The title of this video made me laugh, then it made me kind of sad. Then I watched the video, and it made me even more sad.
Its not the first time i've done this though.
When I was in elementary school, there was this kid named teddy. Everyone called him teddy bear. me and my brothers used to pick on him and chase him home from school. That same school year, he died from cancer. I've never felt so ashamed of myself before, or even to this day.
@chadd990 As children, we can often do things that can be cruel. You are no longer in elementary school, and while you should certainly repent of what was done previously, you don't have to be in bondage to it. You can come to Jesus Christ and be forgiven of your sin, cleansed, and given a new heart - one that is filled with His love to share with others.
Come to Jesus so that any burdens may be lifted and you can find joy & peace in Him...as well as bring joy & peace to others.
u CAN still just "repent" to URSELF, & convict URSELF of ur own "sin"/"shame" by making a concious effort to watch out for & stand up to bullying (but always be ready to show pity & not become the bully yourself), to help those in trouble, to walk little old ladies across the street & get cats out of trees, general "do-gooder stuff" like that.
u DON'T need a "religion" just to make the world a better place is my point, no offence anyone.
@homerbear46 The only problem with this is that no amount of "good works" is going to erase the fact that he is a sinner. It will not undue the dins already committed...and those which continue to be in the future.
The only person who has paid the price for man's sin as a sinless offering is Jesus Christ and it is only faith in Him - not "religion" - that can save man from the penalty or wages of sin, which is death.
Even if your claim about some sort of NWO thing going on with the government and medical institutions, chemo has been shown to work quite effectively. Herbs and plants etc have some active components and a lot of in-active components that may do more harm than good. If those alternatives are good, try extracting the active parts in the proper amounts. Research, publish, ???, profit. On the alternatives side, there's also a lot of con men and scams so be careful on either side :-)
Yes, be God-led either way. This is not a blanket endorsement of all alternatives. However, at the same time, one cannot expect that the propaganda often penned as "research" is the truth. It simply is not...especially when the ones paying for the research are the ones promoting the drugs.
Bottom line is that there are many other effective means for treating cancer beyond chemo. Chemo is promoted because that is the money maker. The love of money remains the root of all evil.
The first words out of the county attorneys mouth, "He's going to die without the chemo," were wrong, but he speaks them like it's a foregone conclusion or a fact and it's not when you have other ways that work effectively with the body. Research the cancer category on naturalnews.tv and listen to interviews with people who have recovered.
The majority of chemo patients do recover and have a higher chance of survival, the ones that don't live propigate the media and therefore they are used as a precedent to the argument on why chemo does not work. However of all the people that are diagnosed with cancer in the world, this makes up a very small number of patients. Yes it is a very risky and painful medicine and does not always work. But in most cases of cancer survivors, chemo does in fact help.
Depends on how you define "work". By industry standards, a cancer patient only has to be cancer-free after chemo/rad for 5 years to be considered "cured" even if the cancer returns after. The reported success numbers are full of people whose cancer comes back. So, one must understand what is behind the numbers.
The video acknowledges that chemo/rad is "a" treatment & works for some. However, being the one option promoted does not make it the most effective or only treatment available.
In an attempt to curtail time spent regurgitating the same things, please search on Youtube for:
"Natural Defenses in Preventing and Treating Cancer" by Dr. David Servan-Schreiber
Dr. Schreiber had chemo/rad, but the cancer returned (as it often does with those treatments). He had to learn to adopt natural treatments in order to finally remove the cancer.
Again, I didn't use ANY chemo/rad, but natural treatments alone - and the power of Jesus Christ - and I was healed.
If you want more info on the conflicts of interest in the Pharma indistry that produce junk science, search on Youtube for: "Big Pharma Big Bucks"
And search on the Internet for: "American Greed" pfizer CNBC
Watching those will give you just a LITTLE insight into why what some call "science" is largely manufactured MARKETING for big business. The processes of R&D, Clinical trials, FDA approvals, etc. are largely flawed and corrupt.
Based on this info above, I will not be approving any more comments about how only that which is FDA approved is "scientifically" true. Enough info has been provided both in these videos and the comments for those who want to know the truth, to finally know the truth.
@Ainesis3 Seriously? You should really consider doing some research. Chemotherapy DRAMATICALLY increases your odds of survival. Cancer is not like other diseases, it is not an infection, it is your own body turning on itself. I constantly hear morons claiming that modern medicine is ineffective against cancer. These people are willfully ignorant. A small amount of research will show you that survival rates for virtually all cancers have skyrocketed in recent decades, largely due to chemotherapy.
Perhaps you should take your own advice? A little research - rather than drinking the pharmaceutical Kool-Aid which is put forth by businesses trying to increase market share - can go a long ways.
I have never said that what you call "modern medicine" is ineffective against cancer. Such would be a foolish statement. What I have said is that there are treatments outside of chemo which are just as effective (and more so)...but again, such info requires that one actually researches the issue.
@Ainesis3 Not because it obliterates the immune system but because, like any treatment, it's not 100% effective. My grandmother died of cancer on boxing day 2010. The cancer was caught in an extremely late stage but she decided to try the chemo anyway - being a nurse she knew about these things. Before she died, she agreed to participate in a clinical trial to determine what markers in a person's blood might show how effective the treatment will be. Her chemo failed to shrink any of her tumours.
Chemo does obliterate the immune system. That is why anyone receiving chemo treatments must also have their white blood cell count monitored because it shows the signs of the immune system being compromised.
I am sorry for your grandmother's death, but it sounds like you know very little about cancer or its treatments.
@Ainesis3 chemo is also known during wars as mustard gas. It was designed to kill. Why then, would it suddenly 'cure' when a person with a comprosmised immune system (as cancer patients have, or they wouldn't have cancer in the first place) has it injected into them? Are you also aware that most chemo treatments have listed in their side effects another form of cancer. Usually leukemia. Chemo kills all cells, whether healthy or mutated. Most people die from the so called treatment of the cancer
@gangstagrannie This is true. When I spoke with the oncologist about his recommended chemo "cocktail", I was shocked to see that this treatment was also known to CAUSE cancer. One sure cannot say that Satan doesn't have a sense of humor...unfortunately, it is at man's expense.
I cannot say which treatment anyone should use. But, I can surely say - as a living witness - that chemo is NOT the only or even best treatment; further, the industry itself is full of conflicts of interest.
@Ainesis3 thanks for replying - so nice to see that someone else has researched this. I was diagnosed with breast cancer september 2009 and told that if I didnt have hospital 'treatment' immediately I would die. 2 yrs on and I look and feel healthier than I have for years. I've also removed part of my very large tumour with a substance called black salve. (look it up) It works. However, it is very painful for internal tumours and the UK cancer act of 1939 prohibits my GP from giving me morphine
@gangstagrannie I was told the same thing by my oncologist. That I would "die" if I did not get the chemo and radiation. He even read me mortality rates. I am sure he was doing what he felt was best, and I was happy to follow his recommended treatment until Jesus told me not to. 3 days before chemo was to start, He told me "No." and that He had another path of treatment for me. That is when I started looking into this and found the numerous viable alternatives.
@gangstagrannie My treatment - Protocel - is not painful and can be taken with no affect on one's quality of life. While California prevents doctors from treating cancer with anything but chemo/radiation, the way that the industry is set-up, it really doesn't even need laws to that affect. They highly influence medical education curricula, control the medical research, and financially benefit the government "watchdog". No wonder the truth is so suppressed.
@Ainesis3 I'd ordered some protocel (strangely a day or two before i saw this vid) and I'm planning to try that - not brave enough just yet to try the black salve again, but I know it works so I'm keeping it in mind for any possible 'emergency'. At the moment I'm trying the budwig diet (flaxseed oil and cottage cheese) and I've heard good things about it. It's actually quite nice! Any ideas if the two treatments can be combined? if so I'll do that. If not, then I'll rethink it again ;)
@gangstagrannie Protocel can't be used with budwig diet and it does take time to work out. It is by no means a quick fix. It is very gentle, just killing off the anaerobic cells (i.e. cancer cells), but the lysing takes time.
The protocel did remove one tumor and kept my cancer tumor markers in the normal range, so I know it works. The cancer tumor markers being normal is also how they monitor the success of chemo.
@Ainesis3 (continued) or any other help in alternative medicine. The UK cancer act of 1939 is very interesting and I only became aware of it a few months ago.. It's there for all to see on the UK govt website yet people have no clue. (quote) "An Act to make further provision for the treatment of cancer, to authorise the Minister of Health to lend money to the National Radium Trust, to prohibit certain advertisements relating to cancer, and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid."
In DYING TO HAVE KNOWN, filmmaker Steve Kroschel [documents] the testimonies of patients, scientists, surgeons and nutritionists who testify to the [Gerson] therapy’s efficacy in curing cancer... and presents the hard scientific proof to back up their claims... the question that remains is, “Why is this powerful curative therapy still suppressed, more than 75 years after it was clearly proven to cure degenerative disease?”
The kid is old enough to make his own choice, it may not be the right choice, and he should have all things explained to him of what could or will happen but it is his choice it is his body, I myself have myeloblastic leukemia (M2; with cell maturation I am tired after chemothreapy i get very sick I have lost alot of weight now I am 23 and this is a young boy but.... his mom shouldnt have did what she did but he knows how he feels** yah know???
Your promotion of relying on alternative treatments is dangerous. Yes chemo and radiation has side effects, so do all treatments. If they are recommended it is because the benefits outweigh the risk. Currently there are no treatments that I am aware of that only attack cancer cells, though there is much research being done in this field and they have made some great progress. Cancer, like most disorders, is more complex than most are aware of and much can depend on cellular pathways affected.
And your dismissal of alternative treatments out of hand demonstrates a lack of knowledge. The treatment I took has no side effects and attacks ONLY anaerobic cells.
There are various effective, successful alternative treatments for cancer. People should start researching the options on their own. I too was ignorant of these things before looking into them, but I am living proof that it is true.
@Ainesis3 I'm not saying you should never look at alternative treatments, but why this is dangerous is people will have the idea not to listen to your doctor and most alternative treatments are bogus. And your claim the your treatment attack only anaerobic cells is a bogus claim since cancer cells are not anaerobic. For this to happen the mitochondria would have to be lost in our cells and cells CANNOT survive without mitochondria and are therefore not found in the body ever.
I cannot help what "ideas" people get. I have never instructed individuals to reject conventional medicine.
Regarding the anaerobic nature of cancer cells, Otto Warburg won the Nobel Prize for this discovery in 1931. So perhaps you should research this topic more before speaking about things of which you are apparently unfamiliar.
@Ainesis3 When looking at alternatives, you need to be careful. I have seen many claims made by companies or groups that are completely bogus (some make me laugh they so outrageous). So the advise to abandon conventional treatment for alternative treatments altogether is dangerous cause some might do so and take a bogus alternative that cost them their life. I do agree with the idea of educating yourself of all possibilities but you should be careful of those that make bogus claims.
Tell me where I said all claims to alternative treatments are true? Tell me also where I say that people should abandon conventional treatments for alternatives? I can answer that for you: no where. This what you are assuming, but never what I have said.
One needs to be careful about ANY treatment accepted for sickness. Pharma companies are not non-profit organizations. They are in a business to make money and sell a product. For people to blindly think they are altruistic is in error.
Good that you recovered from cancer - best wishes from my side.
But... how to say that in a kind way? You are a dangerous person when you sell anecdotal evidence about a sensitive medical topic in public!
Fact is: Sometimes people recover spontaneously from fatal diseases. That happens - at the same rates - to christians, moslems hindus, atheists, good people and bad people.
If only faithful people would spontaneously recover, you would have a point.
I can't account for "anecdotal" stories about spontaneous recovery. I can only testify to what has happened in my own life...and who has done it. The only danger in sharing the truth is in having lies exposed.
I find it no more irresponsible to share my story than it is for the medical establishment to pretend that chemo & radiation is always the most effective treatment for cancer. May each do as he is led.
Thank you very much for your well wishes. May God be glorified in all He does.
I don't think the average person understands what cancer is, it's literaly just damaged cells out of control. Infact most people don't know that they have cancer a couple times a day. Usualy your body fights off and kills small cancers in your body if they are slow, but quicker ones slip by. A slower cancer can be treated with less agressive means, but agressive fast moving cancers need more agressive treatments like chemo, radiation ect. Treatment depends on the type of cancer you have.
chemotherapy is based on radiation, WTF, that is very much condusive to cancer, plus, u'r not dealing with the root of the problem, but just stopping or delaying it
Each to his own indeed. But we are dealing with a child here, and the state has a duty of care to all children as - sadly - parents can be negligent or even abusive. Denying the most effective care could be termed negligence, if not abuse. Unlike alternative medicine, chemo is proven effective compared to doing nothing, hence the vastly improved cancer survival rates we now have compared to 50 years go.
Apparently it is not to each his own when one has a choice?
What must be considered is that medicine is big business. These are not non-profit entities. What is "proven effective" is based on what they want to endorse. The process itself is flawed in that the exchange of money between pharmaceuticals, med schools, doctors, and the FDA creates a broken, compromised system. There is no objective voice representing the people.
What if what is "proven" is really only what is permitted?
In some states doctors can lose their license for recommending ANY cancer treatment other than chemo. We are not speaking about open panels who equally weigh options.
The same ones who fund research, are the same ones supporting universities and curriculum development, are the same ones who pay the FDA for "approval" and are the same ones who give doctors monetary incentives for prescriptions.
Look deeper into these conflicts of interest and you will see where I am coming from.
I doubt that most healthcare systems, which are not all as crooked as the US model, would continue with costly medical procedures were it not for the fact that they are well understood in terms of how they work, and are effective.
Re 'conflicts of interest' I would say that the field of 'Alternative Therapies' does profiteer from the desparation of cancer sufferers who either cannot afford, or fear chemo, which I admit, is not pleasant (my godson has had it to treat his Ewings Sarcoma).
Alternatives are openly evaluated and supported in other developed countries. Just not here.
Yes, many attempt to mislead and profit from other's sickness, but that is true for the alternative AND pharma markets.
I am not saying that the alternative market is filled with a bunch of do-gooders. I am saying that the very foundation of "medicine" in this country is skewed only towards that which can be used to make money.
Chemotherapy is nothing to do with radiation. I suspect you do not understand what cancer is, or how these treatments work, but yet you encourage others to be sceptical.
These therapies do deal with the root of the problem, in that they target rapidly dividing cells (in the case of chemo) or are directed to the tumour (in the case of radio).
I never said such. You are attributing a commentors statements to me. I know that chemo and radiation are not the same things.
They DO NOT deal with the ROOT of the problem. They blast everything in the hopes of also killing the cancer.
Chemo cannot distinguish between the healthy rapidly dividing cells and the cancerous ones. Therefore, it kills many healthy cells in the process, adversely affecting other aspects of your body and causing more health problems not related to the cancer.
Radiation goes to any area in which it is targeted, not just the cancerous area. It is also known to cause cancer.
Ina book used to help prepare children to understand these treatments, chemo was described as a giant trampling all of the flowers in the garden in order to kill off the bad ones. It is a perfect description.
It such treatments dealt with the "root", then it would not adversely affect other parts of the body not impacted by the cancer, which both chemo and radiation DO.
Not all theists believe this. My father & I were raised Muslim. My grandfather, the 1st to be born Muslim was raised Catholic. Both my Catholic & Muslim relatives who are all theists have always taken our children to the hospital for med. treatment. P.E.A.C.E.
Gosh people just need to stay out of others lives. IF he didn't want the Cemo and she didn't want the Cemo then fine let him live with the cancer, thats his choice! As much as I wanted my aunt to get Cemo she said "No, whats meant to happen will happen" and she ended up dying a month later!
LOL. An unborn baby with no consciousness and a 12 year old person are two different things. The kid was given a few weeks to live if he didn't get IMMEDIATE help. On top of that, Chemotherapy was the ONLY known effective treatment for that type of cancer. Your video is tainted and uneducated...sorry.
You seem to be convinced of a global health conspiracy where multinational organizations are trying to keep the 'real' medicine away from people with cancer to protect their profits, have you considered that the alternitive medicines don't work either and that it was your own body that destroyed the cancer? testimonials are useless with drugs like the one you are advertising, Of course anyone still alive is going to think its because of the drugs they took. If you want to prove it, do a trial.
Simply BUSINESSES that are out to maximize profit (like any business) which people MISTAKENLY believe is some altruistic, non-profit endeavor for the benefit of mankind.
Keeping "real medicine" away from people? No.
In some cases chemo may work. However, these companies DO collude with the government to protect their market share by promoting their products as the only "real" options. Again, that is simply a matter of running a business.
Is it Coca-Cola's job to sing the praises of Pepsi? Or is it their job to gain a majority of the market by influencing consumers towards their brands and against others?
How do I know that my own body didn't cure the cancer? Because the doctor's monitored me before and during the treatments. When the treatment stopped too soon, the cancer returned. When the treatment resumed, the cancer went away. The blood tests, PET scans, MRIs, mammograms, and CT scans themselves tell the story.
The reason the judges decided it was medical neglect is because Chemo is the best known way of curing Cancer. It kills cancer cells and normal cells, while also stimulating the normal cells to grow so that the cancer can be repressed. By denying her son what is statisticly his best chance at survival, she is giving him a death sentence. Just because someone is your child does not mean you own, them, if you abuse your child, or medically neglect them, you don't get to make dicisions for them.
People have this belief (not based in fact) that all options for cancer treatment are being publicly vetted, tested and tracked and that chemo has risen to the top as the most effective. Not so.
There is tremendous effort to ensure that ONLY chemo is considered valid so as to protect profits.
The stats supporting Chemo are stacked to MAKE chemo the most effective treatment, not based on actual comparative results, but marketing spin.
This is really sad. The chemo therapy doesn't belong near the body. Its unnatural. The government is just worried that they will find a natural way to cure people from cancer, and they will lose money and power over people.
sorry, double post. The fact that religion is involved at all is coincidental. To deny the child treatment, for any reason, is neglectful. Chemo is not the only option, but it is a very successful one. If you need further proof that the boy was neglected, try the fact that he is 13 and can't read. He shows no sign of any sort of mental handicap, yet he can't read. Sounds to me like someone should have stepped in long ago.
I understand your point. My position is not about this specific family, but about how the media is portraying the entire thing. It is VERY much being portrayed in an anti-religious light. They never discuss the actual alternatives. They discuss the "proven" "effective" "conventional" chemo vs. "mysterious and spiritual" ideals of "prayer" and "faith".
Ok, I can see your point there as well. I generally stay away from mass media, as they do tend to spin the truth to match their own objectives. I also have no problem with people having faith, or praying for a loved one's recovery, I just don't think that anyone should rely on faith and prayer alone.
I can say that I certainly relied on prayer and faith when I was diagnosed. And I would have done what Jesus said regardless. But He led me to a treatment called Protocel that removed all of my cancer and the left-over tumor - with no side effects.
Thanks for taking the time to explain your perspective!
I know this topic can raise strong emotions on many sides. I don't mind discussion or stating your views, but we will remove posts if they get out of hand.
you all need to get your heads out of your asses. don't be so quick to turn everything into an anti-religious conspiracy. When a parent is neglectful, they have no business raising children. If the parents are making a decision that will ultimately kill their children, then someone needs to step in.
Why don't you start by taking your own recommendation first?
The unstated erroneous assumption your comment is that chemo is the only viable option. Who told you that? What proof do you have that this is true? Or, do you usually just follow what you are told?
Substantiate your implied assertions that no other treatment can work and you might have the basis for a reasonable argument.
Pay attention to what I said. I NEVER said that chemo was the only way to tread cancer, I merely stated that everyone should stop turning this into an anti-religious conspiracy.
SETH Group ... "Herbal (THC) compound kills brain Cancer Cells - but not normal brain cells."
Dr. Guzman ... "THC can promote the autophagic death of human and mouse Cancer Cells"
Dr. Mechoulam ... "we gave THC oil drops 400 times to children 1 -13 years old with Cancer & prevented vomiting & nausea 100%"
Links to my previous 7 comments are located in my youtube page in my primary, secondary video & the last 5 comments are located below my profile picture.
The family's idea of 'cure' involves ionized water and magic ritual. This is not medically valid as 'cures' for cancer. Anyone with any sense of rationality can understand this.
That is an untrue claim regarding the treatment they were going to pursue. And I am assuming you are in a position to determine what is "medically valid"?
The treatment which removed cancer from my body is listed on the FDA's list of "Fake Cancer Cures".
If you are looking for what is rational, why don't you look into the cozy relationship between the FDA and Big Pharma?
It's neglectful behavior on the parents side and the poor boy is too young to form his own opinion on the matter because his parent's most likely brain washed him into believing into this bull crap miracle cure will work. Ionized water, whole grains and prayer is not a cure for cancer, it's the average person's breakfast.
Chemotherapy is currently the most successful treatment of cancer and it has worked for hundreds of thousands of people. People WILL die if they leave cancer untreated.
I was told I would die without chemo and radiation. I did not. In fact, my natural alternative treatment removed the cancer from my body.
People are so quick to believe what they are fed. Chemo IS touted as the most successful treatment. Ever wonder why that is? It is not hard to find out why. Do your research.
LOL! According to who? Because the medical industry considers it "working" as long as the cancer is gone for 5 years. If the cancer comes back after that, you are still a statistical "cure."
Further, because it damages the immune system so, chemo can cause a bunch of other ailments from which you can die while still being counted as a statistical "success".
Again, do your own research or just keep reciting the party line. But don't try to pass that off as knowledge.
You can't refute an argument by saying "according to who? lolz" You know damn well according to who, the American Cancer Association. My friend's mother had breast cancer. She took chemotherapy and it killed all of the cancer cells. Not only that but she completely recovered he health. So don't tell me that I have no knowledge of the matter you twat. You're not a rebel because you disbelieve in the way society thinks and acts, you're just a rebel for the sake of being a rebel.
The bottom line is that there are MANY other ways to treat cancer other than chemo that are ALSO successful. The ACS and FDA only track and report on chemo because they are in bed with Big pharma.
Again, believe what you wish, but the evidence about successful alternate treatments as well as the conflicts with pharma companies are out there for anyone who wants to see.
Who are you to determine what is neglectful? They are NOT refusing treatement rather they are trying a different option because he already had some chemo and it did not work! Its amazing how you eat up the biased media. Pretty soon the government will come for your kids! Pretty soon they will coem for your neighbors kids!
"Some "chemo won't cure the cancer. It takes repeated dosages in order to get rid of it all. This bullcrap religious treatment has been refuted thousands of times by the medical experts in the American Cancer Association. In fact, their "miracle cure" is more along the lines of an average person's breakfast, not a cure for cancer.
Where is the evidence they did magick ritual retard? Have you seen the court documents to make such a claim? Or are you eating up what the media claims to be true?
Wait, so youre going to tell the scientists who went through years of school that theyre wrong?
WonderfulDenmark 1 month ago
@WonderfulDenmark Right, because we ALL know that "years of school" equates to truth. LOL
Ainesis3 1 month ago
The title of this video made me laugh, then it made me kind of sad. Then I watched the video, and it made me even more sad.
Its not the first time i've done this though.
When I was in elementary school, there was this kid named teddy. Everyone called him teddy bear. me and my brothers used to pick on him and chase him home from school. That same school year, he died from cancer. I've never felt so ashamed of myself before, or even to this day.
chadd990 5 months ago
@chadd990 As children, we can often do things that can be cruel. You are no longer in elementary school, and while you should certainly repent of what was done previously, you don't have to be in bondage to it. You can come to Jesus Christ and be forgiven of your sin, cleansed, and given a new heart - one that is filled with His love to share with others.
Come to Jesus so that any burdens may be lifted and you can find joy & peace in Him...as well as bring joy & peace to others.
Ainesis3 5 months ago
@chadd990 OR,u don't have to join a religion.
u CAN still just "repent" to URSELF, & convict URSELF of ur own "sin"/"shame" by making a concious effort to watch out for & stand up to bullying (but always be ready to show pity & not become the bully yourself), to help those in trouble, to walk little old ladies across the street & get cats out of trees, general "do-gooder stuff" like that.
u DON'T need a "religion" just to make the world a better place is my point, no offence anyone.
XD
homerbear46 1 week ago
@homerbear46 The only problem with this is that no amount of "good works" is going to erase the fact that he is a sinner. It will not undue the dins already committed...and those which continue to be in the future.
The only person who has paid the price for man's sin as a sinless offering is Jesus Christ and it is only faith in Him - not "religion" - that can save man from the penalty or wages of sin, which is death.
Ainesis3 1 week ago
u need the chemo. I am going through chemo for non hodkins, and they caught it late, and before i started it, i felt BAD. i hope he contiuned
adkgirlsince01 7 months ago
@adkgirlsince01 I hope that you feel better soon and that the disease is sent into remission.
Ainesis3 7 months ago
@Ainesis3 Yes thank you. Only 3 more left!!! BUT im right in the middle of my chemo wall because i just had it on Tuseday...
adkgirlsince01 7 months ago
Even if your claim about some sort of NWO thing going on with the government and medical institutions, chemo has been shown to work quite effectively. Herbs and plants etc have some active components and a lot of in-active components that may do more harm than good. If those alternatives are good, try extracting the active parts in the proper amounts. Research, publish, ???, profit. On the alternatives side, there's also a lot of con men and scams so be careful on either side :-)
FHomeBrew 11 months ago
Yes, be God-led either way. This is not a blanket endorsement of all alternatives. However, at the same time, one cannot expect that the propaganda often penned as "research" is the truth. It simply is not...especially when the ones paying for the research are the ones promoting the drugs.
Bottom line is that there are many other effective means for treating cancer beyond chemo. Chemo is promoted because that is the money maker. The love of money remains the root of all evil.
Ainesis3 10 months ago
The first words out of the county attorneys mouth, "He's going to die without the chemo," were wrong, but he speaks them like it's a foregone conclusion or a fact and it's not when you have other ways that work effectively with the body. Research the cancer category on naturalnews.tv and listen to interviews with people who have recovered.
js7un 1 year ago
The majority of chemo patients do recover and have a higher chance of survival, the ones that don't live propigate the media and therefore they are used as a precedent to the argument on why chemo does not work. However of all the people that are diagnosed with cancer in the world, this makes up a very small number of patients. Yes it is a very risky and painful medicine and does not always work. But in most cases of cancer survivors, chemo does in fact help.
LernToSpeel 1 year ago
Depends on how you define "work". By industry standards, a cancer patient only has to be cancer-free after chemo/rad for 5 years to be considered "cured" even if the cancer returns after. The reported success numbers are full of people whose cancer comes back. So, one must understand what is behind the numbers.
The video acknowledges that chemo/rad is "a" treatment & works for some. However, being the one option promoted does not make it the most effective or only treatment available.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
In an attempt to curtail time spent regurgitating the same things, please search on Youtube for:
"Natural Defenses in Preventing and Treating Cancer" by Dr. David Servan-Schreiber
Dr. Schreiber had chemo/rad, but the cancer returned (as it often does with those treatments). He had to learn to adopt natural treatments in order to finally remove the cancer.
Again, I didn't use ANY chemo/rad, but natural treatments alone - and the power of Jesus Christ - and I was healed.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
If you want more info on the conflicts of interest in the Pharma indistry that produce junk science, search on Youtube for: "Big Pharma Big Bucks"
And search on the Internet for: "American Greed" pfizer CNBC
Watching those will give you just a LITTLE insight into why what some call "science" is largely manufactured MARKETING for big business. The processes of R&D, Clinical trials, FDA approvals, etc. are largely flawed and corrupt.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
Based on this info above, I will not be approving any more comments about how only that which is FDA approved is "scientifically" true. Enough info has been provided both in these videos and the comments for those who want to know the truth, to finally know the truth.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
No, you don't have the right to kill your child. that's what child protective services are for.
theneonfire 1 year ago
So I've jsut been diagnosed with cancer, I think I'm going to go in the woods and pick up a twig and eat it.
I'll surely be cured then.
P.S. the kid died. Just thought you would like to know. :)
TheJoanjoan18 1 year ago
Then thank you for proving my point. Many who do the chemo route eventually wind up dieing because that poison obliterates the immune system.
If you really have cancer, then I pray that you will truly find the best approach for treating it. Unfortunately, I know of no cure for idiocy.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
@Ainesis3 Seriously? You should really consider doing some research. Chemotherapy DRAMATICALLY increases your odds of survival. Cancer is not like other diseases, it is not an infection, it is your own body turning on itself. I constantly hear morons claiming that modern medicine is ineffective against cancer. These people are willfully ignorant. A small amount of research will show you that survival rates for virtually all cancers have skyrocketed in recent decades, largely due to chemotherapy.
compactdisk2 1 year ago
Perhaps you should take your own advice? A little research - rather than drinking the pharmaceutical Kool-Aid which is put forth by businesses trying to increase market share - can go a long ways.
I have never said that what you call "modern medicine" is ineffective against cancer. Such would be a foolish statement. What I have said is that there are treatments outside of chemo which are just as effective (and more so)...but again, such info requires that one actually researches the issue.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
@Ainesis3 Not because it obliterates the immune system but because, like any treatment, it's not 100% effective. My grandmother died of cancer on boxing day 2010. The cancer was caught in an extremely late stage but she decided to try the chemo anyway - being a nurse she knew about these things. Before she died, she agreed to participate in a clinical trial to determine what markers in a person's blood might show how effective the treatment will be. Her chemo failed to shrink any of her tumours.
tammyscotland 1 year ago
Chemo does obliterate the immune system. That is why anyone receiving chemo treatments must also have their white blood cell count monitored because it shows the signs of the immune system being compromised.
I am sorry for your grandmother's death, but it sounds like you know very little about cancer or its treatments.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
@Ainesis3 chemo is also known during wars as mustard gas. It was designed to kill. Why then, would it suddenly 'cure' when a person with a comprosmised immune system (as cancer patients have, or they wouldn't have cancer in the first place) has it injected into them? Are you also aware that most chemo treatments have listed in their side effects another form of cancer. Usually leukemia. Chemo kills all cells, whether healthy or mutated. Most people die from the so called treatment of the cancer
gangstagrannie 8 months ago
@gangstagrannie This is true. When I spoke with the oncologist about his recommended chemo "cocktail", I was shocked to see that this treatment was also known to CAUSE cancer. One sure cannot say that Satan doesn't have a sense of humor...unfortunately, it is at man's expense.
I cannot say which treatment anyone should use. But, I can surely say - as a living witness - that chemo is NOT the only or even best treatment; further, the industry itself is full of conflicts of interest.
Ainesis3 8 months ago
@Ainesis3 thanks for replying - so nice to see that someone else has researched this. I was diagnosed with breast cancer september 2009 and told that if I didnt have hospital 'treatment' immediately I would die. 2 yrs on and I look and feel healthier than I have for years. I've also removed part of my very large tumour with a substance called black salve. (look it up) It works. However, it is very painful for internal tumours and the UK cancer act of 1939 prohibits my GP from giving me morphine
gangstagrannie 8 months ago
@gangstagrannie I was told the same thing by my oncologist. That I would "die" if I did not get the chemo and radiation. He even read me mortality rates. I am sure he was doing what he felt was best, and I was happy to follow his recommended treatment until Jesus told me not to. 3 days before chemo was to start, He told me "No." and that He had another path of treatment for me. That is when I started looking into this and found the numerous viable alternatives.
Ainesis3 8 months ago
@gangstagrannie My treatment - Protocel - is not painful and can be taken with no affect on one's quality of life. While California prevents doctors from treating cancer with anything but chemo/radiation, the way that the industry is set-up, it really doesn't even need laws to that affect. They highly influence medical education curricula, control the medical research, and financially benefit the government "watchdog". No wonder the truth is so suppressed.
Thanks for sharing!
Ainesis3 8 months ago
@Ainesis3 I'd ordered some protocel (strangely a day or two before i saw this vid) and I'm planning to try that - not brave enough just yet to try the black salve again, but I know it works so I'm keeping it in mind for any possible 'emergency'. At the moment I'm trying the budwig diet (flaxseed oil and cottage cheese) and I've heard good things about it. It's actually quite nice! Any ideas if the two treatments can be combined? if so I'll do that. If not, then I'll rethink it again ;)
gangstagrannie 8 months ago
@gangstagrannie Protocel can't be used with budwig diet and it does take time to work out. It is by no means a quick fix. It is very gentle, just killing off the anaerobic cells (i.e. cancer cells), but the lysing takes time.
The protocel did remove one tumor and kept my cancer tumor markers in the normal range, so I know it works. The cancer tumor markers being normal is also how they monitor the success of chemo.
All the best & Godspeed for your efforts! :-)
Ainesis3 8 months ago
@Ainesis3 (continued) or any other help in alternative medicine. The UK cancer act of 1939 is very interesting and I only became aware of it a few months ago.. It's there for all to see on the UK govt website yet people have no clue. (quote) "An Act to make further provision for the treatment of cancer, to authorise the Minister of Health to lend money to the National Radium Trust, to prohibit certain advertisements relating to cancer, and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid."
gangstagrannie 8 months ago
THE CURE FOR CANCER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In DYING TO HAVE KNOWN, filmmaker Steve Kroschel [documents] the testimonies of patients, scientists, surgeons and nutritionists who testify to the [Gerson] therapy’s efficacy in curing cancer... and presents the hard scientific proof to back up their claims... the question that remains is, “Why is this powerful curative therapy still suppressed, more than 75 years after it was clearly proven to cure degenerative disease?”
watch?v=G4XZzhJfHFE
Valerian1 1 year ago
The kid is old enough to make his own choice, it may not be the right choice, and he should have all things explained to him of what could or will happen but it is his choice it is his body, I myself have myeloblastic leukemia (M2; with cell maturation I am tired after chemothreapy i get very sick I have lost alot of weight now I am 23 and this is a young boy but.... his mom shouldnt have did what she did but he knows how he feels** yah know???
heatherwolf2704 1 year ago
Good video, but a better title would be: I Thought I Had The Right to CURE My Children.
carlosk2x 1 year ago
screw the goverment. my goodness , this country says we have rights , and freedom just look at this case , just look
bluegrassman776 1 year ago
Your promotion of relying on alternative treatments is dangerous. Yes chemo and radiation has side effects, so do all treatments. If they are recommended it is because the benefits outweigh the risk. Currently there are no treatments that I am aware of that only attack cancer cells, though there is much research being done in this field and they have made some great progress. Cancer, like most disorders, is more complex than most are aware of and much can depend on cellular pathways affected.
vnorthru 1 year ago
And your dismissal of alternative treatments out of hand demonstrates a lack of knowledge. The treatment I took has no side effects and attacks ONLY anaerobic cells.
There are various effective, successful alternative treatments for cancer. People should start researching the options on their own. I too was ignorant of these things before looking into them, but I am living proof that it is true.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
@Ainesis3 I'm not saying you should never look at alternative treatments, but why this is dangerous is people will have the idea not to listen to your doctor and most alternative treatments are bogus. And your claim the your treatment attack only anaerobic cells is a bogus claim since cancer cells are not anaerobic. For this to happen the mitochondria would have to be lost in our cells and cells CANNOT survive without mitochondria and are therefore not found in the body ever.
vnorthru 1 year ago
I cannot help what "ideas" people get. I have never instructed individuals to reject conventional medicine.
Regarding the anaerobic nature of cancer cells, Otto Warburg won the Nobel Prize for this discovery in 1931. So perhaps you should research this topic more before speaking about things of which you are apparently unfamiliar.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
@Ainesis3 When looking at alternatives, you need to be careful. I have seen many claims made by companies or groups that are completely bogus (some make me laugh they so outrageous). So the advise to abandon conventional treatment for alternative treatments altogether is dangerous cause some might do so and take a bogus alternative that cost them their life. I do agree with the idea of educating yourself of all possibilities but you should be careful of those that make bogus claims.
vnorthru 1 year ago
Tell me where I said all claims to alternative treatments are true? Tell me also where I say that people should abandon conventional treatments for alternatives? I can answer that for you: no where. This what you are assuming, but never what I have said.
One needs to be careful about ANY treatment accepted for sickness. Pharma companies are not non-profit organizations. They are in a business to make money and sell a product. For people to blindly think they are altruistic is in error.
Ainesis3 1 year ago
Good that you recovered from cancer - best wishes from my side.
But... how to say that in a kind way? You are a dangerous person when you sell anecdotal evidence about a sensitive medical topic in public!
Fact is: Sometimes people recover spontaneously from fatal diseases. That happens - at the same rates - to christians, moslems hindus, atheists, good people and bad people.
If only faithful people would spontaneously recover, you would have a point.
But that's not the case.
smarthandsomeguy 2 years ago
I can't account for "anecdotal" stories about spontaneous recovery. I can only testify to what has happened in my own life...and who has done it. The only danger in sharing the truth is in having lies exposed.
I find it no more irresponsible to share my story than it is for the medical establishment to pretend that chemo & radiation is always the most effective treatment for cancer. May each do as he is led.
Thank you very much for your well wishes. May God be glorified in all He does.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
>"I can't account for "anecdotal" stories about spontaneous recovery"
I wanted to point out, that your story is anecdotal. ;-)
>"I can only testify to what has happened in my own life"
And that's precisely, why it's anecdotal.
You can not possibly know why you recovered, because you can not set up a double blind test.
Btw: Do you believe, that atheists spontaneously recover at the same rates for the same reason you recovered?
smarthandsomeguy 2 years ago
I can know because God has told me why I recovered. What I know is not defined by what you believe (or dispute).
Ainesis3 2 years ago
I don't think the average person understands what cancer is, it's literaly just damaged cells out of control. Infact most people don't know that they have cancer a couple times a day. Usualy your body fights off and kills small cancers in your body if they are slow, but quicker ones slip by. A slower cancer can be treated with less agressive means, but agressive fast moving cancers need more agressive treatments like chemo, radiation ect. Treatment depends on the type of cancer you have.
bmw5234 2 years ago
chemotherapy is based on radiation, WTF, that is very much condusive to cancer, plus, u'r not dealing with the root of the problem, but just stopping or delaying it
killzer48 2 years ago
Not according to the docs, who still cannot find ANY cancer in my body.
Chemo is poison. And there are MANY people whose cancer returns based on the damage chemo does to the immune system.
Yet, to each his own. I don't need anyone to validate my experience. I am a living testimony thanks be to God! Thank You Jesus!
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Each to his own indeed. But we are dealing with a child here, and the state has a duty of care to all children as - sadly - parents can be negligent or even abusive. Denying the most effective care could be termed negligence, if not abuse. Unlike alternative medicine, chemo is proven effective compared to doing nothing, hence the vastly improved cancer survival rates we now have compared to 50 years go.
dogblessamerica 2 years ago
Apparently it is not to each his own when one has a choice?
What must be considered is that medicine is big business. These are not non-profit entities. What is "proven effective" is based on what they want to endorse. The process itself is flawed in that the exchange of money between pharmaceuticals, med schools, doctors, and the FDA creates a broken, compromised system. There is no objective voice representing the people.
What if what is "proven" is really only what is permitted?
Ainesis3 2 years ago
In some states doctors can lose their license for recommending ANY cancer treatment other than chemo. We are not speaking about open panels who equally weigh options.
The same ones who fund research, are the same ones supporting universities and curriculum development, are the same ones who pay the FDA for "approval" and are the same ones who give doctors monetary incentives for prescriptions.
Look deeper into these conflicts of interest and you will see where I am coming from.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
I doubt that most healthcare systems, which are not all as crooked as the US model, would continue with costly medical procedures were it not for the fact that they are well understood in terms of how they work, and are effective.
Re 'conflicts of interest' I would say that the field of 'Alternative Therapies' does profiteer from the desparation of cancer sufferers who either cannot afford, or fear chemo, which I admit, is not pleasant (my godson has had it to treat his Ewings Sarcoma).
dogblessamerica 2 years ago
Alternatives are openly evaluated and supported in other developed countries. Just not here.
Yes, many attempt to mislead and profit from other's sickness, but that is true for the alternative AND pharma markets.
I am not saying that the alternative market is filled with a bunch of do-gooders. I am saying that the very foundation of "medicine" in this country is skewed only towards that which can be used to make money.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Chemotherapy is nothing to do with radiation. I suspect you do not understand what cancer is, or how these treatments work, but yet you encourage others to be sceptical.
These therapies do deal with the root of the problem, in that they target rapidly dividing cells (in the case of chemo) or are directed to the tumour (in the case of radio).
dogblessamerica 2 years ago
I never said such. You are attributing a commentors statements to me. I know that chemo and radiation are not the same things.
They DO NOT deal with the ROOT of the problem. They blast everything in the hopes of also killing the cancer.
Chemo cannot distinguish between the healthy rapidly dividing cells and the cancerous ones. Therefore, it kills many healthy cells in the process, adversely affecting other aspects of your body and causing more health problems not related to the cancer.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Radiation goes to any area in which it is targeted, not just the cancerous area. It is also known to cause cancer.
Ina book used to help prepare children to understand these treatments, chemo was described as a giant trampling all of the flowers in the garden in order to kill off the bad ones. It is a perfect description.
It such treatments dealt with the "root", then it would not adversely affect other parts of the body not impacted by the cancer, which both chemo and radiation DO.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Not all theists believe this. My father & I were raised Muslim. My grandfather, the 1st to be born Muslim was raised Catholic. Both my Catholic & Muslim relatives who are all theists have always taken our children to the hospital for med. treatment. P.E.A.C.E.
TribeofShabazz 2 years ago
Gosh people just need to stay out of others lives. IF he didn't want the Cemo and she didn't want the Cemo then fine let him live with the cancer, thats his choice! As much as I wanted my aunt to get Cemo she said "No, whats meant to happen will happen" and she ended up dying a month later!
kimkyok 2 years ago
LOL. An unborn baby with no consciousness and a 12 year old person are two different things. The kid was given a few weeks to live if he didn't get IMMEDIATE help. On top of that, Chemotherapy was the ONLY known effective treatment for that type of cancer. Your video is tainted and uneducated...sorry.
GrantmotherTubes 2 years ago
No need to be sorry, just try actually getting real information next time before you post.
If you have no knowledge about alternative cancer treatments, that is okay.
If you believe an unborn baby has no consciousness in spite of long-standing medical evidence to the contrary, that is okay too.
But don't try to pass off your uninformed opinion as being substantive knowledge, because it is clear that you don't have any in this area.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
GOOD POINT!! Abortion is ok, but if you wanna try heal your child YOUR WAY, it's a problem..
Soul4JC 2 years ago
You seem to be convinced of a global health conspiracy where multinational organizations are trying to keep the 'real' medicine away from people with cancer to protect their profits, have you considered that the alternitive medicines don't work either and that it was your own body that destroyed the cancer? testimonials are useless with drugs like the one you are advertising, Of course anyone still alive is going to think its because of the drugs they took. If you want to prove it, do a trial.
crimsonfist3 2 years ago
A health conspiracy? No.
Simply BUSINESSES that are out to maximize profit (like any business) which people MISTAKENLY believe is some altruistic, non-profit endeavor for the benefit of mankind.
Keeping "real medicine" away from people? No.
In some cases chemo may work. However, these companies DO collude with the government to protect their market share by promoting their products as the only "real" options. Again, that is simply a matter of running a business.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Is it Coca-Cola's job to sing the praises of Pepsi? Or is it their job to gain a majority of the market by influencing consumers towards their brands and against others?
How do I know that my own body didn't cure the cancer? Because the doctor's monitored me before and during the treatments. When the treatment stopped too soon, the cancer returned. When the treatment resumed, the cancer went away. The blood tests, PET scans, MRIs, mammograms, and CT scans themselves tell the story.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
First, I didn't take a drug. Second, if my testimonial is useless, then so are the ones supporting chemo.
"Do a trial?" Give me a break. There has been a trial for Protocel and the government admitted that it fights cancer.
Further clinical trials are funded by drug companies and they manage the data. Research the ethics and conflicts around clinical trials.
Is it smart to rely on ANY industry as THE source of objective data about its products? No it is not.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Chemo kills most patients not the cancer...it is funny how most people don't actually feel sick from the cancer until they start taking chemo!
gkh11 2 years ago
The reason the judges decided it was medical neglect is because Chemo is the best known way of curing Cancer. It kills cancer cells and normal cells, while also stimulating the normal cells to grow so that the cancer can be repressed. By denying her son what is statisticly his best chance at survival, she is giving him a death sentence. Just because someone is your child does not mean you own, them, if you abuse your child, or medically neglect them, you don't get to make dicisions for them.
crimsonfist3 2 years ago
Yet what if this is not true?
People have this belief (not based in fact) that all options for cancer treatment are being publicly vetted, tested and tracked and that chemo has risen to the top as the most effective. Not so.
There is tremendous effort to ensure that ONLY chemo is considered valid so as to protect profits.
The stats supporting Chemo are stacked to MAKE chemo the most effective treatment, not based on actual comparative results, but marketing spin.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
This is really sad. The chemo therapy doesn't belong near the body. Its unnatural. The government is just worried that they will find a natural way to cure people from cancer, and they will lose money and power over people.
ChekSewdah 2 years ago
sorry, double post. The fact that religion is involved at all is coincidental. To deny the child treatment, for any reason, is neglectful. Chemo is not the only option, but it is a very successful one. If you need further proof that the boy was neglected, try the fact that he is 13 and can't read. He shows no sign of any sort of mental handicap, yet he can't read. Sounds to me like someone should have stepped in long ago.
StrangeOne1987 2 years ago
NP!
I understand your point. My position is not about this specific family, but about how the media is portraying the entire thing. It is VERY much being portrayed in an anti-religious light. They never discuss the actual alternatives. They discuss the "proven" "effective" "conventional" chemo vs. "mysterious and spiritual" ideals of "prayer" and "faith".
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Ok, I can see your point there as well. I generally stay away from mass media, as they do tend to spin the truth to match their own objectives. I also have no problem with people having faith, or praying for a loved one's recovery, I just don't think that anyone should rely on faith and prayer alone.
StrangeOne1987 2 years ago
That is certainly a fair assessment.
I can say that I certainly relied on prayer and faith when I was diagnosed. And I would have done what Jesus said regardless. But He led me to a treatment called Protocel that removed all of my cancer and the left-over tumor - with no side effects.
Thanks for taking the time to explain your perspective!
Ainesis3 2 years ago
I know this topic can raise strong emotions on many sides. I don't mind discussion or stating your views, but we will remove posts if they get out of hand.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
clearly, we live under medical tyranny. take a good look at america, world.
carolloving 2 years ago
you all need to get your heads out of your asses. don't be so quick to turn everything into an anti-religious conspiracy. When a parent is neglectful, they have no business raising children. If the parents are making a decision that will ultimately kill their children, then someone needs to step in.
StrangeOne1987 2 years ago
Why don't you start by taking your own recommendation first?
The unstated erroneous assumption your comment is that chemo is the only viable option. Who told you that? What proof do you have that this is true? Or, do you usually just follow what you are told?
Substantiate your implied assertions that no other treatment can work and you might have the basis for a reasonable argument.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Pay attention to what I said. I NEVER said that chemo was the only way to tread cancer, I merely stated that everyone should stop turning this into an anti-religious conspiracy.
StrangeOne1987 2 years ago
Unless that is exactly what it is.
And not "anti-religious", but anti-Christ.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
SETH Group ... "Herbal (THC) compound kills brain Cancer Cells - but not normal brain cells."
Dr. Guzman ... "THC can promote the autophagic death of human and mouse Cancer Cells"
Dr. Mechoulam ... "we gave THC oil drops 400 times to children 1 -13 years old with Cancer & prevented vomiting & nausea 100%"
Links to my previous 7 comments are located in my youtube page in my primary, secondary video & the last 5 comments are located below my profile picture.
EssiacHempLaetrile 2 years ago
The family's idea of 'cure' involves ionized water and magic ritual. This is not medically valid as 'cures' for cancer. Anyone with any sense of rationality can understand this.
3R3MITE 2 years ago
That is an untrue claim regarding the treatment they were going to pursue. And I am assuming you are in a position to determine what is "medically valid"?
The treatment which removed cancer from my body is listed on the FDA's list of "Fake Cancer Cures".
If you are looking for what is rational, why don't you look into the cozy relationship between the FDA and Big Pharma?
Ainesis3 2 years ago
It's neglectful behavior on the parents side and the poor boy is too young to form his own opinion on the matter because his parent's most likely brain washed him into believing into this bull crap miracle cure will work. Ionized water, whole grains and prayer is not a cure for cancer, it's the average person's breakfast.
Chemotherapy is currently the most successful treatment of cancer and it has worked for hundreds of thousands of people. People WILL die if they leave cancer untreated.
Krauserowns 2 years ago
And you base this info on...?
I was told I would die without chemo and radiation. I did not. In fact, my natural alternative treatment removed the cancer from my body.
People are so quick to believe what they are fed. Chemo IS touted as the most successful treatment. Ever wonder why that is? It is not hard to find out why. Do your research.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Because it...works? Because there is medical research and evidence that proves that it works? Yeah, that's probably it.
Krauserowns 2 years ago
LOL! According to who? Because the medical industry considers it "working" as long as the cancer is gone for 5 years. If the cancer comes back after that, you are still a statistical "cure."
Further, because it damages the immune system so, chemo can cause a bunch of other ailments from which you can die while still being counted as a statistical "success".
Again, do your own research or just keep reciting the party line. But don't try to pass that off as knowledge.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
You can't refute an argument by saying "according to who? lolz" You know damn well according to who, the American Cancer Association. My friend's mother had breast cancer. She took chemotherapy and it killed all of the cancer cells. Not only that but she completely recovered he health. So don't tell me that I have no knowledge of the matter you twat. You're not a rebel because you disbelieve in the way society thinks and acts, you're just a rebel for the sake of being a rebel.
Krauserowns 2 years ago
You cannot question the validity of an argument by asking for the source of an unsubstantiated statement? LOL OK
Of COURSE the American Cancer Society (not Association) is going to say that. Do you know where they get their funding? Apparently not.
I am glad to hear of your friend's mother's recovery. That is a blessing. By the way, I have never said that chemo never works.
Chemu can work, but chemo can also kill as well as cause MORE cancer.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
The bottom line is that there are MANY other ways to treat cancer other than chemo that are ALSO successful. The ACS and FDA only track and report on chemo because they are in bed with Big pharma.
Again, believe what you wish, but the evidence about successful alternate treatments as well as the conflicts with pharma companies are out there for anyone who wants to see.
Ainesis3 2 years ago
Who are you to determine what is neglectful? They are NOT refusing treatement rather they are trying a different option because he already had some chemo and it did not work! Its amazing how you eat up the biased media. Pretty soon the government will come for your kids! Pretty soon they will coem for your neighbors kids!
MissDragonFyre 2 years ago
"Some "chemo won't cure the cancer. It takes repeated dosages in order to get rid of it all. This bullcrap religious treatment has been refuted thousands of times by the medical experts in the American Cancer Association. In fact, their "miracle cure" is more along the lines of an average person's breakfast, not a cure for cancer.
Water, prayer and bread does not cure diseases.
Krauserowns 2 years ago
Where is the evidence they did magick ritual retard? Have you seen the court documents to make such a claim? Or are you eating up what the media claims to be true?
MissDragonFyre 2 years ago
Thanks for this vid, very informative outlook on how the media twists stories around.
Lakishia 2 years ago
sheesh they just don't want parents to make decisions for they kids.
they don't want people who can think for themselves, they want a world of zombies
yeah they want a bunch of yes people
kastsev 2 years ago
U doing the right thing for your son.The chemot is a sure killer....
SilverSurferTT36 2 years ago
the Sodium Bicarbonate in BAKING SODA cures cancer, radiation and chemo CAUSE cancer, im sure everybody and their mother knows this though
DJTonyAllen 2 years ago 2
many people don't know about that stuff and also vaccines.
dontlistentomeimmute 2 years ago
There is a surefire cure. Watch Run From the Cure
DaveIrie 2 years ago