Awesome, we humans just need to grow gills and go live in the sea. Bullets wont do shit and gun laws wont mater anymore. Then we can sneak back on to land with a cooler bottle of sea water on our heads and shoot whatever the fuck we want!!!
oh I guess the bullet has to start in the air to gain velocity. if you shoot a bullet in the water from the air it will go further since it has more velocity then if you shoot the bullet under the water first.
this is a cool video... water is the awesomest bullet killer ..so those scenes in movies where gun shots under water are shown are fake? where they kill the guy 30 feet under water?
When a bullet has time to gain momentum through the air and then into water rather then being suppressed immediatly as it is fired from in the water, will it travel further in the water? Anybody know?
@frankielo1 It will travel less. Hitting the surface will be like hitting a wall (due to surface tension). Also, all of the energy output is underwate, trather than loosing energy in the air before entering the water.
@frankielo1 Put it this way. Will you run through watter farther if you just ran 50 feet on stable ground before you enter the water? No. You will lose energy running 50 feet on stable ground, thus you will have less energy to run under water.
@smokey04200420 I questioned this because if I jump from a bridge feet first into the river I will sink maybe 20 feet. If I jump from the bow of the boat feet first I just go a few feet. The speed of gravity being the energy difference. I dont disagree with you but it was that principle that made me question. Thanks
@frankielo1 Oh, I see what you mean now. In this case gravity is cancelled out by air friction. Any object experiencing freefall drop (not shot or thown downwards) in our atmosphere is subject to "Terminal Velocity" for humans it is about 120mph. In other words, you cannot fall any faster than 120mph because of air friction (at that speed, your mass and gravity do not have enough force to pull you through the air). With ammunition, the terminal velocity would be much less.
@smokey04200420 So imagine that the bullet was shot through space (and not air). The velocity of a 9mm round is 1300fps. Lets say tat I shot the round from 1300ft away from the water (downwards into the water) it would take the round 1 second to create impact with the wate. Given tat gravity pulls the round down by 32ftpssq, the velocity of the round before impaact will be 1300+32 or 1332ftps. Now imagine that there is no surface tension in the water. 1300 to 1332 is not much.
@smokey04200420 So given that the round is shot in space, and the round is shaped that it breaks 100% of the surface tension without loosing any velocity or omntum, then yes, your theory will hold and it will go that tiny little bit farther. In fact it will go 100%(1332/1300) or just less than 2.5% faster before hitting the water. But since we DO have air friction and surface tension, it will travel much slower when making impact. I hope that this answers your question.
@smokey04200420 oh just so your aware faster the bullet travels the faster the bullet is slowed down by the water, so if you were to shoot a .50 cal the bullet really isnt gonna go anywhere.
a hollow point bullet in water gets peeled apart almost instantly when shot in water and probably never reaches the target.
full metal jacketed bullets would probably be a lot more effective under water, but I can imagine they would deviate a lot from a straight trajectory. because of the nature of water swirls are extremely random, and the gyrostabilization of the bullet spin has little to no effect under water.
I personally can't stand the Glock. I don't know what the big deal is about them because it's the worst balanced pistol I've ever held and fired & they are ugly as hell. Nothing beats the Smith & Wesson .45 or the Sig 9mm.
@SBwingman CLP can only work but so many miracles we used to use it in the Marines....its gonna take some elbow grease too which is why I said it gonna be fun when it rusts.
@jmarine1981 Most definitely, I just assume that someone choosing to subject their firearm to being submerged is prepared to take it down all the way, fully dry it, clean it and oil it immediately after.
I would be concerned about making sure I rinsed off any residue from the chlorinated pool water though, then give everything a nice quick drying with a heat gun.
It's like shooting into water as well. It's the same thing. If a person is underwater and the shooter is above water all u need to do is atleast get 2-3ft underwater And your safe.
Why is everyone bitching about the shooter going deaf he is wearing underwater ear plugs and with those things you can hear the blood running through your veins.
If the tick from a miniscule watch escapement can easily be heard at a distance underwater, shouldn't the explosive force of anything that goes BOOM shatter his face or something?
@Ps35176 Sound travels through solids and liquids easier than air because of the distance between individual atoms/molecules. So in theory you would be right... If the blast was much larger, but the bang we associate with gun is actually just the sound of the gases expanding inside. No shockwave of substantial power is produced by any handgun or rifle for that matter. I'm sure as you got up into the cannons and such it would be a different story though.
Shockwaves travel through liquid far more efficiently than they do through gas (a ticking watch can be heard 30 feet away whilst submerged), so why does this not rupture his eardrums?
@vf12497439 No because the "gas" of the round being propelled is louder in thin air than it would be underwater. Because water contains less air. The sound of the gas escaping would be in a bubble thus acting like a suppressor. I'd be more worried about the concussion of the round.
@UrbanLeopard13 that was a strange explanation.... you got so scientific i had to google it. lets put it this way, you can hear your joints clicking as you swim underwater in a swimming pool? lets set off a M-80 while your in that pool. kills fish
@vf12497439 there are dynamics involved here i dont understand, I do know that a 12 gauge shot gun shell with canon fuse is suffitient to go fishing with, salmon fishing!
@pkfrisko29 Yes. There would be enough force between the barrel of the glock and about 18 inches of water, anything past about 18 inches would only bruise someone if the bullet wouldn't spin out of control first.
Rahj an MP5 generally is chambered in 9mm.... Also the ballistics of a 9 mm far exceed those of a .45. I'm sure any firearms instructor or someone on the range for a minute would also know that. Just some words.
@FPVUAV it really normally shoot since its only a 9mm, try that with a 45 or any high powered firearm like an mp5 etc. that guy will be ruptured itself.
Most guns do this and the bullet goes no where for like 1-2 feet. People should NOT perpetuate a myth that the bullets go further underwater as if Glock has a magic touch. Some pistols will NOT shoot underwater because of defects in firing mechanism, but for those that will fire it does NOT mean the bullets have some great efficacy when discharged underwater.
I was always wondering whether the barrel would explode as the bullet leaving it's casing would have to displace the water in the barrel at about a 1000 fps... Have you tried it with another blowback firearm like a .45 ACP? How was the carbon buildup in the barrel? Were also the brass deformed? Was also surprised that the firearm actually cycled, given that the ejected shell would be slowed down by the surrounding water... Perhaps, the escaping gases created an air-pocket, allowing the she
The Russians developed a firearm specifically for underwater work. The bullets look more like nails than traditional bullets but the range was still under twenty meters if memory serves.
Moral of the story: If your going to shoot someone under water make sure the barrel is up against(or within a few inches of) them before you pull the trigger!
@startingsprinter yes there is a difference. When he shot it underwater, the bullet had to travel through the water. The water represents resisitance. Now imagine standing on a boat shooting down into the water. The bullet travels through the air, building up momentum before penetrating the water. Heavy resistance is only encountered when the bullet enters the water, thus slowing it down.
@TheCookiemonster1822 The bullet doesn't build up momentum while travelling through the air. It's moving faster than terminal velocity, which means drag decelerates it more than gravitation can accelerate it even if it's going straight down.
@startingsprinter They did these test also with mythbusters and shooting into water doesn't do well either because the bullet hits the water mass and stops just as fast.
So probably also a Hollywood myth when you see guys getting shot under water from bad guys shooting from a boat :P
@AgentBO Actually no, because the bullet gains significant velocity before it hits the water. Think of it this way, do you hit the bottom of the pool faster when you jump off of a 9 foot waterfall that's above water or one you jump off of that's below water?
@startingsprinter these bullets started out under water making them slower. a gun shot in normal conditions will go alot faster and will be able to go through water like in the movie.
I will have to try this in my Apartment Complex's Pool. Okay... J/K
NETWizzJbirk 1 hour ago
lol the first shot i thought the bullet just fell out the barrel but it was the brass
conrad0102 2 hours ago
Awesome, we humans just need to grow gills and go live in the sea. Bullets wont do shit and gun laws wont mater anymore. Then we can sneak back on to land with a cooler bottle of sea water on our heads and shoot whatever the fuck we want!!!
(tell me its not genius lmfao)
thirdarc 10 hours ago
Given how often Glocks seem to blowup for no reason, giving one to is pretty ballsy! Good to see you didn't get hurt.
LordGodStronghold 1 day ago
Interesting...!!
cereceros 1 day ago
We all live in a yellow submarine! The Beatles are awesome
TheKj7890 1 day ago
Thanks, would have been better with a hot girl shooting it.
Cslacko 1 day ago
@Cslacko Girls are always prettier with a giant rebreather in front of their face.
Also little bounce underwater because of buoyancy. Derp.
canadianelite42 1 day ago
oh I guess the bullet has to start in the air to gain velocity. if you shoot a bullet in the water from the air it will go further since it has more velocity then if you shoot the bullet under the water first.
FisherVictoria 2 days ago
this is a cool video... water is the awesomest bullet killer ..so those scenes in movies where gun shots under water are shown are fake? where they kill the guy 30 feet under water?
FisherVictoria 2 days ago
hahaha love the top comments
MermaidLogger 2 days ago
I Were wondering... can you shoot a rocket underwater?
Attewir 2 days ago 2
so you can't use a glock to kill a shark?
buckwheat40 2 days ago
@buckwheat40 not shark but sharky :)
Attewir 2 days ago
Nice
glocklover1000 2 days ago
Lol, Fail.
12ZELDALINK 2 days ago
I bet someone is gonna try and be cool by standing 3-4 feet away while some guy shoots at him underwater. Tsk tsk.
Anonymous2335 3 days ago
Congrats! your both fags
Ryan1235beanz 3 days ago
.....whats a Glock ..? I feel smart !! .-.
AirPlanes933 3 days ago
whoever is top comment is a fag
SuperGhost1904 3 days ago 100
Congratulations, You're a fag :D
12ZELDALINK 3 days ago 63
@12ZELDALINK and no you r too!
railman2015 2 days ago
@12ZELDALINK ROTFLMFAO!!!!
sspeed112579 1 day ago
@12ZELDALINK careful. you're next in line :P
ramman4488 1 day ago
@12ZELDALINK aww shit
SuperGhost1904 1 day ago
@12ZELDALINK SO ARE U
titobeast 18 hours ago
@SuperGhost1904 lol, fail.
hifisterio 2 days ago
@SuperGhost1904 LOL nice way to get top comment ..you faggot.
FisherVictoria 2 days ago
@SuperGhost1904 Your top comment!CONGRATS!your a fag :D
boxheadnetwork2 1 day ago
@SuperGhost1904 sry but ist u
2010muddog 2 hours ago
"still a 2 inch group" made me lol
SamuraiX6288 4 days ago
When a bullet has time to gain momentum through the air and then into water rather then being suppressed immediatly as it is fired from in the water, will it travel further in the water? Anybody know?
frankielo1 5 days ago
@frankielo1 It will travel less. Hitting the surface will be like hitting a wall (due to surface tension). Also, all of the energy output is underwate, trather than loosing energy in the air before entering the water.
smokey04200420 5 days ago
@smokey04200420 Thanks.
frankielo1 5 days ago
@smokey04200420 I guess gravity is canceled out by the surface tension.
frankielo1 5 days ago
@frankielo1 Put it this way. Will you run through watter farther if you just ran 50 feet on stable ground before you enter the water? No. You will lose energy running 50 feet on stable ground, thus you will have less energy to run under water.
smokey04200420 5 days ago
@smokey04200420 I questioned this because if I jump from a bridge feet first into the river I will sink maybe 20 feet. If I jump from the bow of the boat feet first I just go a few feet. The speed of gravity being the energy difference. I dont disagree with you but it was that principle that made me question. Thanks
frankielo1 5 days ago
@frankielo1 Oh, I see what you mean now. In this case gravity is cancelled out by air friction. Any object experiencing freefall drop (not shot or thown downwards) in our atmosphere is subject to "Terminal Velocity" for humans it is about 120mph. In other words, you cannot fall any faster than 120mph because of air friction (at that speed, your mass and gravity do not have enough force to pull you through the air). With ammunition, the terminal velocity would be much less.
smokey04200420 4 days ago
@smokey04200420 So imagine that the bullet was shot through space (and not air). The velocity of a 9mm round is 1300fps. Lets say tat I shot the round from 1300ft away from the water (downwards into the water) it would take the round 1 second to create impact with the wate. Given tat gravity pulls the round down by 32ftpssq, the velocity of the round before impaact will be 1300+32 or 1332ftps. Now imagine that there is no surface tension in the water. 1300 to 1332 is not much.
smokey04200420 4 days ago
@smokey04200420 So given that the round is shot in space, and the round is shaped that it breaks 100% of the surface tension without loosing any velocity or omntum, then yes, your theory will hold and it will go that tiny little bit farther. In fact it will go 100%(1332/1300) or just less than 2.5% faster before hitting the water. But since we DO have air friction and surface tension, it will travel much slower when making impact. I hope that this answers your question.
smokey04200420 4 days ago
@smokey04200420 oh just so your aware faster the bullet travels the faster the bullet is slowed down by the water, so if you were to shoot a .50 cal the bullet really isnt gonna go anywhere.
sspeed112579 1 day ago
Amazing!
PaintballSpecialOps 5 days ago
Not only does it fire, but cycles properly as well!
Just2Evil 6 days ago
@Just2Evil Why wouldn't it?
smokey04200420 4 days ago
YELLOW SUBMARINE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrWalshing 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I thought the pressure wave would damage eardrums more easily down there, since sound travels faster underwater. How did it feel?
PhantomP63 6 days ago
yellow submarine is there piss in it or something?
TheRapidShell 1 week ago
that proves the crappy use of a glock..... i would rather use a .22 pistol underwater instead of a crappy glock
wii81ad 1 week ago
Wow!
jpreciado223 1 week ago
So that y in action movies they always jump into the Sea and survives from a whole Army shootin at them.....
somno98 1 week ago
a hollow point bullet in water gets peeled apart almost instantly when shot in water and probably never reaches the target.
full metal jacketed bullets would probably be a lot more effective under water, but I can imagine they would deviate a lot from a straight trajectory. because of the nature of water swirls are extremely random, and the gyrostabilization of the bullet spin has little to no effect under water.
MrJohnDevour 1 week ago
I personally can't stand the Glock. I don't know what the big deal is about them because it's the worst balanced pistol I've ever held and fired & they are ugly as hell. Nothing beats the Smith & Wesson .45 or the Sig 9mm.
MisterTecumseh 1 week ago
the beatles are devil worshipers just so you know
donnyishigh 1 week ago
@donnyishigh Right....
andybpiano 1 week ago
@donnyishigh Not True, But What Is True Is That Your Mom Worships My Cock
bryanisweird1298 1 week ago
I like how he goes to cock the gun back after the first shot and he's totally like oh yeah im shooting a glock hahahahaha.
miket9942 1 week ago
thats gonna be fun when it rusts...
jmarine1981 1 week ago
@jmarine1981 Are you not familiar with Break Free CLP?
SBwingman 1 week ago
@SBwingman CLP can only work but so many miracles we used to use it in the Marines....its gonna take some elbow grease too which is why I said it gonna be fun when it rusts.
jmarine1981 1 week ago
@jmarine1981 Most definitely, I just assume that someone choosing to subject their firearm to being submerged is prepared to take it down all the way, fully dry it, clean it and oil it immediately after.
I would be concerned about making sure I rinsed off any residue from the chlorinated pool water though, then give everything a nice quick drying with a heat gun.
SBwingman 1 week ago
*****LOSING*****
AvocadoAtrocity 1 week ago
isnt the glock designed to fire underwater???????????????
idapunch 1 week ago
@idapunch
>any gun
>designed to fire underwater
HAHAHAHA no
tostedcheeseman 1 week ago
It's like shooting into water as well. It's the same thing. If a person is underwater and the shooter is above water all u need to do is atleast get 2-3ft underwater And your safe.
MrArjay123 1 week ago
We all live in a yellow submarine!!! Ahh I love The Beatles!
Astromaster90 1 week ago
Nice vid
littleman45able 1 week ago
@deuceheavyweaponzloc lmao!
BosoxSellout1918 1 week ago
Why is everyone bitching about the shooter going deaf he is wearing underwater ear plugs and with those things you can hear the blood running through your veins.
GuildCarver 1 week ago
If the tick from a miniscule watch escapement can easily be heard at a distance underwater, shouldn't the explosive force of anything that goes BOOM shatter his face or something?
Ps35176 1 week ago
@Ps35176 Sound travels through solids and liquids easier than air because of the distance between individual atoms/molecules. So in theory you would be right... If the blast was much larger, but the bang we associate with gun is actually just the sound of the gases expanding inside. No shockwave of substantial power is produced by any handgun or rifle for that matter. I'm sure as you got up into the cannons and such it would be a different story though.
MolecularGraph 1 week ago
Shockwaves travel through liquid far more efficiently than they do through gas (a ticking watch can be heard 30 feet away whilst submerged), so why does this not rupture his eardrums?
Ps35176 1 week ago
@Ps35176 maybe he is deaf lol
JonDemo 1 week ago
Hate le beatles. This is not rock.
HackerAndBootSniffer 1 week ago
115 OMG
ryanchapinable 1 week ago
why dont those silly army scientists put water pockets in the vests??? problem?
ROLNIKxPL 2 weeks ago
@ROLNIKxPL when they are hit the water will leak
devinwalker47 2 weeks ago
RRRREEEDDNNEECCKKSS!!!!
koikid999 2 weeks ago
i used to fire weapons underwater too but then i took a shark tooth to the knee
deuceheavyweaponzloc 2 weeks ago
and the music award goes to......
MegaJackattack123 2 weeks ago
wouldnt the sound kill your ears under water?
vf12497439 2 weeks ago
@vf12497439 No because the "gas" of the round being propelled is louder in thin air than it would be underwater. Because water contains less air. The sound of the gas escaping would be in a bubble thus acting like a suppressor. I'd be more worried about the concussion of the round.
UrbanLeopard13 2 weeks ago
@UrbanLeopard13 that was a strange explanation.... you got so scientific i had to google it. lets put it this way, you can hear your joints clicking as you swim underwater in a swimming pool? lets set off a M-80 while your in that pool. kills fish
vf12497439 2 weeks ago
@vf12497439 there are dynamics involved here i dont understand, I do know that a 12 gauge shot gun shell with canon fuse is suffitient to go fishing with, salmon fishing!
vf12497439 2 weeks ago
rip bill hicks
armytaskforce11x 2 weeks ago
yellow submarine
BlueZooon 2 weeks ago
Lol nice vid, I like your target setup!!!
daddy1527 2 weeks ago
Good music choice. :)
Socksisme1 2 weeks ago
ARRRRGGGHH!!!! LOSING!!! LOSE!!! LOSING!!! NOT FREAKING "LOOSING!!"
I blame public schools. America is doomed.
That said, "2 inch group" was hilarious.
ceounicom 2 weeks ago
@ceounicom Well, I suppose it was a two inch grouping there. lol Now we just need to figure out the underwater MOA.. lol
Nosfurato2 2 weeks ago
I wonder if theres enough velocity to kill some one at point blank range under water. They should it with ballistic gel
pkfrisko29 2 weeks ago
@pkfrisko29 Yes. There would be enough force between the barrel of the glock and about 18 inches of water, anything past about 18 inches would only bruise someone if the bullet wouldn't spin out of control first.
UrbanLeopard13 2 weeks ago
Hey, at least it's still a 2 inch group!
koroshbaradaran 2 weeks ago
Polish torpedoes
coolruehle 2 weeks ago
This is how Chuck Norris goes fishing.
obbis44 2 weeks ago
@obbis44 he does it with a nuclear bomb though
skiddalek 2 weeks ago
Chu got some balls, thanks bud. Bless you.
XGCScrappy 2 weeks ago
me
chichito1998 2 weeks ago
yellow submarine.
TheDestructocon 3 weeks ago
dude this is so cool
zachn11 3 weeks ago
Rahj an MP5 generally is chambered in 9mm.... Also the ballistics of a 9 mm far exceed those of a .45. I'm sure any firearms instructor or someone on the range for a minute would also know that. Just some words.
tonecrazy88 3 weeks ago
Sweet. It's like Half Life.
NehemiahDC 3 weeks ago
Has anyone tried this with a Glock 22 or 23 or 27 if so how far does the bullet stop =D
404040c 3 weeks ago
Thats hilarious...I'm guess because its an auto is why it didnt rupture the barrel?
FPVUAV 3 weeks ago
@FPVUAV it really normally shoot since its only a 9mm, try that with a 45 or any high powered firearm like an mp5 etc. that guy will be ruptured itself.
rahj8786 3 weeks ago
@rahj8786 Douche! You obviously know nothing about guns.
nccrawford 3 weeks ago
still a two inch grouping, that was funny:)
ptm5150 3 weeks ago
wow just 2 feet..need to bring something bigger down there,,maybe you could empty the pool...lol
killancid 3 weeks ago
Only reason i watched it all was because of the song. Beatles FTW
Taxman58 3 weeks ago 25
@Taxman58 Tu eres un comemierda lol
TheLafranyie 2 weeks ago
@Taxman58 Obviously thats a lit because you didn't know there was a Beatles song in this video. And the Beatles are over rated!
AdoreYouInAshXI 2 weeks ago
@Taxman58 Beatles FTL.
TaePoDongIII 6 days ago
do you think the bullet could deliver a leathal hit within the two feet before losing all velocity??
TomCat686 3 weeks ago
that target looks like space ghost
billyhay 3 weeks ago 6
@billyhay it does!!!!!!!!
cygnus3386 2 weeks ago
I said near... All it would take is a bullet and his back would be gone... Js
rsrip12006 3 weeks ago
Guns or evil....but in call of duty mw3 it's not lol
xXMWskillzXx 3 weeks ago
hey lets shoot stuff near a compressed air tank... lol just saying :p
rsrip12006 3 weeks ago
@rsrip12006 Near, not at...
krazed0451 3 weeks ago
This is great... I always felt so defenceless when going for my daily underwater jogs
AndrosForever 3 weeks ago
REALLY?! I HAD NO IDEA WATER =/= AIR!!!
MrJonJuda 3 weeks ago
you need to crouch for better accuracy
funkyseefunkydo 3 weeks ago
Most guns do this and the bullet goes no where for like 1-2 feet. People should NOT perpetuate a myth that the bullets go further underwater as if Glock has a magic touch. Some pistols will NOT shoot underwater because of defects in firing mechanism, but for those that will fire it does NOT mean the bullets have some great efficacy when discharged underwater.
patriotofliberty1776 3 weeks ago
Glocks fire any where lol.
HomeMadeGunNut 3 weeks ago
We all live in a yellow submarine, yellow submarine, yellow submarine...................
Ekriptonite 3 weeks ago
i like turtles
ipodkorean 3 weeks ago
next do it with a tazer
OGKILLa9365 3 weeks ago 205
@OGKILLa9365 hahahaha ;D
mytravelbag 3 weeks ago
@OGKILLa9365 That's some funny shit...I don't think anyone else got it.
owasso93 3 weeks ago
@OGKILLa9365 everyone in the water would die though????
GaNgStAr646 2 weeks ago
haha u could return them with a baseball bat :P lolol
GStreetEntertainment 4 weeks ago
Ya on mythbusters they did how far a bullet could teacup under water, every thing, even a 50 cal, could only go 3 ft before becoming shratnel
fuzzyman146 4 weeks ago
like a pea shooter lol
Scyeth 4 weeks ago
007!!!
TheSpartanfan01 4 weeks ago
First round fired you can see it fall down right after it comes out of the barrel....sweet video
rwashamknife 4 weeks ago
I wad hoing to say simething but I can't spell it right do fuck it
Thedevontree 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice , Check out my channel, i shoot GUNS and EXPLOSIVES
TheDangerZone999 4 weeks ago
Don't try this with a flintlock,it won't work.
blastforyou 4 weeks ago 3
have someone stand 3 feet away and film it coming at them!
uztoobz 1 month ago
general shepherd: they are on a covert mission behind enemy lines
allen: are their feet wet
shepherd: lets just say they're soaked
MegaBLARP 1 month ago
Damn now that song is stuck in my head.
Sternzy7425 1 month ago
I was always wondering whether the barrel would explode as the bullet leaving it's casing would have to displace the water in the barrel at about a 1000 fps... Have you tried it with another blowback firearm like a .45 ACP? How was the carbon buildup in the barrel? Were also the brass deformed? Was also surprised that the firearm actually cycled, given that the ejected shell would be slowed down by the surrounding water... Perhaps, the escaping gases created an air-pocket, allowing the she
kmantzouranis 1 month ago
nothing like a little lead in the swimming pool!
DevLcL 1 month ago
The Russians developed a firearm specifically for underwater work. The bullets look more like nails than traditional bullets but the range was still under twenty meters if memory serves.
rogerpemberton 1 month ago
Wasn't sure it'd fire... expected it to come up short.
The "still a 2 inch group" - nice. LOL. :D
thirteenfingers 1 month ago
lol @ the grouping ref
mexoplex 1 month ago
Yelloew Submarine+ the first few seconds of the d day invasion from saving private ryan.Someone needs to do this!
icanmyshoetie 1 month ago
another really smart guy..Laughinggggggggggg
WRockW10 1 month ago
whos watching the worst nipple piercing reaction ever next!
jakeballin13 1 month ago 332
@jakeballin13 lol, me!
sal70228 1 month ago
@jakeballin13 Bah watched it 591 times. Ahh fuck it maybe ill see tits this time
wargarkaz 3 weeks ago
@jakeballin13 lmao man that video is appearing for next suggestion for almost every gun video i watch!
TomCat686 3 weeks ago
@jakeballin13 ahahahahhahahahahahah
metalfan4dime 2 weeks ago
@jakeballin13 just did
funnyhispanic 2 weeks ago
Myth busters did an episode on this that explains this much better.
KatoKid85 1 month ago
Moral of the story: If your going to shoot someone under water make sure the barrel is up against(or within a few inches of) them before you pull the trigger!
ScenePhotos 1 month ago
i was worried that he or she would get showered with lead because i thought the bullet might explode right out side of the gun
Aceelephant4 1 month ago
Yellow Submarine ^-^
pksupersweet1 1 month ago
i love the effects in the start and end of the video
ArmyRescue2 1 month ago
I liked the part where they said "yellow submarine"
rbryanhull 1 month ago
mythbusters 2.0 lol
socomsnipa904 1 month ago
WE LIVE IN A BROWN SUBMARINE!
evansmeven 1 month ago
I live in a yellow submarine.
vtogvblog 1 month ago
Black mesa security forces have WAY better glocks!
deadguy718 1 month ago
i was so siked to wath it then the song t is awsome
sk088terkid 1 month ago
The great thing about this is that lure savvy fish are so not expecting it.
thecuddlemoose 1 month ago
the results from shooting into water is different from shooting in water right?
startingsprinter 1 month ago
@startingsprinter yes there is a difference. When he shot it underwater, the bullet had to travel through the water. The water represents resisitance. Now imagine standing on a boat shooting down into the water. The bullet travels through the air, building up momentum before penetrating the water. Heavy resistance is only encountered when the bullet enters the water, thus slowing it down.
TheCookiemonster1822 1 month ago
@TheCookiemonster1822 The bullet doesn't build up momentum while travelling through the air. It's moving faster than terminal velocity, which means drag decelerates it more than gravitation can accelerate it even if it's going straight down.
Sakkura1 1 month ago
@TheCookiemonster1822 The bullet is at maximum speed when it leaves the barrel.
It does not build up momentum while traveling through the air -- momentum only ever decreases.
bobbytimberlake 1 month ago
@startingsprinter They did these test also with mythbusters and shooting into water doesn't do well either because the bullet hits the water mass and stops just as fast.
So probably also a Hollywood myth when you see guys getting shot under water from bad guys shooting from a boat :P
AgentBO 1 month ago
@AgentBO Actually no, because the bullet gains significant velocity before it hits the water. Think of it this way, do you hit the bottom of the pool faster when you jump off of a 9 foot waterfall that's above water or one you jump off of that's below water?
BabsControl 1 month ago
@AgentBO so is saving private ryan realistic?
startingsprinter 1 month ago
@startingsprinter these bullets started out under water making them slower. a gun shot in normal conditions will go alot faster and will be able to go through water like in the movie.
JOSH3SiX 1 month ago
That's why you should jump into water when getting shot at.
adrianroam95 1 month ago