Added: 3 years ago
From: drkrr2
Views: 4,484
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Was the system dry shot or wet shot ? Dry systems depends on stock oxygen sensors and stock injectors. (so they suck big time)  But even a primitive wet system that only has a seperate injector-mixer in intake manifold gives more proper amount of fuel to the engine.

  • The kit is the noszle direct port kit.

  • @drkrr2 so is that your uninformed way of saying it's a dry kit?

  • The engine made 250hp/290tq on all engine. I had the NOS Noszle kit on this car. I HATED it! Would never buy the system again. Made the car stall after you a run b/c it would flood out. Changing HP took 16 new jets, 8x the cost of others, and removing the injectors. Needless to say the numbers this kit made were more than disappointing. I have since traded this car for a Mach 1 (see my other videos). On that I have a NX wet kit and a like it 1000x better. 1/3 the cost too.

  • Sounds like that Noszle kit does suck! I made the same power as you NA, but with a Harris Speedworks wet kit with 125 hp jets mine put down 361hp/477tq. Your kit only gave you 100 ft/lbs of tq with the 125 shot jets?

  • I mean N/A ###'s to compare the 125 shot aginst.

  • no ###'s weak sauce

  • is your engine stock? what kind of shot is it wet or dry? and did you have any problems?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more