Jonathan Barnett on fire and steel

[Merlin5by5]

I HOPE that somewhere, Youtube videos count as proof of ANYTHING,

but I doubt that will ever happen. In the meantime, Conspiracy NUTJOBS

like Daddy0930, and Skeptic, are pretty much sucking the public ass.

Not a pretty image.

[Daddyo930]

Looks like the debunkies are clearing out. Less and less of them. The truth hits everybody. 911 was an inside job and science video after science video proves it.

watch?v=--_RGM4Abv8

That's another reason why 911 was an inside job.

[Merlin5by5]

I don't see how a video SHOWING steel progressively failing in a TWO story WPI fire deebunks the NIST conclusion that SIX simultaneous floors after 104 minutes of 1000 C fires and 160 TONS of impacting airliner CRASHING into a steel web, and destroying 1/4 of the steel support on ONE side of the building. Maybe the Conspiracy Kooktards can explain how a fire test without an airliner impact can mimic a MUCH LARGER, HOTTER fire, with an airliner impact.

I seem to have missed that, LOL.

[Skeptic121]

@Merlin5by5 Which plane hit WTC7, war hero? BTW, can you remember any of the junior officers or senior NCOs with whom you supposedly served, poser?

[Merlin5by5]

@Skeptic121

That would be WTC 1 that hit the WTC 7. You want to see PICTURES of WTC 1

creating a 10-12 story GASH into the building from floor 17 down to floor 5?

watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U&feature=pl­ayer_embedded#at=44

BTW, I sure can remember the Junior Officers and NCOs that I served with,

Cockroach, can you remember which one of your "UNCLES" stayed longer

than the 1/2 hour your Mom charged him for?

[Skeptic121]

@Merlin5by5 How about some NAMES of officers and NCOs? I enjoyed fucking your mother and your sister and your daughters very much, thank you. 

[Skeptic121]

Read what Prof. Barnett wrote in FEMA Appendix C. He comes as close to the truth as anyone could and not be fired.

He showed that VERY hot sulfur gas hit the steel, melting and evaporating "Swiss cheese" holes and leaving iron sulfide around the border. Iron sulfide CANNOT have come from calcium sulfate in drywall; that is a chemical impossibility. A fire burning in air does NOT make sulfide or sulfur from sulfate. Sulfur and sulfide BURN in air, making sulfur dioxide.

Answer: thermate

[Merlin5by5]

@Skeptic121

Really? Is that why Professor Barnett totally dismissed the possibility of THERMATE,

at WTC 7 or WTC 1, where the sulfidation was discovered on HORIZONTAL beams

far removed from any collapse points? Quote. "Thermate has 29% Barium Nitrate,

compared to 2% sulfur. The sulfidation areas are physically SMALL, below the

collapse floors in both WTC 7 and WTC 1, and are horizontal floor beams, NOT

related to vertical support." Barium Nitrate is FLUORESCENT, and should have

litup the debris

[Skeptic121]

@Merlin5by5 Barium nitrate makes thermate easier to ignite but is NOT required for it to cut steel. Barnett examined ONE piece of debris from WTC7. Was he LAZY? No. He was not allowed to examine more debris; instead, the debris was recycled in Asia with unseemly haste. You cannot conclude the piece he studied was the only one in the debris. What about those officers and NCOs, my hero?

[Merlin5by5]

@Skeptic121

BARIUM NITRATE is what makes thermate burn hotter, not easier to ignite.

SULFUR makes it easier to ignite, and its used in GUNPOWDER for the same

effect, Dumbass. You are totally 100% back asswards.

WTC7, THERMITE/ATE, MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A36 STEEL FROM WTC # 7

tms. org/ pubs/ journals/ JOM/0112/ Biederman/ Biederman-0112. html

The debris samples from the 6 WTC fire and impact floors were saved.

NONE of the recycled steel was on the collapse floors.

BIG BIG FAIL, LMAO

[Skeptic121]

@Merlin5by5 It was WTC7, asshole. The one that fell down. Not WTC6.

Sulfur in thermate serves to CUT the STEEL, not to make the mix easier to ignite.

Barnett complained about not being able to study more steel from WTC7.

Do YOU know more about his work than he does?

BTW, have you stopped claiming you served in Vietnam?

[Merlin5by5]

@Skeptic121

YOU are a complete idiot. Sulfur in thermite lowers the ignition point, which

is what EUTECTIC actually means, MORON. A lower ignition and melting point

than any of the components. Look it up yourself, don't just suck Gages dick, LOL.

Walking CRAP like you has to learn your limitations, and one is CHEMISTRY.

SO, YEAH, I do know more than Barret, and considerable more.

And no, I haven't claimed a thing. I served in Vietnam. And you did not.

I win again.

[Merlin5by5]

@Skeptic121

BY THE WAY, if you want some of the over 10,000 TONS of WTC steel saved

from the SIX FIRE FLOORS of Both WTC towers (Since your reading

comprehension is so low, I can't repeat 6 wtc fire and impact floors),

You can probably visit your local fire department, and find some.

The Secret NWO PANY and SILVERSTEIN Jewish conspiracy has been

handing it out to Memorials for about 6 years.

[Merlin5by5]

@Skeptic121

Oh, BY THE WAY, little piss-ant, I was an MOS 18C/D, and I honor my real

army history, and I doubt crack whore members of the Baby Boomer FILTH

generation, the worst American Generation EVER, could ever understand.

That FILTH, SHIT, DISGUSTING CRAP generation is YOU.

[Skeptic121]

@Merlin5by5 Your mom is a Navy whore for sure!

[Merlin5by5]

@Skeptic121

Why don't you just admit you are an ignorant faggot, without a college degree,

and I doubt you got your GED for that matter. Go ahead, it's a catharsis,

and it totally explains your frilly panties.

[Merlin5by5]

By the way again, my Mom is a 30 year Navy wife. She could bitch slap you

every day for a week, and still move a household on 24 hours notice.

You couldn't fuck her with that wee willie, she would laugh at it.

Everybody else sure does.

[shutupashley]

Okay so we get the point FIRE DIDN'T BRING DOWN THE TOWERS, what did?

People who were in the towers said they heard explosions everywhere, before and after the plane hit.

[NanoThermite911]

The NIST Report clearly states that the building will fall apart if you only remove the girder shear studs from the wide flange support structure of the building, heat only the steel and not the concrete directly attached to it, and apply the heat so quickly that thermal conductivity can't dissipate the heat into the rest of the steel structure.

So all we would have to do is paint nanothermite on all the beams and remove the shear studs. That's according to the NIST model. Is it not?

[Skeptic121]

Prof. Barnett came as close as anyone could to saying WTC7 was a controlled demolition without actually using those words. He received a generous grant from the federal government and stopped talking about WTC7. Google Prof. Van Romero for a similar story. Then read about Steven Jones, who persisted in denying the official story. The "good career move" is obvious.

[UndercoverCracker]

What the fuck it wasnt god damn bombs!!! Yes the fire was hot enough!!! Yes the metal cannot the load so it collapsed.

[Skeptic121]

Would you like to try again?

Would you like to sober up first?

[UndercoverCracker]

I hate you conspiracy theory fagots. lol

[Skeptic121]

UndercoverCracker:

Go ahead and call me a faggot when we meet in person in Downingtown, PA at the 360 gym on Lancaster Avenue.

Don't show up drunk or they won't let you in.

[UndercoverCracker]

Oh fuck off fool. I think somethings stuck up your ass...wonder what it is?

[Skeptic121]

UndercoverCracker:

Let me spell it out for you: You are a coward.

[UndercoverCracker]

You are more of a coward than I could ever be you conspiracy loving nut.

[Skeptic121]

The gym is open today....and all this week!

[Dragon22873]

I think that stupid fuck is brainwashed by the media and his government.

[Skeptic121]

Folks, I don't criticize Prof. Barnett. He said what he wanted to say. He took the government money but he did NOT parrot the official story.

UndercoverCracker is not even worth listening to when he's sober...why would anyone listen to him when he's drunk...which seems to be most of the time.

[PoliticsandPower]

@UndercoverCracker Couldnt agree with you more.