People Need to have the rescources to combat people useing concious or even subconcious logical fallacies. When one bad idea is spread it not only causes a chain reaction but it feeds back on it's self and amplifies even often times comeing full circle. Life is too short to waste time on what idea want to be true as oppose to ieas that are true. Even a large fraction of the ideas that people want to be true are influenced by ideas that are true so might as well accept them.
It is true that humans for maybe millenis have used some form of brainwashing or indocrination more specificly as a ubiquitous tool to convince and exploit people. If this could be minimised as much as possible science would be so much farther but that is obvious and barely deserves mentioning. But it is possibly to slant an otherwise unrecognisable story into soemthing scary.
I don't think evolution is specially made to inslave people that is just obsurde if you don't believe in it that's fine but don't make several leyers of conspiracy. Evolution certainly does not effect wether we have right or not, how does the common ancestry of life or saying we decened from simply forms effect wether we have the right to something, that is delusion in the purest form. People shouldn't lie but we still have at least some right no matter what is true. Think about this.
its just one class.. math is ALSO A PLAN OF the master mind.. to make sure you kids.. can GET A JOB. so they can USE HIM. to spread this plan FAST.. omg. save us.
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
Geologists went looking for evidence of a global flood over 200 years ago. They did not find any.
They found distinct layers of different kinds of rock with different fossil in them. Floods don't do that. They discovered it must have taken millions of years to make what we see.
The deceived person is totally unaware of his true position. Only by comparison to a true thing can the person find the truth. Hovind gave many observable facts in these talks that fly in the face of the evolution lie. Why is it you would rather have the lie?
being at the ass end of a joke isnt being brainwashed. Not getting a riddle isn't being brainwashed. Being forcefed disinformation, pseudoscience, and falsehoods by someone who claims to have devine knowledge and knows how to interperet god's word.. that, my friends, i being brainwashed.
Geologists found out the earth was old when they went looking for evidence of a global flood. They proved there was no flood and the earth is old. That was 200 years ago ! !
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
0:40 - wonderful! Kent approves of the American Revolution! And yet Deuteronomy 17:15 clearly states that "You shall appoint a King to rule over you.". I wonder if Kent will burn for all eternity in hell for supporting a political movement which rejected a divinely-appointed monarch...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ghanamuscle2000 news flash --- he was talking to and about the nation of Israel. You might also note that the American revolution started and financed by members of the masonic order. there is no requirement that a mason be a christian although they will accept christians as members. it is also relevant that at least 1/2 to possibly 2/3 of the colonists did not support the war. but it was ordained that our enemies rule over us until the return of our saviour the Christ ...continued next post
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ghanamuscle2000 as for kent burning in hell? well i am not his judge, but our judge has inspired the following: "Not by works of righteousness which we have done," (Tit 3:5a)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
For every species, a ladder of transitional forms leading up to it should be found. billions of transitional species should be engraved in the fossil rock and in nature today.
Yet every single fossil has shown animals in their distinct stage. no fossils with animals going through change has ever been found.
why?
God doesn't need to 'improve' his creation. he got it right the first time.
species died and became extinct. no species 'evolved'.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
fossil record???
if animals animals evolved and were changing from one kind to another, then these obviously must have been gradual changes overtime- over 'millions of years'. But if so, why are there no fossils to show a certain animal in their development stage?
according to macroevolution, an organism develops into a different organism overtime right? in between that timemajor changes would have to occur in ,say, the limbs, the head..all that. including the skeleton of the animal. right?
the term I gave ..' developement stage', refers to that time period. the years one animal takes to change into another. so if macroevolution is true. where are the fossils that show an animal (say, a cat) changing into another ( a dog?).there were no stages like that
LMAO cat changing into a dog? Can you please show me where evolutionary theory does it say that a cat can change into a dog? Your post is so fucking retarded it doesn't even warrant any further discussion. Pretty much sums up what you know about evolution. Fucking subhuman.
hah dude thats exactly what I'm saying. there is no such thing as an organism changing overnight. so how the hec can the macroevolution theory be true??? there were no 'stages in between', and there was no changing overnight therefore there was no macroevolution.
you yourself said that its crazy to suggest that an organism could change overnight. so how the hec could macroevolution occur?? haha you yourself think its crazy.
Can you provide a Bible passage to support your claim? And can you describe how Jesus gave the green light to the New Testament, considering that it was written AFTER his death?
Well, I can open the Koran to a random verse, and say that that proves the Koran is right. Same with the Vedic texts, or the Book of the Dead. I can do it with L Ron Hubbard's "Dianetics". Just because it is written down doesn't make it true.
And as for the "go ahead", you said "When Jesus came he examined the book thoroughly and declared it had been perfectly as it should be and had not been perverted in any way." I interpret "the book" to mean everything from Genesis to Revelation, right?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No because the Bible was written by numerous individuals, a majority of whom had never met one another, and when they put all the verses together, everything was consistent. Jesus examined it (God in the flesh) and saw that it was what he had intended it to be. I don't know the entire puzzle as to what all verses were in the book at the time, but it was enough to be called the Bible. The new testament goes into details, the old testament is simply the foundation for it.
1) I have studied each topic and evidence he has presented, and I have found absolutely NO FLAW. All the facts he presents are all as accurate as the fact, Michael Jackson says Hee-Hee' in many of his songs.'
2) He's a true God-fearing Christian. The average Christian doesnt WANT to lie, and Hovind has stated MANY times that he wants to be RIGHT all the time.
3) When you say he's a liar, you're either confused or you're deliberately lying yourself.
"Kent Hovind's a fraud, a liar!" Oh, liar, shmiar; I've searched up nearly every article and proof he has presented and I have found absolutely NO flaw in them. He may seem "crazy" if he did have "tax frauds", or whatever, but at least he may know some reasonable stuff we don't.
PS: The Evolution theory is reasonably stupid; the Creation message is reasonable reasonable (and makes a whole lot more sense and meaning.)
What gives you the idea that there is some sort of genetic barrier that prevent microevolution from progressing to macroevolution? Why would there be any protection provided for your vague idea of a created "kind"?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
it`s not a barrier, or protection! it`s just not possible to change into anything else! like seriously have you ever seen a dog give birth to anything other than a dog. or a banana tree grow anything other than a banana? like it just doesnt happen, because i can't! DNA doesnt change like that. and as for the "barrier" between micro and macro? it's not actually a barrier, it's the fact that they are definitions, and it just so happens that macro doesnt happen, while micro does.
Evolution doesn't say that one species births another. It explains how as populations of species become divided, they change (via mutation and selection) into something different from one another, until vast differences result from billions of years of time and changing environment.
In other words there is nothing preventing a species from changing over time. It also follows that nothing ever outgrows its ancestral ties, which is why we are still a type of money, primate, and mammal.
Evolution doesn't entail animals giving birth to completely different animals, rather the offspring are different in a few, subtle ways. So the dog gives birth to a dog thats just a little different. And this goes on for generations and generations until, all the those tiny changes have added up, and now the animal you had that was originally a dog is now a fox. And so on and so forth.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yeah except it doesnt work, because we would have soooooooooo many millions of half and half things running around these days... we couldnt even tell what things were... it would just be complete spectrum of different animals and stuff.
There IS a complete spectrum of animals and "stuff". However there wouldn't be "half and half" creatures running around, at least not to the extent that you're saying. There ARE creatures that look a bit hodgepodge in their appearance, okapi and platypuses (platypi?) come to mind. There ARE millions and millions of organisms on this planet, plenty of which look like they could be from a sci-fi show. Hell, just look at all weird looking plants in the world.
"i know i'm threatening your world view and bursting your little perfect bubble. too bad evolutioinists can't think outside the box"
Says the guy who bases his entire life and thought processes on the writings in one book, and what his preacher tells him to think. If that's not a mind in a tiny matchbox I don't know what is.
Why don't you just be honest and admit you're a creationist not because you're bright or did your homework, but because it feels good for you to believe such nonsense.
"i know i'm threatening your world view and bursting your little perfect bubble. too bad evolutioinists can't think outside the box"
Didnt evolution come about because someone was "thinking outside the box" and not listening to the creationist views that inundated the world with ignorance
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
a) by "writings in one book" i assume you mean the bible, which is in fact 66 different books written throughout the last 4 or 5000 years by 50 or so authors who lived in many different places, most of which never met eachother, and yet somehow wrote a coherent record of history that is historically accurate!
and b) since when does it feel good to believe in creation? honestly, evolution is the one that people want to beleive cause you have no higher power to answer to.
Those books were compiled into one book, ergo you are getting your knowledge from A book instead of natural observation and authoritative scientific literature.
Secondly, the bible isn't historically accurate by a long shot. In fact calling it accurate is tantamount to proclaiming your personal ignorance of history, or your insanity at denying your error, or both.
Creationism is a religion that promises eternal bliss and never-ending life. It frees you from thought, you merely listen.
most creationists believe it because it makes sense, not because it's convenient and makes them happy... like seriously if they... we, thought for a second that evolution was correct, and creation was a fraud, wouldnt we jump to the fact that we no longer have to be afraid of a god who will punish us if we do something wrong. and instead go out and do what the rest of the world does... be normal... make way more money, for business owners like my dad who could then open on saturday and so on.
Creationism can't make sense, because by definition it relies on the supernatural, the incomprehensibility of "god willed it that way because he could." In other words a bunch of smoke, mirrors, and hocus pocus.
Evolution works based on population statistics, molecular biology, biochemistry, ecology, and good old fashioned taxonomy. It must exist under scrutiny, and a self correcting process and it must predict facts, which it does. In other words, unlike your magic, it is a science.
k well this will take to long to argue with all your points... however you are wrong about the bible being historically accurate! cause it really is...
but about your last point, creation works on all those principles as well! like i'm not at all saying that biochemistry or ecology, or any of those are now done away with, and that "God did it" is our answer to every question. we still scrutinize and study things and prove things... we just start on a different premise than evolutionists
so really.. who is it that's hiding behind their beliefs? sure not me!
not that i beleive in a cruel god, but seriously, christianity is restrictive. so other than some crazy old people and stuff who just join the church for the fellowship and stuff... actually a lot of christians are like that. but a lot of us just believe it because it is the only reasonable explaination for why, and how we are here!
Christianity explains nothing, for starters. It doesn't explain why or how death and disease exists, it doesn't explain how life got here, or how life changes, it doesn't even afford an accurate account of our peoples histories, or a cogent, useful moral law system. Everything about it is antiquated, and superstitious.
Look, if you want to believe in fairy tales, go ahead. Maybe the idea of never dying and seeing your loved ones forever is comforting. But don't talk about what you don't know.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
OKAY, i am not a superstitious person who beleives in fairy tales. and the creation theory takes all of that into account and explains it better than the evolution theory does! do you know what your problem is? that you honestly have no idea what creationists beleive! you buy into all the media, like the simpsons episode about creation and evolution. but if you watch all of hovinds videos... or gave me like 2 hours to explain it, the creation theory takes into account everything!
the creationists arent the ones being comforted here, its the evolutionists in the fact that no matter what they do in this life, they will never have to deal with any of the consequences of their actions. and honestly i can't blame you for believing it... i would if i didnt realize how wrong it is!
also i forgot to say, that i do infact know what evolutionists believe... been taught it in school since forever, i've read up on it, watched ......
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
... many videos about it! argued with many evolutionists on the topic, i've read the bible, i've studied history in school, i'm not just some happy go lucky, "lets join the church because it sounds fun and the people are nice", ignorant person spouting facts that preachers or hovind, as the case may be says.
and i know what my eyes tell me, and that is that what we see in nature and the world could not have come about by chance. it just couldnt ever... no matter how long of time span happen!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
oh and one more thing! you said "or a cogent, useful moral law system"
my question to you is, what kind of moral law system does evolution have? like seriously think about this! according to evolution, its a dog eat dog world! there isnt any room for a moral code, or sympathy or empathy or any other moral thing. according to the theory, we are just a bunch of highly evolved animals? so it's the survival of the fittest!
it's the evolution theory that brought about things like the holocaust.....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
.... because someone named, Hitler believed darwins theory, and thought that the Jews, and every other race on the planet were less evolved, less intellegent and less important than the the germans. and because it's survival of the fittest he senslessly murdered millions of people! how does that fit in to any moral code?
and as i said, you really don't know what we believe or what you are talking about if you think that creation has no moral code... or any other of those things listed.
actually hitler was a creatard like you. He believed Jews had to be exterminated because they killed Jesus. If you had a brain you would've know that.
@Onehandspanking Hitler didn't really believe that, he was ordered to use that type of philosophy to establish a political entity that could be manipulated in a larger picture. Many of his top National Socialists were jews, and he was himself a Rothschild. He was also trained by British intelligence, which is a trans-national organization. SPURN THE MUSE!!
@Onehandspanking Actually he believed in evolution, he wanted to kill the Jews because he thought the arian race was the most evolved and wanted to help the evolution along by killing not only Jews but also blacks, hispanics and any one else who wasn't arian. Spend al little less time spanking with your one hand and do some research.
yes, it has been observed, if you knew anything about science, you would know how to simply look up the thousands of publicaions on it...please, go to school.
btw, i believe in creation as well, probably in a different way than you...i never even considerred evolution untill i was exposed to the mountian of evidence...perhaps this could be the same for you. Anyway, dont fear science...thats all i have to say.
sorry if ive offended yu with my language, but the least you could do is go to a local university and study this material, and then make your opinion known. If you are honestly curious about the material, feel free to pm me, and ill send you some evidence.
"it has not been observed and if it has than it wouldn't be a theory anymore."
Do you even know what a theory is? All i have to say about this comment is that htings like gravity and atoms are still in theoy as well. Im not getting angry, im just stating the facts, if you went to school you would see this too. There are numerous publications on observed macro evolution...this is a fact.
endogenous retroviruses are viral dna that is left in a genome. sometimes when a virus inserts its dna into a genome it fails to replicate and the viral dna is stuck in the genome. sometimes this happens in a germline cell thus all subsequent generations will have the viral dna at the same insertion site. humans and chimps have the same viral dna at the same insertions sites in their genomes. this shows that humans and chimps share common ancestry.
Nice. A mixture of paranoia, sloppy thinking and a complete lack of understanding of even the most basic tenets of science. I feel sorry for anyone stupid enough to believe a thing this man says.
If anyone here is honestly interested in what science has to say about an old earth, i can tell snyone first hand why this planet is old and why there was no great flood, this is a take it or leave it opportunity. There is a reason 99% of scientists believe in an old earth, if you honestly are curious why, just send me a private message and ill give you information im sure you never considerred or even knew existed. I can tell you all you need to know and more, that is all.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I guess you were there when God created the earth and told God not to flood the earth. Mr. commonsense guy I guess you have all truth and knowledge .So please tell us all what day ,year and why the earth exsist?
i guess you were there when those dumbasses who believed the Earth was flat wrote the bible...the fact of the matter is animals with quick mutation rates die, and if 2 animals speciate to thousands in 4000 years, that required devine intervention, not to mention there is no evidence for a global flood at all
and yet his argument against evolution (that they brainwash people)is the same thing that The Bible does. They teach young kids their whole lives this crap. The bible does have good morals in it, I admit that. But when they start believing in crap like that then they are the unfortunate victims in this.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This comment is out of ignorance. listen to his seminars. In 10 minutes of his seminar, I see more facts supporting his point then 10 hours of an evolutionist lecturing.
i noticed that too. you listen to the responses and half is swearing and name calling. the other half is ill-informed arguments. very little is real considered response, supported by real evidence.
That said, Creationism was what was before evolution, but the testable empiral evidenc lead us to conclude that creationism was wrong, and evolution was correct. The flat earth example is also false because of the littel amount ofevidence abelable to the people in that period. Now we have a tremendus amount of evidence supporting evolution.
Ok, Ill explain it to you antother way. The door exists, therfore if someone says the door doesn't exists i'll go and tell them, touch the door, feel the door, see the door. If someone says the door doesn't exists, ill ask them wich door. If then they tell me "that door" ill go and tell them ok so it it exists? You can go to percib the door with your sences. I don't know if i made myself clear?
It's funny, last year our phylosophy teacher gave us a challenge. He told us, Eny one prove to me that this door doesn't exist, and pointed to the door of the classroom. Every body began to think, until i finally got it and asked "What door?" The teacher smile at me and said "Exactly"... You see if you can touch, smell, taste, see, hear, messure, repeat, test and others can to, then you defenetly have a truth.
Ok, i'll explain: The credibility of the Bible is being tested, as it is not a correct document, therefore, to really prove the veracity you can refere to it not even once as a proof and he does it all the time, also i have checked some of hes facts and they are totaly wrong, In fact ill make a video about it later ill let you know, and what do you know. If hes so good, why is he in jail now.
So you have evolutionary theory and creation theory at loggerheads. You can take a piece of evidence and interpret it differently from either of those two perspectives. We should listen to both theories and make up our minds in an informed manner. It would be nice to see him in a videotaped debate with evolution theory proponents and see what happens.
He is in jail because the IRS disagrees with him on some tax problem. This has nothing to do with two theories being debated.
With your respect, i disagree with you, i'm sorry i have seen enought proof that the bible is bogus so i don't belive in a single word it says. Certenly you can extract from it moral homilies, from some parts, and interpretate the bible, but you can't take it litteral, it's just not possible. It is as usefull as the Sherlock Holmes books, as they both kind of describe real people, and have lots and lots o fictional characters over a kind of historical accurate era.
typical evolutionist, instead of making points avoidance and ignorance, if your at univeristy or college why dont you speak to a proffessor cus thats what i do ;D gonna calla professor stupid?
I'll tell you, im a Biology student and i had asked my professors about the remote possibility of creation being possible, non of them agree with it. The fact that we Today cannt maniofacture DNA from proteinoids only means we don't have the technologie yet, but will have it some day, and as technologie advances im sure it wont be long.
I love the conspiracy theory. Someone in science really wants your children to believe in evolution so they can start a new world order! Like scientists worldwide have a secret society to overthrow the govt...with evolution, LOL. This man is really delusional.
dallased25, you keep believing in that but there will not be an overthrown government. It might not happen in your lifetime but the leaders of the world will most likely just give it to the new world leader. When the world is in chaos, there will be a "person" that will seem like he is the best person to unite the world promising peace for all mankind. This will be a total lie and the one of the worst decisions mankind will make.
You are almost like a person that does not believe in a 18 wheeler coming straight at them going 70mph but since you do not beleive in 18 wheelers - You do not have to worry about being killed. The problem is that 18 wheelers are real from the last time I checked and this one is comming straight at you.
LMAO!!! That is the stupidest thing I have heard yet. First, the world leaders, countries, religions, etc are far too independent to ever trust one man. Second, the antichrist and the end of the world has been predicted at least 100 times and guess what...still not here and not going to happen.
I really feel badly for guys like you cause you don't enjoy life cause you are always expecting it to end. What a sad way to live. You are told your worthless by your religion and that the world is going to end any second...no wonder suicide rates are the highest in the US!
Wait a minute. Our religion tells us people are worthless. Our religion tells us that we are created by God and are his children and should live good lives so we go to heaven with him. Evolution says we came from nothing and are gonna rot in the grave. Anymore assanine remarks?
You are born into sin are you not? Your religion tells you that Jesus could come back anytime to end the world does it not? You rejoice in this, but it is a very negative outlook. Evolution doesn't say anything philosophical because it is a scientific theory. Do you look to gravity as well for advice on life? Want some more?
can you prove gravity exists? einsteins therom speculates gravity does not exist :D you obviously dont know enough about physics to be making any reference to it
And, yes i can prove gravity exist, and thats a therory as th therory of evolution, many of you creationist dont know what a theory in a science context means. It doesn't mean guess, or the most popular explanation, it IS an explanation but that is suportted with facts and logic. And it is on a very high basis very close to 100 % truth. Ofcourse science changes and it is that dynamism that makes it superior in eny way to religion.
"it IS an explanation but that is suportted with facts and logic. And it is on a very high basis very close to 100 % truth. "
at one time it was a theory that the world was flat. The theory was supported by facts and logic. Any fool could see that the earth was flat. It turns out that is untrue. It wasn't 100% correct, we just didn't have all of the information at the time. See the flaw with assuming that a theory is "very close to 100% truth"?
Im sorry your example is false and ill tell you why. Enyone living by the cost and seeing the horizon would see perfectly fine that the earth wasnt flat. because of the littel curvature of the horizon. Also the experimental evidence of the position of the stars and signs of rotation wich lead Galileo to asume that in fact the earth was moving, not the sun.
The End of the World has been predicted this is true, but by man! No one knows when only God the Father Jesus said so himself. Jesus gave signs of the time period the end will come in. We are living in that time period and i encourage you to watch my soon to be posted video on it.
Again, people have predicted that for over a thousand years and guess what...things are better off now than they ever have been as far as society, yet Christians still cling to this age old mythology. You want to believe that Jesus is coming..fine, but when he doesn't will you recant on your deathbed? Or simply make up another excuse?
Oh and by the way, we are not living in the end times. It says specifically in the bible that Jesus said that he would return within the lifetime of his personal followers at that time John 21:20-23. In another verse it says that the end times events would happen within that generation Mat 24:34 and this is further supported by Peter 4:7, Corin 7:29-31 and Hebrews 10:37. There are even more verses to support this.
LoL why does it always sound like he's talking about religion when he refers to brainwashing?:))
Tzootzy 3 months ago
People Need to have the rescources to combat people useing concious or even subconcious logical fallacies. When one bad idea is spread it not only causes a chain reaction but it feeds back on it's self and amplifies even often times comeing full circle. Life is too short to waste time on what idea want to be true as oppose to ieas that are true. Even a large fraction of the ideas that people want to be true are influenced by ideas that are true so might as well accept them.
RJL738 8 months ago
It is true that humans for maybe millenis have used some form of brainwashing or indocrination more specificly as a ubiquitous tool to convince and exploit people. If this could be minimised as much as possible science would be so much farther but that is obvious and barely deserves mentioning. But it is possibly to slant an otherwise unrecognisable story into soemthing scary.
RJL738 8 months ago
I don't think evolution is specially made to inslave people that is just obsurde if you don't believe in it that's fine but don't make several leyers of conspiracy. Evolution certainly does not effect wether we have right or not, how does the common ancestry of life or saying we decened from simply forms effect wether we have the right to something, that is delusion in the purest form. People shouldn't lie but we still have at least some right no matter what is true. Think about this.
RJL738 8 months ago
He is talking about logic. win.
RayRai8262 10 months ago
its just one class.. math is ALSO A PLAN OF the master mind.. to make sure you kids.. can GET A JOB. so they can USE HIM. to spread this plan FAST.. omg. save us.
RayRai8262 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Narrow Naughty girls and ladies here benaughtyman.info
sabithaperera 1 year ago
Comment removed
MckeesportRoseGarden 1 year ago
It is Testimony, and he is sworn in by the Almighty God already!
MckeesportRoseGarden 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
wrecks1961 1 year ago
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
wrecks1961 1 year ago
Geologists went looking for evidence of a global flood over 200 years ago. They did not find any.
They found distinct layers of different kinds of rock with different fossil in them. Floods don't do that. They discovered it must have taken millions of years to make what we see.
gregrutz 1 year ago 2
The only thing evolving is Science!
sabbath7 1 year ago
About 1000 years ago, scientists knew that the earth was at the center of the galaxy. About 600 years ago, scientists knew that the earth was flat.
About 500 years ago, scientists knew that bigger rocks fell faster than smaller rocks.
Today people believe that that they came from apes.
Scientists don't know shit.
spidertraceur15 1 year ago 2
@spidertraceur15 You're a retard
Paumonsu 1 year ago
That isn't even close to an example of "brainwashing", and even if it was, HE'S the one spreading his hilariously stupid fallacies.
brj0207 1 year ago
The deceived person is totally unaware of his true position. Only by comparison to a true thing can the person find the truth. Hovind gave many observable facts in these talks that fly in the face of the evolution lie. Why is it you would rather have the lie?
mtwseneca 1 year ago
@mtwseneca learn some science and then you'll learn that the one who is lying is Kent Hovind.
slickwick45 1 year ago
being at the ass end of a joke isnt being brainwashed. Not getting a riddle isn't being brainwashed. Being forcefed disinformation, pseudoscience, and falsehoods by someone who claims to have devine knowledge and knows how to interperet god's word.. that, my friends, i being brainwashed.
chattiestspike2 1 year ago 2
@chattiestspike2 It is Kent Hovind we're talking about.
Stitchman3875 1 year ago
"students are being tought this evolution theory that says rights come from the government"
what the fuck??
chattiestspike2 1 year ago
Someone said "I wish Carl Sagan would come back to life and kill this man!"
FOR WHAT?!
For legitimately introducing people to evidence that they are never shown in pro-New World Order schools?!
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 year ago
@Eye2EyeIIIV so how many videos are you going to copy and paste that comment on?
chattiestspike2 1 year ago
NO, it is science. Proven. Stop the lies, Kent.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Geologists found out the earth was old when they went looking for evidence of a global flood. They proved there was no flood and the earth is old. That was 200 years ago ! !
gregrutz 1 year ago
"Students are never shown the idea that the earth might be young"
LOL just like how students are never shown the idea that the earth might be flat.
LaingGod 1 year ago 11
@LaingGod It would be in your best interest to refrain from conversin with others, until you learn to think for yourself. SPURN THE MUSE!!
spurnthemuse 1 year ago
@LaingGod
Nice "comparative game" you're playing, but it ain't working.
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
wrecks1961 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LaingGod
Thats right kids kent Hovind is a real scientist. Millions of years ago is just a fairy tale, there are too many limiting factors. Evolution theory is just a FAIRY TALE about a rock that became a frog that became a dog, and the little old lady swallowed a lion to get rid of the dog and she swallowed an elephant to get rid of the lion.
wrecks1961 1 year ago
Don't have to argue with him, the courts found him cheating and put him in jail.
gregrutz 1 year ago 2
Yes, he is in jail.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@lligam Again, no. Typical evolutionist, believing what the press tell you instead of finding out what the real facts are.
tate22000 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@lligam actually, no.
tate22000 1 year ago
75% is not enough !!!!!!!
chinh101 2 years ago
Science only in science class.
gregrutz 2 years ago
0:40 - wonderful! Kent approves of the American Revolution! And yet Deuteronomy 17:15 clearly states that "You shall appoint a King to rule over you.". I wonder if Kent will burn for all eternity in hell for supporting a political movement which rejected a divinely-appointed monarch...
ghanamuscle2000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are STUPID, so shut up and listen you might learn something
fokofpoes 2 years ago
Excuse me?
ghanamuscle2000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ghanamuscle2000 news flash --- he was talking to and about the nation of Israel. You might also note that the American revolution started and financed by members of the masonic order. there is no requirement that a mason be a christian although they will accept christians as members. it is also relevant that at least 1/2 to possibly 2/3 of the colonists did not support the war. but it was ordained that our enemies rule over us until the return of our saviour the Christ ...continued next post
ferdnerkel 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ghanamuscle2000 as for kent burning in hell? well i am not his judge, but our judge has inspired the following: "Not by works of righteousness which we have done," (Tit 3:5a)
ferdnerkel 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
For every species, a ladder of transitional forms leading up to it should be found. billions of transitional species should be engraved in the fossil rock and in nature today.
Yet every single fossil has shown animals in their distinct stage. no fossils with animals going through change has ever been found.
why?
God doesn't need to 'improve' his creation. he got it right the first time.
species died and became extinct. no species 'evolved'.
justinyeyah 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fossil record???
if animals animals evolved and were changing from one kind to another, then these obviously must have been gradual changes overtime- over 'millions of years'. But if so, why are there no fossils to show a certain animal in their development stage?
justinyeyah 2 years ago
@Justin
wtf is a an animal in developmental stage?
NegativeBeef 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
according to macroevolution, an organism develops into a different organism overtime right? in between that timemajor changes would have to occur in ,say, the limbs, the head..all that. including the skeleton of the animal. right?
the term I gave ..' developement stage', refers to that time period. the years one animal takes to change into another. so if macroevolution is true. where are the fossils that show an animal (say, a cat) changing into another ( a dog?).there were no stages like that
justinyeyah 1 year ago
Comment removed
NegativeBeef 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LMAO cat changing into a dog? Can you please show me where evolutionary theory does it say that a cat can change into a dog? Your post is so fucking retarded it doesn't even warrant any further discussion. Pretty much sums up what you know about evolution. Fucking subhuman.
NegativeBeef 1 year ago 2
hah dude thats exactly what I'm saying. there is no such thing as an organism changing overnight. so how the hec can the macroevolution theory be true??? there were no 'stages in between', and there was no changing overnight therefore there was no macroevolution.
you yourself said that its crazy to suggest that an organism could change overnight. so how the hec could macroevolution occur?? haha you yourself think its crazy.
justinyeyah 1 year ago
You are not brainwashing, just lying.
The fossil record shows dinosaurs ruled the earth, lived and evolved, for 180 million years, got any questions?
gregrutz 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Bible is law and has been proven to be true already Dhesyca.
When Jesus came he examined the book thoroughly and declared it had been perfectly as it should be and had not been perverted in any way.
PFC33 2 years ago
Can you provide a Bible passage to support your claim? And can you describe how Jesus gave the green light to the New Testament, considering that it was written AFTER his death?
ghanamuscle2000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
To prove the Bible right? You can open it up to a random verse and figure that out, don't need my help.
Don't put words into my mouth, I never said he gave the "go ahead" for the new testament.
PFC33 2 years ago
Well, I can open the Koran to a random verse, and say that that proves the Koran is right. Same with the Vedic texts, or the Book of the Dead. I can do it with L Ron Hubbard's "Dianetics". Just because it is written down doesn't make it true.
And as for the "go ahead", you said "When Jesus came he examined the book thoroughly and declared it had been perfectly as it should be and had not been perverted in any way." I interpret "the book" to mean everything from Genesis to Revelation, right?
ghanamuscle2000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No because the Bible was written by numerous individuals, a majority of whom had never met one another, and when they put all the verses together, everything was consistent. Jesus examined it (God in the flesh) and saw that it was what he had intended it to be. I don't know the entire puzzle as to what all verses were in the book at the time, but it was enough to be called the Bible. The new testament goes into details, the old testament is simply the foundation for it.
PFC33 2 years ago
I notice Kent Hovind has never "proven beyond a shadow of a doubt" that the Bible is without error.
Dhesyca 2 years ago 2
Ok, so now we've got conspiracy theories...
Dhesyca 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Facts why Kent Hovind cannot be lying:
1) I have studied each topic and evidence he has presented, and I have found absolutely NO FLAW. All the facts he presents are all as accurate as the fact, Michael Jackson says Hee-Hee' in many of his songs.'
2) He's a true God-fearing Christian. The average Christian doesnt WANT to lie, and Hovind has stated MANY times that he wants to be RIGHT all the time.
3) When you say he's a liar, you're either confused or you're deliberately lying yourself.
Eye2EyeIIIV 2 years ago
Oh boy, here comes the Alex Jones stuff, Kent Kent Kent. People ask the State to get married because they want the damn tax benefits, dumbass.
Joseph565112 2 years ago
What is in your Closet?
Try and be as Honest as Darwin and Hawkins would you?
NoneBeforeNoneAfter 2 years ago
His examples with the tax law is hilarious seen what happened.
andvil01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Kent Hovind's a fraud, a liar!" Oh, liar, shmiar; I've searched up nearly every article and proof he has presented and I have found absolutely NO flaw in them. He may seem "crazy" if he did have "tax frauds", or whatever, but at least he may know some reasonable stuff we don't.
PS: The Evolution theory is reasonably stupid; the Creation message is reasonable reasonable (and makes a whole lot more sense and meaning.)
Eye2Eye35 2 years ago
What gives you the idea that there is some sort of genetic barrier that prevent microevolution from progressing to macroevolution? Why would there be any protection provided for your vague idea of a created "kind"?
ShrapnelSong 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it`s not a barrier, or protection! it`s just not possible to change into anything else! like seriously have you ever seen a dog give birth to anything other than a dog. or a banana tree grow anything other than a banana? like it just doesnt happen, because i can't! DNA doesnt change like that. and as for the "barrier" between micro and macro? it's not actually a barrier, it's the fact that they are definitions, and it just so happens that macro doesnt happen, while micro does.
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
Evolution doesn't say that one species births another. It explains how as populations of species become divided, they change (via mutation and selection) into something different from one another, until vast differences result from billions of years of time and changing environment.
In other words there is nothing preventing a species from changing over time. It also follows that nothing ever outgrows its ancestral ties, which is why we are still a type of money, primate, and mammal.
kDest 2 years ago
Evolution doesn't entail animals giving birth to completely different animals, rather the offspring are different in a few, subtle ways. So the dog gives birth to a dog thats just a little different. And this goes on for generations and generations until, all the those tiny changes have added up, and now the animal you had that was originally a dog is now a fox. And so on and so forth.
ShrapnelSong 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah except it doesnt work, because we would have soooooooooo many millions of half and half things running around these days... we couldnt even tell what things were... it would just be complete spectrum of different animals and stuff.
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
There IS a complete spectrum of animals and "stuff". However there wouldn't be "half and half" creatures running around, at least not to the extent that you're saying. There ARE creatures that look a bit hodgepodge in their appearance, okapi and platypuses (platypi?) come to mind. There ARE millions and millions of organisms on this planet, plenty of which look like they could be from a sci-fi show. Hell, just look at all weird looking plants in the world.
ShrapnelSong 2 years ago
you cant go from micro to macro evolution that easily. Ever heard of DNA? probably not.
912sidvicious 2 years ago
There is nothing inside dna, there is no function that can pick up what conditions are happening or what's going on outside.
You can't get a suntan, and then your dna say "oh your skin got roasted, lets stick this into our gene pool so we can stand the sun better!"
That's an impossible transaction.
nagzul 2 years ago
"i know i'm threatening your world view and bursting your little perfect bubble. too bad evolutioinists can't think outside the box"
Says the guy who bases his entire life and thought processes on the writings in one book, and what his preacher tells him to think. If that's not a mind in a tiny matchbox I don't know what is.
Why don't you just be honest and admit you're a creationist not because you're bright or did your homework, but because it feels good for you to believe such nonsense.
kDest 2 years ago
"i know i'm threatening your world view and bursting your little perfect bubble. too bad evolutioinists can't think outside the box"
Didnt evolution come about because someone was "thinking outside the box" and not listening to the creationist views that inundated the world with ignorance
ninjabob42 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
a) by "writings in one book" i assume you mean the bible, which is in fact 66 different books written throughout the last 4 or 5000 years by 50 or so authors who lived in many different places, most of which never met eachother, and yet somehow wrote a coherent record of history that is historically accurate!
and b) since when does it feel good to believe in creation? honestly, evolution is the one that people want to beleive cause you have no higher power to answer to.
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
Those books were compiled into one book, ergo you are getting your knowledge from A book instead of natural observation and authoritative scientific literature.
Secondly, the bible isn't historically accurate by a long shot. In fact calling it accurate is tantamount to proclaiming your personal ignorance of history, or your insanity at denying your error, or both.
Creationism is a religion that promises eternal bliss and never-ending life. It frees you from thought, you merely listen.
kDest 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
most creationists believe it because it makes sense, not because it's convenient and makes them happy... like seriously if they... we, thought for a second that evolution was correct, and creation was a fraud, wouldnt we jump to the fact that we no longer have to be afraid of a god who will punish us if we do something wrong. and instead go out and do what the rest of the world does... be normal... make way more money, for business owners like my dad who could then open on saturday and so on.
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
Creationism can't make sense, because by definition it relies on the supernatural, the incomprehensibility of "god willed it that way because he could." In other words a bunch of smoke, mirrors, and hocus pocus.
Evolution works based on population statistics, molecular biology, biochemistry, ecology, and good old fashioned taxonomy. It must exist under scrutiny, and a self correcting process and it must predict facts, which it does. In other words, unlike your magic, it is a science.
kDest 2 years ago
k well this will take to long to argue with all your points... however you are wrong about the bible being historically accurate! cause it really is...
but about your last point, creation works on all those principles as well! like i'm not at all saying that biochemistry or ecology, or any of those are now done away with, and that "God did it" is our answer to every question. we still scrutinize and study things and prove things... we just start on a different premise than evolutionists
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
so really.. who is it that's hiding behind their beliefs? sure not me!
not that i beleive in a cruel god, but seriously, christianity is restrictive. so other than some crazy old people and stuff who just join the church for the fellowship and stuff... actually a lot of christians are like that. but a lot of us just believe it because it is the only reasonable explaination for why, and how we are here!
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
Christianity explains nothing, for starters. It doesn't explain why or how death and disease exists, it doesn't explain how life got here, or how life changes, it doesn't even afford an accurate account of our peoples histories, or a cogent, useful moral law system. Everything about it is antiquated, and superstitious.
Look, if you want to believe in fairy tales, go ahead. Maybe the idea of never dying and seeing your loved ones forever is comforting. But don't talk about what you don't know.
kDest 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
OKAY, i am not a superstitious person who beleives in fairy tales. and the creation theory takes all of that into account and explains it better than the evolution theory does! do you know what your problem is? that you honestly have no idea what creationists beleive! you buy into all the media, like the simpsons episode about creation and evolution. but if you watch all of hovinds videos... or gave me like 2 hours to explain it, the creation theory takes into account everything!
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
also, as i said before... somewhere down there. v
the creationists arent the ones being comforted here, its the evolutionists in the fact that no matter what they do in this life, they will never have to deal with any of the consequences of their actions. and honestly i can't blame you for believing it... i would if i didnt realize how wrong it is!
also i forgot to say, that i do infact know what evolutionists believe... been taught it in school since forever, i've read up on it, watched ......
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
... many videos about it! argued with many evolutionists on the topic, i've read the bible, i've studied history in school, i'm not just some happy go lucky, "lets join the church because it sounds fun and the people are nice", ignorant person spouting facts that preachers or hovind, as the case may be says.
and i know what my eyes tell me, and that is that what we see in nature and the world could not have come about by chance. it just couldnt ever... no matter how long of time span happen!
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh and one more thing! you said "or a cogent, useful moral law system"
my question to you is, what kind of moral law system does evolution have? like seriously think about this! according to evolution, its a dog eat dog world! there isnt any room for a moral code, or sympathy or empathy or any other moral thing. according to the theory, we are just a bunch of highly evolved animals? so it's the survival of the fittest!
it's the evolution theory that brought about things like the holocaust.....
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
.... because someone named, Hitler believed darwins theory, and thought that the Jews, and every other race on the planet were less evolved, less intellegent and less important than the the germans. and because it's survival of the fittest he senslessly murdered millions of people! how does that fit in to any moral code?
and as i said, you really don't know what we believe or what you are talking about if you think that creation has no moral code... or any other of those things listed.
Nestorslanding 2 years ago
actually hitler was a creatard like you. He believed Jews had to be exterminated because they killed Jesus. If you had a brain you would've know that.
Onehandspanking 1 year ago 4
@Onehandspanking Hitler didn't really believe that, he was ordered to use that type of philosophy to establish a political entity that could be manipulated in a larger picture. Many of his top National Socialists were jews, and he was himself a Rothschild. He was also trained by British intelligence, which is a trans-national organization. SPURN THE MUSE!!
spurnthemuse 1 year ago
@Onehandspanking Actually he believed in evolution, he wanted to kill the Jews because he thought the arian race was the most evolved and wanted to help the evolution along by killing not only Jews but also blacks, hispanics and any one else who wasn't arian. Spend al little less time spanking with your one hand and do some research.
lmusho 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here are just a few other things to consider about about Hovind before you believe his bullshit
Spent over $10,000 trying to avoid a $50 building permit
He thinks 9/11 was a conspiracy
He thinks Laetrile is a cure for cancer but the government is withholding the secret from the public
Thinks many other diseases were engineered by money makers
He is a convicted felon, and here is one of the excuses he tried to justify his tax evasion. He claimed everything he owned really belonged to God
argetfalcon 3 years ago
yes, it has been observed, if you knew anything about science, you would know how to simply look up the thousands of publicaions on it...please, go to school.
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
btw, i believe in creation as well, probably in a different way than you...i never even considerred evolution untill i was exposed to the mountian of evidence...perhaps this could be the same for you. Anyway, dont fear science...thats all i have to say.
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
sorry if ive offended yu with my language, but the least you could do is go to a local university and study this material, and then make your opinion known. If you are honestly curious about the material, feel free to pm me, and ill send you some evidence.
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
"it has not been observed and if it has than it wouldn't be a theory anymore."
Do you even know what a theory is? All i have to say about this comment is that htings like gravity and atoms are still in theoy as well. Im not getting angry, im just stating the facts, if you went to school you would see this too. There are numerous publications on observed macro evolution...this is a fact.
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
"wait there is actual evidence for evolution that hasn't been disproven yet? o please show me"
hahaha youre funny...how about the fact that macroevolution has been observed?
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
endogenous retroviruses are viral dna that is left in a genome. sometimes when a virus inserts its dna into a genome it fails to replicate and the viral dna is stuck in the genome. sometimes this happens in a germline cell thus all subsequent generations will have the viral dna at the same insertion site. humans and chimps have the same viral dna at the same insertions sites in their genomes. this shows that humans and chimps share common ancestry.
jtyranus 3 years ago
This guy is a freak of nature, I cannot believe people would accept what he says? Suppose thats how cults start and they get plenty of followers.
I am glad he is not teaching in schools!
chrishibbert20 3 years ago 3
Nice. A mixture of paranoia, sloppy thinking and a complete lack of understanding of even the most basic tenets of science. I feel sorry for anyone stupid enough to believe a thing this man says.
rrward 3 years ago 2
This is insane!
What science class did this guy teach? where? What was his doctorate about? what field?
Falloutmoon 3 years ago 4
he has no accreditted credentials, he has a degree is bullshitology from the university of my degree is made of cheap toilet paper
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago 3
@Falloutmoon non-accredited Midwestern Baptist College, as in a school full of crap
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
@Falloutmoon
He got his doctorate at some unknown Bible college. By all intensive purposes he is not a proper "Dr." at all.
Kent Hovind is so hilarious.
He doesn't even know the bare fundamentals of biology or any science for that matter.
It is actually on the level of comedy for an educated person to listen to him speak. :)
karlkarlkarl1234 1 year ago
@Falloutmoon It is Testimony, and he is sworn in by the Almighty God already!
MckeesportRoseGarden 1 year ago
If anyone here is honestly interested in what science has to say about an old earth, i can tell snyone first hand why this planet is old and why there was no great flood, this is a take it or leave it opportunity. There is a reason 99% of scientists believe in an old earth, if you honestly are curious why, just send me a private message and ill give you information im sure you never considerred or even knew existed. I can tell you all you need to know and more, that is all.
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I guess you were there when God created the earth and told God not to flood the earth. Mr. commonsense guy I guess you have all truth and knowledge .So please tell us all what day ,year and why the earth exsist?
eternaldestiny777 3 years ago
i guess you were there when those dumbasses who believed the Earth was flat wrote the bible...the fact of the matter is animals with quick mutation rates die, and if 2 animals speciate to thousands in 4000 years, that required devine intervention, not to mention there is no evidence for a global flood at all
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
"I guess you were there when God created the earth" were you? at least there is physical evidence to back up claims of evo theory and old earth.
jtyranus 3 years ago
Teching kids that they came from nowhere by chance and not telling them that it is a lie is what creates pointless violence and death.
Creation is gods gift to all, but the greater gift is the gift of heaven.
loop543s 3 years ago
dear god, you poor uninformed human
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dear lord, you poor thing, thinkies you exploded from some dust and magically became urself without any help
artem1002 3 years ago
go to school
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago 5
Obviously the founding fathers never read the Bible where it says to obey your masters with respect and fear (Ephesians 6:5).
Dolirn 3 years ago 2
and yet his argument against evolution (that they brainwash people)is the same thing that The Bible does. They teach young kids their whole lives this crap. The bible does have good morals in it, I admit that. But when they start believing in crap like that then they are the unfortunate victims in this.
(Sounds like Al Quida)
Hamish27 3 years ago
I think this guy is mentally ill.
Cavy9999999 3 years ago
Oh dear so every scientist is lokking for a new world order! I'm looking for the truth. Not fantasy land like this!
kerhascoet 3 years ago
Hovind is in prison now because he is a liar....what does the bible say about lying?
davelovelady 4 years ago 2
I think it is against it, but I got that from Woody Harrelson, so it might be wrong.
jimsartor 4 years ago
The funny thing about Kent is, he never makes any point about anything. Just wandering babble.
debaucheryBotched 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This comment is out of ignorance. listen to his seminars. In 10 minutes of his seminar, I see more facts supporting his point then 10 hours of an evolutionist lecturing.
zigzagzoo12 4 years ago
No, he has been refuted many times over; the best he can come up with is illogical fallacies.
sweatytoothmadman 4 years ago 3
what you have just wrote is pure stupidity
Lesson88 4 years ago
i noticed that too. you listen to the responses and half is swearing and name calling. the other half is ill-informed arguments. very little is real considered response, supported by real evidence.
wiinux 4 years ago 2
u fuckin dumb ass
Lesson88 4 years ago
Hooked on Phonics doesn't work for everybody. Stay in school.
sweatytoothmadman 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol
Lesson88 3 years ago
rights are only concepts. they exist because we decided they should.
trigunner87 4 years ago 2
Are you calling Shiva a liar?
ringard64 4 years ago
Choose, damn it, not chose.
ringard64 4 years ago
Which creator would that be? There are plenty to chose from.
ringard64 4 years ago
The creator God of the Bible is what he's talking about.
Jconnizle1234 4 years ago
That said, Creationism was what was before evolution, but the testable empiral evidenc lead us to conclude that creationism was wrong, and evolution was correct. The flat earth example is also false because of the littel amount ofevidence abelable to the people in that period. Now we have a tremendus amount of evidence supporting evolution.
drahyden 4 years ago
free Kent!!
djr3000 4 years ago
He belongs in jail.
TheDarkLordLucifer 4 years ago
and this is comming from TheDarkLordLucifer... you dumb ass
Lesson88 4 years ago
ironic...
wiinux 4 years ago
...drahyden's philosophy thing about the door.
eltrosewater 4 years ago
Ok, Ill explain it to you antother way. The door exists, therfore if someone says the door doesn't exists i'll go and tell them, touch the door, feel the door, see the door. If someone says the door doesn't exists, ill ask them wich door. If then they tell me "that door" ill go and tell them ok so it it exists? You can go to percib the door with your sences. I don't know if i made myself clear?
drahyden 4 years ago
so, empiricism is what you're talking about? the "which door?" threw me off, i suppose.
eltrosewater 4 years ago
Yes, basically
drahyden 4 years ago
it makes me sad whenever i watch this guy. to think that people actually take him seriously...
drakeblackhorn 4 years ago
It's funny, last year our phylosophy teacher gave us a challenge. He told us, Eny one prove to me that this door doesn't exist, and pointed to the door of the classroom. Every body began to think, until i finally got it and asked "What door?" The teacher smile at me and said "Exactly"... You see if you can touch, smell, taste, see, hear, messure, repeat, test and others can to, then you defenetly have a truth.
drahyden 4 years ago
i respectively do not understand
eltrosewater 4 years ago
Is phylosophy devoted to the study of greek pastry? Just wondering
davelovelady 4 years ago
I cant belive this guy, It is sooo retarded
drahyden 4 years ago
What specifically is retarded?
rnech 4 years ago
Ok, i'll explain: The credibility of the Bible is being tested, as it is not a correct document, therefore, to really prove the veracity you can refere to it not even once as a proof and he does it all the time, also i have checked some of hes facts and they are totaly wrong, In fact ill make a video about it later ill let you know, and what do you know. If hes so good, why is he in jail now.
drahyden 4 years ago
So you have evolutionary theory and creation theory at loggerheads. You can take a piece of evidence and interpret it differently from either of those two perspectives. We should listen to both theories and make up our minds in an informed manner. It would be nice to see him in a videotaped debate with evolution theory proponents and see what happens.
He is in jail because the IRS disagrees with him on some tax problem. This has nothing to do with two theories being debated.
rnech 4 years ago
With your respect, i disagree with you, i'm sorry i have seen enought proof that the bible is bogus so i don't belive in a single word it says. Certenly you can extract from it moral homilies, from some parts, and interpretate the bible, but you can't take it litteral, it's just not possible. It is as usefull as the Sherlock Holmes books, as they both kind of describe real people, and have lots and lots o fictional characters over a kind of historical accurate era.
drahyden 4 years ago
lots of accounts that have videos criticising kent hovind are being suspended
including:
rabidape
rationalresponse
richarddawkinsnet
FlappyDraws 4 years ago
This despite the very clear message given by Mr. Hovind in most of his seminars that his material is NOT copyrighted.
phoenixshade3 4 years ago 2
typical evolutionist, instead of making points avoidance and ignorance, if your at univeristy or college why dont you speak to a proffessor cus thats what i do ;D gonna calla professor stupid?
shadowhunter231 4 years ago
I'll tell you, im a Biology student and i had asked my professors about the remote possibility of creation being possible, non of them agree with it. The fact that we Today cannt maniofacture DNA from proteinoids only means we don't have the technologie yet, but will have it some day, and as technologie advances im sure it wont be long.
drahyden 4 years ago
Is this the guy they locked up for tax evasion.
jayshano 4 years ago 2
Yes, although it should have been fraud.
tskaface 4 years ago 2
He's not even trying to prove evolution wrong with broken science anymore. He's just spouting absolute nonsense to his BRAINWASHED crowd.
Cupit29 4 years ago
BS BS BS BS BS BS BS
Ravel87 4 years ago
I love the conspiracy theory. Someone in science really wants your children to believe in evolution so they can start a new world order! Like scientists worldwide have a secret society to overthrow the govt...with evolution, LOL. This man is really delusional.
dallased25 4 years ago 2
dallased25, you keep believing in that but there will not be an overthrown government. It might not happen in your lifetime but the leaders of the world will most likely just give it to the new world leader. When the world is in chaos, there will be a "person" that will seem like he is the best person to unite the world promising peace for all mankind. This will be a total lie and the one of the worst decisions mankind will make.
bin11001010 4 years ago
BTW this person will be the antichrist.
bin11001010 4 years ago
You are almost like a person that does not believe in a 18 wheeler coming straight at them going 70mph but since you do not beleive in 18 wheelers - You do not have to worry about being killed. The problem is that 18 wheelers are real from the last time I checked and this one is comming straight at you.
bin11001010 4 years ago
The only thing that will save you is the same thing that you are mock what Kent Hovind has been telling you.
bin11001010 4 years ago
LMAO!!! That is the stupidest thing I have heard yet. First, the world leaders, countries, religions, etc are far too independent to ever trust one man. Second, the antichrist and the end of the world has been predicted at least 100 times and guess what...still not here and not going to happen.
dallased25 4 years ago
I really feel badly for guys like you cause you don't enjoy life cause you are always expecting it to end. What a sad way to live. You are told your worthless by your religion and that the world is going to end any second...no wonder suicide rates are the highest in the US!
dallased25 4 years ago
Wait a minute. Our religion tells us people are worthless. Our religion tells us that we are created by God and are his children and should live good lives so we go to heaven with him. Evolution says we came from nothing and are gonna rot in the grave. Anymore assanine remarks?
michaeld7 4 years ago
You are born into sin are you not? Your religion tells you that Jesus could come back anytime to end the world does it not? You rejoice in this, but it is a very negative outlook. Evolution doesn't say anything philosophical because it is a scientific theory. Do you look to gravity as well for advice on life? Want some more?
dallased25 4 years ago
can you prove gravity exists? einsteins therom speculates gravity does not exist :D you obviously dont know enough about physics to be making any reference to it
shadowhunter231 4 years ago
This does not even warrant a response it is so utterly stupid.
dallased25 4 years ago
And, yes i can prove gravity exist, and thats a therory as th therory of evolution, many of you creationist dont know what a theory in a science context means. It doesn't mean guess, or the most popular explanation, it IS an explanation but that is suportted with facts and logic. And it is on a very high basis very close to 100 % truth. Ofcourse science changes and it is that dynamism that makes it superior in eny way to religion.
drahyden 4 years ago
@ drahyden
"it IS an explanation but that is suportted with facts and logic. And it is on a very high basis very close to 100 % truth. "
at one time it was a theory that the world was flat. The theory was supported by facts and logic. Any fool could see that the earth was flat. It turns out that is untrue. It wasn't 100% correct, we just didn't have all of the information at the time. See the flaw with assuming that a theory is "very close to 100% truth"?
cenjohn73 4 years ago
Im sorry your example is false and ill tell you why. Enyone living by the cost and seeing the horizon would see perfectly fine that the earth wasnt flat. because of the littel curvature of the horizon. Also the experimental evidence of the position of the stars and signs of rotation wich lead Galileo to asume that in fact the earth was moving, not the sun.
drahyden 4 years ago
The End of the World has been predicted this is true, but by man! No one knows when only God the Father Jesus said so himself. Jesus gave signs of the time period the end will come in. We are living in that time period and i encourage you to watch my soon to be posted video on it.
michaeld7 4 years ago
Again, people have predicted that for over a thousand years and guess what...things are better off now than they ever have been as far as society, yet Christians still cling to this age old mythology. You want to believe that Jesus is coming..fine, but when he doesn't will you recant on your deathbed? Or simply make up another excuse?
dallased25 4 years ago
Oh and by the way, we are not living in the end times. It says specifically in the bible that Jesus said that he would return within the lifetime of his personal followers at that time John 21:20-23. In another verse it says that the end times events would happen within that generation Mat 24:34 and this is further supported by Peter 4:7, Corin 7:29-31 and Hebrews 10:37. There are even more verses to support this.
dallased25 4 years ago
Ever heard of orthodox preterism?
damildlyshreddah 4 years ago