Added: 8 months ago
From: swaaye
Views: 922
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Te graphics of this game still kick ass!

  • gs or gt or fx or gtx ?

  • Great upload. I could not believe my eyes when this game premiered at E3 2002. And then the internet experienced a collective nerdgasm when an alpha build was leaked.

  • Ironically, the next game in the engine lineup is much slower(Quake 4). Prey isn't playable unless you use the unsupported NV17 path and use 320x240.

  • @leileilol I played some Quake 4 on it and it's not too bad actually. It is only somewhat slower (and I was playing on my Athlon XP setup instead of the new Core 2 beast at the time). Maybe I'll vid capture that too.

  • @leileilol I remember Quake 4 being a little faster in most circumstances than Doom 3. The framerate in Doom 3 rarely exceeds 75fps on one of my systems, but Quake 4 moves from between 25 (large outdoor areas) to the 120-150 range most of the time.

    The game ran far better on Geforces than Radeons because of the leaked Alpha being blamed on ATI staff. I think from that moment, id stopped really giving a fuck about ATI. A fact proven in how the game plays on 9800pro vs fx5950 :)

  • @leileilol Quake 4 ran a *little* worse than Doom 3 on my 5900XT, but it wasn't a night and day difference. Prey was fine at 1024x768, so long as you disabled the high-quality skinning + other HQ settings; failure to do so would send performance plummeting.

  • Pretty nice, at least it shows what the FX series could do when optimized.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more