked more real than this crap (and no,I don't believe in "Aliens" any more than I do in "Werewolves",but again,I"am trying to make a point) and they were also CGI effects! The REAL question is,why are THEY trying to pass off this crap as "Real"? Are THEY testing us to see if we can tell the difference? Click on my username if I've got your attention,and you want to learn MORE!
TheOwlMan 3 years ago
this is a funny video because there's no way you'd EVER see this phenomenon in real life due to tidal locking
the perspective on this shot is very weird, it makes earth look very small... is this because of the scope of the frame itself? I'd assume so because at any reasonable altitude you shouldn't be able to see that distinct a curvature on the moon
jazzpsalti 3 years ago
Hmmmm...video description says it was shot by the KAGUYA lunar explorer. You can't really make assumptions about what the curvature of the moon and the size of the earth relative to the moon would be without knowing what focal length lens was being used. This video is what I would expect to see from a wide angle shot. I have no idea why tidal locking would make these shots impossible. The moon's orbit and rotation are tidally locked, that has no effect on the satellite that shot this video.
why4duck 3 years ago
oh let me clarify. I mean, this is a phenomenon that can only be captured on film by an orbiting object. If you were to observe the earth from the moon at a stationary point on its surface it wouldn't change position due to the fact that the moon's orbit is in sync with its rotation, so all you'd see is a change of light source over time
jazzpsalti 3 years ago 2
Beautiful. Thank you.
PCRowan 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
years 610-632 QuranKerim-Yasin-40:
And the sun runs on to a term appointed for it; that is the ordinance of the Mighty, the Knowing.
And (as for) the moon, We have ordained for it stages till it becomes again as an old dry palm branch.
Neither is it allowable to the sun that it should overtake the moon, nor can the night outstrip the day; and all float on in a sphere.
ilkerGx 3 years ago
We are alive in this small star.
ottacs 3 years ago
Do you see the Great Wall of China? jejeje...
G0df4ther 3 years ago
OMG I LIVE ON THAT PLANET "earth" OMG MY WHOLE fAMILY LIVES ON THE MOON!!
naruto123567 3 years ago 3
Wow
AsMakeEntertainment 3 years ago 2
wery nice, very nice
scarpredator7 3 years ago
How beautiful is Earth, let's treasure it like a beautiful lady.
eric496312 4 years ago 2
We are. Were f***ing it hard. Everyday.
thuddas 3 years ago 4
"it"? lmao. That's what I call yo mamma.. when I plow her.
MrCanuck 3 years ago
guys, i only want to be on the moon to see this...
anakinskywalker92 4 years ago 2
yeahr, another proof for a flat earth
hollow0rld 4 years ago
look at the beginning look how far earth is & then near the ned earth's so close
mashpatato4 4 years ago
i no yeah, were are the stars???
mashpatato4 4 years ago
NO STARS AGAIN! In the space vacuum, with no obscuring air or dust, STARS ARE VERY BRIGHT! Show a moving star canopy in these videos (over-expose the earth if necessary) and I'll believe the video is genuine. Star canopies are impossible to fake, and enable the exact position of the observer to be calculated. This video is fake. The US controls Japan's space program. This is just another anti-hoax effort by NASA's pals in Japan.
sergemck 4 years ago
yes stars are bright. and the sun is a star!.. it's intense light washes away everything.
tolgatolu 4 years ago 2
Does anyone know what music is being palyed to this film clip?
mariaconda 4 years ago
It's from Brian Eno's Apollo: Atmospheres and Soundtracks. Beautiful album.
Tanru2000 4 years ago
FAKE, why is there no stars, and why doesn't the moon look real. BEcause japan has no rover on the moon. Japanese could never reach the moon. Its just a computer simulation, and a poor one at that.
shanksxy 4 years ago
Japanese could never reach the moon??? I bet you that if there was ANY economical gain on doing it they would have not only reach it, but build buildings for tourism!
joseamirandavelez 4 years ago
youre the dumbest human being on the planet
buttface1202 4 years ago
You are probably a looser that is always watching TV and videos here... I mean, who the hell would call himself buttface...?
joseamirandavelez 4 years ago 4
you're probably right...the aliens ARE japanese...it all makes sense now
mattforce7 4 years ago
i wasnt replying to you genius
but youre the second stupidest human being on the planet
buttface1202 3 years ago
your still a buttface...
joseamirandavelez 3 years ago
you're still illiterate.
buttface1202 3 years ago
The moon is inhabited with thousands of innocent people that are being eaten by Draconians as we...uh...sit here watching YouTube. Let us do something to help them.
bimaii 4 years ago 2
hahaha!
tolgatolu 4 years ago
Down the Draconians!
joseamirandavelez 4 years ago
While watching this clip of the earth -rise I can recall APOLLO 8 as the trio were orbiting the moon on XMAS 1968 AS they were filmig their trip one of them placed his finger over the lens so there was TOTAL DARKNESS as the earth vanished from view And Anders doing the filming said something like "Hey you guys the EARTH has disappeared & we will have to spend the rest of our lives orbiting the moon" As if the earth vanished" And what if the EARTH VAnished
ghs45 4 years ago
Also, keep in mind that the Moon does not have an atmosphere that would distort the size at all. Plus, it looks like the orbiter is about 60 or so miles above the surface.. maybe more... so to say that this si some sort of conspiracy is rubbish..
drarkanex 4 years ago 2
This is so cool man! I remember the last few missions to the moon as a kid in Ohio. Niel Armstrong was my hero! Untill he was replaced by George Lucas.
kapitankartoon 4 years ago
dont you guys think at the earthrise our planet was too small? as if it was farther the the normal and you see it perfectly clear comparing to the earthset
diegoriccio 4 years ago
you have to realize how high the camera is from the moons surface.. look at the curvature of the horizon
BENGALtiger87 4 years ago
i got ur point but i dont think that this difference of altittude between the rise and set would be far enough to make that difference on the "size" of earth
diegoriccio 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i like the way earth doesn't move, it just sits there in a fixed position! man, the people responsible for this fake must think were all thick as S***
3magicbeans 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hmmm. Bored the tits off me
analsore 4 years ago
Whats goin on with these bad scores. Can you trekkies not take a decent comment?
analsore 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hm, i don't know. Looks kinda fake to me. You can do this easily with any 3D animation software, like Maya or 3D Max.
smek2 4 years ago
O M G!! What a 21th Century... =P
Romulo282838 4 years ago 2
Nice =) The pictures of it appeared in the news papers today... it's really interesting...
reanzzzzzzz 4 years ago 2
what is that song? Great video btw
MozarellaFirefox 4 years ago 2
Beautiful piece of music. I would like to know the name, as well.
dafringe 4 years ago
Its by Brian Eno and its called Deep Blue Day.
richardhead 4 years ago
I knew someone would come through with the answer. ;-) Thanks very much for the information.
dafringe 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you mean we're just spinning around and around like fucking idiots in that tiny ball? that's bullshit THIS IS FAKE
alfrenium 4 years ago
Haha, most medieval comment ever.
threedotsdead 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so fake. it's a freakin cartoon.
OrangeOrnage 4 years ago
Oh my orange - you are a moron.
the Japanese spacecraft is up thee - it is equipped with a HDTV camera, and they have been putting these cips up on there site since they began recieving the images.
and you make a comment like that for the whole world to see . . . .
templepriest 4 years ago 9
LOL templepriest PWNED YOU
DISSSSS
lol
SmixProductions 4 years ago
But where to see HDTV version?
laskavy 4 years ago
Oh yeah! I love This planet!
At first glance, this video's seemed to be CG.
natloziarap 4 years ago
By golly, youre right
FunnyTreeCookie 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FIRST COMMENT n00bz
suckithardnfast 4 years ago