Admiral Kuznetsov Russian aircraft carrier

[WTFMazafaka]

у нас всего в РФ один ядерный авианосец, у Америки их уже 10 и 2 строиться, и водоизмещение у них по 100 т. А у этого всего 60 т., обидно блин..

[grozd102]

Я виж- една американска мисъл блуждае на луната- ? Дали да не пратиме некоя совалка да я върне?

[grozd102]

Повече от очакваното еБратската позивна - ПРОСТО ВЪРХЪ!

[grozd102]

Не разбрах къде ви е базата, и как мога да доплуВАМ

[Mykola40]

rus-military . livejournal . com / 66036 . html

[grozd102]

Ако не слушат , ще им пленя я каквото си МИСЛЪТ и са обречени , не РУСНАЦИТЕ , който посмее

[grozd102]

Буш става за лейтенант стига да не го стигне находката за БЪДЕЩЕТО

[TheAzero19]

SUPER!!!

[zoran3119]

AMERICA 2000 THE END HAHAHAHA

[KypHeM]

This ship has no defense its no match to any modern nuclear air carrier.

[MrRishi1973]

@KypHeM with TU-22M backfire bombers not even the most modern carrier battlegroups can survive.

[fabriciobrisola1]

Russia South America! united always unbeatable!

[Mykola40]

@fabriciobrisola1 "South America" isn't "America". USA is AMERICA! And South America is just a territory of corruption. In the same way as Russia.

[fabriciobrisola1]

@Mykola40 Yeah the name that the North and South America is to have a location and not to make calculation of polical corruption!

[Talshet]

@Mykola40 The most corrupted country is USA.Killed own people to bring reason up to invade iraq and afghanistan, like in WW1 and Vietnam.Like 1996 and 1992.You are the biggest threat and most corrupted country on earth. Terrorist America.

[Mykola40]

@Talshet Must remember that Russia had a war in Afghanistan in 1979-1989, and killed nearly 2 million people. That Russia killed in Chechnya more people than the U.S. atomic bomb in Hiroshima WWII. What the U.S.did not fight in Iraq, Libya, Serbia. There was fighting coalition NATO members.

[val28l]

@Mykola40 wow, you're an idiot. mind telling me where you get your so called "facts" from?

[Mykola40]

@val28l Fuck you moron.

[val28l]

@Mykola40 ooh, so THAT is your argument? lol. what are you, from western ukrain? (or what ever that country's name)

[Direx230]

@Mykola40 wow you're ignorant as fuck.

[Mykola40]

@Direx230 So what?

[Direx230]

@Mykola40 What so?

[Boggoranthius]

Russians have really great composers (Tchaikovsky, Glinka, Mussorgsky, Borodin, Rimsky-Korsakov, Prokofiev, Shostakovitch, etc.) why do they have to use such arsewipe " music" whenever they display their (excellent) military hardware.

[ANTIfreeman]

The best aircraft carrier

[wimpog97]

Почитайте про этот корабль:

legion . wplus . net / typhoon / 1999 / kuz . shtml

rus-military . livejournal . com / 66036 . html

Это даже хуже чем я себе представлял!!!

[Mykola40]

@wimpog97 +100

[grozd102]

@wimpog97 Целия въпрос е : Да се помогне , може и чрез американски самолетоносачи за скраб или молитвите на РУСКИЯ НАРОД или бракувани небъдещта , за НОВЪЕ. Сеега , твое конституциионно невежество и други онлаин небудеща!

[galeo88]

Отличный авианосец!

[lonewolfgabo]

The fact that Su-33's don't relay on catapult asisted take off from deck, from my point of view, gives a good advantage because of the less time / crew efford needed to launch and recover aircrafts. Plus the su-33 is probably the best carrier based multi-roll figther in the world. Even today. Althou the f-18 Supper Hornet is very good too.

[wimpog97]

@lonewolfgabo On the other hand, the fighters always take off underarmed and underfueled, which means they're less effective in combat, and have shorter range/flight time. The ramp can't lift heavy jets. In full armament, and with full fuel tanks those jets would not be able to take off from from this ship.

[texaca]

@wimpog97 If they takeoff, with out a full load of fuel, then where do they get refueled. Is there a tanker in the air. If so, where does the tanker come from, its not launched off of the same flight deck, they don't have catapults on the side ramp... do they?

[wimpog97]

@texaca I don't think there is a tanker that refuels them in the air. Even if there is one, it has to take off from the ground as this ramp will not lift it. This particular ship has no catapults, so its fighters have to come back to the ship to refuel.

[CVAN687478]

Russians are pussies whom could not afford these and had to sell them to the Chinks.........

[Bugel852]

September 5, 2010 died legendary pilot - Hero of Russia Sergey Melnikov. He was a pilot who had taught take off and land on the deck of aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov "Su-33.Pervym in Russia carried out 100 and 200 landings on the deck of an aircraft carrier. The experience gained from the tests, further allowed him to develop a methodology and to train front-line pilots the ship's 279 Fighter Regiment technique of landing on an aircraft carrier deck. He was only 51 years.

[leonelp51]

@Bugel852 fuck ... R.I.P .

[rmnbrw]

wrong, kuznetzov was not sold to india, it was other much older carrier called goroshkow.

[TheCharlie359]

@rmnbrw, Correction, Indian aircraftcarrier Vikramitdya (former Gorshkov) joined the Soviet fleet in 1987, Kuznetsov in 91 so its not a "much older ship" atall.

[iliafish]

Not really Russian any more. Sold to India...

[leonelp51]

@iliafish no, russia sold the admiral goroshkow, is in modification phase right now.

[bittemeinrammstein]

@iliafish - wow.... facepalm

[MsGuano]

@iliafish индии продали другой авианосец. Меньшего размера . (use translator)

[iliafish]

Sold to India...

[Spetsnazovets]

Nice video. Love the fact that its armed with Kortik system and anti-missiles as well as offensive missiles like Granit. This ship is certainly more then just a floating airfield. Its name it true. Heavy Aircraft-carrying Cruiser.

[641Dragon]

@Dogapsa yes.

[4flagman]

 Слава сильной России !!!

[Positivectrl]

@RaptorGP

даааа гатлинги шикарные шопесдетс ^_^

ваще скорострельные пулимьоты больная тема ;)

тут исчо есть видео называеццо "Петя долбит!"- набери если не видел =)

[Positivectrl]

RUSSIA FOREVER!

This is not just a carrier but a kinda battlestation

[VictorLeontiev]

Кто-бы сомневался , что Русские воины и техника лучшие в мире!

[Boggoranthius]

Would it be too much if one were to ask for a video without any crap disco music?

[MsAllegator]

на 01:48 там чё с лева зилок стоит

[TareLekha002]

@MsAllegator Нет нет ! с права ! угу гу гу !

[MsAllegator]

@TareLekha002 ты чё где я там и ты

[bestamerica]

i like american aircraft carriers and ships than ussr russia

[RaptorGP]

Especially I like antiaircraft guns / Особенно нравятся шестиствольные пушки. А звук-то какой!...

[lordofbore]

interesting vid thanks for posting

[Kamikadze72]

Просто класс, если бы ещё соответствующее снаряжение обслуживающему персоналу про прообразу американцев...(защитные шлёмы с наушниками, цвета разных служб и т.д. и т.п.)

[BorshCaen]

@Kamikadze72 Американцы позеры от природы. Это во всем, в кладбищах, в оформлении общественных мест, в армии. Ну, хоть бы фото дорог. Ходил я по улицам в Лонг Бич. Трещины на асфальте, выебаны даже есть. А на фотках всё так красиво.

[piwoda1968]

ruskie maszyny sa ok widzialem nie raz na pokazach to jest power

[peschernik]

For example: Ticonderoga (US missile cruiser) has only 122 rockets.

Ticonderoga use anti-ship rockets RGM-84 Harpoon:

speed0,85 (864 km/h)

operational range150 km.

Admiral Kuznetsov use anti-ship rockets Granit

Speed 2,5 (2541 km/h)

Operational range600 km

[peschernik]

Admiral Kuznetsov is not carrier. That's an aircraft-cruiser with nuclear weapons and more than 500 rockets. (Alsow Admiral Kuznetsov has 15 × Su-33, 5 × Su-25UTG/UBP and 24 × helicopters.) But a brainless american aren't able to understand the difference.

[oneclowndown]

Yeah because the brainless Americans would rather deliver nuclear weapons from 90 aircraft versus one big floating target like the Russians.  Great post!

[BorshCaen]

@oneclowndown Actually it's not a big deal to wreck up the defence of US carriers. It had been done by Russians, Australians and I just don't know by whom else. The american carriers are pretty protectless. At least USA has not an armada of carriers.

[641Dragon]

@BorshCaen Actually your wrong. Im a United States Special Forces Marine. Been doing special forces for years. Ive been on many aircraft carriers since I enlisted and became a commander. They are deffended by a fleet of ships at all times. Its not easy to take out an aircraft carrier let alone a fleet. Plus once lauched the F-14 Tomcat would go out and give the navy enough time to get reinforcements. Probably the F-22 Raptor or the F-35 Lightning. Both designed for dog fights and bombing.

[BorshCaen]

@641Dragon You didn't say anything new. Of course it's clear. But you can't refute a fact that Russians and Australians were penetrating the US aircraft carriers' defence. It's mean a carrier will be likely sunk coz nowadays weapon systems are capable to make critical damages for a carrier.

[641Dragon]

@BorshCaen A sub could take out a carrier already. But the point still is that this carrier cant take out the fleet protecting the aircraft carriers. Rarely are they unprotected. One carrier of this type can do some damage, dont get me wrong, but not enough to sink a fleet. Not to mention that the U.S. has their own forms of defense stations like this. Carriers in the U.S. Navy are by all means capable of defending themselves

[zvast]

@641Dragon Not only they have great protection but they are hard to sink. I saw a documentary of a old one being sunk and it took a lot of preparation to make many holes in many compartments. Small nuke torpedo would have to do it.

See video about sinking Oriskany.

I don't know how well built is Kuznetsov. It's not nuclear powered, so it has a lot of fuel on board.

[641Dragon]

@zvast This is true. All depends on the layout of the ship though. Some were built with extra rooms so that it would be harder.

[BorshCaen]

@641Dragon No, it's you got me wrong. I didn't mean "Kuznecov" is cpable to sink a fleet by itself firepower. Actually I was speaking of defence penetration. But if you have stuck to carriers then I may tell "Kuznecov" is an asskicker compare to "Nimitz" class. 12th "Granit" missiles launchers make the ship is a dangerous rival in seafight. Of course it's kinda Spiderman vs Superman talk.

[641Dragon]

@BorshCaen You miss understand my point. IF it came to war between the U.S. and Russia, this ship alone would not be able to defend itself against the fleet that would be sent. As for the "Nimitz" class, I have been on one and know what they are capable of, the planes capable of being on the "Nimitz" class carrier would out fly the Su-33 or any other plane on the carrier in a heart beat. Ever seen the movie Top Gun? Its not just a movie. Its based upon the real fighter program here.

[BorshCaen]

@641Dragon Did I say "Kuznecov" is able to defend itself in front of a fleet? Quote me. "Nimitz" class is just a huge airfield. He is strenghtless against 12th "Granites". I don't know if even a group of ships will be strenghtless as well. Just face it - "Nimitz" hasn't any strike weapon. And his defensive weapon's system doesn't give any warranty that the carrier won't get a couple of Granites right in the board.

[641Dragon]

@BorshCaen But you seem to think that they sail alone. They never do. I understand that the ship itself isnt that great. But when its protected by the fleet as always, good luck getting your missles to it.

[BorshCaen]

@641Dragon You see? You said it "the ship isn't that great" then why did you argue? I told the same but you have started to argue about it.

[641Dragon]

@BorshCaen Because its also not as defensless as you think it is. One on one, yes it likely would go down. But its never one on one and thats why its a mobile air field

[BorshCaen]

@641Dragon Okey-okey you repeat yourself twise and as a fact admitting to my rightness. It's time to change topic. Isn't it?

[641Dragon]

@BorshCaen Heres my point, They made it a mobile air field and not much else because thats what they needed. They dont need a defense station like this carrier because we have all we need in that manor

[BorshCaen]

@641Dragon U are stubborn. Aren't you? Well, if you wish to stick at the carriers then alright. What a defense station are u talking about?

[641Dragon]

@BorshCaen The Kuznetsov is a sort of defense station. But if you would like to switch tpics, what topic?

[BorshCaen]

@641Dragon Any topic. Coz we are starting to go by circle with the carries one. We may just babble in private messages about anything.

[641Dragon]

@oneclowndown Wrong. We have bases and single aircraft capable of stealth bombing. We also have tatical nukes on subs and boats.

[Steelheart8280]

It's good to see that the Russian's now are not anymore... so secretive about their military hardware...

[TheTourlous]

great vid , great ship. Spaciba.

[ganarzon]

this carrier looks so poor...

[augusto352]

how many Admiral Kuznetsov's russia have

?

[TheCharlie359]

ONE!

[augusto352]

russia dont need more ..  russian military power is disuasive... not imperialist... (USA)

[TheCharlie359]

Simply anwsering your question but to be able to effectivly feild carrier based airpower you ideally need at least 3 carriers, 1 at sea, 1 in training or reserve and 1 in refit.

[bestamerica]

augusto,

yes that is right,,,

ussr russia have too much waste arms weapons for nothing

[mortal4pf]

Admiral Kuznecov his name aircraft carrier

[Arnee01901]

one...

[641Dragon]

@augusto352 1 at the moment.

[rhctam]

Great! It feels like you are on board yourself. Don't know the Russian Navy is so opened nowadays. Thanks for posting. Спасибо!

[BISUMARKCL4496M]

I love this fighter!!

[Suyamu]

there is a need for military - not just a perceived one.

[DeLaVeGaGr]

Holly shit is this Su-27???

I could kill to fly with this aircraft!!!!

[Suyamu]

They're Su-33 - carrier versions of Su-27.

You can recognize them by canards, short tailcone and hook.

[CVAN687478]

Russian Carriers are junk and their navy is full of faggots..........

[FOESANGUINAREO]

The BEST aircraft carrier in the WORLD.

PERU AND RUSSIA TOGETHER FOREVER!

[Lumotaku]

Peru has a tugboat to play carrier with this one?

[zvast]

@FOESANGUINAREO The best aicraft carrier?

Best joke I heard in a long time!

[KiintoisiatVideota]

@FOESANGUINAREO where is peru?

[mezrock]

клас спасибо.

[Iosis07]

THX for the video, nice carrier.

[ichbinsdoch]

The aircraft carrier with the best selfdefensive system. Stay away him. Is better! :)

Great video.

[pilotossss]

very cool video ....su"s dont need catapult to taxi from carrier

[InfiniteMushroom]

Russia has got to stop using the Kuznetsov as a hobby of the state and start using it as an instrument of foreign policy and power projection. Most critics don't understand the carrier's true role. The carrier is used against armies, civilian insurgents, and support of intelligence ops against foreign governments. The American carriers, for example, directly serve the New York-London banking mafia by enforcing their fraudulent decrees and dictates of NWO monsters like Zbigniew Brzezinski.

[shmelushka]

write a letter to Putin, and explain it all to him xDDD

[InfiniteMushroom]

Zbigniew Brzezinski = bad.

I'll come by Putin's office to collect my consultant fee!

[NUSRPKINA]

Super power Russian army go brothers God bless you all.

[mikkitiny]

nice video. thanks, jeka!

[jaggalclammeat]

зачот! одобряю!))))

[305690364]

They don't use them cuz Russian fighters don't need it, & belive me, Russians can do everything if they need.

[cejkis]

The reason why Russian carrier don't use steam catapult is that no one russian factory havn't be able to do it..

[Cheburdac]

Well if plane is able to take of without "steam catapult", it seems russians have pretty good aircrafts, so why do they need thous catapults.

But none russian carrier is better than Nimitz class aircraft carriers...IMHO

[zvast]

Well, it's like this:

Without catapults, Admiral Kuznetsov cannot launch strike aircraft with heavy loads.

So with only one ramp and light load, what is it good for?

Just few dog fights?

[ichbinsdoch]

Every plane who launched from carriers will refueled by tanker in the air. You will never see a fully laden aircraft who launch from a carrier.

Catapults must be always calibrated......etc.

Sorry because of my english.:)

[641Dragon]

@zvast it was built as a defensive station

[zvast]

@641Dragon Defensive? And they only managed to build one in 60-70 years?

[641Dragon]

@zvast Its meant as a carrier to be capable of defending itself against enemy boats and aircraft. In offense its got its merits, but an enemy fleet would take it out quickly. It was started as a test. Now that they have one that is fully operational they will be building more.

[zvast]

@641Dragon Due to the size of Russia, they better build something like 100.

But who is threatening Russia? Big powers may use ICMB's. USA doesn't atack big nations. Maybe Mongolia or Georgia?

[641Dragon]

@zvast They want to start build mass amounts against the Middle East. Or atleast thats what they say. There has been some wonder as to weither they will then turn to former Soviet Union states. The carrier is also capable of shooting down ICBM's. Whatever the purpose is, they are trying to show that thier military might has not been completely lost after WW2.

[zvast]

@641Dragon WW2 was over 65 years ago. They are kind of behind.

[641Dragon]

@zvast Yes. All of the powers that were fighting are still struggling to have the most power. Its the national pride and braging rights.

[zvast]

@641Dragon But Kuznetsov is already 25 years old and other were either sold to China or canceled.

For defense, as you mentioned, maybe the helicopter carriers are better.

But they are also old.

[641Dragon]

@zvast While it is old, they are still trying to make it more efficient. We dont know if they were sold to china but it is possible. The cost was out wieghing weither it was worth it or not. I personally think they are still testing it.

[641Dragon]

@Cheburdac the catapults are for bigger strike planes. the su-33 shown is a light fighter

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"is that no one russian factory havn't be able to do it.."

BULLSHIT

It's because Soviet aircraft had another purpose (air defence with some attack capabilities)

[raymondwong01]

electric music very good

[WMuckaMW]

and Su-33 and Su-25 and Ka-27 very very good )

[raymondwong01]

FIRE POWER

[bittemeinrammstein]

the music is absolutly beautiful! Russia forward!!!

[eugensn]

красавец!

[theredraven]

Except SU-33's can't use them because Kuznetsov doesn't have catapults to launch them fully loaded.

[zrvpvo8789]

You need catapults to launch fully loaded bombers.

Kuznetsov purpose - Fleet Air Defence....

[Crashman2]

Superb in every way. 5 big red stars!

[loki4145]

вери куль!!!

жаль, что мало штук

[alves10jo]

Я служил на Кузе . Дивизион движения 1 МКГ 2

[AMIGABLUEBIRD]

die kuznetsov ist doch eigentlich mehr oder weniger ein traeger zur erprobung , soweit ich weiss sind deren nachfolger nochmal ne ecke besser ...

aber ich finde der traeger ist jetzt schon super ... :)

dazu muss man auch sagen das ist nen anderes konzept , als bei den amerikanern .

die kuznetsov hat ihre flugzeuge nur als schutz , der traeger kann ziele mit lenkwadden selbst angreifen .

auch die defensiv waffen sind um laengen besser als bei den us traegern !

einfach super teil :)

[bluehound35]

I declare this carrier.......awesome!!!!

[Astra253]

Божественная красота!

[wolfmanalpha]

like I said in a few other videos I am tired of U.S. propaganda

[bluezzzzzz]

Совершенно замечательно!!

А откуда видео?

По всей видимости, снято кем-то из команды. Оттого и ценно!

Спасибо!!!!

[stealthf14d]

all i can sya is they'd better not sell it to the ChiComs...

[21StCenturyWarfare]

The fastest carrier in the world!

[ComradeLynx]

10 Thumbsup's, congrats :)

[bittemeinrammstein]

best military in the world! RUSSIA!

[redrocker72]

rossija vpered

[oscarbooo]

Awsome video 5*!

[suska122]

Семь футов под килем тебе, Кузя

[shagohood7]

Super !!!!

[flanker47]

Admiral Kuznetsov is really great!

Su-33 is the best naval fighter in the world.

I saw an Su-39 in the carrier to.

Thanks man!!! =)

[tomekst44]

Lol... I dont look at title xD Sorry. Nice Vid!

[tomekst44]

Is this carrier?

[ComradeLynx]

Also, the defencive/offencive firepower this carries equals about 4 med. battle ships

[drdre312]

супер зачет

[FAA101]

Muy bueno, interesante !.

[ComradeLynx]

The guy at 03:29 looks like Putin...!

:D

[marshalbuff]

Yes haha

[sancer88]

the best plane

[Rubinho7231]

MAX ***** 5*!!!! ;)

[Danda1999]

Bravo!!! 5 stars well deserved!!!

[DSkalashnikov]

great video

[darkmastr1]

excellent!

[vladru21]

this carrier bears my name!