Bach müziğiyle insanı parçalarken, sözler insanların isyanını anlatıyor ! Almanca sözleri: Erbarme dich, mein gott, um meiner zähren willen! schaue hier, herz und auge weint vor dir bitterlich. Türkçe tercümesi: Merhamet et, tanrım, akan gözyaşlarımın hatrına bak işte, ağlıyor kalbim ve gözlerim huzurunda acı içinde, merhamet et, tanrım akan gözyaşlarımın hatrına...
so many movies directors have used this music. Ths entirs passion and the b minor mass and so much else liturgical music of Bach is amazing.So much else by other germans of this periodI need to hear.The French too. What was happening in spain and Italy I wonder.Im so lost in Messaienand Boulez I think it is time to reeducate about the earlier models!
Diese Aufnahme gefällt mir besonders gut, weil Sänger und Geiger absolut ebenbürtig sind. Schön, dass die Geige sich nicht in den Vordergrund drängt und die Verzierungen so nebensächlich spielt, wie sie auch gemeint sind.
Listen to as many recordings as you can . Choose which is the best for you today. Each will lead you to a better understanding of Bach and his numenal experience.
Scholl's Version von dieser Musik ist die Beste, vielleicht vergleichbar mit der von Magdalena Kozena. Wie klar spricht aus diesser Musik Bachs tiefe Pietät!
A arte magistral de Bach nessa voz tocante e maravilhosa de Andreas. A arte musical barroca revelada nesse dueto espetacular. Parabéns Scholl! Abs, AlexVivacqua, Brasil
@NilSatis1983 ?!? He was indeed crucified- upside down! He didn't feel dignified enough to be crucified as Jesus was. And it's "you're". You need some schoolin' boy.
My "your" was out of pure laziness, and of course I knew the story about his crucifixion - Caravaggio's depiction of it is epic - I was just making a throw away comment, I mean who knows if it even actually happend? Thanks for replying though.
Bach - well, perfection, really!. I have this recording: Scholl's voice is simply superb and his Erbarme dich is heart-breakingly lovely - it still makes me cry, after countless hearings.
¡INEFABLE! El violín y la inmejorable voz de Scholl compiten juntos por quién expresa mejor el conseguidísimo ambiente de súplica, tristeza y dulzura que no decae en los casi siete minutos que dura. Es sin duda una de las mejores partituras de la historia de la música. GRACIAS BACH
This transcends the realm of the natural. It penetrates the deepest recesses of my being with its soul-stirring emotion and sublime beauty! Thank you so much for posting!
"for a falsetto singer" - um, since you like correcting people...the correct term is falsettist. And I also love how you say that as if it's something sub-standard in pedagogy. He's one of the finest counter-tenors we have in the world.
Ah... what sensitive perfection. How blessed am I that I was not given the acuity of a critic and know so little of the arcane footnotes of history. Each interpretation is a gift of a soul which translates muted letters, lines and dashes to living music. How dull to look at things which are born to fly in a vitrine. My heart breaks open when I hear such a voice and feel the embrace of these well-balanced strings.
ofc it's ''a matter of taste'' but one of the many reasons i'm saying that is because i have never heard anything ugly or ''not as good as'' in Bach's work. Everything is simply amazing, the harmony. But, yes its my opinion
Like Mendelsohnm, you have a very inflated notion of what Bach wanted.
Read Bach's memo to the Leipzig council in which he specified, in detail, how many singers and instrumentalists he wanted to perform his music in each of the Leipzig 4 churches.
He called for 12-16 singers in an SATB choir (and only 1 voice per part in concerted music)!
Not realising that the 55 students at St. Thomas were split among 4 churches, Mendelssohn believed Bach used 55 singers in SATB!
You seem to think that Bach wrote Leipzig church music with the idea that it was going to be performed after he was dead and buried. Why would he think the fate of his music would be different from that of his predecessors? No composer of Bach's time had such Romantic fantasies.
It wasn't until the late 18th c., with the growth of public concerts, that the people acquired a taste for hearing music of dead composers. That was not the case in Bach's day or before.
You (and Gaines?) seem to forget that "Musical Offering" is based on the King's own "tragic" theme, which is in a minor key and has a descending diminished 7th and descending chromatics. How "galant" ("simple and happy", by your definition) is the King's own theme!
Gaines isn't Bach either, or a even a musicologist. He's a journalist with an axe to grind and gives a false spin to the events that led to the composition of "Musical Offering". Contemporary accounts tell a very different story. Bach was not publicly humiliated.
The fact that the work incorporates elements of the Berlin school makes it a tribute, not a rebuke or a parody ("a musical work in which a style is closely imitated for comic effect or in ridicule").
Most the 21st c. orchestra instruments are actually LATE 19th c. versions of 18th c. instruments. Should the modern orchestra upgrade to synthesizers?
People in Bach's day didn't go to church to hear a concert in the sense you mean.
The steady growth of live and recorded HIP performances since the 1960s disproves your claim that historically uninformed performances (HUP) are needed to keep Baroque music alive.
Even a HUP of Baroque music uses a token harpsichord as a grudging concession to authenticity. Why stop with the harpsichord?
What does this prove? That even clueless performances of good music can be moving?
Felix performed SMP in a PUBLIC CONCERT in 1829 ---- 79 years after Bach's death. Not 200 years.
A salient point you miss is that church music is written for the chuch, NOT for public concerts, which is why SMP was not heard in public concerts until groups like London Academy of Ancient Music and Berlin Singakademie sprung up in the 19th c. to promote "ancient" music to the PUBLIC!
You forget that even in the late 18th c. Bach was held in awe in professional circles; Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven had that attitude.
Felix 1st heard SMP at the Berlin Singakademie which was ALREADY performing it PRIVATELY. Felix merely performed it PUBLICLY, in 1829, some 79 years (not 200) after Bach's death.
The Singakademie had acquired large quantities of Bach's music from the estate of CPE Bach.
Bach's music survives on it's own merits, and because the scores survive.
The early music movement of the 20th c. has done more to stimulate interest in early music than all the uninformed "modern" interpretations. Now, even the modern ensembles try to imitate the period ensembles when playing early music.
The diversity you speak of is the result of the wide availabilty of many kinds of music of many periods via recordings and public music libraries.
Most music was composed to CONFORM to the style of the period. And the composer expected it to be played in the style of the period.
"Classical" music is played today due to the shift of primary music consumers from court/town/church/stage (all wanting to hear mainly contemporary music) to the concert going public (wanting to hear "classics").
Today's philharmonics are dominated by "classics". Less than 10% of a season includes new music. Not so in Bach's day.
The pity is that the lack of authenticity (in other performances) gives such a false
impression of the music.
Perhaps you would prefer a lethargic, heavy-handed, sentimental and very unauthentic Bach a la Richter et al, with metal strings and thick Gypsy violin tone.
This performance is slightly faster than some, but works fine since it allows Scholl to sing some phrases in one go that would otherwise *have* to be interrupted, to the detriment of the line.
J.S.Bach - St. Matthew Passion (BWV 244), Aria 'Erbarme dich...' Original text : Erbarme dich, mein Gott, Um meiner Zähren Willen ! Shaue hier, Herz und Auge Weint vor dir bitterlich. Erbarme dich, mein Gott ! An English translation: Have mercy, my God, For the sake of my tears ! See here, heart an eye Weep bitterly before you. Have mercy, my God !
It must have happened that, back when god was god and the word bore meaning, something within people, probably fervour, made them build the most solemn, truthfully transparent, painful compositions. I don't suppose it was really a god that gave them the talent, but rather their own desire and passion. Alas, that we lack today.
I prefer this aria in performance of counter-tenor.I think female voice wouldnt sound so..sincerely and heartbreaking.. Andreas Scholl is wonderfull..
The greatest composer with the greatest counter tenor what a combination
ThePastorale 2 weeks ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
beautifull and touches me right inside! Andreas did a real great job and makes it sound so easy and natural...
but these nativity images ... ??
Fratello047 1 month ago
wer um Gottes Willen hat auf "gefällt mir nicht" geklickt??????
gRoBAtube 1 month ago
Zum Heulen schön.....Eine der schönsten Interpretationen.
christschuh 2 months ago
trxdesigner 3 months ago 2
Beautiful!
Evilbitch666 4 months ago
and it's SCHOLL not school
DiVeronica 6 months ago
Erbarme dich,
Mein Gott, um meiner Zähren willen!
Schaue hier,
Herz und Auge weint vor dir
Bitterlich.
Have mercy Lord,
My God, because of this my weeping!
Look thou here,
Heart and eyes now weep for thee
Bitterly.
DiVeronica 7 months ago 3
very beautiful paintings, but all about Jesus' birth, but this song is about when Peter denied Jesus????
And by the way t4ilzz, I cant agree with you more!! :D
kvarkarn2 7 months ago
Why the pictures of the Nativity, when this is music from a Passion? But at least the music is perfection!
FrancescaHuemer 7 months ago
Unglaublich !
Augen zu und in eine andere Welt gleiten - einfach nur geniesen.
Dessinfektion 7 months ago 2
Was für eine Stimme und was für eine Interpretation ! Andreas Scholl zählt für mich zu den besten Countertenören der Welt...
Oberlahnsteiner 7 months ago 2
@Oberlahnsteiner
Ich bien mit dir eiversteinden!..Ich bien eine französiche Logopede..in Strassburg..
odilebams 3 months ago
Of all the recordings posted on youtube this is one of the best.. you really find rest
jmkroczek 9 months ago
so many movies directors have used this music. Ths entirs passion and the b minor mass and so much else liturgical music of Bach is amazing.So much else by other germans of this periodI need to hear.The French too. What was happening in spain and Italy I wonder.Im so lost in Messaienand Boulez I think it is time to reeducate about the earlier models!
lovesGenet 9 months ago
divin...celeste...emouvant...
matteoelkhodr 10 months ago
Diese Aufnahme gefällt mir besonders gut, weil Sänger und Geiger absolut ebenbürtig sind. Schön, dass die Geige sich nicht in den Vordergrund drängt und die Verzierungen so nebensächlich spielt, wie sie auch gemeint sind.
seelenlerche 10 months ago
This is not from the Weihnachtsoratorium - why did you choose pictures of Christmas?
Who is the conductor?
Duvircsa 10 months ago
His name is spelled "Scholl" not "School"
DarkFairy003 10 months ago 2
isnt is too fast?
baharsahin 1 year ago
too fast tempo, this is not a disco...
HookedOnBach 1 year ago
@HookedOnBach
Das ist genau das richtige Tempo, kein bisschen zu schnell.
seelenlerche 10 months ago
too fast tempo, it is not disco...
HookedOnBach 1 year ago
@HookedOnBach What? disco? What are you trying to say?
It's not too fast, never!! This is a proper tempo.
You may have heard too slow performance.
Musicabarocco 10 months ago
Listen to as many recordings as you can . Choose which is the best for you today. Each will lead you to a better understanding of Bach and his numenal experience.
phuckmycuntt 1 year ago
I got goosebumps
themurge 1 year ago
Yes, Bach is the BEST...another gorgeous version of this aria: Eula Beal!
Brunnhilde66 1 year ago
Scholl's Version von dieser Musik ist die Beste, vielleicht vergleichbar mit der von Magdalena Kozena. Wie klar spricht aus diesser Musik Bachs tiefe Pietät!
arossle 1 year ago
one of the best interpretations ever! Scholl belongs to a another league of artists... a real 5 stars singer!
ibk1980 1 year ago 13
He is indeed born to sing religious music... the innocence in his sound is astonishing
LohengrinT 1 year ago 4
Thank goodness for the singer's lack of "overdone" vibrato - a nice change!
hootersnooter 1 year ago 2
The 2 dislikes have no heart, ear, or should see an eye doctor for pressing the wrong button.
This is what probably plays in heaven.
pakvasevigreste 1 year ago 13
@pakvasevigreste They have no heart of eye problem. Tthey are tone deaf.
simcha181818 1 year ago
A arte magistral de Bach nessa voz tocante e maravilhosa de Andreas. A arte musical barroca revelada nesse dueto espetacular. Parabéns Scholl! Abs, AlexVivacqua, Brasil
alexvivacqua 1 year ago
This is so beautiful!
ekeiram00 1 year ago
Peter stop crying you biff, so what you denied the lord, at least your not going to be nailed to a tree
NilSatis1983 1 year ago
@NilSatis1983 ?!? He was indeed crucified- upside down! He didn't feel dignified enough to be crucified as Jesus was. And it's "you're". You need some schoolin' boy.
HerbicidalManiac 1 year ago
My "your" was out of pure laziness, and of course I knew the story about his crucifixion - Caravaggio's depiction of it is epic - I was just making a throw away comment, I mean who knows if it even actually happend? Thanks for replying though.
NilSatis1983 1 year ago
Beautiful. Great Bach. But the best version I've ever heard is Nicholas Spanos's. That is just otherworldly. The most beautiful voice.
tamerlano236 1 year ago
Scholl*
starbreez3 1 year ago 4
Die eerste noot die Scholl zingt, dringt tot diep in je ziel naar Binnen!
MultiKwakwa 1 year ago
School ist cool! - Scholl ist wunderbar! - Ich vermisse die Pizzicati! -
tritonusgesang 1 year ago
Awesome! A gem of gems.
paulostroff99 1 year ago
Bach - well, perfection, really!. I have this recording: Scholl's voice is simply superb and his Erbarme dich is heart-breakingly lovely - it still makes me cry, after countless hearings.
yezdnil 1 year ago
The VERY Best, the god of all composers...
robertcouturier 1 year ago 4
bach ist immer schön
tromporg 1 year ago
¡INEFABLE! El violín y la inmejorable voz de Scholl compiten juntos por quién expresa mejor el conseguidísimo ambiente de súplica, tristeza y dulzura que no decae en los casi siete minutos que dura. Es sin duda una de las mejores partituras de la historia de la música. GRACIAS BACH
latimowr 1 year ago 3
goosebumps
Arpeggio 1 year ago
This transcends the realm of the natural. It penetrates the deepest recesses of my being with its soul-stirring emotion and sublime beauty! Thank you so much for posting!
jglarance 1 year ago 4
What a Divine Music ! And a Divine Voice !!! More than brilliant ....
TheAaronmoses 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please, which orchestra is it, and who is playing the violin obbligato?
tessrosed 1 year ago
Please, which orchestra is it, and who is playing the violin obbligato?
tessrosed 1 year ago
@tessrosed
I believe this is the recording by Philippe Herreweghe/Collegium Vocale Gent (1998). My favorite :-)
bbstenornl 1 year ago
@bbstenornl 'tis the Herreweghe! My Fav too!
Abmin9 1 year ago
Ontroerende versie......
TheEsoxLucius 1 year ago 4
supernatural beauty
marquisevirginie 2 years ago
andreas scholl?????
diemen10 2 years ago
A nadie importa su nombre tanto como su voce.
marisolex119 2 years ago
Wow...the clarity....
StolenkissGerbils 2 years ago 4
NADIE, absolutamente NADIE canta mejor Erbarme Dich que Andres Scholl y vaya que he escuchado varias versiones! Thank you for your work, is great!
publicidadymedios 2 years ago 4
*Andreas*, sorry!
publicidadymedios 2 years ago
así es... y canta con sentimiento, le mete el feeling de acuerdo a lo que canta y a la intensidad de cada parte en la música.
cdwheel 2 years ago
Impressionant,no se si quedar-me amb aquesta versió o amb la habitual per mezzo...
FERRAN (malalt de Bach)
des de Barcelona (Catalunya)
JaumeFerran 2 years ago
Matthaus rip thanks 4 this...
gorepeace 2 years ago
A very good and appropriate performance, just
slightly to fast. This is the correct way it should
be performed. Please listen and learn.
HowardJohnstone 2 years ago 3
"for a falsetto singer" - um, since you like correcting people...the correct term is falsettist. And I also love how you say that as if it's something sub-standard in pedagogy. He's one of the finest counter-tenors we have in the world.
GeminiAmbience 2 years ago 2
GeminiAmbiance, you are absolutely right, and I hope you could mantein your fine sense of humour. Sorry for my bad English.
polifemo1970 2 years ago
Bach is the greatest. All Glories to the Lord!
bennybuy 2 years ago
totally awesome, simply drives me mad
marquisevirginie 2 years ago 3
Ah... what sensitive perfection. How blessed am I that I was not given the acuity of a critic and know so little of the arcane footnotes of history. Each interpretation is a gift of a soul which translates muted letters, lines and dashes to living music. How dull to look at things which are born to fly in a vitrine. My heart breaks open when I hear such a voice and feel the embrace of these well-balanced strings.
MarasVeil 2 years ago 24
I cannot describe my impression better than that. Thank you for sharing this.
RowanFortuneWood 2 years ago 5
wow!!! thats the best performance of this piece evvver!!!
Viktoriaviolin 3 years ago 5
Bach is simply the best composer ever... Nothing else i have to mention! And i know i'm right
t4ilzz 3 years ago 91
in your personal opinion yes
for me he is one of the best
others i like are Rachmaninoff, Schubert, Beethoven, Liszt and many more
n1bigdaddy 2 years ago
ofc it's ''a matter of taste'' but one of the many reasons i'm saying that is because i have never heard anything ugly or ''not as good as'' in Bach's work. Everything is simply amazing, the harmony. But, yes its my opinion
t4ilzz 2 years ago 3
@t4ilzz
I'm TOTALLY agree with u...
derblaueangst 1 year ago
@t4ilzz
And I simply agree.
Ingar
ingarkringen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@t4ilzz Surely YOU ARE RIGHT :)
beholt 1 year ago
@t4ilzz You ARE RIGHT indded :)
Composer, that we can listen all live long - and it would be not enaugh...
beholt 1 year ago
@t4ilzz I coudn't have said it better myself.
unikatnoime 1 year ago
@t4ilzz - yes you are.
AlsatianCousin 11 months ago
@t4ilzz Perfect statement!!! Bravo!
Daphne108 10 months ago
Like Mendelsohnm, you have a very inflated notion of what Bach wanted.
Read Bach's memo to the Leipzig council in which he specified, in detail, how many singers and instrumentalists he wanted to perform his music in each of the Leipzig 4 churches.
He called for 12-16 singers in an SATB choir (and only 1 voice per part in concerted music)!
Not realising that the 55 students at St. Thomas were split among 4 churches, Mendelssohn believed Bach used 55 singers in SATB!
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
You seem to think that Bach wrote Leipzig church music with the idea that it was going to be performed after he was dead and buried. Why would he think the fate of his music would be different from that of his predecessors? No composer of Bach's time had such Romantic fantasies.
It wasn't until the late 18th c., with the growth of public concerts, that the people acquired a taste for hearing music of dead composers. That was not the case in Bach's day or before.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Just who are these "non-pros" you speak of that didn't appreciate his music? What were their names?
In "the last portion of his life" Bach gave weekly PUBLIC concerts in Leipzig as Zimmermann's Coffehouse.
According to Zedler's "Great Musical Lexicon" of 1739, "the Bachian Collegium Musicum is more famous that all others."
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
In the memo you cite he does not say he never has enough qualified musicians.
He says that SOME of the musicians from the St. Thomas School and the appointed town musicians are inadequate.
He says he has to meet the needs not supplied by the Thomaschule by asking University students to fill in without pay.
But this situation does not reflect his experience in Muehlhausen, Arnstadt, Weimar or Coethen, or with the Leipzig Collegium Musicum he directed.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
In the memo you cite Bach spcifies what he needed for Leipzig church music:
3-4 voices per part (1 voice per part in concerted music), 2-3 violin1, 2-3 violin2, 2 viola1, 2 viola2, 2 cellos, 1 violone, 2-3 oboes, 1-2 bassons, 3 trumpets, 1 kettledrums, 2 flutists/recordists.
The King's own theme in "Musical Offering" has nothing to do with "happiness" or "simplicity".
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
The use of modern instruments tends to "stifle" Baroque expression, but is very good for Late Romantic expression :)
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
You forget that the performers in this aria are themselves professional musicians.
I've heard many performances of this aria at similar tempos to this performance. There's nothing fast about this performance.
Everyone -- whether professional or amateur, whether clueless or historically informed --- has an OPINION about tempo.
Where do you get the idea that period instruments "stifle expression". And what do you mean by "expression"? Late 19th c. Romanticism?
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Musical scores survive even if you never play them.
SMP (and other fine music) does not "survive" because it is played.
It is played because it worth playing.
It "survives" on its own merits.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Yes, you did say SMP's "composition" was 200 years before Mendelssohn performance.
But you are still mistaken.
SMP was composed in 1727 and performed many times in Bach's lifetime --- and subsequently -- IN Leipzig.
The 1st known public performance OUTSIDE Leipzig was conducted by Mendelssohn in 1829,.
which is still only 102 years after it's composition.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
You (and Gaines?) seem to forget that "Musical Offering" is based on the King's own "tragic" theme, which is in a minor key and has a descending diminished 7th and descending chromatics. How "galant" ("simple and happy", by your definition) is the King's own theme!
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Gaines isn't Bach either, or a even a musicologist. He's a journalist with an axe to grind and gives a false spin to the events that led to the composition of "Musical Offering". Contemporary accounts tell a very different story. Bach was not publicly humiliated.
The fact that the work incorporates elements of the Berlin school makes it a tribute, not a rebuke or a parody ("a musical work in which a style is closely imitated for comic effect or in ridicule").
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Well, there you go. If you think organ music should be played on piano, then why not on a synthesizer?
You do know that some synthesizers can be programmed from live sounds sources? Sounds like the real thing, too.
Surely you advocate the modern orchestra "upgrading" from those stodgy old late 19th c. instruments to modern electronic instruments.
This would make early music available to even more people to play in their homes, cluelessly, but with unlimited freedom of expression.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
There will always be clueless listeners who will enjoy clueless performances.
But that is not a justification for clueless performances.
Not all of us have pipe organs either. Does that mean Bach's organ music should be played on piano?
Even Mendelssohn used gut strings! Metal strings were not introduced until well after 1900, and not in general use until after WW2.
Most of the 21st c. orchestra instruments are actually 19th c. instruments. Should they upgrade to synthesizers?
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Correction.
Most the 21st c. orchestra instruments are actually LATE 19th c. versions of 18th c. instruments. Should the modern orchestra upgrade to synthesizers?
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
SMP was not written for public concerts.
People in Bach's day didn't go to church to hear a concert in the sense you mean.
The steady growth of live and recorded HIP performances since the 1960s disproves your claim that historically uninformed performances (HUP) are needed to keep Baroque music alive.
Even a HUP of Baroque music uses a token harpsichord as a grudging concession to authenticity. Why stop with the harpsichord?
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
You're mistaken again.
SMP was 1st performed in 1727, which is about 100 years before Felix's 1829 public concert.
What does popularity have to do with the price of rice?
You seem to think Bach entered his music into a popularity contest.
"Pop" music is more popular than anything Bach wrote.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago 2
Your quotation is from his memo to the Leipzig council in which he specified the resources needed to perform church music at Leipzig.
Apart from Leipzig, list the employerS and placeS where he had INSUFFICIENT resources. State your sources.
Define "Galant" style". And don't say it means "simple and happy". Give a musical example.
Define "parody" and name one piece in which he "parodied" what you keep calling the "Galant" style.
Which instruments did he use that he didn't like?
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
What does this prove? That even clueless performances of good music can be moving?
Felix performed SMP in a PUBLIC CONCERT in 1829 ---- 79 years after Bach's death. Not 200 years.
A salient point you miss is that church music is written for the chuch, NOT for public concerts, which is why SMP was not heard in public concerts until groups like London Academy of Ancient Music and Berlin Singakademie sprung up in the 19th c. to promote "ancient" music to the PUBLIC!
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
You forget that even in the late 18th c. Bach was held in awe in professional circles; Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven had that attitude.
Felix 1st heard SMP at the Berlin Singakademie which was ALREADY performing it PRIVATELY. Felix merely performed it PUBLICLY, in 1829, some 79 years (not 200) after Bach's death.
The Singakademie had acquired large quantities of Bach's music from the estate of CPE Bach.
Bach's music survives on it's own merits, and because the scores survive.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
At Weimar and Coethen Bach had the finest musicians.
His memo to the Leipzig council details exactly how many musicians he needed for each church, for voices and instruments!
Bach himself used some elements of what you call "galant style", particularly in his later years.
You are trying to confuse style of composition /w performance practice. Not on my watch.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
NO.
Music survives on it's own merits.
The early music movement of the 20th c. has done more to stimulate interest in early music than all the uninformed "modern" interpretations. Now, even the modern ensembles try to imitate the period ensembles when playing early music.
The diversity you speak of is the result of the wide availabilty of many kinds of music of many periods via recordings and public music libraries.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
NO.
Most music was composed to CONFORM to the style of the period. And the composer expected it to be played in the style of the period.
"Classical" music is played today due to the shift of primary music consumers from court/town/church/stage (all wanting to hear mainly contemporary music) to the concert going public (wanting to hear "classics").
Today's philharmonics are dominated by "classics". Less than 10% of a season includes new music. Not so in Bach's day.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
The "interpreter's desired sound and form" should never be left to his arbitrary discretion.
His interpretation must always conform to the style of the period.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
The role of the performer is to realize the composer's intentions, not his own.
You don't realize the intentions of a Baroque composer by performing his music in the style of Wagner.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
By definition, "interpretation" is up to the interpreter.
But that is not a license to set aside historic performance practices for the sake of the interpreter's personal preferences.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Late 19th century notions of "expression" have no place in early music.
Historic authenticity should never be sacrificed on the altar of "expression".
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
I don't think any expression is being stifled.
The pity is that the lack of authenticity (in other performances) gives such a false
impression of the music.
Perhaps you would prefer a lethargic, heavy-handed, sentimental and very unauthentic Bach a la Richter et al, with metal strings and thick Gypsy violin tone.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
To TomosTaffers: expression is our ear-problem. I hear it in my heart much deeper when expression is not so loud. Don't you?
HerrvonFreizeit 3 years ago
Comment removed
asjoma 3 years ago 2
Ay raigekimaru Ay Ay... try to listen this version in a cd in stereo instead of the net. Is to cry... Sublime.
xtnz 3 years ago
good but too fast (this song is begging for forgiveness from God, it's not something you in a fast paced manner)
raigekimaru 3 years ago
You try singing it, then.
There's only so much breath in one's lungs.
This performance is slightly faster than some, but works fine since it allows Scholl to sing some phrases in one go that would otherwise *have* to be interrupted, to the detriment of the line.
molealto 2 years ago 3
wonderful voice and beautiful music
charpini 3 years ago
I´M LOVING IT!!
srjdj 3 years ago 2
dies1domini 3 years ago 19
Thank you very much for the original text and the English translation. It was so kind of you.
Nattyduck 3 years ago
@dies1domini -TY for the translation.
paulostroff99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heart heart
im so HORNY!! wow! hehe. XJ
nph88 3 years ago
Stunningly beautiful!
mradaChris 3 years ago 10
Technically perfect voice, no pain to be heard.
No pain at all.
Perhaps that is what happens when a male voice emulates a female voice.
Any answers or replies? Please write to @Kultur-Barbar
cocochanelleke 3 years ago
this voice is so full of sound and live...bravo!
tastibasti 3 years ago 3
It must have happened that, back when god was god and the word bore meaning, something within people, probably fervour, made them build the most solemn, truthfully transparent, painful compositions. I don't suppose it was really a god that gave them the talent, but rather their own desire and passion. Alas, that we lack today.
echlyn 3 years ago 3
psssstt...it's "Scholl" ;)
I think you should change the title, ok?
Thx for this beautifull interpretation.
Paajtor 3 years ago
unbelievebal beautiful !!
hohnerbubb 3 years ago 9
This is the most beautiful song and music I have ever heard in my life. So deeply moving
and passionate. It moves me to tears whenever
I hear it. No other voice but Scholl's would
suffice for this blessed composition of Bachs!
jglarance 3 years ago 9
Andreas Scholl takes my breath away. Such beauty. Thank you.
picklevalentine 3 years ago 6
and just listen to the fazing "such talent"
rudly 3 years ago
Bach would have wept with joy to hear this beautiful interpretation after the vibrato-laden and extroverted past 150 years of Romantic performance.
DerWandrer 3 years ago 6
this is wonderful. listening to this almost makes me want to become a christian.
Timrath 3 years ago 8
I prefer this aria in performance of counter-tenor.I think female voice wouldnt sound so..sincerely and heartbreaking.. Andreas Scholl is wonderfull..
rosovavoda 4 years ago 10
Thank you my god for this voice.
Stina1972 4 years ago 13
he is good
kiya3 4 years ago 2
gracias
celticry 4 years ago
Andreas Scholl est un des meilleurs sans doute. Admirable. Merci
michelmans 4 years ago 5
He is best singer of all baroque :)
rosenberyou 4 years ago 7
'Have mercy, my God, for my tears' sake;
Look here my heart and eyes weep bitterly before you.
Have mercy, my God, for my tears' sake'
It's so beautiful we can feel The Greatness of Bach with the best aria...
Andreas Scholl's singing is divine... he is the best Bach singer. It is clear for me and for many people.
Indeed, your video is beautiful!
Thank you, dear friend .
BachLoveNat 4 years ago 3
May i know who is the conductor?
flute1982 4 years ago 5
conductor Philippe Herreweghe.
essenciademusica 4 years ago
a angel singing!
essenciademusica 4 years ago 2
yes
BachLoveNat 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so beautiful, thanks..
lasultanica 4 years ago 5