Totally unrealistic and lacking the minimum facts of science. Nature is not perfect. Tsunamis, earthquakes, volcanoes, hurricanes and tornadoes just bring destruction and death. Some animals exists just to live off other species, virus and parasites among them. There are still no known causes for some birth defects in humans. Seems that the intelligent designer didnt made a perfect creation.
@Quixotepr Can YOU make it better? Why don't you try? Everything happen for the reason...if you don't see it you are missing big picture. But I respect your view. If only more people would free to question evolutionists and make them look for an answer...maybe this world would be better place
planets and solar systems have nothing to do with evolution, so I dont care if you used to believe it, you obviously had no idea what it was. OMG, the animals didnt come BEFORE the earth. The earth came first and THEN the animals evolved. Yes, this planet is suitable for life, so what? That doesnt tell you that it is designed at all .THere are billions and billions on planets out there, its pure statistic chance. You didnt present ANYTHING that contradicts evolution, LOL.
''I'm a Marine, not a soldier. None of that gear was made with evolution science either.''
Afraid your wrong there, Sporty, the latest generation tech is computer modelled though 10,000s of generations of evolution equations to optimise performance.
Why do you think business/commerce agrees with evolution and the science which surrounds it? Because it makes a shit load of money... because it is true.
Wake up FFS, you're a gun-totin' GI. You have zero knowledge of this subject.
evolution is just plain stupid. To get to biological evolution, we first have to cross cosmic evolution, then chemical evolution, then stellar evolution, then planetary evolution to finally, Organic evolution. LOL..
The very first one is ludicrous.. and to continue to postulate the rest requires a willing disbelief in facts of basic physics or at least a stretch of those laws beyond logic and the laws itself.
Believing in evolution isn't just blind faith, you are presented with evidence (of which there is an astonishing amount) and make a logical decision about it. How people can jam their fingers in their ears and deny evolution amazes me
@USERNAMEfieldempty Then why did you watch? And please explain horseshit. I am open minded. Used to believe in evolution too. Untill I started using brain.
0.32 - 0.40 "Every system operates in accordance with specific laws." ie Scientific laws.
Then
0.38 - 0.44 ''There is a plan, a design and a balance in every part of the univesrse"
which is unproved religious doctrine.
You can't use science to support your God and then ignore the science you don't like. Science told you about the universe, Science told you about evolution. Science does NOT show that life was designed, it shows it evolved. It is a fact.
@Sehara This vid doesnt disprove evolution at all, it doesnt even have anything to do with evolution. Explain to me what evolution has to do with planets or how life came to be?=) Ill give ya a proof of evolution, human cromosome 2. Now give me a prof that evolution does not occur, I truly doubt that you will ever find it because you do not have the understanding. The fact that you do not seem to know what a theory is proves your lack of knowledge.
@TheHumanbeingHuman You fill in the gap with religion, fair enough, this takes faith in something that can not be proven. I respect your right to believe in what yo want to believe.
@TheHumanbeingHuman Also you will notice that I said that the human race has advanced because of he scientific method, wether these people believed in god or not, you can be sure that their experiments were scientific,not based on faith.
@TheHumanbeingHuman I will not reply to you anymore. Your mind is literally stuck in the middle ages, you are completely blinded by your faith. The last thing i will say is, the differance between me and you is that if you came to me with real evidence for god, I would listen and accept the proof which was shown to me. You on the other hand can have mountains of evidence put before you yet never accept any of it.
@TheHumanbeingHuman You need to look into what the scientific method is all about. And look at peer reviewed material. The advancements in the mordern world have been achieved by humans adopting a scientific approach.
@TheHumanbeingHuman This is a long, long debate.I will say though that I came to the conclusion that god is nonsense through my own research. This did mean reading alot of books by as you call it "seems smart" people. This is where your arrogance comes in, you say people that seem smart. Why is is that books written by people using an accumilation of knowledge before them hold less credance with you then ancient texts that are constantly proven false ?
one thing i would like to ask evolutionists is --- If micro-organisms grew to become fish then amphibians then lizards then dinosaurs and then a meteor hit causing a cloud of dust to cover the earth for more than a year completely wiping out all forms of live, then how did birds and miceout live the dinos when all of the food and water was supposedly toxic for longer than anything could possibly survive without them?
@Japheth19 It didn't wipe out all of the life on earth. The smaller animals survived. The most up to date theory is that the meteor caused massive fires and clouds of dust (like sandstorms) that caused larger animals that lived on land to starve, suffocate, and burn. Smaller burrowing animals (like early mammals), as well as, animals that could survive for extended periods of time (or permanently) underwater (like crocodiles or sharks) survived because they could escape from these things. (pt1)
@Japheth19 How would a meteor make food and water toxic? It would create dirt and mud in the water (you know like water in nature). The water was heated incredibly quickly on the top layer and would and down lower it was cooler. Yes it would have ash and other such things, but it was vaporized and became rain which would filter a fair amount of it. Yes the population was educed drastically, but it was not total extinction. Animals will do anything to survive and some of them succeeded.
Why do religous people want to drag us back hundreds of years. You are sitting here using technology provided to you by modern science to promote false outdated ideas.
@thegarbeen why do you ateists think you are more advanced it is a mistery! And to calim that only atesists made technology by "modern" science...Please watch Expelled No Intelligence Allowed and see how many respected scientists are bullied just because they asked question. Is that not dragging back hundreds of years? Thank you
@Sehara I'm not saying that atheists are more advanced. I am saying that the human race is more advanced because of the scientific method, claims made by religion simply do not stand up to the same sort of scrutiny.
@thegarbeen Depends of what calims you are looking. If you are thinking that religious claims are that Earth was made in six millions of years, then you are looking wrong way. There is a religious Book that contains and proves all scientific claims and more and there is no contradiction with science and never changed one letter from the first day. Something to think about: who had a knoledge 1400 years ago that Earth is revolving around a Sun?
@thegarbeen Antiseptic Surgery -Joseph Lister Bacteriology -Louis Pasteur Calculus -Isaac Newton Celestial Mechanics -Johannes Kepler Chemistry -Robert Boyle Comparative -Anatomy Georges Cuvier Dimensional Analysis -Lord Rayleigh Dynamics -Isaac Newton Electronics -John Ambrose Fleming Electrodynamics -James Clerk Maxwell Electromagnetics -Michael Faraday That is just a short list of scientist that belive in God and started Science. You are ill informed.
@conradpilapil They lived in times when religon was still heavily indoctrinated into people from a young age. I suspect that if them same people were alive today their views would be different, look at the vast majority of nobel prize winning scientists today, most of them are atheist.
@thegarbeen Wow.. really? You "suspect".. that is nice. lol.. Well I "suspect" that they would not have changed their minds. Spare me the Noble Prize people.. they have given that to dictators, and people that have achieved nothing. But, if you wish (if you hold the Nobel Prize so dear) I will generate a list of Christians that have also won them..
@thegarbeen Yes.. in Sciences.. just do a google search.. that requires no effort. There are also some scientist in those times that did not believe in God.. Don't be so close minded.. you can find Scientist to fit your belief in that time and now. We have advanced so much in the last 150 years because people allowed the results to say what it is .. not changing it to their preconceived notions.
@conradpilapil hhmmm yes interesting I just took your google advice and it seems that studies in recent years show that in america about 7% of the top scientists believe in god and in the UK about 5%. Thats the top scientists. It seems religious people are the ones who have to cherry pick their experts to fit their beleifs.
@conradpilapil Seriously how can you talk about finding science to "fit your belief" think about your religion and what it actually says. Think about the size of the universe, the amount of time it has been around, think about this earth and what fossil records, carbon dating, dna etc show in terms of an ever changing evolving earth. We are now building up a real picture of what we are and to some extent where we come from, then you turn to me and talk about preconceived notions ?
@thegarbeen The size of the universe just tells me how great my God is. Your fossile records, carbon dating, dna ect doesn't show evolution, it show that NONE of those things support evolution in anyway. In fact, they all mock evolution. We don't need to "build" a picture of who or what we are.. that has been settled.
"Your fossile records, carbon dating, dna ect doesn't show evolution, it show that NONE of those things support evolution in anyway. In fact, they all mock evolution."
You are uneducated in science and do not know anything about these subjects. That has been settled simply by reading your confused post. You do not know what you are talking about. You are scientifically illiterate.
@USERNAMEfieldempty lol.. you seem to think you telling me I'm uneducated makes it true.
1 - Fact, no genetic mutation has ever been recorded where information was added
2 - Fact, carbon dating in not accurate, and live animals have been tested with this and dated in the thousands of years..
3 - Fossiles does not indicate ancestry.. rather death. We have no knowledge that those animals fossilized gave birth to anything, let alone something that it was not. (ie reptiles to birds?)
@USERNAMEfieldempty oh.. I see. Got it. Once you are done with your ad hominem attacks.. let me know. You can start with what I stated last.. the facts. I really could keep that list going.. but it never really ends. Just for kicks..here is one more
Fact - conservation of angular momentum.. by this law.. we should not have planets spinning in the opposite direction... and to top it off.. same goes for several moons.
Would you care to direct me to the world-changing scientific paper which proves basic Newtonian mechanics is completely wrong and that physics has been none-functional since its modern inception??? You have no idea what you're claiming. So I repeat, only a person in possession of a staggering lack of education would try to proudly display brain-turds as stinking as yours.
You, not I, are determined to make you look fucking retarded... So, I guess you must be.
Basic Newtonian Mechanics is just fine.. it just poses serious problems to your "I come from a rock.. or worse, nothing" theory. Do, however, keep the snide comments coming. By most debate standards.. this was over long ago with you getting laughed off the stage. And anytime you want to discuss any of the Facts I'm put out there.. do chime in.
@conradpilapil What 'facts' are you ''putting out there''? I see none.
Pick one 'fact' that you have which is not supported by mainstream science and we'll have a look at it, shall we? Give me one 'Creationist Fact'. I've not seen one yet, only massive sweeping genralisations about why science is stupid and wrong. So, Conrad, enlighten me with one creationist fact that is contrary to science, but still a fact.
Why are you regurgitating lies? The words "science is stupid" NEVER came from me.. I said "EVOLUTION is stupid, not supported by science, not verifiable with the scientific method.. ect.
Fact - Polonium halos - no matter how you cut it.. the earth is not millions, let alone billions of years old. The whole earth was created in seconds per evidence shown.
@conradpilapil - Polonium Haloes - a rebutted and rejected claim that polonium in granite can be used to 'prove' the Earth is young. Gentry's original 'proof' was suppositional and inconclusive, and it is countermanded by hundreds of other verifiable tests and proofs that the Earth is ancient. Polonium Haloes were never a fact, they were a hypothesis that did not hold together. (See TalkOrigins for futher info)
@USERNAMEfieldempty lol.. no it is proof. ALL polonium haloes are "young" compared to evolution. The worst you can do with this is say "no, it took houndreds of years to solidify" which would still destroy evolution.
Attempt One - Game over for you. My sugestion; do your research, and think critically instead of just swallowing what you are given.
Fact 2 - there are no erosion signs in between any of the so called geological column. Surprising since one layer is millions of years old.
@conradpilapil Look, you can't just invent pseudo-facts for your religion. That's called lying. Check the simple scientific literature you'll discover you're completely wrong. It is as simple as that.
This is why both religious people and atheists get very angry with people like you. because you are stubborn to the point of dishonesty.
You are a soldier, aren't you?. But I bet you love all your hi-tech gear, don't you? NONE of that gear was made by creation science. Ask youself why.
@USERNAMEfieldempty .. okay.. get a local "Science" text book out.. and you will find that most of it is correct ..until you get the "evolution" section.. its very simple. Find the "geological column" .. its a nice picture.. does not exist anywhere in the world. Yes there are layers.. but never in the "correct" order that book says.. plus multiple layers with nothing.. these are facts.. get angry.. they lied to you.
Why do the trillion-dollar mining industries and the trillion-dollar oil industry continue to successfully discover deposits based on standard old-earth geology? With that much money at stake, there would be a huge potential for a startling new 'correct' model, if the current old-earth model is wrong. But not one mining or oil company uses the Biblical model to search for deposits. They prefer the success rates provided by the old-earth model.
@USERNAMEfieldempty .. I'm a Marine, not a soldier. None of that gear was made with evolution science either. Thank God.. because it would not stand the test of Marines getting their hands on it.
Lastly, it is common knowledge that evolution - specifically from one species to another - is pseudo science. It has never stood against scruitny. I hate all religions.. including evolution. At the very least, admit that is what you have, a government religion.
@USERNAMEfieldempty Go back to your "evolution" section.. find the picture of the fetus devoloment - proven to be a fruad. Look it up. That whole section is one lie after another. Tell a lie big enough and loud enough.. and it becomes "trueth" (it helps if the government pays for it too). The only problem is when trueth confronts it.. then it falls apart.. everytime, no matter the subject. You should be very angry that they lied to you and I know it sucks when your world view is shattered.
@conradpilapil It's a conspiracy! It's a conspiracy! It's a conspiracy! ... the most sadly pathetic way to defend false ideas. Haven't you noticed that conspiracy theorists are all hopeless losers??? You're totally inexperienced if you really believe science could organise a conspiracy. Who organised this massive conspiracy? The Men in Black who run the world from The United Nations or what? Who?
You fucking child. You're just another hick loser that Jesus gets real embarassed about.
@USERNAMEfieldempty .. yeah.. I don't think you mind will be able to handle the truth.. and judging from your constant ad hominems.. you lack the capacity to carry out a civil dialogue. Everyone can see our back and forth.. I've submitted one fact after another.. and your response is "your stupid".. very compelling for those that lack the ability to do critical thinking. This is my last post to you.. your temper tantrums clearly shows you have nothing left to offer.
... precisely. You believe you can blow a hundred different gaping holes in 21st century science, but you can't differentiate between something as childishly simple as 'you're' and 'your'.
As I said before... only someone of staggeringly little intelligence would dare to challenge the smartest people on the planet (scientists) with embarrassing false arguments like yours.
You are, quite literally, too stupid to realise you are.
I like how this video about evolution starts with an opening of Origins of life. When are people going to get that the origin of life is not what the theory of evolution explains..???
I dont see the big fuss here. Im an atheist, the reason why i dont believe isnt because evolution is real. Evolution isnt enough evidence to disprove god, i dont see what you are afraid of.
If you think "Darwinism" is outdated, then can you tell me what you think of the alternative theory where some magical sky being created the Earth in 5 days and the rest of the universe in 1 day? Is that theory also out of date? It's a few thousand years older than "Darwinism".
I don't think that at all! Can you tell me why you think that I would be thinking it? Don't you think that it would be easy for me (as you think of me that I am fanatic) simply say that evolution was God's way to form life on planet? If it were true...
@sleazybtd Oh, I am sorry, I didn't understand that you really want my opinion. I am used to people have already made their mind about "creationist":) . You already have opinion that ridiculed so many, like Earth is old 6000 years, and so on. I don't believe in that. My opinion is not tied with the teachings of Bible, I am not trying to justify or sacrifice science for some ideology or religion. But Darwinism is ideology. Once I opened my eyes, I cannot believe how they lied to me
@sleazybtd Too many to name... I'll try to upload another video soon, it is called False proofs of evolution. Maybe this will explain better deceit . Anyway, thank you for taking interest.
@Sehara Before you upload the next video, please do proper research before accepting the disproofs as facts.
Christians and muslims have been proven to be liars when they present proof against evolution. I'm talking specifically about people like Harun Yahya. Look up his legal history in Turkey and there are many videos on Youtube debunking the evidence he presents, like fake skulls which he won't let anyone inspect.
@sleazybtd WoW! You really have so much prejudice! Look up why you are looking up legal history in Turkey. Why don't you take this with grain of salt? And calling believing people liars just because of some, how do you justify that? Ok. Muslims and Christians are liars in your eyes. Jews too? If not explain please. And, does that mean that only honest people are atheists? Like Tito was, or Stalin, or...who? No, my friend, you look up
I was looking up Harun Yahya, and found his legal history in Turkey.
When did I call all believers liars? I said that they are liars when they try to prove that evolution is wrong. They can't prove evolution is wrong using the truth, so they use lies. Not all christians and muslims try to disprove evolution.
I don't know about jews. They don't try to prove that evolution is wrong, so I'll assume they are as honest and dishonest as everyone else.
@sleazybtd Liar is a liar, don't you think so? Then why don't you look closely, maybe Darwinists are lying too? If you don't look at all possibilities, what's the point?
@Sehara So you think I don't scrutinize the behaviors of everyone?
People who accept evolution have been telling a consistent story all along and can back up their claims with evidence.
I don't call anti-evolutionists liars because I disagree with them. I call them liars because they've been caught lying many times. Sometimes, they tell complete lies, sometimes, they tell half lies (a lie of omission is still a lie).
i feel so bad for those who have been taught to not believe in evolution. there is more evidence for evolution than most other theories and even laws.
@AntiVenomFangX I was raised in Communism. What do you think they teach you there? What is a main ideology for Communism? DARWINISM EVOLUTION. I know more about evolution you'll ever dream of. But if something doesn't add up, why pretend?
@AntiVenomFangX I was raised in Communism. What do you think they teach you there? What is a main ideology for Communism? DARWINISM EVOLUTION. I know more about evolution you'll ever dream of. But if something doesn't make sense, why pretend?
communism is a form of government. it is not a religious ideology.
thats is as stupid as me pointing out that hitler was a christian, and what do you think he taught?
you dont even know about DNA because if you did you wouldnt be having this conversation with me.... and please spare me from the random facts about DNA that do not contradict evolution. your kind loves non sequitur arguments.
@AntiVenomFangX Wow ! Boy you got nerve! To tell me what Communim is! Like i didn't live and went to school there... You are telling me? Whole ideology is founded on Darwinism and evolution to "prove" that there is no God but we came about a chance. Anyway, since you think you know how it was, there is no point to tallk to you. Think whatever you want, but please watch Expelled No intelligence Allowed buy Ben Stein. It;"ll surprise you unless you are on a Darwinist mission...
its founded on economic and social sciences you fucking moron. darwin has nothing to do with economic sciences, very little to do with social sciences, nothing to do with monetary sciences. it was not founded on evolution you fucking moron.
just because a group of communists tried to force feed you evolution doesnt make it a foundation of communist, stupid.
i'm not even sure if you are serious or just joking.
@AntiVenomFangX Please watch your mouth! There is no need for insults, or you think you are more advanced in evolution? Ha! That proves it! And I am telling you again, you are looking at Darwinism and evolution really wrong way. Of course that evolution has impact on Communism as Darwin work had on Hitler. I guess some people don't scratch deep enough and trying with insults...ccc
@AntiVenomFangX I am saying that Hitler was greatly influenced with Darwin's work and if you read My Kampf, you' probably could see that. It is also well known it is not something I invented... What Hitler thought and believed is not any of my business. I know that he used evolution as an excuse to kill without remorse. I can say what I believe since I grew up learning evolution, so i can understand where you are coming from. I was like you not long ago. Now I know both sides. And you?
@AntiVenomFangX So you think. He thought opposite about Jews. He said that . And FYI he din;t kill only Jews he killed sick, retarded,. weak, Gypsies, Slavic,,... Please, leave me alone. I know that you want to "convince" me
but talking about Hitler with you is pointless if you don't know that much. Or at least to research better.
dont know that much? did you ever see his meetings with the pope? the pope loved him. his army men were strapped with religious texts, do you know who hated the jews at that time? the catholics.
hitler used eugenics not evolution. eugenics has been around waaaayy before darwin or even his great granfather.
I think in most of these arguments come down to personal point of view. I've bounced between pure evolutional theory and an acceptance that a lot of evolutionists aren’t as clever as they think they are. To an extent the argument falls down to whether you believe a God is confined to the rules he made vs. should evidence be irrefutable – I think it should be within the boundary that science should be unbiased.
Yes Darwinism has been abandoned... the current theory is called the Modern Synthesis Theory of Evolution. It is an expansion on earlier works based on discoveries in genetics and in the fossil record that further demonstrates the evolution of species over time.
Just because something looks designed, dosen´t mean that it is. And if you call this place heavenly and specifically "designed" for us, you really don´t know whats going on in the rest of the universe. Just think what happened to dinosaurs, earth has been and will be hit again. There is supernovas exploding every second. Our sun will go off in a bout 5 billion years. And even on earth there is volcanoes, zunamis, earthquakes, hurricanes. Or maybe we are just gods fuck up?
@Sehara Your reasoning isn't very sound. DNA doesn't manufacture amino acids. DNA is made up of amino acids, but it doesn't create them. BUT, to answer your question, amino acids existed before DNA.
It's important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between science and belief systems. Scientific laws and theories are tools used to solve problems. Religions are things you believe in for individual reasons. Evolution is NOT something you believe in. It is a tool used to solve problems... like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems.
@Sehara Your answer is not about evolution, but about abiogenesis, which is a different theory. Genetic mutations are not a theory, they are observable facts, as is the fact that these mutations are transmitted. Evolution exists then as an observable fact. The fact that you don't observe in real life fishes transforming into batracians doesn't contradict a theory that occurs over millions of generations, and proved by DNA evidences and fossils.
ALL scientists know that darwins theory of evolution is FACT, and it has been proven time and time again in many many experiments. This does not mean there is no god and does not mean there is no flaws in his theory. God and Evolution do not have to go hand in hand.
Actually, evolution hasn't been proven through experimentation. It's just been induced from the evidence at hand we have now (and better for it to be that way since if we needed something to evolve in front of our eyes it would most likely take thousands of generations).
BELIEVING in something... hm... isn't that religion? You are saying that we have to beleve in evolution...therefore evolution is a religion. WOW. This is what I was saying too, but it sounds better coming from you. Thank you.
That's really getting picky about what words mean (and quite falsely). "Belief" in itself does not have to involve religion. I, for one, believe that the Earth revolves around the Sun. There is various proof for that which allows me to make that claim with certainty. Does that mean I am subscribing to some kind of "Helicentric" religion? No. If you really want to play with words, then let's be more correct and state that many people infer that evolution is true from the evidence.
Or, if you want to be more accurate, the question would be rather if someone "believes evolution to be true" rather than if they "believe in evolution". The focus in the former is the validity of evolution while in the latter it's attempting to focus on the idea of "belief".
Rather, to state that simply because someone "believes" something that it is a religion is rather false. Unless you think every single thing you believe is religious.
Agree. But I still cannot believe. Your proof of evolution is for me proof that there was no evolution. It is how I see it. I respect your view, but when I look at it, I see no evolution. That doesn't mean that I am uneducated, only that English is my second language (I am from Europe)
Well, an important part of someone believing evolution to be true is to actually understand what the theory of evolution is saying. I am no expert at the theory but I am wondering what parts of it you disagree with.
@Sehara It's important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between science and belief systems. Scientific laws and theories are tools used to solve problems. Religions are things you believe in for individual reasons. Evolution is NOT something you believe in. It is a tool used to solve problems... like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems.
@Rhylias It's important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between science and belief systems. Scientific laws and theories are tools used to solve problems. Religions are things you believe in for individual reasons. Evolution is NOT something you believe in. It is a tool used to solve problems... like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems.
@Sehara Religion is believing in a higher power, not just anything. I believe in the ability of the Pittsburgh Penguins to repeat as Stanley Cup champions, but this is not religion. They just plain kick ass.
@Sehara Believing that there is a computer in front of you isn't religion. Believing that if you let go of a pen in the air, it will fall, is not religion either. Believing something on reasonable, natural grounds is not religious belief at all.
Intelligent, educated people NEVER ask if you believe in evolution. They correct people who pose that question. You be ashamed of your lazy self for not doing your homework. You have no business making videos if you can't take the time to know your opponent.
You get insulted for challenging evolution when you make an idiotic argument, show out dated videos as proof, and lie about evolution being disproved when it is known to be as factual as gravity. If you come up with a good argument without lying, trying to claim something with outdated information, and so on, then you will get into a debate where you actually have to provide evidence and logic behind it, which logic is the next step most creationist fail at because they don't understand it.
Darwinist scientists who uncovered the fossil agree that the fossil they discovered in Kenya is THE SAME WITH THE CONTEMPORARY MAN. Among the foot prints discovered there is also one belonging to a child.The measurements made according to the size of the foot print, gaps between fingers and the depth of the earth reveal that the particular feet print, which was discussed in Science magazine and then in news channels such as Reuters and BBC News, belongs to a human being of 1.79-1.80 (5 feet 9 in
All the proof you will ever get or need that you were created is the fact that you exist. You say you look at the evidence yet you deny that everything that exists came from NOTHING. You cannot explain that , so you look at creation and call IT god. You can't have it both ways. Either the universe has always existed and is itself a personal, living entity OR Jesus Christ is who the Bible declares Him to be: Creator of all things, both visible and invisible. He who was and is and is to come.
You are full of it, because you don't even know what you are talking about. You most likely only made it through high school and didn't get an education past that, except MAYBE you going to a trade school, either way I don't expect you to be able to understand things more basic than, the easiest dumbest possible answer.
You are full of shit with your assumptions too. A universe as an entity or the mythology of Christianity? Yeah right, get our of your fantasy world.
I can tell by your masterful control of the English language that you are a Rhodes Scholar with whom I dare not tangle, but , alas, I will take my chances.
Since you don't seem to believe the universe is eternal and self-existent, I then postulate that there is indeed a personal creator.
I say so for two reasons:
1: The evidence points to that fact.
2: I know Him personally.
Why don't you? (Riddle for you: " if you want to find Him you must l_ _ _ for Him.")
1. No evidence points to it unless you listen to some twit that lies about the evidence.
2. It is all in your head, when you die, you will go no where, there is no afterlife, no god.
Your riddle is foolish, because as studies have already proven, prayer does nothing. Unless you look at one of the one in 1000 studies that says else wise, which is normally done by a bias group in support of religion.
You're responses are not more intelligent than a kid explaining his imaginary friend.
You do not need anyone teach you that there is a God. You are held accountable for that relationship 100%.
I do not need to listen to 'some twit' or some wise man, I need to listen to the call of God who is calling all men to turn around and face Him.
You wish to 'prove' God by Science, but I say to you that you're questioning the existence of the very One who made Science.If you, instead, use Science to make Him known to others and you will find more 'proof' than you can handle. Ask Jesus.
1. There is no God, so no one to listen to, the voices are in your head, that is why people call you a nut job.
2. Man created science, it is all human conceived concepts.
3. You can not make something that doesn't exist known to people by something that requires existence.
4. Jesus most likely never existed, and if he did, he was no the son of god, but just another person that 200 years later people added a resurrection and virgin birth story to.
The need to 'personify' the forces that create the universe, our earth, and the biochemistry that IS life can only be the result of some very LONELY or ego-driven thinking.
As cold, and unemotionally rational as it might be, the answers to creation are 'what' not 'who'.
You are incorrect. The fact that you are a person is proof that the God who spoke all things into existence (from nothing) is a PERSON. We have this discussion because He enabled us to have this discussion. All the proof you will ever need or get that God created all things, including you, is the fact that you exist. That's all it takes and God knows that you know that. Jesus Christ is that God who created all things both visible AND invisible and for His pleasure we exist. I know Him, do you?
I know God exists because I know Him. I cannot prove that to you, but I can tell you that at one point, I didn't know Him, but now I do.
As for evidence that He exists, again, the fact that you exist is all the proof you will ever need, but I understand that you can't get that, because you don't yet know Him. So what I am offering is a way for you to personally know Him, yourself.
Ask Jesus to be your Lord and accept His death on the cross as God's way of paying for your sins. That's it.
I guess they've never seen a pride of lionesses gang up on a water buffalo, clawing and tearing with their teeth at its flesh, ripping it up into a bloody mess.
I guess they've never heard of the wasps that Darwin found upsetting, that paralyze - not kill - an insect and then lay their eggs in its body, so that the eggs can hatch and eat the paralyzed prey from the inside out, while it is still living.
So even when a wasp lays eggs inside of a paralyzed insect, and they hatch and begin consuming the paralyzed prey from the inside out, while it is still alive --- that''s living in perfect harmony????
So when millions of people get infected with the parasites that cause malaria and die, that's living in perfect harmony???
Hmm, what exactly would count as NOT living in perfect harmoney???
Why are you avoiding the issue? Do you consider these examples of "all life living in perfect harmony" or not?
And about the explanation: would you prefer that pitilessly indifferent nature be the cause of these "evils", or your God? I mean, if you want to claim that your God is malevolent, that's fine with me!
I am not avoiding anything. Please watch parts 3, 4 and then coment. I understand your point of view, I was evolutionist myself. So, you found a reason to switch from creationist, I found reason to switch to creationism. No reason to be upset. I explained already that harmony means having purpose. Can you find any living creature that doesn't have puropse, that "evolved" just for fun?
Sehara: I explained already that harmony means having purpose.
***
Well that's just silly. "Purpose" and "perfect harmony" don't mean the same thing. Your just playing around with words to avoid a problem.
And if all life lives in perfect harmony, then how can even one species go extinct without throwing off the perfect harmony? Not to mention >99% of all species that ever existed having gone extinct.
And what is the purpose of the parasite that causes malaria?
I don't see why you don't accept Evolution , it's probably because creationism is written in a 2000 years old Jewish book written by charlatans and con artists who have no life who spread sexism ,stupidity , hate and intolerance ,and homophobia .Open your Mind .
NO need for insults! My mind is open. I am open for any other theory if you have it. Evolution is NOT science. I WAS evolutionist and looking for answers. Your insults showed me that you don't have scientific proof.
just look at history , look at what Creationism did , crusades ,inquisitions ...why should I give you my respect ? respect is earned , and you godbelievers failed .
WOW! You are blaming ME for all that? Do you know me? I could say that for nonbelievers too. I lived under Communism for long time and saw what nonbelievers are capable of doing to others. Do you know how many millions of lives atheism under communism claimed? Blaming each others is not the solution. I am looking for reasonable and scientific explanation, not insults because of what evolution cannot explain.
Where did you get that idea? Please watch some other videos from my channel about evolution collapse. Also, news flash: Dawkins rejected debate about evolution! Reason: He wowed not to have debate! Wowed with who?
Mechanical process of Evolution: Mechanics of reproductive system: How it evolved since there is no chance that failed reproductive organ can correct itself, since it cannot have feedback. How sperm evolved?
Sorry, i thought you are scientist. I am looking for answers. I went to museum too, but didn't find answers. Of course there are fossils of dynosaurus, but there was so many extinct animals on planet. Still, this cannot proove evolution. There is so many "living" fossils on the planet that never changed a bit. So... I am still looking.
I'll try harder. If you look into books on evolution, you'll find that there are certain advantages to sexual reproduction, like better resistance against parasites, preservation of genetic material and stuff like that. Some of them can be shown by mathematical reasoning alone. I guess is that is what one would call the explanation - it is advantageous, therefore sexual reproduction proliferated.
you see, as my earth science teacher told me, fungus and other bacteria came from the volcanoes- the carbon and other products -from when the earth was formed, then the fungus and other stuff evolved into single celled organisms, they didnt reproduce, and then, when they were single celled organisms, they started reproducing massively, and thus, humans were created...
I was told that too in school. It is believable if you teach this to kidds when they are little. But, if you really challenge evolution, you get insults: Believe what I told you! At least in my case it was so.
2) fungi, being eukaryotes, were no where near the first organisms on earth
3) bacteria are already single celled organisms, so saying that bacteria evolved into single celled organisms doesn't make sense
4) it doesn't make sense to say that bacteria didn't reproduce
5) There are a multitude of steps from bacteria to humans: saying single celled organisms started reproducing massively and thus humans were created is way off target
Totally unrealistic and lacking the minimum facts of science. Nature is not perfect. Tsunamis, earthquakes, volcanoes, hurricanes and tornadoes just bring destruction and death. Some animals exists just to live off other species, virus and parasites among them. There are still no known causes for some birth defects in humans. Seems that the intelligent designer didnt made a perfect creation.
Quixotepr 7 months ago
@Quixotepr Can YOU make it better? Why don't you try? Everything happen for the reason...if you don't see it you are missing big picture. But I respect your view. If only more people would free to question evolutionists and make them look for an answer...maybe this world would be better place
Sehara 7 months ago
planets and solar systems have nothing to do with evolution, so I dont care if you used to believe it, you obviously had no idea what it was. OMG, the animals didnt come BEFORE the earth. The earth came first and THEN the animals evolved. Yes, this planet is suitable for life, so what? That doesnt tell you that it is designed at all .THere are billions and billions on planets out there, its pure statistic chance. You didnt present ANYTHING that contradicts evolution, LOL.
gulbirk 9 months ago
Just another believer in mythological fairy tales. There are NO gods.
Allah, Yahweh, Jesus, Vishnu, Apollo, Zeus... They are only mythological fairy tales.
Get over it and learn to deal with real life...
aerhearts 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Allah !? the moon god?!
jfitguru 10 months ago
''I'm a Marine, not a soldier. None of that gear was made with evolution science either.''
Afraid your wrong there, Sporty, the latest generation tech is computer modelled though 10,000s of generations of evolution equations to optimise performance.
Why do you think business/commerce agrees with evolution and the science which surrounds it? Because it makes a shit load of money... because it is true.
Wake up FFS, you're a gun-totin' GI. You have zero knowledge of this subject.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
evolution is just plain stupid. To get to biological evolution, we first have to cross cosmic evolution, then chemical evolution, then stellar evolution, then planetary evolution to finally, Organic evolution. LOL..
The very first one is ludicrous.. and to continue to postulate the rest requires a willing disbelief in facts of basic physics or at least a stretch of those laws beyond logic and the laws itself.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
Believing in evolution isn't just blind faith, you are presented with evidence (of which there is an astonishing amount) and make a logical decision about it. How people can jam their fingers in their ears and deny evolution amazes me
JuiceBoxheero 10 months ago
This video is packed with wrong from start to finish.
Everything said is absolute unsupported religious horseshit.
USERNAMEfieldempty 11 months ago 5
@USERNAMEfieldempty Then why did you watch? And please explain horseshit. I am open minded. Used to believe in evolution too. Untill I started using brain.
Sehara 11 months ago
@Sehara Your vid says
0.32 - 0.40 "Every system operates in accordance with specific laws." ie Scientific laws.
Then
0.38 - 0.44 ''There is a plan, a design and a balance in every part of the univesrse"
which is unproved religious doctrine.
You can't use science to support your God and then ignore the science you don't like. Science told you about the universe, Science told you about evolution. Science does NOT show that life was designed, it shows it evolved. It is a fact.
USERNAMEfieldempty 11 months ago
@Sehara This vid doesnt disprove evolution at all, it doesnt even have anything to do with evolution. Explain to me what evolution has to do with planets or how life came to be?=) Ill give ya a proof of evolution, human cromosome 2. Now give me a prof that evolution does not occur, I truly doubt that you will ever find it because you do not have the understanding. The fact that you do not seem to know what a theory is proves your lack of knowledge.
Sprattelkungen 10 months ago
"He is Allah, the one and only god who created the heavens and the earth from nothing". How can you get something from nothing?
thejacalofskaro74 11 months ago
@thejacalofskaro74 So I guess you don't believe in a Big Bang Theory? Too bad. This is proven with numbers. Unlike Evolution.
Sehara 11 months ago
Funny video.
KeistasZmogelis 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman Yeah ok, great.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
I am not saying that humans have the answer to why the universe exists, but I dont think this is a reason to simply fill the gap with "god did it".
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman Yeah, ok, lets forget the facts, I mean what do they proove, nothing. The truth is obviously in the bible.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman You fill in the gap with religion, fair enough, this takes faith in something that can not be proven. I respect your right to believe in what yo want to believe.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman Also you will notice that I said that the human race has advanced because of he scientific method, wether these people believed in god or not, you can be sure that their experiments were scientific,not based on faith.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman I will not reply to you anymore. Your mind is literally stuck in the middle ages, you are completely blinded by your faith. The last thing i will say is, the differance between me and you is that if you came to me with real evidence for god, I would listen and accept the proof which was shown to me. You on the other hand can have mountains of evidence put before you yet never accept any of it.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
lol, imagine poodles and chiwawas walking along side with dinosaurs. Creationist don't even think of stuff like this.
ZZzzzzzWhat 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman You need to look into what the scientific method is all about. And look at peer reviewed material. The advancements in the mordern world have been achieved by humans adopting a scientific approach.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman I see that you dont believe in evolution. There is definately no point in us carryng on this debate.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@TheHumanbeingHuman This is a long, long debate.I will say though that I came to the conclusion that god is nonsense through my own research. This did mean reading alot of books by as you call it "seems smart" people. This is where your arrogance comes in, you say people that seem smart. Why is is that books written by people using an accumilation of knowledge before them hold less credance with you then ancient texts that are constantly proven false ?
thegarbeen 11 months ago
one thing i would like to ask evolutionists is --- If micro-organisms grew to become fish then amphibians then lizards then dinosaurs and then a meteor hit causing a cloud of dust to cover the earth for more than a year completely wiping out all forms of live, then how did birds and miceout live the dinos when all of the food and water was supposedly toxic for longer than anything could possibly survive without them?
Japheth19 1 year ago
@Japheth19 It didn't wipe out all of the life on earth. The smaller animals survived. The most up to date theory is that the meteor caused massive fires and clouds of dust (like sandstorms) that caused larger animals that lived on land to starve, suffocate, and burn. Smaller burrowing animals (like early mammals), as well as, animals that could survive for extended periods of time (or permanently) underwater (like crocodiles or sharks) survived because they could escape from these things. (pt1)
krisamirault 1 year ago
@Japheth19 How would a meteor make food and water toxic? It would create dirt and mud in the water (you know like water in nature). The water was heated incredibly quickly on the top layer and would and down lower it was cooler. Yes it would have ash and other such things, but it was vaporized and became rain which would filter a fair amount of it. Yes the population was educed drastically, but it was not total extinction. Animals will do anything to survive and some of them succeeded.
krisamirault 1 year ago
Why do religous people want to drag us back hundreds of years. You are sitting here using technology provided to you by modern science to promote false outdated ideas.
thegarbeen 1 year ago
@thegarbeen why do you ateists think you are more advanced it is a mistery! And to calim that only atesists made technology by "modern" science...Please watch Expelled No Intelligence Allowed and see how many respected scientists are bullied just because they asked question. Is that not dragging back hundreds of years? Thank you
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara I'm not saying that atheists are more advanced. I am saying that the human race is more advanced because of the scientific method, claims made by religion simply do not stand up to the same sort of scrutiny.
thegarbeen 1 year ago
@thegarbeen Depends of what calims you are looking. If you are thinking that religious claims are that Earth was made in six millions of years, then you are looking wrong way. There is a religious Book that contains and proves all scientific claims and more and there is no contradiction with science and never changed one letter from the first day. Something to think about: who had a knoledge 1400 years ago that Earth is revolving around a Sun?
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara Name of said book ?
thegarbeen 1 year ago
conradpilapil 11 months ago
@conradpilapil They lived in times when religon was still heavily indoctrinated into people from a young age. I suspect that if them same people were alive today their views would be different, look at the vast majority of nobel prize winning scientists today, most of them are atheist.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@thegarbeen Wow.. really? You "suspect".. that is nice. lol.. Well I "suspect" that they would not have changed their minds. Spare me the Noble Prize people.. they have given that to dictators, and people that have achieved nothing. But, if you wish (if you hold the Nobel Prize so dear) I will generate a list of Christians that have also won them..
conradpilapil 11 months ago
@conradpilapil
Nobel prize winners in the sciences ?
Also do you dispute the fact that the scientists in that list lived in times when people were religious pretty much by default ?
I hold dear the fact that humans have advanced so much in the last 150 years from throwing off the shackles of dogma.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@thegarbeen Yes.. in Sciences.. just do a google search.. that requires no effort. There are also some scientist in those times that did not believe in God.. Don't be so close minded.. you can find Scientist to fit your belief in that time and now. We have advanced so much in the last 150 years because people allowed the results to say what it is .. not changing it to their preconceived notions.
conradpilapil 11 months ago
@conradpilapil hhmmm yes interesting I just took your google advice and it seems that studies in recent years show that in america about 7% of the top scientists believe in god and in the UK about 5%. Thats the top scientists. It seems religious people are the ones who have to cherry pick their experts to fit their beleifs.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@conradpilapil Seriously how can you talk about finding science to "fit your belief" think about your religion and what it actually says. Think about the size of the universe, the amount of time it has been around, think about this earth and what fossil records, carbon dating, dna etc show in terms of an ever changing evolving earth. We are now building up a real picture of what we are and to some extent where we come from, then you turn to me and talk about preconceived notions ?
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@thegarbeen The size of the universe just tells me how great my God is. Your fossile records, carbon dating, dna ect doesn't show evolution, it show that NONE of those things support evolution in anyway. In fact, they all mock evolution. We don't need to "build" a picture of who or what we are.. that has been settled.
conradpilapil 11 months ago
@conradpilapil "your fossil record" "my god" just listen to yourself, you are far away from rationality.
thegarbeen 11 months ago
@conradpilapil
"Your fossile records, carbon dating, dna ect doesn't show evolution, it show that NONE of those things support evolution in anyway. In fact, they all mock evolution."
You are uneducated in science and do not know anything about these subjects. That has been settled simply by reading your confused post. You do not know what you are talking about. You are scientifically illiterate.
USERNAMEfieldempty 11 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty lol.. you seem to think you telling me I'm uneducated makes it true.
1 - Fact, no genetic mutation has ever been recorded where information was added
2 - Fact, carbon dating in not accurate, and live animals have been tested with this and dated in the thousands of years..
3 - Fossiles does not indicate ancestry.. rather death. We have no knowledge that those animals fossilized gave birth to anything, let alone something that it was not. (ie reptiles to birds?)
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil
You are not uneducated beause I say that you are.
You are uneducated because you say that you are.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty oh.. I see. Got it. Once you are done with your ad hominem attacks.. let me know. You can start with what I stated last.. the facts. I really could keep that list going.. but it never really ends. Just for kicks..here is one more
Fact - conservation of angular momentum.. by this law.. we should not have planets spinning in the opposite direction... and to top it off.. same goes for several moons.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil
Would you care to direct me to the world-changing scientific paper which proves basic Newtonian mechanics is completely wrong and that physics has been none-functional since its modern inception??? You have no idea what you're claiming. So I repeat, only a person in possession of a staggering lack of education would try to proudly display brain-turds as stinking as yours.
You, not I, are determined to make you look fucking retarded... So, I guess you must be.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty You are so confused..
Basic Newtonian Mechanics is just fine.. it just poses serious problems to your "I come from a rock.. or worse, nothing" theory. Do, however, keep the snide comments coming. By most debate standards.. this was over long ago with you getting laughed off the stage. And anytime you want to discuss any of the Facts I'm put out there.. do chime in.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil What 'facts' are you ''putting out there''? I see none.
Pick one 'fact' that you have which is not supported by mainstream science and we'll have a look at it, shall we? Give me one 'Creationist Fact'. I've not seen one yet, only massive sweeping genralisations about why science is stupid and wrong. So, Conrad, enlighten me with one creationist fact that is contrary to science, but still a fact.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty .. read messages before this to find those facts..
Why are you regurgitating lies? The words "science is stupid" NEVER came from me.. I said "EVOLUTION is stupid, not supported by science, not verifiable with the scientific method.. ect.
Fact - Polonium halos - no matter how you cut it.. the earth is not millions, let alone billions of years old. The whole earth was created in seconds per evidence shown.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil - Polonium Haloes - a rebutted and rejected claim that polonium in granite can be used to 'prove' the Earth is young. Gentry's original 'proof' was suppositional and inconclusive, and it is countermanded by hundreds of other verifiable tests and proofs that the Earth is ancient. Polonium Haloes were never a fact, they were a hypothesis that did not hold together. (See TalkOrigins for futher info)
Attempt One - FAIL.
Try Again.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty lol.. no it is proof. ALL polonium haloes are "young" compared to evolution. The worst you can do with this is say "no, it took houndreds of years to solidify" which would still destroy evolution.
Attempt One - Game over for you. My sugestion; do your research, and think critically instead of just swallowing what you are given.
Fact 2 - there are no erosion signs in between any of the so called geological column. Surprising since one layer is millions of years old.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil Look, you can't just invent pseudo-facts for your religion. That's called lying. Check the simple scientific literature you'll discover you're completely wrong. It is as simple as that.
This is why both religious people and atheists get very angry with people like you. because you are stubborn to the point of dishonesty.
You are a soldier, aren't you?. But I bet you love all your hi-tech gear, don't you? NONE of that gear was made by creation science. Ask youself why.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty .. okay.. get a local "Science" text book out.. and you will find that most of it is correct ..until you get the "evolution" section.. its very simple. Find the "geological column" .. its a nice picture.. does not exist anywhere in the world. Yes there are layers.. but never in the "correct" order that book says.. plus multiple layers with nothing.. these are facts.. get angry.. they lied to you.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil Re: Geological Column.
Why do the trillion-dollar mining industries and the trillion-dollar oil industry continue to successfully discover deposits based on standard old-earth geology? With that much money at stake, there would be a huge potential for a startling new 'correct' model, if the current old-earth model is wrong. But not one mining or oil company uses the Biblical model to search for deposits. They prefer the success rates provided by the old-earth model.
Why?
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty .. I'm a Marine, not a soldier. None of that gear was made with evolution science either. Thank God.. because it would not stand the test of Marines getting their hands on it.
Lastly, it is common knowledge that evolution - specifically from one species to another - is pseudo science. It has never stood against scruitny. I hate all religions.. including evolution. At the very least, admit that is what you have, a government religion.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty Go back to your "evolution" section.. find the picture of the fetus devoloment - proven to be a fruad. Look it up. That whole section is one lie after another. Tell a lie big enough and loud enough.. and it becomes "trueth" (it helps if the government pays for it too). The only problem is when trueth confronts it.. then it falls apart.. everytime, no matter the subject. You should be very angry that they lied to you and I know it sucks when your world view is shattered.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil It's a conspiracy! It's a conspiracy! It's a conspiracy! ... the most sadly pathetic way to defend false ideas. Haven't you noticed that conspiracy theorists are all hopeless losers??? You're totally inexperienced if you really believe science could organise a conspiracy. Who organised this massive conspiracy? The Men in Black who run the world from The United Nations or what? Who?
You fucking child. You're just another hick loser that Jesus gets real embarassed about.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty .. yeah.. I don't think you mind will be able to handle the truth.. and judging from your constant ad hominems.. you lack the capacity to carry out a civil dialogue. Everyone can see our back and forth.. I've submitted one fact after another.. and your response is "your stupid".. very compelling for those that lack the ability to do critical thinking. This is my last post to you.. your temper tantrums clearly shows you have nothing left to offer.
conradpilapil 10 months ago
@conradpilapil wrote, ''your response is "your stupid" "
... precisely. You believe you can blow a hundred different gaping holes in 21st century science, but you can't differentiate between something as childishly simple as 'you're' and 'your'.
As I said before... only someone of staggeringly little intelligence would dare to challenge the smartest people on the planet (scientists) with embarrassing false arguments like yours.
You are, quite literally, too stupid to realise you are.
USERNAMEfieldempty 10 months ago
Jesus tap-dancin' Christ, America is so embarassing. When are you people going to grow up?
USERNAMEfieldempty 1 year ago
I like how this video about evolution starts with an opening of Origins of life. When are people going to get that the origin of life is not what the theory of evolution explains..???
bttrflykiss7701 1 year ago
I dont see the big fuss here. Im an atheist, the reason why i dont believe isnt because evolution is real. Evolution isnt enough evidence to disprove god, i dont see what you are afraid of.
gulbirk 1 year ago
you can't teach an idiot something like evolution, or that co2 does something.
its not their fault. they were taught no other way
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
@AntiVenomFangX really? Watch "Expelled! No Intelligence Allowed" Ben Stein. Then tell me who is an idiot. Thanks.
Sehara 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sehara
i have seen it....... are you serious?
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
If you think "Darwinism" is outdated, then can you tell me what you think of the alternative theory where some magical sky being created the Earth in 5 days and the rest of the universe in 1 day? Is that theory also out of date? It's a few thousand years older than "Darwinism".
sleazybtd 1 year ago
@sleazybtd
I don't think that at all! Can you tell me why you think that I would be thinking it? Don't you think that it would be easy for me (as you think of me that I am fanatic) simply say that evolution was God's way to form life on planet? If it were true...
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara Uh huh. So you don't believe in creationism when your video title screen states "the fact of creation"
Actually, I only asked you for your opinion about creationism and you completely avoided the question. Why did you not answer the question?
sleazybtd 1 year ago
@sleazybtd Oh, I am sorry, I didn't understand that you really want my opinion. I am used to people have already made their mind about "creationist":) . You already have opinion that ridiculed so many, like Earth is old 6000 years, and so on. I don't believe in that. My opinion is not tied with the teachings of Bible, I am not trying to justify or sacrifice science for some ideology or religion. But Darwinism is ideology. Once I opened my eyes, I cannot believe how they lied to me
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara I don't see how evolution is considered dogma.
What part or parts of evolution do you find to be lies?
sleazybtd 1 year ago
@sleazybtd Too many to name... I'll try to upload another video soon, it is called False proofs of evolution. Maybe this will explain better deceit . Anyway, thank you for taking interest.
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara Before you upload the next video, please do proper research before accepting the disproofs as facts.
Christians and muslims have been proven to be liars when they present proof against evolution. I'm talking specifically about people like Harun Yahya. Look up his legal history in Turkey and there are many videos on Youtube debunking the evidence he presents, like fake skulls which he won't let anyone inspect.
sleazybtd 1 year ago
@sleazybtd WoW! You really have so much prejudice! Look up why you are looking up legal history in Turkey. Why don't you take this with grain of salt? And calling believing people liars just because of some, how do you justify that? Ok. Muslims and Christians are liars in your eyes. Jews too? If not explain please. And, does that mean that only honest people are atheists? Like Tito was, or Stalin, or...who? No, my friend, you look up
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara Read my reply again.
I was looking up Harun Yahya, and found his legal history in Turkey.
When did I call all believers liars? I said that they are liars when they try to prove that evolution is wrong. They can't prove evolution is wrong using the truth, so they use lies. Not all christians and muslims try to disprove evolution.
I don't know about jews. They don't try to prove that evolution is wrong, so I'll assume they are as honest and dishonest as everyone else.
sleazybtd 1 year ago
@sleazybtd Liar is a liar, don't you think so? Then why don't you look closely, maybe Darwinists are lying too? If you don't look at all possibilities, what's the point?
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara So you think I don't scrutinize the behaviors of everyone?
People who accept evolution have been telling a consistent story all along and can back up their claims with evidence.
I don't call anti-evolutionists liars because I disagree with them. I call them liars because they've been caught lying many times. Sometimes, they tell complete lies, sometimes, they tell half lies (a lie of omission is still a lie).
sleazybtd 1 year ago
@Sehara
i feel so bad for those who have been taught to not believe in evolution. there is more evidence for evolution than most other theories and even laws.
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
@AntiVenomFangX I was raised in Communism. What do you think they teach you there? What is a main ideology for Communism? DARWINISM EVOLUTION. I know more about evolution you'll ever dream of. But if something doesn't add up, why pretend?
Sehara 1 year ago
@AntiVenomFangX I was raised in Communism. What do you think they teach you there? What is a main ideology for Communism? DARWINISM EVOLUTION. I know more about evolution you'll ever dream of. But if something doesn't make sense, why pretend?
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara
communism is a form of government. it is not a religious ideology.
thats is as stupid as me pointing out that hitler was a christian, and what do you think he taught?
you dont even know about DNA because if you did you wouldnt be having this conversation with me.... and please spare me from the random facts about DNA that do not contradict evolution. your kind loves non sequitur arguments.
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
@AntiVenomFangX Wow ! Boy you got nerve! To tell me what Communim is! Like i didn't live and went to school there... You are telling me? Whole ideology is founded on Darwinism and evolution to "prove" that there is no God but we came about a chance. Anyway, since you think you know how it was, there is no point to tallk to you. Think whatever you want, but please watch Expelled No intelligence Allowed buy Ben Stein. It;"ll surprise you unless you are on a Darwinist mission...
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara
its founded on economic and social sciences you fucking moron. darwin has nothing to do with economic sciences, very little to do with social sciences, nothing to do with monetary sciences. it was not founded on evolution you fucking moron.
just because a group of communists tried to force feed you evolution doesnt make it a foundation of communist, stupid.
i'm not even sure if you are serious or just joking.
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
@AntiVenomFangX Please watch your mouth! There is no need for insults, or you think you are more advanced in evolution? Ha! That proves it! And I am telling you again, you are looking at Darwinism and evolution really wrong way. Of course that evolution has impact on Communism as Darwin work had on Hitler. I guess some people don't scratch deep enough and trying with insults...ccc
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara
so let me get this straight.... you think hitler wasnt a man of god, but you dont think there is a need for insults?
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
@AntiVenomFangX I am saying that Hitler was greatly influenced with Darwin's work and if you read My Kampf, you' probably could see that. It is also well known it is not something I invented... What Hitler thought and believed is not any of my business. I know that he used evolution as an excuse to kill without remorse. I can say what I believe since I grew up learning evolution, so i can understand where you are coming from. I was like you not long ago. Now I know both sides. And you?
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara
if he was using evolution as an excuse he wouldnt kill one of the most successful groups of humans on earth. he would go after the weakest links
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
@AntiVenomFangX So you think. He thought opposite about Jews. He said that . And FYI he din;t kill only Jews he killed sick, retarded,. weak, Gypsies, Slavic,,... Please, leave me alone. I know that you want to "convince" me
but talking about Hitler with you is pointless if you don't know that much. Or at least to research better.
Sehara 1 year ago
@Sehara
it was 90% jews, lets not pretend here
dont know that much? did you ever see his meetings with the pope? the pope loved him. his army men were strapped with religious texts, do you know who hated the jews at that time? the catholics.
hitler used eugenics not evolution. eugenics has been around waaaayy before darwin or even his great granfather.
i dont expect you to understand
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
@Sehara
eugenics is not evolution. eugenics has been around since before darwins great great grandfathers.
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
I think in most of these arguments come down to personal point of view. I've bounced between pure evolutional theory and an acceptance that a lot of evolutionists aren’t as clever as they think they are. To an extent the argument falls down to whether you believe a God is confined to the rules he made vs. should evidence be irrefutable – I think it should be within the boundary that science should be unbiased.
AndyWhite007 1 year ago
What a total load of bollocks. Same old crap with no evidence. Wishful thinking at it's most base and ignorant level.
PintOThat 1 year ago
Yes Darwinism has been abandoned... the current theory is called the Modern Synthesis Theory of Evolution. It is an expansion on earlier works based on discoveries in genetics and in the fossil record that further demonstrates the evolution of species over time.
stonetop 1 year ago
Dawinism?
Isn't that a bit like Newtonism?
They're both terribly out of date...
Londron 1 year ago
Just because something looks designed, dosen´t mean that it is. And if you call this place heavenly and specifically "designed" for us, you really don´t know whats going on in the rest of the universe. Just think what happened to dinosaurs, earth has been and will be hit again. There is supernovas exploding every second. Our sun will go off in a bout 5 billion years. And even on earth there is volcanoes, zunamis, earthquakes, hurricanes. Or maybe we are just gods fuck up?
SCAREDBANANA 1 year ago
@Sehara Your reasoning isn't very sound. DNA doesn't manufacture amino acids. DNA is made up of amino acids, but it doesn't create them. BUT, to answer your question, amino acids existed before DNA.
blaisingm 1 year ago
It's important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between science and belief systems. Scientific laws and theories are tools used to solve problems. Religions are things you believe in for individual reasons. Evolution is NOT something you believe in. It is a tool used to solve problems... like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems.
blaisingm 1 year ago
Gravity: THEORY
Atom: THEORY
Electro-Magnetism: THEORY
Germs: THEORY
DNA: THEORY
AllOtherNamesTaken2 1 year ago
Comment removed
Tuathalful 1 year ago
@Sehara Amino acids do not require DNA to form. Your information is false.
MrThunderbeast 1 year ago
@Sehara Your answer is not about evolution, but about abiogenesis, which is a different theory. Genetic mutations are not a theory, they are observable facts, as is the fact that these mutations are transmitted. Evolution exists then as an observable fact. The fact that you don't observe in real life fishes transforming into batracians doesn't contradict a theory that occurs over millions of generations, and proved by DNA evidences and fossils.
wollin20 1 year ago
How can you answer the 'chicken or egg' without evolution? Poof?
gregrutz 2 years ago
evolution > any other explanation offered to date.
droogish 2 years ago
As far as I know, NO scientist "believes" in evolution, they accept it as the best scientific explanation for the world as we know it.
TheKilgoretrout 2 years ago 8
@TheKilgoretrout
the same goes for germ theory. they accept it because its the only thing that doesnt make them look stupid.
AntiVenomFangX 1 year ago
ALL scientists know that darwins theory of evolution is FACT, and it has been proven time and time again in many many experiments. This does not mean there is no god and does not mean there is no flaws in his theory. God and Evolution do not have to go hand in hand.
dematt30 2 years ago
Actually, evolution hasn't been proven through experimentation. It's just been induced from the evidence at hand we have now (and better for it to be that way since if we needed something to evolve in front of our eyes it would most likely take thousands of generations).
Rhylias 2 years ago
BELIEVING in something... hm... isn't that religion? You are saying that we have to beleve in evolution...therefore evolution is a religion. WOW. This is what I was saying too, but it sounds better coming from you. Thank you.
Sehara 2 years ago
That's really getting picky about what words mean (and quite falsely). "Belief" in itself does not have to involve religion. I, for one, believe that the Earth revolves around the Sun. There is various proof for that which allows me to make that claim with certainty. Does that mean I am subscribing to some kind of "Helicentric" religion? No. If you really want to play with words, then let's be more correct and state that many people infer that evolution is true from the evidence.
Rhylias 2 years ago
Or, if you want to be more accurate, the question would be rather if someone "believes evolution to be true" rather than if they "believe in evolution". The focus in the former is the validity of evolution while in the latter it's attempting to focus on the idea of "belief".
Rather, to state that simply because someone "believes" something that it is a religion is rather false. Unless you think every single thing you believe is religious.
Rhylias 2 years ago
Agree. But I still cannot believe. Your proof of evolution is for me proof that there was no evolution. It is how I see it. I respect your view, but when I look at it, I see no evolution. That doesn't mean that I am uneducated, only that English is my second language (I am from Europe)
Sehara 2 years ago
Well, an important part of someone believing evolution to be true is to actually understand what the theory of evolution is saying. I am no expert at the theory but I am wondering what parts of it you disagree with.
Rhylias 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Your proof of evolution is for me proof that there was no evolution."
You make it tough to sway you. Ever look at the animals in the Cambrian Period?
gregrutz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sehara It's important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between science and belief systems. Scientific laws and theories are tools used to solve problems. Religions are things you believe in for individual reasons. Evolution is NOT something you believe in. It is a tool used to solve problems... like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems.
blaisingm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Rhylias It's important to understand that there is a BIG, BIG difference between science and belief systems. Scientific laws and theories are tools used to solve problems. Religions are things you believe in for individual reasons. Evolution is NOT something you believe in. It is a tool used to solve problems... like your hammer. You don't believe in your hammer, you use it to solve problems.
blaisingm 1 year ago
Evolution happened, fact, proven.
There is a theory that shows how it happened.
Darwinism is 150 years out of date, now the word it used to show -ism is a religion, it started out meaning a strict following of Darwin's ideas.
gregrutz 2 years ago 2
@Sehara Religion is believing in a higher power, not just anything. I believe in the ability of the Pittsburgh Penguins to repeat as Stanley Cup champions, but this is not religion. They just plain kick ass.
MrThunderbeast 1 year ago
@Sehara Believing that there is a computer in front of you isn't religion. Believing that if you let go of a pen in the air, it will fall, is not religion either. Believing something on reasonable, natural grounds is not religious belief at all.
Potatoflesh 1 year ago
Intelligent, educated people NEVER ask if you believe in evolution. They correct people who pose that question. You be ashamed of your lazy self for not doing your homework. You have no business making videos if you can't take the time to know your opponent.
TheSoSoAgnostic 2 years ago
You get insulted for challenging evolution when you make an idiotic argument, show out dated videos as proof, and lie about evolution being disproved when it is known to be as factual as gravity. If you come up with a good argument without lying, trying to claim something with outdated information, and so on, then you will get into a debate where you actually have to provide evidence and logic behind it, which logic is the next step most creationist fail at because they don't understand it.
nidodson 2 years ago
Darwinist scientists who uncovered the fossil agree that the fossil they discovered in Kenya is THE SAME WITH THE CONTEMPORARY MAN. Among the foot prints discovered there is also one belonging to a child.The measurements made according to the size of the foot print, gaps between fingers and the depth of the earth reveal that the particular feet print, which was discussed in Science magazine and then in news channels such as Reuters and BBC News, belongs to a human being of 1.79-1.80 (5 feet 9 in
Sehara 2 years ago
How human? haha
Probably Homo Sapiens, and not Homo Sapien Sapiens.
nidodson 2 years ago
All the proof you will ever get or need that you were created is the fact that you exist. You say you look at the evidence yet you deny that everything that exists came from NOTHING. You cannot explain that , so you look at creation and call IT god. You can't have it both ways. Either the universe has always existed and is itself a personal, living entity OR Jesus Christ is who the Bible declares Him to be: Creator of all things, both visible and invisible. He who was and is and is to come.
donsteigerwald 2 years ago
You are full of it, because you don't even know what you are talking about. You most likely only made it through high school and didn't get an education past that, except MAYBE you going to a trade school, either way I don't expect you to be able to understand things more basic than, the easiest dumbest possible answer.
You are full of shit with your assumptions too. A universe as an entity or the mythology of Christianity? Yeah right, get our of your fantasy world.
nidodson 2 years ago
nidiot,
I can tell by your masterful control of the English language that you are a Rhodes Scholar with whom I dare not tangle, but , alas, I will take my chances.
Since you don't seem to believe the universe is eternal and self-existent, I then postulate that there is indeed a personal creator.
I say so for two reasons:
1: The evidence points to that fact.
2: I know Him personally.
Why don't you? (Riddle for you: " if you want to find Him you must l_ _ _ for Him.")
If you don't, you won't.
donsteigerwald 2 years ago
Except
1. No evidence points to it unless you listen to some twit that lies about the evidence.
2. It is all in your head, when you die, you will go no where, there is no afterlife, no god.
Your riddle is foolish, because as studies have already proven, prayer does nothing. Unless you look at one of the one in 1000 studies that says else wise, which is normally done by a bias group in support of religion.
You're responses are not more intelligent than a kid explaining his imaginary friend.
nidodson 2 years ago
You do not need anyone teach you that there is a God. You are held accountable for that relationship 100%.
I do not need to listen to 'some twit' or some wise man, I need to listen to the call of God who is calling all men to turn around and face Him.
You wish to 'prove' God by Science, but I say to you that you're questioning the existence of the very One who made Science.If you, instead, use Science to make Him known to others and you will find more 'proof' than you can handle. Ask Jesus.
donsteigerwald 2 years ago
Hahahaha, you really are uneducated aren't you.
1. There is no God, so no one to listen to, the voices are in your head, that is why people call you a nut job.
2. Man created science, it is all human conceived concepts.
3. You can not make something that doesn't exist known to people by something that requires existence.
4. Jesus most likely never existed, and if he did, he was no the son of god, but just another person that 200 years later people added a resurrection and virgin birth story to.
nidodson 2 years ago
OIC - simple answers for the simple minded!
TheSoSoAgnostic 2 years ago
Thank you.
Sehara 3 years ago
The need to 'personify' the forces that create the universe, our earth, and the biochemistry that IS life can only be the result of some very LONELY or ego-driven thinking.
As cold, and unemotionally rational as it might be, the answers to creation are 'what' not 'who'.
bencubed 3 years ago
You are incorrect. The fact that you are a person is proof that the God who spoke all things into existence (from nothing) is a PERSON. We have this discussion because He enabled us to have this discussion. All the proof you will ever need or get that God created all things, including you, is the fact that you exist. That's all it takes and God knows that you know that. Jesus Christ is that God who created all things both visible AND invisible and for His pleasure we exist. I know Him, do you?
donsteigerwald 2 years ago
" the God who spoke all things into existence (from nothing) is a PERSON ..."
This is nothing more than regurgitation of primitive musings.
How do you know that if a god really exists, it isn't some other form of life or energy?
Why must he be like us (a person) ?
-
" If triangles had a god, it would have three sides" .
-
"I know Him, do you?"
Possibly you are confusing your social-moral conscience ( which we all have in different forms) with your God.
-
bencubed 2 years ago
Ben3,
I know God exists because I know Him. I cannot prove that to you, but I can tell you that at one point, I didn't know Him, but now I do.
As for evidence that He exists, again, the fact that you exist is all the proof you will ever need, but I understand that you can't get that, because you don't yet know Him. So what I am offering is a way for you to personally know Him, yourself.
Ask Jesus to be your Lord and accept His death on the cross as God's way of paying for your sins. That's it.
donsteigerwald 2 years ago
The atmosphere and all the complexity of the interaction of life is the result of the design and plan of a single intelligent creator?
Tell me you are joking.
bencubed 3 years ago
All life lives in perfect harmony?
I guess they've never seen a pride of lionesses gang up on a water buffalo, clawing and tearing with their teeth at its flesh, ripping it up into a bloody mess.
I guess they've never heard of the wasps that Darwin found upsetting, that paralyze - not kill - an insect and then lay their eggs in its body, so that the eggs can hatch and eat the paralyzed prey from the inside out, while it is still living.
And so on.
DNAunion 3 years ago
"Living in perfect harmony" means that all life on Earth have purpose. Animal behavior is not excuse for people to behave like them.
Sehara 3 years ago
So even when a wasp lays eggs inside of a paralyzed insect, and they hatch and begin consuming the paralyzed prey from the inside out, while it is still alive --- that''s living in perfect harmony????
So when millions of people get infected with the parasites that cause malaria and die, that's living in perfect harmony???
Hmm, what exactly would count as NOT living in perfect harmoney???
DNAunion 3 years ago
And you exlain all that with Darwinism? Good one!
Sehara 3 years ago
Why are you avoiding the issue? Do you consider these examples of "all life living in perfect harmony" or not?
And about the explanation: would you prefer that pitilessly indifferent nature be the cause of these "evils", or your God? I mean, if you want to claim that your God is malevolent, that's fine with me!
DNAunion 3 years ago
I am not avoiding anything. Please watch parts 3, 4 and then coment. I understand your point of view, I was evolutionist myself. So, you found a reason to switch from creationist, I found reason to switch to creationism. No reason to be upset. I explained already that harmony means having purpose. Can you find any living creature that doesn't have puropse, that "evolved" just for fun?
Sehara 3 years ago
***
Sehara: I explained already that harmony means having purpose.
***
Well that's just silly. "Purpose" and "perfect harmony" don't mean the same thing. Your just playing around with words to avoid a problem.
And if all life lives in perfect harmony, then how can even one species go extinct without throwing off the perfect harmony? Not to mention >99% of all species that ever existed having gone extinct.
And what is the purpose of the parasite that causes malaria?
DNAunion 3 years ago
I don't see why you don't accept Evolution , it's probably because creationism is written in a 2000 years old Jewish book written by charlatans and con artists who have no life who spread sexism ,stupidity , hate and intolerance ,and homophobia .Open your Mind .
christe68 3 years ago
NO need for insults! My mind is open. I am open for any other theory if you have it. Evolution is NOT science. I WAS evolutionist and looking for answers. Your insults showed me that you don't have scientific proof.
Sehara 3 years ago
just look at history , look at what Creationism did , crusades ,inquisitions ...why should I give you my respect ? respect is earned , and you godbelievers failed .
christe68 3 years ago
WOW! You are blaming ME for all that? Do you know me? I could say that for nonbelievers too. I lived under Communism for long time and saw what nonbelievers are capable of doing to others. Do you know how many millions of lives atheism under communism claimed? Blaming each others is not the solution. I am looking for reasonable and scientific explanation, not insults because of what evolution cannot explain.
Sehara 3 years ago
I sent you private mesage.
Sehara 3 years ago
"Darwinism is nothing more than a belief!"
Do you not see the irony in that?
hairyreasoner 3 years ago
Yes, I do.
Sehara 3 years ago
So, you are making fun of creationists?
hairyreasoner 3 years ago
Where did you get that idea? Please watch some other videos from my channel about evolution collapse. Also, news flash: Dawkins rejected debate about evolution! Reason: He wowed not to have debate! Wowed with who?
Sehara 3 years ago
Creationists have already pulled their retarded, lying little tricks on Dawkins. He knows Creationists can't be trusted.
DNAunion 3 years ago
what is still a theory ? the mechanical process of Evolution is FACT , the cause is the Theory , not Evolution itself .
You don't believe in theories ? so you don't believe in Gravity too ?
christe68 3 years ago
Mechanical process of Evolution: Mechanics of reproductive system: How it evolved since there is no chance that failed reproductive organ can correct itself, since it cannot have feedback. How sperm evolved?
Sehara 3 years ago
why are you asking me ? I'm not a Scientist ,did you not know that ?
I saw the proof with my own eyes when I went to the Museum .
christe68 3 years ago
Sorry, i thought you are scientist. I am looking for answers. I went to museum too, but didn't find answers. Of course there are fossils of dynosaurus, but there was so many extinct animals on planet. Still, this cannot proove evolution. There is so many "living" fossils on the planet that never changed a bit. So... I am still looking.
Sehara 3 years ago
I'll try harder. If you look into books on evolution, you'll find that there are certain advantages to sexual reproduction, like better resistance against parasites, preservation of genetic material and stuff like that. Some of them can be shown by mathematical reasoning alone. I guess is that is what one would call the explanation - it is advantageous, therefore sexual reproduction proliferated.
christe68 3 years ago
This is adaptation you are talking about.
Sehara 3 years ago
you see, as my earth science teacher told me, fungus and other bacteria came from the volcanoes- the carbon and other products -from when the earth was formed, then the fungus and other stuff evolved into single celled organisms, they didnt reproduce, and then, when they were single celled organisms, they started reproducing massively, and thus, humans were created...
christe68 3 years ago
I was told that too in school. It is believable if you teach this to kidds when they are little. But, if you really challenge evolution, you get insults: Believe what I told you! At least in my case it was so.
Sehara 3 years ago
1) fungi are not bacteria
2) fungi, being eukaryotes, were no where near the first organisms on earth
3) bacteria are already single celled organisms, so saying that bacteria evolved into single celled organisms doesn't make sense
4) it doesn't make sense to say that bacteria didn't reproduce
5) There are a multitude of steps from bacteria to humans: saying single celled organisms started reproducing massively and thus humans were created is way off target
DNAunion 3 years ago
For the origin of sperm and eggs ...
I can't get the URL to post. Try Googling the following terms, keeping the quotes:
"colonial volvocaceans swimming gametes"
and then find the link that starts with ww w.ncbi.nlm.nih.go v/books
DNAunion 3 years ago
"Many believe that if you don't believe in evoution, it is impossible to be scientist. So not true!"
Actually, it is true