Wow stunning representation, some of my favorite objects to study, and just think about. But I have a question, in the event of a quasar jet, how does the "regurgitated" matter come out? Is it broken down or is it just the way it went in?
Objects like this, but most evidently middleweight black holes appear to be creating particles. I don't understand why science is looking the other way, since our supermassive black hole at galaxy center looks like it's making enough to repel stars using very large particles, larger than Higgs.
@mikefromspace - black holes don't create particles... the jets of material from the poles of black holes are made of matter that is not torn apart at the event horizon -- sometimes more matter is available to the black hole that can be "eaten." This matter backs up like a traffic jam and is expelled as relativistic jets at the poles.
@djxatlanta Stephen Hawking was the first to theorize that black holes create particles in a magazine article in 1995. How would you know if they do or do not? How would you then explain how super massive stars are repelled near galaxy center, without cheating using any superstrings or photons that magically exist on a magical plane? No offense, but black holes do create all the particles that exist, and the process in which they process them continually breaks the theory of the BigBang.
@mikefromspace there once was an intergalactic black hole that evaporated into Hawking radiation. Since there is a lack of matter as we know it between galaxies, it is a graveyard of the Atlantic to black holes and super condensed radiation. Caught in a dark matter gravity well, this end product radiation will continue to expand our universe. These are just my ideas though, know one is swimming in the 4th dimension yet.
@FieldMajor76 The universe is not expanding. Evidence was taken wrong. Microwave shift is slowed because it's a kinetic wave, and particles it uses are continually recycled near black holes/galaxies. This recycling is proven by gravitational lensing. Atomic vortexing of kinetic force results in particle sep, and largest particles return to funnels because of hydraulic movement of others. I have it all figured in diagrams. Proof there was no 'BigBang'.
@mikefromspace - *sigh* My channel is not an appropriate forum for debates about cosmology and astrophysics. The purpose of my channel is to showcase visualizations about our universe from a wide variety of sources across the web from reputable research and exploration organizations. If you have alternate theories on the makeup of the universe, I suggest finding an academic sponsor to help you present your ideas via a paper in an appropriate peer-approved manner.
Wow stunning representation, some of my favorite objects to study, and just think about. But I have a question, in the event of a quasar jet, how does the "regurgitated" matter come out? Is it broken down or is it just the way it went in?
xalentcash 9 months ago
Objects like this, but most evidently middleweight black holes appear to be creating particles. I don't understand why science is looking the other way, since our supermassive black hole at galaxy center looks like it's making enough to repel stars using very large particles, larger than Higgs.
mikefromspace 1 year ago
@mikefromspace - black holes don't create particles... the jets of material from the poles of black holes are made of matter that is not torn apart at the event horizon -- sometimes more matter is available to the black hole that can be "eaten." This matter backs up like a traffic jam and is expelled as relativistic jets at the poles.
djxatlanta 1 year ago
@djxatlanta Stephen Hawking was the first to theorize that black holes create particles in a magazine article in 1995. How would you know if they do or do not? How would you then explain how super massive stars are repelled near galaxy center, without cheating using any superstrings or photons that magically exist on a magical plane? No offense, but black holes do create all the particles that exist, and the process in which they process them continually breaks the theory of the BigBang.
mikefromspace 1 year ago
@mikefromspace there once was an intergalactic black hole that evaporated into Hawking radiation. Since there is a lack of matter as we know it between galaxies, it is a graveyard of the Atlantic to black holes and super condensed radiation. Caught in a dark matter gravity well, this end product radiation will continue to expand our universe. These are just my ideas though, know one is swimming in the 4th dimension yet.
FieldMajor76 1 year ago
@FieldMajor76 The universe is not expanding. Evidence was taken wrong. Microwave shift is slowed because it's a kinetic wave, and particles it uses are continually recycled near black holes/galaxies. This recycling is proven by gravitational lensing. Atomic vortexing of kinetic force results in particle sep, and largest particles return to funnels because of hydraulic movement of others. I have it all figured in diagrams. Proof there was no 'BigBang'.
mikefromspace 1 year ago
@mikefromspace - *sigh* My channel is not an appropriate forum for debates about cosmology and astrophysics. The purpose of my channel is to showcase visualizations about our universe from a wide variety of sources across the web from reputable research and exploration organizations. If you have alternate theories on the makeup of the universe, I suggest finding an academic sponsor to help you present your ideas via a paper in an appropriate peer-approved manner.
djxatlanta 1 year ago
@mikefromspace Gravitational lensing can be actually used as one of the (many) proofs that the universe is indeed expanding..
supergiuovane 1 year ago