Added: 4 years ago
From: GasMotorsport
Views: 120,048
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (223)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this is supra engine?

  • Alcohol drag cars make about 2000hp either way the 3.2 seen here is smaller and makes the same hp. Muscle heads never change

  • hp ~ displacement / 10 * (1 + boost) * peakhprpm/7000 (boost in BAR)

    so with a 3.2 litre engine: 3200 / 10 * (1 + 4.5) * 7000/7000 = 1760 Then you gain some more with nitrous.

    For a big block dragster: 8194 / 10 * (1 + 5) * 8000/7000 = 5618 but they run on nitromethane so more like 7000+ hp

  • That's crazy horsepower but to those who doubt v8 are retarded. It said it was a drag motor and v8 alcohol drag motors make over 3000+ some way more than that..

  • That means each piston is putting out 340 HP each....thats more then what the car comes with stock....Toyota engineers prolly laugh at the V8's

  • I have one question the block is 3.2L OUR 3.0L?

  • who built the motor ?

  • If you want to see a tough V8 search MR PSI

  • 2041BHP not RWHP, just saying.

  • @Brimmy11 so clever

  • They can easily rev that to 10,000 rpm.

  • The blowoff.. jesus christ lol

  • Wow your making V8 power good work!

  • def not a daily driver

  • 750hp to 1750 hp before it even gets to 7000rpm and still going.... :O

  • 2 ferrari owners saw it :)

  • If the 3.2L engine lasted longer than a couple seconds, I would love it. But this DEFINITELY shows you that you can have a 1,000 hp Supra for everyday driving WITH ultimate reliability. And that is FUCKING COOL for a 3.0!!!

  • for all the v8 people who think this engine makes no power down look take a look at the graph this 3.2 BEAST makes over 700hp at 5000rpm!

  • @InitialDirt not bad for a six shooter but. those V8's can make 700 or more at 2K if you want :p

  • @antipeacemilitias 700 hp at 2,000 rpm is 1,838 lb.ft. In order to beat the Supra in this video (concerning specific torque), the V8 would have to have smaller displacement than 4.25 l. Surely possible, but definitely not easy... And the low end to mid range torque is intentionally kept low in this beast in order to save service life - you don't use torque under 6,000 rpm during a drag race in a 8,500 rpm car. Actually, the car looks like capable of surviving a few days of everyday driving.

  • @jakubkrcma Try Nelson Racing Engines to see what V8's are packing with TT setups BB or SB below or above 4 inches

  • @antipeacemilitias Yep, but the displacement is usually big-to-huge. What impresses me is specific output and this Supra is great in that respect.

  • @jakubkrcma i am a v8 guy but again that's why i said not bad for a six shooter. good job to the builders.

  • @antipeacemilitias Those V8 are great, though. A couple years ago it was unthinkable to have SUCH power in a daily driver. Thousands of hp, wow... And surely, I4, V8, V12, W16 etc. provide the best balance for a 4-stroke, the V8 being an overall optimum... (size, power, balance, sound,...).

  • @InitialDirt 5000RPM is not low range. and there are V8s that make 700hp at 2000RPM and lower in some cases. but yet again this is about this 2JZ so i wont be bashing good job

  • 1 person had a 7mgte

  • Drop this engine in a prius!

  • plz put that in my car, ill be the happies man on planet, dont want no pussy no more

  • Comment removed

  • @christopher12344321 lol. no shit Sherlock

  • @christopher12344321 Mr shirlock?

  • @RIPSNZ

    You gotta do a 2jz build!

  • Al Gore is getting pissed because all of the ozone layer is getting sucked into that blackhole of a turbo.

  • Comment removed

  • NICE!! now get that thing in a Prius!

  • Can a supra make 2041 hp at wheels?

  • @nikogpv no it cant lol

  • @nikogpv

    scroll through the list in right, youll see a 2200 hp scion. its also a 2JZ and more powerful than this one. I think it gets over 2k at the wheels.

  • @nikogpv Not that I know of. SW and Ryan Woon have put down 1500whp on a dyno that can only read up to 1500whp. No nitrous and still more boost to go. Far from beeing 2000whp but still, it's insane for a 3.4L I6 engine.

  • Hehe gotta love the jz series! I love them. I have 2 sitting in my garage right now. And i have a turbo 1uz in my soarer. Toyota makes. Some of the best engines I've ever seen.

  • @1uzttsoarer I wish I could flag you for causing excessive jealousy.

  • how much boost is being pushed into that 3.2?

  • @BruzedHQ

    About 4.5 to 5 bars, or 66psi -73psi

  • GLAD TO SEE THERE IS NO ARGUMENT ABOUT FWD!!! hahahhaa

  • @is300ss lol i was thinking the same thing lol can u imagine a fwd with this engine lol epic fail

  • toyota pruis's engine is way more power ful

  • according to this video bring on all your pussy ass shit. haha SUPRA POWER!!! GET SOME!

  • Pretty large powerband considering it revs up to 8500RPM and very flat torque curve and HP too. Must drag race like a pro.

  • wt a powerful engine

  • holy shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • HOLY FUCK!!!!

    the 2jz is truly a monster.

    what fuel is it on?

  • looks like the intercooler hose blew off.

  • @Sm1nts2escape looks like the blow off valve? but you can clearly see the entire intake system stretch out

  • @Sm1nts2escape it didnt..It was the blov off valve..

  • nice

  • Some rustang faggot said no 2JZ can hold 2000 horsepower. I showed him this video, and he got sand in his vagina. Yeah, we know V8s can make more power, but don't go saying shit without doing your research. And I bet there will one day be a 2JZ that will have more power. Just wait

  • 2041 horses out of 3.2 liters xD that is kick ass!

  • Sorry honduh girlies, but you all were not invited to the super high horsepower class. Vtec is short for VaginaTec. Toyota for the win, bitches!

  • fuck thats pumping out more juice than a 18 year old slapper

  • how many psi?

  • @dyegoplaza around 50 - 55 PSI

  • Wow. any supra motors with more HP than this?

  • What is that good for like 2 dyno pulls before it blows? That's insane.

  • @Scions4life hehehe, don't underestimate the power of a fully built 2JZ-GTE. They don't break easily even with that much power.

  • that engine is probably capable of time travel

  • No doubt man

  • LOL, reason why i said that, at like 0:14 it sounds like the delorean in back to the future when its start to do it's things.... ppppPPPRRRR SSHHHHHRRRR CCRRRRR, lol

  • Okay? Well I was thinking about it being powerful as shit.. soo...

  • @vonfred54 WTF do you mean probably? It is. Flux capacitor disguised as a 2JZ.

  • a 2000 hp j2z probly isnt reliable, it has to be rebuilt often, but DAMN, 2041 hp is a shit load from a 3.2 litre engine, amazing

  • umm its a supra motor i would think so...

  • but is it possible to fit this engine in to real supra?

  • no only a fake one

  • @setonas23 Of course it is!! You could buy one from Gas Motorsport yourself for less than what you'd pay for a pro stock engine in the states. If you leave good comments and admit that 2JZ's are better than V8's ;)

  • i didn't said that V8 is better than 2JZ engine why did you came with that? i know what 2JZ engine is capable of i sure do

  • 2JZ is just about the best motor ever created, but better than V8's? Physics say no lol, so does money, and times, and reliability.. list just goes on.

  • @TEFLONTHADON

    MOST powerful (with proper tuning) and best straight 6 cylinder engine in the world.

    V8 engines are another class. I6's and V8's are not comparable.

  • @2jzgtejza80 I would take a look at some 265ci hemi straight six videos. They have more torque than a guy knows what to do with. Plus there are land cruisers with 4.2 liter inlines that have the same potential. But yes 2jz is MEAN!!

  • @mkIIIsupras

    Cummins diesel have 6.9 liters engine inline 6 with biggest torque i ever seen, 50% more than supercharged LS9 from ZR1.

  • @2jzgtejza80 yeah i know. Them cummins are something else. I worked on one for a guy and he was pushing 43psi of boost. One of the better test drives i done!! blazed the right back tire off for a 1/8 mile at least. haha wasnt expecting it at all!!

  • @2jzgtejza80 Diesel engines put out a ton of torque, but usually lack in horsepower.

  • @FTDOOM

    Yeah I know, but Audi's diesel V12 puts out lots of torque and power, of course turbocharged.

  • @2jzgtejza80 V12 that says it all, Lol.

  • @FTDOOM

    not if you get that torque at a higher RPM

  • damn that thing looks like it's gonna take off and fly

  • 2JZ FTW... 2000hp from a 3L engine... 'nuff said.

  • that comes out to 625hp per liter. Brent Rau's 4G63 eclipse is making closer to 700hp per liter.

  • yeah but isn't that motor a inline 4??

  • @BryceGrover inline 6

  • inline 6

  • why would you ask that kind of question? must know nothing....... about anything.....

  • i was talking about the engine in the eclipse dumbass. i know supras have 2jz 6 cyclinders so suck it.

  • so you should have said that eclipse engine before you stupid fuck

  • i replied to the person that mentioned the eclipse motor you ignorant bastard

  • Torque x rpm =power. so torque is not related to horse power. simple piston engine knowledge...

  • Torque and Horse power are related... ANY engine that operates below 5252 RPM Will ALWAYS make more torque than Horsepower. Any engine that operates above 5252 RPM will ALWAYS make more horse power . If you ever look at a graph of Horse power and torque from a dyno readout they ALWAYS cross at 5252 RPM. Thats because the formula for determining horse power is ... Horse power = torque x RPM divided by 5252

  • @CRAZYPOPTARTII UR exactly right

  • TY TY :)

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • youre an idiot

  • impressive hp, but at 52 psi, I can't see it being reliable at all, it sounded like it was going to explode

  • its not meant to be

  • About AWD vs. RWD. Ask yourself this. In drag racing who has the fastest time, AWD or RWD? RWD. In purpose built track cars (Formula series, Oval tracks, ETC.) RWD have the fastest times. The only series that has faster AWD cars is rally.

  • @ttrot17 Most race cars are RWD, as the higher the power split at 500+HP is more than 80/20 to the rear, with 1000+ odd HP you would be over 90/10 and having a AWD system means more weight and more drivetrain powerloss.

    AWD is more manageable but by no means faster when you get high powered cars.

    This is obvious when you look at factory body drag cars which will often do wheel stands until the change into second on the PowerGlide or equiv.

  • @ttrot17 ..remember purpose built rwd's are faster on the track because of parasitic loss, but sheps awd talon street car is in the low 7's now. Awd's are meant for the street. 

  • @ttrot17 AWD drive cars have traction. That's the advantage. 4 gripping tires are better than 2. Although AWD are generally heavier, they also have drivetrain loss, of which on wide straights the RWD will dominate. Although say both cars are equally tuned and in weight, on tight tracks the AWD will dominate, on Wide open striaights, the RWD will dominate. Both have advantages and disadvantages.

  • @aShoe0o Well the RWD ZR1 beat almost every single production car around the Nurburgring. So with proper design a RWD car can still have excellent handling.

  • @IcyDeath91 Right you are. Depends on how well the car is designed and that's how it is suppposed to be.

  • @ttrot17 drag racing theres slicks. GT, formula etc. the over steer of a rwd helps with cornering. its just obvious that rally cars are awd.

    the one thing you forgot... STREET RACING WITH STREET TIRES. GIVING THE CARS HAVE THE SAME HP. from a dig... AWD if the person knows how to launch. from a roll RWD!! top speed RWD!! less rotational mass = PEACE. I drive a turbo'd sc300 so im all about RWD, but i must admit sometimes i do want an 550hp awd car instead of rwd. but drifting is raw too.

  • @ttrot17 not too mention the fact that rwd is >999x funner to drive

  • @ttrot17 You would be correct. However, out of all of the racing series that actually involve turning the steering wheel, none of the motors come even close to 2000 crank hp

  • O KURWA! (PL) :D

  • For a 2J this is a fucking monster, don't compare it to built big blocks lol.

  • no cause it would've exploded lol

  • Nitrous was used to cool the air temp at which it was sucked into the intake.

  • yeah that is that :D

  • everone talkin about this and thats.its 4banmgers out there hitin a 1000hp so wtf.now 2000hp it the is somethin diffrent

  • 1500HP to the crank for a 4g63

  • Impresive its just a proportional engine to the 4G63. 2JZ making 2041Hp to the flywheel thats insane. I think 4g63 could make around 1500HP to the flywheel. AMS did 1130AWHP, I heard they could put 100AWHP more and with a 20% drivetrain loss due to AWD on the AMS evo I am pretty sure the 2.1L AMS 4G63 could make 1500+HP to the flywheel.

    two amazing engines.

  • They aren't THAT proportional. The 4G63 make overall much less torque but can rev much more thus the high HP number. I've seen the ASM 1130AWHP video and they don't even show the torque number of curve which sucks.

  • yes they are, I ve seen 2.0L Mitsu evo and eclipse that put 1016AWHP put around

    650AWTQ, I am pretty sure that the ams evo puts around 700AWTQ but take in account that in AWD you have around a 20% to 25% loss due to a transfer case and two extra differentials.I think it could make aound 875TQ to the flywheel. the

    2JZ its about 1.5 times the size of the 4G. 1.5*875=1312 proportional HP and TQ.

    the only thing that stopped AMS from tuning the car more is the trans Case they could get more TQ

  • Well, you got me then. Very true. Sorry I thought you meant equivalent but no it's really proportional. Then yes. Absolutely. That's pretty impressive for 4 cylinders. That's why I want an Evo as a second hand car (1st beeing a Supra). Supra for summer and Evo for winter (and summer too sometimes hehe).

  • same with you there. if I could I would get a Mark IV Supra they are good for HWY and drag due to the RWD. the evo is good for Handling on the track and for take offs due to AWD. I would like to own both.

    4g63 best 4cyl and 2JZ best 6cyl

  • Amen brother! ;)

  • I'd rather have a RWD car for the track, not really interested in drags. Usually AWD cars tend to drive like a FWD car, but that's if you want traction.

  • Well the GTR does not drive that much Like a FWD car. Subie STi also is more balanced than the typical FWD the boxer engine is mounted more towards the center of the car. AWD usually handles better than FWD. The JDM evo has an electronic Active Yaw control, Active center differential that makes it handle better than a FWD. watch the Top Gear episode featuring the FQ-400 Evolution and you'll see AWD handling.

  • I've seen that video already, but that's a whole different discussion since electronics plays the biggest role in the car's handling.

    As long as there's an electronic aid in an AWD system it drives better than a FWD car and generally RWDs.

  • if AWD cars have the best handling then how come formula 1 cars dont use it as the main objective of f1 is to lap the track as fast as possible. AWD is just adding unecessary weight

  • hey I am not talking about F1 cars those are another animals. I am talking about street racing cars, cars that come mass produced from the factory and then are modded for track or drag racing. different category. AWD it's useful you can use it to get more traction like in rally racing or road racing. for street cars is uselful. anyways alot of parts from F1 cars are discarded or overhauled after each week or race. Modding street cars to push them to their limits while racing is another thing.

  • RWD requires a far higher level of driving ability to make it out preform an AWD, THB any 17yo can drive a wrx or evo quick around a track and the manufactures know this listen to the car review people say how easy they are to drive, i know this from personal experience, i currently own a powerful RWD car and its taken me a good 6-8 months to understand my car completely and push it to its extreme limits safely and im off the opinion that it handles better than a AWD it just takes more skill. XD

  • ??? shut the fuck up

  • AWD was banned from F1. Tells you everything.

  • awd was never banned its just not used. with the power it would just break every trans behind it. plus awd f1 car wouldnt handle well at all

  • Check the rules. "Only 2 wheels are allowed to be driven by the engine."

    They don't just put shit like that in the rules for nothing.

  • In forza 3.....anything is possible....including an AWD single turbo'd supra =)

    (we can always dream guys)

  • Nobody wants an awd supra. Why would you?

  • there are awd single turbos out there...

  • a awd supra has been made, search around supra forums and google.

  • o great another 100K+++++ car just been made we get to look at the pix online n the rich mother fker gets to sit in it

  • please stop the getto math that make no sence

  • dude this easy math, any 12 year old can get this math, proportion is just multiplication

    and division.

  • yea but your math is based on displacement..but you are wrong because not all motors with the same displacement make the same power so you cant say just because a motor is 1.5x bigger or smaller..sorry but that math is wrong..because you can find another 3.0 that can make more power than a 2jz and the other way around

  • name me a 3.2L that has the same capacity to make power than this 2JZ.

    I did not generalize this. my math is right but I did not generalize this to all engines.

    check my math with a calculator

  • Incredible. That's insane for 3.2L of engine. And I simply love the massive turbo roar when they let it spool just before going WOT.

  • what kinda wheel horse power would this make if it were in an actual supra?

  • 1.8k probably

  • about 1500rwhp on a dyno dynamics and about 1730rwhp on a dynojet

  • depends on how the car is set up ie. weight and rotational mass.

  • Due to the massive torque this would produce not much, Also drive trans designed to handle this power will be far from standard and is designed to have minimal power loss so I would say 80hp at the most. It would run atleast a 6 pak clutch made of ceramic so light and very good power transfer and able to handle to handle the mass of heat it would produce.

  • With an engine like that, I would be putting a powerglide on it and high stall torque converter.

  • O.o ..ok someone please explaine to me wat the hell that is.. ahahahh can i get one of those on a monthly paymen :)

  • best 6 cylndr engine ever made, till this day is still the dyno queen ;]

  • dyno KING**

  • Dyno Queen, Highway King :)

  • DOOOOD!!!!, how much PSI is it running?

  • are they spraying water meth? is that what's making it spray like that?

  • It was fitted with a water /ice to air intercooler.The spray from the bov when the engine was backed off was water vapor.

    the steam at the back of the engine is from the Dyno engine brake

  • dyno engine brake?can u pls explain me?

  • just like chassis dyno, this is engine dyno

  • It uses water as a resistance load. This beast straight-up boiled that shit.

  • Can't wait to see it run 1/4 mile!!!

  • so much psi the blow off valve purges water vapor

    sickkkkk

  • How in the world do you compare a 2.6 liter to a 3.2. You internet racers are pathetic sometimes.

  • jesus the horsepower line still kept climbing.

  • try tht with a rb26 and all you get is boom

  • true!

  • 2JZ rulz the World!!!