Even with faulty wording, one should infer, rather than vilify that which is already probably identified by the author as inexact. I'd go back and make a few revisions to my argument, but that's rather pointless. If I'm wrong I'm wrong; it'd be more foolish to continue to defend my position against my adversaries. However, I do not tolerate those who continue to berate old comments in a side quest to receive "thumbs up". If you want to continue this, then private message me.
@HyperionResident I have no desire to continue discourse with an adolescent. One thing we do agree on is Glenn Gould is not a musician - I gave you a thumbs up on that. No need to continue.
Wow. Was there any attempt to balance the ensemble? Or include the dynamics? Keep up the good clarinet playing and get a new director that knows what he is doing. I must say, however, that the alto clarinet player is quite exceptional! Alto cl. nice tone quality throughout and times, nice blend w/ 3rd clar. It is easy to overblow the 3rd cl. so be careful. To all - forte is not the only dynamic level.... come on.....
meh. the timing is off between the two sides and doesnt seem to be at all with the conductor. the balance is off too. badbadbad tuning. other then that i think its a job well done
i looked this up because my symphony band is playing this, and i was wondering how to play it. And my score says "PRELUDE and Fugue in G Minor?" its the same song, right?
There's a huge time gap between the sides, and the conductor isn't helping; the basses seem to be slightly out-of-tune; the piece could have been slower, and the right notes played in time; but GOOD JOB.
there is also a famous transcription of this song for a wind ensemble. it is a very well done arrangment. Some include the very beginning of the melody to be an oboe/clarinet solo for the first several measures until it goes up the scale with the 16th notes. This arrangment is not that well done. oh, well. :/
@sstuddert not really. Like I said to maestrojimbo, don't revive old arguments, particularly ones that already have been resolved. It's both pointless and frustrating.
Oh, and additionally, I don't really arrange marches. I have indeed arranged a whopping two, but that was well over a year ago. I've spent my time recently working on a much larger arrangement, coupled with an original orchestral composition. Don't berate if you're not au fait.
I hate to labor the point but i have the score in front of me and it says
"organ fugue in G Minor (little) 1709.
true a fugue does not imply a specific instrumentation but when the composer specifies the instrument(ation) I can asume that it was writen for the organ
it does sound nice, i have no argument with the posting, just alduflo who thinks he's an authority on musical terms. the argument did not stem from the video posting but somebody asking what the song was called, i said iy wasn'y a song it was an organ fugue and then that asshole made the comment that is all. i have no problems with the video
well excuse me, sorry for having an opinion on music. You could have been polite, If I would've known you'd take it up the ass I would've not said anything
OK. Listen to 0.20 - 0.44 - 1.25 - 2.26 - 2.32 - 2.45. They need more rehearsals. More rehearsals, that´s all. I love Bach in organ. I feel the sound of the clarinet is for Mozart, Brahms, gipsy music, Schrammelmusik, Kletzmer, Hassidic, not Bach. End of controversy.
Yh, the music is not suppose to be legato. The whole point in Baroque music is that its suppose to be 'Classical Pop Music'
You won't find a legato in pop music now-a-days won't you? Classical Music and Romantic contain many Legato features but not Jazz, Blues, Baroque and other modern music.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
my brian is hurting, i actually just looked at the name, when i heard the song my brain exploded but scientists were able to patch it back together but only a little of it, i went from A average to D-------------, or F, i think?
I didn't think I'd like this that much but I actually really like it. You can hear the separate lines a lot better than you can on organ or piano (ironically).
Even with faulty wording, one should infer, rather than vilify that which is already probably identified by the author as inexact. I'd go back and make a few revisions to my argument, but that's rather pointless. If I'm wrong I'm wrong; it'd be more foolish to continue to defend my position against my adversaries. However, I do not tolerate those who continue to berate old comments in a side quest to receive "thumbs up". If you want to continue this, then private message me.
@HyperionResident I have no desire to continue discourse with an adolescent. One thing we do agree on is Glenn Gould is not a musician - I gave you a thumbs up on that. No need to continue.
Wow. Was there any attempt to balance the ensemble? Or include the dynamics? Keep up the good clarinet playing and get a new director that knows what he is doing. I must say, however, that the alto clarinet player is quite exceptional! Alto cl. nice tone quality throughout and times, nice blend w/ 3rd clar. It is easy to overblow the 3rd cl. so be careful. To all - forte is not the only dynamic level.... come on.....
meh. the timing is off between the two sides and doesnt seem to be at all with the conductor. the balance is off too. badbadbad tuning. other then that i think its a job well done
i looked this up because my symphony band is playing this, and i was wondering how to play it. And my score says "PRELUDE and Fugue in G Minor?" its the same song, right?
There's a huge time gap between the sides, and the conductor isn't helping; the basses seem to be slightly out-of-tune; the piece could have been slower, and the right notes played in time; but GOOD JOB.
there is also a famous transcription of this song for a wind ensemble. it is a very well done arrangment. Some include the very beginning of the melody to be an oboe/clarinet solo for the first several measures until it goes up the scale with the 16th notes. This arrangment is not that well done. oh, well. :/
@sstuddert not really. Like I said to maestrojimbo, don't revive old arguments, particularly ones that already have been resolved. It's both pointless and frustrating.
Oh, and additionally, I don't really arrange marches. I have indeed arranged a whopping two, but that was well over a year ago. I've spent my time recently working on a much larger arrangement, coupled with an original orchestral composition. Don't berate if you're not au fait.
I hate to labor the point but i have the score in front of me and it says
"organ fugue in G Minor (little) 1709.
true a fugue does not imply a specific instrumentation but when the composer specifies the instrument(ation) I can asume that it was writen for the organ
it does sound nice, i have no argument with the posting, just alduflo who thinks he's an authority on musical terms. the argument did not stem from the video posting but somebody asking what the song was called, i said iy wasn'y a song it was an organ fugue and then that asshole made the comment that is all. i have no problems with the video
well excuse me, sorry for having an opinion on music. You could have been polite, If I would've known you'd take it up the ass I would've not said anything
OK. Listen to 0.20 - 0.44 - 1.25 - 2.26 - 2.32 - 2.45. They need more rehearsals. More rehearsals, that´s all. I love Bach in organ. I feel the sound of the clarinet is for Mozart, Brahms, gipsy music, Schrammelmusik, Kletzmer, Hassidic, not Bach. End of controversy.
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 month ago
a very good attempt ! ! !
kateciag 3 months ago
Hey! It's a good attempt.
htcstech 4 months ago
wow. I used to think everything sounded better on clarinet.
gyinagal 5 months ago
also some major tunage problems at various points in the video
HyperionResident 1 year ago
@HyperionResident "tunage" - is that old, aged tuna or what?
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
intonation hurr durr.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
@HyperionResident "hurr durr".... (uninelligible response)
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
uninelligible? Now we're both spouting incomprehensible gibberish. This is a rather vapid and frivolous altercation that will yield no results.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
@HyperionResident should read - "uninTelligible" which is exactly what your comments are. Make sense or don't bother to comment.
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
Even with faulty wording, one should infer, rather than vilify that which is already probably identified by the author as inexact. I'd go back and make a few revisions to my argument, but that's rather pointless. If I'm wrong I'm wrong; it'd be more foolish to continue to defend my position against my adversaries. However, I do not tolerate those who continue to berate old comments in a side quest to receive "thumbs up". If you want to continue this, then private message me.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
@HyperionResident I have no desire to continue discourse with an adolescent. One thing we do agree on is Glenn Gould is not a musician - I gave you a thumbs up on that. No need to continue.
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
Very well then. Good day to you sir.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
Why is there an extra empty row behind them?
KiyoKenshin 1 year ago
Wow. Was there any attempt to balance the ensemble? Or include the dynamics? Keep up the good clarinet playing and get a new director that knows what he is doing. I must say, however, that the alto clarinet player is quite exceptional! Alto cl. nice tone quality throughout and times, nice blend w/ 3rd clar. It is easy to overblow the 3rd cl. so be careful. To all - forte is not the only dynamic level.... come on.....
pratte1975 1 year ago
It's beautiful
OrunitaVivi 1 year ago
meh. the timing is off between the two sides and doesnt seem to be at all with the conductor. the balance is off too. badbadbad tuning. other then that i think its a job well done
pianoboeguitar 1 year ago
I see past the flaws right to the sweat on their brow - you kids take no shit and play from your heart
OrunitaVivi 1 year ago
This is really really clean and I LOVE IT! I love this song, and clarinet! :) GO CLARINET PLAYING!!! WOO! Great job!
shewroteandheread 2 years ago
wooot clarinets!
rachele1444 2 years ago
this was the first thing i could ever play on piano!!!
reesiepiecie123 2 years ago 2
you are AMAZING TO DO THAT!!!
KawaiiMangaArtist 2 years ago
i looked this up because my symphony band is playing this, and i was wondering how to play it. And my score says "PRELUDE and Fugue in G Minor?" its the same song, right?
pistonsfreak3 2 years ago
Bach wrote more than one prelude and fugue in G minor. Moreover, Bach wrote more than one "little" prelude and fugue in G minor.
OldManStudios 2 years ago
There's a huge time gap between the sides, and the conductor isn't helping; the basses seem to be slightly out-of-tune; the piece could have been slower, and the right notes played in time; but GOOD JOB.
XEA6L 2 years ago
@XEA6L i agree with everything and its very out of balance.
pianoboeguitar 1 year ago
there is also a famous transcription of this song for a wind ensemble. it is a very well done arrangment. Some include the very beginning of the melody to be an oboe/clarinet solo for the first several measures until it goes up the scale with the 16th notes. This arrangment is not that well done. oh, well. :/
emoClarinetist 2 years ago
this looks like it was filmed at FHSU.
Was it? Please tell me it was lol
FalconKyule 3 years ago
TWs up
miles7575 3 years ago
Ahh being a contra bass player, it would have been incredible to hear a contra doubling those basses :-) executed very well!
gossettls66 3 years ago
Nice tone quality, notes need to be tongued a bit more, not so heavy. It's intended to be a very light piece. But good work :)
gbvbhottie13 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Way too slow.. Definitely not amazing clarinetists.
edancoll 3 years ago
You can be a technical freak and still not be very musical.
Muze42 3 years ago 12
I agree, I think that sometimes people get too concerned with the technically things and lose sight of what music should be.
JaredtheJaredLong 3 years ago 3
@Muze42
you mean like Glen Gould
HyperionResident 1 year ago
@HyperionResident
The email I got from your reply made me confused. ^5 for the Hyperion though.
Muze42 1 year ago
@Muze42
Glenn Gould is a pianist who has like, ungodly technique, but no musicality whatsoever.
HyperionResident 1 year ago 3
@HyperionResident That might be one of the dumbest comments I have read all day.
memphis148 11 months ago 3
@memphis148
k. Don't care.
HyperionResident 11 months ago
@HyperionResident you must be mad, now go back to arranging your marches.
sstuddert 7 months ago
@sstuddert not really. Like I said to maestrojimbo, don't revive old arguments, particularly ones that already have been resolved. It's both pointless and frustrating.
Oh, and additionally, I don't really arrange marches. I have indeed arranged a whopping two, but that was well over a year ago. I've spent my time recently working on a much larger arrangement, coupled with an original orchestral composition. Don't berate if you're not au fait.
HyperionResident 7 months ago
@HyperionResident I don't see any reason as to why I shouldn't revive an old argument, particularly since it hasn't been resolved.
sstuddert 7 months ago
Comment removed
marliegirlie 3 years ago
It's a pipe organ piece and not a song
santanamauricio 3 years ago
lol its a fugue there is no predetermined instrumentation. An orchestra is probably the last instrumentation i would think of using for this though
alduflo 3 years ago
I hate to labor the point but i have the score in front of me and it says
"organ fugue in G Minor (little) 1709.
true a fugue does not imply a specific instrumentation but when the composer specifies the instrument(ation) I can asume that it was writen for the organ
santanamauricio 3 years ago
it is definitely meant for organ. but that does not mean it cant be classified as a "song."
karatekween33 2 years ago
it sounds nice, leave it out, no need to be a cock
mikebellamyLOLOL 2 years ago
it does sound nice, i have no argument with the posting, just alduflo who thinks he's an authority on musical terms. the argument did not stem from the video posting but somebody asking what the song was called, i said iy wasn'y a song it was an organ fugue and then that asshole made the comment that is all. i have no problems with the video
santanamauricio 2 years ago
ok we just played this peice for solo and ensamble and it IS origianlly an ORGAN peice.
beautifulsound10 2 years ago
well excuse me, sorry for having an opinion on music. You could have been polite, If I would've known you'd take it up the ass I would've not said anything
alduflo 2 years ago
I don't like the articulation sytle in this rendition, it should feel lighter.
GoldPhalanx2 3 years ago 2
Mr Vanguardyears, I see you only accept people who think like you think. You are an idiot!
zigeunerlieder 3 years ago 3
Okay, my reaction was a bit rude. Sorry about that. Still, it's not perfect, but doesn't really deserve a 1.
VanguardYears 3 years ago
OK. Listen to 0.20 - 0.44 - 1.25 - 2.26 - 2.32 - 2.45. They need more rehearsals. More rehearsals, that´s all. I love Bach in organ. I feel the sound of the clarinet is for Mozart, Brahms, gipsy music, Schrammelmusik, Kletzmer, Hassidic, not Bach. End of controversy.
zigeunerlieder 3 years ago
too much slow , I don't like it
BurstKata 3 years ago
absolutelt .. support
pop0313 3 years ago
Sorry, I voted poor. They need more rehearsals.
zigeunerlieder 3 years ago
This is gooooood!
Wacoswim 3 years ago
Were the 1st sopranos in a hurry at the beginning?
Watch the conductor while listening to the
1st's right in the beginning. By the time the counter melody comes in the 1st's are already 1 full beat ahead of the conductor.
nudist0885 3 years ago 3
I dont hear a diffrence.
BlueSoda4U 3 years ago
sometime eighths notes are not lining up...
but the sound is not mad, some very musical moments also
superkiller2009 3 years ago
hah !! play the alto sax (eb) the violin (c) and the paino (c) = happyness !!! =)
ummbreo 3 years ago
Theyre good. Well better than our clarinets.
kaimanathemetalhead 3 years ago
Not really, I have better influences in music than idiots xD
Montyleeny14 4 years ago
I play this with one of our Baritones in band. This, with all the Clarinets, is pretty cool. I used to play the Clarinet, Trombones now.
DancingSpacePotato 4 years ago
sorry..i ment it could have been a little faster...not I
hondaryder01 4 years ago
this sounded good..but i could have been a little faster...but dont get me wrong, it was really good
hondaryder01 4 years ago
it needs to be more legato
dpsnare4 4 years ago
Yh, the music is not suppose to be legato. The whole point in Baroque music is that its suppose to be 'Classical Pop Music'
You won't find a legato in pop music now-a-days won't you? Classical Music and Romantic contain many Legato features but not Jazz, Blues, Baroque and other modern music.
Montyleeny14 4 years ago
Hahaha. I hope you're kidding, Monty. I really, REALLY hope you're kidding.
Matteded 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your and idiot
hwsoccerkid 4 years ago
"The whole point in Baroque music is that its suppose to be 'Classical Pop Music'"
I'm not even sure what to say to that, other than it comes across as horribly uneducated.
brinmat 3 years ago
@Montyleeny14 Jesus wept...
sstuddert 7 months ago
this piece is so "bach"
nice song=]
jacline28 4 years ago
Good job! Four clarinets from our band tried playing that quartet and it was extremely challenging to get all of the parts to match.
sparkles0089 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ummmmm
xjuno11 4 years ago
Very good. 5 stars!
Insanecatlover 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They did a good job, but they sound like they are out of tune just a bit. But other than that I think it was well played.
martyabeyta 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my brian is hurting, i actually just looked at the name, when i heard the song my brain exploded but scientists were able to patch it back together but only a little of it, i went from A average to D-------------, or F, i think?
eggroles 4 years ago
its a great day to be a clarinet player
eggroles 4 years ago
this might not sound like crap if they were in tune and didn't get out of sync
riverscuomo06 4 years ago 4
it's supposed to sound like that. it's called counterpoint apparently...
plasmawisp18 4 years ago
don't try and be a smartass. that's not counterpoint, it's called trying to play bach and screwing it up.
riverscuomo06 4 years ago 3
LOL!! OWNED!! LOL!!
musico81986 4 years ago 2
I like this version though they have problems keeping the pace sometimes.
PooWL 4 years ago
nets rock!!
InfinityeXpress 4 years ago
huh?
eggroles 4 years ago
I didn't think I'd like this that much but I actually really like it. You can hear the separate lines a lot better than you can on organ or piano (ironically).
riteofspring13 4 years ago
As annoying as the clarinet itself. Sloppy, need to listen to each other more carefully. Some of you tend to rush things and not stay together.
musico81986 4 years ago
hey! i play clarinet!
eggroles 4 years ago
My condolences...!
musico81986 4 years ago 7
hahaha
hondaryder01 4 years ago
Yea I'm a low-brass player...can't you tell?!
musico81986 4 years ago
Low-brass as in trombone or as in tuba?
Musikdrenge 4 years ago
Tuba
musico81986 4 years ago
Trombone is Tenor Brass. Do you play? I like this arrangment.
DancingSpacePotato 4 years ago
Thank you for the tenor brass and I play the tuba. Bb
Musikdrenge 4 years ago
Tuba=happyness. I used to play the Bugle Corp Contra.
DancingSpacePotato 4 years ago
Tuba=happyness is right!
Musikdrenge 4 years ago
the best orchestra version i ve heard so far
jazz24p7 4 years ago
oh that sounds so right.....So professional... i love it so....
KaiserSehen 4 years ago
Very nice piece ! I'm interested in getting the arrangement
for clarinet ensemble. Would you be kind enough to share it
with me ? Thx.
cerisara 4 years ago
coolness
sfran0404 4 years ago
kick butt performance. =]
CrazyPonyRider10 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 month ago
a very good attempt ! ! !
kateciag 3 months ago
Hey! It's a good attempt.
htcstech 4 months ago
wow. I used to think everything sounded better on clarinet.
gyinagal 5 months ago
also some major tunage problems at various points in the video
HyperionResident 1 year ago
@HyperionResident "tunage" - is that old, aged tuna or what?
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
intonation hurr durr.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
@HyperionResident "hurr durr".... (uninelligible response)
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
uninelligible? Now we're both spouting incomprehensible gibberish. This is a rather vapid and frivolous altercation that will yield no results.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
@HyperionResident should read - "uninTelligible" which is exactly what your comments are. Make sense or don't bother to comment.
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
Even with faulty wording, one should infer, rather than vilify that which is already probably identified by the author as inexact. I'd go back and make a few revisions to my argument, but that's rather pointless. If I'm wrong I'm wrong; it'd be more foolish to continue to defend my position against my adversaries. However, I do not tolerate those who continue to berate old comments in a side quest to receive "thumbs up". If you want to continue this, then private message me.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
@HyperionResident I have no desire to continue discourse with an adolescent. One thing we do agree on is Glenn Gould is not a musician - I gave you a thumbs up on that. No need to continue.
maestrojimbo 8 months ago
@maestrojimbo
Very well then. Good day to you sir.
HyperionResident 8 months ago
Why is there an extra empty row behind them?
KiyoKenshin 1 year ago
Wow. Was there any attempt to balance the ensemble? Or include the dynamics? Keep up the good clarinet playing and get a new director that knows what he is doing. I must say, however, that the alto clarinet player is quite exceptional! Alto cl. nice tone quality throughout and times, nice blend w/ 3rd clar. It is easy to overblow the 3rd cl. so be careful. To all - forte is not the only dynamic level.... come on.....
pratte1975 1 year ago
It's beautiful
OrunitaVivi 1 year ago
meh. the timing is off between the two sides and doesnt seem to be at all with the conductor. the balance is off too. badbadbad tuning. other then that i think its a job well done
pianoboeguitar 1 year ago
I see past the flaws right to the sweat on their brow - you kids take no shit and play from your heart
OrunitaVivi 1 year ago
This is really really clean and I LOVE IT! I love this song, and clarinet! :) GO CLARINET PLAYING!!! WOO! Great job!
shewroteandheread 2 years ago
wooot clarinets!
rachele1444 2 years ago
this was the first thing i could ever play on piano!!!
reesiepiecie123 2 years ago 2
you are AMAZING TO DO THAT!!!
KawaiiMangaArtist 2 years ago
i looked this up because my symphony band is playing this, and i was wondering how to play it. And my score says "PRELUDE and Fugue in G Minor?" its the same song, right?
pistonsfreak3 2 years ago
Bach wrote more than one prelude and fugue in G minor. Moreover, Bach wrote more than one "little" prelude and fugue in G minor.
OldManStudios 2 years ago
There's a huge time gap between the sides, and the conductor isn't helping; the basses seem to be slightly out-of-tune; the piece could have been slower, and the right notes played in time; but GOOD JOB.
XEA6L 2 years ago
@XEA6L i agree with everything and its very out of balance.
pianoboeguitar 1 year ago
there is also a famous transcription of this song for a wind ensemble. it is a very well done arrangment. Some include the very beginning of the melody to be an oboe/clarinet solo for the first several measures until it goes up the scale with the 16th notes. This arrangment is not that well done. oh, well. :/
emoClarinetist 2 years ago
this looks like it was filmed at FHSU.
Was it? Please tell me it was lol
FalconKyule 3 years ago
TWs up
miles7575 3 years ago
Ahh being a contra bass player, it would have been incredible to hear a contra doubling those basses :-) executed very well!
gossettls66 3 years ago
Nice tone quality, notes need to be tongued a bit more, not so heavy. It's intended to be a very light piece. But good work :)
gbvbhottie13 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Way too slow.. Definitely not amazing clarinetists.
edancoll 3 years ago
You can be a technical freak and still not be very musical.
Muze42 3 years ago 12
I agree, I think that sometimes people get too concerned with the technically things and lose sight of what music should be.
JaredtheJaredLong 3 years ago 3
@Muze42
you mean like Glen Gould
HyperionResident 1 year ago
@HyperionResident
The email I got from your reply made me confused. ^5 for the Hyperion though.
Muze42 1 year ago
@Muze42
Glenn Gould is a pianist who has like, ungodly technique, but no musicality whatsoever.
HyperionResident 1 year ago 3
@HyperionResident That might be one of the dumbest comments I have read all day.
memphis148 11 months ago 3
@memphis148
k. Don't care.
HyperionResident 11 months ago
@HyperionResident you must be mad, now go back to arranging your marches.
sstuddert 7 months ago
@sstuddert not really. Like I said to maestrojimbo, don't revive old arguments, particularly ones that already have been resolved. It's both pointless and frustrating.
Oh, and additionally, I don't really arrange marches. I have indeed arranged a whopping two, but that was well over a year ago. I've spent my time recently working on a much larger arrangement, coupled with an original orchestral composition. Don't berate if you're not au fait.
HyperionResident 7 months ago
@HyperionResident I don't see any reason as to why I shouldn't revive an old argument, particularly since it hasn't been resolved.
sstuddert 7 months ago
Comment removed
marliegirlie 3 years ago
It's a pipe organ piece and not a song
santanamauricio 3 years ago
lol its a fugue there is no predetermined instrumentation. An orchestra is probably the last instrumentation i would think of using for this though
alduflo 3 years ago
I hate to labor the point but i have the score in front of me and it says
"organ fugue in G Minor (little) 1709.
true a fugue does not imply a specific instrumentation but when the composer specifies the instrument(ation) I can asume that it was writen for the organ
santanamauricio 3 years ago
it is definitely meant for organ. but that does not mean it cant be classified as a "song."
karatekween33 2 years ago
it sounds nice, leave it out, no need to be a cock
mikebellamyLOLOL 2 years ago
it does sound nice, i have no argument with the posting, just alduflo who thinks he's an authority on musical terms. the argument did not stem from the video posting but somebody asking what the song was called, i said iy wasn'y a song it was an organ fugue and then that asshole made the comment that is all. i have no problems with the video
santanamauricio 2 years ago
ok we just played this peice for solo and ensamble and it IS origianlly an ORGAN peice.
beautifulsound10 2 years ago
well excuse me, sorry for having an opinion on music. You could have been polite, If I would've known you'd take it up the ass I would've not said anything
alduflo 2 years ago
I don't like the articulation sytle in this rendition, it should feel lighter.
GoldPhalanx2 3 years ago 2
Mr Vanguardyears, I see you only accept people who think like you think. You are an idiot!
zigeunerlieder 3 years ago 3
Okay, my reaction was a bit rude. Sorry about that. Still, it's not perfect, but doesn't really deserve a 1.
VanguardYears 3 years ago
OK. Listen to 0.20 - 0.44 - 1.25 - 2.26 - 2.32 - 2.45. They need more rehearsals. More rehearsals, that´s all. I love Bach in organ. I feel the sound of the clarinet is for Mozart, Brahms, gipsy music, Schrammelmusik, Kletzmer, Hassidic, not Bach. End of controversy.
zigeunerlieder 3 years ago
too much slow , I don't like it
BurstKata 3 years ago
absolutelt .. support
pop0313 3 years ago
Sorry, I voted poor. They need more rehearsals.
zigeunerlieder 3 years ago
This is gooooood!
Wacoswim 3 years ago
Were the 1st sopranos in a hurry at the beginning?
Watch the conductor while listening to the
1st's right in the beginning. By the time the counter melody comes in the 1st's are already 1 full beat ahead of the conductor.
nudist0885 3 years ago 3
I dont hear a diffrence.
BlueSoda4U 3 years ago
sometime eighths notes are not lining up...
but the sound is not mad, some very musical moments also
superkiller2009 3 years ago
hah !! play the alto sax (eb) the violin (c) and the paino (c) = happyness !!! =)
ummbreo 3 years ago
Theyre good. Well better than our clarinets.
kaimanathemetalhead 3 years ago
Not really, I have better influences in music than idiots xD
Montyleeny14 4 years ago
I play this with one of our Baritones in band. This, with all the Clarinets, is pretty cool. I used to play the Clarinet, Trombones now.
DancingSpacePotato 4 years ago
sorry..i ment it could have been a little faster...not I
hondaryder01 4 years ago
this sounded good..but i could have been a little faster...but dont get me wrong, it was really good
hondaryder01 4 years ago